evaluation of lh e c ring-ring installation issues

12
EVALUATION OF LHeC RING-RING INSTALLATION ISSUES LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 1 Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT Discussions with: Helmut Burkhardt Miriam Fitterer Max Klein Karl-Hubert Mess Yvon Muttoni John-Andrew Osborne Stefan Roesler Many thanks to all

Upload: celina

Post on 23-Feb-2016

117 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Discussions with : Helmut Burkhardt Miriam Fitterer Max Klein Karl-Hubert Mess Yvon Muttoni John-Andrew Osborne Stefan Roesler Many thanks to all . Evaluation of LH e C Ring-ring Installation Issues . Overview. Ring-Ring Geometry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

EVALUATION OF LHeC RING-RING

INSTALLATION ISSUES

LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 1Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT

Discussions with:Helmut BurkhardtMiriam FittererMax KleinKarl-Hubert MessYvon MuttoniJohn-Andrew OsborneStefan Roesler

Many thanks to all

Page 2: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Overview

Ring-Ring Geometry Junction of the e-ring by-passes

with LHC tunnel Integration challenges Machine protection Installation schedule

LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 2

Page 3: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 3LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012

Geometry of the LHeC Ring-Ring option

Two by-passes foreseen in the CDR

ATLAS

CMS

Need to consider a 3rd by-pass

LHCb

Page 4: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 4LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012

LHeC Ring-Ring Geometry: compensation for additional by-pass lengths

e beam offset of 61cm / LHC mean axis

3rd by-pass length compensationwould move the beam ~30cm further into the transport reserved area

Space originally allocated to a future e ring

Page 5: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Geometry of the LHeC Ring-Ring option

Compensation of the by-passes lengths brings the e-ring into the LHC transport area;

Sliding supports required to move out the e-ring will be very delicate (precision, stability);

Integration in the existing installation has to cope with all intermediate positions;

Need to separate elements or synchronize movements along un-interrupted sections.

There is a strong incentive to review the requirement of equal lengths of the proton and electron rings

LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 5

Page 6: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 6LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012

Junction of the e-ring by-passes with LHC tunnel

The bending radius of the LHC dipoles is 2804 m an electron beam going straight needs 75 m to move

1 m sideway from the proton trajectory

Page 7: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Junction of the e-ring by-passes with LHC tunnel

LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 7

LHC main tunnelInjection line at Point 8

Thickness of separation wall is about 1 m

Page 8: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Integration challenges

LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 8Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT

Page 9: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Integration challenges and

Machine protection Access to equipment for maintenance and repair

has to be maintained; Many areas will be highly activated as LHC

luminosity increase: Interventions need to be optimized to keep workers expositions below acceptable threshold;

LHC beam loss monitors will be sensitive to synchrotron radiation from the e-beam: Shielding of monitors means extra space, extra material activated and also extra difficulties/time for interventions.

LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 9

Page 10: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Installation schedule:Interference with LHC operation

CE for new shafts and klystron galleries can probably proceed while LHC is running;

However, it is not the case of the by-passes: we need 7m of earth to shield a working area from an accidental LHC beam loss;

Need to dismount LHC in the junction areas to be digged: The cryo-magnets would be disconnected and stored on surface, The cryo-line would also be dismounted, All services have to be removed, The CE work-site has to be sealed for dust, but ventilation must

be maintained in the LHC to control temperature/dew point. Assume ~6 months before CE can start in the junction areas

LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 10

Page 11: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Installation schedule:Interference with LHC operation

CE to complete the first junction areas (digging, water-proofing, concreting) would take ~6 months;

The completion of the 3 by-passes (1km each) and of the 6 junction areas would take another year (see John Osborne)

The installation of services for the e-ring can be evaluated to last 2 years (LEP and LHC experience), out of which 1 year overlaps with civil engineering;

The installation of the e-ring elements would also take 2 years, out of which half could overlap with the services: ~1 year of installation on the critical path the re-installation and commissioning of LHC could occur in // (managing of co-activities will be challenging)

LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 11

Page 12: Evaluation  of  LH e C  Ring-ring Installation  Issues

Summary

The LHeC CDR is very complete and adresses most of the issues presented

The complete integration study will be challenging: Number of by-passes must be reviewed Constraints on e-ring circumferences must be clarified Interventions must be optimized in light of RP requirements

The installation of the e-ring in the LHC tunnel will have a strong impact on the LHC operation

LHeC Workshop 14-15 June 2012 Sylvain Weisz - CERN/DG-DI-DAT 12