evolution & organisation of metabolic pathways bas kooijman dept of theoretical biology vrije...
Post on 15-Jan-2016
223 views
TRANSCRIPT
Evolution & organisation of metabolic pathways
Bas KooijmanDept of Theoretical Biology
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdamhttp://www.bio.vu.nl/thb/deb/
Amsterdam, 2004/03/31the dynamic structure of life
adul
t
embryo
juvenile
Dynamic Energy Budgettheory for
metabolic organisation
Central Metabolism
polymers
monomers
waste/source
source
• Pentose Phosphate (PP) cycle glucose-6-P ribulose-6-P, NADP NADPH• Glycolysis glucose-6-P pyruvate ADP + P ATP • TriCarboxcyl Acid (TCA) cycle pyruvate CO2
NADP NADPH• Respiratory chain NADPH + O2 NADP + H2O ADP + P ATP
Modules of central metabolism
Evolution of central metabolism
i = inverseACS = acetyl-CoA Synthase pathway PP = Pentose Phosphate cycleTCA = TriCarboxylic Acid cycle
RC = Respiratory Chain Gly = Glycolysis
Kooijman, Hengeveld 2003 The symbiontic nature of metabolic evolution Acta Biotheoretica (to appear)
in prokaryotes (= bacteria)3.8 Ga 2.7 Ga
Prokaryotic metabolic evolution
Chemolithotrophy • acetyl-CoA pathway• inverse TCA cycle• inverse glycolysis
Phototrophy:• el. transport chain• PS I & PS II• Calvin cycle
Heterotrophy:• pentose phosph cycle• glycolysis• respiration chain
Early ATP generationFeS2
FeS
H2
2H+
H2SS0
S0
H2S
2OH-
2H+
ADPATP
Pi2e-
2H2O
FeS + S0 FeS2
ADP + Pi ATP• ATPase• hydrogenase• S-reductase
Madigan et al 1997
Synthesizing Units:generalized enzymesprocess arriving fluxes of substratereversed flux is smallmixtures of processing schemes are possible
Substrate processingFractions of SU·· unbound A· SU-A complex ·B SU-B complexAB SU-A,B complex
Kooijman, 2001
Biomass: reserve(s) + structure(s)Reserve(s), structure(s): generalized compounds, mixtures of proteins, lipids, carbohydrates: fixed composition
Reserve(s) do complicate model & implications & testingReasons to delineate reserve, distinct from structure• metabolic memory• biomass composition depends on growth rate• explanation of respiration patterns (freshly laid eggs don’t respire) method of indirect calorimetry fluxes are linear sums of assimilation, dissipation and growth inter-species body size scaling relationships• fate of metabolites (e.g. conversion into energy vs buiding blocks)
Reserve vs structure
Reserve does not mean: “set apart for later use” compounds in reserve can have active functions
Life span of compounds in• reserve: limited due to turnover of reserve all reserve compounds have the same mean life span
• structure: controlled by somatic maintenance structure compounds can differ in mean life span
Important difference between reserve and structure: no maintenance costs for reserveEmpirical evidence: freshly laid eggs consist of reserve and do not respire
Homeostasis
Homeostasis: constant body composition in varying environments
Strong homeostasis generalized compounds applies to reserve(s) and structure(s) separately
Weak homeostasis: ratio reserve/structure becomes and remains constant if food or substrate is constant (while the individual is growing) applies to juvenile and adult stages, not to embryos
Implication: stoichiometric constraints on growth
DEB decomposition into• assimilation (substrate reserve) catabolic & anabolic aspect• maintenance (reserve products)• growth (reserve structure) catabolic & anabolic aspect
yield coefficients vary with growthreserve, structure differ in compositioncomposition of biomass varies with growth
Methanotrophs
Kooijman, Andersen & Kooi 2004
Macro-chemical reaction at fixed growth rate
OHYNOCHYNHYCOYCH
HXnnnCX
NXCX
NWOWHW 2
324
)1(
CO2
NH3
CH4
O2
reserve
DEB decomposition into• assimilation (substrate reserve) catabolic & anabolic aspect• maintenance (reserve products)• growth (reserve structure) catabolic & anabolic aspect
yield coefficients vary with growthreserve, structure differ in compositioncomposition of biomass varies with growth rm = 0.003 h-1; kE = 0.0127 h-1; kM = 0.0008 h-1
ySE = 8.8; yVE = 0.8 nHE = 2; nOE = 0.46; nNE = 0.25 nHV = 2; nOV = 0.51; nNV = 0.125
Anammox
Brandt, 2002
Macro-chemical reaction at r = 0.0014 h-1
OHNOCHNON
HHCONONH
215.05.0232
324
030.2068.0260.0025.1
128.0068.032.11
Nitrogen cycle
CHON= biomass
some cyanobacteria, Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Azorhizobium, Klebsiella, Rhizobium,some others
Brocadia anammoxidans
Nitrosomonas
Nitrobacter
many
Some crucial conversions depend on few species
SyntrophyCoupling hydrogen & methane production energy generation aspect at aerobic/anaerobic interface
HOHCCHOCOOHC
OHCHHCHOH
HHOHCOOHOHC
222
34
42222
33242262
2432
23322262
ethanol acetate dihydrogen
dihydrogen methane
methane hydrates >300 m deep, < 8Clinked with nutrient supply
bicarbonate
Total:
Product Formation
throughput rate, h-1
glyc
erol
, eth
anol
, g/l
pyru
vate
, mg/
l
glycerol
ethanol
pyru
vate
Glucose-limited growth of SaccharomycesData from Schatzmann, 1975
According to Dynamic Energy Budget theory:
Product formation rate = wA . Assimilation rate + wM . Maintenance rate + wG . Growth rate
For pyruvate: wG<0
Applies to all products, heat & non-limiting substrates
Indirect calorimetry (Lavoisier, 1780): heat = wO JO + wC JC + wN JN
No reserve: 2-dim basis for product formation
Symbiosis
product
substrate
Symbiosis
substrate substrate
Internalization
Structures merge Reserves merge
Free-living, clusteringFree-living, homogeneous
Steps in symbiogenesis
throughput rate
Chemostat Steady Statesbi
omas
s de
nsit
y
hostsymbiont
Free livingProducts substitutable
Free livingProducts complementary
EndosymbiosisExchange on conc-basis
Exchange on flux-basis Structures merged Reserves mergedHost uses 2 substrates
Symbiogenesis
• symbioses: fundamental organization of life based on syntrophy ranges from weak to strong interactions; basis of biodiversity• symbiogenesis: evolution of eukaryotes (mitochondria, plastids)• DEB model is closed under symbiogenesis: it is possible to model symbiogenesis of two initially independently living populations that follow the DEB rules by incremental changes of parameter values such that a single population emerges that again follows the DEB rules• essential property for models that apply to all organisms
Kooijman, Auger, Poggiale, Kooi 2003 Quantitative steps in symbiogenesis and the evolution of homeostasisBiological Reviews 78: 435 - 463
Symbiogenesis1.5-2 Ga 1.2 Ga
Eukaryote metabolic evolution
First eukaryotes: heterotrophs by symbiogenesis compartmental cellular organisationAcquisition of phototrophy frequently did not result in loss of heterotrophyAcquisition of membrane transport between internalization of mitochondria and plastids
No phagocytosis in fungi & plants; loss? pinocytosis in animals = phagocytosis in e.g. amoeba?Direct link between phagocytosis and membrane transport?
Membrane traffic
From: Duve, C. de 1984 A guided tour of the living cell, Sci. Am. Lib., New York
The golgi apparatus servesas a central clearing houseand channel between the endo- and exoplasmic domains
1 ER-Golgi shuttle2 secretory shuttle between Golgi and plasma membrane2’ crinophagic diversion3 Golgi-lysosome shuttle3’ alternative route from Golgi to lyosomes via the plasma membrane and an endosome4 endocytic shuttle between the plasma membrane and an endosome4’ alternative endocytic pathway bypassing an endosome5 plasma membrane retrieval6 endosome-lysosome pathway7 autophagic segregation
Clathrin unknown in prokaryotes
Chloroplast dynamics
Coordinated movement of chloroplasts through cells
Bacillariophyceae(diatoms)
(brown algae)Phaeophyceae
Prymnesiophyceae
RaphidophyceaeXanthophyceae
EustigmatophyceaeDictyochophyceae
Pelagophyceae
ChrysophyceaeSynurophyceae
Cryptophyceae
(plants)Cormophyta
(green algae)Chlorophyceae
(red algae)Rhodophyceae
Glaucophyceae
animals
Euglenozoa
Dinozoa
Rhizopoda
Bicosoecia
Actinopoda
Pseudofungi
Labyrinthulomycota
MyxomycotaProtostelida Ciliophora
Sporozoa
Bacteria
Zygomycota
BasidiomycotaAscomycota
Archamoeba
Microsporidia
Chytridiomycota
Percolozoa
Bigyromonada
Metamonada
Choanozoa
GranuloreticulataXenophyophora
Loukozoa
PlasmodiophoromycotaChlorarachnida
Cercomonada
Apusozoa
Pedinellophyceae
Bolidophyceae
Composed byBas Kooijman
Opalinata
Glomeromycota
Survey of organisms
mitochondria
secondarychloroplast
primary chloroplast
tertiarychloroplast
Sizes of blobsdo not reflect
number of species
Bacteria
Opi
stho
kont
s
Chromista
Amoebozoa
Alveo-lates
Plantae
Excavates
Ret
aria
Cercozoa
fungi
animals
forams
cort
ical
alv
eoli
Bik
ont
DH
FR
-TS
gen
e fu
sion
chlo
ropl
asts
mem
br. d
ynun
ikon
t
loss phagoc.gap junctions tissues (nervous)
bicentriolarmainly chitin
EF1 insertion
trip
le r
oots
mai
nly
cell
lose
photosymbionts
Cells, individuals, colonies
• plasmodesmata connect cytoplasm; cells form a symplast: plants
• pits and large pores connect cytoplasm: fungi, rhodophytes
• multinucleated cells occur; individuals can be unicellular: fungi, Eumycetozoa, Myxozoa, ciliates, Xenophyophores, Actinophryids, Biomyxa, diplomonads, Gymnosphaerida, haplosporids, Microsporidia, nephridiophagids, Nucleariidae, plasmodiophorids, Pseudospora, Xanthophyta (e.g. Vaucheria), most classes of Chlorophyta (Chlorophyceae, Ulvophyceae, Charophyceae (in mature cells) and all Cladophoryceae, Bryopsidophyceae and Dasycladophyceae)) • cells inside cells: Paramyxea • uni- and multicellular stages: multicellular spores in unicellular myxozoa, gametes• individuals can remain connected after vegetative propagation: plants, corals, bryozoans• individuals in colonies can strongly interact and specialize for particular tasks: syphonophorans, insects, mole rats
vague boundaries
Kooijman, Hengeveld 2003 The symbiontic nature of metabolic evolution Acta Biotheoretica (to appear)
rotiferConochilus hippocrepisHeterocephalus glaber
(Endo)symbiosisFrequent association between photo- and heterotroph photo hetero: carbohydrates (energy supply) photo hetero: nutrients (frequently NH3 or NO3
-) most (perhaps all) plants have myccorrhizas, the symbiosis combines photolithotrophy and organochemotrophy
Also frequent: association between phototroph and N2-fixer where N2-fixer plays role of heterotroph
Symbiosis: living together in interaction (basic form of life)Mutualism: “benefit” for both partners symbioses need not be mutualistic “benefit” frequently difficult to judge and anthropocentricSyntrophy: one lives of products of another (e.g. faeces) can be bilateral; frequent basis of symbiosis
Chlorochromatium (Chlorobibacteria, Sphingobacteria)
From: Margulis, L & Schwartz, K.V.1998 Five kingdoms.Freeman, NY
(= Chlorochromatium)
(Endo)symbiosisParamecium bursariaParamecium bursariaciliate with green algaeciliate with green algae
Ophrydium versatileOphrydium versatileciliate with green algaeciliate with green algae
PeltigeraPeltigeraascomycete with green algaeascomycete with green algae
Cladonia diversaCladonia diversaascomycete with green algaeascomycete with green algae
(Endo)symbiosis
Chlorophyte symbiontsChlorophyte symbiontsvisible through microscopevisible through microscope
Lichen Lichen Cladonia portentosaCladonia portentosa
Grazed by reindeer in winterGrazed by reindeer in winterRangifer tarandusRangifer tarandus
Mitochondria
Transformations:1 Oxaloacetate + Acetyl CoA + H2O = Citrate + HSCoA2 Citrate = cis-Aconitrate + H2O3 cis-Aconitrate + H2O = Isocitrate4 Isocitrate + NAD+ = α-Ketoglutarate + CO2 + NADH + H+
5 α-Ketoglutarate + NAD+ + HSCoA = Succinyl CoA + CO2 + NADH + H+
6 Succinyl CoA + GDP 3- + Pi 2- + H+ = Succinate + GTP 4- + HSCoA
7 Succinate + FAD = Fumarate + FADH2
8 Fumarate + H2O = Malate9 Malate + NAD+ = Oxaloacetate + NADH + H+
TriCarboxylic Acid cycle (= Krebs cycle)
Enzymes pass metabolites directly to other enzymes enzymes catalizing transformations 5 & 7: bound to inner membrane (and FAD/FADH2)Net transformation: Acetyl-CoA + 3 NAD+ + FAD + GDP 3- + Pi
2- + 2 H2O = 2 CO2 + 3 NADH + FADH2 + GTP 4- + 2 H+ + HS-CoA
Dual function of intermediary metabolites building blocks energy substrate all eukaryotes
once possessed mitochondria,most still do
enzymes are located in metabolon;channeling of metabolites
Pathways & allocation
reserve
reservereserve
maintenance
maintenance
maintenance
structure structure
structure
Mixture of products &intermediary metabolites
that is allocated tomaintenance (or growth)has constant composition
Kooijman & Segel, 2004
Numerical matching for n=4P
rodu
ct f
lux
Rej
ecte
d fl
ux
Unb
ound
fra
ctio
n
= 0.73, 0.67, 0.001, 0.27 handshaking = 0.67, 0.91, 0.96, 0.97 binding probk = 0.12, 0.19, 0.54, 0.19 dissociation nSE = 0.032,0.032,0.032,0.032 # in reservenSV = 0.045,0.045,0.045,0.045 # in structureyEV = 1.2 res/struct kE = 0.4 res turnover jEM = 0.02 maint flux n0E = 0.05 sub in res
0
0
1
1
1
2
2
23
3
3
4
4
Spec growth rate
Spec growth rate
Matching pathway whole cellNo exact match possible between production of products and intermediary metabolites by pathway and requirements by the cell
But very close approximation is possible by tuning abundance parameters and/or binding and handshaking parameters
Good approximation requires all four tuning parameters per node growth-dependent reserve abundance plays a key role in tuning
VSES iinn ,
ii αρ ,
Kooijman, S. A. L. M. and Segel, L. A. (2004) How growth affects the fate of cellular substrates.Bull. Math. Biol. (to appear)