erp implementation - session-2
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
1/23
ERP IMPLEMENTATION SESSION 2
By
Vishnu Tunuguntla
B.Tech, MBA, PMP, CSSBB,CQA, (Ph.D)
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
2/23
Major items in the Agenda
Identification of ERP Technologies
Product Evaluation Challenges involved in selection of technology and how to handle
them
Business case Management
Business case preparation & Analysis
Stakeholders involvement in Business case preparation
Challenges in preparing the Business case and benefit quantification andhow to handle them
Review of the business case and articulation of the value indicators andapproval of the business case
Vendor Management
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
3/23
Identification of ERP Technologies
Discussions with the Subject Matter Experts
Participation in the technology forums to understand thebest practices and Lessons Learned
Interfacing with the Consulting Firms to understand
various options
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
4/23
Product/Technology Evaluation
Identify High LevelRequirements
DetailRequirements
Map RequirementsWith each Product
Check ifProduct is supporting all
req in this release
SupportedModification
3rd partyFuture releaseNot supported
Allocate Priority detailsfor each requirement
Develop rating forEach product
Evaluate the Ratings Select the Product
Field Visits where theProduct is working
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
5/23
Challenges involved in selection of technology
Ownership of the selection Process Business or IT
Business often wants to take the lead as they intend to leveragethe tool as a transformation enabler and hence want to see howthe tool can facilitate continuous optimization of businessprocesses, provide abstraction and reuse of business logic, andenable change in near real time
On the other hand, IT wants to ensure that the tool fits into thelarger enterprise architecture, integrates well with the enterprisesystems and meets performance and scalability expectations.
So the solution would be having the right level of participation fromboth sides is the best approach and ensures the tool is well
accepted and adopted over a period of time.
Features crucial for the selection process
Convincing the Business Units about Common Requirements
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
6/23
Business Case Management
Alignment
Financial Benefits
Non Financial Benefits
Risks
Optimizing Riskand Return
Documentation
Maintenance
Fact Sheet
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
7/23
Business Case
Financial Benefits:
Business Level:
Increase of Revenues
Increase of Volumes effecting the fixed cost per unit &productivity
Risk Mitigation resulting in lower failure cost Operational Level:
Identify the Current Cycle time and Estimated Cycle time for theTarget Process.
Collect the Cost being incurred in each step (effort)
Estimate the effort that would be incurred at each step in the TargetProcess
Identify the Pain Points in each Process and quantify the impact ofthese items in dollar terms.
Describe how the pain points would be minimized / eliminated in the
Target Process
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
8/23
Business Case
Non financial Benefits:
Enhancement of the Process functionality
Improved Governance of Processes
Increase in Brand Image
Availability of data/information
Relationships improvement with customers and suppliers
Increase in Quality of services
Increase in Customer satisfaction
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
9/23
Major Investments/Expenditures
Investments/Expenditures
Technology-related expenditures: hardware, software, installationand configuration costs, start-up and training cost.
Direct Operating and Maintenance Cost
Expenditures related to business process redesign, training and
adoption
Cost of Risk Mitigation and adjustments in the control framework
Time & money lost in the Parallel run
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
10/23
Alignment Analysis
Alignment With Strategic ObjectivesContribution of IT-related investments to atleast one ofthe strategic objectives
Contribution to the current objectives and priorities of theorganization.
Contribution to the objectives of a parent company or largercontext within which the organization is operating
Contribution to the achievement of a desired future state orbusiness vision
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
11/23
Alignment Analysis
Enterprise Architecture: The enterprise architecture refersto the way relationships among components of anorganization, including processes, people and technology,work together to create services and/or products.
Alignment With Enterprise Architecture Evaluation of the extent to which investments in IT-enabled
change are moving in the direction of the target architecture.
Comparison of alignment with the Target area for each business unit
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
12/23
Articulation of Value Indicators
Identification of Critical Business Processes
Articulation of expectations with respect to theseprocesses (Cycle time or defects, interface problems etc)
Quantify the expectation
Define as a Value Indicator and track this during theimplementation and demonstrate as part of benefitrealization this contributing to Business Strategy
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
13/23
Computation of the Financial Indicators
Conversion of Non financial benefits in to Dollar termsusing suitable assumptions.
Make suitable adjustments to the cash inflows/cashoutflows
Compute Net Present Value/Internal Rate of Return/Payback period
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
14/23
Risk Management
Major Categories of Risk:
Delivery riskThe risk of not delivering the required capabilitiesAre we doing things the right way ? This identifies the risk of
inconsistency with other current or potential programs and withexisting capabilities
Are we getting them done well? This identifies traditional project risk
- budgets, schedules and meeting required specifications and qualitystandards
Benefits riskThe risk of the expected benefits not beingobtained
Are we doing the right things? This identifies the risk of error or lack
of clarity in the desired business outcomes in a changingenvironment.
Are we getting the benefits? This identifies the risks around thebusiness being realistically able to realize the expected benefits ofthe program.
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
15/23
Documentation
Create the Business case as per the suggested templateand circulate it for review to all the stakeholders (Refer tothe template given below.)
The Business case is reviewed by the stakeholders andthe review comments are provided.
The modifications are done to the Business case as perthe review comments and sent for approval
The Business case is approved by Senior managementand is base lined
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
16/23
Maintenance
Change the Business case whenever there is a change inthe Projected Benefits ,Investments and risks.
The business case document should be part of the stagegate review process and would be an important
consideration whether to move forward with execution.
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
17/23
Vendor Selection
Creation of a manageable list of vendors for final reviewtypically three to five
Scheduled detailed product demonstrations
A check of vendors references
A visit to site where one of Vendors customers is using asimilar ERP solution
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
18/23
Criteria for Vendor selection
Vendors stake in the marketVendors background, Previous experiences, clientele
Cost of implementation, acquisition, support and upgrade
Past Implementation record of the vendor, experience in a
specific verticalTechnologies with which they have experience
Profiles of their consultants
Past record Project delivery
Risk mitigation plans and Business continuity assurancesbeing offered
Financial strengths and future goals of the Vendor
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
19/23
Vendor Management
Decide Scope ofRequirementsFor ERP
IdentifyVendors (3-5)
Establish Criteria forVendor selection
Evaluation ofProposals
Send Request forProposal
Vendor Short listingNegotiations
with Vendor(s)
Selection of VendorPrepare ServiceLevel agreement
Review of serviceLevel agreement
Move to Ist Phase ofERP Implementation
Anycomments?
No
Yes
Fine Tuning ofProposals By Vendors
Move to Next Phaseof Implementation
Review ofresults?
OK
Take Corrective
Action
Not OK
Make Mile Stone
Payment to Vendor
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
20/23
Overall Flow - Recap
Analysis of CurrentState
Quantify CurrentProcess Cost
Identify Costof failures
ERP SolutionEvaluation
Define Target State
Business CasePreparation
Business CaseReview
Anycomments?
Business CaseApproval
Yes
No
VendorManagement
Phase wiseImplementation of
ERP SolutionBenefit capturing
Move to Next Phase ofImplementation
Inline withBC?
Take Correctiveaction
No
Yes
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
21/23
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
22/23
Change Management and Training.This was mentioned as the major problem with implementations. Changing work practices to fit the
system is a major difficulty. Also mentioned were training across modules and starting training soonerTo BPR or not to BPRIt is difficult to draw the line between changing Business Processes to suit the system or retainingBusiness Processes and paying the cost, in dollars and time, to change the system. As time and costsqueeze the implementation, the usual path is to not modify the system, but to change the way peoplework. This feeds back into Change Management and Training.Poor PlanningPlanning covers several areas such as having a strong Business Case, to the availability of Users to makedecisions on configuration, to the investing in a plan that captures all the issues associated withimplementing it.Underestimating IT skills
As most people are upgrading from old technology, the skills of the staff need to be upgraded as well.The upgrade is also going to place significant demands on a team who are geared to maintain an old butstable environment. Usually this effort is underestimated.Poor Project Management
Very few organizations have the experience in house to run such a complex project as implementing alarge-scale integrated solution. It usually requires outside contractors to come in and manage such amajor exercise. It can be a fine line between abdicating responsibility and sharing responsibility. Manyconsulting firms do a disservice to their clients by not sharing the responsibility.Technology TrialsThe effort to build interfaces, change reports, customize the software and convert the data is normallyunderestimated. To collect new data, and clean the data being converted, will also require an effort thatis beyond what is normally expected.
-
7/31/2019 ERP Implementation - Session-2
23/23
Low Executive Buy-inImplementation projects need Senior Executive involvement to ensure the
right participation mix of Business and IT, and to resolve conflicts
Underestimating ResourcesMost common budget blow outs are change management and user training,
integration testing , process rework, report customisation and consulting
fees.
Insufficient Software EvaluationThis involves the surprises that come out after the software is purchased.Organizations usually do not do enough to understand what, and how the
product works before they sign on the bottom line. The Bleeding Edge ERP
is so massive and integrated that reporting and linking to other systems
(either your own or your customers and suppliers) can be much more
difficult than you expect. Companies looking at ERP need to examine howthey accept online feeds from a customer, or a customers' customer, and
examine the technological enablers as well as the implications of these
technologies inside of the Business.
.