evaluating sodium initiatives rashon i. lane, m.a. evaluation and program effectiveness team...

22
Evaluating Sodium Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September 14, 2010

Upload: frederica-charlene-jenkins

Post on 12-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Evaluating Sodium InitiativesEvaluating Sodium Initiatives

Rashon I. Lane, M.A.Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team

Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention

September 14, 2010

Page 2: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Disclaimer Statement

The information presented here is for training purposes and reflects the views of the presenter. It does not

necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Page 3: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Overview of Today’s SessionToday’s session will address the following:

Page 4: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Why Sodium Reduction?• Excess sodium intake is a known risk factor for high blood pressure

and CVD events.• Average consumption of sodium in the United States is far greater

than recommended limits.– 2005 Dietary Guidelines recommendation: <2,300 mg/day (1,500 mg

for specific populations)

– Average intake: 3,466 mg/day

• The majority of sodium consumed comes from processed and restaurant foods.

• Policy and environmental changes are needed to speed decreases in sodium intake.

Page 5: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Relative Amounts of Dietary Sodium in the American Diet

Food Processing

77%

Naturally Occurring

12%

At the table6%

During Cooking5%

Source: Mattes RD, Donnelly, D. Relative contributions of dietary-sodium sources. J Am Coll Nutr. 1991 Aug;10(4):383-93.

Page 6: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Similar Foods Have Less Sodium in the U.K.

U.S. sodium/serving

210 mg

U.K. sodium/serving

160 mg

U.S. sodium/serving

220 mg

U.K. sodium/serving

120 mg

Page 7: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Sample Food Label, U.S.

Page 8: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Sodium Reduction Policies and Strategies

Page 9: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

ProcurementPolicies designed to make the healthy food more available, affordable, and appealing. They can work to change individual

factors (i.e., knowledge of how to choose healthy options), social factors (i.e., social norms), and environmental factors

(i.e., access to healthy options).

Page 10: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Labeling Studies

• Studies assess:– Awareness– Knowledge– Consumer choices/behavior

• Calorie Labeling And Food Choices: A First Look At The Effects On Low-Income People In New York City

– http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/28/6/w1110

• Stanford Study Shows Posting Calories on Restaurant Menu Boards Lowers Customers’ Calorie Counts per Visit

– http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/starbucks.html

Page 11: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Venue Based Strategies• Worksites

• Schools

• Hospitals

Page 12: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Example Media Evaluation Champlain (Canada) “GIVE YOUR HEAD A SHAKE”

Sodium Reduction Media Campaign

• Evaluation Design

-Telephone survey repeated 6, 12, & 24 months post launch of campaign. -Respondents (n=1,600 per community) of Champlain and control community-Assess attitudes, knowledge and behaviors of related to dietary sodium

2010. Champlain Cardiovascular Prevention Network Annual Report 2009-10

Page 13: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Example Media Evaluation Results • Four-in-ten respondents say the campaign has been instrumental in

getting them to reduce their sodium intake

– Most respondents are concerned about eating too much sodium– 70% are trying to cut back on the amount of sodium they are eating– 50% of respondents were not able to correctly identify many high sodium

foods– Many respondents report regularly eating foods high in sodium

2010. Champlain Cardiovascular Prevention Network Annual Report 209-10

Page 14: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Why Evaluate Now?• Determine if policies or environmental changes are effective in attaining expected

outcomes [e.g., knowledge, attitude, consumer behavior]• Share lessons learned among public health practitioners and other partners.

Page 15: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Logic ModelsMediating Factors

Individual Factors-Increased knowledge of health effects of sodium -Increased knowledge of how to choose low sodium foods

Increased intention to consume low sodium foods

Decreased sodium consumption

Decrease blood pressure

Label sodium content of foods

Health Impact

Biological-Increased sensitive ‘taste of salt” -Decreased sodium preference

Potential Food Procurement Policy Components

Promote healthy low sodium options

Decrease cost of healthy low sodium options

Increase the availability of low sodium options

Social Factors-increase positive social norms around reducing sodium consumptions

Environmental Factors-increase access to low sodium optionsDecrease affordability gap of low sodium options

Page 16: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Example Procurement Evaluation Questions

Process – To what extent have agencies implemented procurement standards?

• Have agencies met standards?• Were manufactures able to meet standards?• What were the resources needed?

Outcome– What is the impact of the policy...

• on cost of certain foods?• on the food or nutrients (such as sodium) that clients consume?• on client health (i.e. blood pressure, weight)?

Page 17: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Indicators and Data Sources• Proportion of procurement policy/standards for foods purchased,

served or sold that are passed• Proportion of agencies adhering to policy/standards• Proportion of meals served that have lower sodium options

• Data Sources– Documentation of policies passed– Purchase records– Point of purchase/sales data– Audits of agency menus– Dietary surveys (consumer level)

Page 18: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Group Activity1. Choose a strategy or intervention

2. Select 2 possible evaluation questions (process and outcome)

3. Determine what indicators will help answer these questions.

4. Determine if there is an existing data source or if one can be developed.

Page 19: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Evaluation Plan TemplateActivity Evaluation Question Data Source Data Collection/Analysis

Implement procurement standards for food nutrients to include sodium

To what extent have agencies complied with new standards?

Purchase records/receipts/menus

Pre/post-purchase records/receipts/menus audit.

Page 20: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Related Workshops

• Reducing Sodium Intake—What Are the Policy Opportunities? (WK-12)

• The BRFSS 2012 Salt Intake Module ─ Possible State-Added Questions in 2011 (19-A)

Page 21: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Q & A

Page 22: Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September

Contact Information

Rashon LaneE-mail: [email protected]