executive summary - web viewit is a pizza restaurant located at . 167 marshall street, syracuse, ny...
TRANSCRIPT
Kyu Sik “Scott” Jung 420 Lambreth LaneSyracuse, NY 13210
December 8, 2016
Mr. Jamie CyrBusiness Operations, Director of Auxiliary Services204 Steele HallSyracuse UniversitySyracuse, NY 13210
Dear Mr. Cyr,
On behalf of my entire team, we are pleased to send you our final draft of our off-campus SUpercard usage feasibility report. Included in the report you will find our outside research and our recommendation based on our findings.
At this time, we believe the best solution is to promote Tapingo’s on-campus deliveries, which will allow use their SUpercard accounts when ordering off-campus food. Considering Tapingo’s profits are from delivery fees and would not interfere or add charges to the university. This would be a happy medium for both students and the university.
We want to thank you again for all of your help providing us with information and connecting us to different people and resources for our report. Please let me know if my team can be of any more assistance and answer any questions you might have.
Sincerely,
Kyu “Scott” sik JungSung “Steve” Hoon YoonAlexandra LockeyPrince Sledge
1
Extending the Syracuse University SUpercard
Off-Campus Feasibility Report
Prepared by Kyu “Scott” sik Jung, Alexandra Lockey,
Prince Sledge, and Sung “Steve” Hoon Yoon
Prepared for Jamie Cyr, Syracuse University Director of Auxiliary Services
Syracuse University
December 8, 2016
2
Extending the Syracuse University SUpercard Off-Campus Feasibility Report
Table of ContentsExecutive Summary.................................................................................................................4
Introduction..............................................................................................................................7
Research Methods...................................................................................................................8
Interviews...........................................................................................................................8
Credible Online Sources....................................................................................................8
Overview of Alternatives..........................................................................................................9
Tapingo..............................................................................................................................9
CBORD UGryd................................................................................................................10
Third Party Vendor Outsourcing......................................................................................10
Criteria....................................................................................................................................11
Taxation and Not-for-Profit Status...................................................................................11
Cost Evaluation......................................................................................................................12
Tapingo Cost Analysis.....................................................................................................12
CBORD UGryd UGryd Cost Analysis..............................................................................12
Conclusions............................................................................................................................12
Recommendation...................................................................................................................13
Appendix A: Glossary.............................................................................................................14
Appendix B: Stakeholder Analysis.........................................................................................16
Appendix C: Daily Orange Research.....................................................................................17
Appendix D: Online Credible Sources....................................................................................18
Appendix E: Interview Notes from Jamie Cyr.........................................................................20
Appendix F: Interview Notes with William Carty.....................................................................22
Appendix G: Interview Notes with Acropolis Pizza House.....................................................23
Appendix H: Interview Notes with Benjamin Anderson..........................................................24
Appendix I: Works Cited.........................................................................................................25
Appendix J: Bibliography........................................................................................................25
3
Executive SummaryMany universities across the United States offer students an on-campus meal plan
and an off-campus meal plan program or an off-campus advantage program in the
surrounding community. While Syracuse University offers students many additional dining
options besides the dining halls, there is no off-campus meal plan or opportunities besides
on-campus cafes. Unfortunately, the on-campus cafes typically serve the same options
within a limited rotation of choices leaving students wanting to explore more options off-
campus despite expensive meal plan prices.
Syracuse students pay for their on-campus meals with a debit card like system
through their ID card. Not only does the ID card have a student’s meal plan on it, but it
allows them to pay for additional food options at the various student centers and on-campus
cafes through an associated account called their SUpercard account. Students or parents
and guardians can add money to the SUpercard account through an online student portal.
Currently, the SUpercard can only be used for on-campus purchases. However, intertwined
between academic buildings and the rest of campus and within walking distance lies
Marshall Street, the primary campus commercial area with relatively inexpensive dining
options and key services for students.
Marshall Street’s location and its various restaurants make it a prime connection to
the greater Syracuse community, and offers a chance for students to have additional options
they desire for affordable prices. Syracuse University can easily diversify and expand dining
options and locations that accept payments through students’ SUpercards on Marshall
Street like other successful off-campus meal plan extensions at universities like The New
School and University of Buffalo. If Syracuse University were to implement this system, it
would also serve as an incentive for the student body to use and add funds to their
SUpercard accounts, as well as further connect students with the greater Syracuse
community.
4
Some key stakeholders that can affect the implementation of this project include
Tapingo, a food delivery mobile application that has recently been brought to Syracuse
University on-campus cafes and student centers, and the Syracuse University Auxiliary
Services. Tapingo could contribute to an off-campus meal plan extension by providing
further payment options for off-campus sites. The Syracuse Department of Auxiliary Services
is another key stakeholder. They are in charge of both food services and meal plan and ID
card services. We believe they could advocate for the project to the university. Lastly, the
restaurants on Marshall Street serve as important group of stakeholders that must be willing
to work with us and be involved in order to extend SUpercard payments to their
establishments.
Two main alternatives of feasibility arose when researching options to extend
Syracuse’s meal plan. These are Tapingo and CBORD UGryd. Tapingo is run by a private
agency. The agency sets up transaction systems with universities across the nation so
students can use their campus cards to order food that is then delivered or picked up.
Recently, Syracuse University allowed students to use their SUpercard through Tapingo
application to order delivery food from on-campus dining options. However Syracuse
University requires students to use their credit card instead of SUpercard when using
Tapingo to order off-campus food. Despite the fact other universities allow campus card
payments for off-campus meals through Tapingo, Syracuse University does not allow
students this option.
A second alternative that could be implemented to further student dining options is
use of CBORD UGryd. CBORD UGryd is a private entity that coordinates universities and
hospitals food services, housing, and security. Majority of smaller universities across the
nation use CBORD UGryd to operate their housing and food services. The agency services
allow students to use campus cards off-campus.
While our team looked into other options, such as third party outsourcing, none of
them were feasible because Syracuse University is highly protective of student information
5
and is unwilling to work with third party vendors for services they are already providing.
Furthermore, third party outsourcing would create additional costs for equipment; a third
party’s system would not operate with the existing transaction handling system.
Syracuse University Food Services is a non-profit department, meaning all
transactions through the campus card are non-taxable. This means if they extend off-
campus, they become for-profit department and have to pay sales and income tax which will
raise the cost of the student meal plan. Tapingo was able to work with Syracuse University
by having a separate account for off-campus services. Therefore, the university does not
allow students to use their SUpercard account as a credit card for off-campus purchases and
there is no additional equipment cost associated because Tapingo will provide tablet that
handles order handling transactions. If Syracuse implements CBORD UGryd, it will still
experience the same taxation issue with Tapingo but it would cost more money because
UGryd does not provide equipment for free. Therefore, Syracuse University and off-campus
restaurants would have to pay for equipment installation.
After conducting research, face-to-face communication with various involved parties,
and many different phone interviews, the consensus became clear that CBORD UGryd
would not be possible. A similar feasibility was proposed in 2011 and was turned down due
to the large transaction costs that would be necessary to implement in order to maintain both
legal and economic regulations. Based on these findings, online research, and interviews
with sources such as the New School, we found out that other Universities were able to
implement a similar policy with the specific goal of increasing student satisfaction, not merely
to make a profit.
Syracuse University should work with Tapingo student representatives to further
promote Tapingo’s on-campus deliveries. Too many students still do not know about or
understand the extent of Tapingo services and how they can expand their dining options on-
campus. Considering Tapingo profits are from delivery fees, they would not interfere or add
charges to the university and many other universities allow their students to pay through
6
their campus card accounts when ordering off-campus food or services. We were also able
to find out that other universities were able to remain their non-profit status while Tapingo as
a method to extend their campus money to off-campus because all the transactions through
Tapingo were qualified for Unrelated Business Income Tax.
IntroductionThe Syracuse University SUpercard is a declining debit card-like system in which money can
be added to students’ accounts to purchase food or pay for specific academic services.
Currently, the SUpercard can only be used to make meal transactions at on-campus cafes or
in the dining halls. The issue with this limitation on SUpercard, is that over the course of an
entire semester these options become repetitive due to their small rotation of options.
Syracuse University students already pay large sums of money for their meal plans, which
are required freshmen year. Considering Syracuse University meal plans come with an
allotted amount of SUpercard funds, students should be able to have more dining options at
their exposure for the price they are paying.
Our primary goal of is to diversify the eating locations that accepted with the SUpercard by
adding restaurants located on Marshall Street to the list of accepted SUpercard locations.
Similar off-campus meal plan systems have been implemented at other universities such as
the New School, New York University, and University of Buffalo. Our firm belief is that if
Syracuse University were to implement an off-campus program, it would significantly
increase student satisfaction and make SUpercard a more attractive option for students and
faculty.
7
Research MethodsOur team gathered information to help aid our recommendation through various emails, in-
person, and over the phone interviews as well as online research using Syracuse University
and other universities’ meal plan and ID services websites.
InterviewsOur team conducted several interviews with various stakeholders and knowledgeable people
within different university’s meal plan and ID services departments. At Syracuse University
we interviewed Jamie Cyr, the Director of the Auxiliary Services, to find out food service’s
stance on this project. According to Mr. Cyr, a similar feasibility was proposed in 2011 and
was turned down due in large part to the transaction costs that would result
(Personal communication, October 2016). Based on another interview conducted with the
New School, we found out that other universities were able to implement a similar policy with
the specific goal of increasing student satisfaction, not merely to make a profit through their
off-campus advantage programs (W. Carty, personal communication, November 2016). We
then interviewed Benjamin Anderson from Tapingo, to find out how Tapingo operates (B.
Anderson, personal communication, November 2016). For more information, please see
Appendix C through F.
Credible Online SourcesWe have also consulted numerous credible sources online to search how other universities
have successfully implemented an off-campus meal plan programs. For more information,
please see Appendix D.
Overview of AlternativesAfter our initial research, we found two alternatives that Syracuse University can use to
8
extend SUpercard usage off-campus: Tapingo and CBORD UGryd.
Tapingo Tapingo is a mobile and website application service run by a private agency that sets up
transaction systems across the nation that allows students to use their university’s campus
ID cards to order food online for delivery or pickup service. Tapingo serves many colleges
and universities across the U.S., including New York University, the University of Arizona,
and the University of Miami. Tapingo is also affiliated with the National Association of
College and University Food Services (NACUFS) so they possess a great stock of
knowledge how Food Services operate (“Partners”, 2016). Recently, Syracuse University
brought Tapingo to campus but only included some of the potential features. Currently,
students are only allowed to use their SUpercard for pickup or delivery for on-campus
student centers, cafes and dining halls.
We found that Tapingo only profits from delivery fees, which means it does not interfere with
or charge the university for any transactions (B. Anderson, personal communication,
November 2016). However, Tapingo does not fully meet expectations for this report because
Syracuse University does not allow the students to use their SUpercard accounts through
Tapingo when ordering off-campus services. Instead students need to use their credit card
instead of SUpercard when ordering off-campus food. After interviewing Benjamin Anderson,
who is the Director of Public Communications at Tapingo, we found that this decision was
specific to Syracuse because other universities use Tapingo allows to use campus card
account when ordering off-campus services (B. Anderson, personal communication,
November 2016).
CBORD UGryd CBORD is a private entity that provides cashless card systems, management software and
process management software. CBORD serves colleges and universities, healthcare
9
facilities, supermarkets, and many other facilities all over the world. Syracuse University
uses CBOD service to handle transactions that occur in campus dinning centers and
university cafes. CBORD UGryd is a service provided CBORD that can handle off-campus
transactions (“About CBORD”, 2016). Unlike Tapingo, CBORD UGryd would have a much
stronger involvement with the university’s transactions system. A lot of smaller schools
across the nation use CBORD UGryd to operate their housing and food services and allow
their campus card to be used off campus (J. Cyr, personal communication, October 2016). In
fact, Syracuse University already uses CBORD transaction equipment and systems so it
would be an easy transition.
Third Party Vendor OutsourcingFrom interviews with William Carty, the Director of the New School’s Card Services, we
found out New School had to work with a third party to implement an off-campus merchant
program because their existing system did not support off-campus transactions (W. Carty,
personal communication, November 2016). By using the New School’s implementation as a
model, it is completely feasible for Syracuse University to use a third party to extend the
usage of SUper Card. However, we found out from Jamie Cyr that Syracuse University is
highly protective of working with third party vendors because Syracuse University does not
want to share student information (J. Cyr, personal communication, October 2016).
Unfortunately, using third party vendors would also create additional costs, such as
installation cost, for Syracuse University and any involved restaurants. There is also the risk
that a third party’s system would be interoperable with Syracuse University's existing
transaction handling systems.
10
CriteriaOverall cost is the most important aspect for the university when making their decision
whether or not to implement an off-campus meal plan or extend the SUpercard off-campus.
Based on how much the university stressed cost as a deciding factor (J. Cyr, personal
communication, October 2016), we focused on three main cost criteria when evaluating all
our options and our final two options. The criteria we used to evaluate our alternatives are
Taxation, Equipment cost, and installation cost. For each option, we looked extensively on
how they would impact the university’s taxation and if there would be any equipment or
installation costs.
Taxation and Not-for-Profit StatusSyracuse University Food Services Department does not pay an income or sales tax
because they have non-profit status. This means all transactions through the campus card
are non-taxable. However, if Food Services extends meal plan service off-campus, they
become for-profit department and have to pay sales and income tax which will raise the cost
of the student meal plan.
According to Jamie Cyr, Director of Auxiliary Services, the sales and income tax will have to
be paid by the students (J. Cyr, personal communication, October 2016). This would
increase the price of meal plans by 10-15% (J. Cyr, personal communication, October 2016),
which needs to be approved by the parents since majority of tuition is paid by them.
However, Tapingo was able to work with Syracuse University to have a separate account for
off-campus services. Therefore, the university does not allow students to use their
SUpercard account as credit card for off-campus purchases.
11
Cost Evaluation
Tapingo Cost AnalysisSyracuse University and any participating restaurants would not have to pay for equipment
and installation cost for Tapingo. Tapingo uses a tablet to handle their transactions and this
tablet is provided by Tapingo for free (J. Cyr, personal communication, October 2016).
CBORD UGryd UGryd Cost AnalysisWhile the university would still encounter the same taxation issue they have with Tapingo,
unlike Tapingo, CBORD UGryd UGryd does not provide free equipment and installations.
CBORD UGryd would cost more money because the university and participating restaurants
would need to individually pay for the additional equipment and the associated installation
fee.
Conclusions Our initial goal was to extend the use of SUpercard to include off-campus food locations on
Marshall Street, however after conducting all of our interviews and online research we came
to the consensus that this was not feasible. Upon realizing this, we turned to our cost
analysis to see whether or not either Tapingo or CBORD UGryd could increase student
satisfaction by expanding current dining options and creating partnerships and relationships
with local businesses. Based on these requirements, it is more feasible for Syracuse
University and surrounding restaurants to use Tapingo over CBORD UGryd because
Tapingo does not involve any cost associated with equipment or installation and the
university has the option to integrate the SUpercard to pay for off-campus meal transactions
later on.
12
RecommendationMoving forward, Syracuse University should work with student representatives to further
promote Tapingo on-campus deliveries. Tapingo, being a new service in Syracuse University
we propose the university should promote the application to the students since it is not as
widely known yet. Considering Tapingo profits are from delivery fees, they would not
interfere or add charges to the university. We also received an information form Tapingo that
there were universities who were able to remain non-profit status while allowing their
campus money to be used off-campus through Tapingo. Tapingo informed us that these
universities could remain non-profit because all the transactions through Tapingo qualified
for Unrelated Business Income Tax. We do realize that each universities’ food services
operate differently but we believe if Syracuse University directly contact with Tapingo and
shows interest in off-campus merchant program, they will have numerous data and methods
to implement off-campus merchant program through Tapingo since there are universities
who had success with this project.
In addition, it is important to realize that all the universities who were successful at
implementing off-campus merchant program were motivated to pursue the project to
enhance their service and increase student satisfaction. We do realize Syracuse University
must generate enough revenue to self-sustain their Food Services department but we
believe if the university pursues Tapingo extension to enhance their service and to satisfy
students, they can expect enough, or perhaps more, revenue to self-sustain their
department.
13
Appendix A: Glossary Acropolis: It is a pizza restaurant located at 167 Marshall Street, Syracuse, NY 13210.
CBORD UGryd: World’s leading provider of campus and cashless card systems, food and
nutrition service management software, integrated security solutions, nationwide student
discount and commerce programs. It was founded in 1975.
Marshall Street: It is a street adjacent to University of Syracuse in New York. The street
primarily functions as an off-campus commercial are for Syracuse University students.
NACUFS: It stands for National Association of College & University Food Services.
NACUFS was founded in 1958 by a group of 20 college and university food services. Its
headquartered in Okemos, Michigan and for the past 60 years, it has supported college and
universities across the US by providing the highest quality of food service to campuses.
SU Auxiliary Services Department: It is divisions within Business, Finance and
Administrative service in Syracuse University led by Jamie P. Cyr. The department includes
Drumlins Country Club, , SU bookstore and etc. The main objective of the department is to
provide good products, facilities and customer service to the Syracuse University
community.
SUpercard: Is is a declining balance account that is designed to supplement Syracuse
University’s meal program. This account allows Syracuse university students to buy food on
daily basis in food courts and cafeterias inside the campus. SUpercard comes with a meal
plan.
Tapingo: Technological company started in 2011 that uses mobile, location technologies
and sensors to benefit merchants and people when ordering food quickly. Today, Tapingo
14
primarily work with college campuses.
15
Appendix B: Stakeholder AnalysisThis chart contains some of the key stakeholders that are either affected by or have a
significant effect on the outcome of our project.
Stakeholder Name
Contact Person
Impact on
Project
Influence over
Project
Importance to
Stakeholder
How could stakeholders contribute to the project?
Strategy for Engaging
Stakeholders
TapingoBenjamin Anderson
High HighBeing able to generate profit
Extend to off campus restaurant payments to include SUpercard
- Phone calls
- Emails
- Interviews
Syracuse UniversityAuxiliary Services
Jamie CyrMedium High
Enhance service, increase student
satisfaction, and expect more usage
of SUper card money
Answering any questions regarding the cost feasibility of our project
- Phone calls
- Emails
- Interviews
Acropolis Pizza House
(Example Marshall
Street Restaurant)
Steve Papazides, Manager
Low Low
Being able to generate profit for their business
Being in favour of extending Tapingo payment option
-Interviews
Appendix C: Daily Orange Research In order to learn more about Syracuse University’s past meal plan changes, we researched
part articles from the Daily Orange, the independent campus newspaper of Syracuse, NY. In
2002 Marshall Street business owners said they would welcome meal plans run
16
independently of the university and the Student Association’s president-elect Andrew
Thomson said he will look into the possibility in 2003.
Prior attempts to use SUpercards off campus had met legal roadblocks so the university
attempted to have the account on the SUID card. But the plan still couldn’t pass because off-
campus restaurants are considered “unrelated businesses” and cannot be included in
campus meal plans due to legal and taxing purposes.
At that time the university didn’t view an independently owned off-campus meal plan as
significant competition. Instead of offering off-grounds meal plans, the university expanded
to do more delivery after hours to better serve students.
In 2005, the Off Campus Meal Plan (OCMP), an independent meal plan, started to gain
publicity and started in the 2005-2006 academic year at Syracuse University. It cost between
$6 and $7 a meal, about half the price of those on the university’s 10-meal plan at the time.
Each participating restaurant decided how much a ‘meal’ was worth. To participate in the
program, students used a credit card to purchase a 2, 5, 7, 10, 14 or 19-meal weekly plan
and any unused meals will carry over into the next semester. While successful at other
college campuses the OCMP never grew as large in Syracuse like predicted by previous
reports.
Appendix D: Online Credible Sources Many other universities around the country have flexible meal plans and accounts for on and
off-campus transactions. Here are the following programs researched to help establish the
Syracuse University feasibility report for an off-campus SUpercard extension program.
17
Columbia University in New York, New York has their flex account which is a dollar-for-dollar
declining balance account accessed through Columbia University ID card that also works for
thirty-four off-campus locations which includes grocery markets, restaurants, health and drug
stores, as well as school supplies and home furnishing stores.
State University of New York Onondaga Community College in Syracuse, NY has the
LAZERCARD, their pre-paid debit account option for making purchases on-campus as well
as at participating locations through their Off-Campus Advantage Program. The Off-Campus
Advantage Program allows OCC students to use their LAZERCARD at thirty-four
participating locations which include restaurants, pharmacies, and various supply stores.
The New School, also in New York, New York, has Newcard Cash connected to their meal
plan and student newcard ID accounts that allow them to pay with their newcards at more
than twenty off-campus participating restaurants and retailers, all New School cafeterias, the
New School Bookstore, and other venues.
University of Buffalo in Buffalo, NY has FlexiBULL Bucks, a prepaid debit account that is
accessible through the UB Card. The UB Card FlexiBULL Bucks allows students can make
food, supplies, and other gift purchases at numerous locations both on and off-campus
where they’ll receive a discount for their purchase. The FlexiBULL Bucks works for twenty-
one on-campus restaurants and stores as well as thirty-one off campus locations.
University of Denver in Denver, Colorado students have their Flex account, a debit account
associated with their Pioneer ID Card. Through their flex account students can make
discounted purchases on-campus or purchases at twenty-two off-campus locations.
18
Appendix E: Interview Notes from Jamie CyrJamie Cyr, Syracuse University Director of Auxiliary Services
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (315) 443-9662
Challenges:
1. SUpercard is part of SU meal plan, which is not charged with income tax. If it were to
be used off campus, SU might be charged with income tax.
2. SUpercard is part of SU meal plan, which does not charge sales tax of 8%. If it were
to be used in off campus, students have to pay for the sales tax -> Price of Meal plan
will increase - Need approval from the parents of the students.
3. Restaurants on Marshall Street were interested in this feasibility report (they wrote a
version in 2001) however, merchants decided not to do it because they have to pay
for the equipment and transaction fee of 5 to 10%. (Also complicated sharing account
with SU)
4. Other small schools let a 3rd party to handle transactions but SU does not want any
3rd party to handle transactions.
Recommendations:
1. Try to survey students and restaurants if they want meal plans even with the cost of
tax and transaction fees.
2. Check with banks to find out if it is feasible to make Syracuse University student card
to have a debit card function. Check with other schools that use their card as a debit
card to find out how they operate.
3. Check out the Site “NACUFS” (National College Food Services)
19
4. Conduct further research on Tapingo, which lets students to use SUpercard to deliver
off campus food. Jamie said, Tapingo does not touch SUpercard account.
Possible Solutions:
1. The biggest issue with TAX : Look into “unrelated income business tax (UBIT)” it
could be an escape route if sales in food services off campus can be filed under
UBIT.
Issues to Think of:
1. Maybe OCC or small schools let third party vendors to handle food transactions
offcampus (which the school decided to be profit food department rather than non
profit even they pay tax because they don’t have the resources (not enough cafes
and cafeterias) so they have to outsource.
Is this feasibility going to raise revenue for SU?
1. If it does not raise it, then it is only losing in transaction fees and taxes.
2. Most likely, revenue could decrease for SU because now students are using money
off campus.
Appendix F: Interview Notes with William CartyWilliam Carty, Director of New School Card Services
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (212) 229-5323 x3673
20
Phone Interview:
1. The New School had to work with a third party because their existing system could
not handle off-campus transactions.
2. The New school was able to encourage the participation of off-campus restaurants
by offering them an advertisement within campus
3. William Carty recommended to contact CBORD UGryd directly to ask about CBORD
UGryd UGyrd. CBORD UGryd UGyrd is a system offered by CBORD UGryd that
handles off-campus transactions.
4. Carty explained the main motivation for universities to implement an off-campus
merchant program is to enhance student satisfaction. He explained when universities
purse this project in an effort to generate profit, it will most likely fail.
Appendix G: Interview Notes with Acropolis Pizza House Steve Papazides, Manager, Acropolis
Phone: (315) 472- 4876
Address: 167 Marshall St, Syracuse, NY 13210
1. Through the walk-in interview, we were able to find out that Acropolis already uses
Tapingo already to let students to order on their mobile device.
21
2. We asked if the merchants are willing to pay 10% transaction cost if students were to
use campus food card at Acropolis. We were able to find out that Acropolis was
willing to pay the 10% fee for students using SUpercard because they are already
paying 10% discount to students who purchase their food through Tapingo .
One of the worries Acropolis had was that they would dislike the system if they had to carry
a separate equipment to handle SUpercard even if the equipment were given at no cost.
22
Appendix H: Interview Notes with Benjamin Anderson Benjamin Anderson, Director of Corporate Marketing, TapingoEmail: [email protected]
Phone: (215) 866- 6489
Question: Syracuse University informed us that they do not share any transaction information
with third parties. However, the university uses Tapingo so how does Tapingo establish
agreements with colleges to have access to student id accounts?
Answer: Colleges and universities do not share any data with us. We use separate account from
the universities. We work more with the merchants around the campus than the university itself.
Question: What is the profit structure for Tapingo? What is the revenue stream for Tapingo?
Answer: Our profit structure is based on delivery fees. We market our application to the students
by giving special discounts, which the deal is made between Tapingo and the merchants. We do
not charge merchants separately but ask for discounts from time to time in order to promote the
company and merchant. Our revenue stream differs from school to school.
Question: What are the reasons that Tappingo only lets its users to spend id funds at on-
campus establishments ?
Answer: Well, Tapingo doesn't make that decision. If the university allows us, we can make
students to use campus food card account to order off campus restaurants. The university
controls where student card funds can be used, not us.
Question: Are there universities partnered with Tapingo where students can purchase off
campus food through Tapingo from student account?
Answer: I cannot give you a specific number but I am aware that there are a lot of schools that allow their students to use their campus account through tapingo to order off campus food.
Question: Were the universities able to keep their non-profit status who allowed their campus money to be used off-campus?
Answer: I cannot give you the list of universities, but if I remember correctly yes, they could keep their non-profit status. I believe they were able to because all the transactions through us can qualify for the unrelated business income tax.
23
Appendix I: Works CitedAnderson, B. (2016, November). Email interview.
Carty, W. (2016, November). Phone interview.
CBORD. (n.d.). Retrieved December 08, 2016, from https://www.cbord.com/about/
Cyr, J. (2016, October). Phone interview.
Online & Mobile Food Delivery | Order Restaurant Takeout, Delivery, and Campus Food |
Tapingo.com. (n.d.). Retrieved December 08, 2016, from
http://www.tapingo.com/partners
Appendix J: BibliographyAbout Flex. Retrieved October 20, 2016, from http://dining.columbia.edu/about-flex
Accepted Flex Locations. Retrieved October 20, 2016, from
http://dining.columbia.edu/accepted-flex-locations
Anderson, B. (2016, November). Email interview.
Boren, M. (2008, December). Food Fight. Retrieved October 25, 2016, from
http://dailyorange.com/2005/08/off-campus-meal-plans-offered-to-students/
Brown, E. (2002, November). Off-Campus Meal Plans Successful in College Towns.
Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://dailyorange.com/2002/11/off-campus
-meal-plans-successful-in-college-towns/
Carty, W. (2016, November). Phone interview.
Cyr, J. (2016, October). Phone interview.
Duffett , C. (2005). Off-campus Meal Plan Links SU to Local Restaurants. Retrieved
November 1, 2016 from http://search.proquest.com/docview/219322257?
accountid=14214
FlexiBULL Bucks | MyUBCard.com. Retrieved October 15, 2016, from
24
https://myubcard.com/mealplans/flexibull-bucks
Gall, A. (2016, April 7). Tapingo fails to gain momentum at U. Retrieved November 2,
2016, from http://search.proquest.com.libezproxy2.syr.edu/docview/1779172519
? pq-origsite=summon
Howard, R. (2005, March). Off-Campus Meal Plan Offers New Card Swiping
Alternatives. Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://dailyorange.com/2005/03/off
-campus-meal-plan-offers-new-card-swiping-alternatives/
ID Cards - Onondaga Community College. Retrieved October 20, 2016, from
http://students.sunyocc.edu/index.aspx?id=42
Pepitone, J. (2005, August). Off-campus Meal Plans Offered to Students. Retrieved
October 25, 2016, from http://dailyorange.com/2005/08/off-campus-meal-plans
-offered-to-students/
Reis, L. (2015, August 3). Breakthrough Offering From Mobile-Commerce Pioneer
Tapingo Unlocks New Revenue Stream for Universities. Retrieved November 2,
2016, from http://search.proquest.com.libezproxy2.syr.edu/docview/1700659219/
fulltext/2979C8A917B14973PQ/1?accountid=14214
Tapingo Debuts at UAB, LSU and VSU. (2013, November 18). Retrieved November 1,
2016, from http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/article/GALE|A349383302?u=nysl
_ce_syr&sid=summon&userGroup=nysl_ce_syr
The New School newcard. Retrieved October 20, 2016 from
http://www.newschool.edu/card/newcard-cash/
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital -- First in Healthcare to Partner With CBORD UGryd
Off-Campus Commerce. (2010, May 5). Retrieved November 2, 2016, from
http://bi.galegroup.com/essentials/article/GALE|A225509965?u=nysl_ce_syr&sid
=summon&userGroup=nysl_ce_sy
25
Two Schools Join CBORD UGryd Off-campus Merchant Program. (2009, October 15).
Retrieved November 2, 2016, from http://infoweb.newsbank.com/resources/doc/
nb/news/12B6D9B3C9264518?p=AW
26
27