evaluation types goms and klm

23
Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM CS352

Upload: adanne

Post on 23-Feb-2016

61 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM. CS352. Announcements. Mid-term Tue of Week 5 Project presentations Your users (before mid-term) Next milestone of you project will be out later today or tomorrow (Prototypes) Reading 12.3 (evaluation methods), 15.4 (GOMS). Where we are in PRICPS :. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Evaluation TypesGOMS and KLM

CS352

Page 2: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Announcements

• Mid-term Tue of Week 5• Project presentations

– Your users (before mid-term)• Next milestone of you project will be out later

today or tomorrow (Prototypes)• Reading

– 12.3 (evaluation methods), 15.4 (GOMS)

2

Page 3: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Where we are in PRICPS:

• Predispositions: Did this in Project Proposal.

• RI: Research was studying users. Hopefully led to Insights.

• CP: Concept and initial (very low-fi) Prototypes due some time next week

• Evaluate throughout, repeat iteratively!!

Page 4: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Evaluation

• Analytical – based on your head• Empirical – based on data

– Formative • inFORMs design• what is (still) needed?

– Summative • did it work?

Page 5: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Analytical methods

• You follow established guidelines/procedures/models to decide (in your head) how good your design is.

• Examples:– GOMS/KLM – for skilled users, no errors.

• evaluating efficiency of regular use.– Heuristic Evaluation– Cognitive Walkthrough – for first-time users.

• evaluating ease of learning.

Page 6: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

GOMS (and KLM)

• GOMS: a family of models.• Predict user performance.• Useful for predicting actual time a user will

take in UI.• Useful for comparing different UIs.

Page 7: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

GOMS Constructs

• Goal, Operators, Methods, Selection rules• Goal: “what”. • Method: “how” steps (learned).• Operators: Cognitive processes + physical

actions to DO it.• Selection rules: rules saying which method

to select.

Page 8: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

GOMS example:Delete a word

• Goal: delete a word in a sentence.• Method #1: use the menu

– Recall that the word has to be highlighted.– Recall that the command is “cut”.– Recall that “cut” is in the Edit Menu.– Accomplish goal of selecting and executing

“cut”.– Return: goal accomplished.

Page 9: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

GOMS example (cont.)

• Method #2: use the delete key– Recall where to position cursor in relation to

word to be deleted.– Recall which key is delete key.– Press “delete” key to delete each letter.– Return: goal accomplished.

• Operators used in these methods– Click mouse, Drag cursor over text, Select

menu, Move cursor, Press KB key, Recall, ...

Page 10: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

GOMS example (cont.)

• Selection rules:– Use mouse/menu method (#1) if there’s a lot

of text to delete.– Else use “delete” key (method #2).

Page 11: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Applications of GOMS

• Various application and fields– Telephone operator workstation using CPM-

GOMS – CAD system for ergonomic design using

NGOMSL – Intelligent tutoring system using NGOMSL– Mouse driven text editor using KLM – Bank deposit reconciliation system using KLM– Space operations database system using

KLM

Page 12: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Telephone operator workstation using CPM-GOMS

• The task: a telephone company operator responding to customer requests for assistance.

Page 13: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Limitations of GOMS [Card et al. (1980) ]

• applied to skilled users, not to beginners or intermediates.

• doesn't account for either learning of the system or its recall after a period of disuse.

• doesn't account for errors. • does not address the amount and kind of fatigue• individual differences among users is not

accounted for in the model.

Page 14: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

KLM (a low-level variant of GOMS)

• Keystroke Level Model.• Simple, but accurate. Widely used.• Scope:

– skilled users– doing a task error-free.– using a specific method in a UI.

• CogTool has this built-in.

Page 15: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

KLM Operators

• User Operators:– K (keystroke), P (point), H (homing), D

(drawing), M (mental: think).– Times for each are provided to you

• based on extensive research/empirical data.• System Operator:

– R (respond).

Page 16: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

KLM/GOMS example 1:Open a file

• 27 ways to open a file in Windows!

• Methods as states +transitions.

• (High opgranularitycombineslow-level ops.)

Page 17: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

KLM/GOMS example 1 (cont.)

• Used to:– Understand cost

of each. – (break down

participants actual costs).

– “RL”:recent lists.– “WS/WX”:search.

• And to...

Page 18: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

KLM/GOMS example 1 (cont.)

• Use the breakdowns to compare costs to new UI alternative (new feature “FP”)

actual calc’d

Page 19: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Hick’s Law• GOMS’s “S” stands for “Selection”• Hick’s Law predicts the time to make a choice

between multiple choices, n is the # of choices:

Page 20: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

Fitts’ Law• Predicts that the time required to rapidly move to

a target area is a function of the distance to and the size of the target

Page 21: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

In practice…

• GOMS not used often• Fitts’ law often used for determining best

case for new kinds of input methods

Page 22: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

CogTool Example

• CogTool examples.– Calculating the cost of the task in this UI.– Comparing the cost if do the task with

different widgets.– Where are these cost differences coming

from?• under the hood to ACT/R

Page 23: Evaluation Types GOMS and KLM

What’s coming up next:

• Heuristic Evaluation• Cognitive Walkthroughs• Empirical Studies