evaluating web pages: techniques to apply & questions to ask internet/evaluate.html

21
Evaluating Web Pages: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask Questions to Ask http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/ Evaluate.html

Upload: shanon-randall

Post on 31-Dec-2015

236 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Evaluating Web Pages: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply &Techniques to Apply &

Questions to AskQuestions to Ask

http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html

Page 2: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Evaluating web pages skillfully requires you Evaluating web pages skillfully requires you to do two things at once:to do two things at once:

Train your eye and your fingers to employ a Train your eye and your fingers to employ a series of series of techniquestechniques that help you quickly find that help you quickly find what you need to know about web pages; what you need to know about web pages;

Train your mind to think critically, even Train your mind to think critically, even suspiciously, by suspiciously, by asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions that will help you decide how much a web page that will help you decide how much a web page is to be trusted. is to be trusted.

Page 3: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

What can the URL tell you? What can the URL tell you? Techniques for Web EvaluationTechniques for Web Evaluation : :

1. Before you leave the list of search results -- 1. Before you leave the list of search results -- before you click and get interested in anything before you click and get interested in anything written on the page -- glean all you can from written on the page -- glean all you can from the URLs of each page. the URLs of each page.

2. Then choose pages most likely to be 2. Then choose pages most likely to be reliable and authentic. reliable and authentic.

asking a series of questions

Page 4: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

1. What can the URL tell you? 1. What can the URL tell you? Is it somebody's Is it somebody's personal pagepersonal page??

Look for a personal name (e.g., jbarker or barker) following a tilde ( ~ ), a percent

sign ( % ), or the words "users," "members," or "people."

Is the server a commercial ISP* or other provider mostly of web page hosting

(like aol.com or geocities.com

asking a series of questions

Page 5: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Is the domain appropriate for the content? Is the domain appropriate for the content? Government sites: look for .gov, .mil, .us, or Government sites: look for .gov, .mil, .us, or

other country code other country code Educational sites: look for .edu Educational sites: look for .edu Nonprofit organizations: look for .org Nonprofit organizations: look for .org

If from a foreign country, look at the If from a foreign country, look at the country code and read the page to be sure country code and read the page to be sure who published it. who published it.

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

What type of domain does it come from ?

Page 6: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Is it published by an entity that makes Is it published by an entity that makes sense?sense? Who "published" the page? Who "published" the page?

In general, the publisher is the agency or person In general, the publisher is the agency or person operating the "server" computer from which the operating the "server" computer from which the document is issued. document is issued. The server is usually named in first portion of the URL The server is usually named in first portion of the URL

(between (between http://http:// and the first and the first //) ) Have you heard of this entity before? Have you heard of this entity before? Does it correspond the name of the site? Should Does it correspond the name of the site? Should

it? it?

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Page 7: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

2. Scan the perimeter of the 2. Scan the perimeter of the page, looking for answers to page, looking for answers to

these questions:these questions: TechniquesTechniques : : 1. Look for links that say "About us," 1. Look for links that say "About us,"

"Philosophy," "Background," "Biography," "Who "Philosophy," "Background," "Biography," "Who am I," etc. am I," etc.

2. If you cannot find any links like these, you can 2. If you cannot find any links like these, you can often find this kind of information if you Truncate often find this kind of information if you Truncate back the URL. back the URL.

3. Look for the date "last updated" - usually at 3. Look for the date "last updated" - usually at the bottom of a web page. the bottom of a web page.

Page 8: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Who wrote the page? Who wrote the page? Look for the name of the author, or the name of Look for the name of the author, or the name of

the organization, institution, agency, or whatever the organization, institution, agency, or whatever who is responsible for the page who is responsible for the page An e-mail contact is not enough An e-mail contact is not enough

If there is no personal author, look for an agency If there is no personal author, look for an agency or organization that claims responsibility for the or organization that claims responsibility for the page. page. If you cannot find this, locate the publisher by If you cannot find this, locate the publisher by

truncating back the URL (see technique above). Does truncating back the URL (see technique above). Does this publisher claim responsibility for the content? this publisher claim responsibility for the content? Does it explain why the page exists in any way?Does it explain why the page exists in any way?

Page 9: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Is the page dated? Is it current Is the page dated? Is it current enough? enough?

Is it "stale" or "dusty" information on a Is it "stale" or "dusty" information on a time-sensitive or evolving topic? time-sensitive or evolving topic?

CAUTION:CAUTION: Undated factual or statistical Undated factual or statistical information is no better than anonymous information is no better than anonymous information. Don't use it.information. Don't use it.

Page 10: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

What are the author's credentials on this What are the author's credentials on this subject? subject?

Does the purported background or education look like Does the purported background or education look like someone who is qualified to write on this topic? someone who is qualified to write on this topic?

Might the page be by a hobbyist, self-proclaimed expert, Might the page be by a hobbyist, self-proclaimed expert, or enthusiast? or enthusiast? Is the page merely an opinion? Is there any reason you should Is the page merely an opinion? Is there any reason you should

believe its content more than any other page? believe its content more than any other page? Is the page a rant, an extreme view, possibly distorted or Is the page a rant, an extreme view, possibly distorted or

exaggerated? exaggerated?

If you cannot find strong, relevant credentials, look very If you cannot find strong, relevant credentials, look very closely at documentation of sources (next section). closely at documentation of sources (next section).

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Page 11: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

3. Look for indicators of quality 3. Look for indicators of quality information:information:

Techniques: Techniques: 1. Look for a link called1. Look for a link called "links," "additional sites," "related "links," "additional sites," "related

linkslinks,,"" etc. etc. 2. In the text, if you see footnote numbers or links that might refer to 2. In the text, if you see footnote numbers or links that might refer to

documentation, take the time to explore them. documentation, take the time to explore them. What kinds of publications or sites are they? Reputable? What kinds of publications or sites are they? Reputable?

Scholarly? Scholarly? Are they real? On the web, it is possible to create totally fake Are they real? On the web, it is possible to create totally fake

references. references. 3. Look at the publisher of the page (first part of the URL). 3. Look at the publisher of the page (first part of the URL).

Expect a journal article, newspaper article, and some other Expect a journal article, newspaper article, and some other publications that are recent to come from the original publisher publications that are recent to come from the original publisher IF the publication is available on the web. IF the publication is available on the web.

Look at the bottom of such articles for copyright information or Look at the bottom of such articles for copyright information or permissions to reproduce. permissions to reproduce.

Page 12: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Are sources documented with Are sources documented with footnotes or links?footnotes or links?

Where did the author get the information? Where did the author get the information? As in published scholarly/academic journals As in published scholarly/academic journals

and books, you should expect documentation. and books, you should expect documentation. If there are links to other pages as sources, If there are links to other pages as sources,

are they to reliable sources? are they to reliable sources? Do the links work? Do the links work?

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Page 13: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

If reproduced information, is it If reproduced information, is it complete, not altered, not fake or complete, not altered, not fake or

forged?forged? Is it retyped? If so, it could easily be altered. Is it retyped? If so, it could easily be altered. Is it reproduced from another publication? Is it reproduced from another publication?

Are permissions to reproduce and copyright Are permissions to reproduce and copyright information provided? information provided?

Is there a reason there are not links to the Is there a reason there are not links to the original source if it is online (instead of original source if it is online (instead of reproducing it)? reproducing it)?

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Page 14: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Are there links to other Are there links to other resources on the topic?resources on the topic?

Are the links well chosen, well organized, and/or Are the links well chosen, well organized, and/or evaluated/annotated? evaluated/annotated?

Do the links work? Do the links work? Do the links represent other viewpoints? Do the links represent other viewpoints? Do the links (or absence of other viewpoints) Do the links (or absence of other viewpoints)

indicate a bias? indicate a bias?

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Page 15: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

4. What do others say?4. What do others say? TechniquesTechniques : :1. Find out what other web pages link to this page. 1. Find out what other web pages link to this page.

a. Use alexa.com URL information: a. Use alexa.com URL information: Simply paste the url into alexa.com's search box. Simply paste the url into alexa.com's search box. You will see, depending on the volume of traffic to the page: You will see, depending on the volume of traffic to the page:

Traffic rank Traffic rank Subjective reviews Subjective reviews Contact/ownership info for the domain name Contact/ownership info for the domain name A link to the Internet archive of website history A link to the Internet archive of website history

"Wayback Machine" "Wayback Machine" 2. Look the page up in a reputable directory that evaluates its 2. Look the page up in a reputable directory that evaluates its

contents (Librarians' Index, AcademicInfo, or a specialized contents (Librarians' Index, AcademicInfo, or a specialized directory you trust). directory you trust).

3. Look up the author's name in Google or Yahoo! 3. Look up the author's name in Google or Yahoo!

Page 16: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Who links to the page?Who links to the page?

Are there many links? Are there many links? What kinds of sites link to it? What kinds of sites link to it? What do they say? What do they say? Are any of them directories? Try looking at what Are any of them directories? Try looking at what

directories say. directories say.

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Page 17: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Is the page listed in one or more reputable Is the page listed in one or more reputable directories or pages? directories or pages?

What do others say about the author or What do others say about the author or responsible authoring body? responsible authoring body?

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Page 18: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

5. Does it all add up?5. Does it all add up?

Techniques :Techniques : 1. Step back and think about all you have 1. Step back and think about all you have

learned about the page. Listen to your gut learned about the page. Listen to your gut reaction. Think about why the page was created, reaction. Think about why the page was created, the intentions of its author(s). the intentions of its author(s). If you have doubts, ask your instructor or come to one If you have doubts, ask your instructor or come to one

of the library reference desks and ask for advice. of the library reference desks and ask for advice. 2. Be sensitive to the possibility that you are the 2. Be sensitive to the possibility that you are the

victim of irony, spoof, fraud, or other falsehood. victim of irony, spoof, fraud, or other falsehood. 3. Ask yourself if the web is truly the best place 3. Ask yourself if the web is truly the best place

to find resources for the research you are doing. to find resources for the research you are doing.

Page 19: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Why was the page put on the Why was the page put on the web?web?

Inform, give facts, give data? Inform, give facts, give data? Explain, persuade? Explain, persuade? Sell, entice? Sell, entice? Share? Share? Disclose? Disclose?

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Page 20: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Might it be ironic? Satire or Might it be ironic? Satire or parody?parody?

Think about the "tone" of the page. Think about the "tone" of the page. Humorous? Parody? Exaggerated? Overblown Humorous? Parody? Exaggerated? Overblown

arguments? arguments? Outrageous photographs or juxtaposition of Outrageous photographs or juxtaposition of

unlikely images? unlikely images? Arguing a viewpoint with examples that suggest Arguing a viewpoint with examples that suggest

that what is argued is ultimately not possible. that what is argued is ultimately not possible.

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions

Page 21: Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply & Questions to Ask  Internet/Evaluate.html

Is this as good as resources I Is this as good as resources I could find if I used the library?could find if I used the library?

Are you being completely fair? Too harsh? Are you being completely fair? Too harsh? Totally objective? Requiring the same degree of Totally objective? Requiring the same degree of "proof" you would from a print publication? "proof" you would from a print publication?

Is the site good for some things and not for Is the site good for some things and not for others? others?

Are your hopes biasing your interpretation? Are your hopes biasing your interpretation?

asking a series of questionsasking a series of questions