evrest: electric vehicle with · pdf filesolution contributing to electromobility by...
TRANSCRIPT
07-02-2014 EVREST – Presentation
EVREST: Electric Vehicle with Range
Extender as a Sustainable Technology.
Rochdi TRIGUI
IFSTTAR
Project coordinator
Electromobility+ mid-term seminar
Copenhagen, 6-7 February 2014
2
• Project goal
• Project structure
• WPs progress, first results
• Management and dissemination
• Next steps and perspectives
Outline
Goal and methodology
Proposed approach:
• To identify actual needs of European mobility through existing data
• To define and optimize the size of different solutions based on EREV fromuses’ specifications
• To build scenarios for forecasting EREV possible diffusion
• To evaluate the solutions (use + technology):
– Environmental aspects (LCA)
– Acceptability (sociological, economical, …)
– Recharging facilities
• 3
Main objective: to evaluate Extended Range Electric Vehicle as an optimizedsolution contributing to electromobility by addressing:
- Battery size (cost) according to the users expected range- Driver psychological assurance (guaranteed range)
DD.MM.YY 4
WP1User needs analysis of existing data
WP2Simulated sizing and optimization of technologies
WP3Development of scenarios for electromobility
WP4Impact on gridand charging
facilities
WP5Environmental
Impact
WP7Synthesis, Sustainable Development Analysis
and recommendations
Specifications
Development
Evaluation
WP6Assessment of
the userperspective
WP
8:M
anagem
ent,
exp
loita
tion
and
dis
sem
inatio
n
Structure
WP1: Segmentation of car use profilesfor EREV
Clustering algorithmUsing WP6 parameters
data from MOP Surveydata from FNT Survey
0
50
100
150
200
days
per
year
km per day
020406080
100120
days
per
year
km per day
0
50
100
150
200
days
per
year
km per day
Clu
ste
r2
Clu
ste
r3
Yearly Mileage4427 km
Yearly Mileage5193 km
Yearly Mileage11884 km
Yearly Mileage12074 km
6
WP2: Simulation based EREV design
Peugeot Scooter Engine : 10 kW
Cluster 2Small Class
Degraded Mode Max Speed
Based on anitem of WP6
Survey
Cluster2Electric range
Vehicle and components modelsUsing IFSTTAR-VEHLIB software
300 kmTotal range
Cost Based Performance Based
Simulation results :- EREVs components characteristics- Electricity and fuel consumption
7
0
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
12.000
14.000
16.000
18.000
BEV small EREV 1 small EREV 2 small
kg
CO
2-e
q.
Global Warming Potential (GWP) [kg CO2-eq.]
Use (fuel consumption)
Use (electricity consumption)
Maintenance (battery system)
Production car (conventional)
Production combustion engine
Production generator
Production power electronics
Production electric motor
Production battery system
Production vehicle chassis
WP5: Interim results – Small vehicles,Cluster 2 Germany
WP2 => EREV1: cost based designEREV2: performance based design
and Software
EREV LCA modelin GaBi Database
and Software
WP4: Grid mix
Graphical illustration ofspatially differentiated LCAresults with GIS Software
WP4: Traffic model
Further work
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109 121 133 145 157 169 181
New
car'
sm
arke
tsh
are
[%]
Month
Diesel cars; "low";
Diesel cars; "likely";
EREV; "high";
Diesel cars; "high";
BEV; "high";
EREV; "likely";
EREV; "low";
BEV; "likely";
BEV; "low";
Year 2025Year 2010
WP3: Preliminary results – example ofGerman car market
Scenarios setting: Development of 3 future framework scenarios for electromobility(optimistic (high), pessimistic (low) and most likely), Collection of 21 indicators forFrance, Germany, Austria (for the base year 2010 – and prognosis 2025),
WP4: Simulation of EREV usage and applicationin the Stuttgart metropolitan area
Simulation of EREV usage•Multi agent simulation modelmobiTopp
•Stuttgart metropolitan area
•Three EREV scenarios
•Model extension to one week
•Implementation of EREVs
Impact of EREV usage onthe energy system• Electricity generation
• Distribution grid: Critical massof simultaneously chargingEREVs in two test grids
… 2.5 mio. agents Ele
ctric
car
mile
age;
time
of
batt
ery
charg
ing
The 10th car… The 8th car…
… is critical
10
– First survey with 61 participants – participant profile:• Potential early EV customers (applicants/participants in EV field trial)
• Sufficient practical experience with limited-range mobility
• Mobility profile: substantial daily distances (average: 111 km)
– Is an EREV concept generally accepted by potential EVcostumers?
10
Pri
cein
€
BEV, 150 km BREREV, 50 km BR,150 km FPR
EREV, 50 km BR,300 km FPR
EREV, 100 km BR,300 km FPR
BR = battery rangeFPR = full-performance range
WP6 – user perspective oncritical aspects of EREVs
DD.MM.YY 11
Contribution to key dimensions
« technological strategies »:Provide inputs for manufacturers and decision makers about:
- EREV technology with different battery sizing- The expected performances (range, speed, LCA)
« Socio economic issues »:- EREV penetration scenario’s up to 2025- Use and user patterns, social acceptability of EREV
« Research and development »:- vehicle architecture: EREV power train designintegrated methodology directly linked to use data.
• 6 project meetings : 2 Paris, Chemnitz, Karlsruhe, Vienna, Lyon
• Expert workshop, Vienna June 2013
• Deliverables D1.1 and D1.2 available
• Advisory board constituted (Renault, BMW, Austrian FederalMinistry for Transport)
• Project website : http://www.evrest-project.org/
• Project shared space: http://listes.ifsttar.fr/wws/info/evrest-partners
• 2 TRA2014 Conference accepted papers, to be presented in april2014 in Paris
12
Project management anddissemination
• WP2: Catalogue of EREV designs (ongoing delivrable) and study of theFuel Cell based EREV
• WP3: Framework and trends for electromobility including EREV (ongoingdelivrable)
• WP4: Assigning EREV use to households in the Stuttgart metropolitan areaand assessing impact on the grid
• WP5: More detailed and spatially differentiated LCA of the selected designsof EREV
• WP6: Finalize surveys and conclusions on users perspectives
• WP7: Setting the methodology of the results synthesis
• Dissemination of the project results
• Possible extension of the developed approach to other kind of vehicles
13
Next steps and perspectives
14
Thank you for you attention.
Rochdi TRIGUIEVREST project coordinator
WP2: Example of Simulation results
15
Small Class
Reference BEV Cluster 2ICE
Cost Based
Cluster 2ICE
Cost Based
Battery Size (kW.h) 16 9 9
RE Size (kW) - 5 5
Weight 1200 1159 1159
Yearly elec.Consumption (kW.h/y)
/771 / 904
628 767
Yearly gasolineConsumption (L/y)
- 52 49
12 yearsTotal Cost (€)
PurchaseEnergy during 12y
/30820 / 32210
296001200 / 2600
27070251501920
28280251503130
Vehicle : 16 000 €Battery : 850 €/kW.hRE : 300 €/kW
Elec : 0,13 €/kW.hGasol. : 1,5 €/L
Elec : 0,24 €/kW.hGasol. : 1,56 €/L
WP1 : Segmentation of car users profiles
16
N [-] P [%]R1
[km]R2
[km]R3
[km]
12 85 300 50 90
WP6 Surveyfirst results
ConsortiumEnginneering&Human Science
17