eu ipa13/cs-02 - epg) projesi · stu schedule time unit tor terms of reference ... • photo and...

1

EU IPA13/CS-02.a

2013 ENERGY SECTOR PROGRAM PHASE-2 PROJECT

Energy Market Development

Task 1E

Workshop 3 Report [English Version]

Revision 1

July 2019

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................ 3

TABLES INDEX ........................................................................................................................................ 5

FIGURES INDEX ...................................................................................................................................... 6

1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 7

2 AGENDA ........................................................................................................................................ 8

3 WORKSHOP OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................... 10

3.1 ISSUES COVERED DURING WORKSHOP ............................................................................................... 11

4 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ................................................................................................................. 13

5 SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS .................................................................................................. 20

6 ATTENDANCE CERTIFICATE TEMPLATE......................................................................................... 22

7 MATERIAL SHARED ...................................................................................................................... 23

3

TABLE OF ACRONYMS

Acronym Definition

ACE Area Control Error

ACER Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators

BASM Balancing and Ancillary Services Market (in Europe)

BPM Balancing Power Market (in Turkey)

BRP Balance Responsible Party

BSE Balancing Service Entity (owned by a BSP)

BSP Balancing Service Provider

DAM Day Ahead Market

DR Demand Response

EMRA Energy Market Regulatory Authority

ENTSO-E European Network of Transmission System Operators

EU European Union

FiT Feed-in Tariff

GL Guidelines (used in reference to ENTSO-E)

GO Guaranties of Origin

IDM Intra-Day Market

IEM Internal Energy Market

IPA Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance

MO Market Operator

MoU Memorandum of Understanding

NRA National Regulatory Authority

RES Renewable Energy Sources

RTBM Real Time Balancing Market

4

Acronym Definition

RTU Real-Time Unit

SO System Operator (TEIAS)

STU Schedule Time Unit

ToR Terms of Reference

VoLL Value of Lost Load

5

TABLES INDEX

Table 1 – Event’s Agenda.............................................................................................................................. 8

Table 2 – List of participants (Day 1) .......................................................................................................... 13

Table 3 – List of participants (Day 2) .......................................................................................................... 13

Table 4 – Results of the Satisfaction Survey ............................................................................................... 21

6

FIGURES INDEX

Figure 1 – Opening remarks ....................................................................................................................... 10

Figure 2 – Questions from the Audience .................................................................................................... 11

Figure 3 - Original Attendance Sheet (Day 1, 1/3) ...................................................................................... 15





Figure 8 - Satisfaction Survey Template ..................................................................................................... 20

Figure 9 - Survey Results (Mean values) ..................................................................................................... 21

Figure 10 - Attendance Certificate Template ............................................................................................. 22

7

1 INTRODUCTION

The Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) is the means by which the European Union (EU) supports reforms in the 'enlargement countries' with financial and technical help. The IPA funds build up the capacities of the countries throughout the accession process, resulting in progressive, positive developments in the region.

This project - Energy Market Development- is funded as part of the Energy Sector Program (Phase 2) and relates to the second IPA Multi-Annual Indicative Planning Document (MIPD) 2011-2013 objective: “further alignment with and implementation of acquis on the internal gas and electricity market”. Within this framework, the studies on the harmonization of electricity and natural gas laws following the adoption of the EU Third Energy Package are ongoing. Within this context, IPA funds and EU experience are crucial, in order to achieve a better functioning internal energy market.

The goal of this document is to satisfy the ToR requirements that explicitly entail, for each of the workshops associated to the project tasks, the following deliverables:

• Preparation a short workshop report which will include a short overview of the training material and the discussions held during the workshop (This document)

• Ensure the attendance of the speakers/discussants who will participate in these events.

• Photo and video shooting of these events

• Compiling the list of attendees

• Distribution of participant satisfaction survey forms during these events and reporting on the results of these surveys in the Workshop Reports

• Provision of attendance certificates to the successful attendees of these events

In order to do so, this document provides for each the following material:

• Training Agenda

• Short overview of the training material and discussions held, including photos of the

event (video footage and additional images have been shared with client on a separate

file)

• List of Participants (including original attendance lists)

• Results of the survey carried out after the sessions (original surveys have been shared separately with the client’s project coordinator) and comments

• Presented material (power point presentations)

• Template of the attendance certificate delivered to all participants

8

2 AGENDA

Table 1 – Event’s Agenda

EU IPA13/CS-02.a - Energy Market Development Project

Workshop on Balancing Power Market Assessment and Recommendations

Ankara 18/19 July

Module Content Schedule

Thursday 18/07/2019

1

Why are we here?

Task 1C scope and objectivesw

The Balancing Power Market (BPM) design

Thursday 10:00 – 11:30

1.1 Current regulatory provisions & practice

1.2 18 design variables to be evaluated / assessed

1.3 Problems / gaps identified

1.4 Main issues to be improved

1.5 Discussion and questions

Coffee break Thursday 11:30 – 11:45

2 Proposal for the future design of the Balancing Power Market

Thursday 11:45 – 13:00

2.1 Self-scheduling & central dispatch concept

2.2 Corrective Integrated Scheduling Process (ISP)

2.3 Procurement of reserves

2.4 Corrective ISP scope and modeling

2.5 Participation in BPM

Lunch break Thursday 13:00 – 14:30

2.6 Procurement of Balancing Energy in real-time Thursday 14:30 – 16:00

2.7 Real-Time Balancing Market scope and modeling

2.8 Pricing of Balancing Energy / price cap & floor

9

Module Content Schedule

2.9 Imbalance Settlement provisions

2.10 Allocation of reserve costs

2.11 Outline of final recomendations

Friday 19/07/2019

2.12 Open discussion for BPM recommendations and questions

Friday 10:00 – 11:30

3 Optimal participation of RES and Demand Response resources to the BPM

3.1 Optimal design for DR Aggregators

Coffee break Friday 11:30 – 11:45

3.2 Optimal design variables for RES and DR resources

Friday 11:45 – 13:00

3.3 Procurement and activation of ancillary services

3.4 Discussion and questions

Lunch break Friday 13:00 – 14:30

4 Wrapping up and open discussion about recomendations

Friday 14:30 – 16:00

10

3 WORKSHOP OVERVIEW

Workshop 3 covered the topics related to the work developed under Task 1C of the project related to the evaluation of the Balancing Power Market in Turkey. The technical consultant of ECCO International Inc., Prof. Pandelis Biskas, gave the presentation to the audience comprising of executives from TEIAS, EMRA, the Ministry of Energy and the World Bank.

Figure 1 – Opening remarks

The presentation concerned the various design variables of the Balancing Power Market that were evaluated during the project and described in the relevant Assessment Report and Recommendation Report. The presented design variables were grouped in four (4) categories, as follows:

1st category: reserves’ procurement

a) Timing of primary and secondary reserve auctions

b) Procurement of tertiary reserve

c) Symmetrical reserve requirements

d) Pricing of primary, secondary and tertiary reserves

e) Participation of generating units to primary / secondary reserve auctions

2nd category: scheduling phase and real-time Balancing Market

f) Separate reserve and balancing energy procurement processes

g) Central- vs. self-scheduling and dispatch principle

h) Definition of marginal price of balancing energy

i) Pricing of balancing energy

j) Participation in the Balancing Power Market

k) Execution of a Real-Time Balancing Market (RTBM) optimization model

l) Real-Time Unit (RTU)

11

m) Price cap / floor in the Balancing Energy offers / bids

3rd category: imbalance settlement and allocation of reserve costs

n) Formation of Balancing Responsible Groups

o) Imbalance settlement period

p) Imbalance pricing scheme

q) Allocation of reserve costs to market participants

4th category: RES and DR resources

r) Active participation of RES and DR resources in the Balancing Market

3.1 ISSUES COVERED DURING WORKSHOP

The representative of World Bank, Mr. Nick Frydas, expressed his concerns on the central re-scheduling process, the so-called “corrective ISP”, stating that it is good to be a pro-active TSO (as the UK TSO is) but such proactive scheduling/dispatch can be performed also in other ways. There was a lot of discussion in this respect, with Prof. Biskas stating the advantages of this proposal and the exact formulation, input and results of the proposed “corrective ISP”.

There were also several other issues / questions raised by the participants, all of which were answered by Prof. Biskas in a satisfying manner.

Mr. Frydas mentioned another two issues that could be incorporated in the Recommendation Report, as follows:

1) the incentive-based system for the TSO (TEIAS), in order to try to minimize his operation expenses and the reserve costs allocated to the Load Representatives and ultimately to the end-consumers, and

2) the entity that should perform the Balancing Power Market settlement is usually the TSO and not the Market Operator (as is the case in Turkey, where the settlement is performed by EPIAS).

Figure 2 – Questions from the Audience

12

Accepting the comments of Mr. Frydas, Prof. Biskas stated that he would include such commentary and respective recommendations in the revised Recommendation Report of Task 1C.

13

4 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

The following list shows the participants that participated in the event.

Table 2 – List of participants (Day 1)

# NAME INSTITUTION

1 BUDAK DILLI WB

2 ABDI KORPINAR TEIAS

3 MERDEN YESIL TEIAS

4 FAHRI TASKIN TEIAS

5 ERKAN OZKOC TEIAS

6 BEKIR TAS TEIAS

7 GOKCEN KASAPOGLU YARAMIS MENR

8 ELIF ALTINIGNE MENR

9 EMRAH SOLAK MENR

10 ALI BURAK YOLASAN MENR

11 ONUR DONMEZCELIK MENR

12 ALI DURSUN TEIAS

13 NICK FRYDAS IFC

14 HEZAR TANRISEVER AB BASKANLIGI

15 ILKER UCLER EMRA

16 NURULLAH CAKMAK EMRA

17 BUNYAMIN INAN TEIAS

18 MURATHAN YENICELI TEIAS

19 BERKAY BAYTOK TEIAS

20 UMIT BUYUKDAGLI TEIAS

Table 3 – List of participants (Day 2)

# NAME INSTITUTION

1 UMIT BUYUKDAGLI TEIAS

2 BUDAK DILLI WB

3 FAHRI TASKIN TEIAS

4 ABDI KORPINAR TEIAS

5 MERDEN YESIL TEIAS

6 ERKAN OZKOC TEIAS

7 BEKIR TAS TEIAS

8 ALI DURSUN TEIAS

9 BUNYAMIN INAN TEIAS

10 MURATHAN YENICELI TEIAS

11 ONUR DONMEZCELIK MENR

12 ALI BURAK YOLASAN MENR

13 EMRAH SOLAK MENR

14 ELIF ALTINIGNE MENR

15 ALI OSMAN YILMAZ TEIAS

16 NICK FRYDAS IFC

17 GOKCEN KASAPOGLU YARAMIS MENR

14

A total of 17 participants assisted to the complete sessions, although during day 1, 20 participants signed the attendance sheets. Only those participants that provided an email address and that completed both days will receive the attendance certification.

15

Figure 3 - Original Attendance Sheet (Day 1, 1/3)

16


17


18


19


20

5 SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

The following template was used in order to collect the answers of the satisfaction surveys.

Figure 8 - Satisfaction Survey Template

The results of the survey were very satisfactory, the number of respondents was 14, out of the 17 participants. The results are shown below:

EU IPA13/CS-02.a - Energy Market Development Project

Workshop on BPM Operations Assessment and Recommendations -

Satisfaction Survey 1. The speaker(s) was(were) intellectually challenging

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

1 2 3 4 5

2. The speaker(s) was(were) presented material in a clear manner

1 2 3 4 5

3. The speaker(s) was(were) well prepared for each session

1 2 3 4 5

4. The speaker(s) showed concern for atendees' understanding of the material

1 2 3 4 5

5. Overall, the session(s) was(were) well organized

1 2 3 4 5

6. The level of the material was adequate, according to expectations and allowed a better

understanding of the workshop’s topics

Below Expectations Above Expectations

1 2 3 4 5

7. Was the length of the event too long, too short or about right?

Too Short Too Long

1 2 3 4 5

8. Overall, how would you rate your speaker(s)?

Lowest Highest

1 2 3 4 5

9. Please help us improve, kindly add any additional comment regarding speaker(s) and / or

workshop organization

21

Table 4 – Results of the Satisfaction Survey

BPM Report

Question Mean Median Mode

Intellectually challenging 4.64 5.00 5.00

Presented in a clear manner 4.71 5.00 5.00

Prepared for each session 4.79 5.00 5.00

Concern for attendees' understanding 4.64 5.00 5.00

Well organized 4.64 5.00 5.00

Adequate level 4.29 4.00 4.00

Speaker rate 4.64 5.00 5.00

Length 3.21 3.00 3.00

For all questions the best response possible was a 5 except for the one related to the length of the event, to which the optimal response would be a 3. It can be seen that all answers are on average very close to 4.5 out of 5 in satisfaction level, being the length of the workshop quite optimal given the responses of the attendees (3.2 on average).

The average answers for each question are also shown on a graphical manner hereafter. The overall satisfaction metric is calculated as the average of the mean results to questions 1 through 6 and #8 (not taking into account Q#7).

Figure 9 - Survey Results (Mean values)

NOTE: The original scanned copies of the surveys have been shared with the project coordinator on the client side on a separate document.

22

6 ATTENDANCE CERTIFICATE TEMPLATE

Figure 10 - Attendance Certificate Template

23

7 MATERIAL SHARED

Available as an annex on a separate document shared with workshop’s participants.

.

This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the consultant and can in no way be taken to reflect the

views of European Union or MENR

eu ipa13/cs-02 - epg) projesi · stu schedule time unit tor terms of reference ... • photo and...

Documents