essp: developing an integrated earth system science approach · poverty in developing countries...
TRANSCRIPT
Rik LeemansEnvironmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen UniversityChair ESSP science committee
Website: www.essp.org
Rik LeemansEnvironmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen UniversityChair ESSP science committee
Website: www.essp.org
ESSP: developing an integrated Earth system
science approach
ESSP: developing an integrated Earth system
science approach
Global change is also local change!
o We lived between fields, orchards and forests and worked in the garden and with animals.
o Now 50 years later this area is part of the town: build-up area!
The ESSP programmes provide policy relevant information in all
stages of understanding and dealing with environmental problems.
Amsterdam Declaration (2001)The Declaration points out that “a new system of global environmental science is required that will:o integrate across disciplines, environment and
development issues and the natural and social sciences;
o collaborate across national boundaries on the basis of a shared and secure infrastructure;
o intensify efforts to enable the full involvement of developing country scientists; and
o employ the complementary strengths of nations and regions to build an efficient international system of global environmental science”.
In 2008, the ESSP Review Panel noted that the Amsterdam Declaration(2001) is more valid today than seven years ago.
What is Earth System Science?
ESS is the study of the Earth System with an emphasis on observing, understanding and predicting global environmental changes involving interactions between land, atmosphere, water, ice, biosphere, societies, technologies and economies.
To understand the physical-biogeochemical-ecological-human systems as complex, dynamic and evolving entities, both natural, technological, social, and economic sciences are needed in a interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary way.
The IGBP structure
ESSP facilitates the study of the Earth’s environment as an integrated system in order to understand how and why it is changing, and to explore the implications of these changes for global and regional sustainability.
Earth System Science Partnership
(ESSP)
Earth System Science Partnership:Joint science and capacity building
Structuresince 2002
Global Change System for Analysis, Research and Training
The objective of START’s research-driven capacity building activities is to engage the scientific communities of developing regions in international collaborative scientific research and policy discussions related to global change.
Through a framework of regional research centers, research nodes, science committees and secretariats, START:o Conducts research on regional aspects of global changeo Provides fellowship and education opportunitieso Shares knowledge, expertise and data
o Bridges between science & society to support decision making
o Mobilizes financial, institutional and human resources.
ESSP Contribution to policy relevant scientific assessments
Almost half of the contributors to IPCC AR4 are WCRP/IGBP/IHDP/DIVERSITAS associated scientists
Contributors include climatologists, meteorologists, atmospheric chemists, paleoecologists, ecologists, hydrologists, geographers, epidemiologists, economist and political scientists
Also a strong contributions to the Ozone Assessment, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and the Agricultural Assessment
“WCRP serves an irreplaceable role for
coordination within the science community, which in
turn is invaluable to the IPCC”
Dr. Susan Solomon, IPCC Working Group I Co-Chair
IHDP has internalized the joint projects in its strategic plan
Cros
s cu
ttin
g th
emes
MethodologiesWith IGBP
ESSP joint projects
An example of integrated research:Global Carbon Project (GCP)
The Global Carbon Project (GCP) was established in 2001 in recognition of the enormous scientific challenge and fundamentally critical nature of the carbon cycle for sustainability science.
The scientific goal of the project is to develop a complete picture of the global carbon cycle, including both its biophysical and human dimensions together with the interactions and feedbacks between them.
www.globalcarbonproject.org
Timeline for the new Climate scenariosRepresentative Concentration Pathways
(RCPs)
Linking to users: BioDISCOVERY
Earth System Science Partnership:Developing integrative science collaboration
Structuresince 2007
Applied Earth System Science and ESSP Rapid BIOFUELS assessment
(with SCOPE)What are the policy issues?
What are the earth system linkages, land use needs, systemic feedbacks and uncertainties?
What are plausible scenarios?What are the key vulnerabilities?
A new GEC Journal: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
o Focuses on review and synthesis paperso Possibilities to publish science planso Themes: Terrestrials systems; Aquatic systems;
Climate systems; Energy systems; Carbon and Nitrogen cycles; Human systems
o Will make outreach and educational material available
Earth System Science Partnership:Towards transdisciplinary integrative science
Structuresince 2009
Now, it’s more connected with collaboration with CGIAR
We also effectively connect with researchers from other organizations. For example, the International Agricultural Research Institutes (CGIAR) and ESSP will together implement a 10-years, M$250 challenge programme on Climate Change and Agriculture with integrated scenarios to assess food systems and food security
To achieve sustainable food security and reduce poverty in developing countries through scientific
research and research-related activities in the fields of agriculture, forestry, fisheries, policy, and environment.
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research(CGIAR; >65 countries, foundations & organizations that fund research in 15 centers)
Climate Variability and Change
CCCP Research Framework and Science ThemesCCCP Research Framework and Science Themes
ImprovedEnvironmental
Benefits
ImprovedLivelihoods
ImprovedFood Security
Current agricultural& food systems
Adapted agricultural& food systems
ADAPTATION PATHWAYS
4 Managing climate risk
5 Progressive climate change
6 Adaptation through mitigation
Trade-offs
1 Diagnosis, context and tradeoffanalysis
3 Researcher/stakeholder interactions
2 Role of macro-level policies
AN
ALY
TIC
AL
&D
IAG
NO
STIC
FRAM
EWO
RK
Lecture for UNFCCC-SBSTAJune 3 2010
SBSTA Dialogue on developments in research activities relevant to the needs of the Climate Convention.View on: http://unfccc2.meta-fusion.com/ kongresse/SB32/templ/play.php?id_kongresssession=2731&theme=unfccc
This lecture (with one by IPCC) helped tore-create thrust in climate research and highlighted the urgency of the climate problem.
The IPCC error on Himalayan does not alter conclusions
Chapter 10 Asia: Glaciers in the Himalaya are receding faster than in any other part of the world (see Table 10.9) and, if the present rate continues, the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high. Its total area will likely shrink from the present 500,000 to 100,000 km2 by the year 2035 (WWF, 2005).
Technical Summary: Increases in temperature are expected to result in more rapid recession of Himalayan glaciers and the continuation of permafrost thaw across northern Asia (medium confidence).
SPM: Glacier melt in the Himalayas is projected to increase flooding, and rock avalanches from destabilized slopes, and to affect water resources within the next two to three decades.
Increasing glacier lakes in the Himalaya
Adaptation is needed in regions that do not strongly
contribute to GHG emissions
Nayar, A. (2009). Climate: When the ice melts. Nature 461, 1042-1046
Warmest years:
2005, 1998, 2009 and 2007
Observed changes in temperature
Lyman, et al., 2010. Robust warming of the global upper ocean. Nature 465, 334-337.
The IGBP climate change index
Extinctions of species
Climate Change ≈0.9°C
Current Potential Vegetation
Climate Change ≈0.9°C +20% Deforest + Fire
Climate Change ≈3.2°C +50% Deforest + Fire
Climate Change ≈1.6°C
A World Bank Report 2010
2025 2075
Tropical Forest Savanna
Shrublands
Current Trends
StrongAction
Tropical Forest
Lost
Fate of Tropical
ForestUncertain
Tropical Forestto Savanna
Tropical Forestto Shrub
Analyses using theCPTEC-PVM2.0 model
Climate, land use and fire influence forests
Application of REDD+ initiatives could lead to a win-win situation for biodiversity and climate if appropriately implemented. A program of significant forest restoration would be a prudent measure to build in a margin of safety.
Rising sea surface temperatures and CO2concentrations are projected to damage
tropical coral reefs
Biologically realistic rates of adaptation may allow coral reefs to adapt to thermal stress, but only under scenarios of strong climate mitigation (Donner. 2009. PLoS ONE)
Fra
ctio
n o
f co
ral
reefs
w
ith
recu
rren
t se
vere
b
leach
ing
Impact with 1.5°C thermaladaptation of corals
Impact with no thermal adaptation
Before bleaching
After bleaching
[CO2]atm ≈ 700 ppm in 2100
[CO2]atm ≈ 550 ppm in 2100
Health and socio-economic impacts
o Climate change may increase rural population at Malaria risk by 36 to 89% by 2050
o Economic costs of additional Malaria burden $45 to $99 million per year but these costs may rise to $185 million per year
Proportion loss of labour productivity in 2080s under A2.The largest negative effect will occur in Latin America and South East Asia
Planetary Boundaries:Exploring the safe operating space for humanity in the
Anthropocene (Nature, 461 : 472 – 475, Sept 24 -
2009)
Johan Rockström, Will Steffen, Kevin Noone, Åsa Persson, F. Stuart Chapin, Eric F. Lambin, Timothy M. Lenton, Marten Scheffer, Carl Folke, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Björn Nykvist, Cynthia A. de Wit, Terry Hughes, Sander van der Leeuw, Henning Rodhe, Sverker Sörlin, Peter K. Snyder, Robert Costanza, Uno Svedin, Malin Falkenmark, Louise Karlberg, Robert W. Corell, Victoria J. Fabry, James Hansen, Brian Walker, Diana Liverman, Katherine Richardson, Paul Crutzen, Jonathan A. Foley
1.Earth System and sustainability science(Understanding Earth System processes; ICSU, IGBP, ESSP, IPCC, MEA, sustainability science…)
2.Scale of human action in relation to the capacity of the planet to sustain it(Spaceship Earth, Herman Daly, Club of Rome, Ecological Economics, Ecological Footprint...)
3.Shocks and Abrupt change in Social-Ecological systems from local to global scales(Resilience, GAIA, tipping elements, guardrails...)
Planetary Boundary concept rests on three different scientific inquiries
Planetary Boundaries
concept
Two different types ofplanetary boundary processes
2. No known global threshold effect1. Critical continental to global threshold
Literature review and expert judgement of boundaries
Climate change, nitrogen and biodiversity have already crossed their
boundaries
Recent trends in CO2 emissionsG
lobal Carb
on P
roje
ct 2
009;
LeQ
uér
éet
al. 2
009,
Natu
re-g
eosc
ience
; D
ata:
Pet
ers
& H
etw
ich
2009;
Pet
ers
et a
l. 2
008;
Web
er e
t al
2008;
Guan
et a
l. 2
008;
CD
IAC 2
009
Peters and Hertwich 2008, Environ, Sci & Tech., updated
MtCWarm colors Net exporters of embodied carbonCold colors Net importers of embodied carbon
Year 2004
Balance of emissions embodied in trade
Global Carbon Project 2009; Le Quéré et al. 2009, Nature Geoscience; Data: Peters & Hetwich 2009; Peters et al. 2008; Weber et al 2008; Guan et al. 2008; CDIAC 2009
CO2 emissions (PgC y-1)
Annex B
Industrial Nations
Emerging economies Non-Annex B
1990 2000 2010
5
4
3
2
55%
45%
1990 2000 2010
5
25% of growth
Annex B Industrial Nations
Emerging economies Non-Annex B
4
3
2
Transport of embodied emissions
domestic production domestic consumption
Natural CO2 Sinks
Le Quéré et al. 2009, Nature Geoscience
The decline in sinks causes a likely increase in the airborne fraction of 5% over the last 50 years.
Partitioning of CO2emissions
CO2emissions
Atmospheric CO2growth
(i.e. the airborne fraction)
Data: NOAA, CDIAC; Le Quéré et al. 2009, Nature geoscience
CO
2Par
titionin
g
(PgC y
-1)
1960 20101970 1990 20001980
10
8
6
4
2
Required emission reduction to stabilise at 450 ppm
International Energy Agency, 2009 World Energy Outlook
Different peak emissions to reach 450 ppm
Rogelj, J., B. Hare, J. Nabel, K. Macey, M. Schaeffer, K. Markmann, and M. Meinshausen. 2009. Halfway to Copenhagen, no way to 2oC. Nature Reports Climate Change Doi: 10.1038/climate.2009.57.
Conclusions (UNFCCC talk)
o A limitation in temperature increase of 2oC as indicated in the Copenhagen Accords allows for adaptation and limits dangerous impacts, but there are large regional differences with respect to sensitivity, impacts and adaptive capacity. Climate protection, however, is not guaranteed.
o Strong links between climate change and other environmental change issues, such as biodiversity. Synergies between climate and biodiversity policies may be explored
o The observed increases in emissions and the reduction of land and ocean sinks accelerate climate change, rather than limiting it.
o ESSP and partners can help to monitor, assess and understand progress towards desired targets
Martin Rice & Ada IgnaciukESSP Coordinators
Email: [email protected]: www.essp.org
Martin Rice & Ada IgnaciukESSP Coordinators
Email: [email protected]: www.essp.org
ContactContact
More information in our newsletters and magazines:
More information in our newsletters and magazines: