excel for grading with rubrics
TRANSCRIPT
P A U L L E S L I E
E D U C A T I O N F A C U L T Y
S H A R J A H W O M E N ’ S C O L L E G E
Excel for Grading with Rubrics
Rubric
A B CCategory / Score 9-10 8 7
Critical understanding
50%
Score:_____
Insightful and possible interpretations of the data and comparisons between the data.
Critical review and reflection of own interpretations provided.
Strong critical understanding of the research as a whole as well as key aspects
Possible interpretations of the data and comparisons between the data.
Provided some critical review and/or reflection of own interpretations of the data.
Reasonable critical understanding of the research as a whole with most key aspects provided.
Interpretations of the data and comparisons between the data may not indicate a sound understanding of research.
Shallow, misinterpreted or minimal critical review and/or reflection of own interpretations of the data.
Overly opinionated leading to misinterpretation of the data.
Structure and organization
30%
Score:_____
Information is presented through a variety of means and aligned to the highest qualities of an infographic.
The notes clearly supplement the infographic enabling the reader to obtain the complete picture.
Headings were appropriate and identified major aspects of the area related to the research or data trends.
Information is presented through several means but there are errors or does not reflect highest qualities of an infographic.
Some of the notes supplement the infographic but leaves the reader having to do more work to connect information from both sources.
Headings did not always capture the major aspects of research article.
Information is presented using limited variety and dependent on words and headings in the infographic.
The notes do not always supplement the infographic but leave the reader having to do far too much work to connect information from both sources.
Headings are not always appropriate.
References
10%
Excellent – all entries correctly used APA style;
References are apt.
Good – some minor errors in the entries using APA style; most references are apt.
Some errors in the entries using APA style; references are often not relevant or incomplete.
Language Usage
10%
Score: ______
All written text is free of errors
Shows appropriate vocabulary
All written text is free of errors
Shows strong attempts at appropriate vocabulary
All written text is mostly free of errors
Some inappropriate vocabulary
Rubric with grades
A B CCategory / Score 9-10 8 7
Critical understanding
50%
Score:___8__
Insightful and possible interpretations of the data and comparisons between the data.
Critical review and reflection of own interpretations provided.
Strong critical understanding of the research as a whole as well as key aspects
Possible interpretations of the data and comparisons between the data.
Provided some critical review and/or reflection of own interpretations of the data.
Reasonable critical understanding of the research as a whole with most key aspects provided.
Interpretations of the data and comparisons between the data may not indicate a sound understanding of research.
Shallow, misinterpreted or minimal critical review and/or reflection of own interpretations of the data.
Overly opinionated leading to misinterpretation of the data.
Structure and organization
30%
Score:___8.3__
Information is presented through a variety of means and aligned to the highest qualities of an infographic.
The notes clearly supplement the infographic enabling the reader to obtain the complete picture.
Headings were appropriate and identified major aspects of the area related to the research or data trends.
Information is presented through several means but there are errors or does not reflect highest qualities of an infographic.
Some of the notes supplement the infographic but leaves the reader having to do more work to connect information from both sources.
Headings did not always capture the major aspects of research article.
Information is presented using limited variety and dependent on words and headings in the infographic.
The notes do not always supplement the infographic but leave the reader having to do far too much work to connect information from both sources.
Headings are not always appropriate.
References
10% __8.5___
Excellent – all entries correctly used APA style;
References are apt.
Good – some minor errors in the entries using APA style;
most references are apt.
Some errors in the entries using APA style; references are often not relevant or incomplete.
Language Usage
10%
Score: ___8.3___
All written text is free of errors
Shows appropriate vocabulary
All written text is free of errors
Shows strong attempts at appropriate vocabulary
All written text is mostly free of errors
Some inappropriate vocabulary
Score in Excel
=(B3*0.5)+(C3*0.3)+(D3*0.1)+(E3*0.1)
The formula goes in F4 – then simply drag the formula down to all the cells.
1 A B C D E F
2 Student task structure lit lang
350% 30% 10% 10% 4003_data
4 1 8.5 8.5 8 8.5 8.5
5 2 6.5 7 7 7 6.8
6 3 7.5 7.2 7 8 7.4
7 4 9.5 8 9 8 8.9
8 5 7.2 7.5 7 7 7.3
9 6 6.5 6.5 6 7 6.5
10 7 8 9 8 7.5 8.3
11 8 8 8.8 9 8 8.3
Rubrics in BB9
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Excellent ProficientMeets exact
requirements
Minimal
requirementsBelow requirements
Task
Weight 20.00%
87 to 100 %
More than 2 points are
critically analysed.
Teaching presence is
strong, positive and
insightful Numerous
(more than 5) initial
and secondary
comments given
80 to 86 %
Points are useful
Teaching presence is
strong and positive
Numerous (more than
3) initial and
secondary comments
given
70 to 79 %
Points are
distinguished Teaching
presence positive
Numerous (more than
1) initial and
secondary comments
given
60 to 70 %
1 Point Teaching
presence evident 1
comment given
0 to 60 %
Unclear no teaching
presence no
comments given
Organization
Weight 30.00%
87 to 100 %
Structure of response
highlights point of topic
and reflects original
thinking Comments
and secondary
comments reflect,
incorporate and offer
new viewpoints
80 to 86 %
Structure of response
highlights point of topic
70 to 79 %
Structure of response
contributes to
understanding
60 to 70 %
Structure of response
contributes seems
somewhat confusing
Comments
acknowledge other
viewpoints
0 to 60 %
Structure of response
contributes is
confusing
Language
Weight 30.00%
87 to 100 %
Written text shows
glimpses of fluency
80 to 86 %
Written text is fully
comprehensible
70 to 79 %
Written text is fully
comprehensible with
effort.
60 to 70 %
Contains passages
that are not
comprehensible
0 to 60 %
Mainly
incomprehensible
Comments
Weight 20.00%
87 to 100 %
Comments and
secondary comments
reflect, incorporate and
offer new viewpoints
80 to 86 %
Comments reflect and
incorporate other
viewpoints
70 to 79 %
Comments reflect
understanding of other
viewpoints
60 to 70 %
Comments
acknowledge others
0 to 60 %
Comments do not
regularly acknowledge
other viewpoints
Resources
Click here for the excel sheet and original assessment document used in the rubric grading
Click here for another presentation on the use of discussion boards for assessment.
Click here for yet another discussion of discussion boards in BB9 and the community of inquiry