experimental and modeling results for flow - boilers (and...

29
Experimental and Modeling Results for Flow- Boilers (and Flow Condensers) that Operate in Annular Regimes and in High Heat-Flux Modes Narain, A., Naik, R., Kivisalu, M., Gorgitrattanagul, P., Bhasme, S. and Ranga Prasad, H. Michigan Tech Abstract Number HT2016-7464, Proceedings of 2016 ASME Summer Heat Transfer Conference, July 10-14, Washington DC Acknowledgments Grants: NSF-CBET-1402702, NSF-CBET-1033591, NASA-NNX10AJ59G

Upload: hoangdiep

Post on 01-Feb-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Experimental and Modeling Results for Flow-Boilers (and Flow Condensers) that Operate in

    Annular Regimes and in High Heat-Flux Modes

    Narain, A., Naik, R., Kivisalu, M., Gorgitrattanagul, P., Bhasme, S. and Ranga Prasad, H.

    Michigan TechAbstract Number HT2016-7464, Proceedings of 2016 ASME

    Summer Heat Transfer Conference, July 10-14, Washington DCAcknowledgments

    Grants: NSF-CBET-1402702, NSF-CBET-1033591, NASA-NNX10AJ59G

  • Talk Outline

    Millimeter-scale Flow Boilers (and Condensers) Broad Outline

    o Applications and Motivationso Proposed Innovative Operations

    Experimental and Modeling /Computational Results for Innovative Flow-boilers

    Modeling/Computational Details Conclusions

    2

  • Examples of Contemporary Applications Needing Innovation

    Ground-based miniaturization - requires use of millimeter scale hydraulic diameters and flow rates that lead to shear driven flow

    Space - requires such devices at all hydraulic diameters Handling of high heat loads at high heat-fluxes is desired Low weight and size requirements typically need to be met

    Electronics/Data Center Coolinghttp://www.pgal.com/portfolio/rice-university-data-center

    Space Based Thermal Management Systems and Power Generation Cycles

    http://spaceflightsystems.grc.nasa.gov

    3

    Innovation for shear/pressure driven flow-boilers and flow-condensers

  • Challenges with Traditional Shear/Pressure Driven Boiling Flows (mm-scale devices)

    Traditional to shear/pressure driven operational challenges (channels heated from below) Loss of buoyancy assisted nucleate boiling and associated heat transfer degradation Increased lengths of ineffective non-annular regimes Lack of repeatability due to extreme sensitivities

    4

    Dh

  • Proposed innovative mm-scale flow-boilers:How do they address the identified challenges?

    Key Ideas Controlled recirculation of vapor (at negligible pumping power) ensures annular flow

    regimes. Induced resonant pulsations in the vapor & liquid phases allow low energy acoustics

    mediated formation of: standing waves of large amplitudes on micron-scale liquidfilm flows. This leads to very high heat flux operations.

    Interactions with adsorbed layer on the wetting heat-exchange surface allowsnucleate boiling type high heat-flux values through stable sticking/dwelling of thelow-pressure wave-trough regions and induced convective motions.

    TopView

    Innovative Boiler

    Wavy Annular Regime

    Wavy Annular (mostly) Bubbly/Large Bubble Bubbly

    Flow Direction

    Non Annular Flow Regimes (mostly liquid)

    Traditional Boiler

    SideView

    TopView

    InletExitRecirculating Vapor

    LiquidVaporAll liquid

    inlet

    qw(t)

    ExitingVapor

    Vapor Pulsator

    PulsatileLiquid Flow

    Wavy Annular Regime (mostly)

    XA* XNA

    5

  • 6

    Innovative Annular Flow Boiling Basics

    Annular(with nucleation)

    Annular(suppressed nucleation)

    2-D Simulations are made available(for the first time) for this x>0 region.

    x = 0

    Vapor

    LiquidNon-pulsatile

    How thin should this be ?Vapor recirculation rate = ?

    How CHF/Dry-out instabilitycan be avoided?

    x

    Pulsatile Liquid

    VaporLiquidVapor N-IF

    IFVapor Exit

    LiquidExit

    Steady Heating

    Closed end (for vapor acoustics enabled

    formation of interfacial standing

    waves )

  • Flow Physics Hypotheses for Pulsatile Boiler and Condenser Operations

    The three intersecting circles represent: interaction zones of nm-scale, mm-scale, and macro-scale phenomena.

    Between the liquid-vapor interface and the adsorbed layer, at the troughs, reduced pressure and shear allow enabling convective motion. The low-pressure is enabled both by the surface-tension and curvature effects as well as by adsorbed (yellow) layer through disjoining pressure effects.

    Nucleation (of bubbles) is suppressed for thin annular boiling on wetting (or super-hydrophilic) surfaces yet the contact-line physics (Stephan et al. 2012; etc.)advantages of nucleating bubbles are retained.

    Near interface schematic of instantaneous spatial film thickness profile

    Time-varying film thickness profileat location x = x*

    LV

    *

    (x,t)

    x=x*

    x

    Mv(x,t)

    ML(x,t)x

    **ads

    Adsorbed layerads 100-200 nm

    x2

    x1 L

    V

    (x*): Time-averaged thickness at x=x*

    t = 1/fp

    t

    tSignificant

    throughflow

    7

  • Motivation: Why is pool boiling effective when buoyancy is present?

    This physics is being used by the thin film flow-boiler to reproduce similar convection during part of the waves time-period (as it approaches wetting-surface) but throughout the device - to obtain high heat flux with through flows.

    Very high heat flux at the contact line (of an initially growing and subsequently shrinking and detaching vapor bubble) are experimentally observed (Stephan, et al., 2012). Disjoining pressure assisted low-pressure in the micro-layer liquid films enable vigorous convective motion.

    y

    x

    Liquid

    or

    Solid

    VaporBubble

    r

    Heat

    Macro region

    Adsorbedlayer

    Motion depending on advancing or receding contact line

    Micro regionContact line

    qw(r,t)

    8

  • Experimental Evidence of Significant Heat-flux Enhancements for Pulsatile Flows as Opposed to Non-pulsatile Flows

    Characteristics of Experimentally Observed Pulsatile Flows: Much thinner mean film thickness achieved by pulsations (10 micro-meters). Controlled amplitude and frequency (1-15 Hz) for large amplitude standing waves. Heat-flux enhancement over entire 0 x L : Ongoing Expt.

    q40 cm(t)

    h =

    2 m

    m

    Steady HeatingHeat Flux Meter

    VaporLiquidVapor

    N-IFIF

    40 cm

    x

    Liquid

    q40 cm(t)Steady Cooling

    h =

    6 m

    m

    Cold Water FlowHeat Flux Meter

    VaporLiquidFC-72

    Vapor

    N-IFIF

    40 cm

    x

    9

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2

    0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3 3.6

    Mea

    sure

    d Lo

    cal H

    eat-F

    lux

    (W/c

    m2 )

    Measured Pulsation Amplitude (kPa)

    3.0 Hz Imposed Fluctuations, Innovative Flow Boiler

    qW (x = 40 cm)data

    qW (x = 40 cm) trendEn

    hanc

    emen

    t

    No Imposed Pulsations

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Ti

    me

    -Ave

    rage

    d H

    eat F

    lux

    Mea

    sure

    d at

    X =

    40

    cm (W

    /cm

    2 )

    28.4 Hz Imposed Fluctuations, Innovative Condenser

    10.6 Hz Imposed Fluctuations, Innovative Condenser

    Pressure Amplitude at Heat Flux Meter location (kPa)No Imposed Pulsations

    Expected Forthcoming experimental

    results

  • 10

    First-principles basedsimulations (DNS & scientific)

    Simplified results with approximate correlations

    Empirically obtained/adjusted correlations

    1D design solver

    New Modeling Approach for Steady Innovative Operations

    q"w(x) is positive for boiling &negative for condensation

    x

    q"w(x)

    Boiling Condensationh

    x

    Definitions:

    qw" x k11yp

    hx (w(x) sat(p0)

    Nux hx .hk1

    ; qw" (x) = qw" .q(x)

    w(x) sat(p0) .w x ; x xh

    Bl qw"

    G.hfg; Ja Cp1.T

    k1; X x Mv

    Min

    yp=0

  • 11

    New Modeling Approach for Steady Innovative Operations (Contd.)

    --- Temp. Prescription

    --- Heat flux Prescription

    Boiler (+)Condenser(-)

    dXdx

    (x)

    NuxJa

    Pr1.

    1ReTV

    .12

    . w(x)

    Bl.q(x

    Combined solutions of Eq. (1) and Eq. (2) typically yieldspatial variations in X, hx etc.

    xNu 2 2

    x in1 1 1

    JaNu X, , Re , ,Pr

    2 2x in

    1 1

    Nu X,Bl,Re , ,

    --- Temp. Prescription

    --- Heat flux Prescription

    Experiments and/or DNS based correlations

    Eq. (1)

    Eq. (2)

  • 12

    Experimental/Modeling/Computations are given in:

    Published scientific papers:

    Kivisalu, M. T., Gorgitrattanagul, P., and Narain, A., (2014), International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 75, 381-398.

    Naik, R., Narain, A., Mitra, S., (2016) Numerical Heat Transfer, part B: Fundamentals, 69(6), 473-494.

    Naik, R., Narain, A., (2016) Numerical Heat Transfer, part B: Fundamentals, 69(6), 495-510.

    Papers on correlations-based design tools:

    Published: Narain, A., Naik, R.R., Ravikumar, S., Bhasme, S.S, (2015) Journal of Thermal Engineering, 1,

    pp. 307-321.

    Submitted: Ranga Prasad, H., Narain, A., Bhasme, S.S., Naik, R.R, (2016) International Journal of Transport

    Phenomena.

  • DNS Modeling Requires Inlet ConditionsApproach: Assume Adiabatic Flows Followed by Different

    Prior Heating Conditions Leading to Uniform Heating

    13

  • (b)(c)

    (a) Plot of the steady film thickness profile (x) for a transverse gravity case of gy=-g.(b) Cross-sectional profiles for x-component of velocity uI, at xp = 0.02 & (c) Cross-sectional profiles for Pressure pI at xp = 0.02 m . (Run parameters: Fluid FC-72, U = 1 m/s, p0 = 105.1 kPa, T = 10C,channel height = 2 mm)

    Steady Flow Boiling Results Based on DNS

    y=(x)

    14

    (x)

    x=0.02 m

    y

    x

    Vapor Liquid

    I = 2

    I = 1

    (a)

    Dis

    tanc

    e fro

    m h

    eate

    d su

    rface

    , y (m

    )

    Dis

    tanc

    e fr

    om h

    eate

    d su

    rfac

    e, y

    (m)

    Velocity, uI (m/s) @ xp = 0.02m (I 1 or 2)Pressure, pI (m/s) @ xp = 0.02m (I 1 or 2)

    Film

    Thi

    ckne

    ss,

    (m)

    Distance along the length of the channel, xp (m)

  • Correlations are being developed for annular boiling.(On-going activity/Sample Reported)

    Steady Flow Boiling Results Based on DNS (Contd.)

    15

    Distance along the length of the channel, xp (m)

    Dis

    tanc

    e fr

    om th

    e he

    ated

    surf

    ace,

    y (m

    m)

    Velo

    city

    mag

    nitu

    de (m

    /s)

    h =

  • 16

    Figure: (a) Plot of the Heat Transfer Coefficient vs Non-Dimensional Distance (b) Plot of Heat Transfer Coefficient vs Quality (Run parameters: Fluid FC-72, U = 1 m/s, p0 = 105.1 kPa, T = 10C, channel height = 2 mm)For xp > xe

    p prior heating method effects are no longer present

    Steady Flow Boiling Results Based on DNS (Contd.)

    (a) (b)

    xx

    1

    h .hNuk

    , non-dimensional pressure gradients, etc. are being correlated in forms discussed earlier.

    xe

    xe xep/h,where xe

    p is heating methodassociated entrance length

    Xe

  • Signature of Instability in Steady Base Flow: Energy Transfer Mechanisms and Flow Variables

    Analyzing the steady base flows features for a number of cases: In the absence of transverse gravity, xA|0g corresponds to the extremum in the net mechanical work

    terms per unit width, transferred primarily as the sum of net pressure work per unit width (x) terms (PWL-conv & PWL-int) & interfacial viscous work per unit width (x) term VWL-int. These are dissipated by equal and opposite outgoing net internal viscous dissipation per unit width term VDL. These are the predominant terms in the energy transfer mechanisms.

    In the presence of transverse gravity, xA|1g approximately corresponds to the maximum associated with peaking and dropping nature of the characteristic wave speed. Its estimate provides an upper bound.

    Plot of significant Energy Transfer Mechanism Terms in the presence of transverse gravity

    Plot of Characteristic Wave Speed and Viscous Dissipation rates in the presence of transverse gravity

    17

    xA|1g

    xA|0g

    xA|0g

    XA NA-A transition location

    Cha

    ract

    eris

    tic S

    peed

    , u(m

    /s)

  • 18

    Instability analysis gives Xcr|NA-A & steady solution gives 0.Xcr|NA-A & 0 are being correlated and reported in IJTP 2016/2017 and JTEN 2016/2017

    papers. Known correlations allow v-recirc to be adjusted to satisfy:

    Xin > Xcr|NA-A & keep 0 O (100m)

    Steady/Unsteady Flow Boiling Results Based on DNS (Contd.)

    Vapor Recirculation

    Vapor

    Inlet

    Annular

    Non-annular

    Xin Xcr|NA-AVapor Recirculation

    Inlet

    VaporAnnular Liquid

    XinXcr|NA-A

    v-recirc

    0Xin > Xcr|NA-A

    Xin < Xcr|NA-A

  • Unsteady Simulations: Instability Identification Capability

    Unsteady flow streamline patterns

    Run parameters: Fluid FC72, Inlet Speed U = 1m/s, Temperature Difference T = 20 C, Channel height h = 2 mm, gy = -9.81 m/s2

    19

    Velo

    city

    mag

    nitu

    de (m

    /s)

    Not available for Flow-boiling. Expected to be analogous to the ones in flow-condensation.

  • We have proposed simulations-experiments synthesis based heat transfer coefficient (HTC) correlations (J. Therm. Sci. & Engg. App., 2015) for non-pulsatile annular condensing flows.

    Parameter Space: 800 Rein 23,000, 0.005 JaPr1

    0.021, 0.000466 21

    0.01095,

    0.012013 21 0.03898, 376491 25520263

    Non-Dimensional hx or Nux correlation for Non-pulsatile case

    = 0.1 (1 X)0.590.1221

    0.3 21

    0.73 21

    0.069for X|1 X 1

    Non-Dimensional hx or Nux correlation (Pulsatile, ongoing)

    | = + % ,

    Xcr-A|1gcorrelation

    X|1 = 1 1.78 0.021

    0.564 21

    0.42 21

    0.335

    Above correlations are in reasonable agreement with existing HTC correlations and flow-regime maps and with our own experiments.

    Fundamental Modeling/Simulation Supported Correlation: Flow-Condensation

    20

  • Parameter Space: 616.5 Rein 9880.7, 0.0048 JaPr1

    0.0424, 0.00466 21

    0.0097, 0.0216 21 0.0295, 0.5 Xin 0.86

    Non-Dimensional hx or Nux correlation for Non-pulsatile case

    = 1.13 X1.6520.07761

    0.0963 21

    0.423 21

    0.4833for X 1

    Non-Dimensional hx or Nux correlation (Pulsatile, ongoing)

    | = + % ,

    Xcr-A|1gcorrelation

    Forthcoming for Flow-boiling. Result types are analogous to the ones for flow condensation.

    Fundamental Modeling/Simulation Supported Correlation: Flow-Boiling

    21

  • Channel gap, h 2 to 4 mmChannel Length, L 10 to 100 cmInlet Velocity, U 0.1 to 3 m/sInlet Pressure, pin 1 to 2 barVapor Refrigerant FC72, R113, etc.

    Modeling / DNS CFD Approach Outline(for Annular Flow Boiling)

    22

  • Simulation Tool Development 2D/Engineering 1D

    Governing Equations : Mass, momentum and energy equations in the fluid Interface Conditions : Flow physics restrictions on mass-momentum-energy transfer,

    definition of normal component of the surface velocity & continuity of tangential velocity, and thermodynamic restrictions

    23

    P

    P

    m

    m

    x

    Vapor

    Liquid

    For 1-D (mass and momentum balance is solved for the chosen vapor velocity profile)

    Thin film approximation (analytical solution of momentum and energy balance are used)

    Wall for channel geometry or axis of symmetry for cylindrical tube.

    Heat transferred

  • Single phase domain approach solves CFD for each phase on COMSOL using FEM all governing equations

    Solutions of the two domains talk to each other through interface conditions arrange on MATLAB/COMSOL program. The talk results from embedded interface conditions in the CFD formulation for each domain

    One of the interface conditions is the well known Interface Tracking Equation which is solved on MATLAB on a separate x-grid (or x-y grid for 2-D Level-set or x-y-z grid for 3-D Level-set). For unsteady simulation, the grid is fixed for a set of time-instants, but changes with marker time-instant (current time instant).

    Scientific CFD Simulation Tool Development

    24

    InterfaceLiquid

    TW(x) or q''W(x) heating condition

    T = Tsat (p0)

    p = pexit

    Interface

    VaporT = Tsat (p0)

    Velocity - UT = Tsat (p0)

    p0B

    C

    Internal Triangular Mesh

    A

    uVi

    vVi

    Lip Li

    Lcomp

  • Inlet Condition-Extended Prior to Inlet & Assume Different Prior Heating Condition

    25

  • Conclusions

    Innovations proposed and demonstrated for mm-scale boilers and condensers.

    Experimental and modeling support structure has been developed.

    26

  • Thank you!Questions?

    27

  • Governing Equations

    28

    Two dimensional flow with = xI + yI and = uI + vI

    Continuity EquationIt

    + . = 0 Momentum Equation

    I

    + . = + Ig + I2

    Energy Equation

    ICpII + . I = kI

    2I

    Back

  • Interface Conditions

    29

    Explicit interface definition - x, t = y x, t = 0Unit normal at any point on the interface, when directed from the liquid towards the vapor, is denoted by / Continuity of tangential velocities - 1

    u2i = u1i (v2

    i v1i )

    Normal component of momentum balance - 1p1i = p2i + mp 2

    12

    11

    + s. s. + .

    Tangential component of momentum balance - 1 . = . + s.

    Kinematic and energy constraints on interfacial mass flux and its equality - 2mVKp 2 2

    pi s .

    mLKp 1 1

    pi s .

    mEnergyp

    1hfg

    k1 1np

    i

    k2 2np

    i

    mLKp = mVK

    p = mEnergyp mp

    Thermodynamic Restrictions - 21i 2i sat p2i

    Back

    Experimental and Modeling Results for Flow-Boilers (and Flow Condensers) that Operate in Annular Regimes and in High Heat-Flux ModesTalk OutlineSlide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12DNS Modeling Requires Inlet ConditionsApproach: Assume Adiabatic Flows Followed by Different Prior Heating Conditions Leading to Uniform HeatingSlide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Simulation Tool Development 2D/Engineering 1DScientific CFD Simulation Tool DevelopmentInlet Condition-Extended Prior to Inlet & Assume Different Prior Heating ConditionConclusionsThank you!Questions?Governing EquationsInterface Conditions