evaluation of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ...€¦ · hanna-leena kelhälä et al....
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of SB204 4%
Once-Daily in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Acne Vulgaris
Treated Topically for Up to 52 WeeksA Hebert, J Del Rosso, M Rico, R Woolson, E de Leon, C Enloe, N Stasko
Presented by:
Adelaide A Hebert, MD
UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
2018 American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA
February 16 – 20, 2018
Disclosures
Allergan, Inc – I (Grants/Research Funding); Amgen – I (Grants/Research Funding), SP(H); AnacorPharmaceuticals, Inc – A(H); Astellas Pharma US, Inc. – I (Grants/Research Funding); Bayer – SP(H); Cassiopia - I (Grants/Research Funding); Celgene Corporation - (Grants/Research Funding); Chugai Pharma - (Grants/Research Funding); Cutanea Life Sciences - (Grants/Research Funding); Department of DFENCE – O (Grants/Research Funding); Dermavant Sciences – I (Grants/Research Funding); Dermira – A(H), I (Grants/Research Funding); Encore Dermatology, Inc – A(H); Galderma Laboratories, LP – A(H), SP(H); GlaxoSmithKline – A(H), Data Safety Monitoring Board (H), I (Grants/Research Funding); Healthpoint – I (Grants/Research Funding); Intendis, Inc. – SP(H); Mayne Pharma Group – I (Grants/Research Funding); Medimetriks Pharmaceuticals, Inc. – I (Grants/Research Funding); Menarini Group – SP(H); Menlo Therapeutics – A(H); Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC – I (Grants/Research Funding); NIH - (Grants/Research Funding); Novan – I (H); Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. – O(H); Onset Therapeutics – SP(H); Ortho Dermatologics – A(H); Pfizer Inc. – Speaker/Fucalty Education (H); Pharmaderm – A(H); PPD Inc – I (Grants/Research Funding); Prim-Med – SP(H); Promius Pharma, LLC – A(H); Promius Pharmaceuticals – A(H), I (Grants/Research Funding); Regeneron – Data Safety Monitoring Board (H); Roivant Sciences – A(H); Shionogi USA – A(IP); Sienna Biopharmaceuticals - (Grants/Research Funding); Sinclair Pharma –SP(H); Stiefel, a GSK company – A(H); TopMD – I (Grants/Research Funding); ; Valeant Pharmaceuticals International – A(H), SP(H); Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. – I (Grants/Research Funding);
2
Hanna-Leena Kelhälä et al. IL-17/Th17 Pathway is Activated in Acne Lesions. PLoS One. 2014;9(8): e105238.
Niedbala W et al. Regulation of Type 17 Helper T-Cell Function by Nitric Oxide During Inflammation Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(22):9220-9225.
Niedbala W et al. Nitric Oxide-Induced Regulatory T Cells Inhibit Th17 but Not Th1 Cell Differentiation and Function. J Immunol. 2013;191(1):164-170.
Qin M et al. Nitric Oxide Releasing Nanoparticles Prevent Propionibacterium Acnes Induced Inflammation by Both Clearing the Organism and Inhibiting Microbial
Stimulation of the Innate Immune Response J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(11):2723-2731.
P. acnes
Excess sebum
Inflammation
Hyper-keratinization
Keratinocyte
hyperproliferation
Bacterial colonization
(P. acnes)
Epidermis
Dermis
Hair
follicle
Sebocyte
hyperproliferation
IL-1, IL-17
Pathogenic Factors in Acne
NLRP3
Th17
TLR-2
IL-1R
P. acnes
bacteria
IL-17
IL-1β
X
T0
NO
XPro-IL-1β
Immunomodulatory and Antimicrobial
Activity of Nitric Oxide in Acne
Nitric oxide inhibits the NLRP3 inflammasome,
decreasing the downstream release of IL-1β and IL-17,
as well as kills P. acnes
Inflammatory
cell infiltration
Caspase
XX
Nitric Oxide and Acne
3
SB204 Study Objectives
SB204
Activating
Hydrogel
NVN1000
Alcohol Gel
SB204 is a nitric oxide-releasing topical drug candidate in
development for the treatment of acne vulgaris
SB204 4% gel has been evaluated in two replicate, multi-center,
randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled, parallel group trials with
>2600 patients with moderate-to-severe acne (NI-AC301 and NI-
AC302)
The following three co-primary endpoints were assessed in the two
studies:
the absolute change in inflammatory lesions
the absolute change in non-inflammatory lesions
the proportion of patients with IGA success defined as IGA=0 or 1
and at least a two grade change
Cutaneous tolerability and safety profile has been assessed in >3,200
patients dosed to date
4
SB204 Phase 3 Patient Disposition and Study Design
NI-AC301 Study NI-AC302 Study
Pooled N = 2637
Randomized
N = 1307
ITT Population
N = 1306
SB204 4%
N = 652
Vehicle
N = 654
Excluded
N = 1
Study drug not dispensed
Inclusion Criteria
Ages 9 and up
20 - 40 inflammatory lesions on the face
25 - 70 non-inflammatory lesions on the face
IGA “moderate = 3” or “severe = 4”
3 Co-Primary Endpoints at Week 12/ET
Absolute change in inflammatory lesion counts
Absolute change in non-inflammatory lesion counts
Proportion of IGA Success (“clear = 0” or “almost clear = 1” AND
≥ two grade change)
Treatment Regimen
SB204 4%: Vehicle = 1:1
Once daily application (QD)
12 week treatment
Randomized
N = 1330
ITT Population
N = 1327
SB204 4%
N = 663
Vehicle
N = 664
Excluded
N = 3
Study drug not dispensed
Pooled SB204 Vehicle
Discontinuation 164 (12.5%) 152 (11.5%)
Adverse event 22 (1.7%) 4 (0.3%)
Lack of efficacy 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.2%)
Subject request 57 (4.3%) 56 (4.2%)
Lost to follow-up 85 (6.5%) 90 (6.8%)
5
SB204 Phase 3 Pooled Demographics and Baseline Characteristics (ITT Population)
Pooled SB204
(N = 1315)
Vehicle
(N = 1318)
Age, years
Mean (SD) 21.3 (8.4) 21.6 (8.6)
Min to max 9 – 65 9 – 73
Gender
Male504
38.3%
514
39.0%
Female811
61.7%
804
61.0%
Lesion Counts at Baseline
Inflammatory, mean (SD) 27.4 (5.6) 27.5 (5.7)
Non-Inflammatory, mean (SD) 40.2 (12.5) 39.9 (12.4)
Baseline IGA Scores
“Moderate” or a score of 31156
88.0%
1162
88.2%
“Severe” or a score of 4158
12.0%
155
11.8%
6
-20.6
-33.2
-41.7
-50.3
-20.2
-31.4
-36.9
-44.1
-55
-45
-35
-25
-15
-5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
% C
ha
nge
fro
m B
ase
line
-15.8
-26.2
-34.8
-42.4
-14.7
-22.0
-28.3
-36.1
-55
-45
-35
-25
-15
-5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-17.8
-28.9
-37.6
-45.6
-17.0
-25.9
-31.8
-39.3
-55
-45
-35
-25
-15
-5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Inflammatory Lesions
Weeks
Non-Inflammatory Lesions
Weeks
Total Lesions
Weeks
SB204 Phase 3 Efficacy (ITT Population)
Percent Reduction in Lesions (Pooled)
Absolute change from baseline for pooled SB204 vs vehicle were: -12.48 vs -10.88 (p<0.001) for
inflammatory lesions, -15.06 vs -12.70 (p<0.001) for non-inflammatory lesions and -27.52 vs -23.75
(p<0.001) for total lesions.
7Standard error ≤1.2 for all data points presented
SB204 Phase 3 Efficacy (ITT Population)
Investigator Global Assessments (IGA)
Baseline to Week 12
Moderate & Severe at Baseline
2 Grade Change
Severe Only at Baseline
2 Grade Change
Moderate & Severe at Baseline
IGA = 0 or 1 & 2 Grade Change
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
301 302 Pooled 301 302 Pooled
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
301 302 Pooled 301 302 Pooled
p = 0.038
Response percentages were obtained after multiple imputation (MCMC) for missing data.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
301 302 Pooled 301 302 Pooled
663664 652654 1318 1315N = 663664 652654 1318 1315N = 6477 9478 155 158N =
Vehicle SB204 VehicleSB204Vehicle SB204
p = 0.003
p = 0.003
p = 0.002
p = 0.042
8
SB204 Phase 3 Representative Clinical Photos
Baseline Week 12
SB204 Treatment Group
9
69.1%
25.0%
5.5%
0.3%
74.3%
18.4%
4.3%
0.5%
79.6%
14.6%
2.4%
0.1%
79.5%
17.2%
3.3%
SB204 Phase 3 Pooled Tolerability
78.2%
19.5%
2.3%
80.8%
17.4%
1.5%
0.2%
83.9%
15.0%
1.0%
0.1%
84.2%
14.9%
0.7%
0.1%
Erythema
Burning / Stinging
SB204 Vehicle
Week 4 Week 12 Week 4 Week 12
Severe
Moderate
Mild
None
Week 4 Week 12 Week 4 Week 12
Severe
Moderate
Mild
None
SB204 Vehicle
Dryness
SB204 Vehicle
Severe
Moderate
Mild
None
Week 4 Week 12 Week 4 Week 12
82.1%
16.0%
1.7%
0.2%
87.6%
11.0%
0.9%
0.4%
87.6%
11.6%
0.7%
0.1%
90.0%
9.0%
0.8%
0.2%
10
SB204 Phase 3 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Population)
The most common TEAEs were application site reactions; less than 2% of patients
discontinued due to AEs. No treatment-related SAEs were reported.
NI-AC301
SB204
(N = 666)
NI-AC301
Vehicle gel
(N = 661)
NI-AC302
SB204
(N = 654)
NI-AC302
Vehicle gel
(N = 652)
Pooled
SB204
(N = 1320)
Pooled
Vehicle gel
(N = 1313)
General Disorders and
Administration-Site
Conditions
49 (7.5%) 12 (1.8%) 29 (4.4%) 11 (1.7%) 78 (5.9%) 23 (1.8%)
Application site pain 21 (3.2%) 3 (0.5%) 14 (2.1%) 4 (0.6%) 35 (2.7%) 7 (0.5%)
Application site erythema 11 (1.7%) 1 (0.2%) 10 (1.5%) 2 (0.3%) 21 (1.6%) 3 (0.2%)
Application site pruritus 16 (2.4%) 3 (0.5%) 6 (0.9%) 4 (0.6%) 22 (1.7%) 7 (0.5%)
Application site dryness 7 (1.1%) 2 (0.3%) 5 (0.8%) 1 (0.2%) 12 (0.9%) 3 (0.2%)
Other TEAEs
Nasopharyngitis 11 (1.7%) 10 (1.5%) 15 (2.3%) 18 (2.7%) 26 (2.0%) 28 (2.1%)
Headache 5 (0.8%) 1 (0.2%) 10 (1.5%) 1 (0.2%) 15 (1.1%) 2 (0.2%)
11
SB204 Long-Term Safety Design and Disposition
From AC-301
(total N = 1306)
N = 309
From AC-302
(total N = 1327)
N = 292
AC-303 (Open Label)
N = 601
SB204 experienced: 296
SB204 naïve: 305
Completed
N = 448
SB204 experienced: 232
SB204 naïve: 216
Treatment Regimen
SB204 4%
Once Daily Application (QD)
40 week treatment
Efficacy Endpoints
Change in inflammatory lesions
Change in non-inflammatory lesions
Tolerability and Safety
Primary Reason for Study Discontinuation
• Adverse events: 9
• Withdrawal by patients: 76
• Physician decision: 1
• Protocol violation: 1
• Lost to follow-up: 61
• Pregnancy: 2
• Other: 3 (non-compliance with taking study drug and
duplicate patients)
12
SB204 Long-Term Safety (Safety Population)
Overall
Other Events
Nasopharyngitis 19 (3.2%)
Headache 8 (1.3%)
Influenza 7 (1.2%)
Upper respiratory tract infection 6 (1.0%)
Bronchitis 3 (0.5%)
Migraine 3 (0.5%)
Nausea 3 (0.5%)
Tooth impacted 3 (0.5%)
Back pain 3 (0.5%)
Anxiety 3 (0.5%)
Cough 3 (0.5%)
Overall
N = 601
General Disorders and Administrative Site
Conditions26 (4.3%)
Application site dryness 9 (1.5%)
Application site pruritus 9 (1.5%)
Application site pain 6 (1.0%)
Application site erythema 4 (0.7%)
Application site exfoliation 3 (0.5%)
Application site pyrexia 3 (0.5%)
Any TEAE: n = 112 (18.6%)
Treatment-related TEAE: n = 23 (3.8%)
Discontinuation due to AE: n = 9 (1.5%) (1.3% - application site reactions)
No deaths
SAE: 6 patients (1%) (none of them were considered by the Investigator to be related to study treatment)
Two pregnancies: Early discontinuation (One delivered a healthy baby girl, no complications with the pregnancy.
One had a spontaneous abortion.)
13
-53.8
-74.5
-75
-65
-55
-45
-35
-25
-15
-5
0 10 20 30 40 50
% C
ha
nge
fro
m B
ase
line
-44.3
-70.5
-75
-65
-55
-45
-35
-25
-15
-5
0 10 20 30 40 50
-48.0
-72.0
-75
-65
-55
-45
-35
-25
-15
-5
0 10 20 30 40 50
Inflammatory Lesions
Weeks
Non-Inflammatory Lesions
Weeks
Total Lesions
Weeks
SB204 Long-Term Safety Efficacy (52 Weeks)
Percent Reduction in Lesions (SB204 Experienced Only)
Overall, a 75% reduction in inflammatory lesion counts was observed over 52 weeks of treatment,
showing a long-term benefit of continuous treatment with SB204.
14
0 2 4 8 12 16 24 36 48 52 0 2 4 8 12 16 24 36 48 52 0 2 4 8 12 16 24 36 48 52
Standard error ≤2.2 for all data points presented
Summary
In a pooled analysis from two Phase 3 trials (NI-AC301 and NI-AC302):
At Week 12, SB204 had statistically significant greater reduction over vehicle in:
inflammatory lesions (-50.3% vs -44.1%)
non-inflammatory lesions 12 (-42.4% vs -36.1%)
total lesions (-45.6% vs -39.3%)
Among patients in the severe group (IGA = 4), the percent of respondents with at least a 2 grade
improvement in IGA was approximately two times higher for SB204 than vehicle.
The most frequent adverse events were application site reactions, but mostly in the mild category.
Overall, less than 2% of patients discontinues due to AEs.
In the long-term safety study:
Continuous treatment with SB204 showed further benefit.
The 40 week safety profile was consistent with the 12 week trial. Application site reaction (4.3%) and
nasopharyngitis (3.2%) were the most frequent adverse events.
A separate study (NI-AC101) showed no measurable systemic exposure when treating 17% BSA of 18
patients with moderate-to-severe acne.
15
SB204 has shown evidence of efficacy in treating acne vulgaris with a favorable long-term
safety profile.