european practice in ict supported teaching and learning european study visit, cnam pays de la...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
European practice in ICT supported teaching and learning European study visit, CNAM Pays de la Loire,
Nantes, Oct 7th 2008
Deborah Arnold, eLearning project manager eLene-TT / eLene-TLC coordinator, Vidéoscop – Université Nancy 2
2/33
Plan
(30’) Part 1: introduction– Brief history of eLene group– Pooling and sharing European resources for ICT-supported teaching
& learning (60’) Part 2: presentation, demonstration and discussion
– Examples of innovative practice and associated resources from HE and VET
(30’) Part 3: hands-on
– Practise using the Teaching and Learning Centre (30’) Part 4: feedback and discussion
– Impressions of TLCentre, own examples of innovative practice, potential for further exploitation
3/33
Once upon a time…
2003: ‘Virtual models of European Universities’ European Commission DG Education and Culture
www.elearningeuropa.info/extras/pdf/virtual_models.pdf (EN)
Study in 200 universities
8 case studies :– France : CANEGE (consortium) – Italy : Politecnico di Milano – Germany : Bremen University – The Netherlands : Utrecht University– Finland : Finnish Virtual University– Spain : Open University of Catalonia – Sweden : Umeå University– United Kingdom : UKHEP – + Poland : Polish Virtual University
4/33
The group takes form…
November 2003, Milan
“let’s work together”
February 2004, Bremen
Defining strategic axes
May 2004, Nancy
Developing first project …
Pedagogy
Strategy
Organisation
Technology
5/33
A guiding principle…
True collaboration
Transnational workgroups
Co-design, co-production, co-delivery
EUROPEAN ADDED VALUE!
Credit: Ms Ladyred, www.flickr.com
6/33
2007-2008
Teaching and Learning service Centre[coord: Vidéoscop-UN2, France]
Preparing HE for the net generation students Teachers, teacher trainers, instructional designers, decision makers
Three eLene projects
2005-2006
Teacher training and the innovative use of ICT in Higher Education[coord: Vidéoscop-UN2: France]
Virtual learning resource centre Teacher training actions
2006-2007
Economics of eLearning[coord: Univ. Umeå, Sweden]
Cost-benefit analysis Student performance
Indicators Digital divides
7/33
eLene-TLC - Teaching and Learning Centre
www.tlcentre.net
8/33
(60’) Part 2: presentation, demonstration and discussion
Examples of innovative practice and associated resources from HE and VET
1. European pedagogical ICT competency framework for teachers, trainers, learners and educational technologists
2. collaborative work -> wikis (Sweden, Italy)
3. peer feedback -> annotation tool (the Netherlands)
4. using video to demonstrate complex actions and gestures -> VITRA: Virtual training in Glass Art (EU)
5. Evaluation -> SEVAQ: a self-assessment instrument for evaluating quality in eLearning (EU)
9/33
1) European pedagogical ICT competency framework (1/3)
Methodology
– Desk research: competency frameworks
– Transnational study – focus groups of teachers and teacher trainers
– Validation via Delphi method – 78 experts from 12 countries
– Parallel studies with students and educational technologists
– Confrontation with competency roles and domains from eLene-TT
– Development of an overall framework
10/33
1) European pedagogical ICT competency framework (2/3)
11/33
1) European pedagogical ICT competency framework (3/3)
Applications:– Professional development activities for HE teachers
. Digital assessment / collaboration / …– Learning actions for students
. Digital literacy– Virtual guide for educational technologists / instructional designers
Approach (see also http://www.tlcentre.net/show_id_card.cgi?ID=64– Target group / context– Need– Competencies to be developed– Design action around framework and TLCentre content– Deliver (online, blended, face to face)– Evaluation
12/33
2) Collaborative work using wikis (Sweden, Italy) (1/3)
Collaborative work– Why? – What for?
What’s a wiki?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dnL00TdmLY
Why wikis?
13/33
2) Collaborative work using wikis (Sweden, Italy) (2/3)
Advantages of wikis– Students can work collaboratively, independent of time or place – Don’t require a high degree of technical skills– Teacher can follow individual students and group processes
Possible constraints?– Knowledge of software– Participation
Basic guidelines– Define task clearly– Limit in time– Link participation to assessment (process, not just result)
14/33
2) Collaborative work using wikis (Sweden, Italy) (3/3)
For more information, search the TLCentre:
WIKI http://www.tlcentre.net/show_id_card.cgi?ID=71
Wiki, Blog, Skype, Podcast and the “next things”: which are their interactions with the university world? http://www.tlcentre.net/show_id_card.cgi?ID=111
15/33
3) Peer feedback using an annotation tool (the Netherlands) (1/4)
What is peer feedback?– Feedback from fellow students
. exchanging drafts and comments on each others' drafts
. giving a grade -> peer assessment
Advantages?– peers share same perspectives and problems– learner may feel less threatened by feedback from peers– develops critical thinking
16/33
3) Peer feedback using an annotation tool (the Netherlands) (2/4)
Example: annotation systemwww.annotatiesysteem.nl
See ‘Annotation tool’: http://www.tlcentre.net/show_id_card.cgi?ID=40
17/33
3) Peer feedback using an annotation tool (the Netherlands) (3/4)
18/33
3) Peer feedback using an annotation tool (the Netherlands) (4/4)
a collaborative tool for discussion in context, to give specific feedback and develop more efficient communication.
Effective feedback on texts is:
– on time (with a plan phase and a revision phase)– specific– aimed at content + structure+ style– contains all 4 feedback functions
. Analysis, Evaluation, Explanation, Suggestion– criterion-referenced through headings– constructive
Motivation:– feedback provider (the writer rates the feedback (s)he receives)– all participants: clear rules concerning the expected frequency of
posting and reacting.
19/33
4) Using video to demonstrate complex actions and gestures
VITRA: Virtual training in Glass Art Socrates Leonardo da Vinci project (2005-2007)
– Vidéoscop-Université Nancy 2 & CERFAV (FR)– Abatte Zanetti Glass School, Murano (IT)– Kalmar - Pukeberg Design School (SE)– Glass School Novy Bor (CZ)
Target groups– craftspeople and SME’s in the glass art sector– training centres for glassmaking techniques – artists and designers who design objects in glass
Objectives– improve the competitiveness of the glass industry in Europe by
developing the skills of professionals in the sector– enable a greater number of people to learn the techniques
developed in other countries
20/33
The first European virtual centre for training in glass art and
techniques
12 traditional techniques in 5 languages (FR, EN, SE, IT, CZ)
Distance, blended or autonomous learning
Each didactic video accompanied by pedagogical documents
- A pedagogical guide- Advice and tips synchronised with the video- A list of equipment and tools- A bibliography and list of useful websites- Frequently Asked Questions- Photographs of pieces produced using each technique - A presentation and the history of the know-how in question- A translation tool for technical terms
www.e-vitra.eu/
4) Using video to demonstrate complex actions and gestures
21/33
4) Using video to demonstrate complex actions and gestures
Why video? Gestures and know-how at the heart of glass art
Added value:
- Can learn at own pace - glass masters work fast!
- Concentration - real workshop hot and noisy!
- Emotionally neutral - apprentices often overwhelmed by presence of glass master!
22/33
5) Evaluation: self-assessment instrument for evaluating quality
SEVAQ: a self-assessment instrument for evaluating quality in eLearning
Socrates Leonardo da Vinci project (2005-2007)
www.sevaq.com
23/33
Project Promoter: EFODL
Project partners: NADE (Norway)
BEODL (Belgium) CESI Iberia (Spain)
VMU (Lithuania) Le Préau (France)
Vidéoscop/UN2 (France)
ISQ (Portugal)B-I-L-D (UK)
3 products: Inventory
ToolManual
E-learning course+
effective evaluation =
Better Quality learning
Aims of the project1. Improve the quality of e-learning
experiences2. Development of multi-functional
design tool for self-evaluation3. Provide a guide for improving
quality4. Work with local Target Reference
Groups5. Dissemination at a European level
24/33
First challenge : Scoping the project
Learner
Company Management
Learning Department
Company Department
External Providers
External Facilitators
Third Parties (government agencies etc)
Wider Public
Who are the key stakeholders?
Who will carry out the evaluation? ?
25/33
Second challenge: Using a quality model
© EFQM Excellence Model
26/33
Third challenge: Using an evaluation model
The Kirkpatrick model
Level 1: Reactions – a ‘Smile Sheet’ completed by the learner.
Level 2: Learning outcomes – attempts to measure what has been learned (skills, knowledge and/or attitudes)
Level 3: Transfer of learning to the everyday environment – changes in behaviour
Level 4: Results for the organisation
such as increased productivity, increased sales, lower costs etc.
27/33
Tool functionalities
The stakehold
ers
The learnersSEVAQ tool
administrator
The entity who designs the
questionnaire to be applied to the
learner The final recipients of the results. The
people for whom the evaluation is really
set-up.
1 – Securing the purpose of the
evaluation
2 – Building the questionnaire framework to be applied
3 – Applying the questionnaires
6 – Building an action plan for
improvement
5 – Analysing
the results
4 – Getting the results
The questionna
ire Designer
Enables the designer with
instalment and setting the tool
Three functions in the tool1 – designing the questionnaire2 – producing 3 – consulting results
28/33
Create a new questionnaire
Step 1
Setup your questionnaire
Step 2
Define the objectives of your questionnaire
- Three steps to create your questionnaire
Step 3
Develop your questionnaire
29/33
Summary:
•Combines EFQM and Kirkpatrick for an innovative framework and approach
•Identifies the various stakeholders with an interest in evaluation
•Provides a tool for the designer prompting coverage of all relevant issues
•Allows flexibility for the designer to add and customise questions to give relevance to all applications.
30/33
EFODL Project manager Helga Van [email protected]
For France:Anne-Marie Husson,CCIP [email protected]
Edwige Morin, Vidéoscop-UN2 [email protected]
For additional questions, a personal test log-in
or further dialogue:
WWW.SEVAQ.COM
31/33
(30’) Part 3: hands-on
Practise searching the TLCentre Register as users to:
– comment on existing resources – rate them– add your own
www.tlcentre.net
32/33
(30’) Part 4: feedback and discussion
The thing I liked best about the TLCentre
The thing I liked least
The name of a resource I would like to add
My ideas for future use
33/33
Thank you!
Deborah Arnold
Project manager
Vidéoscop-Université Nancy 2, France
www.univ-nancy2.fr/VIDEOSCOP
www.elene-centre.netAll about eLene…