equivalence of different format radar...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY MATRIX ESTIMATION
Riccardo Paladini, Fabrizio Berizzi, Marco Martorella and Amerigo Capria
(1) University of Pisa, VIA CARUSO 16, 56122 PISA, Italy , Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
![Page 2: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OUTLINE
• Introduction• Coherency Matrix T Definition• Data Formats• Coherency Matrix Estimation Algorithms• Equivalence Demonstration• Real Data Analysis • Conclusions
![Page 3: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
INTRODUCTION•• HermitianHermitian Coherency matrix is largely employed for many Coherency matrix is largely employed for many PolPol--SAR application :SAR application :a)a) Speckle FilteringSpeckle Filteringb)b) Detection StudiesDetection Studiesc)c) Classification Classification d)d) Inversion StudiesInversion Studiese)e) InterferometryInterferometry•• Multi look effect have been recently investigated.Multi look effect have been recently investigated.•• Signal formats considered for coherency matrix estimation are heSignal formats considered for coherency matrix estimation are heterogeneous:terogeneous:a)a) Time format (Time format (multilookmultilook averaging processing)averaging processing)b)b) Spatial format (Boxcar filtering)Spatial format (Boxcar filtering)c)c) Hybrid format (Hybrid format (multilookmultilook + Spatial filter)+ Spatial filter)
•• Goal:Goal: Coherency matrix estimation obtained from different four data formats are identical
•• ValidationValidation is performed by real data analysis, in ISAR scenariois performed by real data analysis, in ISAR scenario
![Page 4: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
•• The target 4x4 coherency matrix The target 4x4 coherency matrix TT has been defined by S. R. has been defined by S. R. CloudeCloudeextending the Wiener definition of wave 2x2 coherency matrix :extending the Wiener definition of wave 2x2 coherency matrix :
[ ]2 *
2
*
*
*
* *
*
2
*
*
**
* 2
12 HV
THH HVHV VHHHH H
VHVH
H
VVV
VVV
b S S
b
g S S
g
g
g g g g
r S S
r
r r r r
r
r
S Sn jS jS
S S
n
n
n
n n n n
b b b
b
b
b g
⎡ ⎤= → = = −⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
= = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
= ==+ + +S k
T kk
( )1 b
adt
b a− ∫T = T = T ( )1
1 N
nn
tN =
= ∑T T
•• PolarimetricPolarimetric signals, can be considered random processes, and signals, can be considered random processes, and T elements can be estimated by introducing a time averaging operelements can be estimated by introducing a time averaging operator ator
...
DEFINITION OF THE TARGET COHERENCY MATRIX
![Page 5: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A) Transmitted Signal: Stepped Frequency WaveformsA) Transmitted Signal: Stepped Frequency Waveforms
Target Axis Direction $x
$yz$
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
( )
, ,
cos coscos sin
sin
EL AZ
EL AZ
EL
r x y z
x ry r
z r
ε αε α
ε
⎧ =⎪ =⎨⎪ =⎩
( )( )1sin / cosAZ ELy rα ε−=
( )1sin /EL z rε −=
0
1nf f n f
n N= + Δ
≤ ≤
( )( )
0
0
az k
El k
kα τ α α
ε τ ε
= + Δ
=
tau1 H tau1 V tau2 H tau2 V tau3 H tau3 V
Fmin
Fmax
Time t
Freq
uenc
y f
Time-Frequency behavior of the trasmitted signal
ASSUMPTIONS
( )1
1 N
nn
fN =
= =∑T T
B) Uniform Azimuth sampling and radial motion compensated signaB) Uniform Azimuth sampling and radial motion compensated signalsls
Cross Range imaging is synthesized by Cross Range imaging is synthesized by Fast Fourier Transform Fast Fourier Transform
![Page 6: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
RADAR PARAMETERSCentral Frequency f0 =10 GHz
Frequency Step Δf = 50 MHzTx frequencies for Sweep N = 80
Tx Sweeps for Pol. K = 20
Azimuth Angle +- 5°
Azimut Step δα = 0.5°Tx/Rx Pol. H,V
Range Resolution Δr = 3.75cmCross Range Resolution Δcr = 9 cm
Elevation Angle 16°
Pol-ISAR UWB System in Controlled Environment:4 Combination of elementary targets over Polystyrene Turntable in Anechoic Chamber (CEPAMiR Adelaide)
EXPERIMENTAL REFERENCE DATA
Target Axis Direc�on �x
( )( )1sin / cosAZ ANTENNA ELy rα ε− −5°+0.5°⋅k, k∈[1, 20]= =
�y
z�
( )1 16 (FIXEsin / D)EL Antennaz rε − °= =
( ), ,ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNAA x y z��
( ) ( )( ) ( )
( )2 2 2
cos coscos sin
sin
EL AZ
EL AZ
EL
x Ay A
z A
A r x y z
ε αε α
ε
⎧ =⎪ =⎨⎪ =⎩
= = + +
Turntable Rotation 0.5° for each Tp
![Page 7: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
1 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 2 2
1 2
,
, , . . ,, , . . ,
. . . . .
. . . . ., , . . ,
1 ;1 ; , ; ,
TR n k
TR TR TR K
TR TR TR K
TR N TR N TR N K
S f
S f S f S fS f S f S f
S f S f S f
n N k K T H V R H V
τ
τ τ ττ τ τ
τ τ τ
=
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ = =
( ) ( )( )
( ) ( )( )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
2 1 1 /1
1
1 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 2 2
0 1
, ,
1 ,
, , . . ,, , . . ,
. . . . .
. . . . ., , . . ,
1 ;1 ; , ; ,
TR i k f TR n k
Nj n i N
TR n k i Nn
TR TR TR K
TR TR TR K
TR N TR N TR N K
S r IDFT S f
S f eNS r S r S rS r S r S r
S r S r S r
i N k K T H V R H V
π
τ τ
τ
τ τ ττ τ τ
τ τ τ
− −≤ ≤
=
= =
=
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ = =
∑( ) ( ) ( )( )
( ) ( )( )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
2 1 1 /1
1
1 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 2 2
1 2
, , ,
1 ,
, , . . ,, , . . ,
. . . . .
. . . . ., , . . ,
1 ;1 ; , ; ,
TR i j TR i j i j
Kj k j K
TR i k k Kj
TR TR TR K
TR TR TR K
TR N TR N TR N K
S r Xr DFT S r U r
S r eK
S r Xr S r Xr S r XrS r Xr S r Xr S r Xr
S r Xr S r Xr S r Xr
i N j K T H V R H V
τ
π
τ τ
τ − −≤ ≤
=
= =
=
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ = =
∑
POLARIMETRIC DATA FORMATS
( ) ( ) ( )( )( ) ( )( )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
2 1 1 /1
1
1 1 1 2 1
2 1 2 2 2
1 2
, , ,
1 ,
, , . . ,, , . . ,
. . . . .
. . . . ., , . . ,
1 ;1 ; , ;
TR n j TR n j n j
Kj k j K
TR n j k Kj
TR TR TR K
TR TR TR K
TR N TR N TR N K
S f Xr DFT S f Xr U f Xr
S f Xr eK
S f Xr S f Xr S f XrS f Xr S f Xr S f Xr
S f Xr S f Xr S f Xr
i N j K T H V R
τ
π − −≤ ≤
=
= =
=
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ = =
∑
,H V
Color Coded Raw Samples (f,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
5 10 15 20
9
10
11
12
Color Coded Range Profiles (r,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
5 10 15 20
75
150
225
300
Color Coded Crossrange Profiles ( f,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
-80 -40 0 40 80
9
10
11
12
Color Coded ISAR Images (r ,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
-80 -40 0 40 80
75
150
225
300
Format-I : / frequency time
Format-II : / range time
Format-IV : /frequency crossrange
Format-III : /range crossrange
ReBl
dGreen
ue
H
HV
HH VV
HV
H VVS SS S
S S=⎧ +−
==
+
⎪⎨⎪⎩
![Page 8: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
COHERENCY MATRIX ESTIMATION ALGORITHMS
1.1. Projection of Projection of polarimetricpolarimetric channels on Pauli scattering vector channels on Pauli scattering vector k2.2. Outer Product of scattering vectors (every pixel is represented Outer Product of scattering vectors (every pixel is represented by a Rankby a Rank--1 1 TT matrix)matrix)
3.3. 2D average operation 2D average operation
( )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
1 1
,
1 ,
, , ,
12
, ,
1 ;
,
,
,
,,
1
I HV n k VH n k
N K
I n kn k
Hn k
I HH
I HH n k VV
n k
I n k I n k
I
I HV
VV n
n k VH n k
k
n k
b S
fNK
f f f
n jS f jS f
n N
r S f
k
g S f S ff S f
S f
K
τ
τ
τ τ
τ
τ
τ
τ
τ τ
τ
τ
= =
= =
=
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
= −⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦≤ ≤ ≤ ≤
== −
+
= +
∑∑T T Τ
T k k
k
( )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
1 1
, ,
1 ,
,
, , ,
12
, ,
,,
1 ;1
,
N K
II i ki k
Hi k II i k I
I
II HH
II HH i k VV i k
I HV i
i k VV
I i k
i
II
II HV i k HV i
k H
k
V i
k
k
r S r
rNK
r r r
n jS r jS r
i
gS r
b S r S r
k
r
K
S S
N
r τ ττ τ
τ
τ
τ
τ τ
τ τ
τ
= =
= =
=
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
= −⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦≤ ≤ ≤
= −
≤
= +
= +
∑∑T T T
T k k
k
( )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
1 1
1 ,
, , ,
12
, ,
1 ;
,
, ,
,
, ,
1
III HH i j VV i
III HV i j VH i
N K
III i ji j
H
i j III
III HH i j VV
i j III i j
III
III HV i j
i j
V
j
j
H i j
r S r Xr S r Xr
g S r Xr
r XrNK
r Xr r Xr r Xr
n jS r Xr jS r Xr
i N j
b S r
S r X
Xr S r
K
r
Xr
= =
= =
=
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥=
= +
=
−⎣ ⎦≤ ≤ ≤
= −
≤
+
∑∑T T T
T k k
k
( )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
1 1
,
1 ,
, , ,
12
, ,
,
1 ;1
, ,
,
,IV HV n
N K
III n j
IV HH n j VV n j
IV
n j
H
i j IV n
j V
HH n
j III n j
IV
IV HV n
j VV n
j VH n
n j
j
j
H
r S f
f XrNK
r Xr f Xr f Xr
n jS f Xr
g S f Xr S f X
X
jS f
b S f Xr S f Xr
r S f Xr
Xr
K
r
i N j
= =
= =
=
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥= −
= +
⎣
=
⎦≤ ≤ ≤ ≤
= −
+
∑∑T T T
T k k
k
Color Coded Raw Samples (f,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
5 10 15 20
9
10
11
12
Color Coded Range Profiles (r ,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
5 10 15 20
75
150
225
300
Color Coded Crossrange Profiles ( f,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
-80 -40 0 40 80
9
10
11
12
Color Coded ISAR Images (r,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
-80 -40 0 40 80
75
150
225
300
ALGO-I : /frequency time
ALGO-IV : / frequency crossrange
ALGO-II : /range time ALGO-III : / range crossrange
ReBl
dGreen
ue
H
HV
HH VV
HV
H VVS SS S
S S=⎧ +−
==
+
⎪⎨⎪⎩
![Page 9: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN RANGE AND FREQUENCY AVERAGES
( ) ( )1 1
1 1, k k
N Nk kn nI
n nf f
N Nτ =
=
= == =∑ ∑T Τ Τ
( ) ( )1 1
1 1,N Nk k
II i ik ki i
r rN N
τ=
== =
= = =∑ ∑T T T T
( ) ( )
( )
1 11 1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1 1, ,
1 ,
K K N K Nk kII II i bk k k k
i nk k kK N
Ib kk n
r fK K N K N
fKN
τ τ
τ
=
= == == = =
= =
= = = =
=
∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑
∑∑
T T T T
T T
Color Coded Raw Sam ples [f,τ]
Slow tim e τ [s /PRF]
Fre
que
ncy
f [G
Hz]
5 10 15 20
9
10
11
12
Color Coded Range Profi les [r,τ ]
Slow tim e τ [s /PRF]
Ran
ge H
RR
[cm
]
5 10 15 20
75
150
225
300
- for a single column:ALGO I
- for a single columnALGO II
The two above sentences are equivalent by applying the Bessel –Parseval Theorem to the matrices elements.By averaging K columns of estimates of ALGO-I and ALGO-II, identical coherency matrix are obtained.identical coherency matrix are obtained.
![Page 10: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN CROSS-RANGE AND SLOW TIME AVERAGES
( ) ( )1 1
1 1,K Ki i
II k ki ik k
rK K
τ τ=
== =
= = =∑ ∑T T T T
( ) ( )1 1
1 1,i i K K
III j ji ij j
r Xr XrK K
=
== =
= =∑ ∑T T T
( ) ( ) ( )1 1 1 11 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 , , ,N N K N K K Ni i
II II IIIk j i ji i i ik j i ji i i
r r X r XN N K N K KN
τ τ τ=
= == = = == = =
= = = = =∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑∑T T T T T T
Color Coded Range Profi les [r,τ ]
Slow tim e τ [s /PRF]5 10 15 20
75
150
225
300Color Coded ISAR Im ages [r,Xr]
Cros s Range Xr [cm ]
Range
HR
R [
cm]
-80 -40 0 40 80
75
150
225
300 - for a fixed range binALGO II
- for a fixed range binALGO III
The two above sentences are equivalent by applying the Bessel –Parseval Theorem to the matrices elements.By averaging N rows of estimates of ALGO-II and ALGO-III, identical coherency matrix are obtainedidentical coherency matrix are obtained.
![Page 11: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN THE FOUR DATA FORMATS
( )
( )
1 1
1 1
1 ,
1 ,
N K
K Average n kn k
PARSEVAL
N K
K Average i ki k
fNK
rNK
τ
τ
−= =
−= =
⇔ =
⇔ =
∑∑
∑∑
I
II
T T
T T
c
Color Coded Raw Samples ( f,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
5 10 15 20
9
10
11
12
Color Coded Range Profiles (r ,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
5 10 15 20
75
150
225
300
Color Coded Crossrange Profiles ( f,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
-80 -40 0 40 80
9
10
11
12
Color Coded ISAR Images (r ,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
-80 -40 0 40 80
75
150
225
300
( )1 b
adt
b a− ∫T = T = T
( )
Time-Sampling
1
1 N
nn
tN =
= ∑T T
c
( )
1
1
Stepped Frequency Wavefor
n
m
N
n
fN =
= ∑T T
c
( )1
1PARSEVAL
N
ii
rN =
= ∑T T
c
( )
( )
1 1
1 1
1 ,
1 ,
AZ
AZ
K K
PARSEVAL n jn j
PARSEVAL
N K
PARSE
MOTION
MOTION VAL i ji j
f XrNK
r XrNK
α
α
= =
= =
∧ ⇔ =
∧⇔ ⇔ =
⇔ ∑∑
∑∑
IV
III
T T
T T
c
![Page 12: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF THE THEORY
2
67 3 38 1 7 03 38 74 12 6 0
101 7 12 6 17 0
0 0 0 0
ALGO I ALGO II ALGO III ALGO IV
i ii i
i i
− − − −
−
= = =
− − +⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥− + − −⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥− − +⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
T T T T
T
ReBl
dGreen
ue
H
HV
HH VV
HV
H VVS SS S
S S=⎧ +−
==
+
⎪⎨⎪⎩
Color Coded Raw Samples ( f,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
5 10 15 20
9
10
11
12
Color Coded Range Profiles (r ,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
5 10 15 20
75
150
225
300
Color Coded Crossrange Profiles ( f,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
-80 -40 0 40 80
9
10
11
12
Color Coded ISAR Images (r ,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
-80 -40 0 40 80
75
150
225
300
![Page 13: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS:Equivalence Between different domains of
integration of the signals has been proved in the special case.
A relationship between temporal, spectral and spatial estimate has been traced
, ,
, ,
SFW
M
sampling
n
n K average n k PARSEVAL n j
PARSEVAL PARSEVAL PARSEVAL
i K average i k PARSE
OTION MODEL
MOTION MOD VAL iE jL
t
t
f f f Xr
r r r Xr
τ
τ
−−
− −
⇔ ∧⇔
⇔ ∧⇔
⇔
⇔
c
c
c
c c
Color Coded Raw Samples ( f,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
5 10 15 20
9
10
11
12
Color Coded Range Profiles (r ,τ)
Slow time τ [s/PRF]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
5 10 15 20
75
150
225
300
Color Coded Crossrange Profiles (f,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Fre
quen
cy f
[G
Hz]
-80 -40 0 40 80
9
10
11
12
Color Coded ISAR Images (r,Xr)
Crossrange Xr [cm]
Ran
ge r
[cm
]
-80 -40 0 40 80
75
150
225
300
![Page 14: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
APPLICATION OF THE THEORY:We have been extending the results of our classification schemWe have been extending the results of our classification scheme based on ICTD [1]:e based on ICTD [1]:[1] [1] PaladiniPaladini, , MartorellaMartorella, , BerizziBerizzi, , ““Incoherent ISAR decomposition for target classificationIncoherent ISAR decomposition for target classification””, , Proc. Proc. EuradEurad 2008 Amsterdam.2008 Amsterdam.1)Training is made by windowed ISAR noisy images2) Testing is made with the Pol-ISAR, Pol -HRR, and frequency/time data on AWGN
-10-9.5 -9 -8.5 -8 -7.5 -7-6.5 -6-5.5 -5-4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2-1.5 -1-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Probability of Correct Identification SNR train -2:3:22 dB ISAR MODE
SNR(dB)
ISAR
HRR
F τ
5.41 dB3 dB
T1 T2 T3 T4
Applying A=23 by B=10 pixel window ISAR provides greater performances.
Other data formats work correctly but with lower performances in noisy scenario.
In AWGN ISAR Gain = (NK)/(AB)N/A= 80/23 = 5.41 dBK/B= 20/10 = 3 dB
![Page 15: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Thank you For The Attention!
![Page 16: EQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR …earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2009/participants/114/pres_8_PALADINI_114.pdfEQUIVALENCE OF DIFFERENT FORMAT RADAR POLARIMETRIC DATA FOR COHERENCY](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062601/5d19cce288c993ad0d8c879a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Appendices: A review of Bessel-Parseval Theorem.( ) ( )
( ) *
1
, , , be two complex function of real discrete variablethe complex cross-correlation of the two signals can be evaluated on the range domain:
( ) ( )
The second term can be numericc
i i
N
i i ii
Let x r y r
z r x r y r=
= ∑
( )( ) ( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( ) ( )( )
( )
* 2 1 1 /1
1
* 2 1 1 /1
1
1
ally transformed by means of DFT:1( )
The transformation is reversible by the IDFT:1( )
by substitution we obtain:
( )
Nj i n N
n i i r Ni
Nj i n N
i n n r Nn
i ii
Y f DFT y r y r eN
y r IDFT Y f Y f eN
z r x r
π
π
− −≤ ≤
=
− − −≤ ≤
=
=
= =
= =
=
∑
∑
( )( )
( ) ( )( )
( ) ( )
( )
2 1 1 /*
1 1
2 1 1 /*
1 1 1
* *
1 1
* *
1
1 ( )
by inverting the two series operators:
1( ) ( )
( ) ( )
therefore
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
N Nj i n N
nn i N
N Nj i n N
i n in i f N
N N
n n n nn n
N
i i i n ni n
Y f eN
z r Y f x r eN
Y f X f X f Y f
z r x r y r X f Y f
π
π
− − −
= ≤ ≤
− − −
= = ≤ ≤
= =
=
⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤= =⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦
=
= =
∑ ∑
∑ ∑
∑ ∑
∑1
N
=∑