evaluation of maine’s dirigo health reform: initial experience and lessons for other states...
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation ofEvaluation ofMaine’s Dirigo Health Reform: Maine’s Dirigo Health Reform:
Initial Experience Initial Experience and Lessons for Other States and Lessons for Other States
Evaluation ofEvaluation ofMaine’s Dirigo Health Reform: Maine’s Dirigo Health Reform:
Initial Experience Initial Experience and Lessons for Other States and Lessons for Other States
February 1, 2008February 1, 2008
Debra J. Lipson and James M. VerdierMathematica Policy Research, Inc.
February 1, 2008February 1, 2008
Debra J. Lipson and James M. VerdierMathematica Policy Research, Inc.
2
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments Our co-authors
– Lynn Quincy, Shanna Shulman, Elizabeth Seif, Matt Sloan, Bob Hurley
Sponsors
– The Commonwealth Fund
– Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization (HCFO)—a national initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Our co-authors– Lynn Quincy, Shanna Shulman, Elizabeth Seif,
Matt Sloan, Bob Hurley
Sponsors
– The Commonwealth Fund
– Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization (HCFO)—a national initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
3
Overview of PresentationOverview of PresentationOverview of PresentationOverview of Presentation
Background on Dirigo Health ReformBackground on Dirigo Health Reform
Evaluation questions & study designEvaluation questions & study design
Major findingsMajor findings
Financing subsidies from savings in Financing subsidies from savings in overall health systemoverall health system
Lessons and conclusionsLessons and conclusions
Background on Dirigo Health ReformBackground on Dirigo Health Reform
Evaluation questions & study designEvaluation questions & study design
Major findingsMajor findings
Financing subsidies from savings in Financing subsidies from savings in overall health systemoverall health system
Lessons and conclusionsLessons and conclusions
4
Background on Dirigo Health Reform and Its Coverage Expansions
Background on Dirigo Health Reform and Its Coverage Expansions
5
Dirigo Health Reform GoalsDirigo Health Reform GoalsDirigo Health Reform GoalsDirigo Health Reform Goals
Make affordable health care coverage Make affordable health care coverage available to every Maine citizen by available to every Maine citizen by 2009 (about 140,000 uninsured in 2003)2009 (about 140,000 uninsured in 2003)
Slow the growth of health care costs Slow the growth of health care costs through cost containmentthrough cost containment
Improve quality of careImprove quality of care——for example, for example, by comparing provider performance by comparing provider performance using quality measuresusing quality measures
Make affordable health care coverage Make affordable health care coverage available to every Maine citizen by available to every Maine citizen by 2009 (about 140,000 uninsured in 2003)2009 (about 140,000 uninsured in 2003)
Slow the growth of health care costs Slow the growth of health care costs through cost containmentthrough cost containment
Improve quality of careImprove quality of care——for example, for example, by comparing provider performance by comparing provider performance using quality measuresusing quality measures
6
Dirigo Health Coverage Expansion Initiatives
Dirigo Health Coverage Expansion Initiatives
DirigoChoice – subsidized insurance product for small groups, self-employed, and individuals
Increased Medicaid eligibility for parents of dependent children – from prior max. of 150% FPL to 200% FPL
DirigoChoice – subsidized insurance product for small groups, self-employed, and individuals
Increased Medicaid eligibility for parents of dependent children – from prior max. of 150% FPL to 200% FPL
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
400%
Children Parents ChildlessAdults
Inco
me
as a
Per
cent
of F
PL
DirigoChoice (noteligible for subsidies)
DirigoChoiceSubsidy-Eligible
MaineCareExpansion-Eligible
Dual MaineCare/DirigoChoice Eligible
7
DirigoChoice FeaturesDirigoChoice Features
Individuals – could be previously insured
Small Firms:– 50 or fewer eligible employees– could have offered health benefits to employees
previously
Subsidies for premiums and deductibles for individuals with family income < 300% FPL
Comprehensive benefits – MH, preventive care, annual OOP cost limits
Jointly operated by state and private health plan
Individuals – could be previously insured
Small Firms:– 50 or fewer eligible employees– could have offered health benefits to employees
previously
Subsidies for premiums and deductibles for individuals with family income < 300% FPL
Comprehensive benefits – MH, preventive care, annual OOP cost limits
Jointly operated by state and private health plan
8
Illustrative Dirigo EnrolleeJohn, Age 56, Self-employed
Illustrative Dirigo EnrolleeJohn, Age 56, Self-employed
2006 annual income: $18,000
2007 DirigoChoice premium– Before subsidy: $857/mo.– With subsidy: $521/mo.
Major Surgery Costs: ~$80,000 John’s costs:
Deductible: $1,600Co-pays: $5,200
2006 annual income: $18,000
2007 DirigoChoice premium– Before subsidy: $857/mo.– With subsidy: $521/mo.
Major Surgery Costs: ~$80,000 John’s costs:
Deductible: $1,600Co-pays: $5,200
9
Evaluation Questions and Design
Evaluation Questions and Design
10
Research QuestionsResearch QuestionsResearch QuestionsResearch Questions
Are low-income uninsured people gaining coverage Are low-income uninsured people gaining coverage under DirigoChoice or Medicaid?under DirigoChoice or Medicaid?
How have small employers responded to the How have small employers responded to the availability of DirigoChoice? availability of DirigoChoice?
Are the DirigoChoice subsidy financing sources Are the DirigoChoice subsidy financing sources adequate and sustainable enough to cover many adequate and sustainable enough to cover many more low-income uninsured?more low-income uninsured?
Which aspects of Maine’s approach to health Which aspects of Maine’s approach to health coverage expansion are relevant elsewhere? What coverage expansion are relevant elsewhere? What can other states learn from its experience?can other states learn from its experience?
Are low-income uninsured people gaining coverage Are low-income uninsured people gaining coverage under DirigoChoice or Medicaid?under DirigoChoice or Medicaid?
How have small employers responded to the How have small employers responded to the availability of DirigoChoice? availability of DirigoChoice?
Are the DirigoChoice subsidy financing sources Are the DirigoChoice subsidy financing sources adequate and sustainable enough to cover many adequate and sustainable enough to cover many more low-income uninsured?more low-income uninsured?
Which aspects of Maine’s approach to health Which aspects of Maine’s approach to health coverage expansion are relevant elsewhere? What coverage expansion are relevant elsewhere? What can other states learn from its experience?can other states learn from its experience?
11
Study DesignStudy Design Qualitative & Quantitative Methods Qualitative & Quantitative Methods
Study DesignStudy Design Qualitative & Quantitative Methods Qualitative & Quantitative Methods
• Analysis of DirigoChoice & Medicaid administrative Analysis of DirigoChoice & Medicaid administrative data on enrolled firms and individualsdata on enrolled firms and individuals
Survey of small businesses in MaineSurvey of small businesses in Maine
Key stakeholder interviewsKey stakeholder interviews
Comparison of Maine to other states vis-a-vis: Comparison of Maine to other states vis-a-vis: – health insurance coveragehealth insurance coverage– small group and individual market regulationssmall group and individual market regulations– health care delivery systemhealth care delivery system– Medicaid policiesMedicaid policies
• Analysis of DirigoChoice & Medicaid administrative Analysis of DirigoChoice & Medicaid administrative data on enrolled firms and individualsdata on enrolled firms and individuals
Survey of small businesses in MaineSurvey of small businesses in Maine
Key stakeholder interviewsKey stakeholder interviews
Comparison of Maine to other states vis-a-vis: Comparison of Maine to other states vis-a-vis: – health insurance coveragehealth insurance coverage– small group and individual market regulationssmall group and individual market regulations– health care delivery systemhealth care delivery system– Medicaid policiesMedicaid policies
12
MAJOR FINDINGSMAJOR FINDINGS
13
Cumulative Net Enrollment in DirigoChoice,January 2005–September 2006
Cumulative Net Enrollment in DirigoChoice,January 2005–September 2006
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
J an-
05
Feb-
05
Mar-
05
Apr-
05
May-
05
J un-
05
J ul-
05
Aug-
05
Sep-
05
Oct-
05
Nov-
05
Dec-
05
J an-
06
Feb-
06
Mar-
06
Apr-
06
May-
06
J un-
06
J ul-
06
Aug-
06
Sep-
06
IndividualSole proprietorSmall group
Individual enrollment begins
Sole proprietor/Individual enrollment cap reached Sole proprietor/Individual
enrollment cap lifted
14
Enrollment in Dirigo HealthEnrollment in Dirigo HealthMedicaid Expansion GroupsMedicaid Expansion GroupsEnrollment in Dirigo HealthEnrollment in Dirigo Health
Medicaid Expansion GroupsMedicaid Expansion Groups
0
5000
10000
15000
30000
Sep-0
2
Nov-02
Jan-0
3
Mar
-03
May
-03
Jul-0
3
Sep-0
3
Nov-03
Jan-0
4
Mar
-04
May
-04
Jul-0
4
Sep-0
4
Nov-04
Jan-0
5
Mar
-05
May
-05
Jul-0
5
Sep-0
5
Nov-05
Jan-0
6
Mar
-06
May
-06
Jul-0
6
Sep-0
6
Nov-0
6
Date
Mo
nth
ly C
asel
oa
d
Childless Adults Medicaid Expansion to Parents
January 05: DirigoChoice began
March 05: Childless adult freeze instituted
July 06: Childless adult freeze lifted
2500025000
April 05: Parent Expansion (150-200%FPL)
2000020000
15
Previous Health Coverage Among DirigoChoice Members Enrolling in 2006
Previous Health Coverage Among DirigoChoice Members Enrolling in 2006
4%4%3%9%Responses not usable
31%28%30%37%Uninsured
65%68%67%54%Prior coverage
All Members
IndividualsSole
proprietorsSmall firm members
Source: MPR tabulation of Dirigo Health Agency Administrative Data
16
More Low-income Enrollees Qualified for Higher Subsidies than Expected
More Low-income Enrollees Qualified for Higher Subsidies than Expected
Income Level Projected Enrollment
Enrollees as of 9/06
Ever Enrolled as of 9/06
Medicaid-eligible 11% 1% 1%
<150% FPL 3 49 46150-199% FPL 6 16 16
200-249% FPL 29 10 11
250-299% FPL 26 4 5
> 300% FPL 24 20 22
Total 100 100 100
17
Fewer Small Firm Workers Enrolled in DirigoChoice Than Expected
Fewer Small Firm Workers Enrolled in DirigoChoice Than Expected
Projected Enrollment
Enrollment as of 9/06
Ever Enrolled as of 9/06
Small group members
90% 30% 35%
Sole proprietors
10%
28% 26%
Individuals 42% 38%
All members 100% 100% 100%
18
Small Employer SurveySmall Employer SurveyFirm Characteristics by Offer TypeFirm Characteristics by Offer Type
Small Employer SurveySmall Employer SurveyFirm Characteristics by Offer TypeFirm Characteristics by Offer Type
Average wage
12%*32%**17%18%Mean percent who earn more than $18 per hour
33%* 43%**39%38%
Mean percent who earn $12 to $18 per hour
55%**26%**45%44%Mean percent who earn less than $12 per hour
5.0**17.7**6.78.1Mean number of employees
143(18%)
121(16%)
509(66%)
773(100%)All firms
Coverage offered
None Another plan DirigoChoice All firmsFirm characteristics
*p < .05 ** or ++ p < .01
19
Average Change in Employer ContributionUnder DirigoChoice
Compared to Prior Coverage
Average Change in Employer ContributionUnder DirigoChoice
Compared to Prior Coverage
16%
33%
32%
20%
52%
47%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Premium
contribution
Annual
deductible Lower
Same
Higher
20
Why Firms That Considered Why Firms That Considered DirigoChoice Did Not Enroll DirigoChoice Did Not Enroll Why Firms That Considered Why Firms That Considered DirigoChoice Did Not Enroll DirigoChoice Did Not Enroll
Too costly or not affordable Too costly or not affordable
Benefits offered do not fit Benefits offered do not fit employees’ needsemployees’ needs
Did not qualify for DirigoChoiceDid not qualify for DirigoChoice
Other reasonsOther reasons
Too costly or not affordable Too costly or not affordable
Benefits offered do not fit Benefits offered do not fit employees’ needsemployees’ needs
Did not qualify for DirigoChoiceDid not qualify for DirigoChoice
Other reasonsOther reasons
45 (58%)45 (58%) 45 (58%)45 (58%)
19 (25%)19 (25%)
6 (8%)6 (8%)
8 (10%)8 (10%)
n = 78 of 773n = 78 of 773
21
DirigoChoice Subsidy Financing
and the
The Savings Offset Payment
DirigoChoice Subsidy Financing
and the
The Savings Offset Payment
22
DirigoChoice Financing Sources - 2006
DirigoChoice Financing Sources - 2006
SavingsOffset Payment
31%
DirigoChoiceMember Contribution
40%
State General Funds(carryover from 2005)
29%
Sources: 2007 Dirigo Health Agency allocation request to the Maine legislature;Dirigo Health Agency, 2006, Annual Report: Program Overview 2005 & 2006.
23
Savings Offset PaymentSavings Offset Payment
SOP assessments on insurers and 3rd-party administrators equal to estimated “aggregate measurable cost savings”
Potential Savings Sources– Fewer uninsured due to Dirigo Health expansions,
leading to reduction in bad debt/charity care
– Hospital savings from voluntary cost controls
– CON and capital fund savings from lower capital investments
– “Provider fee savings”: less cost shifting to other payers due to increased Medicaid provider rates
SOP assessments on insurers and 3rd-party administrators equal to estimated “aggregate measurable cost savings”
Potential Savings Sources– Fewer uninsured due to Dirigo Health expansions,
leading to reduction in bad debt/charity care
– Hospital savings from voluntary cost controls
– CON and capital fund savings from lower capital investments
– “Provider fee savings”: less cost shifting to other payers due to increased Medicaid provider rates
24
Savings Offset Payment IssuesSavings Offset Payment Issues
Type of savings to count
Assumptions, data and methods used to estimate savings
Method for capturing provider savings– Insurers expected to recover SOP by reducing Insurers expected to recover SOP by reducing
provider payments and passing on savings to provider payments and passing on savings to consumers via lower premiums, but did notconsumers via lower premiums, but did not
Insurers & employers filed legal challenge to SOP
Type of savings to count
Assumptions, data and methods used to estimate savings
Method for capturing provider savings– Insurers expected to recover SOP by reducing Insurers expected to recover SOP by reducing
provider payments and passing on savings to provider payments and passing on savings to consumers via lower premiums, but did notconsumers via lower premiums, but did not
Insurers & employers filed legal challenge to SOP
25
Estimated v. Actual Savings2006-2008
Estimated v. Actual Savings2006-2008
Dirigo Health Board Estimate
Approved by Insurance Superintendent
2006 $110.6 M $43.7 M
2007 $41.8 M $34.3 M
2008 $78.1 M $32.8 M
26
Lessons and ConclusionsLessons and Conclusions
27
Financing Coverage ExpansionsFinancing Coverage Expansions
Financing insurance subsidies for low- and middle-income people from savings in the private health system is vulnerable to opposition from those expected to pay for subsidies– Capturing cost savings from reduced bad
debt/charity care and other cost containment efforts can be just as hard as raising taxes
Medicaid eligibility expansions can be effective in increasing coverage, but may be politically controversial in many states– Issues of budget cost, income levels covered,
“crowd out” of private insurance
Financing insurance subsidies for low- and middle-income people from savings in the private health system is vulnerable to opposition from those expected to pay for subsidies– Capturing cost savings from reduced bad
debt/charity care and other cost containment efforts can be just as hard as raising taxes
Medicaid eligibility expansions can be effective in increasing coverage, but may be politically controversial in many states– Issues of budget cost, income levels covered,
“crowd out” of private insurance
28
Program Design and ImplementationProgram Design and Implementation
Incremental, voluntary coverage programs can help offset premium costs and raise health coverage rates -- but unlikely to achieve universal coverage
Inevitable trade-off between scope of benefits and affordability of premiums
Maintaining or expanding small employer offer rate is hard in high-cost states
Incremental, voluntary coverage programs can help offset premium costs and raise health coverage rates -- but unlikely to achieve universal coverage
Inevitable trade-off between scope of benefits and affordability of premiums
Maintaining or expanding small employer offer rate is hard in high-cost states
29
Relationships with Private Health Insurance Plans
Relationships with Private Health Insurance Plans
Using competition among health plans to lower price not an option in some states– May not be enough plans
State-sponsored plans that co-exist, or compete, with private plans:– Risk adverse selection if benefits are
better– Have limited potential to raise insurance
rates or attract firms & individuals, if benefits are lower and enrollment is voluntary
Using competition among health plans to lower price not an option in some states– May not be enough plans
State-sponsored plans that co-exist, or compete, with private plans:– Risk adverse selection if benefits are
better– Have limited potential to raise insurance
rates or attract firms & individuals, if benefits are lower and enrollment is voluntary
30
Caveats & LimitationsCaveats & Limitations
Data Limitations
– Annual CPS data for Maine are too imprecise to measure declines in uninsured at state level
– No state household survey since 2002
Evolution of Dirigo Health Coverage Reforms
– Changes to DirigoChoice benefits, administration, marketing
– Impact of Dirigo cost containment and quality improvement initiatives not yet known
Data Limitations
– Annual CPS data for Maine are too imprecise to measure declines in uninsured at state level
– No state household survey since 2002
Evolution of Dirigo Health Coverage Reforms
– Changes to DirigoChoice benefits, administration, marketing
– Impact of Dirigo cost containment and quality improvement initiatives not yet known