ergonomic assessment of design features of school bags

73
Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags Group Members Alaa Alawneh Dana Jaber Saja Mlitat Wesal Salameh Supervised By Dr. Yahya Saleh

Upload: maili

Post on 26-Feb-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags. Group Members Alaa Alawneh Dana Jaber Saja Mlitat Wesal Salameh. Supervised By Dr. Yahya Saleh. Introduction. General Background . Problem Definition . Objectives . Literature Review. International Studies . Regional Studies . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Group MembersAlaa AlawnehDana JaberSaja MlitatWesal Salameh

Supervised By Dr. Yahya Saleh

Page 2: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Literature Review

Introduction

General Background

Problem Definition

Objectives

Regional Studies

International Studies

Page 3: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Methodology

Study Design

Inclusion Criteria

exclusion Criteria

Questionnaire

Limitations of study

Page 4: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Results & calculations

The Project sample

Minitab Analysis & Results

General Descriptive Results

Conclusion & Recommendation

Page 5: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Introduction

Page 6: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

General Background

It was and still is of great concern the relation between back pain and school bags.

In this study, we are also concentrating on the issue of children health through their developmental years in regards of holding school bags on their backs and causing what is called (backpack syndrome).

Page 7: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

There is particular concern for the junior students in secondary schools, as the spine is at a critical stage of development in children between 12 – 14 years of age.

This is also the stage at which the bag weight to body weight ratio is likely to be high as some students are still quite small but carry loads similar to larger and older children.

Page 8: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Problem Definition Back packs are used by the school-age students to carry school books, supplies, other articles, and equipment. Students often carry between ( 3-5 kg) on their backs to and from school and between classes .

In order to better understand abnormalities or health problems related to spine in children we need to be aware of some basic spinal anatomy.

Page 9: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

The back is an intricate structure of bones, muscles, and other tissues that form the posterior part of the trunk from the neck to the pelvis; the spine which is the most important support of the back has three major components.

Page 10: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

The spinal column (i.e., bones and discs).Neural elements (i.e., the spinal cord and nerve roots).Supporting structures (e.g., muscles and ligaments).

When we stand, the weight of our body must be transmitted through the spinal column to the hips and ultimately to the lower limbs. Yet most of our body weight lies anterior to the spinal column.

Page 11: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags
Page 12: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Backpack syndromecharacteristics of backpack syndrome:

Poor posture.

Headache, fatigue, or both.

Low back pain that may become chronic.

Discomfort, pain, or both in the shoulder and neck.

Muscle spasms of neck and shoulders.

Pressure sores or blisters of the back or shoulders from straps or inappropriately packed objects.

Page 13: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Healthy ConcernsAdverse Effects May cause long-term health problems resulting from neck, shoulder and back pain, as well as fatigue.

Poor posture and pain resulting from leaning forward with neck thrust forward.

Shoulder and arm strain from dragging back pack.

Strain and stress on one side of the body curved by using only one shoulder strap.

Page 14: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Schoolbag risk factors

Risk factors for adverse effects on the spine include:

A schoolbag that weighs more than 10 per cent of the child’s weight.

Holding the bag in one hand by its straps.

Carrying the bag over one shoulder.

An incorrectly packed backpack.

An incorrectly fitted backpack

Page 15: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags
Page 16: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags
Page 17: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Design and Portage of Backpack While examining the school bags design, we should have a look at three components : The back of the bag should be firm and padded to prevent and adequately reduce the pressure on the child’s back, and the level of the back should be adjusted to the child back.

The straps should be padded and adjustable.

The handles should be smooth and comfortable for handling without any rough edges or sharp angles.

Page 18: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags
Page 19: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Significance of Study

We can clearly notice the growing weight of school bags and its effects on health of the children that has become a matter of serious concern for every parent, schools, and authorities.

We find it of equal importance too to determine children’s opinion on their individual daily school bag load. Up to my knowledge, no study in Palestine has evaluated the influence of backpack on student’s backs before, we also found that we have a huge number of school students, for these reasons we were encouraged to perform this study.

Page 20: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Statistical information from the ministry of higher education:

Basic education / compulsory: student starts entering the first grade primary from the age of 5 years and 6 months. And which will last for a period of ten years; until the end of the tenth grade (compulsory).

Distribution of basic school students by sex and class in all the supervisory authorities:

Class level

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sum

Males 55860 52216 51140

51893 51762 48038

46954

44547

42934

40954

486298

Females 52611 49433 47737

50478 49625 46748

46399

45621

45782

46568

481002

Sum 108471

101649

98877

102371

101387

94786

93353

90168

88716

87522

967300

Page 21: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Distribution of basic school students by Supervising Authority

Page 22: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Objectives Main Objectives

Assessing the effect of design features of school bags on health of students.

Specific objectives

To identify the methods of carrying school backpacks.To measure mean backpack weight and backpack weight to student's weight ratio.To do some calculations of the bags features.To give some tips about the most appropriate way of bag handling.

Page 23: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Literature review

Page 24: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

International study

Page 25: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags
Page 26: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Regional Study

Page 27: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Methodology

Page 28: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Steps of conducted study

Collect the ideas.

Determine the aims.

Translate our view through questionnaire.

Coordination with ministry of education in Nablus to visit schools in formal way.

Page 29: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Data collection

Data collection was accomplished through two steps.

First Step:

Measuring the height of each student.Measuring the body weight of each student and their school bag(empty and full).

Second Step:

Each student was interviewed to answer the questionnaire.(This method was only used for grades first to sixth).

In secondary schools(seventh to tenth grades) completed the questionnaire themselves .

Page 30: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Inclusion Criteria

First to tenth grade students in participating schools conditioned to be (6-15) years old.

Male and female students.

Generally healthy students

Page 31: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Exclusion Criteria

The researcher excluded Students: Who are not carrying or unable to carry school bag.Who have disabilities and health problems.Who are unable to provide data sufficiently.Above fifteen or below six years old.

Page 32: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

QuestionnaireA structural questionnaire that contains close-ended questions contained two sections:

The first section contains personal details including age, gender, stages, method of travelling to schools, weight of students, weight of school bags, full and empty, and height of student).

The second section contains data related to: Properties of the School bag. The method of carrying school bag.What are side effects? Health questions.What the best way to solve the problem of healthy bags?

Page 33: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Limitations of Study

The difficulty of choosing students because of the midterm exam.

The teachers were on strike.

Some selected schools don’t have the classes that the study needs

Page 34: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Results and Calculations

Page 35: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

The Project SampleSo we decided to calculate the sample population which can cover our study by using a standard model from the internet as this figure shown:

Then we divided this” 1000 “student sample on the school types in order to the percentage of each from the total as this table shown

Page 36: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

General Descriptive Results for the whole sample

As we see from this table we have a maximum weight ratio of 0.27 >>> 0.1!! higher than the standard .

Page 37: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

FrequenciesThe most important results of the frequencies that student answered with an end answers are concluded here through bar charts and tables :

Page 38: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Place Of Bags Manufacturing

Page 39: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Main way of schoolbag backing

Page 40: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

School Arriving Way

Page 41: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Bag Selection Criterion

Page 42: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Feelings towards the bag

Page 43: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Body Pain Distribution

Page 44: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Solutions Proposed By Students

Page 45: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Minitab Analysis Using Minitab, Two sample –t test

Student’s weight ratio was inserted in two column based on gender factor. H0: µ= .1 and H1: µ > .1 and α=.05 .

Reject H0 if the P-value is < .05.

if we reject H0, we can conclude that there is a significant difference between genders.

Page 46: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Normality testDuring analysis, the null hypothesis H0: normal

the alternative hypothesis H1: not normal .

P- value > 0.05 we accept H0 normally distributed.

P- value <0 .05 we rejectH0 not normally distributed.

Non parametric method Wilcoxon signed-rank test.(Test assumption is symmetric continuous distribution).

Page 47: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Normality test output

Page 48: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

m

Perc

ent

0.250.200.150.100.050.00

99.9

99

959080706050403020105

1

0.1

Mean

0.262

0.1071StDev 0.04221N 63AD 0.454P-Value

Probability Plot of mNormal

Normal probability plot of males in the governmental schools level (1).

Page 49: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Normal probability plot of females in the governmental schools level (1).

f

Perc

ent

0.250.200.150.100.050.00

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.081

0.115StDev 0.03908N 58AD 0.660P-Value

Probability Plot of fNormal

Page 50: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

m

Perc

ent

0.200.150.100.050.00

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.234

0.1046StDev 0.03995N 28AD 0.466P-Value

Probability Plot of mNormal

Normal probability plot of males in the private schools level (1).

Page 51: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

m

Perc

ent

0.1750.1500.1250.1000.0750.050

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.687

0.106StDev 0.02881N 5AD 0.216P-Value

Probability Plot of mNormal

Normal probability plot of males in UNRWA schools level (1).

Page 52: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

f

Perc

ent

0.2000.1750.1500.1250.1000.0750.050

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.213

0.116StDev 0.02881N 5AD 0.400P-Value

Probability Plot of fNormal

Normal probability plot of females in UNRWA schools level (1).

Page 53: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

m

Perc

ent

0.200.150.100.050.00

99.9

99

959080706050403020105

1

0.1

Mean

0.091

0.0985StDev 0.03151N 60AD 0.639P-Value

Probability Plot of mNormal

Normal probability plot of males in the governmental schools level (2).

Page 54: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

m

Perc

ent

0.160.140.120.100.080.060.040.02

99

9590

80706050403020

10

5

1

Mean

0.384

0.08714StDev 0.02585N 14AD 0.365P-Value

Probability Plot of mNormal

Normal probability plot of males in UNRWA schools level (2).

Page 55: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

f

Perc

ent

0.160.140.120.100.080.060.040.02

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.554

0.09125StDev 0.02588N 8AD 0.275P-Value

Probability Plot of fNormal

Normal probability plot of females in UNRWA schools level (2).

Page 56: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

f

Perc

ent

0.140.130.120.110.100.090.080.070.060.05

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.179

0.0965StDev 0.02033N 20AD 0.506P-Value

Probability Plot of fNormal

Normal probability plot of females in the private schools level (3).

Page 57: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

m

Perc

ent

0.140.120.100.080.060.040.02

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.809

0.083StDev 0.02497N 10AD 0.209P-Value

Probability Plot of mNormal

Normal probability plot of males in UNRWA schools level (3).

Page 58: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

f

Perc

ent

0.200.150.100.05

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.015

0.1082StDev 0.03335N 34AD 0.938P-Value

Probability Plot of fNormal

Normal probability plot of females in the private schools level (1).

Page 59: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

f

Perc

ent

0.200.150.100.050.00

99.9

99

959080706050403020105

1

0.1

Mean

0.008

0.09122StDev 0.03018N 123AD 1.080P-Value

Probability Plot of fNormal

Normal probability plot of females in the governmental schools level (2).

Page 60: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

m

Perc

ent

0.250.200.150.100.050.00

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.041

0.1178StDev 0.04610N 27AD 0.763P-Value

Probability Plot of mNormal

Normal probability plot of males in the private schools level (2).

Page 61: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

f

Perc

ent

0.300.250.200.150.100.050.00

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

0.021

0.1243StDev 0.04531N 37AD 0.889P-Value

Probability Plot of fNormal

Normal probability plot of females in the private schools level (2).

Page 62: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

m

Perc

ent

0.160.140.120.100.080.060.040.02

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

<0.005

0.08978StDev 0.02726N 45AD 1.170P-Value

Probability Plot of mNormal

Normal probability plot of males in the governmental schools level (3).

Page 63: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

f

Perc

ent

0.160.140.120.100.080.060.040.020.00

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

<0.005

0.07889StDev 0.02627N 36AD 1.243P-Value

Probability Plot of fNormal

Normal probability plot of females in the governmental schools level (3).

Page 64: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

m

Perc

ent

0.250.200.150.100.050.00

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

<0.005

0.09167StDev 0.04978N 42AD 3.080P-Value

Probability Plot of mNormal

Normal probability plot of males in the private schools level (3).

Page 65: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

f

Perc

ent

0.130.120.110.100.090.080.070.060.050.04

99

9590

80706050403020

105

1

Mean

<0.005

0.08026StDev 0.01585N 38AD 1.320P-Value

Probability Plot of fNormal

Normal probability plot of females in UNRWA schools level (3).

Page 66: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Two –sample t test and CI for males vs. females weight ratio

Tow sample t-test results for males and females weight ratio in the governmental schools level (1).

Page 67: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Conclusion

Page 68: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Heavy school bags are generating a serious problem.

There is an increase in the proportion of the weight of the bag on the weight of the student from the 10% standard ratio, This variance shows clearly in the … stage About the students feeling during carrying schoolbags 7.8% of students feel the bag is light weight50.8% feel it ordinary14.4% feel it heavy weight

So it is a critical problem which should be taken into consideration

Page 69: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Recommendation

Page 70: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Heavy school bags may negatively affect the health of students in many life stages therefore we but many recommended in order to keep their health

1-Recommendations for students and their partners

Choose it right

Choose a backpack with padded shoulder straps.  Choose a backpack with a waist belt.Choose a backpack which has the appropriate size.

Page 71: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

Carry and lift it right

student should use both shoulders.Adjust the shoulder strapsThe bag should lift using both hand and held closest to the body

Pack it right

should only pack with a needed book and other needed items.choose a notebooks and files with Lightweight as possibleBe sure that the items pack in a way that they closest to the child’s back-

Page 72: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags

2-Recommendations for schoolsIncrease the awareness about this issue and corporate with parents effort.Make a lockers for each student in the class.Coordinate with the Ministry of Education about the number and types of books

3-recommendations for parentsShould always direct their children to the correct way of carry the bagEnsure that their children pack only necessary books and itemsMay always ask their children if they feel any fatigue or back painsee doctor if there is any Complaints

Page 73: Ergonomic Assessment Of Design Features Of School Bags