erm - research report

8/14/2019 ERM - Research Report

1/34

JOB SATISFACTION ANDPERFORMANCE

RESEARCH REPORT

EMPLOYEE RELATION MANAGEMENT

COMSATS INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY


2/34

30

RESEARCH STUDY: JOB SATISFACTION & PERFORMANCE

TABLE OF CONTENT

1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 3

2 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................................................... 6

2.1 Job Satisfaction (Dissatisfaction)7

2.2 Theories of Job Satisfaction / Dissatisfaction ................... ............... .............. 7

2.3 Performance: ................................................................... ............... ............... 9

2.4 How can HRM be a Major Player in improving Performance? ...................... .. 12

2.5 Setting expectations to increase motivation and performance: .................. 13

3 FINDINGS & ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................................... 14

3.1 Communication of Goals & Strategies ....................................................... ... 15

3.2 Communication & Information Flow ............................................................. 15

3.3 Communication & Interpersonal relationship ............................................... 16

3.4 Interaction with other employees ........................................................... ..... 17

3.5 Value of Effort .............................................................................................. 17

3.6 Degree of Motivation .................................................................................... 18

3.7 Level of Job Security ...................................................................... .............. 19

3.8 Methodology of Implementing Change .................................................... ..... 19

3.9 Performance of Tasks ................................................................................... 20

3.10 Personal Growth & Development ................................................................ 21

3.11 Conflict resolution ................................................................................ ...... 21

3.12 Utilization of Skills .................................................................... ............... .. 22

3.13 Flexibility allowed .................................................................. ............... ..... 23

3.14 Climate of the Workplace ...................................................... ............... ...... 23

3.15 Salary vs. Experience ............................................................................ ..... 24

3.16 Quantity of work Expected ............................................................ ............. 25

3.17 Free Hand at Work ................................................................... ............... ... 25

3.18 Physical working conditions ....................................................................... 26

3.19 Workplace Discrimination ................................................. ............... .......... 27


3/34


4 PROPOSED MODEL FOR THE RESEARCH STUDY ......................................................................................................................................... 29

4.1 Our Proposed Model P&S MODEL (P: Performance and S: Satisfaction) .... 29

5 CONCLUSION ................. .................. .................. .................. ......... ...... ..... ...... ..... ...... 32

6 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................................... 33

1 INTRODUCTION

Attempting to understand the nature of job satisfaction and its effects on work performance is noteasy. For at least 50 years industrial/organizational psychologists have been wrestling with thequestion of the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance. Researchers have puta considerable amount of effort into attempts to demonstrate that the two are positively related ina particular fashion:

A happy worker is a productive worker

Although this sounds like a very appealing idea, the results of empirical literature are too mixedto support the hypothesis that job satisfaction leads to better performance or even that there is areliable positive correlation between these two variables. On the other hand some researchersargue that the results are equally inconclusive with respect to the hypothesis that there is no suchrelationship. As a result of this ambiguity, this relationship continues to stimulate research andre-examination of previous attempts. This report strives to describe the relation of jobsatisfaction and performance, keeping in mind the value this relation has for organizations.

Job Satisfaction An Internal State

Job satisfaction is a complex and multifaceted concept, which can mean different things todifferent people. Job satisfaction is usually linked with motivation, but the nature of thisrelationship is not clear. Satisfaction is not the same as motivation. "Job satisfaction is more anattitude, an internal state. It could, for example, be associated with a personal feeling of achievement, either quantitative or qualitative." In recent years attention to job satisfaction has

become more closely associated with broader approaches to improved job design and work organization, and the quality of working life movement.

Relationship between Job Satisfaction & Job Performance

The relationship between job satisfaction and performance is an issue of continuing debate andcontroversy. One view, associated with the early human relation's approach, is that satisfactionleads to performance. An alternative view is that performance leads to satisfaction. However, avariety of studies suggest that research has found only a limited relationship between satisfactionand work output and offer scant comfort to those seeking to confirm that a satisfied worker is


4/34

30


also a productive one. Labor turnover and absenteeism are commonly associated withdissatisfaction, but although there may be some correlation, there are many other possiblefactors. No universal generalizations about worker dissatisfaction exist, to offer easymanagement solutions to problems of turnover and absenteeism. The study suggests that it is

primarily in the realm of job design, where opportunity resides for a constructive improvement

of the worker's satisfaction level.Spector & Gibson Findings

Some say job satisfaction is simple how people feel about their jobs and different aspects of their jobs (Spector, 1997). This assumes that if employee like their jobs or certain aspects of their jobs, they will be satisfied or happy. If they dont like their jobs or certain aspects of their jobs,they will be satisfied or happy. If they dont like their jobs or certain aspects of their jobs, theywill be dissatisfied or unhappy. Others view job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction as feelings of happiness or unhappiness associated with doing a particular job as expressed by the job-holder (Gibson et al. 2000). This assumes that if employees verbally say they are happy with their jobs,we must assume that they are satisfied with their work. If they verbally say they are unhappy

with the jobs, we must assume that they are dissatisfied.Cheung and Scherling Finsings

Cheung and Scherling (1999) assert that job satisfaction or dissatisfaction from the perspectiveof fairness and processes used to meet out rewards. If people feel fairly treated from theoutcomes they receive, or the processes used, they will be satisfied. If on the other hand, peoplefeel unfairly treated from the outcomes they receive, or the processes used to disseminate thoseoutcomes, they will be dissatisfied. Job satisfaction consists of the feelings and attitudes one hasabout ones job. All aspects of a particular job, good and bad, positive and negative are likely tocontribute to the development of feelings of satisfaction or dissatisfaction

Basic Factors of Job Satisfaction

Individual performance is generally determined by three factors of Job Satisfaction. Motivation ,the desire to do the job, ability , the capability to do the job, and the work environment , thetools, materials, and information needed to do the job. If an employee lacks ability, the manager can provide training or replace the worker. If there is an environmental problem, the manager can also usually make adjustments to promote higher performance. But if motivation is the

problem, the manager's task is more challenging. Individual behavior is a complex phenomenon,and the manager may not be able to figure out why the employee is not motivated and how tochange the behavior. Thus, also motivation plays a vital role since it might influence negatively

performance and because of its intangible nature.

Practical Implications

Job Satisfaction can be an important indicator of how employees feel about their jobs and a predictor of work behaviors such as organizational citizenship, absenteeism , and turnover .Further, job satisfaction can partially mediate the relationship of personality variables anddeviant work behaviors.

One common research finding is that job satisfaction is correlated with life satisfaction. Thiscorrelation is reciprocal, meaning people who are satisfied with life tend to be satisfied with their
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absenteeismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turnover_(employment)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absenteeismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turnover_(employment)


5/34


job and people who are satisfied with their job tend to be satisfied with life. However, someresearch has found that job satisfaction is not significantly related to life satisfaction when other variables such as non work satisfaction and core self-evaluations are taken into account.

An important finding for organizations to note is that job satisfaction has a rather tenuouscorrelation to productivity on the job. This is a vital piece of information to researchers and

businesses, as the idea that satisfaction and job performance are directly related to one another isoften cited in the media and in some non-academic management literature.

In short, the relationship of satisfaction to productivity is not necessarily straightforward and can be influenced by a number of other work-related constructs, and the notion that "a happy worker is a productive worker" should not be the foundation of organizational decision-making.

With regard to job performance, employee personality may be more important than jobsatisfaction. The link between job satisfaction and performance is thought to be a spurious relationship ; instead, both satisfaction and performance are the result of personality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlationhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/personalityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spurious_relationshiphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spurious_relationshiphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlationhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/personalityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spurious_relationshiphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spurious_relationship


6/34

30


2 LIT ERATUR E REVIEW

Introduction

In the field of Industrial / Organizational psychology, one of the most researched areas is therelationship between job satisfaction and work performance (Judge, Thoresen, Bono, & Patton,2001). Landy (1989) described this relationship as the Holy Grail of Industrial psychology.Research linking job performance with satisfaction and other attitudes has been studied since atleast 1939 with the Hawthorne studies (Roethlisberger & Dickson, 1939). In Judge et al. (2001),it was found by Brayfield and Crockett (1955) that there is only a minimal relationship between

job performance and job satisfaction. However, since 1955 Judge et al. (2001) cited that there areother studies by Locke (1970), Schwab & Cummings (1970), and Vroom (1964) that have shownthat there is at least some relationship between those variables. Iffaldano and Muchinsky (1985)

did an extensive analysis on the relationship between job performance and job satisfaction.There are also strong relationships depending on specific circumstances such as mood andemployee level within the company (Morrison, 1997). Organ (1988) also found that the job

performance and job satisfaction and job performance relationship follows the social exchangetheory; employees performance is giving back to the organization from which they get their satisfaction.

Judge et al. (2001) argued that there are seven different models that can be used to describe the job satisfaction and job performance relationship. Some of these models view the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance to the unidirectional, that either job satisfaction

causes job performance or vice versa. Another model stated that the relationship is a Personalityand Job Reciprocal one; this has been supported by the research of Wanous (1974). Theunderlying theory of this reciprocal model is that if the satisfaction is extrinsic, then satisfactionleads to performance, but if the satisfaction is intrinsic then the performance leads to satisfaction.Other models suggest that there is either an outside factor that causes a seemingly relationship

between the factors of that there is no relationship at all. However , neither of these models havemuch research.


7/34


8/34

30


amount of effort that culminates in high performance levels, he will perceive that he deserves asubstantial reward (Dipboye, Smith, and Howell. 1994).

2.2.2 Comparison Theory:Lawler (1973) in Dipboye, Smith and Howell (2000) incorporated the concepts of attained versus

described needs in his model of facet satisfaction. This model is an extension of the Porter-Lawler (1968) of motivation explained above. It is a facet satisfaction model because satisfactionwith various components or facets of a job, such as supervision, pay, or the work itself, isconsidered. Lawlers model specifies that workers compare what their jobs should provide interm of job facets, such as promotions and pay, to what they currently from their jobs. However,simple need comparison theory is extended by also weighing the influence of certain worker characteristics (such as skills, training, and age) and job characteristics (such as degree of responsibility and difficulty). In addition the model draws concepts from the equity theory of motivation by assuming that workers ultimately determine their job satisfaction by comparingtheir relevant job inputs and outputs to referent (comparison) other (Dipboye, Smith and Howell,2000).

Simple interpretation of the facet model of satisfaction is that:

o If the employee perceives that the amount that should be received (A) is equal to theamount received (B), the worker will be satisfied or happy

o If the employee perceives that the amount that should be received (A) is greater then theamount received (B) the worker will be dissatisfied of unhappy

o If the employee perceives that the amount that should be received (A) is smaller than theamount received (B) the worker will feel guilty, uncomfortable because of perceivedinequality.

2.2.3 Opponent Process Theory:An other interesting theory of job satisfaction is that of Landy (1978) which hypothesizes that

job attitudes emanate from a person physiological state opponent process theory assumes thatwhen you experience an extreme emotional state, central nervous system mechanism attempts to

bring you back to a state of emotional equilibrium or neutrality. In returning to neutrality, theemotional state may even surpass equilibrium and progresses to the opposite emotional state. For example when you were first appointed to your job, you probably felt happy even elated. This

positive emotional state waned over time to a neutral state or perhaps to a slightly depressed or a

unhappy state. Opponent processes theory presents an intriguing explanation of why job attitudeschange over time and why workers may become bore with jobs they once found satisfied. It doesnot explain, however, why some workers are continually either very satisfied or dissatisfied withtheir jobs the theory has also not been empirically tested, so we cant judge whether it is a viabletheory of job satisfaction (Dipboye, Smith and Howell, 2000)


9/34


10/34

30


There are certain basic strategies, through the mix in the final recipe will vary from workplacesituation to situation. Essentially, there is a gap between an individuals actual state and somedesired state the manager tries to reduce this gap.

Motivation is, in effect, a means to manipulate and reduce this gap. It is inducing others in aspecific way towards goals specifically stated by the motivator. Naturally, these goals mustconform to the corporate policy of the organization. The motivational system must be tailored tothe situation and to the organization.

2.3.2 How can we Achieve Exceptional EmployeePerformance?

The first thing to remember is that employee performance does not occur in a vacuum. We have

to take a systems perspective and look not only at our employees, but also at the environments inwhich we expect them to perform.

It has been said that if we put good performance in bad systems, the system will win every time.We know that behavior in every facet of our lives is a function not only of the person, but also of the environment-more specifically of the interaction of the person and the environment.Behaviors at work then are a function of the interaction of the employees (with their personfactors) and the work environment (all the organizational systems factors). And it is behavior that leads to performance.

A. Yesterdays Solution: Fix the Employees:

Yesterdays solution to the issue of employee performance was simple: Fix the employees!The focus was on the immediate problem and the solution was either training or discipline.

As we grew a bit more sophisticated we became more proactive and got ahead of the curve byinstituting performance management systems that often provided for goal setting and

performance appraisal processes which gave a more rational and defensible basis for training anddiscipline. We also implemented careers planning and development systems, which gave us moreof a future focus, and changed the name of the Training and Development function to HumanResource Development to reflect the broader scope.

B. Todays Solution:

Today, we are generally doing a better job. We recognize and deal with most of the hygienefactors fair pay, reasonable benefits, clean and safe working conditions, etc. These areimportant there is no question that they are necessary for improving employee performance for fairly obvious reasons. To use simplistic examples, employee performance improvementinterventions may not stand much of a chance if employees are really annoyed because we did a


11/34


poor job of implementing a benefits change or if they are preoccupied with work schedules theyconsider unfair.

This is a big step beyond yesterdays solution of fix the employee with training and discipline.The competency area currently tested by the Human Resource Certification Institute (HRCI)

reflects this broad area of knowledge. These areas truly are a critical foundation for improvedemployee performance, but they are not also enough. We must do more. We are looking at

personal system factors outside of work as they impact employees, but still not looking hardenough at the system factors at work.

C. Tomorrows Solution:

A relatively simple but highly effective way of looking at this issue was provided by TomGilbert 1994, who developed a diagnostic tool called the Behavior Engineering Model (BEM).There are other approaches but the BEM will serve as a good example. It looks at the followingsix areas:

1. Information2. Resources3. Incentives4. Skills and Knowledge5. Capacity6. Motivation

Lets look at each of these in a bit more detail. Information is critical for obvious reasons. Itstarts with output specifications. People have to know what they are expected to produce. They

need to get a feedback. They need to be aware of policy and procedures and the reasons for these policies and procedures, and so on. Resources, again is fairly obvious. No matter how skilled anemployee without the tools and materials (and information can overlap with resources here)needed to do the job, it probably isnt going to get done. The best welder in the world cannotweld without a torch. The issue of incentives is a bit more complex, but boils down to this. In thework environment, are these truly incentives for good performance and truly consequences for

poor performance? Often we end up in effect, punishing our best performers. They get all thetough jobs because we know we can count on them and the poor performers get the easier work.

Skills and knowledge is certainly a familiar area. People have to know how to do their jobs.

Capacity is important for obvious reasons also. No matter how committed the employee, if wehire someone 510 to guard an NBA center in the low post, he isnt going to get the job done.Motivation is important also, a strictly person based definition of performance is that

performance is a function of motivation and ability. We can work on the ability, its harder towork on motivation because it is so internal to the individual, but we can work on theenvironment and make sure we remove the barriers to performance. Gilbert also developed a list


12/34


13/34


traditional HR area of expertise. Rather, they should be true business partners, stay with the people with the problem, help find the expertise needed and ensure the solution is designed andimplemented in such a way that it leverages our employees capabilities.

2.5 Sett ing expectat ions to increase motivation andperformance:

To increase the motivational level following steps should be taken;

o Reconcile Job and Task Expectationso Work together to decide how expectations will be monitoredo Work together to decide what the positive and not so positive consequences should be if

employee exceeds, meets or does not meet expectationso Building competence: How do I do it?o Giving feedback: How am I doing?o Providing support: Will I succeed?o Rewards: Whats in it for me?


14/34

30


3 FINDINGS & ANALYSIS

In an order to study the relationship between Job Satisfaction & Job performance, we conduct asurvey in various Telecommunication Companies, NGOs & Construction companies inIslamabad. To make a clear picture of it, we divide the Job Satisfaction into three elements:

Task Satisfaction Employee Satisfaction Market Satisfaction

Task satisfaction comes from performing the tasks required of the job. Increasing a person's

salary may make an undesirable task more bearable, but it doesn't necessarily make it moreenjoyable.

Employment satisfaction consists of elements such as personnel policies, benefits, career opportunities, work environment, style of management, fit in the organization, etc. Many of theseelements are within the company's control; others are not. For example, there may be very littlethat a company can do for an employee who does not get along with his/her peers. The employer can try to assure that all individuals are treated professionally, but the company cannot make thecoworkers become close friends.

Market satisfaction is comprised of forces external to the company that affect the individual's

job. Political situations and public laws can easily affect job satisfaction. An individual may beunhappy because of some environmental factor but the company cannot waive the requirement toimprove an individual's job satisfaction. In most cases, market satisfaction will be consistentacross the job market; the same external forces will be present even if the employee changesemployers. However there are differences in the external forces affecting jobs within thegovernment and those within the private sector.


15/34


Keeping in mind these basic elements of Job Satisfaction, we prepared a Questionnaire andconduct a study. The analyses of these questionnaires are:

3.1 Communication of Goals & StrategiesMore than 80% of the employees show complete satisfaction regarding the communication of goals & strategies in the Company. The findings also display two outcomes, firstly, the companyis focused on communicating its goals and objectives throughout the Organization & secondly, itshows the employees level of interest by working accordingly to achieve the Companys goals.

Does the company communicates its goals and strategies to you?

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

PercentValid Very

Dissatisfied 1 2.5 2.5 2.5

Not Satisfied 3 7.5 7.5 10.0

SomewhatSatisfied 19 47.5 47.5 57.5

Satisfied 17 42.5 42.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

P e r c e n t

3.2 Communication & Information Flow


16/34

30


Most of the employees are quite content with the communication and information flow in theCompany. This shows that there is an efficient system of information flow within theOrganization. The Company works on an Intranet Application so that the information is readilyavailable throughout the different levels of the Organization.

Are you satisfied with the communication and information flow of your organization?


PercentValid Somewhat


Not Satisfied 3 7.5 7.5 10.0SomewhatSatisfied 29 72.5 72.5 82.5

Satisfied 7 17.5 17.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

20

40

60

80

P e r c e n t

3.3 Communication & Interpersonal relat ionshipPeople enjoy their work if they are having good interpersonal relationships with those peoplewhom they are working with. They may be their colleagues, their subordinates or supervisors.Thus, building a strong interpersonal relationship is very important to increase Job Satisfaction.The results from our survey show that more than 70% of the employees believe that a strongworking relationship exist in the Organization.

Are you satisfied with the communication and interpersonal relationship in your organization?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

PercentValid Not Satisfied 8 20.0 20.0 20.0


Satisfied 9 22.5 22.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0


17/34


20

30

40

50

60

P e r c e n t

3.4 Interaction with other employeesOne of the most effective ways of achieving goals is to determine that how much the employeesare interacted with one another. The result shows that around 70% of the employees are givenvarious opportunities to interact with one another. These opportunities are group meetings,seminars, & other get together activities. The purpose of the gathering is to have a formal talksand discussions over various issues and problems which the employees face during their work.

Do you receive enough opportunities to interact with other employees on a formal level?


PercentValid Very



Satisfied16 40.0 40.0 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

20

30

40

P e r c e n t

3 .5 Value o f Effor tThe employees get more committed and dedicated towards their work if their efforts in achievingthe Organizational Goals are valued. They feel their presence and importance in the Company


18/34

30


which ultimately affects the overall satisfaction level of the employees. The results have shownthat more than 80% of the employees are happy with the outcome of their efforts.

Does your effort sin achieving the goals valued?




Satisfied 7 17.5 17.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

20

40

60

80

P e r c e n t

3.6 Degree of Mot ivat ionEmployees should feel motivated in the jobs they are performing at the workplace. The degree of motivation is achieved through many ways, that is, interaction with others, job security, personalgrowth and other factors. The analysis of our survey shows that 27.5% of the employees are nothappy in performing their tasks and only 15% showed that they enjoy their work. The majorityof the employees do not have any say about it.

Degree of motivation as far as the job is concerned?



Satisfied 5 12.5 12.5 12.5


Satisfied 6 15.0 15.0 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0


19/34


0

10

20

30

40

50

P e r c e n t

3.7 Level of Job Secur ityOne of the key elements for employees to perform well is the level of security they feel withtheir position in the Company. If an employee is under the impression that he might get shifted toanother position or even might get fired, it is going to affect his/her performance in a negative

manner. The results have shown that around 50% of the employees are not feeling secured abouttheir position in the company. Practically speaking, this percentile is quite high for any company.The figure also tells that the employees who are working at the middle and lower levels are theone that are feeling insecure about their job positions.

Level of job security?




Not Satisfied 21 52.5 52.5 60.0SomewhatSatisfied 9 22.5 22.5 82.5Satisfied 7 17.5 17.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

2030

40

50

60

P e r c e n t

3.8 Methodology of Implementing ChangeThe successful Organizations use various methods and tools to successfully implement thechange in their businesses. Though a change is continuous, the implementation should be a


20/34

30


steady process for it to be effectively implemented. The overall result of 42.5% NOTSATISFIED shows that the employees are not quite content with the methods by which thechange is being implemented at the workplace.

Methodology by which change is implemented in organization?





Total 40 100.0 100.0

20

30

40

50

60

P e r c e n t

3.9 Performance of TasksAnother key aspect to show a correlation between Performance and Satisfaction is to evaluate theways and manners of performing tasks which the employees practice. If the employees are

provided effective ways of doing their task, that is going to increase their performance at work.The findings have shown that around 25% of the employees are not satisfied with the ways they

perform their responsibilities, which clearly shows one thing that most of these employees are performing at the lower level and they are lacking equipments, resources or other accessories todo their tasks.

The manner of tasks you are required to perform?


PercentValid .00 1 2.5 2.5 2.5


Satisfied 6 15.0 15.0 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0


21/34


10

20

30

40

50

60

P e r c e n t

3.10 Personal Growth & DevelopmentAn employee feel encouraged to perform if he/she has given the opportunity of personal growthand development in the Organization. The percentile of 35% clearly shows that the career growthopportunities are not uniformly distributed throughout the Organization.

The extent to which personal growth and development is possible?





Satisfied 5 12.5 12.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

20

30

40

50

60

P e r c e n t

3.11 Conflict resolutionIt is a common practice that the employees face issues working with one another. Successfulorganizations follow effective methods of conflict resolution to overcome these issues. Seriousconflicts may lead to job dissatisfaction and ultimately resulting in decreasing the overallemployees performance. Through the surveys which we have conducted, we found that around40% of the employees are not satisfied with the conflict resolution methods being practiced attheir workplace.


22/34

30


The methods of conflict resolution in your organization?





Satisfied 5 12.5 12.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

20

30

40

50

P e r c e n t

3.12 Util izat ion of Skil lsEmployees in any Organization feel pride in themselves if their skills are properly utilized. Theforemost and important thing for this to happen is to have right people at the right place. Fromthe survey, we found that 22.5% of workforce is not able to utilize their skills completely and57.5% are those employees who have an ambiguity over it, only 12.5% are those workers who

feel that their skills are properly utilized.Degree to which your skills are utilized?





Satisfied 5 12.5 12.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0


23/34


20

30

40

50

60

P e r c e n t

3.13 Flexibil i ty al lowedFlexibility in the working environment keeps the employees in a positive frame of mind. Theresults from the research concluded that 32.5% of the employees feel that they are given freehand at work. On the other hand, 27.5% are those employees who do not feel flexible in their work.

Flexibility and independance allowed?



Disatisfied 2 5.0 5.0 5.0


Satisfied 13 32.5 32.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

10

20

30

40

P e r c e n t

3.14 Climate of the WorkplaceThe overall climate of the Organization depends on the relationship of employees, performanceof tasks, access of knowledge and various other factors as well. The results have shown that themajority of the employees are quite satisfied with the overall climate of their workplace.

Are you satisfied with the over all climate of the organization?


24/34


25/34


10

20

30

40

50

P e r c e n t

3.16 Quanti ty of work ExpectedThe employees performance ultimately degrades if he/she is given a load of work. Thinkingfrom an employees perspective, an employee will feel that he/she is not efficient at the work which demoralizes him/her. The results display a balanced outcome from the survey weconducted. 22.5% are not satisfied with the amount of work they are doing, while a healthy

percentile is quite satisfied about it.

The quantity of work allocated / expected to you?




Satisfied 8 20.0 20.0 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

30

40

50

60

3.17 Free Hand at WorkIf the employees are given free hand at work, they are more promising in performing their duties.In other words, we can say that the employees feel the responsibility in achieving the set targets.This factor thus lead to increase in Job satisfaction and hence performance. From our findings,25% of the employees are dissatisfied, and a small figure of 7.5% shows thesatisfaction level.

Degree to which you feel extended to your job?


26/34

30





Satisfied3 7.5 7.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

010203040506070

P e r c e n t

3.18 Physical working condit ionsFor employees to perform well, they should have a good environment and conditions to work on.As mentioned earlier, it is very important to provide the employees the required resources as wellas a healthy working environment. The results show that the employees are very satisfied withtheir working conditions. Only 5% showed a dissatisfaction level.

Are you satisfied with the physical working conditions?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

PercentValid Not Satisfied 2 5.0 5.0 5.0SomewhatSatisfied 25 62.5 62.5 67.5

Satisfied 13 32.5 32.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

20

30

40

50

60

70

P e r c e n t


27/34


3.19 Workplace DiscriminationEmployees feel discourage at work, if they experience any discrimination, either gender,educational background, linguistic or race. Successful organizations always try to eliminate anydiscrimination they may experience at the workplace. From our survey, we concluded thatmajority of the employees do not feel any discrimination at their jobs. Although 20% of them do

feel that there is discrimination, but that figure can be easily overcome by organizing activitieswithin the organization.

Individual differences like gender, educational background, and race are respected in your organization?


PercentValid Very


SomewhatDissatisfied 1 2.5 2.5 7.5

Not Satisfied 8 20.0 20.0 27.5Somewhat

Satisfied16 40.0 40.0 67.5

Satisfied 13 32.5 32.5 100.0Total 40 100.0 100.0

10

20

30

40

P e r c e n t

From the analysis of the survey, we find out that all the three elements play an important role inevaluating the overall Job Satisfaction level of the employees. Though, some factors are moreconvincing than the others. That is why; the overall result shows a different picture, for example,if an employee is satisfied with his salary, it does not mean that he is also satisfied with his job.There are other factors which come into play when we talk about the term Job Satisfaction, i.e.the working conditions, personal growth, utilization of skills and all others mentioned above. Butone thing is clear from this survey, that all these factors of Job Satisfaction do affect the

performance of the employees either directly or indirectly.


28/34

30



29/34


4 PROPOSED MODEL FOR THE RESEARCH STUDY

To begin our findings, let us again divide job satisfaction as a combination of three elements.These all three elements have been used collectively in our survey.

1. Task Satisfaction2. Employment Satisfaction3. Market Satisfaction

The diagram in Figure below illustrates the simple correlation between job satisfaction and job performance. The theory is that the employee's performance is in direct correlation to their satisfaction; improve their satisfaction and you will improve their performance.

4.1 Our Proposed Model P&S MODEL (P: Performance and

S: Satisfaction)After conducting our survey and looking at things in a new ways for performance vs.satisfaction, lets start with a very basic view: comparing the satisfaction and performance of aspecific task. We will refer to these as task satisfaction and task performance. Task satisfaction isstrongly influenced by a person's aptitude; it is the satisfaction received by the employee for

performing that specific task.

In the figure below, let us break the relationship of performance and satisfaction into four quadrants to further explore and explain the complexity of the relationship. This figure helps tounderstand the complexity while trying to keep the concept manageable. There are varying

degrees of satisfaction and performance so it is difficult to state exactly where one would drawthe line between high performance and low performance and between high satisfaction and lowsatisfaction. Each person is somewhere along those two lines. We can only try to understandwhat will happen as the employees move along those lines.


30/34

30


Figure: Two Dimensional View of Task Satisfaction vs. Task Performance

The aboveFigure creates

four

quadrants.

High Task Satisfaction and High Task Performance. Low Task Satisfaction and Low Task Performance. High Task Satisfaction and Low Task Performance. Low Task Satisfaction and High Task Performance.

4 .1 .1 H ig h Task Sa ti sf ac ti on an d Hi gh Ta sk Pe rf or ma nc e

This individual loves his/her job. He/she has the aptitude, the skill, and resources necessary to perform the assigned task, and he/she performs the task quite well. A person in this quadrant may become so caught up in his/her task that the person does not realize that he/she has worked pastquitting time.

4 .1 .2 L ow Ta sk Sa ti sf ac ti on an d L ow Ta sk Pe rf or ma nc e

The manager should consider whether or not something is missing. Does the employee lack theaptitude, the skills, or the resources necessary to perform the task well? Being in this quadrantdoes not mean that the employee is not trying! From the employee's perception, the employeemay be expending a great deal of effort in trying to complete the task. The employee may feelthat he/she is doing everything humanly possible and he/she does not understand whymanagement is unhappy with his/her performance. This person may experience very low task satisfaction because he/she finds it difficult or unfavorable to perform the task. This person may


31/34


be a clock-watcher, never arriving early or staying late without being mandated andcompensated.

4 .1 .3 L ow Ta sk Sa ti sf ac ti on an d H ig h Task Pe rf or ma nc e

This person is indicating that they would rather be doing another job, but at the same time their personal values are such that they are giving this task their best effort. A company should think that this is a person they want to keep. It may well be worth the companys effort to look atdeveloping a graceful transition plan that would allow this individual to move to another positionwhile minimizing the impact to your present operations.

4 .1 .4 H ig h Task Sa ti sf ac ti on an d L ow Ta sk Pe rf or ma nc e

From a positive viewpoint, a person in this quadrant loves his/her work but he/she is not performing as expected. The employee may find it hard to quit working on a task knowing thathe/she can always make it better (i.e., a perfectionist that never finishes his task). Or, the person

may enjoy what he/she is doing but lacks the aptitude, skill, or other resources necessary to dothe task quickly.


32/34

30


5 CONCLUSION

The Model shows that if the person's aptitude is such that they enjoy the tasks and they have theskills to perform the tasks, then they have the potential of being in the high satisfaction and high

performance quadrant. If the basic needs are not met, then increasing the person's salary is notgoing to improve performance.

If a person should be in the high task satisfaction and high task performance quadrant and theyare not performing as expected then the question is one of choice,

"Why did the employee conscientiously or unconscientiously chose to move towards the left(decreased performance) in Figure?"

The answer is quite simple; factors influencing the person's conscious or unconsciousmovements along the performance line include those which are related to employmentsatisfaction and market satisfaction.

Though it has been shown in our research that there exists a relationship between JobSatisfaction and Job Performance, we will never be able to pinpoint an exact correlation between

job satisfaction and performance that will work in every situation. Doing a job well may improve job satisfaction, being satisfied may encourage a person to try harder, and each person's personalvalue system will have an effect on how he/she reacts to motivators and impediments. The bestwe can do is try to understand that performance is a complex issue, and recognize where we havecontrol to address issues affecting an individual's performance.


33/34


6 BIBLIOGRAPHY

o Alderfer, P, 1969, An empirical test of a new theory of human needs.

Organizational Behavior and Performance, 142-175.

o Alexander, C. 2000, Organization Behavior, London.

o Arvey, Richard D., L. M. Abraham, T.J. Bocahrd, & N. L. Segal. 1989, Job

Satisfaction: Environment and Genetic Components, Journal of Applied

Psychology.

o Amsden, A.H, 1994, a Review of the World Bank East Asia Study, World

Development, pp.627-633.

o Barber AE & Bretz RD, Jr, 2000, Compensation attraction, and retention. In

Rynes SL.

o Beck, R.C, 1994, Motivation: Theories and Principles. (2 nd ED.) Englewood

Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

o Berkowitz, L., Fraser, C., Treasure, P, & Cochran, S, 1987. Pay equity, job

gratifications and comparisons in pay level satisfaction, Journal of the

applied Psychology, 72, 544-551.

o Blau, Gary, 1994, Testing the effect of level and Importance of Pay Referents

on Pay Level Satisfaction Humans Relations 47:1251-68.o Blau, P. M, 1964, Exchange and power in Social Life, New York.

o Bordia, P., & Blau G, 1998, Pay referent comparison and pay level

satisfaction.

o Bretz RD, Jr, Thomas SL. (1992). Perceived equity, motivation, and final offer

arbitration in major league baseball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 280-

287.

o Herzberg, F. 1968, One more time: How do you motivated employees?

Harvard Business Review, Vol. 46, iss. 1, pp. 53-62.o Taylor, G. S, & Vest, M.J. 1992. Pay comparison and pay satisfaction among

public sector employees. Public Personnel Management, 21, 445-445.

o Vroom, V. H, 1995, Work and Motivation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Publishers.


34/34

erm - research report

Documents