Is shame a barrier to sobriety? A Narrative Analysis of those in

recovery

Francesca Sawer1, Paul Davis1 and Kate Gleeson1

School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, U.K1

Email addresses: dr_francescasawer@outlook.com

p.e.davis@surrey.ac.uk; kate.gleeson@surrey.ac.uk

Telephone for all authors: 01483 300800

Postal address for all authors: School of Psychology, University of

Surrey, Guildford, U.K

ORCID ID for Paul Davis: orcid.org/0000-002-9796-4601

Abbreviated title: Shame and recovery from alcohol disorders

Word count: 4718

Correspondence to: Paul Davis, School of Psychology, University of

Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK. E-mail: p.e.davis@surrey.ac.uk

1

Is shame a barrier to sobriety? A Narrative Analysis of those in recoveryAbstractAims

Experiencing shame can be a risk factor for relapse for people recovering from

alcohol dependence, but for some it may act as a necessary protective factor for

preventing relapse. Knowing how best to manage shame is therefore an important

issue, yet the precise nature of the relationship between shame and alcohol

dependence remains largely unexplored.

Research Questions

1) In what ways do participants tell their stories of shame?

2) How is shame experienced and/or understood by those in recovery from

alcohol dependence?

Method

Eight participants were recruited from Alcoholic Anonymous (AA) groups and

invited to tell their story of recovery. Stories were then analysed using a narrative

analysis, focusing on how participants narrated their stories and made sense of their

experiences of shame in particular.

Findings

Participants spoke about an inherent deep-rooted negative view about themselves,

which was present long before alcohol dependence developed. Alcohol served as a

means of connection to others and a way of artificially relieving feelings of

worthlessness. Recovery was about finding somewhere safe to talk about feelings of

shame and make sense of these experiences.

Conclusions

The results indicate that management of shame is an important component of recovery

programmes for alcohol dependence.

2

Is shame a barrier to sobriety? A Narrative Analysis of those in

recovery

Introduction

The UK alcohol industry is now worth an estimated £39.9 billion

(International Wine & Spirit Research, 2016) and alcohol is often marketed as a

glamorous product and one that tempts consumers into purchasing. Drinking to excess

on a night out is also a popular recreational and social activity for many in the UK

(Watts, Linke, Murray & Barker, 2015), however there is a very fine line between the

credibility associated with drinking and the negative public perception of the

behaviour of those who drink excessively. Media campaigns targeting ‘problem-

drinking’ tend to have shaming messages attached to them (Watts et al., 2015). Whilst

not everyone who drinks becomes addicted, there is stigma associated with those who

cross the boundary from ‘drinking to excess’ to having an ‘addiction to alcohol’

(Schomerus et al., 2011).

Some psychological theories of alcohol dependence suggest that drinking is a

method of self-medicating to cope with negative emotions (Gelkopf, Levitt & Bleich,

2002), including the emotional pain associated with shame (Potter-Efron, 1987).

Shame is a self-conscious emotion, which typically arises when a person evaluates

themselves through the eyes of another (Lewis, 1995). Shame contributes to feelings

of inferiority and worthlessness (Ramsey, 1987). When a person experiences shame

they perceive themselves as bad, thus the attribution is internal and global and the self

is judged negatively. This contrasts with guilt where a person perceives their

behaviours as bad, thus the behaviour rather than the self is negatively evaluated

(Kim, Thibodeau & Jorgensen, 2011). As such, guilt may motivate reparative actions

including seeking support (Baumeister, Stillwell & Heatherton, 1995), whereas shame

inhibits this and therefore is more frequently linked with psychological distress and ill

health (Gilbert, 2006).

In addition, it is acknowledged that sociological perspectives on shame are of

relevance here. Shame can be viewed as a ‘social emotion’ that arises through

interactions with others and their social worlds (Scheff, 2000) and as such may be

imposed on others, especially already marginalised groups (Chase and Walker, 2013).

3

Regardless of the aetiology of shame, however, research suggests that shame

increases vulnerability to developing an addictive behaviour (Tangney, Wagner &

Gramzow, 1992) and higher shame levels have consistently been reported in those

with drug addictions when compared to other population samples (Meehan et al.,

1996; O’Connor & Weiss, 1993). Higher shame has also been found in people with

anxiety and depression who report using alcohol as a coping strategy (Treeby &

Bruno, 2012).

Evidence also suggests that those who experience shame may experience

anger and depression, in particular self-directed aggression, which can present as the

dangerous use of substances (Tangney, Stuewig, & Mashek, 2007). This may impact

negatively on recovery because drinking is a strategy that temporarily relieves shame,

therefore upon abstinence becomes overwhelming, leading to relapse. Sanders (2011)

found that shame caused distress for women entering recovery and that higher levels

of shame were related to greater chance of relapse. Wiechelt (2007) has suggested that

relapse triggers feelings of inadequacy, which intensifies feelings of shame, thereby

perpetuating a vicious cycle where drinking relieves shame but also reinforces it.

Gilbert (2009) suggested that psychological treatments for mental distress

should support people to develop tolerance to shame. Luoma, Kohlenberg, Hayes and

Fletcher (2012) showed that when participants were given strategies for managing

shame and the perceived judgments of others (in an Acceptance and Commitment

Therapy group), self-reported levels of shame reduced at a four-month follow up.

Therefore, at present there is a paradox in the literature; feelings of shame might be a

hindrance to recovery and are related to relapse, yet a specific focus on managing or

coping with shame can have a positive impact on recovery. It seems that we could

benefit from further exploration of how and why people in recovery from alcohol

dependence experience shame, as this may provide further understanding of how

health care professionals can work effectively with shame in recovery.

Method

Participants

4

Participants were adults (aged 18+) who defined themselves as being ‘in

recovery’ from alcohol dependence. No minimum length of sobriety was specified,

however participants had to recognise their alcohol dependence, be currently abstinent

and be doing something they considered to be ‘recovery’. This was in line with the

AA philosophy of abstinence. Participants using other substances were not excluded

from the study, provided alcohol dependence remained primary. Participants were

five males and three females, aged 27-74, ranging from 21 months to 35 years in

sobriety. All participants were recruited from AA using a snowball sampling method

(Barker, Pistrang & Elliot, 2008).

Procedures

Ethical approval for the study was given by the University of Surrey ethical

review board. All participants were briefed about the study and gave written consent.

Narrative interviews aim to produce detailed accounts rather than brief answers

(Riessman, 2008), therefore an interview schedule was developed which encouraged

detailed stories to be told, rather than a question and answer approach. Prompts

regarding shame were not included in the interview although the participant

information sheet did prime people to the topic.

The interview consisted of one main question, “I would like you to start by

telling me about your personal story of recovery?” followed by additional prompt

questions; for example “Can you tell me about the best/worst times of your

recovery?”

Analysis

Narratives have been claimed to be the principal way that humans give

meaning to experiences (Murray, 2008; Rowe, 1989) and therefore a narrative

analysis was selected to allow for consideration of how participant stories were likely

to have been influenced by other people’s narratives.

A post-modernist position was adopted whereby each narrative was perceived

as a vehicle for participants to talk about their experiences. A structured five-stage

process was used during analysis as described by Crossley, (2000):

Step 1: Reading and familiarising- the first author transcribed all interviews before

familiarising and re-reading each transcript multiple times to gain an overview of the

5

content and structure. Coding notes were then made in relation to general themes,

patterns and language.

Step 2: Identifying narrative tone- The authors reflected on the manner and

‘emotional flavour’ of how each narrative was told and assigned genres to each

narrative, in addition to creating detailed summaries of individual narratives.

Step 3: Identifying imagery and themes-The authors explored themes and images

across the whole narrative to consider changes as the narratives progressed. Any

disagreements between researchers were discussed by revisiting the transcripts and

data.

Step 4: Weaving a coherent story- Having summarised each narrative, narratives were

then put back into a coherent story rather like creating a biography of the participant’s

life, which was grounded in the data and used quotes to demonstrate interpretations.

Step 5: Cross-analysis- Once coherent stories were created for each participant, the

final stage involved looking for commonalities and differences across narratives by

synthesising salient themes, in addition to specifically looking at the ways that shame

was talked about within the narratives.

All participants were given pseudonyms and are referred to as Paula, Dianna,

Michelle, Gary, Raj, James, Matthew and Dean.

Results

In keeping with a narrative analysis and in answer to the first research

question “In what ways do participants tell their stories of shame?” the

results section will begin by describing the narrative techniques that

emerged across participants’ narratives. They will be explored in terms of

how they were understood as methods for talking about shame.

6

To address the second research question “How is shame experienced

and/or understood by those in recovery from alcohol dependence?” a

narrative-thematic analysis is presented that elaborates the emerging

themes and how these relate to shame and recovery.

In what ways do participants tell their stories of shame?

Narrative analysis takes the view that stories are not created in isolation and

that the telling of one’s personal narrative is told and retold over time. It is

constructed and told like a story, which takes on a particular genre. When analysing

the narratives, they all fell into three discrete genres; melodrama, comedy and quest as

summarised in the table below:

Table 1 here.

Genre

In the genres we named melodramas and comedy, it was observed that the

tone was dramatic and detailed descriptions were used to draw the listener into the

story and take them on the highs and lows of the journey.

In Diana’s, Paula’s and Raj’s narratives, there was a high content of over-

exaggerated descriptions of the self, as if talking not about themselves, but a separate

person. This allowed for very honest and dramatic descriptions of memories of their

drinking in quite a sensationalised way that you may typically find in soap operas and

films. By externalising the shame and locating it in a dramatized character, this may

have allowed the participant to have some distance with their shame, separating

between their past and present self in order to disconnect with the emotion.

For example, Diana portrayed herself as an emotional drunk similar to the

‘drunk stereotype’ depicted in films and soap operas, and her narrative was

accompanied by dramatic pauses and actions,

7

‘…I’d ring his bell. He wasn’t answering, so I rang again…and I just

collapsed on the doormat, like nobody loves me’ (Diana)

Likewise, Paula’s story took the listener on a dramatic journey of highs and

lows, resembling an emotional rollercoaster, with the listener being drawn into a sense

of hope and then sadness.

‘…things got better and then it would all go downhill again, I would be

completely out of control. I would be drunk all the time’ (Paula)

Raj’s narrative was also dramatic; but his story was narrated as if an actor was

playing his role. This had the effect of allowing Raj to narrate humorous scenes and

then pause to invite the listener to laugh,

‘… I ascribed to God, the category of logical fiction. Namely that there had

to be a God, because if there wasn’t I was f***ed’ (Raj)

‘…I mean I went to my doctors…I was put in touch with some psychiatrist who

wanted me to go into some kind of group, but it was kind of a really weird kind of

group… you know he looked like Freud (//laughs) and he had a German accent

(//laughs), he had a bow tie and all the rest of it and he said tell me about your

mother, and I was just sort of like what you on about… so I just thought sod this ‘

(Raj)

In the narratives we called ‘quest’ the common theme was that the listener was

taken on the narrator’s journey of recovery and personal discovery. Whilst it had

lows, there was a sense that the story would have a happy ending as it was told with

hindsight, thus the memories felt recalled as a past event, rather than reliving them

through the story telling.

In contrast to highly emotive melodramas, the quest genres maintained a

reflective tone throughout, often talking from hindsight,

‘….look[ing] back I realise that I was actually using my knowledge of

alcoholism to deny the fact that I had a problem’ (Gary)

Whereas the melodramas were emotional, the emotional impact in the quest

genres were minimised,

‘…I mean obviously it’s difficult to recollect from that time just how I felt

internally, but I probably felt distant’ (James)

They were often matter of fact,

8

‘I just realised that it’s either that or I die…and I didn’t want to die’ (Matthew)

In addition the quest genre showed contemplation about the future, leading the

listener to feel much more like the narrator was talking about themselves, rather than

another character

‘…maybe I’d not be in recovery now, without all these things …but I know

that I’ll make everything worse if I drink again’ (Dean)

Imagery

When analysing the narratives on a case-by-case level, a number of visual

images were created. It was understood that these images had the effect of assisting

the listener in visualising the participant’s shame, thus helping the listener to share

this experience and more full appreciate and understand the experience of shame. The

following images were created across all narratives.

‘Out of control train’

A repeated image “conjured up” was visualising the participant on an out of

control train. This image was powerful because it removed blame, giving the image of

desperation and lack of ability to stop, rather than a lack of desire,

‘…I just tumbled through life like that wing that tumbles with the wind and

then I get knocked up against the bush and stays there for a while, and then the wind

will blow the other way and I roll off down again’ (Paula)

The lack of control over one’s life was a source of shame in itself,

‘… I was ashamed of like my drinking and my behaviour and I didn’t

understand that once I had one drink I couldn’t stop’ (Michelle)

‘…the most shameful thing is admitting that you can’t deal with life without a

drink… Not being able to do anything unless I’d had a drink’ (Dean)

‘Being exposed’

Related to this came an image of people trying to become invisible. However

with this came shame with facing reality when they were exposed. The image of a

mask falling off and exposing vulnerability underneath was particularly strong in

James’ narrative,

‘… totally gone, totally disappeared…. I was exposed and there was no hiding

from it or pretending that it hadn’t happened. It had happened!’

9

For Gary and Raj the realisation that someone had discovered their secrets was

shameful,

‘…I didn’t realise that my wife was stood behind me. And I said “gosh I’m

really sorry, I don’t know what came over me”. She said “I do”. I said “what?” She

said “you’re an alcoholic” ’ (Gary)

‘…when a four-year-old says that, you can’t hide away’ (Raj)

In both of these narratives the critical moment in recognising a problem and seeking

help came at the point where their secrets were exposed.

How is shame experienced and/or understood by those in recovery from alcohol

dependence?

Alongside the techniques used in telling their stories, the following themes emerged:

‘Addicted Parent’

Half of the participants in the study described having had parents with an

addiction, and it was elaborated that having ‘an addicted parent’ was a source of

initial shame for many, long before their own drinking started. For example, Matthew

witnessed how alcohol broke-up his parents’ marriage; he felt ashamed of his father’s

behaviour and did not want to be like him, thus later in his narrative experiencing

further shame when he followed the same path.

‘…I never thought that I would follow the same path as him’ [alcoholic father]

(Matthew)

Diana and Paula referred to feeling shame as a consequence of having ‘an

addicted parent’ and the impact this had on feeling normal and fitting in with peers,

‘…because of her addiction you know, I couldn’t bring people home…we

didn’t have the niceties of life’ (Diana)

‘I was ashamed of our home, I couldn’t take people home’ (Paula)

It was also suggested that the process of experiencing one’s parent as feeling

shame then contributed to oneself experiencing shame,

‘I had a lot of shame thinking about it….my mother had got divorced because

she had an affair with a man and when her husband was away she got pregnant’

(Diana)

10

For others, family discourses about ‘inheriting’ the addiction were more

explicit,

‘….dad used to say to me it would never surprise me if you and your brother,

would end up going to AA meetings’ (Matthew)

‘Well my belief is that I was born an alcoholic’ (Paula)

Furthermore having ‘an addicted parent’ also caused ruptures in relationships

with parents, which then impacted on a person’s own sense of self,

‘… [Mums’] moods were really unpredictable; she could be really loving and

then really aggressive’ (Michelle)

‘…My mother didn’t protect me….decisions were not in [my] best interests

(Paula)

‘I know that he [father] instilled shame in me… unless your behaviour was

exemplary then you should be ashamed of yourself’ (Gary)

Therefore the theme of ‘addicted parent’ was embedded in a number of narratives and

appeared to be related to an early experience of shame. This was in terms of having an

addicted parent and having to hide part of their life from peers and also witnessing

one’s own parents experience shame.

‘Inferiority’ (Core Shame)

Inferiority was present across all narratives and referred to the experiences of

participants seeing themselves as different. For some, this was about not being

‘worthy’ or ‘up to scratch’,

‘…I had a lot of feelings of inferiority. I thought I was different to other

people. I thought that other people were better than me’ (Gary)

‘…I thought I was a bad person, I was always less… I don’t deserve to be

here’ (Paula)

Feelings of difference and inferiority were identified as a source of shame,

‘…I just had a sense of shame of who I was, I just didn’t think I was normal or

up to scratch’ (Michelle)

‘I knew that it was abnormal. I knew that it wasn’t what other people did and I

was ashamed of it.’(James)

11

‘… I just had a sense of shame of who I was’ (Michelle)

Drinking was therefore identified as a method for ‘transforming’ feelings of

inferiority, perhaps a way of managing shame,

‘…I absolutely adored the feelings it gave me. It transformed me, changed me’

(Gary)

‘… alcohol just took the edge off of life you know’ (Dean)

‘…I saw it [alcohol] as a very positive thing because obviously it was

enabling me to do things which I couldn’t normally do’ (James)

Whereas previous research has focused on shameful ‘behaviour’ associated

with drinking, the way that participants spoke about inferiority suggested that shame

was not about ‘doing’ something embarrassing, but instead feeling as though there

was a fault with the self. This was magnified via comparison with others,

‘I knew that it was abnormal. I knew that it wasn’t what other people did and I

was ashamed of it’ (James)

‘I felt I was ashamed in my life’ (Paula)

Rather than being embarrassed by actions while drinking, the deeper rooted core

shame and feelings of inferiority seemed to trigger initial drinking because of the pain

it caused. It was as if feelings of shame hindered entry into recovery because of the

belief that there was something fundamentally wrong with the person that could not

be repaired, as suggested by Paula

‘…it was like bristles in my brain they hurt me so much, I had to drink to take the

pain away’ (Paula)

‘Giving Back’

Despite the varying lengths of sobriety, all but one of the participants were

still attending AA, which seemed to be significant in participant’s construction of

12

their identity as a recovering alcoholic. Many participants specifically referred to this

as ‘giving back’,

‘…part of my recovery and staying recovered involves passing on and helping

others’ (James)

‘…I thought I would never get over that, but the years of doing things and

I’ve done a lot of service, I've given back’ (Paula)

Whilst the theme was primarily one of giving back and helping others,

continued service within AA also seemed to be related to dependency; a fear of what

could happen if one left the fellowship,

‘…perhaps I could remain abstinent for the rest of my life, I dunno perhaps I

could. But I’m not willing to try’ (Gary)

‘…I believe that if I did do [turn my back on AA] I would cut myself off from

the supply of whatever it is that is keeping me well’ (James)

In summary, participants’ continued commitment to AA appeared to serve as a

way of modelling to others how to be vulnerable and to provide support to others to

share their shame experiences.

Healing Through Hearing

All participants experienced AA as pivotal to recovery and it seemed that this

was as a result of hearing stories and normalising one’s own experiences. In hearing

stories, participants could make sense of and release their own feelings of shame.

‘There is no shame in AA, everyone has done much worse than anybody else.

You can just go and listen and nobody laughs at you’ (Diana)

‘…hearing other people tell their stories…it’s not just me that’s done that. It

doesn’t make it right, but it’s suddenly not as shaming’ (Matthew)

The process of making relationships seemed to be important for facilitating

connections with others,

‘I trusted the people and looking back that was a huge part’ (James)

‘I realised that was actually a vital point, having someone to talk to about

relationships and to pass something onto somebody’ (Raj)

Listening to others provided a forum that started a process of self-discovery,

13

‘It’s a learning process really. It’s like going back to the beginning, apart

from I can talk and walk…. I feel a bit like I’m armed with everything I need in life

but I don’t really know how to use it’ (Dean)

Acknowledging Shame

Acknowledging shame so that you could stop it from having power over you

in addition seemed to be part of the recovery process.

‘Being able to talk about shame and articulate it… It releases it, it ceases to

have power over you’ (James)

‘….it’s like bursting a pimple and all this gunk comes out and then you clean it up

and you can start healing. But the gunk has got to come out’ (Diana)

A narrative within AA is that alcoholism is an illness that cannot be recovered

from and this narrative appeared to provide acceptance,

‘I wasn’t a bad person trying to get good, I was a sick person trying to get well’

(Michelle)

Discussion

Constructing a Shame Narrative

Narrative theory suggests that scripts about the self are continually redefined

to make sense of experiences (Morgan, 2000). This study suggested that a key

mechanism for recovery involved participants developing personal understandings of

their shame by sharing their stories with other people and creating a ‘shame-

narrative’.

Genres were identified as a technique for discussing shame and helped

narrators externalise shame, locating it outside of the self and in another character. In

doing this, the narrator could control the shame and how it was presented; this was

often achieved by turning shaming events into comical ones. White and Epston (1990)

suggested that externalising emotions removes blame from the individual and makes

the emotion less important, therefore it could be interpreted that shame could be

talked about when the associated emotions were minimised. The use of a narrative

methodology that encourages the listener to follow the storyteller’s journey “walking

in their shoes” may in itself invoke empathy in the listener.

14

Brown (2012) proposed that in experiencing empathy we feel accepted rather

than judged, therefore perhaps this genre was a method of eliciting empathy, therefore

helping a person overcome shame.

How was shame experienced? (Foundations of Shame)

Participants spoke about shame as a deep-rooted view about themselves,

which we labelled as ‘core shame’. Core shame was spoken about in relation to the

theme of ‘inferiority’, which emerged in all narratives, capturing participant’s

experiences of feeling unworthy. Participants spoke about their feelings of difference;

alcohol being a method to elicit connection whereby feelings of inferiority could be

overcome. This would support Gilbert’s (2002) model of shame, who suggests that

humans have a desire ‘to belong’, with lack of connection being experienced as

rejection and subsequent shame. More recently Brown (2012) also suggested that

absence of connections leads to beliefs about being unworthy of belonging. Therefore

taken together with the interpretations from this study, it could be suggested that

‘inferiority’ prevents connection and this increases feelings of inferiority; thus

maintaining shame. Alcohol dependence could therefore be maintained in order to

manage these deep-rooted feelings of shame.

Some participants talked about their parent’s addictions and the impact this

had on feeling different from peers and the shame of this. Although not everyone with

alcohol dependence or who experiences shame will have an ‘addicted parent’, these

experiences for some could provide an explanation for how ‘core shame’ develops.

Those with ‘addicted parents’ not only felt differences with peers but also had

reduced opportunities to connect, due to fear of peers finding out about their parent’s

addiction. Jacobs and Jacobs (2015) suggested that in avoiding potential shame

associated with the ‘addicted’ family member, families become silent. This study

could suggest that whilst silence stops peers from discovering their ‘addicted parent’,

remaining silent ceases connections with peers, which actually reinforces shame.

Using Shame in Recovery

Acknowledgment was a theme to emerge across narratives. In recovery this

was often about developing a new narrative; moving from a place of seeing oneself as

inherently bad, to a narrative about oneself having done ‘bad things’. It may indicate

15

the importance of being able to develop a compassionate narrative about the self

during recovery and more specifically how compassionate narratives may help to

alleviate shame (Gilbert, 2009).

‘Healing through hearing’ was a theme that captured participants’ experiences

of connecting to others during recovery. Listening to others may have provided a

template by which participants could talk about their own shame and facilitated

connections through having shared experiences and feeling ‘normal’ (Brown, 2012).

Bowlby (1980) suggested that responsive and sensitive caregivers who acknowledge

distress, assist children to develop secure attachments. Therefore, potentially AA may

provide a substitute secure attachment or a forum in which attachment security can be

fostered, thus promoting feelings of trust and safety to acknowledge shame and

manage the associated distress.

‘Giving back’ was another theme related to recovery. Helping others by

telling one’s own story and sharing the messages of AA is an important narrative

within AA, therefore it was unsurprising that this was dominant in participant’s

narratives. ‘Giving back’ helped participants to feel worthy of the support that they

had received, helped to challenge beliefs of inadequacy and inferiority and provided

opportunities to maintain connections and build new relationships.

Clinical Implications and Limitations

This study suggests that the assessment and consideration of shame in the

treatment of those who enter services for alcohol dependence is crucial, yet often

missing. ‘Cost-effective’ treatments for Alcohol Use Disorders are often time-limited,

usually 6-12 sessions (NICE, 2011), however this only allows for a limited time to

develop a trusting therapeutic-relationship. As this study implies that trust and safety

is necessary prior to exploring issues of shame, it is possible that therapy effectiveness

is compromised in time-limited treatments, especially in patients who feel shame.

An important clinical implication of this research is that it indicates the

importance of being able to develop a compassionate narrative about the self during

recovery (as in the therapy intervention described by Luoma et al., 2012) and more

specifically how compassionate narratives may help to alleviate shame (Gilbert, 2009)

and help prevent relapse.

This study implies that those who experience shame may feel threatened by

the thought of someone judging them. This will only perpetuate feelings of inferiority;

16

and therefore reducing shame and stigma about alcohol dependence within society

could help to make accessing treatments easier. For example, recently ‘sobriety tags’

have been introduced in some areas of London. These tags monitor alcohol

consumption in those who drink and offend, with the person being brought back to

court should they drink whilst wearing the tag. Whilst it is acknowledged that they

have been reported to reduce drinking (Lockhart-Mirams, Pickles & Crowhurst,

2015), this study would argue that such interventions are also likely to reinforce

shame associated with alcohol dependence within society and make a person feel

worse about themselves.

This study would also bring into question the effectiveness of public health

campaigns that use humiliation and shame as a deterrent for drinking alcohol and

instead would indicate the dangers that reinforcing shame in those who already have

alcohol dependence.

One limitation of this study is that AA members are not necessarily

representative of the population of recovering alcohol dependent people and thus the

results may not apply to other groups. Further research is needed with other groups as

well as validation of these findings using quantitative methods with a larger sample.

Acknowledgements, Funding and Authors’ notes

We are grateful to the participants for giving up their time for this study. This paper is

based on work submitted by the first author in partial fulfilment for the Doctorate in

Clinical Psychology at the University of Surrey and was internally funded.

Disclosure of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

Barker C, Pistrang N, Elliott, R. (2008). Research Methods in Clinical

Psychology. An Introduction for Students and Practitioners. Chichester: John

Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

17

Baumeister, RF, Stillwell, AM, Heatherton, TF. (1995). Personal narratives about

guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships. Basic and Applied

Social Psychology, 17 (1-2), 173-198.

Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms

the way we live, love, parent, and lead. New York: Gotham Books.

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: vol 3. Loss: Sadness and depression.

New York: Basic Books.

Crossley, ML. (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the

construction of meaning. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw Hill and Open University

Press.

Chase, E., & Walker, R. (2013). The co-construction of shame in the context of poverty: beyond a threat to the social bond. Sociology, 47 (4), 739-754.

Gelkopf, M, Levitt, S, Bleich, A. (2002). An integration of three approaches to

addiction and methadone maintenance treatment: the self-medication hypothesis,

the disease model and social criticism. The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and

Related Sciences, 39 (2), 140-151.

Gilbert, P. (2002). Body shame: A biopsychosocial conceptualization and

overview, with treatment implications. In P. Gilbert & J. Miles (Eds.), Body

shame: conceptualization, research and treatment (pp.3-54). London: Brunner-

Routledge.

Gilbert, P. (2006). A biopsychosocial and evolutionary approach to formulation

with a special focus on shame. In N. Tarrier (Eds.), Case formulation in CBT. The

treatment of challenging and complex cases (pp.81-112). East Sussex: Routledge.

Gilbert, P. (2009). The compassionate mind. London: Constable.

International Wine and Spirit Research. (2016). WSTA Market Overview.

Available from

http://www.wsta.co.uk/publications-useful-documents/117-wsta-market-

18

overview-2016/file

Jacobs, L, Jacobs, J. (2015). “Fixing: mothers who drink: Family narrative on

secrecy, shame and silence. The Open Family Studies Journal, 7, 28-33.

Kim, S, Thibodeau, R. Jorgensen, RS. (2011). Shame, guilt and depressive

symptoms: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 68-96.

Lewis, M. (1995). Shame: the exposed self. New York: The Free Press.

Lockhart-Mirams, G, Pickles, C, Crowhurst, E. (2015). Cutting crime: the role of

tagging in offender management. London: Reform Research Trust.

Luoma, JB, Kohlenberg, BS, Hayes, SC, Fletcher, L. (2012). Slow and steady

wins the race: A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy

targeting shame in substance use disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical

Psychology, 80 (1), 43-53.

Meehan, W, O’Connor, LE, Berry, JW, Weiss, J, Morrison, A, Acampora, A.

(1996). Guilt, shame and depression in clients in recovery from addiction.

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 28 (2), 125-134.

Morgan, A. (2000). What is narrative therapy? An easy-to-read introduction.

Adelaide. Dulwich Centre Publications.

Murray, M. (2008). Narrative psychology. In J. Smith (Eds.), Qualitative

psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 111-132.). London: Sage.

NICE. (2011). Alcohol-user disorders: diagnosis, assessment and management of

harmful drinking and alcohol dependence. NICE Clinical Guideline 115.

Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg115

O’Connor, LE, Weiss, J. (1993). Individual psychotherapy for addicted clients:

An application of control mastery theory. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 25 (4),

283-291.

Potter-Efron, R. (1987). Shame and guilt: Definitions, processes and treatment

issues with AODA clients. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 4(2), 7–24.

19

Ramsey, E. (1987). From guilt through shame to AA: A self-reconciliation

process. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 4 (2), 87-107.

Riessman, CK. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. California:

Sage.

Rowe, D. (1989). Construction of life and death. Discovering meaning in a world

of uncertainty. London: Fontana.

Sanders, JM. (2011) Feminist perspectives on 12-step recovery: A comparative

descriptive analysis of women in alcoholics anonymous and narcotics

anonymous. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 29, 357-378.

Scheff, T. J. (2000). Shame and the social bond: A sociological theory. Sociological Theory, 18 (1), 84-9

Schomerus, G, Lucht, M, Holzinger, A, Matschinger, H, Carta, MG,

Angermeyer, MC. (2011). The stigma of alcohol dependence compared with

other mental disorders: A review of population studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism,

46, (2), 105-112.

Tangney, JP, Stuewig, J, Mashek, DJ. (2007). Moral Emotions and Moral

Behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.

Tangney, JP, Wagner, P, Gramzow, R. (1992). Proneness to shame, proneness to

guilt, and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101 (3), 469-478.

Treeby, M, Bruno, R. (2012). Shame and guilt-proneness: Divergent implications

for problematic alcohol use and drinking to cope with anxiety and depression

symptomatology. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 613-617.

Watts, R, Linke, S, Murray, E, Barker, C. (2015). Calling the shots: Young

Professional Women’s relationship with alcohol. Feminism & Psychology, 0 (0),

1-16.

White, M. Epston, D. (1990). Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York:

WWNorton.

Wiechelt, SA. (2007). The specter of shame in substance misuse. Substance Use

and Abuse 42 (2-3), 399-409.

20

21