experimental molecular evolution

49
Experimental Molecular Evolution

Upload: devlin

Post on 14-Jan-2016

56 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Experimental Molecular Evolution. Evolution of bacterial resistance to antibiotics D. M. Weinreich, N. F. Delaney, M. A. DePristo & D. L. Hartl. 2006. Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins. Science 312: 111-114. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Experimental Molecular EvolutionExperimental Molecular Evolution

Page 2: Experimental Molecular Evolution
Page 3: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Evolution of bacterial resistance to antibiotics

D. M. Weinreich, N. F. Delaney, M. A. DePristo & D. L. Hartl. 2006. Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins. Science 312: 111-114.

Evolution of bacterial resistance to antibiotics

D. M. Weinreich, N. F. Delaney, M. A. DePristo & D. L. Hartl. 2006. Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins. Science 312: 111-114.

Page 4: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics (e.g., penicillin) is mediated by ß-lactamase, which hydrolyses and inactivates these drugs.

5 point mutations in ß-lactamase jointly increase resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics by a factor of ~100,000. These consist of four missense mutations (A42G, E104K, M182T, G238S) and one 5' noncoding mutation (g4205a).

5 mutations must occur for the resistant allele TEM* to evolve from the wild type allele TEMwt.

Resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics (e.g., penicillin) is mediated by ß-lactamase, which hydrolyses and inactivates these drugs.

5 point mutations in ß-lactamase jointly increase resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics by a factor of ~100,000. These consist of four missense mutations (A42G, E104K, M182T, G238S) and one 5' noncoding mutation (g4205a).

5 mutations must occur for the resistant allele TEM* to evolve from the wild type allele TEMwt.

Page 5: Experimental Molecular Evolution

There are 5! = 120 mutational trajectories to evolve TEM* from TEMwt.

Experimental Results:

102 of the 120 mutational trajectories from TEMwt to TEM* are selectively inaccessible.

Most resistance evolved through 10 mutational trajectories.

There are 5! = 120 mutational trajectories to evolve TEM* from TEMwt.

Experimental Results:

102 of the 120 mutational trajectories from TEMwt to TEM* are selectively inaccessible.

Most resistance evolved through 10 mutational trajectories.

Page 6: Experimental Molecular Evolution
Page 7: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Tree of Life

Hypothesis: Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) was hyperthermophilic (>80 °C), lived in hydrothermal vents (black smokers)

Mesophile = 20-40°C Thermophile = 45-75°C Hyperthermophile ≥ 80°C

Page 8: Experimental Molecular Evolution

xx x x x xxx x x x xx

>3000 B.C.

Proto-Germanic

MiddleEnglish

Old English

Old HighGerman

Gothicsnaiws

snow

snaw

sneoChurchSlavonic

snegu

Old Irish

Proto-Indoeuropean

Old Norse

Greekφιν

.Old Fr

Latin

OldPrussian

snechte

œsn rnoif

, nix nivus

α

*snigw -h

xx

Slavic Germanic Romance Celtic

Reconstructing the past from the present

Reconstruction says something about the Proto-Indoeuropeans

They lived where it snowed.

Page 9: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Elongation Factor-Tu: G-protein involved in translationElongation Factor-Tu: G-protein involved in translation

Used to elucidate ancient evolutionary relationships

EF-Tu is thermostable in thermophilic organisms, not in mesophilic organisms

EF-Tu from thermophiles is not optimally functional at mesophilic temperatures

Linear relationship between optimal binding temperature of EF protein and optimal growth temperature of the host organism.

Used to elucidate ancient evolutionary relationships

EF-Tu is thermostable in thermophilic organisms, not in mesophilic organisms

EF-Tu from thermophiles is not optimally functional at mesophilic temperatures

Linear relationship between optimal binding temperature of EF protein and optimal growth temperature of the host organism.

Page 10: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Proteobacteria

Cyanobacteria

Spirochaete

Green Sulfur

Bacillus

ActinobacteriaThermus

Thermotogale

Outgroup Outgroup

Thermotogale

Thermus

Bacillus

Green Sulfur

Spirochaete

Cyanobacteria

Proteobacteria

Actinobacteria

Maximum Likelihood Tree Alternative Tree

ML-Stem

Page 11: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Proteobacteria

Cyanobacteria

Spirochaete

Green Sulfur

Bacillus

ActinobacteriaThermus

Thermotogale

Outgroup Outgroup

Thermotogale

Thermus

Bacillus

Green Sulfur

Spirochaete

Cyanobacteria

Proteobacteria

Actinobacteria

Maximum Likelihood Tree Alternative Tree

ML-Stem Alt-Stem

Page 12: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Proteobacteria

Cyanobacteria

Spirochaete

Green Sulfur

Bacillus

ActinobacteriaThermus

Thermotogale

Outgroup Outgroup

Thermotogale

Thermus

Bacillus

Green Sulfur

Spirochaete

Cyanobacteria

Proteobacteria

Actinobacteria

Maximum Likelihood Tree Alternative Tree

ML-Stem

ML-Meso

Alt-Stem

Page 13: Experimental Molecular Evolution
Page 14: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Synthesizing Ancestral ProteinsSynthesizing Ancestral Proteins

Generate overlapping primer pairs, extended using PCR (Each primer = 50 bases, with 20 base overlap)

Generate overlapping primer pairs, extended using PCR (Each primer = 50 bases, with 20 base overlap)

Gene inserted into cloning vector and sequenced

Removed from cloning vector, inserted into expression vector and sequenced again

Transformed into expression host (E. coli, ER2566), induced with IPTG

This results in the translation of a fusion construct containing:

- Chitin Binding Domain- Intein- EFTu gene

Gene inserted into cloning vector and sequenced

Removed from cloning vector, inserted into expression vector and sequenced again

Transformed into expression host (E. coli, ER2566), induced with IPTG

This results in the translation of a fusion construct containing:

- Chitin Binding Domain- Intein- EFTu gene

Page 15: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Precursor

CBD-InteinEF-Tu

111 kDa

66 kDa45 kDa

EF-Tu Antibody

Page 16: Experimental Molecular Evolution

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

oC

Relative amount of [

3H] GDP Incorporation

E. coli

Page 17: Experimental Molecular Evolution

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

oC

Relative amount of [

3H] GDP Incorporation

ML-meso

E. coli

Page 18: Experimental Molecular Evolution

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Thermus

oC

Relative amount [

3H] GDP Incorporation

Page 19: Experimental Molecular Evolution

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Thermus

ML-stem

oC

Relative amount [

3H] GDP Incorporation

Page 20: Experimental Molecular Evolution

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Thermus

Alt-stem

ML-stem

oC

Relative amount [

3H] GDP Incorporation

Page 21: Experimental Molecular Evolution

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

ThermusAlt-stemML-stemThermotoga

oC

Relative amount [

3H] GDP Incorporation

Page 22: Experimental Molecular Evolution

HydrothermalVents:

Broad Range of Temperatures

Across Narrow Area

Page 23: Experimental Molecular Evolution

ThermalHot Springs:

Narrow Range of Temperatures

Across Broad Area

Consistent withancient EFs

~65ºC

Page 24: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Molecular Molecular BreedingBreeding

Page 25: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Very variableVery variablepopulationpopulation

MonomorphicMonomorphicpopulationpopulation

selectionselection

++breedingbreeding

Page 26: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Less variableLess variablepopulationpopulation

NoNopopulationpopulation

selectionselection

++breedingbreeding

Page 27: Experimental Molecular Evolution

How to create novel

variation1. Mutationa. Randomb. Directed

2. Recombination

Page 28: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Mutations occur at low frequencies and are mostly deleterious.

Page 29: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Directed mutations are useful if we know a priori which sequence will accomplish which task.

Page 30: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Recombination produces a lot of functional variation.

Page 31: Experimental Molecular Evolution
Page 32: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Willem P. StemmerWillem P. Stemmer

Page 33: Experimental Molecular Evolution

The Protocol… The Protocol…

Page 34: Experimental Molecular Evolution

1. Identify a product 1. Identify a product that can be improved.that can be improved.

Page 35: Experimental Molecular Evolution

… … and sold and sold with no with no controversy.controversy.

Page 36: Experimental Molecular Evolution

Laundry detergents contain Laundry detergents contain the following active enzymes: the following active enzymes:

Protease — removal of Protease — removal of protein stainsprotein stains

Amylase — removal of Amylase — removal of starchy stainsstarchy stains

Lipase — removal of greasy Lipase — removal of greasy stainsstains

Peroxidase — bleachingPeroxidase — bleachingCellulase — softeningCellulase — softening

Laundry detergents contain Laundry detergents contain the following active enzymes: the following active enzymes:

Protease — removal of Protease — removal of protein stainsprotein stains

Amylase — removal of Amylase — removal of starchy stainsstarchy stains

Lipase — removal of greasy Lipase — removal of greasy stainsstains

Peroxidase — bleachingPeroxidase — bleachingCellulase — softeningCellulase — softening

Page 37: Experimental Molecular Evolution

2. Select a gene that may 2. Select a gene that may improve the product.improve the product.

Page 38: Experimental Molecular Evolution

3. Obtain homologous 3. Obtain homologous genes from diverse genes from diverse sources.sources.

Page 39: Experimental Molecular Evolution

4. Mix “parental” genes in a solution.4. Mix “parental” genes in a solution.

Page 40: Experimental Molecular Evolution

5. Fragment the genes in a 5. Fragment the genes in a number of different ways.number of different ways.

Page 41: Experimental Molecular Evolution

6. Heat the solution so the 6. Heat the solution so the fragmentsfragments become single stranded. become single stranded.

Page 42: Experimental Molecular Evolution

7. Cool the solution so that the 7. Cool the solution so that the gene fragments reanneal at sites of gene fragments reanneal at sites of complementarity, thus, creating complementarity, thus, creating novel recombinations. novel recombinations.

Page 43: Experimental Molecular Evolution

8. The novel recombinations are 8. The novel recombinations are extended, so that double-extended, so that double-stranded heteroduplex DNA stranded heteroduplex DNA molecules are created.molecules are created.

Page 44: Experimental Molecular Evolution

8. The recombination process is 8. The recombination process is repeated… repeated…

Page 45: Experimental Molecular Evolution

9. … until full-length double-9. … until full-length double-stranded heteroduplex DNA stranded heteroduplex DNA molecules are created. molecules are created.

Page 46: Experimental Molecular Evolution

10. The result is a library of 10. The result is a library of novel full-length genes which novel full-length genes which have different combinations of have different combinations of characteristics from the characteristics from the “parental” genes. “parental” genes.

etcetc… …

Page 47: Experimental Molecular Evolution

11. Test each recombinant for the 11. Test each recombinant for the desired property.desired property.

Page 48: Experimental Molecular Evolution
Page 49: Experimental Molecular Evolution