experience from norwegian pilot projects
DESCRIPTION
Mutual Quality Enhancement and Innovation in University and Companies - through Integration of Research and Continuing Education. Experience from Norwegian pilot projects Toril Eikaas Eide, Centre for Continuing Education, UiB, Norway. Pilot projects co-operated by two Norwegian universities:. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Mutual Quality Enhancement and Innovation in University and Companies -
through Integration of Research and Continuing Education.
Experience from Norwegian pilot projects
Toril Eikaas Eide, Centre for Continuing Education, UiB, Norway
2
Pilot projects co-operated by two Norwegian universities:
• The Norwegian University for Life Sciences (UMB)• The University of Bergen (UiB)
Managed by their respective
’Centre for Continuing Education’,(SEVU),
here represented by:
Toril Eikaas Eide, Adviser, SEVU, UiB.
3
Project background – motivation – challenges:
• Companies: Limited scale of LLL and University Continuing Education (UCE) activity
• University and company: Little experience from applying recent research results directly/quickly in professional development in companies
• University: Limited knowledge about real life and important challenges in companies, -
and about their need for competence development
4
Background – motivation – challenges (cont.):
• UiB: Too little direct feedback from companies about their problems and demands for knowledge
• UMB: Not sufficiently following up / implementing results of research when collaborating with companies (criticism in customers’ survey)
• Collaboration fragmented - between university and companies
– not integrated or functioning as a whole
5
Overall project quality aim:
To stimulate increased innovation – through a more wholistic and long-term
collaboration in research and professional development
between university and companies
(economic life / working life)
6
Project aim (cont.):
Stimulate learning and competence development through• collaboration • exchange of experience • mutual knowledge construction
innovation = quality improvement in:
• Company • Network of companies,• University, • Region
7
’Innovation’ / quality enhancement seen as:
• New products• New / changed processes, working methods• Models/methods of organising work and
working place – in company / university• Pedagogical development
8
Core project feature:
• Running continuing education activities / professional development – in networks of regional companies– combined with and/or integrated in
research or R&D projects
* Supported by The Research Council of Norway
9
Four pilot projects – two each:
• Roses and cucumber (UMB)
• Cod health in fry and brood fish production (UiB)
• Operational meteorology (UiB)
– wawe theory and wave forecasting– extreme events (forecasting of wind/precipitation)
• Competence development in social and cultural entrepreneurship in Aurland (UMB)
10
Four pilot projects - two each
• Roses and Cucumber• Cod health in production of • Extreme weather (Oceanography
12
Pilot project aims: • Establish arenas for wholistic and long-range R&D
collaboration between companies and university• Mutual competence development between companies
and university through– Dialogue – Mutual exchange of practical and theoretical
knowledge and experience– Joint planning, development, running and evaluation
of• Concrete learning activities/courses • Research projects
13
NO
RW
EG
IAN
UN
IVER
SIT
Y O
F LIF
E S
CIE
NC
ES
www.umb.no
Researchinstitute
Company
COMMON LEARNING PLACE
KNOWLEDGE
Theory-based
Experience-based
Increasedcompetence
Increasedcompetence
innovation
Practice + new problems
Theory + new research problems
Research results
Our model for mutual and double loop learning
14
SEVU’s role:
• Project leader
• Process leader and facilitator
• Pedagogical coach and adviser
• Evaluator
15
Practical approach: Integrating professional development activity in R&D collaboration:
• At the beginning of the project:
strengthen the users’ competence basis to participate actively in the project
• In the course of the project:
establish meeting places for systematic and mutual learning and exchange of experience
• Towards the end of the project:
tailor learning activities for groups of employees to support practical implementation of new knowledge
16
Pedagogical approach:
• Learner based• Problem based – work place / company• Experience based• Theory based
17
NO
RW
EG
IAN
UN
IVER
SIT
Y O
F LIF
E S
CIE
NC
ES
www.umb.no
MODEL FOR COLLABORATIVE CONSTRUCTION OF KNOWLEDGE IN R&D PROJECTS
Dialogue between researchers and collaborators (ie company managers and supervisors) representing Theory-based and Experience-based knowledge
EXPERIMENTS-In production halls
-In laboratories
INTERPRETATIONANALYSIS
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
PLANNINGNew experiments?
New research problems?
New action in the company?
PRELIMINARYRESULTS
18
Results and outcome - quality enhancement:
More traditional outcome:• Courses• Learning materials• Meetings
Company representatives report:• Increased knowledge • More focus on and real change of working practices• Improved and more frequent contact and dialogue with
university• Easier to contact university• Increased interest in research initiatives and results
19
Results and outcome - quality enhancement (cont.):
University representatives / faculty report (cont.):
• Easier to contact companies• Increased knowledge about working practices and
challenges in companies• Improved and more frequent contact and dialogue with
companies• New experience with applying problem based learning
(PBL) in work place / companies• Feasible with immediate integration of research results
in courses• - and also quickly let practical experience in companies
influence research
20
Results and outcome - quality enhancement (cont.):
University representatives / faculty report (cont.):
• Permanent areas for dialogue with companies• Better access to more and interesting research materials• Input from companies about possible / necessary
research fields• Establishing (and funding) more research projects
21
Results and outcome - quality enhancement (cont.):
Centre for continuing education (SEVU):
• Improved and more frequent contact between SEVU and research groups
- which stimulates and facilitates more courses and professional development initiatives
• New experience with applying problem based learning (PBL) in work place / companies
• Experience with and learning from trying out
new roles and tasks
22
Results and outcome - quality enhancement (cont.):
Centre for continuing education (SEVU):
• Improved competency in managing and facilitating learning processes - and coaching faculty
• Promotion of SEVUs competency, functions and tasks to new users:
• Companies (external)• Faculty and departments at the university (internal)
Particularly positive feedback about the usefulness
of the function/role as process leaders!