experiment: davy graf, françoise molitor, and klaus ensslin solid state physics, eth zürich,...
TRANSCRIPT
Experiment:Davy Graf, Françoise Molitor,
and Klaus EnsslinSolid State Physics, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
Christoph Stampfer, Alain Jungen, and Christofer Hierold
Micro and Nanosystems, ETH ZürichTheory:
Ludger WirtzInstitute for Electronics, Microelectronics,
and Nanotechnology, Lille
Spatially resolved Raman spectroscopy
of single- and few-layer graphene
1 12
66
42 m
SiO2
1200 1600 2000 2400 2800Raman shift (cm -1)
Inte
nsity
(a
.u)
Motivation
1. • Investigate the 3D to 2D crossover in graphite.• Probe electronic and vibrational properties of few-layer, double-layer and single-layer graphene with double resonant Raman scattering.
Motivation
2 µm
1 m1
12
SiO2
Scanning force microscope
Optical microscope
0.4
0
SFM height (nm)
0.60.40.20Lateral position (m)
→ Raman spectroscopy:characterize by optical means(# layers and structural quality)
2.
1. • Investigate the 3D to 2D crossover in graphite.• Probe electronic and vibrational properties of few-layer, double-layer and single-layer graphene with double resonant Raman scattering.
Introduction: Vibrational Properties
ab-initio calculations:G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, and J. Hafner, Europhys. Lett. 32, 729 (1995)Review article: L. Wirtz and A. Rubio, Solid State Comm. 131, 141 (2004).
Introduction: Vibrational Properties
ab-initio calculations:G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, and J. Hafner, Europhys. Lett. 32, 729 (1995)Review article: L. Wirtz and A. Rubio, Solid State Comm. 131, 141 (2004).
2 atoms per unit cell => 6 phonon branches, 3 optic, 3 acoustic
Introduction: Vibrational Properties
Review article: L. Wirtz and A. Rubio, Solid State Comm. 131, 141 (2004).
Kinks in the dispersion (Kohn Anomaly)M. Lazzeri, F. Mauri, PRL 2004
Introduction: Vibrational Properties
Review article: L. Wirtz and A. Rubio, Solid State Comm. 131, 141 (2004).
Linear crossings of bands (due to symmetry)
Attention: different force constant parametrizations on the market
Review article: L. Wirtz and A. Rubio, Solid State Comm. 131, 141 (2004).
Finally: measured phonon dispersion brings good agreement with ab-initio calculations
Inelastic X-ray diffraction measurements:J. Maultzsch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 075501 (2004)
Experiment
ab-initio
Raman spectroscopy on graphite
kKphonon
at point, k~0→ G
Single-resonant
Ref.: S. Reich, C. Thomsen, J. Maultzsch, Carbon Nanotubes, Wiley-VCH (2004)
0 1500 3000Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u) graphite 2.33 eV
D
G
D‘ G‘
E2g mode at
Raman spectroscopy on graphite
kK
phonon
at point, k~0→ G
Single-resonant
Ref.: S. Reich, C. Thomsen, J. Maultzsch, Carbon Nanotubes, Wiley-VCH (2004)
G-line is nondispersive
0 1500 3000Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u) graphite 2.33 eV
D
G
D‘ G‘
E2g mode at
Raman spectroscopy on graphite
kKphonon
at point, k~0→ G
Single-resonant
Ref.: S. Reich, C. Thomsen, J. Maultzsch, Carbon Nanotubes, Wiley-VCH (2004)
E =
2.3
3 e
V
0.4 0 0.20.400.2-2
-1
0
1
2
E (
eV
)
KK MM M
q’
q
q’’A
B C
double-resonant
0 1500 3000Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u) graphite 2.33 eV
D
G
D‘ G‘
TO mode between K and M
Raman spectroscopy on graphite
kKphonon
at point, k~0→ G
Single-resonant
Ref.: S. Reich, C. Thomsen, J. Maultzsch, Carbon Nanotubes, Wiley-VCH (2004)
E =
2.3
3 e
V
0.4 0 0.20.400.2-2
-1
0
1
2
E (
eV
)
KK MM M
q’
q
q’’A
B C
double-resonant
0 1500 3000Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u) graphite 2.33 eV
D
G
D‘ G‘
TO mode between K and M
dispersive
Raman spectra of single- and double layer graphene
Sample fabrication:- Si wafer with 300 nm Si02 cap layer- Mechanical exfoliation of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG)Ref.: K.S. Novoselov et al., PNAS 102, 10451 (2005)
Scanning force microscope
1 m1
12
SiO2
Inte
nsity
(a.
u)
1200 1600 2000 2400 2800Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u)
Raman spectra of single- and double layer graphene
1
2
Scanning force microscope
1 m
D
single-layer graphene
double-layer graphene2
1
G D‘
Scanning confocal Raman spectroscopy:- Laser excitation of 532 nm/ 2.33 eV- Spot size:
Raman spectra of single- and double layer graphene
1
2
Scanning force microscope
1 mIn
tens
ity (
a.u)
1200 1600 2000 2400 2800Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u)
D
single-layer graphene
double-layer graphene2
1
G D‘
1500 1600 1700Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
)
Raman mapping: Integrated G line intensity
1
2
Scanning force microscope
1 m
Raman: G line intensity
1
2
Raman mapping: Integrated G line intensity
Scanning force microscope
1 m1
12
SiO2
Raman: Integrated G line intensity
1 m
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2Lateral position (m)
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)2-layer 1-layer SiO2
One-to-one correlation
1 1
2
65(?)
6
42 m
SFM
0
Intensity G
0 2 4 6 8 10Lateral position (m)
1
2
3
4
5
Inte
nsity
G (
a.u.
)
-2
-1
0
1
SF
M h
eig
ht (
nm
) 5(?) 6 462101
# layers
Raman spectra of single- and double layer graphene
1
2
Scanning force microscope
1 mIn
tens
ity (
a.u)
1200 1600 2000 2400 2800Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u)
D
single-layer graphene
double-layer graphene2
1
G D‘
Raman mapping: Integrated D line intensity
Symmetry:breaking / defects:
1. Edge of the flake.2. Boundary of sections of different height.3. But no defects within the flake.
kKphonon
close to K, M point, k>0Momentum restoring:elastic scattering → D
Double-resonant • Crystallite grain size, symmetry breaking [Tuinstra and Koenig, 1970]
2) Defects, disorder in general[Y. Wang et al, 1990]
Scanning force microscope
1 m1
12
SiO2
Raman: Integrated D line intensity
1 m
Raman spectra of single- and double layer graphene
1
2
Scanning force microscope
1 mIn
tens
ity (
a.u)
1200 1600 2000 2400 2800Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u)
D
single-layer graphene
double-layer graphene2
1
G D‘
Raman mapping: FWHM of the D‘ line
2600 2700 2800Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u)
~ 30 cm-1
~ 60 cm-1
1
2
Scanning force microscope
1 m
Raman: D‘ line intensity
1
2
1
2
Raman mapping: FWHM of the D‘ line
Scanning force microscope
1 m1
12
SiO2
Raman: FWHM of D‘ line
1 m
Splitting of the D‘ peak for double-layer graphene
Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
2600 2700 2800
q
D‘: Single-layer graphene
E =
2.3
3 e
V
0.4 0 0.20.400.2-2
-1
0
1
2
E (
eV
)
KK MM M
q’
q
q’’A
B C
Raman shift (cm-1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
2600 2700 2800
Splitting of the D‘ peak for double-layer graphene
Raman shift (cm -1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
2600 2700 2800
q
q1 q2
Related work: A.C. Ferrari at al., PRL (2006)
D‘: Single-layer graphene
D‘: Double-layer graphene
E =
2.3
3 e
V
0.4 0 0.20.400.2-2
-1
0
1
2
E (
eV
)
KK MM M
q’
q
q’’A
B C
-2
-1
0
1
2
E (
eV
)
KK MM M
q2q1 q3
qq0
q3
However: quantitative failure of the model
Raman shift (cm -1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
2600 2700 2800
q1 q2
D‘: Double-layer graphene
-2
-1
0
1
2
E (
eV
)
KK MM M
q2q1 q3
qq0
q3
The amount of splitting is underestimated by a factor of 2
However: quantitative failure of the model
Raman shift (cm -1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
2600 2700 2800
q1 q2
D‘: Double-layer graphene
-2
-1
0
1
2
E (
eV
)
KK MM M
q2q1 q3
qq0
q3
The amount of splitting is underestimated by a factor of 2
Furthermore: D-Line dispersion off by a factor of 2
However: quantitative failure of the model
Raman shift (cm -1)
Inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
2600 2700 2800
q1 q2
D‘: Double-layer graphene
-2
-1
0
1
2
E (
eV
)
KK MM M
q2q1 q3
qq0
q3
The amount of splitting is underestimated by a factor of 2
Furthermore: D-Line dispersion off by a factor of 2
Origin of the discrepancy: slope of ab-initio bands wrong,
or phonon dispersion wrong, or quantitative failure of double
resonant model
Pi-band dispersion of graphite
H
A. Grüneis, C. Attaccalite et al., submitted (2007), see cond-mat
Comparison of calculated and measured band-structure:
ARPES measurements
Blue lines: GW-calculations,
Red lines: LDA
Slope of the TO mode between K and M
J. Maultzsch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 075501 (2004)
Experiment
ab-initio
Conclusions• Raman spectroscopy: an alternative to scanning force microscopy
• Monolayer sensitivity (single to double layer)
• Defects/symmetry breaking at the edge not within the flakes
• Need for more quantitative investigations of the double-resonant Raman model (splitting of the D' line and dispersion of the D and D' lines
Raman: FWHM D‘
Raman: Intensity D
D. Graf, F. Molitor, K. Ensslin, C. Stampfer, A. Jungen, C. Hierold, and L.Wirtz,cond-mat/0607562 Nano Lett. 7, 238 (2007).Related work: A.C. Ferrari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2006).Gupta et al. Nano Lett. (2006).
Raman mapping: Integrated D line intensity
Symmetry:breaking / defects:
1. Edge of the flake.2. Boundary of sections of different height.3. But no defects within the flake.
• Crystallite grain size, symmetry breaking [Tuinstra and Koenig, 1970]
2) Defects, disorder in general[Y. Wang et al, 1990]
Scanning force microscope
1 m1
12
SiO2
Raman: Integrated D line intensity
1 m
E =
2.3
3 e
V
0.4 0 0.20.400.2-2
-1
0
1
2
E (
eV
)
KK MM M
q’
q
q’’A
B C
Conclusions Experiment:Davy Graf, Françoise Molitor, and Klaus Ensslin Solid State Physics, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
Christoph Stampfer, Alain Jungen, and Christofer Hierold Micro and Nanosystems, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
Theory: Ludger WirtzInstitute for Electronics, Microelectronics, and Nanotechnology (IEMN), 59652 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
D. Graf et al., condmat/ , submittedRelated work: A.C. Ferrari at al., condmat/0606284, A. Gupta et al., condmat/0606593
Raman: FWHM D‘
Raman: Intensity D
• Raman spectroscopy: an alternative to scanning force microscopy
• Monolayer sensitivity (single to double layer)
• Defects/symmetry breaking at the edge not within the flakes
Frequency shift of the G band
1 2 3 4 6 HOPG# layer
G p
eak
(cm
-1)
1581
1583
1585
Inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
Raman shift (cm-1)
G
1540 1560 1580 1600 1620
HOPG reference:1582 cm-1
HOPG2-layer1-layer
cm-1
One-to-one correlation
- Height sensitivity for few-layer graphene
- Proportional to # of layers, but saturation above ~ 6 ML
1 2 3 4 60.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
HOPG# layer
Rel
. in
tens
ity
G/D
'
0 2 4 6 8 10Lateral position (m)
1
2
3
4
5
Inte
nsity
G (
a.u.
)
-2
-1
0
1
SF
M h
eig
ht (
nm
) 5(?) 6 462101