evaluation

17
HUL 291: Electronic Governance P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan MS 624 | [email protected] Vignesh 1

Upload: akshat-goel

Post on 22-Jun-2015

281 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation

HUL 291: Electronic Governance

P. Vigneswara IlavarasanMS 624 | [email protected]

Vignesh 1

Page 2: Evaluation

Framework

• Evaluation• A framework• Case of NMDC• Reference

Vignesh 2

Page 3: Evaluation

Evaluation

• Quantitative and qualitative approaches–Hard Vs Soft–Differing assumptions & required skill sets

• egov systems has both components• evaluation should include both.. • Evolving frameworks

Vignesh 3

Page 4: Evaluation

Suggested components

• Hard measures• Soft measures• Hierarchy of measures

Vignesh 4

Page 5: Evaluation

Hard measures• Cost – benefit analysis

– Benefits measurement problems– Factors are not exhaustive– Accounting procedures inadequate  nature of organizations / service organizations

• Benchmarks – Metric benchmarking from abroad inapplicable due to nascent stages

– grading of IT infrastructure• Info abt a topic in website; link to relevant contact, downlodable forms, online transactions

Vignesh 5

Page 6: Evaluation

Soft measures• Scoring Method

–Weighted average of selected attributes– Includes both tangible and intangible benefits

• Stages of egov– figure

• Sociological –Opinion gathering abt employees adaptability

Vignesh 6

Page 7: Evaluation

Hierarchy of measures• Mix of soft and hard measures, but in a sequence– Figure

• Flexible – context specific measurement

Vignesh 7

Page 8: Evaluation

NDMC• Colonial legacy• Like a mini‐government – supplies electricity, water

• Budget comes from central govt & own revenues / cash rich

• use of IT in internal gov by 2001~ INR 20 m

Vignesh 8

Page 9: Evaluation

Evaluation

• Study was done in 2003 by IITD researchers• Benchmark – fig

– poor performance when compared ‐ fig

• Scoring method – fig– Comparisons not available

• Stages of e‐government – fig

Vignesh 9

Page 10: Evaluation

Eval…cont..

• Sociological angle– Moving from bureaucratic structure, linked with other units, flexible, increased accountability

– Computer training to the workers, initial resistance, awareness education

– Expected gradual change

• Measurement hierarchy• See table 5 /

Vignesh 10

Page 11: Evaluation

Reference

• Gupta, M. P. and D. Jana. (2003). E‐government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 365‐387.  

• Emailed. 

Vignesh 11

Page 12: Evaluation

• Thank you!

ClarificationsQuestions

Comments

Vignesh 12

Page 13: Evaluation

Stages -- --

Vignesh 13Layne & Lee, 2001

Page 14: Evaluation

Hierarchy -- --

Vignesh 14

Page 15: Evaluation

Benchmark --

Vignesh 15

Page 16: Evaluation

Comparison --

Vignesh 16

Page 17: Evaluation

Score card --

Vignesh 17