experimental investigation and mechanical …€¦ · p.b. senthil kumar assistant professor,...
TRANSCRIPT
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1383 [email protected]
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 8, Issue 8, August 2017, pp. 1383–1400, Article ID: IJMET_08_08_142
Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=8&IType=8
ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359
© IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION AND MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF
CARBON NANOTUBES/AA6063 ALUMINIUM METAL MATRIX COMPOSITE USING STIR
CASTING METHOD P.B. Senthil kumar
Assistant Professor, Department of Automobile Engineering,
Veltech Dr.RR & Dr.SR University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
R.Hushein, K.Logesh Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Veltech Dr.RR & Dr.SR University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
K.Inbarasan UG Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Veltech Dr.RR & Dr.SR University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT: Aluminium is one of the light metals and the most commonly used metal.
Aluminium is having electrical and thermal conductivity properties are very good and
also good corrosion resistance. Aluminium composites are used in various
applications like Automobiles, Aerospace, Marine structure applications, Building
and construction industry. The present work focusing on fabrication of AA6063
Aluminium matrix composites (AMCs) CNT reinforced by stir casting method. The
microstructure and mechanical properties of the fabricated AMCs are analyzed. The
mechanical properties like hardness and tensile strength will be tested for various
weight percentages of CNTs in the Aluminium matrix. The ANN model for physical
properties and tensile strength are going to be generating and using ANN models the
different properties of AMC’s will be predicted. The variation of cluster creation,
porosity segregation and other defects were analyzed by using scanning electron
microscope, hardness test and wear test with different structure will be studied.
Keywords: AA6063, AMC (Aluminium Matrix Composites), CNT (Carbon
Nanotubes), Mechanical Properties, SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope).
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes/AA6063
Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1384 [email protected]
Cite this Article: P.B.Senthilkumar, R.Hushein, K.Logesh and K.Inbarasan,
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon
Nanotubes/AA6063 Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method,
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology 8(8), 2017,
pp. 1376–1400.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=8&IType=8
1. INTRODUCTION Composite material is a material composed of two or more distinct phases (matrix phase and
reinforcing phase) and having bulk properties significantly different from those of any of the
constituents [1-3]. Many of common materials (metals, alloys, doped ceramics and polymers
mixed with additives) also have a small amount of dispersed phases in their structures,
however they are not considered as composite materials since their properties are similar to
those of their base constituents (physical property of steel are similar to those of pure iron)
[4]. Favorable properties of composites materials are high stiffness and high strength, low
density, high temperature stability, high electrical and thermal conductivity, adjustable
coefficient of thermal expansion, corrosion resistance, improved wear resistance etc [5].
Metal-matrix composites (MMCs), as light and strong materials, are very attractive for
application in different industries. Generally, regards to the mechanical properties, the
reinforcements results in higher strength and hardness, often at the expense of some ductility
[6-9].
AMC refers to the class of light weight high performance aluminium centric material
systems. The reinforcement in AMCs could be in the form of a few percent to 70 %. AMC
reinforced with particles and whiskers are widely used for High performance applications
such as in automotive, military, aerospace and electricity industries because of their improved
physical and mechanical properties In the composites relatively soft alloy like aluminium can
be made highly resistant by introducing predominantly hard but brittle particles such as
Al2O3 and SIC. Properties of AMCs can be tailored to the demands of different industrial
applications by suitable combinations of matrix, reinforcement and processing route [10].
Al materials composites (AMCs) reinforced with ceramic particulates, exhibit high
strength, hardness and elastic modules AMCs are one of the advanced engineering materials
that have been developed for weight-critical applications in the aerospace, and more recently
in the automotive industries due to their excellent combination of high specific strength and
better wear resistance [11-12].
Production and characterization of AA6061–B4C stir cast composite. This work focuses
on the fabrication of aluminum (6061-T6) matrix composites (AMCs) reinforced with various
weight percentage of B4C particulates by modified stir casting route. The wettability of B4C
particles in the matrix has been improved by adding K2TiF6 flux into the melt. The
microstructure and mechanical properties of the fabricated AMCs are analyzed. The optical
microstructure and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images reveal the homogeneous
dispersion of B4C particles in the matrix. The reinforcement dispersion has also been
identified with X-ray diffraction (XRD). The mechanical properties like hardness and tensile
strength have improved with the increase in weight percentage of B4C particulates in the
aluminum matrix [1, 13-15]
Artificial neural networks (ANN) have emerged as one of the useful artificial intelligence
concepts used in the various engineering applications. Due to their massively parallel
structure and ability to learn by example, ANN can deal with non-linear modeling for which
an accurate analytical solution is difficult to obtain [16]. ANN have already been used in
medical applications, image and speech recognition, classification and control of dynamic
P.B. Senthil kumar, R.Hushein, K.Logesh and K.Inbarasan
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1385 [email protected]
systems, among others; but only recently have they been used in modeling the mechanical
behavior of fiber-reinforced composite materials. This work is an attempt to reflect on the
work done in the mechanical modeling of fiber-reinforced composite materials using ANN
during the last decade [17-20].
Artificial neural networks applied to polymer composites Inspired by the biological
nervous system, an artificial neural network (ANN) approach is a fascinating mathematical
tool, which can be used to simulate a wide variety of complex scientific and engineering
problems [21]. A powerful ANN function is determined largely by the interconnections
between artificial neurons, similar to those occurring in their natural counterparts of biological
systems. Also in polymer composites, a certain amount of experimental results is required to
train a well-designed neural network. After the network has learned to solve the material
problems, new data from the similar domain can then be predicted without performing too
many, long experiments. The objective of using ANNs is also to apply this tool for systematic
parameter studies in the optimum design of composite materials for specific applications [22-
24]. In the present review, various principles of the neural network approach for predicting
certain properties of polymer composite materials are discussed. These include fatigue life,
wear performance, response under combined loading situations, and dynamic mechanical
properties. Additionally, the ANN approach has been applied to composite processing
optimizations. The goal of this review is to promote more consideration of using ANNs in the
field of polymer composite property prediction and design [3].
CNT reinforced light metal composites produced by melt stirring and by high pressure die
casting. Light metal matrix composites are of great interest due to their potential for reducing
CO2 emission through lightweight design e.g. in the automotive sector. Carbon nanotubes can
be considered as ideal reinforcements, due to their high strength, high aspect ratio and
thermo-mechanic properties. In this research, CNT reinforced light metal composites were
produced by melt stirring and by high pressure die casting, which can be both easily scaled
up. The light metal composites showed significantly improved mechanical properties already
at small CNT contents. The influence of CNT concentration on the composites was also
studied [4].
The objective of this work is to CNT reinforce aluminium composite by stir casting
method. Different weight % of MWCNTs has to be added to aluminium-6063 separately to
make aluminium composite and its mechanical properties have been investigated using tests
like Tensile, Hardness and XRD. The improvement of mechanical properties for both the
cases has to be compared with aluminium 6063. The ANN model for hardness and tensile
strength are going to be generated and using ANN models the properties of AMC’s will be
predicted.
2. MATERIAL USED
2.1. Aluminium Alloy AA6063 Aluminium alloys can be developed from one or a combination of metal forming process. The
mechanically worked after being cast and cannot be strengthened by precipitation hardening;
they are hardened primarily by cold working. Working the material densities it, adding tensile
strength but lowering malleability. Casting alloys are formed by a casting process that forms
alloys either continuously or into set shapes [4]. They include heat-treatable and non-heat-
treatable alloys, allowing more workability and higher amounts of alloying elements more
workability and higher amounts of alloying elements to be added but decreasing the alloy
[24].
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes/AA6063
Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1386 [email protected]
2.2. Carbon Nanotubes Carbon nanotubes are found in 1985.Fullerenes played vital role in discovery of carbon
nanotubes. They were double layered tubes having diameter about 30mm and were closed
from both ends. This was a major discovery which supported a lot in the electronics,
mechanics and chemistry. CNT are smallest molecule of graphite carbon with outstanding
characteristics. The main reason for introducing CNTs into light metal matrix composites is
enhancement of the mechanical properties like density and hardness [7].
3. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
3.1. Stir Casting Stir casting is a liquid state method of composites materials fabrication, in which a dispersed
phase (ceramic particles, short fibers) is mixed with a molten matrix metal by means of
mechanical stirring. The simplest and the most cost effective method of liquid state
fabrication is Stir Casting Shown in Figure 1&2.
Figure 1 Preheating of Al6063 Figure 2 Mixing of preheated MWCNT powder with molten A6063
Figure 3 Preparation of Sand Moulds
Stir casting involves adding particles into the melt in the crucible which is kept inside the
furnace. The melt is transferred to permanent moulds after stirring as shown in Figure 3,
Modified stir casting involves directly transferring the melt into a permanent mould with a
bottom pouring arrangement attached to the furnace as shown in Figure 4 &5.
Figure 4 Pouring of Molten Metal and Figure 5 Preparation of AL6063 and
Solidified Specimens (AL6063+MWCNT) Samples
P.B. Senthil kumar, R.Hushein, K.Logesh and K.Inbarasan
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1387 [email protected]
3.2. Artificial Neural Network The Inputs enter into the processing element from the upper left. The first step is to multiply
each of these inputs by their respective weighting factor [w(n)]. These modified inputs are
then fed into the summing function, which usually sums these products; however, many
different types of operations can be selected. The output of the summing function is then sent
into a transfer function, which turns this number into a real output (a 0 or a 1, -1 or +1 or
some other number) via some algorithm. The transfer function can also scale the output or
control its value via thresholds [6]. This output is then sent to other processing elements or an
outside connection, as dictated by the structure of the network.
3.3. Brinell Hardness Test The Brinell hardness test method consists of indenting the test material with a hardened steel
ball intender of diameter 5mm. The intender is forced into the test material under a maximum
load of 1000 kgf as shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6 Testing of samples in Brinell Hardness Machine
3.4. Tensile Test Tension test is carried out; to obtain the stress-strain diagram, to determine the tensile
properties and hence to get valuable information about the mechanical behaviour and the
engineering performance of the material [25]. Machining in the Lathe machine as shown in
Figure 7 and tensile specimen as shown in Fig.8. The major parameters that describe the
stress-strain curve obtained during the tension test are the tension tesion test are the tension
strength (UTS), yield strength (σy), Elastic modulus (E), percentage of elongation (∆L%), and
the reduction in area (RA%) can also be found by use of this testing technique [26].
Figure 7 Machining Operation in Lathe Figure 8 Preparation of Tensile Specimen
Machine as per ASTM B-557M
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes/AA6063
Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1388 [email protected]
3.5. X-RAY Diffraction Test XRD is a technique that is widely used in nano –technology. Applications range from phase
identification, quantification and determination of crystallite and particle size, all on nano-
scale level. English physicists Sir W.H. Bragg and his son Sir W.L. developed a relationship
in 1913 to explain why are cleavage faces of crystals appear to reflect X-ray beams at certain
angles of incidence (theta,θ). The variable d is the distance between atomic layers in a crystal,
and the variable lamda (λ) is the wavelength of the incident X-ray beam: n is an integer, X-ray
diffraction occurs at specific angle m(2θ) with respect to lattice spacing’s defined by bragg’s
law and is expressed as: n λ= 2dsinθ [4]. The atomic planes of a crystal cause an incident
beam of X-rays to interfere with one another as they leave the crystal. The phenomenon is
called X-ray diffraction. Diffraction occurs only when braggs law is satisfied condition for
constructive interference (x-rays1 & 2) from planes with spacing’d’ [6].
4. RESULT & DISCUSSION
4.1. Brinell Hardness The table 1 Shows the observed that for pure aluminium 6063 Maximum Hardness value
Achieved at 59.55(BHN). From the table 2, Shows the observed that for (Al+MWCNT) the
best obtained at 1% weight percentage of MWCNT i.e. Maximum Hardness Value obtained
for 1% weight percentage SWCNT is 62.118 BHN. The increasing trend of hardness strength
with increase in weight percentage of MWCNT up to 1% weight fraction. Beyond this weight
fraction the hardness trend started decreasing as the density of SWCNT particles in the melt
started decreasing thereby lowering the hardness. The best value of hardness comes out to be
of sample containing 1% MWCNT i.e. 62.118 BHN.
Table 1 Brinell Hardness Test For Pure Aluminium
Specimen Load (KGF)
Penetrator Diameter
(mm)
1st Trail (BHN)
2nd Trail
(BHN)
3rd Trail
(BHN)
4th Trail
(BHN)
5th Trail
(BHN)
Average (BHN)
AL 6063 1000 5 59.55 59.55 59.55 59.55 59.55 59.55
Table 2 Brinell Hardness Test For (Al+MWCNT) Samples
Specimen Load (KGF)
Penetrator Diameter
(mm)
1st Trail (BHN)
2nd
Trail (BHN)
3rd Trail (BHN)
4th Trail (BHN)
5th Trail (BHN)
Average (BHN)
0.25%
MWCNT 1000 5 63.66 63.66 55.67 59.55 59.55 60.41
0.75%
MWCNT 1000 5 59.55 63.66 63.66 59.55 59.55 61.19
1% MWCNT 1000 5 63.66 68.05 55.67 63.66 59.55 62.118
1.125%
MWCNT 1000 5 59.55 59.55 55.67 59.55 68.05 60.47
1.25%
MWCNT 1000 5 59.55 59.55 63.66 68.05 59.55 62.07
4.1.1. Brinell Hardness Test For (Al+MWCNT) Samples
Experiments have been conducted by varying weight fraction of MWCNT (0.25%, 0.75%,
1%, 1.125% and 1.25%). Hardness strength were recorded and tabulated. Hardness test has
P.B. Senthil kumar, R.Hushein, K.Logesh and K.Inbarasan
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1389 [email protected]
been conducted on each specimen using a load of 1000 kgf and a steel ball of diameter of
5mm. The result from table 1 shows the increasing trend of hardness strength with increase in
weight percentage of MWCNT up to 1% weight fraction. Beyond this weight fraction the
hardness trend started decreasing as MWCNT particles interact with each other leading to
clustering of particles and consequently settling down. Eventually the density of MWCNT
particles in the melt started decreasing thereby lowering the hardness. The best value of
hardness comes out to be samples containing 1% MWCNT i.e. 62.118BHN (B. SCALE).
4.2. Tensile Test The tensile properties of the Al 6063 and nano composite samples were going to be
determining in accordance with ASTM method, schematic representation as shown in Fig.9.
An experiment has been conducted by varying weight fraction of MWCNT (0.25%, 0.75%,
1%, 1.125% and 1.25%). Tensile test has to be conduct on each specimen using a Universal
tensile testing machine.
Figure 9 Dimensions of Tensile Specimen as per ASTM B-557M
Figure 10 Stress Vs Strain for Al6063 Samples
From the Fig. 10 it could be observe that for Pure Aluminium maximum ultimate tensile
strength (UTS) occurs at 99.44 MPa. Yield strength (σy) is at 70.42 Mpa. Due to this the
percentage elongation (∆L) of 3.36% is achieved.
Figure 11 Stress Vs Strain For (Al6063+0.25% MWCNT)
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes/AA6063
Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1390 [email protected]
From the Fig. 11, it could be observe that for (Al6063+0.25%MWCNT), ultimate tensile
strength (UTS) occurs at 107.45 MPa, Yield strength (σy) is at 54.59 Mpa. Due to this the
percentage elongation (∆L) of 4.0% is achieved.
Figure 12 Stress Vs Strain for (Al6063+0.75% MWCNT)
From the Fig.12, it could be observe that for(Al6063+0.75%MWCNT) Ultimate tensile
strength (UTS) occurs at110.66 Mpa. Yield strength (σy) is at 73.3 MPa. Due to this the
percentage elongation (∆L) of 4.80% is achieved.
Figure 13 Stress Vs Strain for (Al6063+1%MWCNT) Samples
From the Fig. 13, it could be observe that for (Al6063+1%MWCNT), Ultimate tensile
strength (UTS) occurs at 34.19 MPa, Yield strength (σy) is at 29.04 MPa. Due to this the
percentage elongation (∆L) of 2.72 % is achieved.
Figure 14 Stress Vs Strain for (Al6063+1.125%) Samples
P.B. Senthil kumar, R.Hushein, K.Logesh and K.Inbarasan
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1391 [email protected]
From the Fig. 14, it could be observe that for (Al6063+1.125%MWCNT), Ultimate tensile
strength (UTS) occurs at 98.25 MPa, Yield strength (σy) is at 70.15 MPa. Due to this the
percentage elongation (∆L) of 2.88 % is achieved.
Figure 15 Stress Vs Strain for (Al6063+1.25%) Samples
From the Fig.15, it could be observe that for(Al6063+1.25%MWCNT), Ultimate tensile
strength (UTS) occurs at 56.10 MPa, Yield strength (σy) is at 26.52 MPa. Due to this the
percentage elongation (∆L) of 4% is achieved. Shows the table 3 it could be observed that for
pure Al Maximum ultimate tensile strength (UTS) occurs at 99.44 Mpa, Yield strength (σy) is
at 70.42 Mpa with elongation of 3.36% is achieved.
Table 3 Tensile Test Results for Pure Aluminium
SAMPLE DIAMETER (mm)
AREA (mm²)
IGL (mm)
FGL (mm)
TENSILE STRENGTH
(Mpa)
YIELD STRENGTH
(Mpa)
% ΔL
Al 6063 12.5 124.69 62.5 64.60 99.44 70.42 3.36
From the table 4 it could be observe that for (Al6063+MWCNT) Maximum ultimate
tensile strength occurs at 110.66 Mpa, Yield strength (σy) is at 73.33 MPa with elongation of
4.80 % is achieved.
Table 4 Tensile Test Results For (Al6063+MWCNT) Samples
SAMPLES DIAMETER (mm)
AREA (mm²)
IGL (mm)
FGL (mm)
TENSILE STRENGT
H (mpa)
YIELD STRENGTH
(mpa) ΔL
0.25%MWCNT 12.5 124.69 62.5 65.0 107.45 54.59 4.0
0.75% MWCNT 12.5 124.69 62.5 65.5 110.66 73.33 4.80
1% MWCNT 12.5 124.69 62.5 64.2 34.19 29.04 2.72
1.125%
MWCNT 12.5 124.69 62.5 64.3 98.25 70.15 2.88
1.25% MWCNT 12.5 124.69 62.5 65.0 56.10 26.32 4.0
The Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) increases up to 110.66 Mpa while adding 0.75%
MWCNT with Al6063. With increasing amount of MWCNT i.e at 1% and 1.25%, strength
trend start decreasing and ductility gradually drops to a level similar to that of pure Al6063.
The maximum amount of energy required for breaking is observed for a composition of
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes/AA6063
Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1392 [email protected]
0.75% MWCNT incorporated and also the expenditure of fracture energy for the nano
composite with 0.75% MWCNT is higher than pure Al6063.
4.3. X-RAY Diffraction Test for Aluminium Matrix Composites
Figure 16 XRD image for Pure Aluminium
Table 5 Indexed parameters for Pure Aluminium
Pos. [°2Th.] Height [cts] FWHM Left [°2Th.] d-spacing [Å] Rel. Int. [%]
38.4391 2486.18 0.1968 2.34193 100.00
44.6722 1676.27 0.2460 2.02857 67.42
65.0430 211.39 0.2952 1.43399 8.50
78.1582 519.74 0.2400 1.22193 20.91
78.3973 305.37 0.1800 1.22183 12.28
82.3820 162.72 0.3000 1.16965 6.55
From table 5, the index peaks represents the XRD analysis of the Nano composites. The
highest peak position of without MWCNT Nano composites is 2486.18 counts and the peak
angle lays at 38.4391 and d-spacing 2.3419.
Figure 17 XRD Image for Al6063-0.25% MWCNT
P.B. Senthil kumar, R.Hushein, K.Logesh and K.Inbarasan
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1393 [email protected]
Table 6 Indexed parameters for Al6063-0.25% MWCNT
Pos. [°2Th.] Height [cts] FWHM Left [°2Th.]
d-spacing [Å] Rel. Int. [%]
38.3039 2583.34 0.1968 2.34988 100.00
44.5444 2167.30 0.2460 2.03410 83.90
64.9273 314.92 0.1968 1.43627 12.19
78.0433 470.89 0.2460 1.22446 18.23
82.2650 121.31 0.1968 1.17199 4.70
From table 6, the index peaks represents the XRD analysis of the Nano composites with
0.25% MWCNT. The highest peak position of with Al-0.25% MWCNT Nano composites is
2583.34 counts and the peak angle lays at 38.3039 and d-spacing 2.34988.
Figure 18 XRD Image for Al6063-0.75% MWCNT
Table 7 Indexed parameters for Al6063-0.75% MWCNT obtained from fig 4.11
Pos. [°2Th.] Height [cts] FWHM Left [°2Th.] d-spacing [Å] Rel. Int. [%]
38.3519 2510.62 0.2460 2.34705 100.00
44.5937 1354.36 0.2460 2.03196 53.95
64.9510 317.61 0.2460 1.43580 12.65
78.1050 520.19 0.1800 1.22263 20.72
78.3750 215.33 0.1200 1.22213 8.58
82.2967 152.76 0.1200 1.17065 6.08
From table 7, the index peaks represents the XRD analysis of the Nano composites with
0.75% MWCNT. The highest peak position of with Al-0.75% MWCNT Nano composites is
2510.62 counts and the peak angle lays at 38.3519 and d-spacing 2.34705.
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes/AA6063
Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1394 [email protected]
Figure 19 XRD Image for Al6063-1.0% MWCNT
Table 8 Indexed parameters for Al6063-1.0% MWCNT obtained from figure 4.12
Pos. [°2Th.] Height [cts] FWHM Left [°2Th.]
d-spacing [Å] Rel. Int. [%]
38.4060 2264.46 0.1968 2.34387 100.00
44.6441 1683.95 0.2460 2.02979 74.36
65.0078 314.78 0.2460 1.43468 13.90
78.1369 460.19 0.2460 1.22323 20.32
82.3379 121.35 0.1968 1.17114 5.36
From table 8, the index peaks represents the XRD analysis of the Nano composites with
1.0% MWCNT. The highest peak position of with Al-1.0% MWCNT Nano composites is
2264.46 counts and the peak angle lays at 38.4060 and d-spacing 2.34387.
Figure 20 XRD Image for Al6063-1.125% MWCNT
Table 9 Indexed parameters for Al6063-1.125% MWCNT
Pos. [°2Th.] Height [cts] FWHM Left [°2Th.] d-spacing [Å] Rel. Int. [%]
38.3887 2552.47 0.1968 2.34489 100.00
44.6279 1825.78 0.2460 2.03048 71.53
64.9894 410.54 0.2460 1.43505 16.08
78.1153 421.39 0.2460 1.22351 16.51
82.3357 118.18 0.1968 1.17116 4.63
P.B. Senthil kumar, R.Hushein, K.Logesh and K.Inbarasan
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1395 [email protected]
From table 9, the index peaks represents the XRD analysis of the Nano composites with
1.125% MWCNT. The highest peak position of with Al-1.125% SWCNT Nano composites is
2552.47counts and the peak angle lays at 38.3887 and d-spacing 2.34489.
Figure 21 XRD Image for Al6063-1.25% MWCNT
Table 10 Indexed parameters for Al6063-125% MWCNT
Pos. [°2Th.] Height [cts] FWHM Left [°2Th.]
d-spacing [Å] Rel. Int. [%]
38.4952 2509.22 0.1968 2.33864 100.00
44.7414 1555.44 0.2460 2.02560 61.99
65.0936 291.79 0.1968 1.43300 11.63
78.2095 335.62 0.3000 1.22126 13.38
78.4650 185.58 0.1800 1.22095 7.40
82.4240 144.48 0.2400 1.16916 5.76
82.7167 79.27 0.1800 1.16866 3.16
From table 10, the index peaks represents the XRD analysis of the Nano composites with
1.25% MWCNT. The highest peak position of with Al-1.25% MWCNT Nano composites is
2509.22counts and the peak angle lays at 38.4952 and d-spacing 2.33864. From the table 11,
the penetration of X-ray increases with addition of MWCNT This shows that the lightweight
materials with high strength occurs on Al6063 Aluminium alloy. So Al nano composites
developed to increase high strength to low weight ratio used widely in aerospace, aircraft and
automotive industries.
Table 11 Comparison of XRD Results For (Al6063+MWCNT) Samples
S.No Material Position (2θθθθ) Height(cts) d-spacing
1 Al6063 38.4391 2486.18 2.34193
2 Al+0,25%MWCNT 38.3039 2583.34 2.34988
3 Al+0.75%MWCNT 38.3519 2510.62 2.34705
4 Al+1,0%MWCNT 38.4060 2264.46 2.34387
5 Al+1.125%MWCNT 38.3887 2552.47 2.34489
6 Al+1.25%MWCNT 38.4957 2509.22 2.33864
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes/AA6063
Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1396 [email protected]
4.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy
Figure 22 SEM images of Pure Aluminium Figure 23 SEM image for Al6063-
0.25%MWCNT
Figure 24 SEM image for Al6063- Figure 25 SEM image for Al6063-
0.75%MWCNT 1%MWCNT
Figure 26 SEM image for Al6063- Figure 27 SEM image for Al6063-
1.125%MWCNT 1.25%MWCNT
P.B. Senthil kumar, R.Hushein, K.Logesh and K.Inbarasan
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1397 [email protected]
Figure 22 shows the SEM image of Pure Aluminium, the microstructure shows the surface
structure of the same material. Fig.23 shows the SEM image of Al with 0.25% MWCNT
added. From the image small presence of MWCNT can be noticed when compare on the
previous image. Fig.24 shows the SEM image of Al with 0.75% MWCNT added. From the
image small presence of MWCNT can be noticed when compare on the previous image.
Fig.25 shows the SEM image of Al with 1% MWCNT added. From the image more presence
of MWCNT can be noticed when compare on the previous image. Fig.26 shows the SEM
image of Al with 1.125% MWCNT added. From the image more presence of MWCNT can be
noticed when compare on the previous image. Fig.27 shows the SEM image of Al with 1.25%
MWCNT added. From the image more presence of MWCNT can be noticed when compare
on the previous image.
4.5. Training and Validation of ANN
Figure 28 Comparison between target value and predicted value
To test the generalization performance of the trained network in training and validating
processes, the experimental values were compared to the predicted values resulted from ANN
as shown in Fig.28. The experimental versus predicted values of training dataset, as it can be
observed, the predictability of ANN fits very well. However, the main quality indicator of a
neural network is its generalization ability, its ability to predict accurately the output of
unseen data and this was achieved by validating dataset.
Table 12 Comparison between Measured Values and Predicted Values Using ANN
Composition Measured value Predicted value using ANN Model
Hardness(BHN) Tensile strength(Mpa)
Hardness(BHN) Tensile strength(Mpa)
0.25%MWCNT 60.41 107.45 60.4702 98.2500
1%MWCNT 62.118 34.19 62.0028 56.1088
1.125%MWCNT 60.47 98 60.4700 98.2418
1.25%MWCNT 62.07 56.10 62.0700 56.1000
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes/AA6063
Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1398 [email protected]
The dataset was obtained from stir casting process and considered as cast samples without
any further post-treatment except cleaning and cutting of the obtained bars. To test the
generalization performance of the trained network in training and validating processes, the
experimental values were compared to the predicted values resulted from ANN. The
experimental versus predicted values of training dataset is shown in table 12. As it can be
observed, the predictability of ANN fits very well. However, the main quality indicator of a
neural network is its generalization ability, its ability to predict accurately the output of
unseen data and this was achieved by validating dataset.
5. CONCLUSION In this present work reinforcement of MWCNT with aluminium by stirs casting method. The
different composition of MWCNT (0.25%, 0.75%, 1.0%, 1.125% and 1.25%) reinforced with
Aluminium6063 separately to make aluminium matrix composites and the improvement of
mechanical properties has been compared with Pure Al6063 using hardness test, Tensile Test
and XRD test. The improved results for hardness have been obtained at Al-1% wt fraction
MWCNTs (62.118 BHN). When compared to the pure Al6063 i.e. (59.55BHN). The
improved results for tensile strength have been obtained at Al6063-0.75% wt fraction
MWCNTs (110.66 Mpa). When compared to the pure Al6063 i.e. (99.44 Mpa). The addition
of MWCNTs with Al6063, increase the impact resistance of the reinforced Al6063 by
reducing the cracks and voids in the crystal lattice which was observed in the XRD analysis.
From the SEM images the presence of MWCNT could be clearly seen on each images, it was
observed that presence of MWCNT into Al6063. The use of ANN model prediction of
hardness and tensile strength for Al6063-MWCNT reinforced composite materials. The ANN
gives satisfactory results when compared to the experimental values.
REFERENCE
[1] Kalaiselvan K, Murugan N and Siva Parameswaran, Production and characterization of
AA6061– 4C stir cast composite’, Journal of Material Design, Volume. 23, pp.4004-
4009, 2011.
[2] K. Logesh and V.K.Bupesh Raja, Experimental Studies on Impact Strength of AA5052 -
MWCNT/LDH Reinforced Hybrid Fibre Metal Laminate, International Journal of
Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 8(7), 2017, pp. 784–794.
[3] Hany El Kadi., ‘Modeling the mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced polymeric
Composite materials using artificial neural networks’ journal of composite structures
Volume. 73, pp.1-23, 2006.
[4] K.Logesh, V.K.Bupesh Raja, J.Veerendra Rayudu, N.Sai Ganesh, R.Ali Azmath Shaik, A
Review on Sheet Metal Forming and its Latest Development of Sandwich Materials,
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology 8(8), 2017,pp. 369–385.
[5] Zhank Z and Friedrich K., ‘Artificial neural networks applied to polynmer composites’,
Journal of Composites Science and Technology, Volume. 63, pp. 2029-2049, 2003.
[6] K.Logesh, V.K.Bupesh Raja, B.Gowthama Rajan, V.Ramani, Experimental Studies on
Surface Morphology of Nano clay and Mg-Al Layered Double Hydroxide Using Atomic
Force Microscopy and EDAX Analysis, International Journal of ChemTech Research,
Volume.10 No.3, pp 385-394, 2017.
[7] Qianqian Li , Christian A. Rottmair, Robert Fand Singer., „CNT reinforced light metal
Composites produced by melt stirring and by high pressure die casting’, Journal of
Composites Science and Technology, 2010.
[8] K.Logesh, V.K.Bupesh Raja, B.Dinesh, M.Rajesh Kumar, S.Bharath, Experimental
Investigation and Finite Element simulation of Tensile Behaviour of AA5052/GF/AA5052
P.B. Senthil kumar, R.Hushein, K.Logesh and K.Inbarasan
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1399 [email protected]
Fibre Metal Laminate (FML), International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and
Technology 8(8), 2017, pp. 324-333.
[9] Shin Suzuki, Constructive function-approximation by three-layer artificial, Journal of
Neural Network, Volume. 11, pp. 1049-105, 2008.
[10] K.Logesh, V. K. Bupesh Raja. R.Velu, Experimental Investigation for Characterization of
Formability of Epoxy based Fiber Metal Laminates using Erichsen Cupping Test Method,
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Volume 8(33), DOI:
10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i33/72244, December 2015.
[11] Adel Mahamood Hassan, Abdalla Alrashdan, Mohammed T. Hayajneh, Ahmad Turki
Mayyas, Prediction of density, porosity and hardness in aluminum–copper-based
composite materials using artificial neural network’, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, Volume. 209, pp. 894-899, 2009.
[12] K.Logesh, D.Surryaprakash, N.Dilip Raja, M.Rajesh Kumar, Inflation of Environmental –
Friendly Machining Parameters on Aluminium 6063 In Its Annealed and Unannealed
form, International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering IJMME-IJENS
Volume:15 No:05.
[13] Carreno-Morelli E, Yank J, Couteau E, Hernadi K and Schaller R, Carbon nanotube/
magnesium Composite’ Journal of Phys. Stat. sol. Volume. 201. No 8 pp.53-55.
[14] K.Logesh, V.K.Bupesh Raja, P.Sasidhar, An experiment about Morphological Structure
of Mg-Al Layered Double Hydroxide Using Field Emission Scanning Electron
Microscopy with EDAX Analysis, International Journal of ChemTech Research,
Volume.8, No.3, pp 1104-1108, 2015.
[15] Hashim J,Looney L,Hashmi M.S.J., Metal matrix Composites: production by the stir
casting method’ ‟Journal of Metal Processing Technology, Vol.92-93, pp. 1-7, 1999.
[16] Sajjadi S.A, Ezatpour H,R and Torabi Parizi M., Comparison of microstructure and
mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy/Al2O3 composites fabricated by stir and
compo-casting process, Journal of Material and Desing, Volume. 34, pp. 106-111, 2011.
[17] P.Sathyaseelan, K.Logesh, M.Venkatasudhahar, N.Dilip Raja, Experimental and Finite
Element Analysis of Fibre Metal Laminates (FML’S) Subjected to Tensile, Flexural and
Impact Loadings with Different Stacking Sequence, International Journal of Mechanical
& Mechatronics Engineering IJMME-IJENS Volume:15 No:03.
[18] Abbasipour B, Niroumand B, and Monir vaghef S.M., Compocasting of A356-CNT
Composite, Journal of Transaction of Nonferrous Metals of China, Volume.20, pp. 1561-
1566, 2010.
[19] K.Logesh, P.Muralinath, N.Poyyamozhi,N.Dilip Raja, A.Yassar Dawood, Optimization of
Cutting Factors Which influence Temperature on Tip of Tool in response to Surface
Finish for an Aluminium Alloy AL6063 during Turning Process on CNC Lathe,
International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering IJMME-IJENS
Volume:14 No:06.
[20] K. Logesh, V.K.Bupesh Raja, Investigation of Mechanical Properties of
AA8011/PP/AA1100 Sandwich Materials, International Journal of ChemTech Research,
Volume.6, No.3, pp 1749-1752, May-June 2014.
[21] M.Venkatasudhahar, N.Dilipraja, P.Mathiyalagan, S.Venkata Subba Reddy,
P.Sathyaseelan, K. Logesh, Finite Element Analysis of Fatigue Life of Spot Welded Joint
and the Influence of Sheet Thickness and Spot Diameter, International Journal of
Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering IJMME-IJENS Volume:14 No:06.
[22] K.Logesh, V.K.Bupesh Raja, R.Arun Raj, P.B.Senthilkumar, A Review of Recent Trends
on Reinforcement of Fibre Metal Laminates with Nanoclay and Multi Walled Carbon
Nanotubes, International Journal ChemTech Research, Volume.10 No.3, pp 395-399,
2017.
Experimental Investigation and Mechanical Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes/AA6063
Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite using Stir Casting Method
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 1400 [email protected]
[23] Mathew Alphonse, V.K.Bupesh Raja, K.Logesh, N.Murugunachippan, Evolution and
Recent Trends in Friction Drilling Technique and the Application of Thermography,
Frontiers in Automobile and Mechanical Engineering, IOP Publishing, IOP Conf. Series:
Materials Science and Engineering 197 (2017) 012058 doi:10.1088/1757-
899X/197/1/012058.
[24] K. Logesh, V. K. Bupesh Raja, Formability analysis for enhancing forming parameters in
AA8011/PP/AA1100 sandwich materials, International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, DOI 10.1007/s00170-015-7832-5, 2015.
[25] F.Rikhtegar. S.G.Shabestari, H.Saghafian, Microstructural evaluation and mechanical
properties of Al-CNT nanocomposites produced by different processing methods, Journal
of Alloys and Compounds, Volume 723, 5 November 2017, Pages 633-641.
[26] A.A.Najimi, H.R.Shahverdi, Effect of milling methods on microstructures and mechanical
properties of Al6061-CNT composite fabricated by spark plasma sintering, Materials
Science and Engineering: A, Volume 702, 15 August 2017, Pages 87-95.
[27] Chandra Shekar, N B D Pattar and Y Vijaya Kumar, Optimization of Machining
Parameters in Turning of AL6063T6 Through Design of Experiments. International
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 2016, pp. 96–104
[28] S.Dhivakaran, M.Sudhahar and P.Vijayakumar, Effect of Die Design on Mechanical
Properties of Hot Pressed 6063 Alloy, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering
and Technology (IJMET) Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2017, pp 426-432