evaluation of lng tank suitability of complex concentrated
TRANSCRIPT
Department of Materials Science and Engineering,Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
ESPark Research Group e-mail : [email protected] : http://espark.snu.ac.kr
Evaluation of LNG tank suitability of
Complex concentrated Alloys through
“Thermal Distribution Analysis”
Current Status of Structural Materials
2020.06.29
Jeong-Won Yeh, Sanghun Son
2ESPark Research Group
Introduction of LNG tank
Liquefied Gas Carrier always keep the cryogenic temperature
• basic theories including science about heat transfer
• applied LNG carrier (IMO-Type C Tank) in practice.
Brittle fracture of LNG tnak
detailed study about thermal distribution of hull is needed
3ESPark Research Group
Utilization of CCAs on thermal insulation
• Strong & Ductile
• Thermally stable
• Low conductivity
• Highly formable
from cryogenic to elevated T
• Low thermal expansion coefficient
LNG tank materials
CCA structure
∆𝑆𝑆𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐. = 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅(𝑅𝑅)𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏 𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐 𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒆𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒆𝒆𝒆 ↑ ↔ 𝒄𝒄𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒏𝒐𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒄𝒄𝒆𝒆𝒄𝒄𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒏𝒄𝒄𝒆𝒆 𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒆𝒏𝒏𝒐𝒐𝒆𝒆𝒆𝒆 ↑
∆𝑮𝑮𝒄𝒄𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒏𝒐𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄. = ∆𝑯𝑯𝒄𝒄𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒏𝒐𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄. − 𝑻𝑻∆𝑺𝑺𝒄𝒄𝒐𝒐𝒏𝒏𝒐𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄.
4ESPark Research Group
Utilization of CCAs on thermal insulation
• Strong & Ductile
• Thermally stable
• Low conductivity
• Highly formable
from cryogenic to elevated T
• Low thermal expansion coefficient
LNG tank materials
(1) Thermodynamics : high entropy effect
(2) Kinetics : sluggish diffusion effect
(3) Structure : severe lattice distortion effect
(4) Property : cocktail effect
(3) Structure : severe lattice distortion effect
Distorted lattice of HEA can hinder thermal conduction effectively
Fracture toughness & yield strength – CrMnFeCoNi
5ESPark Research Group
Thermally insulative metallic materials : HEA
Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 061906 (2016)
CCA is one of the most thermal-insulative materials among metals
Low
𝜿𝜿
6ESPark Research Group
Contents
1. Basics of Heat Transfer
2. Thermal resistance concept for tank
3. Relationship between configuration entropy and Thermal properties
5. Conclusion
• Thermal conductivity • Thermal expansion coefficient
4. Thermal Distribution Analysis
7ESPark Research Group
Basics of Heat Transfer
1. What is heat transfer?Some kind of energy that can be transferred from one systemto another as a results of temperature difference.
2. The law of heat transfer (Thermodynamics)1) Conservation of Energy
(Energy Balance for System)(No work, Just stored energy)
Energy required to raise the temperature of unit mass by 1℃
2) Heat be transferred in the direction of decreasing temperature.
8ESPark Research Group
Basics of Heat Transfer
3. Heat transfer Mechanisms1) Conduction
Transfer of energy from the more energetic particles to theadjacent less energetic ones as a result of interactions betweenthe particles
2) ConvectionMode of energy transfer between a solid surface and adjacent
liquid or gas that is in motion
3) RadiationEnergy emitted by matter in the form of electromagnetic waves
9ESPark Research Group
Thermal resistance concept for tank
1. Conduction resistance
2. Convection resistance
3. Radiation and combined resistance
The convection and radiationresistances are parallel to each other
hcombined = hconv + hrad
10ESPark Research Group
Thermal resistance concept for tank
4. Thermal resistance network
Rate ofheat convection or radiation
into the wall
Rate of= heat conduction =
through the wall
Rate ofheat convection or radiation
from the wall
We need this value.
11ESPark Research Group
CCA design with similar σy and different deformation mechanism
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Gib
bs fr
ee e
nerg
y (H
CP-F
CC) (
J)
Mn contents(%)8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Gib
bs fr
ee e
nerg
y (H
CP-
FCC
) (J)
Ni contents(%)14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Gib
bs fr
ee e
nerg
y (H
CP-
FCC
) (J)
Co contents(%)18 20 22 24 26 28 30
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Gib
bs fr
ee e
nerg
y (H
CP-
FCC
) (J)
Fe contents(%)
CoMn FeCr Ni20 20 20 20 20
Mn Ni Fe Co
By Lowering ∆Gγ→ε , deformation mechanism can be changed
# Composition ∆G(hcp-fcc)(J) Deformation mechanism Note
1 Cr20Mn20Fe20Co20Ni20 1927.8 Dislocation gliding Cantor
2 Cr20Mn14Fe24Co24Ni16 771.0 Twinning TWIP
3 Cr20Mn10Fe30Co30Ni10 245.3 Phase transformation TRIP
4 Cr20Mn8Fe32Co32Ni8 59.4 Phase transformation TADP
12ESPark Research Group
Tendency of thermal conductivity
Temp ↑Collision frequency ↑
Scattering free electron ↑Thermal diffusivity ↓
What tendency does thermal conductivity show as ∆Smix increases in 5 component system?
1, 2, 3 component system: Temp↑, κ↓ 4, 5 component system: Temp↑, κ ↑
Temp ↑Energy of free electron ↑
13ESPark Research Group
Configuration entropy of CCAs
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
TADPTRIPTWIP
Co
nfig
urat
ion
entro
py
Cantor
∆Smix = -Rln(xCrlnxCr + xMnlnxMn + xFelnxFe + xColnxCo + xNilnxNi)∆Smix: Configuration entropyR: gas constantxx: mole fraction
14ESPark Research Group
Sample preparation for Thermal diffusivity test
Cantor TWIP TRIP TADP
Thermal diffusivity specimen
Laser Flash Method
15ESPark Research Group
Thermal diffusivity of CCAs
50 100 150 200 250 3000
3
6
9
12
Cantor TWIP TRIP TADP
Ther
mal
diffu
sivity
(mm
2 /s)
Temperature(oC)
α = 𝟎𝟎.𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏 � 𝒅𝒅𝟐𝟐
𝒆𝒆𝟏𝟏/𝟐𝟐
Temperature Signal VersusTime
Laser Pulse
α: Thermal diffusivityd: thickness of the samplet1/2: time to the half maximum in s
• Energy heats the sample on the bottom side and detector detects the
temperature signal versus time on the top side
• In 5 component system, Thermal diffusivity tends to increase as the
temperature increases
16ESPark Research Group
Thermal conductivity in room temperature
κ = α * specific heat * Densityκ: Thermal conductivityα: Thermal diffusivity
12.0 12.3 12.6 12.9 13.2 13.5
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
Ther
mal
cond
uctiv
ity
∆Smix
Cantor
TWIP
TRIP
TADPκ ∆Smix
Cantor 0.01133 13.38087
TWIP 0.01326 13.0769
TRIP 0.01436 12.51081
TADP 0.01828 12.09888
Thermal diffusivity decreases when Configuration entropy increases
17ESPark Research Group
Sample preparation for Thermal expansion coefficient test
Cantor TWIP TRIP TADP
Thermal expansion coefficient specimen
Thermomechanical Analyzer (TMA)
18ESPark Research Group
Thermal expansion of CCAs
50 100 150 200 250 3000
1
2
3
4
5
dL/L
(mm
/mm
)
Temperature (°C)
Cantor TWIP TRIP TADP
CTLE = 𝟏𝟏𝑳𝑳𝟎𝟎
𝒅𝒅𝑳𝑳𝒅𝒅𝑻𝑻
CTLE: Coefficient of linear thermal expansion
L0: initial length 2.5 mm
5 m
m
• Linear thermal expansion is used to determine the rate and which a material
expands as a function of temperature.
19ESPark Research Group
12.0 12.3 12.6 12.9 13.2 13.517.6
17.8
18.0
18.2
18.4
18.6
Ther
mal
expa
nsio
n co
effic
ient
∆Smix
Thermal expansion coefficient in room temperature
Thermal diffusivity increases when Configuration entropy increases
Cantor
TWIP
TRIP
TADP
CTLE ∆Smix
Cantor 18.56 13.38087
TWIP 17.97 13.0769
TRIP 17.78 12.51081
TADP 17.69 12.09888
20ESPark Research Group
trade-off tendency between “Thermal conductivity” vs “Thermal expansion coefficient”
17.6
17.8
18.0
18.2
18.4
18.6
18.8 Thermal expansion coefficient
TADPTWIP TRIP
Ther
mal
expa
nsio
n(pp
m/K
)
Cantor0.010
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.020
Thermal conductivity
Ther
mal
cond
uctiv
ity(W
/mm
)
Single phase Multi phase
CCA have trade-off tendency of “Thermal conductivity” vs “Thermal expansion coefficient”
Low Thermal conductivityHigh Thermal expansion coefficient
High Thermal conductivityLow Thermal expansion coefficient
21ESPark Research Group
Numerical Solution
1. Why 3D FEA Solution needed?• The analytical 2D calculation using heat equilibrium equation can solve only
one direction of heat transfer. • So, 3D FEA is needed to check considering 3-dimensional analysis.
2. FEA Tools• Solver: ABAQUS
22ESPark Research Group
Numerical 3D Solution (FEA)
5 ℃
AIR(Boundary Condition)
0 ℃
SEA WATER(Boundary Condition)
*-139.7 ℃
LNG(Boundary Condition)
Ship Side Shell
LNG Tank
Water Draft (m)
Ship Internal structure
*Start temperature is considered with the convection of the internal gas
3. Boundary condition
23ESPark Research Group
Numerical 3D Solution (FEA)
<Ship Model - Whole> <Ship Model - Internal View>
<LNG Tank Model - Whole> <LNG Tank Model - Internal View>
9%Ni Steelor
CCAs
Insulation
◎ Tank Size : 30K CBM◎ Thermal Conductivity• 9%Ni : 0.029 W/mm• CCAs : 0.018W/mm
4. 3D modeling (Input Tools : Hyper-Mesh)
24ESPark Research Group
Numerical 3D Solution (FEA)
LNG Tank9%Ni Temperature : -139.7 ℃
LNG TankCCAs Temperature : -139.7 ℃
5. Results: LNG Tank
25ESPark Research Group
Numerical 3D Solution (FEA)
Ship Structure9%Ni Temperature : -2.14 ℃
Ship StructureCCAs Temperature : 1.85 ℃
5. Results: Ship structure
26ESPark Research Group
Conclusion
The challenge of LNG1. While the tanks on an LNG carrier are designed to stay cool, they cannot provide perfect
insulation against warming. Heat slowly affects the tanks, which can cause the LNGinside to evaporate and produces a substance known as boil-off gas (BOG).
2. Natural gas remains liquefied by staying at a consistent pressure, but when boil-offoccurs and it returns to gas, the larger volume of gas will increase the tank pressure.
3. While the tanks are designed to handle the rise over short distances, prolonged pressureincreases cannot be managed effectively and require alternative solutions.
Handling the pressureIf we controlled the low temperature against warming, we can keep a consistent pressureand control boil-off gas.
27ESPark Research Group
Conclusion
From this study, it can be mentioned that CCAs’ conductivity is lower than the 9%Ni steel’s conductivity then maintaining and storing LNG at a stable temperature can be managed effectively in the LNG tank applied with CCAs.
CCA have trade-off tendency of “Thermal conductivity” vs “Thermal
expansion coefficient”
Thank you for your kind attention
29ESPark Research Group
Mechanical property of CCAs
Cantor TWIP TRIP TADP
Yield stress(MPa) 307 279 291 300
Ultimate stress(MPa) 679 699 798 870
Uniform elongation 0.32 0.45 0.46 0.42
*TADP: TRIP-assisted dual phase
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.80
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Cantor TWIP TRIP TADP
True
stre
ss(σ
)
True strain(ε)