ex parte or late filed pam gre!il2.ryex parte or late filed jay keithley thursday, august 17, 2006...
TRANSCRIPT
EX PARTE OR LATE FILEDPam Gre!il2.ry _
••• Non-Public: For Internal Use Only'"
From:Sent:To:SUbject:
Thomas ChandlerThursday, August 17, 200612:40 PMPam GregoryFW: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
J
Tom ChandlerChief, Disability Rights OfficeConsumer and Governmental Affairs BureauFederal Communications CommissionROom 3-B431445 12th Street, S.W.Washington, D.C. 20554(202) 418-1475(cell) (703) 338-0372(TTY) (202) [email protected]
-----Original Message-----From: Marta Ordaz [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11 :22 AMTo: ThOmas ChandlerSubject: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
August 17,2006Thomas Chandler
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergency information must be captionedwith no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situations such as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video Programming Distributors to Make EmergencyInformation Accessible to Persons with Hearing Disabilities Using Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumerorganizations on August 14, 2006, CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Marta Ordaz456 Adelle StLivermore, CA 94551-6362
EX PARTE OR LATE FILEDPam GreQ~ory~ _
••• Non-Public: For Internal Use Only'"
Tom ChandlerChief, Disability Rights OfficeConsumer and Governmenta! Affairs BureauFederal Communications CommissionRoom 3-B431445 12th Street, SW.Washington, D.C. 20554(202) 418-1475(cell) (703) 338-0372(TTY) (202) [email protected]
From:Sent:To:Subject:
Thomas ChandlerThursday, August 17, 2006 12:43 PMPam GregoryFW: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
-----Original Message-----From: Susie Lai [mailto:[email protected]: Thursday, August 17, 200612:12 PMTo: Thomas ChandlerSubject: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
August 17,2006Thomas Chandier
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergency information must be captionedwith no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situations such as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video Programming Distributors to Make EmergencyInformation Accessible to Persons with Hearing Disabilities Using Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumerorganizations on August 14, 2006, CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Susie Lai587 14th AvenueSan Francisco, NY 94118-3552
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
Jay KeithleyThursday, August 17, 2006 3:16 PMPam GregoryThomas ChandlerFW: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
Pam Greg~0.:.lry,- _
From:Sent:To:Cc:Subject:
I will send you copies of all these that I receive.folder Tom has asked be created for these. Thanks.
Tom, this is FYI; I will not copy you on others.
.)_ <c~/I,
Please ensure that we keep a COPY"ofc~~(;h COrnPlaiKt in the ORO
••• Non-Public: For Internal Use Only'"
-----Original Message-----From: Susie Lai [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, August 17, 200612:12 PMTo: Jay KeithleySubject: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
August 17, 2006Jay Keithley
Dear Jay Keithley,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergency information must be captionedwith no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situations such as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video Programming Distributors to Make EmergencyInformation Accessible to Persons with Hearing Disabilities Using Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumerorganizations on August 14, 2006, CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Susie Lai587 14th AvenueSan Francisco, NY 94118-3552
EX PARTE OR LATE FILEDPam Greg2!X _
No.2; same language, different sender.
". Non-Public: For Internal Use Only'"
-----Original Message-----From: Roy Abueg [mailto:[email protected]: Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:02 PMTo: Jay KeithleySubject: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
Jay Kel\hleyThursday, August 17, 2006 3:22 PMPam GregoryFW: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
From:Sent:To:Subject:
August 17, 2006Jay Keithley
Dear Jay Keithley,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergency information must be captionedwith no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situations such as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video Programming Distributors to Make EmergencyInformation Accessible to Persons with Hearing Disabilities Using Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumerorganizations on August 14, 2006, CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Roy Abueg568 Parrott StSan Leandro, CA 94577-4435
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
Pam Greg:::0:.lry:... _
From:
Sent:To:SUbject:
Jay Keithley
Thursday, August 17, 2006 3:25 PMPam GregoryFW: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
NO.3
••• Non-Public: For Internal Use Only'"
-----Original Message-----From: Audrey Dunn [mailto:[email protected]: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11 :22 AMTo: Jay KeithleySubject: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
August 17, 2006Jay Keithley
Dear Jay Keithley,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergency information must be captionedwith no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situations such as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video Programming Distributors to Make EmergencyInformation Accessible to Persons with Hearing Disabilities Using Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumerorganizations on August 14, 2006, CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Audrey Dunn620 Terrace WaySpace 16Bakersfield, CA 93304-3800
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
o"
'··~~".;".01J
Jay Ke'llhleyThursday, August 17, 2006 3:25 PMPam GregoryFW: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
NO.4
-----Original Message-----From: Marta Ordaz [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, August 17,2006 11 :22 AMTo: Jay KeithleySubject: Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
••• Non-Public: For Internal Use Only'"
Pam Greg:;;;0.iolry&.. _
From:Sent:To:SUbject:
August 17,2006Jay Keithley
Dear Jay Keithley,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergency information must be captionedwith no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situations such as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video Programming Distributors to Make EmergencyInformation Accessible to Persons with Hearing Disabilities Using Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumerorganizations on August 14, 2006, CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Marta Ordaz456 Adelle 5tLivermore, CA 94551-6362
EX PARTE OR LATE FILEDThomas Chandler
From:Sent:To:Subject:
August 21, 2006Thomas Chandler
John Roberson [email protected]]Monday, August 21,20066:42 PMThomas ChandlerDon't roll back on emergency captioning!
I
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
'John Roberson 14703 Tara Woods Drive EastJacksonville, FL 32210-7971
1
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
Thomas Chandler
From:Sent:To:'Subject:
August 24, 2006Thomas Chandler
Carrie Foster [[email protected]]Thursday, August 24, 2006 3:52 PMThomas ChandlerDon't roll back on emergency captioning!
)
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
ICarrie FosterPO Box 605Waterbury, VT
I05676-0605
1
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
From:Sent:To:Subject:
August 25, 2006Thomas Chandler
Sheila Conlon Mentkowski [s.mentkowski@comcastnet} IFriday, August 25, 2006 8: 12 PMThomas Chandler J f)~Don't roll back on emergency captioning! Jj /<1'
o u,.-" v,
/
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC clariflcation of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Sheila Conlon Mentkowski7502 Windbridge Dr Apt 100Sacramento, CA 95831-5239
1
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
Thomas Chandler
From:Sent:To:SUbject:
August 26, 2006Thomas Chandler
marsha brown [urbanhappiness@aoLcom]Saturday, August 26, 2006 10:42 PMThomas ChandlerDon't roll back on emergency captioning!
..'j
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC clarifkcation of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
marsha brown5015 lofty pines circle eastjax, FL 32210-7909
1
r;;x PARTE OR LATE FILED
Thomas Chandler
From:Sent:To:Subject:
August 28, 2006Thomas Chandler
Roger Benn [[email protected]]Monday, Augusl28, 2006 9: 12 AMThomas ChandlerDon't roll back on emergency captioning!
Dear Thomas Chandler,
,The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14/ 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Roger Benn55 Farnham StCazenovia, NY 13035-1113
1
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
Thomas Chandler
From:Sent:To:Subject:
August 20, 2006Thomas Chandlet
Robert Hames [[email protected]]Sunday, August 20,200611:12 PMThomas ChandlerDon't roll back on emergency captioning!
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely f
Robert Hames5026 Lofty Pines Circle EJacksonville, FL 32210-7910
1
EX PAPTi= n,::{ LATE FILED QS-~J /Thomas Chandler
:.~)-.
From:Sent:To:Subject:
August 21, 2006Thomas Chandler
Donald Rul/ [donrul/@aoLcom]Monday, August 21,20068:32 AMThomas ChandlerDon't roll back on emergency captioning!
Dear Thomas Chandler,
",' ....--'~~
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Donald Rull5481 101st St.,Jacksonville, FL 32210-8912
1
os- ~3/EX PARTE OR LATE FILED .
[email protected] wrole on 81H1200\\ ".?>?>J5 Po,M '.
August 16, 2006
Kevin J. Martin, ChairmanMichael J. Copps, CommissionerJonathan S. Adelstein, CommissionerDeborah Taylor Tate, CommissionerRobert M. McDowell, Commissioner
Dear Commissioners,
"\.)'~' ...~ .. '"
)
' ..,
This is to let you know that I fUlly support the petition filed by TDI and other national organizations with the FederalCommunications Commission (FCC) on August 14, 2006 requesting that you rescind your clarification of 8/7106regarding captioning of emergency announcements on TV.
Given that the local broadcasters in the top 25 television markets currently have real-time closed captioningcapabilities, and provide captions routinely for their local news shows, I fully expect them to provide closedcaptioning for all breaking news, inclUding emergency announcements that are broadcast to their viewers.
For example, I live in Texas, and if there is a tornado, J would want my local TV station to tell me using closedcaptions when the tornado is about to strike, its current direction and speed, immediate action to take, and when itis safe to go outside again.
Closed captioning gives me many more details, nearly equal to what is audible. While visual information iswelcome via other methods, such as crawls, signs, and graphics, the information that they convey is limited, andthis can endanger my life, health, and safety, and property during an emergency. My survival needs are equallyimportant to those of others in the community.
I support TOI's request that the FCC withdraw its August 7, 2006 clarification notice, and continue to maintain itseffective enforcement of its current 79.2 regulations on emergency information broadcasts. Human lives areprecious, and access to safety information is a vital American right!
Thank you for your consideration,
Sincerely,
Jacqueline Doyle2600 Gracy Farms Ln 1416
Austin, TX [email protected]
cc: Monica Desai, Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs BureauJay Keithley, Deputy Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs BureauTom Chandler, Chief, Disability Rights Office
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
Thomas Chandler
From:Sent:To:Subject:
August 21, 2006Thomas Chandler
Susan Hernandez [[email protected]]Monday, August 21, 20065:32 PMThomas ChandlerDon't roll back on emergency captioning!
.. y
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Susan Hernandez121 Raleigh Ln
,West Islip, NY 11795-22241
1
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
Thomas Chandler
From:Sent:To:Subject:
August 29, 2006Thomas Chandler
Celeste Gross [[email protected]]Tuesday, August 29,200611:12 PMThomas ChandlerDon't roll back on emergency captioning!
.,
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC clarification of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. Everyone must be aware of emergency'situations suer as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231,
Sincerely/
Celeste Gross529 46th StreetBaltimore, MD 21224-3107
1
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED
Thomas Chandler
From:Sent:To;
Subject:
August 29, 2006Thomas Chandler
William Monteiro [[email protected]. August 30. 2006 12:52 AMThomas Chandler
Don't roll back on emergency captioning!
Dear Thomas Chandler,
IThe FCC clarif~cation of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely/
William Monteiro9 Hodges Ave # 3 Apt.P.O. Box 581Taunton, MA 02780-3028
1
Thomas Chandler
From:
Sent:To:SUbject:
August 29, 2006Thomas Chandler
EX PARTE OR LATE FILED 1.... ,Q:''' ~'/
Brooke Newell lhearingimpairecl@hotmai\.com]Tuesday, August 29,20062:32 PMThomas ChandlerDon't roll back on emergency captioningl.
"(i,'.''''",
Dear Thomas Chandler,
The FCC Clarif~cation of the emergency captioning requirements was wrong. All emergencyinformation must be captioned with no exceptions. I must be aware of emergency situationssuch as a terror alert or impending natural disaster.
I support the Application for Review of Clarification of Obligation of Video ProgrammingDistributors to Make Emergency Information Accessible to Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesUsing Closed Captioning, sent by seven national consumer organizations on August 14, 2006,CG-Docket # 05-231.
Sincerely,
Brooke Newell71 Glenwood AveQueensbury, NY 12804-1728
1