evidence based primary prevention the icelandic …...2013 icsra reykjavik university evidence based...
TRANSCRIPT
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Evidence based primary preventionThe Icelandic Model
Gothenburg │Förebygg.nu
November 2013
Jón Sigfússon©ICSRA / Reykjavik University
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
42
35
3233
2628
26
2225
18 19
14
97
5
23
1916
15 14 1412
11 12 1010
75
3
1715
12 11 12 13
9 9 97
66
32
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
%
What if these were corporate results?
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
42
35
3233
2628
26
2225
18 19
14
97
5
23
1916
15 14 1412
11 12 1010
75
3
1715
12 11 12 13
9 9 97
66
32
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
%
What if these were corporate results?
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Substance use decrease amongst 15-16 year old adolescents
42
3532
33
26 2826
2225
18 19
149
7
5
23
1916
15 14 14 12 11 12 1010
7
3
1715
12 11 12 13
9 9 97 6 6
3 30
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
%
Drunk last 30 days
Daily smoking
Hashish once or more
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
How has this been achieved?
• Research as a basis for policy and actions on the local and national level
• An evidence based bottom up approach – not top down
• Prevention work has been focused on risk and protective factors in the lives of youth
• Managed to keep a constant dialogue betweenall those who are responsible for preventionin the close community of the children
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Structure of presentation
1. The role of research in prevention work
2. Background of the prevention model
3. Methodology, characteristics and emphasis
4. Actions in regard to primary prevention
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The role of research
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
ICSRA background
• A governmental Youth Research Institution
from 1992 focusing on education and upbringing
of youth
• ICSRA established 1998 with a broad focus on all
aspects of youth research
• Lead Youth Research Institution since 1998
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
ICSRA specialization
• 10 to 13 year old in Primary school:
• 2000-2013 – Bi-annually (Prognostic factors)
• 14 to 16 year old in Primary school:
• 1992-2013 – Annually (Status and development)
• 16 to 20 year old in High school/Junior college:
• 1992-2013 – Every third year
• Dropout students
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Indicators
Health status indicators, anxiety, depressive
symptoms, physical health status, lifestyle and
leisure time activities, local community networks,
negative life events and strain, parents and family,
peer group economic and psychological issues,
studies and school, substance use, values and
attitudes, violence and delinquency, and more…
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The twofold use of research
1. Scientific
2. Practical
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The scientific role of research
1. In depth analysis of the data
2. 50 peer reviewed papers past 5 years
3. Publications in journals in Europe and USA
4. Science forms the platform for practice
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Collaborators
• Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
• Kings College, London
• University of Ireland, Galway
• Reykjavik University
• University of California, Irvine
• Columbia University, NY
• University of Iceland
• Penn State University
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The practical role of research
1. Population data collection on substance use
every year (no samples, always population).
2. Practical descriptive reports within 2-3 months of
each data collection to the municipalities
3. School reports to the schools
4. Local information INTO all levels of prevention
work is a key issue
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Importance of frequent measuring
• Every school, every parent, every
prevention worker can see the current
situation in their close community and
can act accordingly.
• Not 2-3 years later but almost
immediately
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Childrens rights
• Children have the right to have a say about
what they want, what they do and how they
feel.
• We have the obligation to make good use of
what they tell us, react and constantly try to
make their lives better.
• People agree on this today
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Prevention approachBackground
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
In the year 1992
• Governmental decision to start collecting
data from 15-16 year old students.
• Aim: To see if and how information collected
could benefit policymaking and decisions for
actions in youth matters in general.
• Several data collections until 1998
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Upward trend 1992 – 1998
15,1
20,722,8
7,2
9,6
17,4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
%
Smoke daily Have tried hashish
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
1998
• At this point of time research already showed
us that certain circumstances and behavior in
the lives of adolescents was strongly
connected with use.
• We tried to establish the risk and
protective factors.
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The four main risk and protective factors
Familyfactors
Peer group effect
General well being
Extracurricular
activities, sports
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
And analyzing deeper
Familyfactors
Peer group
General well being
Extracurricular
activities
Time spent with parentsSupportMonitoringControl
Organized activitiesvs.
unorganized
Inside and outside of school, at home, bullying e.t.c.
Positive and negative effects.How we as parents approach the peer groupStaying outside late
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
1998 Drug-free Iceland
• Based on these findings a research based action
plan was initiated by the government with the
aim to try out a totally new methodology in
substance use prevention.
• Obviously, what had been done before, was not
working.
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Organizations promoting drug free areas in 2013
• Common phrases in declarations/mission statements:
• Fight against drugs, Attack or Combat drugs
• Intensify police measures, Offensive actions against
drugs, School action plans against drugs
• … and a lot of handshakes and resolutions …
• Very little on evidence-based work, role of parents,
addressing risk factors in the close community and
informal social control
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Aim of Drug free Iceland
• To change the actual behavior of youth and
not only their attitudes
• Change the life-style environment of our
children so that they would be in lesser risk of
substance use
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The methodology
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Our focus is primary prevention
•Primary prevention, preventing the development of
substance use before it starts
•Secondary prevention, that refers to measures that
detect substance use
•Tertiary prevention efforts that focus on people
already abusing substances
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Substance use follows cohortsSigfusdottir et al. 2011, Global Health Promotion
20
41
57
10
25
41
8
22
32
4
12
21
614 16
1 6
11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
13 14 15 13 14 15
Cohort 1984 Cohort 1991
%
Lifetime drunkenness
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Substance use follows cohortsSigfusdottir et al. 2011, Global Health Promotion
20
40
57
10
25
41
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
13 14 15 13 14 15
Cohort 1984 Cohort 1991
%
Lifetime drunkenness
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
What else could we tell the policymakers?
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of girls in 9th and 10th grade who have become drunkin the last 30 days depending on how much time they spend with parents
42,0
27,8
17,612,0 10,4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Girls who have become drunk last 30 days
%
Almost never Seldom Sometimes Often Almost always
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of students in 9th and 10th grade who have become drunk in the last 30 days depending on if their friends become drunk once pr. month.
4,6
23,3
49,3
68,2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Boys who have become drunk past 30 days
%
None or few A few Many Almost all
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of students in 9th and 10th grade who smoke daily depending on if they practice sports
12,5
24,9
10,4 9,9
4,0 3,5
0
10
20
30
40
50
Boys who smoke daily Girls who smoke daily
%
Almost never Up to 3 times pr. week 4 times or more often
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Main actionsBased on the research findings
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Local actions – examples:
• Research as a basis in policymaking and actions
• Strengthen parent organizations and cooperation
• Support extra – curricular activities / sports
• Support active NGOs´
• Support Young people at risk inside schools
• Form co-operative work groups against drugs
• Anti smoking/drinking campains
• Strengthen social capital
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
National actions – examples:
• Legal age of adulthood raised from 16 to 18 years
• Age limits to buy tobacco and alcohol (18 and 20)
• Strict regulations for sellers of tobacco
• A total advertising ban of tobacco and alcohol
• Restricted access to buying alcohol and tobacco
• Total visibility ban of tobacco and alcohol
• Rules on outside hours for adolecents
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Visibility ban of tobacco
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Outside hours reminder
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Rules on outside hours
• Why? Risk factor to “hang out” late with peers
• Addressed to parents to encourage sleep of children
• Stickers on every refrigerator
• Under 12 year old 20:00 from 1st of May to 1st of
September (summer) and until 22 in winter.
• 13 to 16 year old until midnight in summer and
22:00 in winter.
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The scientific isolation needed to be broken
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The researchers “guru“ approach
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
We needed to focus on close community
• How could an average figure on alcohol use in
Sweden help prevention workers in Gothenburg?
• “Average” is the biggest liar!
• Population research / yearly
• Reports to 80% of municipalities
• School reports to 70% of schools
• Local information within 2-3 months of data
collection each year
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Every school can see where students stand. Local figures for smoking in 33 gymnasiums (16-19)
2,3
5,2 5,8 6
,6 7,9 8,5 8,8
8,9 9,1
9,2 1
0,6
11
,9
12
,0
12
,5
12
,5
12
,6
12
,8
12
,8
13
,2
14
,3
14
,9
15
,5
15
,6
16
,9
17
,1 18
,6
19
,8
20
,9
21
,0 23
,1 25
,5 27
,0
31
,4
0
10
20
30
40
50
Sch
oo
l
Av
era
ge
Sch
oo
l
%
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Local information fuels dialogue
• Dialogue between key stakeholders
• Politicians, municipalities and local authorities
• Parental groups and family planners
• School authorities and school workers
• Health educators, health and social services
• Leisure time workers, prevention workers
• Sports and youth institutions
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The way we work now
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Knowing is not enough.
How do you act?
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
One practical example
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
The Reykjavik City Leisure Card
The Leisure Card initiative is to guarantee that all
children up to the age of 18 have the opportunity to
engage in leisure activities outside school.
The City of Reykjavik allocates approximately
EUR 3.000.000-, yearly to the Leisure Card
Influencing parents first and foremost
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Twofold goal
1. Humanitarian goal
• Less substance use
2. Financial goal
• Return on investment is multiple
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
And what is achieved?
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of students in 9th grade that participate insports in a sports club four times per week or more
23,0
34,0
42,0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2000 2006 2012
%
Increased organizedsports participation
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Percentage of students in 9th and 10th grade who spend time (often/almost always) with their parents
during weekdays
23,0
33,0
46,0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1997 2006 2012
%
Time spent with parents
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Proportion of students in 9th and 10th grade who have been out after 10 pm (3 times or more) in the
past week
53,0
40,0
29,0
-5
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
2000 2006 2012
%
Less late outside hours
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
My parents know where I am in the evenings (applies very or rather well to me) 9th and 10th
grade
52,0
67,071,0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2000 2006 2012
%
Increased parental monitoring
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
And substance use is going down
42
35
3233
2628
26
2225
18 19
149
7
5
23
1916
15 14 1412
11 12 1010
7
3
1715
12 11 12 13
9 9 97
66
3 3 20
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
%
Drunk last 30 days
Daily smoking
Hashish once or more
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
What about evaluation?
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Kristjansson et al. 2010, Preventive Medicine
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
To conclude
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
ADPY
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
Youth in Europe starts 2005
42
3532
33
2628
26
2223
1916
15 14 1412 11
1715
12 11 12 13
9 9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
%
Drunk last 30 days Daily smoking Hashish once or more
Substance use down by 50% in 8 years
15 – 16 year old who have become drunk past 30 days in some European cities 2013
5,4
8,69,8 10,3
12,2
15,3 16,1 16,8
19,2 19,7
24,2 24,2
28,0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
%
15 – 16 year old who have become drunk past 30 days in Reykjavik 2013 and 1998
5,4
8,69,8 10,3
12,2
15,3 16,1 16,819,2 19,7
23,024,2
28,0
42,0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
RVK 2013 RVK 1998
%
2013 ICSRA │ Reykjavik University
What is the commitment?
Thank youGothenburg│November 2013
2013 ICSRA │Reykjavik University