epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · xls file · web view ·...

547
FACILITY ID FACILITY NAME 0121010003 Liberty Casting Co 0121010003 Liberty Casting Co 0121010003 Liberty Casting Co 0121010003 Liberty Casting Co 0121010003 Liberty Casting Co 0121010003 Liberty Casting Co 0121010003 Liberty Casting Co 0121010003 Liberty Casting Co 0121010003 Liberty Casting Co 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc 0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC. 0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC. 0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC. 0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC. 0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC. 0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings 0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings 0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings 0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings 0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings 0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings 0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings 0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings 0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings

Upload: truongxuyen

Post on 19-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

FACILITY ID FACILITY NAME0121010003 Liberty Casting Co0121010003 Liberty Casting Co0121010003 Liberty Casting Co0121010003 Liberty Casting Co0121010003 Liberty Casting Co0121010003 Liberty Casting Co0121010003 Liberty Casting Co0121010003 Liberty Casting Co0121010003 Liberty Casting Co0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0123010015 Fairfield Medical Center0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0124010112 Fiber-Tech Industries Inc0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC.0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC.0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC.0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC.0125031840 TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC.0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings0125040020 Columbus Steel Castings0125040064 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.0125040064 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.0125040064 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.0125040064 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.

Page 2: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0125040064 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.0125040064 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.0125040064 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.0125040238 CAPITAL RESIN CORP0125040238 CAPITAL RESIN CORP0125040238 CAPITAL RESIN CORP0125040238 CAPITAL RESIN CORP0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040716 Calgon Carbon Corp.0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC

Page 3: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040904 Georgia Pacific Chemicals LLC0125040915 Plaskolite, Inc.0125041807 QG Printing II Corp.0125041807 QG Printing II Corp.0125041807 QG Printing II Corp.0125041807 QG Printing II Corp.0125041807 QG Printing II Corp.0125041807 QG Printing II Corp.0125042458 Shelly Materials Plant #900125042608 The Ohio State University0125042608 The Ohio State University0125042608 The Ohio State University0125042608 The Ohio State University0125042608 The Ohio State University0125042608 The Ohio State University0125042608 The Ohio State University0125042608 The Ohio State University0125042608 The Ohio State University0125042608 The Ohio State University0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0125070213 Industrial Container Services - OH, LLC0142000091 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5040142000091 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5040142000091 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 504

Page 4: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0142000091 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5040142000091 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5040142000091 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5040142010014 Knox Community Hospital0142010065 OWENS CORNING0142010065 OWENS CORNING0142010065 OWENS CORNING0142010065 OWENS CORNING0142010065 OWENS CORNING0142010065 OWENS CORNING0142010065 OWENS CORNING0142010065 OWENS CORNING0142010065 OWENS CORNING0142010065 OWENS CORNING0145000018 Denison University0145000018 Denison University0145000018 Denison University0145000018 Denison University0145000213 Momentive Performance Materials Quartz, Inc.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.

Page 5: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0145020235 Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.0149000088 SHOWA Aluminum Corporation of America0149000088 SHOWA Aluminum Corporation of America0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY

Page 6: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0149000089 STANLEY ELECTRIC US COMPANY0165000007 PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. (Circleville)0165000007 PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. (Circleville)0165000007 PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. (Circleville)0165010135 Westfall Aggregate and Materials, Inc.0165010135 Westfall Aggregate and Materials, Inc.0165010135 Westfall Aggregate and Materials, Inc.0165010135 Westfall Aggregate and Materials, Inc.0165010135 Westfall Aggregate and Materials, Inc.0165010135 Westfall Aggregate and Materials, Inc.0180000130 Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.0180010008 The Scotts Co.0180010008 The Scotts Co.0180010008 The Scotts Co.0180010008 The Scotts Co.0180010008 The Scotts Co.0180010008 The Scotts Co.0204000133 Citadel Plastics (Formerly Premix, Inc.)0204010000 FirstEnergy Generation Corp., Ashtabula Plant0204010008 KOSKI CONSTRUCTION CO0204010112 Iten Industries, Inc. - Plant 10204010112 Iten Industries, Inc. - Plant 10204010112 Iten Industries, Inc. - Plant 10204010112 Iten Industries, Inc. - Plant 10204010112 Iten Industries, Inc. - Plant 10204010230 MFG, Composite Systems0210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 214

Page 7: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000046 Tennessee Gas Pipeline - Station 2140210000101 Dominion Transmission - Carroll Station0210000101 Dominion Transmission - Carroll Station0210000101 Dominion Transmission - Carroll Station0210000101 Dominion Transmission - Carroll Station0210000101 Dominion Transmission - Carroll Station0210000101 Dominion Transmission - Carroll Station0215010001 COL-PUMP COMPANY, INC.0215010001 COL-PUMP COMPANY, INC.0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000186 Masco Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1)0228000213 MASCO Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant 2)0228000213 MASCO Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant 2)0228000213 MASCO Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant 2)0228000213 MASCO Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant 2)0228000213 MASCO Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant 2)0228000213 MASCO Cabinetry Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant 2)0243000024 The Lubrizol Corporation0243000024 The Lubrizol Corporation0243001188 Marking Films Div. of Avery Dennison Building #110243001188 Marking Films Div. of Avery Dennison Building #110243001188 Marking Films Div. of Avery Dennison Building #110243001188 Marking Films Div. of Avery Dennison Building #110243020004 EQUISTAR Chemicals, LP0243020004 EQUISTAR Chemicals, LP0243020004 EQUISTAR Chemicals, LP0243020004 EQUISTAR Chemicals, LP0243030257 Carmeuse Lime, Inc - Grand River Operations

Page 8: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0243030257 Carmeuse Lime, Inc - Grand River Operations0243030257 Carmeuse Lime, Inc - Grand River Operations0243030257 Carmeuse Lime, Inc - Grand River Operations0243030583 OSBORNE CONCRETE & STONE CO0243160009 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., EASTLAKE PLANT0243160009 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., EASTLAKE PLANT0243160009 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., EASTLAKE PLANT0243160009 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., EASTLAKE PLANT0243160009 CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., EASTLAKE PLANT0247030013 Avon Lake Power Plant0247030013 Avon Lake Power Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247030471 Ford Motor Company - Ohio Assembly Plant0247080229 Republic Steel, f/k/a Republic Engineered Products, Inc0247080229 Republic Steel, f/k/a Republic Engineered Products, Inc0247080229 Republic Steel, f/k/a Republic Engineered Products, Inc0247080229 Republic Steel, f/k/a Republic Engineered Products, Inc0247080229 Republic Steel, f/k/a Republic Engineered Products, Inc0247080229 Republic Steel, f/k/a Republic Engineered Products, Inc0247100408 OBERLIN COLLEGE0247100408 OBERLIN COLLEGE0247100408 OBERLIN COLLEGE0247100408 OBERLIN COLLEGE0247100408 OBERLIN COLLEGE0247100408 OBERLIN COLLEGE0247101010 Green Circle Growers0247101010 Green Circle Growers0247101010 Green Circle Growers0247101010 Green Circle Growers0250000859 Petersburg Quarry Plant #416, The Shelly Company0250000989 BAIRD BROTHERS SAWMILL INC0250000989 BAIRD BROTHERS SAWMILL INC0250000989 BAIRD BROTHERS SAWMILL INC0250001002 SUBTROPOLIS MINING CO.0250090626 Astro Shapes LLC0250090626 Astro Shapes LLC

Page 9: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0250110227 MARATHON PETROLEUM CO LP - Youngstown0250110920 EXAL CORP0250110920 EXAL CORP0250110920 EXAL CORP0250110920 EXAL CORP0278000463 BDM Warren Steel Operations, LLC0278000463 BDM Warren Steel Operations, LLC0278000463 BDM Warren Steel Operations, LLC0278000463 BDM Warren Steel Operations, LLC0278020021 Indalex Aluminum Solutions-Girard Plant0278020021 Indalex Aluminum Solutions-Girard Plant0278060023 Niles Plant0278060023 Niles Plant0278060352 IRONIC INC0278060360 Cleveland Steel Container Corp.0278060678 Harsco Corp, Harsco Minerals Div0278080443 MAR-ZANE PLANT NO 270278080443 MAR-ZANE PLANT NO 270278080634 Stericycle Inc0278080634 Stericycle Inc0278080634 Stericycle Inc0278080634 Stericycle Inc0278080634 Stericycle Inc0278080634 Stericycle Inc0278080634 Stericycle Inc0278080634 Stericycle Inc0278080634 Stericycle Inc0285000099 D & R Supply, Inc.0285000366 East Ohio Gas - Chippewa Station0285010001 The Quality Castings Company0285010001 The Quality Castings Company0285010001 The Quality Castings Company0285010001 The Quality Castings Company0285010001 The Quality Castings Company0285010001 The Quality Castings Company0285010001 The Quality Castings Company0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC

Page 10: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010034 Ross Sand Casting Industry, LLC0285010331 BEKAERT CORPORATION0285010331 BEKAERT CORPORATION0285030180 College of Wooster0302000001 Chemtrade Logistics Inc0302000001 Chemtrade Logistics Inc0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302000166 DTR Industries Incorporated0302020012 Lima Refining Company0302020012 Lima Refining Company0302020012 Lima Refining Company0302020012 Lima Refining Company0302020012 Lima Refining Company0302020012 Lima Refining Company0302020012 Lima Refining Company0302020012 Lima Refining Company0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020027 Joint Systems Manufacturing Center0302020343 ISP0302020343 ISP0302020343 ISP0302020343 ISP0302020343 ISP0303010193 Sarver Paving Company (0193)0303010193 Sarver Paving Company (0193)0303010193 Sarver Paving Company (0193)0303010193 Sarver Paving Company (0193)0303010193 Sarver Paving Company (0193)0303010193 Sarver Paving Company (0193)

Page 11: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0306000133 Nidec Minster Corporation0306000133 Nidec Minster Corporation0306010010 CITY OF ST. MARYS POWER PLANT0306010010 CITY OF ST. MARYS POWER PLANT0306010010 CITY OF ST. MARYS POWER PLANT0306010010 CITY OF ST. MARYS POWER PLANT0306010010 CITY OF ST. MARYS POWER PLANT0317010115 National Lime & Stone Company0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations

Page 12: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010001 GM Defiance Casting Operations0320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 20320010003 Johns Manville International Inc. - Defiance Plant 2

Page 13: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010005 Johns Manville0320010169 ANR Pipeline Company0320010169 ANR Pipeline Company0320010169 ANR Pipeline Company0320010169 ANR Pipeline Company0322020256 Erie Materials0326000073 NorthStar Bluescope Steel, LLC0326000073 NorthStar Bluescope Steel, LLC0326000073 NorthStar Bluescope Steel, LLC0326000073 NorthStar Bluescope Steel, LLC0326000073 NorthStar Bluescope Steel, LLC0326000073 NorthStar Bluescope Steel, LLC0326000073 NorthStar Bluescope Steel, LLC0326000073 NorthStar Bluescope Steel, LLC0326000094 GREEN BAY PACKAGING INC.0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0326000160 Sauder Woodworking0332010170 Whirlpool Findlay Division0332010170 Whirlpool Findlay Division0332010170 Whirlpool Findlay Division0332010170 Whirlpool Findlay Division0335010053 Silgan Can Company0335010053 Silgan Can Company0335010053 Silgan Can Company0335010105 Campbell Soup Company

Page 14: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0335010105 Campbell Soup Company0335010105 Campbell Soup Company0335010105 Campbell Soup Company0335010105 Campbell Soup Company0335010105 Campbell Soup Company0335010105 Campbell Soup Company0335010105 Campbell Soup Company0335010105 Campbell Soup Company0335010108 Tenneco Inc - Napoleon Plant0335010108 Tenneco Inc - Napoleon Plant0339020158 New Horizons Baking Company0339030135 R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company0351000005 Glen Gery Corporation0351000005 Glen Gery Corporation0351000005 Glen Gery Corporation0351010017 Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.0351010017 Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.0351010017 Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.0351010017 Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.0351010017 Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.0362000078 US Gypsum Company0362000078 US Gypsum Company0362000078 US Gypsum Company0362000078 US Gypsum Company0362000078 US Gypsum Company0370000134 Noble Road Landfill0370000134 Noble Road Landfill0370010004 OhioHealth MedCentral0370010004 OhioHealth MedCentral0370010212 MILLIRON RECYCLING, INC.0370010212 MILLIRON RECYCLING, INC.0370020002 SHELBY MUNICIPAL LIGHT PLANT0370020002 SHELBY MUNICIPAL LIGHT PLANT0370020002 SHELBY MUNICIPAL LIGHT PLANT0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000081 Carmeuse Lime Inc Millersville Operations0372000105 VICKERY ENVIRONMENTAL INC0372000105 VICKERY ENVIRONMENTAL INC0372000105 VICKERY ENVIRONMENTAL INC0372000105 VICKERY ENVIRONMENTAL INC0374020005 AMERICAN STANDARD INC0381000011 Bunge North America

Page 15: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0381000011 Bunge North America0381000011 Bunge North America0387000259 Evergreen Recycling and Disposal Facility0387000348 Shelly Materials, Plant # 1280387000348 Shelly Materials, Plant # 1280387000376 Charter Steel0387020330 Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc.0387020330 Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc.0388000002 Continental Structural Plastics0388000004 National Lime & Stone Co. - Carey0388000004 National Lime & Stone Co. - Carey0388000004 National Lime & Stone Co. - Carey0388000004 National Lime & Stone Co. - Carey0388000004 National Lime & Stone Co. - Carey0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010003 ReConserve of Ohio0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0388010047 Bridgestone APM Co.- AVD Plant0448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448000012 Johns Manville / Plant #01 - wtv10448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.

Page 16: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448002011 JOHNSON CONTROL BATTERY GROUP INC.0448010066 Libbey Glass Inc.0448010066 Libbey Glass Inc.0448010066 Libbey Glass Inc.0448010066 Libbey Glass Inc.0448010066 Libbey Glass Inc.0448010066 Libbey Glass Inc.0448010066 Libbey Glass Inc.0448010075 Textileather Corporation0448010075 Textileather Corporation0448010075 Textileather Corporation0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448010246 Toledo Refining Company, LLC.0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011550 Arclin USA, LLC0448011741 Willcrest Corp0448020006 FirstEnergy Generation LLC, Bay Shore Plant

Page 17: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0448020006 FirstEnergy Generation LLC, Bay Shore Plant0448020006 FirstEnergy Generation LLC, Bay Shore Plant0448020006 FirstEnergy Generation LLC, Bay Shore Plant0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020007 BP-Husky Refining LLC0448020014 Chemtrade Refinery Solutions Limited Partnership0448020014 Chemtrade Refinery Solutions Limited Partnership0448020085 LINDE GAS NORTH AMERICA, LLC

Page 18: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0448020085 LINDE GAS NORTH AMERICA, LLC0448020085 LINDE GAS NORTH AMERICA, LLC0448020085 LINDE GAS NORTH AMERICA, LLC0448020085 LINDE GAS NORTH AMERICA, LLC0448020085 LINDE GAS NORTH AMERICA, LLC0448020085 LINDE GAS NORTH AMERICA, LLC0448020085 LINDE GAS NORTH AMERICA, LLC0448950003 Crestline Paving/Excavating0448995005 Bierlein Services, Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0487010012 Pilkington North America Inc0536010011 RR Donnelley - Greenfield Div0536010011 RR Donnelley - Greenfield Div0536010011 RR Donnelley - Greenfield Div0536010011 RR Donnelley - Greenfield Div0536010011 RR Donnelley - Greenfield Div0536010034 Johnson Controls Inc.0536010034 Johnson Controls Inc.0536010034 Johnson Controls Inc.0536010034 Johnson Controls Inc.0536010034 Johnson Controls Inc.0536010034 Johnson Controls Inc.0536010034 Johnson Controls Inc.0536010034 Johnson Controls Inc.0536020113 MILLER-MASON PAVING CO., INC.0536020113 MILLER-MASON PAVING CO., INC.0536020113 MILLER-MASON PAVING CO., INC.0536020113 MILLER-MASON PAVING CO., INC.0536020113 MILLER-MASON PAVING CO., INC.0536020113 MILLER-MASON PAVING CO., INC.0546000101 Honda Transmission Mfg. of America Inc.0546000117 HONDA OF AMERICA, EAST LIBERTY PLANT0546000117 HONDA OF AMERICA, EAST LIBERTY PLANT0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.

Page 19: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0546010011 DAIDO METAL U.S.A. INC.0575000174 Honda of America Mfg., Inc. Anna Engine Plant0575000174 Honda of America Mfg., Inc. Anna Engine Plant0575000174 Honda of America Mfg., Inc. Anna Engine Plant0575010231 BBI ENTERPRISES INC0575010231 BBI ENTERPRISES INC0575010231 BBI ENTERPRISES INC0575010238 IVEX Protective Packaging Inc. (Protec Pac USA)0575010238 IVEX Protective Packaging Inc. (Protec Pac USA)0605000020 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 2040605000020 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 2040605000020 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 2040605000020 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 2040607100109 Mar Zane Plant No 290607100109 Mar Zane Plant No 290607100109 Mar Zane Plant No 290607100109 Mar Zane Plant No 290607100109 Mar Zane Plant No 290607100109 Mar Zane Plant No 290607130015 R. E. BURGER PLANT0607130015 R. E. BURGER PLANT0607130015 R. E. BURGER PLANT0607130015 R. E. BURGER PLANT0607130015 R. E. BURGER PLANT0616000000 Conesville Power Plant0616000000 Conesville Power Plant0616000000 Conesville Power Plant0616000000 Conesville Power Plant0616000000 Conesville Power Plant0616010001 RockTenn CP,LLC0616010006 McWane Ductile - Ohio0616010006 McWane Ductile - Ohio0616010006 McWane Ductile - Ohio0627000003 Ohio Valley Electric Corp., Kyger Creek Station0627000003 Ohio Valley Electric Corp., Kyger Creek Station0627000003 Ohio Valley Electric Corp., Kyger Creek Station0627000003 Ohio Valley Electric Corp., Kyger Creek Station0627000003 Ohio Valley Electric Corp., Kyger Creek Station0627000005 Harsco Minerals Division, Harsco Corp.0630000001 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 2090630000001 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 2090630000001 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 2090630000001 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 2090630000001 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 2090630000001 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 209

Page 20: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0630000007 Plastech Engineered Products Inc0630000007 Plastech Engineered Products Inc0630000007 Plastech Engineered Products Inc0630000007 Plastech Engineered Products Inc0630000007 Plastech Engineered Products Inc0630010005 AMG Vanadium, Inc.0634000012 Bowerston Shale Company0634950025 Mineral Trading Co., LLC0637000000 Mar Zane Plant No 40637000000 Mar Zane Plant No 40637000000 Mar Zane Plant No 40637000000 Mar Zane Plant No 40637000000 Mar Zane Plant No 40637000000 Mar Zane Plant No 40640010009 OSCO Inc.-Jackson Division0640010009 OSCO Inc.-Jackson Division0640010009 OSCO Inc.-Jackson Division0640010009 OSCO Inc.-Jackson Division0640010020 Masco Cabinetry, Merillat, Jackson, OH0640010020 Masco Cabinetry, Merillat, Jackson, OH0640010020 Masco Cabinetry, Merillat, Jackson, OH0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0640010105 Elemetal Refining LLC0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant (Cardinal Operating Company)0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant (Cardinal Operating Company)0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant (Cardinal Operating Company)0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant (Cardinal Operating Company)0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant (Cardinal Operating Company)0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant (Cardinal Operating Company)0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant (Cardinal Operating Company)0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant (Cardinal Operating Company)0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant (Cardinal Operating Company)

Page 21: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641090010 Mingo Junction Steel Works LLC0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0641180064 Titanium Metals Corporation0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0656000001 Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp.0660000080 Mar Zane Plant No 120660000080 Mar Zane Plant No 120660000080 Mar Zane Plant No 120660000080 Mar Zane Plant No 120660000080 Mar Zane Plant No 12

Page 22: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0660000080 Mar Zane Plant No 120660010006 AK Steel - Zanesville Works0660010006 AK Steel - Zanesville Works0660010007 Owens Brockway Glass Containers - Plant #120660010007 Owens Brockway Glass Containers - Plant #120660010007 Owens Brockway Glass Containers - Plant #120660010007 Owens Brockway Glass Containers - Plant #120660010007 Owens Brockway Glass Containers - Plant #120660010007 Owens Brockway Glass Containers - Plant #120660950006 SIDWELL MATERIALS, INC.-TRI-SON SCREENING PLANT0660950012 SIDWELL MATERIALS PORTABLE ELJAY CRUSHIN0660950014 SIDWELL MATERIALS IROCK 300 PORTABLE CRUSHING0660950016 Sidwell Materials CedarRapids Horizontal Screen0660950022 Sidwell Materials Inc. Portable IROCK 200 Crusher0660950045 Sidwell Materials Simplicity 4424 Portab0660950048 Sidwell Materials Deister Triple Deck Horizontal0661000027 International Converter, Inc. - Caldwell0661000027 International Converter, Inc. - Caldwell0661000027 International Converter, Inc. - Caldwell0661000027 International Converter, Inc. - Caldwell0664000056 Waste Management of Ohio (Suburban South Recycling)0664000056 Waste Management of Ohio (Suburban South Recycling)0664000067 Superior Fibers Shawnee LLC0664000067 Superior Fibers Shawnee LLC0664000087 Premier Silica - Glass Rock Operation0664980002 Allied Corporation Plant #770664980002 Allied Corporation Plant #770664980002 Allied Corporation Plant #770664980002 Allied Corporation Plant #770664980002 Allied Corporation Plant #770664980002 Allied Corporation Plant #770666000000 American Centrifuge Operating, LLC0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0666010033 MASCO Retail Cabinet Group - Waverly0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility

Page 23: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0671010028 P. H. Glatfelter Company - Chillicothe Facility0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679000118 The Belden Brick Company0679950023 Penn-Ohio Coal Co. - Portable Stone (East Sparta)0682000006 INDUSTRIAL TIMBER & LUMBER CO. ( Vinton County Dry Kiln0682000006 INDUSTRIAL TIMBER & LUMBER CO. ( Vinton County Dry Kiln0684000000 Muskingum River Power Plant0684000148 Marietta Industrial Enterprises0684010011 Kraton Polymers U.S. LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010049 Orion Engineered Carbons LLC0684010100 Marathon Petroleum Co LP0684010100 Marathon Petroleum Co LP0684020006 Eramet Marietta, Inc.

Page 24: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0684020006 Eramet Marietta, Inc.0684020006 Eramet Marietta, Inc.0684020006 Eramet Marietta, Inc.0684020006 Eramet Marietta, Inc.0684020006 Eramet Marietta, Inc.0684020006 Eramet Marietta, Inc.0684020006 Eramet Marietta, Inc.0684020006 Eramet Marietta, Inc.0684020008 Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, L.L.C.0684020008 Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, L.L.C.0684020008 Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, L.L.C.0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station0744000150 Hanging Rock Energy Facility0744000150 Hanging Rock Energy Facility0744000150 Hanging Rock Energy Facility0744000150 Hanging Rock Energy Facility0773000080 Haverhill Chemicals0773000080 Haverhill Chemicals0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010001 OSCO Industries - Portsmouth Division0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0773010180 OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. NEW BOSTON DIVISI0819070215 JAFE DECORATING INC.0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN

Page 25: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0819780231 TEXAS EASTERN TRANS, LP - GLEN KARN0829060557 ALI INDUSTRIES, INC.0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700165 CEMEX Construction Materials Atlantic, LLC0829700441 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base0829700441 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base0829700441 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base0829700441 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base0829700441 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base0829700441 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base0829700441 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base0829700441 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base0829710020 VALLEY ASPHALT CORP - PLANT #110829710020 VALLEY ASPHALT CORP - PLANT #110829710020 VALLEY ASPHALT CORP - PLANT #110829710020 VALLEY ASPHALT CORP - PLANT #110829710020 VALLEY ASPHALT CORP - PLANT #110829710020 VALLEY ASPHALT CORP - PLANT #110855140498 3 SIGMA CORP0855140498 3 SIGMA CORP0857040266 BP Oil Company - Dayton Terminal0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857040931 DPH-DAS LLC, Home Avenue0857041124 Cargill, Inc. - Dayton

Page 26: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0857041333 Tate & Lyle, Dayton0857041333 Tate & Lyle, Dayton0857041333 Tate & Lyle, Dayton0857041333 Tate & Lyle, Dayton0857041333 Tate & Lyle, Dayton0857041333 Tate & Lyle, Dayton0857043187 Barrett Paving - Carthage Drum #1370857043187 Barrett Paving - Carthage Drum #1370857043187 Barrett Paving - Carthage Drum #1370857080148 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company, Inc.0857080148 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company, Inc.0857080148 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company, Inc.0857080148 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company, Inc.0857080148 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company, Inc.0857080148 Tenneco Automotive Operating Company, Inc.0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0857780013 DP&L, O.H. Hutchings Generating Station0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC0868090072 ROHM & HAAS CHEMICALS LLC

Page 27: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1318000062 Aleris Specialty Products, Inc.1318000062 Aleris Specialty Products, Inc.1318000245 Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., Lake Shore Plant1318000246 Cleveland Thermal LLC1318000246 Cleveland Thermal LLC1318000246 Cleveland Thermal LLC1318001613 ArcelorMittal Cleveland LLC1318001613 ArcelorMittal Cleveland LLC1318006552 Day-Glo Color Corp.1318006552 Day-Glo Color Corp.1318006552 Day-Glo Color Corp.1318006552 Day-Glo Color Corp.1318008401 HEIDTMAN STEEL PRODUCTS, INC.1318067810 International Paint LLC1318120180 Ford Motor Company, Cleveland Casting Plant1318170235 FERRO CORPORATION - CLEVELAND FRIT PLANT1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318171623 Charter Steel - Cleveland Inc1318172479 Southerly Wastewater Treatment Center1318270383 DiGeronimo Aggregates LLC1318270383 DiGeronimo Aggregates LLC1318270383 DiGeronimo Aggregates LLC1318270383 DiGeronimo Aggregates LLC1318270383 DiGeronimo Aggregates LLC1318270383 DiGeronimo Aggregates LLC1318270383 DiGeronimo Aggregates LLC1318270383 DiGeronimo Aggregates LLC1318281215 GrafTech International Holdings Inc.1318281215 GrafTech International Holdings Inc.1318281215 GrafTech International Holdings Inc.1318281215 GrafTech International Holdings Inc.1318281215 GrafTech International Holdings Inc.1318281215 GrafTech International Holdings Inc.1318400068 FEDERAL METAL CO1318400068 FEDERAL METAL CO1318453876 GrafTech International Holdings, Inc.1318453876 GrafTech International Holdings, Inc.1318453876 GrafTech International Holdings, Inc.1318453876 GrafTech International Holdings, Inc.1318453876 GrafTech International Holdings, Inc.1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC

Page 28: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318538151 MM Cuyahoga Energy LLC1318617346 USG Interiors, Inc., American Metals Corp., Westlake1318617346 USG Interiors, Inc., American Metals Corp., Westlake1318617346 USG Interiors, Inc., American Metals Corp., Westlake1318958526 HARD ROCK CRUSHING LTD1409000186 Normac Company LLC1409000186 Normac Company LLC1409000186 Normac Company LLC1409000186 Normac Company LLC1409000186 Normac Company LLC1409000186 Normac Company LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000353 MillerCoors LLC1409000675 DEE SIGN COMPANY1409000896 Duke Energy Indiana, Madison Generating Station1409000896 Duke Energy Indiana, Madison Generating Station1409000896 Duke Energy Indiana, Madison Generating Station1409000896 Duke Energy Indiana, Madison Generating Station1409000896 Duke Energy Indiana, Madison Generating Station1409000896 Duke Energy Indiana, Madison Generating Station1409000896 Duke Energy Indiana, Madison Generating Station1409000896 Duke Energy Indiana, Madison Generating Station1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409010006 AK Steel Corporation1409030403 MB MANUFACTURING CORPORATION1409030403 MB MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

Page 29: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1409030403 MB MANUFACTURING CORPORATION1409030403 MB MANUFACTURING CORPORATION1409030403 MB MANUFACTURING CORPORATION1409030403 MB MANUFACTURING CORPORATION1409030403 MB MANUFACTURING CORPORATION1409030403 MB MANUFACTURING CORPORATION1409030403 MB MANUFACTURING CORPORATION1409040212 Smart Papers - Hamilton Mill1409040212 Smart Papers - Hamilton Mill1409040212 Smart Papers - Hamilton Mill1409040212 Smart Papers - Hamilton Mill1409040243 City of Hamilton Department of Public Utilities1409040243 City of Hamilton Department of Public Utilities1409040883 Trans-Acc, Inc.1409040883 Trans-Acc, Inc.1409090081 Miami University1409090081 Miami University1409090081 Miami University1409090081 Miami University1409090081 Miami University1409090081 Miami University1409120656 Duke Energy Kentucky, Woodsdale Generating Station1409120656 Duke Energy Kentucky, Woodsdale Generating Station1409120656 Duke Energy Kentucky, Woodsdale Generating Station1409120656 Duke Energy Kentucky, Woodsdale Generating Station1409950970 SK CONSTRUCTION CO1413090154 W. H. Zimmer Power Station1413090154 W. H. Zimmer Power Station1413090154 W. H. Zimmer Power Station1413090154 W. H. Zimmer Power Station1413090154 W. H. Zimmer Power Station1413090154 W. H. Zimmer Power Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1413100008 Duke Energy Ohio, W.C. Beckjord Station1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation

Page 30: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431010054 INEOS ABS (USA) Corporation1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070035 BASF Corp1431070039 Emerald Performance Materials, LLC1431070039 Emerald Performance Materials, LLC1431070039 Emerald Performance Materials, LLC1431070624 Kao USA Inc.1431070624 Kao USA Inc.1431070849 University of Cincinnati1431070849 University of Cincinnati1431070849 University of Cincinnati1431070849 University of Cincinnati1431070849 University of Cincinnati1431070849 University of Cincinnati1431070849 University of Cincinnati1431070849 University of Cincinnati1431070849 University of Cincinnati1431070944 Mill Creek WWTP1431070944 Mill Creek WWTP1431070944 Mill Creek WWTP1431070944 Mill Creek WWTP1431070944 Mill Creek WWTP1431070944 Mill Creek WWTP1431073227 BUCKEYE TERMINALS LLC CINCINNATI TERMINA1431074278 Emery Oleochemicals LLC1431074278 Emery Oleochemicals LLC1431074278 Emery Oleochemicals LLC1431074278 Emery Oleochemicals LLC

Page 31: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1431092049 Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc.1431092049 Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc.1431140014 Barrett Paving Materials Inc1431140014 Barrett Paving Materials Inc1431170674 PakLab1431170674 PakLab1431340460 B-Way Corporation1431340460 B-Way Corporation1431340460 B-Way Corporation1431340460 B-Way Corporation1431340977 Senco Products Inc.1431340977 Senco Products Inc.1431340977 Senco Products Inc.1431340977 Senco Products Inc.1431340977 Senco Products Inc.1431340977 Senco Products Inc.1431350064 Agrium North Bend Nitrogen Operations1431350093 Miami Fort Power Station1431350093 Miami Fort Power Station1431350093 Miami Fort Power Station1431350093 Miami Fort Power Station1431350093 Miami Fort Power Station1431350093 Miami Fort Power Station1431370116 MCC-Norwood, LLC1431370116 MCC-Norwood, LLC1431370116 MCC-Norwood, LLC1431370116 MCC-Norwood, LLC1431370116 MCC-Norwood, LLC1431370249 UNITED STATES PLAYING CARD CO.1431394148 DTE St. Bernard, LLC1431394148 DTE St. Bernard, LLC1431394148 DTE St. Bernard, LLC1431394148 DTE St. Bernard, LLC1431483219 FLINT GROUP PIGMENTS1431483219 FLINT GROUP PIGMENTS1431483219 FLINT GROUP PIGMENTS1431483219 FLINT GROUP PIGMENTS1483000144 Lebanon Compressor Station1483000144 Lebanon Compressor Station1483000144 Lebanon Compressor Station1483000144 Lebanon Compressor Station1483000144 Lebanon Compressor Station1483000144 Lebanon Compressor Station1483000144 Lebanon Compressor Station1483000144 Lebanon Compressor Station1483000170 MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LP - LEBANON1483040007 IKO Production Inc.1483040007 IKO Production Inc.1483040192 PHARMACIA HEPAR LLC1483040192 PHARMACIA HEPAR LLC1483040201 Atlas Roofing Corporation, Franklin Roofing Facility1483060110 Enterprise Refined Products Company LLC1483060328 Texas Eastern Transmission - Lebanon1483060328 Texas Eastern Transmission - Lebanon

Page 32: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1483060328 Texas Eastern Transmission - Lebanon1483980456 Barrett Paving Materials Inc.1483980456 Barrett Paving Materials Inc.1483980456 Barrett Paving Materials Inc.1483980456 Barrett Paving Materials Inc.1483980456 Barrett Paving Materials Inc.1483980456 Barrett Paving Materials Inc.1576000082 New Castle Refractories Company1576000082 New Castle Refractories Company1576000082 New Castle Refractories Company1576000082 New Castle Refractories Company1576002007 Marathon Petroleum Company LP - Canton Terminal1576002007 Marathon Petroleum Company LP - Canton Terminal1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576010014 Alliance Casting Co. LLC1576050694 Republic Steel1576050694 Republic Steel1576050694 Republic Steel1576050694 Republic Steel1576050694 Republic Steel1576050694 Republic Steel1576050694 Republic Steel1576080056 The Longaberger Company1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050013 Medina Hospital

Page 33: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050013 Medina Hospital1652050040 Owens Corning Roofing and Asphalt, LLC1652050221 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5161652050221 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5161652050221 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5161652050221 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5161652050221 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5161652050221 Kokosing Materials, Inc. Plant 5161667010021 Guttman Realty Co dba Bulk Terminal Stor1667060129 QUIKRETE - CLEVELAND1667060141 Aluminum Wheel Technologies Inc1667060141 Aluminum Wheel Technologies Inc1677010027 Cargill, Incorporated - Salt Division (Akron, OH)1677010029 Emerald Performance Materials, LLC1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010757 City of Akron Steam Generating1677010830 Integrated Roll Services1677020009 PPG INDUSTRIES - BARBERTON PLANT1677020009 PPG INDUSTRIES - BARBERTON PLANT1677020009 PPG INDUSTRIES - BARBERTON PLANT1677120065 DERMA MED COATINGS LLC

Page 34: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

ADDRESS CITY ZIP5 ZIP4550 Liberty Rd Delaware 43015550 Liberty Rd Delaware 43015550 Liberty Rd Delaware 43015550 Liberty Rd Delaware 43015550 Liberty Rd Delaware 43015550 Liberty Rd Delaware 43015550 Liberty Rd Delaware 43015550 Liberty Rd Delaware 43015550 Liberty Rd Delaware 43015401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 3371401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 3371401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 3371401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 3371401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 3371401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 3371401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 3371401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 3371401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 3371401 North Ewing Street Lancaster 43130 33712351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431602351 Kenskill Avenue Washington Court House 431606380 Canal Street Canal Winchester 43110 96406380 Canal Street Canal Winchester 43110 96406380 Canal Street Canal Winchester 43110 96406380 Canal Street Canal Winchester 43110 96406380 Canal Street Canal Winchester 43110 96402211 Parsons Avenue Columbus 43207 23862211 Parsons Avenue Columbus 43207 23862211 Parsons Avenue Columbus 43207 23862211 Parsons Avenue Columbus 43207 23862211 Parsons Avenue Columbus 43207 23862211 Parsons Avenue Columbus 43207 23862211 Parsons Avenue Columbus 43207 23862211 Parsons Avenue Columbus 43207 23862211 Parsons Avenue Columbus 43207 23861313 WINDSOR AVENUE Columbus 432111313 WINDSOR AVENUE Columbus 432111313 WINDSOR AVENUE Columbus 432111313 WINDSOR AVENUE Columbus 43211

Page 35: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1313 WINDSOR AVENUE Columbus 432111313 WINDSOR AVENUE Columbus 432111313 WINDSOR AVENUE Columbus 43211324 DERING AVENUE COLUMBUS 43207324 DERING AVENUE COLUMBUS 43207324 DERING AVENUE COLUMBUS 43207324 DERING AVENUE COLUMBUS 43207835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 43219835 N. Cassady Ave. Columbus 432191975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 43207

Page 36: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071975 Watkins Road Columbus 432071770 Joyce Avenue Columbus 43219 10264051 FONDORF DR Columbus 432284051 FONDORF DR Columbus 432284051 FONDORF DR Columbus 432284051 FONDORF DR Columbus 432284051 FONDORF DR Columbus 432284051 FONDORF DR Columbus 43228395 Frank Road Columbus 432072003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12682003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12682003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12682003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12682003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12682003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12682003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12682003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12682003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12682003 MILLIKIN ROAD Columbus 43210 12681385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432301385 Blatt Boulevard Gahanna 432306326 County Highway 61 Upper Sandusky 433516326 County Highway 61 Upper Sandusky 433516326 County Highway 61 Upper Sandusky 43351

Page 37: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

6326 County Highway 61 Upper Sandusky 433516326 County Highway 61 Upper Sandusky 433516326 County Highway 61 Upper Sandusky 433511330 Coshocton Rd Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050100 BLACKJACK RD Mount Vernon 43050Central Heating Plant Granville 43023 0613Central Heating Plant Granville 43023 0613Central Heating Plant Granville 43023 0613Central Heating Plant Granville 43023 0613611 O'Neill Drive Hebron 43025581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687

Page 38: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 9687581 Milliken Drive, S.E. Hebron 43025 968710500 O'Day-Harrison Rd Mount Sterling 43143 947410500 O'Day-Harrison Rd Mount Sterling 43143 9474420 East High Street London 43140420 East High Street London 43140420 East High Street London 43140

Page 39: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

420 East High Street London 43140420 East High Street London 43140420 East High Street London 43140420 East High Street London 43140420 East High Street London 43140420 East High Street London 43140420 East High Street London 43140420 East High Street London 43140559 Pittsburgh Road Circleville 43113559 Pittsburgh Road Circleville 43113559 Pittsburgh Road Circleville 4311319522 London Road Circleville 4311319522 London Road Circleville 4311319522 London Road Circleville 4311319522 London Road Circleville 4311319522 London Road Circleville 4311319522 London Road Circleville 4311324000 Honda Parkway Marysville 43040 925114111 Scottslawn Road Marysville 4304114111 Scottslawn Road Marysville 4304114111 Scottslawn Road Marysville 4304114111 Scottslawn Road Marysville 4304114111 Scottslawn Road Marysville 4304114111 Scottslawn Road Marysville 43041Route 20 & Harmon Road North Kingsville 44068 02812133 Lake Road Ashtabula 44004 0000E FIFTH ST Ashtabula 440044001 Benefit Ave Ashtabula 440054001 Benefit Ave Ashtabula 440054001 Benefit Ave Ashtabula 440054001 Benefit Ave Ashtabula 440054001 Benefit Ave Ashtabula 440052925 MFG Place Ashtabula 440042029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 0000

Page 40: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

2029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00002029 Cobbler Road NE Carrollton 44615 00008152 Bay Road SE Carrollton 446158152 Bay Road SE Carrollton 446158152 Bay Road SE Carrollton 446158152 Bay Road SE Carrollton 446158152 Bay Road SE Carrollton 446158152 Bay Road SE Carrollton 44615131 EAST RAILROAD ST Columbiana 44408131 EAST RAILROAD ST Columbiana 4440816052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406216052 INDUSTRIAL PKWY Middlefield 4406215535 S STATE AVE MIDDLEFIELD 4406215535 S STATE AVE MIDDLEFIELD 4406215535 S STATE AVE MIDDLEFIELD 4406215535 S STATE AVE MIDDLEFIELD 4406215535 S STATE AVE MIDDLEFIELD 4406215535 S STATE AVE MIDDLEFIELD 44062155 Freedom Road Painesville 44077 1234155 Freedom Road Painesville 44077 1234670 Hardy Road Painesville 44077670 Hardy Road Painesville 44077670 Hardy Road Painesville 44077670 Hardy Road Painesville 44077110 Third Street Fairport Harbor 44077110 Third Street Fairport Harbor 44077110 Third Street Fairport Harbor 44077110 Third Street Fairport Harbor 4407715 Williams Street Grand River 44045

Page 41: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

15 Williams Street Grand River 4404515 Williams Street Grand River 4404515 Williams Street Grand River 440451 WILLIAMS ST GRAND RIVER 4404510 ERIE ROAD Eastlake 4409510 ERIE ROAD Eastlake 4409510 ERIE ROAD Eastlake 4409510 ERIE ROAD Eastlake 4409510 ERIE ROAD Eastlake 4409533570 Lake Road Avon Lake 44012 000033570 Lake Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 0000650 Miller Road Avon Lake 44012 00001807 E. 28th Street Lorain 440551807 E. 28th Street Lorain 440551807 E. 28th Street Lorain 440551807 E. 28th Street Lorain 440551807 E. 28th Street Lorain 440551807 E. 28th Street Lorain 44055173 W. Lorain St. Oberlin 44074 1092173 W. Lorain St. Oberlin 44074 1092173 W. Lorain St. Oberlin 44074 1092173 W. Lorain St. Oberlin 44074 1092173 W. Lorain St. Oberlin 44074 1092173 W. Lorain St. Oberlin 44074 109215650 State Route 511 Oberlin 4407415650 State Route 511 Oberlin 4407415650 State Route 511 Oberlin 4407415650 State Route 511 Oberlin 4407413484 Youngstown Pittsburgh Rd. Springfield Twp. 444547060 CRORY RD CANFIELD 444067060 CRORY RD CANFIELD 444067060 CRORY RD CANFIELD 444065455 GARFIELD RD Springfield Twp. 4445465 Main Street Struthers 4447165 Main Street Struthers 44471

Page 42: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1140 BEARS DEN RD YOUNGSTOWN 44511One Performance Place Youngstown 44502One Performance Place Youngstown 44502One Performance Place Youngstown 44502One Performance Place Youngstown 44502999 Pine Ave., S.E. Warren 44883 6528999 Pine Ave., S.E. Warren 44883 6528999 Pine Ave., S.E. Warren 44883 6528999 Pine Ave., S.E. Warren 44883 6528706 South State Street Girard 44420706 South State Street Girard 444201047 Belmont Ave. Niles 44446 13561047 Belmont Ave. Niles 44446 1356750 S MAIN ST NILES 44446412 Mason Street Niles 44446412 MCKEES LN Niles 463221721 PINE AVE SE Warren 444831721 PINE AVE SE Warren 444831901 Pine Avenue SE Warren 444831901 Pine Avenue SE Warren 444831901 Pine Avenue SE Warren 444831901 Pine Avenue SE Warren 444831901 Pine Avenue SE Warren 444831901 Pine Avenue SE Warren 444831901 Pine Avenue SE Warren 444831901 Pine Avenue SE Warren 444831901 Pine Avenue SE Warren 4448318228 FULTON RD MARSHALLVILLE 4464517045 Galehouse Road Doylestown 442301200 North Main Street Orrville 44667 00581200 North Main Street Orrville 44667 00581200 North Main Street Orrville 44667 00581200 North Main Street Orrville 44667 00581200 North Main Street Orrville 44667 00581200 North Main Street Orrville 44667 00581200 North Main Street Orrville 44667 00581100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 44667

Page 43: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 446671100 North Main Street Orrville 44667510 COLLINS BLVD Orrville 44667510 COLLINS BLVD Orrville 44667580 East Wayne Ave. Wooster 446917680 Ottawa Rd. Cairo 45820 03107680 Ottawa Rd. Cairo 45820 0310320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 45817320 Snider Road Bluffton 458171150 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041150 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041150 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041150 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041150 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041150 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041150 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041150 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251155 Buckeye Road Lima 45804 18251220 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041220 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041220 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041220 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041220 South Metcalf Street Lima 458041208 Masters Avenue Ashland 448051208 Masters Avenue Ashland 448051208 Masters Avenue Ashland 448051208 Masters Avenue Ashland 448051208 Masters Avenue Ashland 448051208 Masters Avenue Ashland 44805

Page 44: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

240 West Fifth Street Minster 45865 1065240 West Fifth Street Minster 45865 1065335 NORTH CHESTNUT STREET St. Marys 45885 1705335 NORTH CHESTNUT STREET St. Marys 45885 1705335 NORTH CHESTNUT STREET St. Marys 45885 1705335 NORTH CHESTNUT STREET St. Marys 45885 1705335 NORTH CHESTNUT STREET St. Marys 45885 17054580 Bethel Road Bucyrus 44820State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512

Page 45: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512State Route 281 East Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512408 PERRY STREET Defiance 43512

Page 46: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 43512925 Carpenter Road Defiance 435126357 State Route 66 North Defiance 435126357 State Route 66 North Defiance 435126357 State Route 66 North Defiance 435126357 State Route 66 North Defiance 435129220 Portland Road Sandusky 448706767 County Road 9 Delta 435156767 County Road 9 Delta 435156767 County Road 9 Delta 435156767 County Road 9 Delta 435156767 County Road 9 Delta 435156767 County Road 9 Delta 435156767 County Road 9 Delta 435156767 County Road 9 Delta 43515800 W Barre Road ARCHBOLD 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 43502502 MIDDLE STREET Archbold 435024901 North Main Street Findlay 458404901 North Main Street Findlay 458404901 North Main Street Findlay 458404901 North Main Street Findlay 4584012-733 St Route 110 Napoleon 4354512-733 St Route 110 Napoleon 4354512-733 St Route 110 Napoleon 43545Campbell Soup Company LLC Napoleon 43545

Page 47: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Campbell Soup Company LLC Napoleon 43545Campbell Soup Company LLC Napoleon 43545Campbell Soup Company LLC Napoleon 43545Campbell Soup Company LLC Napoleon 43545Campbell Soup Company LLC Napoleon 43545Campbell Soup Company LLC Napoleon 43545Campbell Soup Company LLC Napoleon 43545Campbell Soup Company LLC Napoleon 4354511800 State Route 424 East Napoleon 4354511800 State Route 424 East Napoleon 43545P.O Box 348 Norwalk 448571145 Conwell Avenue Willard 44890Glen-Gery Corporation Caledonia 43314Glen-Gery Corporation Caledonia 43314Glen-Gery Corporation Caledonia 43314912 Cheney Avenue Marion 43301 1801912 Cheney Avenue Marion 43301 1801912 Cheney Avenue Marion 43301 1801912 Cheney Avenue Marion 43301 1801912 Cheney Avenue Marion 43301 1801121 South Lake Street Gypsum 43433121 South Lake Street Gypsum 43433121 South Lake Street Gypsum 43433121 South Lake Street Gypsum 43433121 South Lake Street Gypsum 43433170 Noble Road East Shiloh 44878170 Noble Road East Shiloh 44878335 Glessner Avenue Mansfield 44903335 Glessner Avenue Mansfield 449032384 STATE ROUTE 39N MANSFIELD 449032384 STATE ROUTE 39N MANSFIELD 4490334 Mansfield Ave. Shelby 44875 031134 Mansfield Ave. Shelby 44875 031134 Mansfield Ave. Shelby 44875 03113964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353964 County Rd 41 Helena 434353956 S R 412 Vickery 434643956 S R 412 Vickery 434643956 S R 412 Vickery 434643956 S R 412 Vickery 43464324 4TH AVENUE TIFFIN 44883234 S. Jefferson Street Delphos 45833

Page 48: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

234 S. Jefferson Street Delphos 45833234 S. Jefferson Street Delphos 458332625 East Broadway Street Northwood 4361912580 Greensburg Pike Portage 4345112580 Greensburg Pike Portage 434516255 U.S. Highway 23 South Risingsun 43457400 Van Camp Road Bowling Green 43402400 Van Camp Road Bowling Green 434022915 County Road 96 Carey 43316North Patterson Street Carey 43316North Patterson Street Carey 43316North Patterson Street Carey 43316North Patterson Street Carey 43316North Patterson Street Carey 433167150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 433517150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 433517150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 433517150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 433517150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 433517150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 433517150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 433517150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 433517150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 433517150 SH 199 Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 43351235 Commerce Way Upper Sandusky 433516050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 435666050 River Road Waterville 4356610300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 43528

Page 49: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

10300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 4352810300 INDUSTRIAL ROAD Holland 435281201 Buckeye Street Toledo 436111201 Buckeye Street Toledo 436111201 Buckeye Street Toledo 436111201 Buckeye Street Toledo 436111201 Buckeye Street Toledo 436111201 Buckeye Street Toledo 436111201 Buckeye Street Toledo 436113729 Twining Street Toledo 43608 13153729 Twining Street Toledo 43608 13153729 Twining Street Toledo 43608 13151819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436161819 Woodville Road Oregon 436166175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436126175 AMERICAN RD. Toledo 436123228 Hill Ave Toledo 436074701 Bay Shore Road Oregon 43616 0000

Page 50: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

4701 Bay Shore Road Oregon 43616 00004701 Bay Shore Road Oregon 43616 00004701 Bay Shore Road Oregon 43616 00004001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436974001 Cedar Point Road Oregon 436971400 Otter Creek Road Oregon 43616 12321400 Otter Creek Road Oregon 43616 12322226 NAVARRE RD Oregon 43616

Page 51: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

2226 NAVARRE RD Oregon 436162226 NAVARRE RD Oregon 436162226 NAVARRE RD Oregon 436162226 NAVARRE RD Oregon 436162226 NAVARRE RD Oregon 436162226 NAVARRE RD Oregon 436162226 NAVARRE RD Oregon 436165010 Stickney Ave. Toledo 436121000 Jeep Parkway Toledo 43610140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 1215140 Dixie Highway Rossford 43460 12151025 NORTH WASHINGTON ST. Greenfield 451231025 NORTH WASHINGTON ST. Greenfield 451231025 NORTH WASHINGTON ST. Greenfield 451231025 NORTH WASHINGTON ST. Greenfield 451231025 NORTH WASHINGTON ST. Greenfield 451231147 North Washington St. Greenfield 451231147 North Washington St. Greenfield 451231147 North Washington St. Greenfield 451231147 North Washington St. Greenfield 451231147 North Washington St. Greenfield 451231147 North Washington St. Greenfield 451231147 North Washington St. Greenfield 451231147 North Washington St. Greenfield 451238591 Mad River Rd Hillsboro 451338591 Mad River Rd Hillsboro 451338591 Mad River Rd Hillsboro 451338591 Mad River Rd Hillsboro 451338591 Mad River Rd Hillsboro 451338591 Mad River Rd Hillsboro 451336964 State Route 235 North Russells Point 4334811000 St. Rt. 347 East Liberty 43319 940711000 St. Rt. 347 East Liberty 43319 94071215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 1692

Page 52: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 16921215 GREENWOOD ST Bellefontaine 43311 169212500 Meranda Road Anna 45302 969912500 Meranda Road Anna 45302 969912500 Meranda Road Anna 45302 96991167 S FOURTH AVE Sidney 453651167 S FOURTH AVE Sidney 453651167 S FOURTH AVE Sidney 45365456 S. Stolle Avenue Sidney 45365 8846456 S. Stolle Avenue Sidney 45365 88462335 US Route 50 West Albany 45710 00002335 US Route 50 West Albany 45710 00002335 US Route 50 West Albany 45710 00002335 US Route 50 West Albany 45710 000038824 National Road West Bethesda 4371938824 National Road West Bethesda 4371938824 National Road West Bethesda 4371938824 National Road West Bethesda 4371938824 National Road West Bethesda 4371938824 National Road West Bethesda 4371957246 Ferry Landing Road Shadyside 43947 970057246 Ferry Landing Road Shadyside 43947 970057246 Ferry Landing Road Shadyside 43947 970057246 Ferry Landing Road Shadyside 43947 970057246 Ferry Landing Road Shadyside 43947 970047201 County Road 273 Conesville 43811 979947201 County Road 273 Conesville 43811 979947201 County Road 273 Conesville 43811 979947201 County Road 273 Conesville 43811 979947201 County Road 273 Conesville 43811 9799500 North Fourth Street Coshocton 438122266 South Sixth Street Coshocton 43812 60012266 South Sixth Street Coshocton 43812 60012266 South Sixth Street Coshocton 43812 60015758 State Route 7 North Cheshire 456205758 State Route 7 North Cheshire 456205758 State Route 7 North Cheshire 456205758 State Route 7 North Cheshire 456205758 State Route 7 North Cheshire 45620KYGER CREEK GENERATING STATION Addison Twp. 456313428 Clay Pike Road Cumberland 437323428 Clay Pike Road Cumberland 437323428 Clay Pike Road Cumberland 437323428 Clay Pike Road Cumberland 437323428 Clay Pike Road Cumberland 437323428 Clay Pike Road Cumberland 43732

Page 53: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

110 N. 8th Street Byesville 43723110 N. 8th Street Byesville 43723110 N. 8th Street Byesville 43723110 N. 8th Street Byesville 43723110 N. 8th Street Byesville 4372360790 Southgate Road Cambridge 43725515 E. MAIN ST. Bowerston 44695Flemming Rd., County Rd. 52 Jewett 4398637561 Wandling Rd Haydenville 2241937561 Wandling Rd Haydenville 2241937561 Wandling Rd Haydenville 2241937561 Wandling Rd Haydenville 2241937561 Wandling Rd Haydenville 2241937561 Wandling Rd Haydenville 22419Athens & Chillicothe Jackson 45640 0327Athens & Chillicothe Jackson 45640 0327Athens & Chillicothe Jackson 45640 0327Athens & Chillicothe Jackson 45640 0327960 E. Main Street Jackson 45640960 E. Main Street Jackson 45640960 E. Main Street Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 4564016064 Beaver Pike Jackson 45640306 County Road 7 East Brilliant 43913 1088306 County Road 7 East Brilliant 43913 1088306 County Road 7 East Brilliant 43913 1088306 County Road 7 East Brilliant 43913 1088306 County Road 7 East Brilliant 43913 1088306 County Road 7 East Brilliant 43913 1088306 County Road 7 East Brilliant 43913 1088306 County Road 7 East Brilliant 43913 1088306 County Road 7 East Brilliant 43913 1088

Page 54: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 43938540 Commercial Ave Mingo Junction 4393829503 State Rte 7 Stratton 43961 000029503 State Rte 7 Stratton 43961 000029503 State Rte 7 Stratton 43961 000029503 State Rte 7 Stratton 43961 000029503 State Rte 7 Stratton 43961 000029503 State Rte 7 Stratton 43961 000029503 State Rte 7 Stratton 43961 0000100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 0309100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 0309100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 0309100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 0309100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 0309100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 0309100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 0309100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 0309100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 0309100 Titanium Way Toronto 43964 030943840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 4393143840 State Route 7 Hannibal 439313200 Jackson Pike Grove City 431233200 Jackson Pike Grove City 431233200 Jackson Pike Grove City 431233200 Jackson Pike Grove City 431233200 Jackson Pike Grove City 43123

Page 55: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3200 Jackson Pike Grove City 431231724 Linden Avenue Zanesville 43701 23001724 Linden Avenue Zanesville 43701 23001700 State Street Zanesville 437011700 State Street Zanesville 437011700 State Street Zanesville 437011700 State Street Zanesville 437011700 State Street Zanesville 437011700 State Street Zanesville 4370172607 Gun Club Road St. Clairsville 439504620 LIMESTONE VALLEY RD Zanesville 4370142660 DEERSVILLE RIDGE RD Cadiz 439078900 Fleming Road Jewett 4398689000 Fleming Road Jewett 43986Route 345 Zanesville 4370142600 Deersville Road Cadiz 4390717153 CR 57 Caldwell 4372417153 CR 57 Caldwell 4372417153 CR 57 Caldwell 4372417153 CR 57 Caldwell 437243415 Township Road 447 Glenford 437393415 Township Road 447 Glenford 437399702 Ironpoint Road Shawnee 437829702 Ironpoint Road Shawnee 437822446 Glass Rock Road Glenford 437394900 W. 150th St. Cleveland 441354900 W. 150th St. Cleveland 441354900 W. 150th St. Cleveland 441354900 W. 150th St. Cleveland 441354900 W. 150th St. Cleveland 441354900 W. 150th St. Cleveland 441353930 U.S. Route 23 South Piketon 45661 0628423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690423 Hopewell Road Waverly 45690232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601

Page 56: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601232 East 8TH St. Chillicothe 45601475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430475 Dover Road Sugarcreek 44681 0430State Route 800 N East Sparta 4462635748 ST. RT. 93 Hamden 4563435748 ST. RT. 93 Hamden 456341501 Sparling Road Waterford 45786110 Blue Knob Road Marietta 457502419 State Route 618 Belpre 45714 023511135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 949611135 State Route 7 Belpre 45714 9496655 River Lane Marietta 45750655 River Lane Marietta 4575016705 State Route 7 Marietta 44750

Page 57: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

16705 State Route 7 Marietta 4475016705 State Route 7 Marietta 4475016705 State Route 7 Marietta 4475016705 State Route 7 Marietta 4475016705 State Route 7 Marietta 4475016705 State Route 7 Marietta 4475016705 State Route 7 Marietta 4475016705 State Route 7 Marietta 4475017005 State Route 7 Marietta 4575017005 State Route 7 Marietta 4575017005 State Route 7 Marietta 45750745 U.S. Route 52 Aberdeen 451011395 County Rd 1A Ironton 456381395 County Rd 1A Ironton 456381395 County Rd 1A Ironton 456381395 County Rd 1A Ironton 456381019 Haverhill-Ohio Furnace Road Haverhill 45636 01271019 Haverhill-Ohio Furnace Road Haverhill 45636 0127Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388Jct. Rt. 23 South & Rt. 52 East / West Portsmouth 45662 1388202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 45662202 VINE ST NEW BOSTON 456621250 MARTIN ST Greenville 45331180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332

Page 58: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332180 MIKESELL RD Hollansburg 45332747 XENIA DRIVE FAIRBORN 453243250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 453853250 Linebaugh Road Xenia 4538588 ABW/CEVY Wright-Patterson AFB 45433 520988 ABW/CEVY Wright-Patterson AFB 45433 520988 ABW/CEVY Wright-Patterson AFB 45433 520988 ABW/CEVY Wright-Patterson AFB 45433 520988 ABW/CEVY Wright-Patterson AFB 45433 520988 ABW/CEVY Wright-Patterson AFB 45433 520988 ABW/CEVY Wright-Patterson AFB 45433 520988 ABW/CEVY Wright-Patterson AFB 45433 5209482 Trebein Rd. Xenia 45385482 Trebein Rd. Xenia 45385482 Trebein Rd. Xenia 45385482 Trebein Rd. Xenia 45385482 Trebein Rd. Xenia 45385482 Trebein Rd. Xenia 453851985 WEST STANFIELD ROAD Troy 453731985 WEST STANFIELD ROAD Troy 45373621 BRANDT ST DAYTON 454042701 Home Avenue Dayton 454172701 Home Avenue Dayton 454172701 Home Avenue Dayton 454172701 Home Avenue Dayton 454172701 Home Avenue Dayton 454172701 Home Avenue Dayton 454172701 Home Avenue Dayton 454172701 Home Avenue Dayton 454172701 Home Avenue Dayton 454172701 Home Avenue Dayton 454173201 Needmore Road Dayton 45413 8001

Page 59: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

5600 Brentlinger Dr. Dayton 45414 35975600 Brentlinger Dr. Dayton 45414 35975600 Brentlinger Dr. Dayton 45414 35975600 Brentlinger Dr. Dayton 45414 35975600 Brentlinger Dr. Dayton 45414 35975600 Brentlinger Dr. Dayton 45414 359724 BYRNES LAKE CT Dayton 4514224 BYRNES LAKE CT Dayton 4514224 BYRNES LAKE CT Dayton 451422555 Woodman Drive Kettering 454202555 Woodman Drive Kettering 454202555 Woodman Drive Kettering 454202555 Woodman Drive Kettering 454202555 Woodman Drive Kettering 454202555 Woodman Drive Kettering 454209200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 41039200 Chautauqua Road Miamisburg 45432 410310 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 4538110 S ELECTRIC ST WEST ALEXANDRIA 45381

Page 60: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

4181 BRADLEY RD Cleveland 441094181 BRADLEY RD Cleveland 441096800 South Marginal Road Cleveland 441031921 Hamilton Avenue Cleveland 44114 35151921 Hamilton Avenue Cleveland 44114 35151921 Hamilton Avenue Cleveland 44114 35153060 Eggers Avenue Cleveland 441053060 Eggers Avenue Cleveland 44105Day-Glo Color Corp. Cleveland 44103Day-Glo Color Corp. Cleveland 44103Day-Glo Color Corp. Cleveland 44103Day-Glo Color Corp. Cleveland 441034600 HEIDTMAN PARKWAY CLEVELAND 44105640 NORTH ROCKY RIVER DR. Berea 440175600 Henry Ford Blvd Brook Park 44142 15264150 East 56th Street Cleveland 44101 15504300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10044300 East 49th Street Cuyahoga Heights 44125 10046000 Canal Road Cuyahoga Heights 441258900 Hemlock Road Independence 44131 00008900 Hemlock Road Independence 44131 00008900 Hemlock Road Independence 44131 00008900 Hemlock Road Independence 44131 00008900 Hemlock Road Independence 44131 00008900 Hemlock Road Independence 44131 00008900 Hemlock Road Independence 44131 00008900 Hemlock Road Independence 44131 000011709 Madison Ave Lakewood 4410711709 Madison Ave Lakewood 4410711709 Madison Ave Lakewood 4410711709 Madison Ave Lakewood 4410711709 Madison Ave Lakewood 4410711709 Madison Ave Lakewood 441077250 DIVISION ST Bedford 441467250 DIVISION ST Bedford 4414612900 SNOW RD Parma 44130 101212900 SNOW RD Parma 44130 101212900 SNOW RD Parma 44130 101212900 SNOW RD Parma 44130 101212900 SNOW RD Parma 44130 1012Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139

Page 61: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 44139Cochran and Solon Roads Solon 441391000 Crocker Rd. Westlake 441451000 Crocker Rd. Westlake 441451000 Crocker Rd. Westlake 4414514909 ARDEN AVENUE Lakewood 44107222 W OXFORD STATE ROAD Middletown 45042222 W OXFORD STATE ROAD Middletown 45042222 W OXFORD STATE ROAD Middletown 45042222 W OXFORD STATE ROAD Middletown 45042222 W OXFORD STATE ROAD Middletown 45042222 W OXFORD STATE ROAD Middletown 450422525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97602525 WAYNE MADISON ROAD Trenton 45067 97606163 Allen Road West Chester Twp. 450695657 Kennel Road Trenton 450675657 Kennel Road Trenton 450675657 Kennel Road Trenton 450675657 Kennel Road Trenton 450675657 Kennel Road Trenton 450675657 Kennel Road Trenton 450675657 Kennel Road Trenton 450675657 Kennel Road Trenton 450671801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00011801 Crawford Street Middletown 45043 00012904 SYMMES ROAD FAIRFIELD 450142904 SYMMES ROAD FAIRFIELD 45014

Page 62: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

2904 SYMMES ROAD FAIRFIELD 450142904 SYMMES ROAD FAIRFIELD 450142904 SYMMES ROAD FAIRFIELD 450142904 SYMMES ROAD FAIRFIELD 450142904 SYMMES ROAD FAIRFIELD 450142904 SYMMES ROAD FAIRFIELD 450142904 SYMMES ROAD FAIRFIELD 45014601 North 'B' Street Hamilton 45013 2909601 North 'B' Street Hamilton 45013 2909601 North 'B' Street Hamilton 45013 2909601 North 'B' Street Hamilton 45013 2909960 North Third Street Hamilton 45011960 North Third Street Hamilton 450111005 South 9th Street Hamilton 450111005 South 9th Street Hamilton 45011Cole Service Building Oxford 45056Cole Service Building Oxford 45056Cole Service Building Oxford 45056Cole Service Building Oxford 45056Cole Service Building Oxford 45056Cole Service Building Oxford 450562100 Woodsdale Road Trenton 45067 00002100 Woodsdale Road Trenton 45067 00002100 Woodsdale Road Trenton 45067 00002100 Woodsdale Road Trenton 45067 00002514 ATCO AVENUE PO BOX 44930 Middletown 45044 09301781 US Route 52 Moscow 45153 97051781 US Route 52 Moscow 45153 97051781 US Route 52 Moscow 45153 97051781 US Route 52 Moscow 45153 97051781 US Route 52 Moscow 45153 97051781 US Route 52 Moscow 45153 9705757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709757 US Route 52 New Richmond 45157 9709356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039

Page 63: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 0039356 Three Rivers Parkway Addyston 45001 00394900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14912235 Langdon Farm Rd. Cincinnati 45237 47122235 Langdon Farm Rd. Cincinnati 45237 47122235 Langdon Farm Rd. Cincinnati 45237 47122535 Spring Grove Avenue Cincinnati 45214 17732535 Spring Grove Avenue Cincinnati 45214 1773Clifton Campus Cincinnati 45221Clifton Campus Cincinnati 45221Clifton Campus Cincinnati 45221Clifton Campus Cincinnati 45221Clifton Campus Cincinnati 45221Clifton Campus Cincinnati 45221Clifton Campus Cincinnati 45221Clifton Campus Cincinnati 45221Clifton Campus Cincinnati 452211600 Gest Street Cincinnati 45204 20961600 Gest Street Cincinnati 45204 20961600 Gest Street Cincinnati 45204 20961600 Gest Street Cincinnati 45204 20961600 Gest Street Cincinnati 45204 20961600 Gest Street Cincinnati 45204 20965150 River Rd Cincinnati 452334900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 14914900 Este Avenue Cincinnati 45232 1491

Page 64: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

10795 Hughes Road Cincinnati 45251 459810795 Hughes Road Cincinnati 45251 45989550 Valley Junction Road Cleves 450029550 Valley Junction Road Cleves 45002470 Northland Blvd. Cincinnati 45240470 Northland Blvd. Cincinnati 452408200 Broadwell Road Cincinnati 452448200 Broadwell Road Cincinnati 452448200 Broadwell Road Cincinnati 452448200 Broadwell Road Cincinnati 452448450 BROADWELL RD. Cincinnati 45244 16118450 BROADWELL RD. Cincinnati 45244 16118450 BROADWELL RD. Cincinnati 45244 16118450 BROADWELL RD. Cincinnati 45244 16118450 BROADWELL RD. Cincinnati 45244 16118450 BROADWELL RD. Cincinnati 45244 161110743 Brower Rd. North Bend 45052 015811021 Brower Road North Bend 45052 012811021 Brower Road North Bend 45052 012811021 Brower Road North Bend 45052 012811021 Brower Road North Bend 45052 012811021 Brower Road North Bend 45052 012811021 Brower Road North Bend 45052 01284500 Beech Street Norwood 45212 10494500 Beech Street Norwood 45212 10494500 Beech Street Norwood 45212 10494500 Beech Street Norwood 45212 10494500 Beech Street Norwood 45212 10494590 BEECH ST Norwood 452125189 Spring Grove Avenue Cincinnati 452175189 Spring Grove Avenue Cincinnati 452175189 Spring Grove Avenue Cincinnati 452175189 Spring Grove Avenue Cincinnati 45217410 GLENDALE-MILFORD ROAD Cincinnati 45215410 GLENDALE-MILFORD ROAD Cincinnati 45215410 GLENDALE-MILFORD ROAD Cincinnati 45215410 GLENDALE-MILFORD ROAD Cincinnati 45215P.O. Box 560 Lebanon 45036P.O. Box 560 Lebanon 45036P.O. Box 560 Lebanon 45036P.O. Box 560 Lebanon 45036P.O. Box 560 Lebanon 45036P.O. Box 560 Lebanon 45036P.O. Box 560 Lebanon 45036P.O. Box 560 Lebanon 45036999 WEST STATE ROUTE 122 Lebanon 450361200 S. MAIN ST. Franklin 450051200 S. MAIN ST. Franklin 45005160 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE Franklin 45005160 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE Franklin 45005675 Oxford Road Franklin 45005ERPCO Lebanon Terminal Lebanon 450361157 State Road 122 West Lebanon 450361157 State Road 122 West Lebanon 45036

Page 65: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1157 State Road 122 West Lebanon 450364000 TURTLE CTEEK ROAD Mason 450364000 TURTLE CTEEK ROAD Mason 450364000 TURTLE CTEEK ROAD Mason 450364000 TURTLE CTEEK ROAD Mason 450364000 TURTLE CTEEK ROAD Mason 450364000 TURTLE CTEEK ROAD Mason 4503611135 Corundite Street NW Massillon 4464711135 Corundite Street NW Massillon 4464711135 Corundite Street NW Massillon 4464711135 Corundite Street NW Massillon 446472419 Gambrinus Avenue SW Canton 447062419 Gambrinus Avenue SW Canton 447061001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26021001 E Broadway St Alliance 44601 26022633 Eighth Street NE Canton 44704 23112633 Eighth Street NE Canton 44704 23112633 Eighth Street NE Canton 44704 23112633 Eighth Street NE Canton 44704 23112633 Eighth Street NE Canton 44704 23112633 Eighth Street NE Canton 44704 23112633 Eighth Street NE Canton 44704 2311224 East Maple Street Hartville 44632 88051000 East Washington Street Medina 442561000 East Washington Street Medina 442561000 East Washington Street Medina 442561000 East Washington Street Medina 442561000 East Washington Street Medina 44256

Page 66: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1000 East Washington Street Medina 442561000 East Washington Street Medina 442561000 East Washington Street Medina 442561000 East Washington Street Medina 442561000 East Washington Street Medina 442561000 East Washington Street Medina 44256890 W. Smith Road Medina 44256310 North State Rd Medina 44256310 North State Rd Medina 44256310 North State Rd Medina 44256310 North State Rd Medina 44256310 North State Rd Medina 44256310 North State Rd Medina 442561521 S Chillicothe Rd Aurora 442022693 LAKE ROCKWELL ROAD Ravenna Twp. 44266446 W Lake St Ravenna 44266 3649446 W Lake St Ravenna 44266 36492065 Manchester Road Akron 44314 1770240 West Emerling Avenue Akron 44301 1600226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 2232226 Opportunity Parkway Akron 44307 22321566 Firestone Parkway Akron 44301PPG Industries, Inc. Barberton 44203 3913PPG Industries, Inc. Barberton 44203 3913PPG Industries, Inc. Barberton 44203 3913381 GENEVA AVE. TALLMADGE 44203

Page 67: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

COUNTY EUIDDelaware P058Delaware P059Delaware P060Delaware P061Delaware P062Delaware P063Delaware P058Delaware P061Delaware P062Fairfield N001Fairfield N001Fairfield N001Fairfield N001Fairfield N001Fairfield N001Fairfield N001Fairfield N001Fairfield N001Fairfield N001Fayette P009Fayette R003Fayette R004Fayette R005Fayette R006Fayette R007Fayette R008Fayette P002Fayette P003Fayette P004Fayette R003Fayette R004Fayette R005Fayette R006Fayette R007Fayette R008Franklin R019Franklin R019Franklin R020Franklin R021Franklin R025Franklin P901Franklin P901Franklin P901Franklin P032Franklin P032Franklin P032Franklin P029Franklin P029Franklin P029Franklin J001Franklin P365Franklin P366Franklin P367

Page 68: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Franklin P368Franklin P369Franklin P370Franklin P010Franklin P010Franklin P010Franklin P010Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P028Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P036Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P035Franklin P001Franklin P001Franklin P001Franklin P001Franklin P001Franklin P001Franklin P001Franklin P003

Page 69: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Franklin P003Franklin P003Franklin P003Franklin P003Franklin P003Franklin P004Franklin P004Franklin P004Franklin P004Franklin P004Franklin P004Franklin P004Franklin P006Franklin P006Franklin P006Franklin P006Franklin P006Franklin P006Franklin P001Franklin P001Franklin P001Franklin R003Franklin K001Franklin K002Franklin K003Franklin K008Franklin K010Franklin K011Franklin P002Franklin B142Franklin B142Franklin B142Franklin B142Franklin B142Franklin B142Franklin B142Franklin B142Franklin B142Franklin B142Franklin K001Franklin K001Franklin K002Franklin K002Franklin K003Franklin K003Franklin K001Franklin K001Franklin K002Franklin K002Franklin K003Franklin K003Wyandot P901Wyandot P901Wyandot P901

Page 70: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Wyandot P901Wyandot P901Wyandot P901Knox N002Knox P032Knox P032Knox P033Knox P033Knox P037Knox P037Knox P037Knox P037Knox P037Knox P037Licking B001Licking B001Licking B001Licking B001Licking B001Licking J003Licking J003Licking J003Licking P001Licking P001Licking P001Licking P002Licking P002Licking P002Licking P003Licking P003Licking P003Licking P004Licking P004Licking P004Licking P005Licking P005Licking P005Licking P006Licking P006Licking P006Licking P007Licking P007Licking P007Licking P008Licking P008Licking P008Licking P009Licking P009Licking P009Licking P010Licking P010Licking P010Licking P011Licking P011

Page 71: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Licking P011Licking P013Licking P013Licking P013Licking P016Licking P016Licking P016Licking J003Licking J003Licking J003Licking P001Licking P001Licking P001Licking P002Licking P002Licking P002Licking P003Licking P003Licking P003Licking P004Licking P004Licking P004Licking P005Licking P005Licking P005Licking P006Licking P006Licking P006Licking P007Licking P007Licking P007Licking P008Licking P008Licking P008Licking P009Licking P009Licking P009Licking P010Licking P010Licking P010Licking P011Licking P011Licking P011Licking P013Licking P013Licking P013Licking P016Licking P016Licking P016Madison L015Madison P023Madison R025Madison R027Madison R022

Page 72: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Madison R023Madison R003Madison R024Madison R028Madison R029Madison R030Madison R022Madison R023Pickaway B014Pickaway T183Pickaway N002Pickaway P901Pickaway P901Pickaway P901Pickaway P901Pickaway P901Pickaway P901Union K201Union P036Union P036Union P071Union P071Union P043Union P043Ashtabula P030Ashtabula B008Ashtabula P902Ashtabula P017Ashtabula K001Ashtabula K002Ashtabula K004Ashtabula P003Ashtabula P045Carroll P016Carroll P016Carroll P014Carroll P014Carroll P015Carroll P015Carroll P006Carroll P006Carroll P013Carroll P013Carroll B002Carroll B002Carroll P009Carroll P009Carroll P005Carroll P005Carroll P007Carroll P007Carroll P008Carroll P008Carroll P010

Page 73: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Carroll P010Carroll P011Carroll P011Carroll P012Carroll P012Carroll B002Carroll P005Carroll P006Carroll P007Carroll P008Carroll P009Carroll P010Carroll P011Carroll P012Carroll B001Carroll B001Carroll B001Carroll B002Carroll B002Carroll B002Columbiana P901Columbiana P901Geauga K005Geauga K006Geauga K007Geauga K009Geauga K010Geauga K011Geauga K012Geauga K013Geauga K014Geauga K015Geauga K016Geauga K017Geauga K030Geauga P014Geauga P014Geauga P013Geauga P013Geauga P009Geauga P009Geauga P008Geauga P008Lake P011Lake P011Lake K002Lake K002Lake K003Lake K003Lake P001Lake P002Lake P007Lake P008Lake P001

Page 74: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Lake P001Lake P002Lake P002Lake P901Lake B001Lake B002Lake B003Lake B004Lake B005Lorain B010Lorain B012Lorain K014Lorain K015Lorain K017Lorain K014Lorain K015Lorain K017Lorain K014Lorain K015Lorain K017Lorain K014Lorain K015Lorain K017Lorain K014Lorain K015Lorain K017Lorain K014Lorain K015Lorain K017Lorain K007Lorain K007Lorain P071Lorain P071Lorain P081Lorain P081Lorain B007Lorain B008Lorain B002Lorain B002Lorain B002Lorain B001Lorain B001Lorain B001Lorain B014Lorain B014Lorain B014Lorain B014Mahoning F003Mahoning B001Mahoning B001Mahoning B001Mahoning F001Mahoning K002Mahoning K002

Page 75: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Mahoning J001Mahoning K011Mahoning K012Mahoning K013Mahoning K012Trumbull P902Trumbull P902Trumbull P028Trumbull P901Trumbull K003Trumbull K002Trumbull B001Trumbull B002Trumbull P901Trumbull K004Trumbull P001Trumbull P901Trumbull P901Trumbull N001Trumbull N001Trumbull N001Trumbull N001Trumbull N001Trumbull N001Trumbull N001Trumbull N001Trumbull N001Wayne P901Wayne B009Wayne P027Wayne P901Wayne P903Wayne F021Wayne P021Wayne P039Wayne P902Wayne F003Wayne F006Wayne F007Wayne F008Wayne F018Wayne F019Wayne F029Wayne F031Wayne P011Wayne P014Wayne P019Wayne P021Wayne P023Wayne P025Wayne P026Wayne P027Wayne P901Wayne P902

Page 76: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Wayne P903Wayne P904Wayne F008Wayne F018Wayne F019Wayne F031Wayne P004Wayne P004Wayne B003Allen P001Allen P001Allen K004Allen K009Allen K013Allen K016Allen K017Allen K018Allen K030Allen K031Allen K032Allen K033Allen K043Allen K060Allen K062Allen P025Allen P025Allen P010Allen B004Allen B004Allen B004Allen B028Allen B029Allen B005Allen B006Allen B005Allen B005Allen B005Allen B005Allen B006Allen B006Allen B006Allen B006Allen B003Allen N006Allen P801Allen N006Allen N006Allen N006Ashland P901Ashland P901Ashland P901Ashland P901Ashland P901Ashland P901

Page 77: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Auglaize P914Auglaize P928Auglaize P004Auglaize P004Auglaize B001Auglaize B001Auglaize B001Crawford P002Defiance P180Defiance P190Defiance P174Defiance P020Defiance P318Defiance P318Defiance P318Defiance P318Defiance P318Defiance P318Defiance P318Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P271Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P012Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264

Page 78: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Defiance P264Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P011Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P264Defiance P001Defiance P025Defiance P027Defiance P003Defiance P025Defiance P025Defiance P025Defiance P025Defiance P025Defiance P026Defiance P027Defiance P027Defiance P027Defiance P027Defiance P027Defiance P003Defiance P010

Page 79: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Defiance P001Defiance P015Defiance P012Defiance P013Defiance P008Defiance P048Defiance P048Defiance P049Defiance P050Defiance P051Defiance P052Defiance P048Defiance P049Defiance P050Defiance P051Defiance P052Defiance P008Defiance P008Defiance P009Defiance P009Erie P901Fulton P001Fulton P001Fulton P001Fulton P015Fulton P001Fulton P002Fulton P002Fulton P002Fulton P701Fulton P600Fulton P600Fulton P601Fulton P601Fulton P309Fulton P309Fulton P311Fulton P311Fulton P302Fulton P302Fulton P314Fulton P314Fulton P510Fulton P510Fulton P511Fulton P511Hancock K007Hancock K007Hancock K008Hancock K008Henry K005Henry K006Henry K010Henry B001

Page 80: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Henry B002Henry B003Henry B004Henry P005Henry B001Henry B001Henry B002Henry B002Henry K004Henry K005Huron P003Huron K027Marion P002Marion P008Marion P901Marion P903Marion P903Marion P903Marion P903Marion P903Ottawa P027Ottawa P027Ottawa P027Ottawa P027Ottawa P027Richland P901Richland P901Richland N004Richland N004Richland P901Richland P901Richland B008Richland B008Richland B008Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P006Sandusky P001Sandusky P001Sandusky P001Sandusky P001Seneca R013Van Wert B001

Page 81: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Van Wert B001Van Wert B001Wood P901Wood P901Wood P901Wood P001Wood P004Wood P001Wyandot R009Wyandot P023Wyandot P023Wyandot P023Wyandot P023Wyandot P023Wyandot P901Wyandot P901Wyandot P901Wyandot P901Wyandot P901Wyandot P902Wyandot P902Wyandot P902Wyandot P902Wyandot P902Wyandot K004Wyandot K005Wyandot K006Wyandot K007Wyandot K008Wyandot K004Wyandot K005Wyandot K006Wyandot K007Wyandot K008Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P013Lucas P013Lucas P013Lucas P013Lucas P013Lucas P013Lucas P013Lucas P013Lucas P013Lucas P023Lucas P023

Page 82: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Lucas P062Lucas P062Lucas P063Lucas P063Lucas P064Lucas P064Lucas P065Lucas P065Lucas P066Lucas P066Lucas P067Lucas P067Lucas P068Lucas P068Lucas P069Lucas P069Lucas P070Lucas P070Lucas P071Lucas P071Lucas P022Lucas P022Lucas P022Lucas P022Lucas P022Lucas P022Lucas P022Lucas P018Lucas P018Lucas P018Lucas B048Lucas B050Lucas B051Lucas P012Lucas B055Lucas B055Lucas B055Lucas B053Lucas B054Lucas P038Lucas P038Lucas P003Lucas P003Lucas P003Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P002Lucas P002Lucas P002Lucas P003Lucas P003Lucas P901Lucas B006

Page 83: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Lucas B006Lucas B006Lucas B006Lucas B001Lucas B005Lucas B008Lucas B009Lucas B010Lucas B024Lucas B006Lucas B003Lucas B004Lucas B013Lucas B014Lucas B015Lucas B016Lucas B017Lucas B018Lucas B019Lucas B020Lucas B022Lucas B029Lucas B030Lucas B031Lucas B033Lucas P007Lucas B034Lucas B035Lucas P037Lucas B032Lucas P003Lucas P004Lucas P049Lucas P050Lucas P051Lucas B035Lucas B034Lucas P037Lucas P020Lucas P020Lucas P020Lucas P020Lucas P020Lucas P007Lucas B035Lucas P009Lucas P007Lucas P007Lucas P007Lucas P007Lucas P007Lucas P001Lucas P002Lucas P001

Page 84: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P001Lucas P002Lucas P002Lucas P002Lucas P002Lucas P901Lucas F003Wood P003Wood P003Wood P001Wood P001Wood P003Wood P003Wood P003Wood P003Wood P003Wood P003Wood P003Wood P003Highland R001Highland R002Highland R005Highland R006Highland R007Highland P005Highland P005Highland P007Highland P007Highland P005Highland P005Highland P007Highland P007Highland P902Highland P902Highland P902Highland P902Highland P902Highland P902Logan P036Logan K015Logan K015Logan P905Logan P905Logan P005Logan P005Logan P011Logan P011Logan P013Logan P013Logan P014Logan P014Logan P020

Page 85: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Logan P020Logan P905Logan P905Logan P020Logan P020Logan P014Logan P014Logan P025Logan P030Logan P032Shelby P006Shelby P006Shelby P006Shelby P017Shelby P017Shelby P017Shelby P001Shelby P002Athens B012Athens B012Athens B013Athens B013Belmont P901Belmont P901Belmont P901Belmont P901Belmont P901Belmont P901Belmont B009Belmont B010Belmont B010Belmont B012Belmont B011Coshocton F001Coshocton B004Coshocton B007Coshocton B003Coshocton B008Coshocton B006Coshocton F004Coshocton F007Coshocton P007Gallia B001Gallia B005Gallia B003Gallia B002Gallia B004Gallia P001Guernsey B012Guernsey B012Guernsey B014Guernsey B014Guernsey B013Guernsey B013

Page 86: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Guernsey P007Guernsey R016Guernsey R018Guernsey R019Guernsey R021Guernsey P014Harrison P003Harrison P901Hocking P901Hocking P901Hocking P901Hocking P901Hocking P901Hocking P901Jackson F006Jackson P903Jackson P903Jackson P903Jackson K002Jackson K003Jackson R007Jackson P002Jackson P002Jackson P002Jackson P002Jackson P004Jackson P004Jackson P004Jackson P004Jackson P009Jackson P009Jackson P009Jackson P009Jackson P014Jackson P014Jackson P014Jackson P014Jackson P015Jackson P015Jackson P015Jackson P015Jackson P018Jackson P018Jackson P018Jackson P018Jefferson B010Jefferson B010Jefferson B010Jefferson B010Jefferson B010Jefferson B010Jefferson B009Jefferson B002Jefferson B001

Page 87: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson P903Jefferson B011Jefferson B012Jefferson B013Jefferson B007Jefferson B008Jefferson B009Jefferson B010Jefferson P903Jefferson P003Jefferson P067Jefferson P057Jefferson P901Jefferson P054Jefferson P058Jefferson P902Jefferson P059Jefferson P060Monroe P963Monroe P964Monroe P965Monroe P966Monroe P967Monroe P968Monroe P969Monroe P970Monroe P955Monroe P956Monroe P957Monroe P958Monroe P959Monroe P960Monroe P961Monroe P962Monroe P975Monroe P976Monroe P977Monroe P978Franklin P901Franklin P901Franklin P901Franklin P901Franklin P901

Page 88: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Franklin P901Muskingum P008Muskingum P008Muskingum P017Muskingum P017Muskingum P017Muskingum P017Muskingum P017Muskingum P017Belmont P901Muskingum P901Harrison F003Harrison F003Harrison F004Muskingum P901Harrison F003Noble K002Noble K003Noble K004Noble K010Perry P901Perry P901Perry P001Perry P001Perry P910Cuyahoga P901Cuyahoga P901Cuyahoga P901Cuyahoga P901Cuyahoga P901Cuyahoga P901Pike B003Pike F029Pike F030Pike F018Pike K001Pike R001Pike R002Pike R003Pike R004Pike R011Pike F002Pike F028Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013

Page 89: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Ross B013Ross B013Ross B013Tuscarawas P602Tuscarawas P602Tuscarawas P102Tuscarawas P102Tuscarawas P411Tuscarawas P411Tuscarawas P411Tuscarawas P411Tuscarawas P411Tuscarawas F468Stark F002Vinton B001Vinton B001Washington B002Washington F031Washington P010Washington P001Washington P001Washington P001Washington P001Washington P002Washington P002Washington P002Washington P002Washington P005Washington P005Washington P005Washington P005Washington P005Washington P005Washington P006Washington P006Washington P006Washington P006Washington P006Washington P006Washington P011Washington P011Washington P011Washington P011Washington P011Washington P011Washington P012Washington P012Washington P012Washington P012Washington P012Washington P012Washington J001Washington J001Washington P909

Page 90: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Washington P909Washington P901Washington P901Washington P901Washington P908Washington P908Washington P901Washington P901Washington B011Washington B011Washington B011Adams B001Lawrence P001Lawrence P002Lawrence P003Lawrence P004Scioto B004Scioto B004Scioto F004Scioto P014Scioto P015Scioto P016Scioto P018Scioto P021Scioto P019Scioto P020Scioto P906Scioto F001Scioto F002Scioto F003Scioto F007Scioto P002Scioto P005Scioto P013Scioto P005Scioto P009Scioto P012Scioto P014Scioto P906Scioto P910Scioto P913Scioto P915Scioto P916Scioto P917Scioto P903Scioto P908Scioto P918Darke K006Darke B001Darke B001Darke B001Darke B001Darke B001Darke B001

Page 91: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Darke B001Darke B001Darke B001Darke B001Darke B001Darke B001Greene K003Greene P931Greene P932Greene P933Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene P003Greene B311Greene B311Greene B310Greene B310Greene B310Greene B310Greene B309Greene B309Greene P002Greene P002Greene P002Greene P002Greene P002Greene P002Miami K005Miami K005Montgomery J001Montgomery K007Montgomery K008Montgomery K009Montgomery K010Montgomery K011Montgomery K012Montgomery K013Montgomery K014Montgomery K017Montgomery K020Montgomery P002

Page 92: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Montgomery B004Montgomery B004Montgomery B004Montgomery B004Montgomery B004Montgomery B004Montgomery P901Montgomery P901Montgomery P901Montgomery B003Montgomery B003Montgomery B003Montgomery B004Montgomery B004Montgomery B004Montgomery B004Montgomery B005Montgomery B002Montgomery B002Montgomery B002Montgomery B006Montgomery B006Montgomery B006Montgomery B003Montgomery B004Montgomery B004Montgomery B003Montgomery B003Montgomery B005Montgomery B005Montgomery B001Montgomery B001Montgomery B001Preble P051Preble P052Preble P053Preble P505Preble P506Preble P507Preble P508Preble P509Preble P510Preble P511Preble P512Preble P513Preble P514Preble P520Preble P524Preble P529Preble P535Preble P537Preble P538Preble P539Preble T010

Page 93: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Cuyahoga P910Cuyahoga P910Cuyahoga B006Cuyahoga B101Cuyahoga B102Cuyahoga B104Cuyahoga P071Cuyahoga P071Cuyahoga P024Cuyahoga P001Cuyahoga P001Cuyahoga P002Cuyahoga P001Cuyahoga P003Cuyahoga P291Cuyahoga P918Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga F004Cuyahoga P043Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga P900Cuyahoga N007Cuyahoga P012Cuyahoga P012Cuyahoga P012Cuyahoga P901Cuyahoga P012Cuyahoga P012Cuyahoga P012Cuyahoga P903Cuyahoga P024Cuyahoga P024Cuyahoga P024Cuyahoga P024Cuyahoga P024Cuyahoga P024Cuyahoga P007Cuyahoga P007Cuyahoga P003Cuyahoga P005Cuyahoga P006Cuyahoga P007Cuyahoga P008Cuyahoga P003Cuyahoga P003Cuyahoga P003

Page 94: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Cuyahoga P003Cuyahoga P003Cuyahoga P003Cuyahoga P004Cuyahoga P004Cuyahoga P004Cuyahoga P004Cuyahoga P004Cuyahoga P004Cuyahoga K005Cuyahoga K005Cuyahoga K005Cuyahoga F001Butler P902Butler P902Butler P902Butler P902Butler P902Butler P902Butler B001Butler B001Butler B001Butler B001Butler B001Butler B002Butler B002Butler B002Butler B002Butler B002Butler B002Butler B002Butler B002Butler R001Butler P001Butler P002Butler P003Butler P004Butler P005Butler P006Butler P007Butler P008Butler P926Butler P926Butler P926Butler P926Butler P926Butler P926Butler P925Butler P926Butler P925Butler P023Butler P926Butler B001Butler B001

Page 95: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Butler B001Butler B002Butler B002Butler B002Butler B003Butler B003Butler B003Butler B010Butler B020Butler B020Butler B020Butler B008Butler B009Butler K004Butler K004Butler B011Butler B012Butler B014Butler B010Butler P001Butler P002Butler B003Butler B003Butler B003Butler B003Butler F001Clermont B007Clermont B007Clermont B008Clermont B008Clermont B006Clermont B006Clermont B005Clermont B006Clermont B005Clermont B006Clermont B005Clermont B005Clermont B006Clermont B002Clermont B001Clermont B004Clermont B004Clermont B001Clermont B002Clermont B002Clermont B003Clermont B003Clermont B001Clermont B003Hamilton P029Hamilton P030Hamilton P031Hamilton P029

Page 96: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Hamilton P030Hamilton P031Hamilton P029Hamilton P030Hamilton P031Hamilton B007Hamilton B007Hamilton P035Hamilton P036Hamilton P036Hamilton P029Hamilton P030Hamilton P031Hamilton B007Hamilton B007Hamilton B002Hamilton B006Hamilton P017Hamilton P010Hamilton B027Hamilton P010Hamilton P017Hamilton B027Hamilton B027Hamilton B027Hamilton B027Hamilton B027Hamilton P010Hamilton P017Hamilton B009Hamilton B009Hamilton B009Hamilton B003Hamilton B003Hamilton P008Hamilton P004Hamilton P003Hamilton P003Hamilton P004Hamilton B019Hamilton B020Hamilton P007Hamilton P008Hamilton N001Hamilton N001Hamilton N001Hamilton N001Hamilton N001Hamilton N001Hamilton J001Hamilton B027Hamilton B027Hamilton B027Hamilton B027

Page 97: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Hamilton P902Hamilton P902Hamilton P902Hamilton P902Hamilton K006Hamilton K006Hamilton K044Hamilton K007Hamilton K007Hamilton K044Hamilton K001Hamilton K001Hamilton K003Hamilton K003Hamilton K005Hamilton K005Hamilton P002Hamilton B005Hamilton B015Hamilton B015Hamilton B016Hamilton B016Hamilton B016Hamilton K005Hamilton K006Hamilton K004Hamilton K005Hamilton K006Hamilton R022Hamilton B022Hamilton B043Hamilton B045Hamilton B045Hamilton P001Hamilton P003Hamilton P004Hamilton P005Warren B007Warren B007Warren B007Warren B007Warren B008Warren B008Warren B008Warren B008Warren J002Warren P002Warren P002Warren P003Warren P003Warren P001Warren J001Warren P001Warren P001

Page 98: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Warren P001Warren P902Warren P902Warren P902Warren P902Warren P902Warren P902Stark P009Stark P017Stark P022Stark P023Stark J001Stark J001Stark P026Stark P011Stark P016Stark P017Stark P018Stark P020Stark P023Stark P029Stark P030Stark P031Stark P032Stark P033Stark P040Stark P040Stark P047Stark P005Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P001Stark P123Stark P123Stark P123Stark P123Stark P123Stark P123Stark P123Stark B003Medina N002Medina N002Medina N002Medina N002Medina N002

Page 99: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Medina N002Medina N002Medina N002Medina N002Medina N002Medina N002Medina P912Medina P901Medina P901Medina P901Medina P901Medina P901Medina P901Portage J002Portage P902Portage P001Portage P001Summit P902Summit P016Summit B001Summit B001Summit B001Summit B001Summit B001Summit B001Summit B001Summit B001Summit B004Summit B004Summit B004Summit B004Summit B004Summit B004Summit B004Summit B004Summit P001Summit P098Summit P098Summit P114Summit K001

Page 100: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

EUID DESCRIPTIONSand Reclamation System (LRRC 1) controlled by baghouse LRDC 1Sand Reclamation System (LRRC 2) controlled by baghouse LRDC 2Vibramill Shakeout No.1 (LRVM 1) controlled by baghouse LRDC 2Vibramill Shakeout No.2 (LRVM 2) controlled by baghouse LRDC 1Vibramill Shakeout No.3 (LRVM 3) controlled by baghouse LRDC 1Vibramill Shakeout No.4 (LRVM 4) controlled by baghouse LRDC 2Sand Reclamation System (LRRC 1) controlled by baghouse LRDC 1Vibramill Shakeout No.2 (LRVM 2) controlled by baghouse LRDC 1Vibramill Shakeout No.3 (LRVM 3) controlled by baghouse LRDC 1

Trough drying cabinetLamination table #1Lamination table #2Lamination table #3Lamination table #4Lamination table #5Lamination table #6Panel cutting sawPanel cutting sawPanel cutting saw (Rogers saw)Lamination table #1Lamination table #2Lamination table #3Lamination table #4Lamination table #5Lamination table #6Adhesive Spray Booths (AV-1) with flashoff oven and controlled with a permanent total enclosure (PTE) vented to cAdhesive Spray Booths (AV-1) with flashoff oven and controlled with a permanent total enclosure (PTE) vented to cAdhesive Spray Booth (AF-1) with flashoff oven and controlled with a permanent total enclosure (PTE) vented to caAdhesive Spray Booth (AF-2) with flashoff oven and controlled with a permanent total enclosure (PTE) vented to caAdhesive Spray Booth (AF-3) with flashoff oven and controlled with a permanent total enclosure (PTE) vented to ca

Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW)525 Gallon Weigh Tank800 Gallon Weigh Tank2,000 Gallon Letdown Tank

Page 101: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

2,400 Gallon Letdown Tank3,600 Gallon Letdown Tank3,600 Gallon Letdown TankFormaldehyde PlantFormaldehyde PlantFormaldehyde PlantFormaldehyde Plant(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbonCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon Regeneration Kiln 20A controlled by a thermal incinerator, wet scrubber and venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubberCarbon regeneration kiln 20B controlled by a thermal incinerator, a wet scrubber and a venturi scrubber(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbon(79 Reactivation Kiln) Regenerate carbonPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionPlant No. 2 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde production vented to a catalytic incinerato

Page 102: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Plant No. 2 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde production vented to a catalytic incineratoPlant No. 2 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde production vented to a catalytic incineratoPlant No. 2 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde production vented to a catalytic incineratoPlant No. 2 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde production vented to a catalytic incineratoPlant No. 2 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde production vented to a catalytic incineratoResin Kettle K1, 13,000 gallonResin Kettle K1, 13,000 gallonResin Kettle K1, 13,000 gallonResin Kettle K1, 13,000 gallonResin Kettle K1, 13,000 gallonResin Kettle K1, 13,000 gallonResin Kettle K1, 13,000 gallonResin Kettle K3, 2,000 gallonResin Kettle K3, 2,000 gallonResin Kettle K3, 2,000 gallonResin Kettle K3, 2,000 gallonResin Kettle K3, 2,000 gallonResin Kettle K3, 2,000 gallonPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionPlant No. 1 metal oxide process for formaldehyde and urea-formaldehyde productionSurface coating operation #6, flowcoat Line 2 with permanent total enclosure and regenerative thermal oxidizerHarris N954 8-unit Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Press (954-1) with natural gas-fired dryer vented to twHarris N900 8-unit Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Press (908) with natural gas-fired dryer vented to two Harris N900 4-unit Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Press (904) with natural gas-fired dryer vented to two Goss C700 4-unit Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Press (701) with natural gas-fired dryer vented to two RGoss C700 4-unit Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Press (702) with natural gas-fired dryer vented to two RGoss C700 4-unit Heatset Web Offset Lithographic Printing Press (703) with natural gas-fired dryer vented to two R500 ton per hour drum mix asphalt plantNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerNew Boiler 6 - 206 mmBtu/hr gas/oil fired water tube boiler with low NOx burnerInterior Lining operation controlled by a PTE and regenrative Thermal oxidizerInterior Lining operation controlled by a PTE and regenrative Thermal oxidizerExterior coating operation controlled by a PTE and a Regenerative Thermal oxidizerExterior coating operation controlled by a PTE and a Regenerative Thermal oxidizerLid coating and lining operationLid coating and lining operationInterior Lining operation controlled by a PTE and regenrative Thermal oxidizerInterior Lining operation controlled by a PTE and regenrative Thermal oxidizerExterior coating operation controlled by a PTE and a Regenerative Thermal oxidizerExterior coating operation controlled by a PTE and a Regenerative Thermal oxidizerLid coating and lining operationLid coating and lining operation350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)

Page 103: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)

Glass Making System No. 1 controlled by a baghouse (Terms in this permit supercede those identified in PTI 01-01Glass Making System No. 1 controlled by a baghouse (Terms in this permit supercede those identified in PTI 01-01Glass Making System No. 2 controlled by a baghouse (Terms in this permit supercede those identified in PTI 01-01Glass Making System No. 2 controlled by a baghouse (Terms in this permit supercede those identified in PTI 01-01fabrication and packaging that include the following operations: fiberizers, rotary formers, mills, baggers and screenfabrication and packaging that include the following operations: fiberizers, rotary formers, mills, baggers and screenfabrication and packaging that include the following operations: fiberizers, rotary formers, mills, baggers and screenfabrication and packaging that include the following operations: fiberizers, rotary formers, mills, baggers and screenfabrication and packaging that include the following operations: fiberizers, rotary formers, mills, baggers and screenfabrication and packaging that include the following operations: fiberizers, rotary formers, mills, baggers and screen59 MMBH Coal Fired Boiler59 MMBH Coal Fired Boiler59 MMBH Coal Fired Boiler59 MMBH Coal Fired BoilerLarge Diameter Lathe No. 1 - 3.78 MMBtu/hr controlled with a SCR unit and monitored by a NOx CEMSLoading Rack for bulk truck loadingLoading Rack for bulk truck loadingLoading Rack for bulk truck loadingLUWA #1 Thin-film evaporatorLUWA #1 Thin-film evaporatorLUWA #1 Thin-film evaporator

Fractional Distillation ColumnFractional Distillation ColumnFractional Distillation ColumnSafety-Therm #1 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #1 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #1 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #2 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #2 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #2 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #3 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #3 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #3 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #4 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #4 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #4 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)LUWA #2 Thin-film evaporatorLUWA #2 Thin-film evaporatorLUWA #2 Thin-film evaporatorFilter shredder for drycleaning filtersFilter shredder for drycleaning filtersFilter shredder for drycleaning filtersSolvent dewatering beds to remove moisture from chlorinated solventsSolvent dewatering beds to remove moisture from chlorinated solvents

Page 104: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Solvent dewatering beds to remove moisture from chlorinated solventsDrum receiving vatDrum receiving vatDrum receiving vatdrum washing operationdrum washing operationdrum washing operationLoading Rack for bulk truck loadingLoading Rack for bulk truck loadingLoading Rack for bulk truck loadingLUWA #1 Thin-film evaporatorLUWA #1 Thin-film evaporatorLUWA #1 Thin-film evaporator

Fractional Distillation ColumnFractional Distillation ColumnFractional Distillation ColumnSafety-Therm #1 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #1 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #1 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #2 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #2 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #2 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #3 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #3 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #3 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #4 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #4 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)Safety-Therm #4 (Solids/sludge distillation unit)LUWA #2 Thin-film evaporatorLUWA #2 Thin-film evaporatorLUWA #2 Thin-film evaporatorFilter shredder for drycleaning filtersFilter shredder for drycleaning filtersFilter shredder for drycleaning filtersSolvent dewatering beds to remove moisture from chlorinated solventsSolvent dewatering beds to remove moisture from chlorinated solventsSolvent dewatering beds to remove moisture from chlorinated solventsDrum receiving vatDrum receiving vatDrum receiving vatdrum washing operationdrum washing operationdrum washing operationAutomatic tube cleaner, 24 mm ED line, with catalytic incineratorRoller leveler, 24 mm line, with catalytic incinerator, modification to PTI 01 4502UV Line 3 spray booth with infrared oven, UV oven and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-3.Decorative Coating Line spray booth with infrared oven, UV oven and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-UV Line 1 spray booth with infrared oven, UV oven and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-1.

Page 105: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

UV Line 2 spray booth with infrared oven, UV oven and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-1.Topcoat Line spray booth with dry filtration vented to thermal incinerator 20-2.Hardcoat Line spray booth with infrared oven, UV oven and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-2.UV Line 4 spray booth with infrared oven, UV oven and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-2.Anti Fog Line 1 spray booth with ovens and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-2.Anti Fog Line 2 spray booth with ovens and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-2.UV Line 1 spray booth with infrared oven, UV oven and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-1.UV Line 2 spray booth with infrared oven, UV oven and dry filtration venting to thermal incinerator 20-1.

300 TPH counter-flow drum mix asphalt plant controlled by a knockout box and baghouse300 TPH counter-flow drum mix asphalt plant controlled by a knockout box and baghouse300 TPH counter-flow drum mix asphalt plant controlled by a knockout box and baghouse300 TPH counter-flow drum mix asphalt plant controlled by a knockout box and baghouse300 TPH counter-flow drum mix asphalt plant controlled by a knockout box and baghouse300 TPH counter-flow drum mix asphalt plant controlled by a knockout box and baghouse

System 2 granulation drum and process cooler vented to three baghousesSystem 2 granulation drum and process cooler vented to three baghousesSystem 2 raw material and product handling, milling, and screening with baghouseSystem 2 raw material and product handling, milling, and screening with baghouseSystems 1,2 and 3 Packaging Operations vented to baghousesSystems 1,2 and 3 Packaging Operations vented to baghousesSheet mold compound (SMC) machine 1

Batch Asphalt PlantGen Set SITA (CoGen), 4 stroke rich burn (4SRB), reciprocating internal combustion engine (RICE) for driving and eleTreater # 2Treater # 1Treater # 4Phenolic Resin MixingMixer 8: liquid molding compound (wet mix), vented to baghouse2000 HP (22 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/lean burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engin2000 HP (22 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/lean burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engin2000 HP (22 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/lean burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engin2000 HP (22 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/lean burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engin2000 HP (22 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/lean burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engin2000 HP (22 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/lean burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engin1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi2000 HP (22 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/lean burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engin2000 HP (22 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/lean burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engin1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi

Page 106: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi1320 HP (14.52 mmBtu/hr) natural gas-fired, spark ignition, 4-cycle/rich burn, reciprocating pipeline compressor engi

Cupola #1, equipped with afterburner and scrubberCupola #1, equipped with afterburner and scrubberSpray paint recirculation booth 4 of overhead conveyor line 1, controlled by thermal oxidizer 1.Spray paint recirculation booth 5 of overhead conveyor line 1, controlled by thermal oxidizer 1.Spatter booth of overhead conveyor line 1, controlled by thermal oxidizer 1.Off-line spatter spray booth controlled by thermal oxidizer 1; (for wood cabinets) K009Flat line booth 1 and oven, controlled by thermal oxidizer 1.Off-line spray paint booth 1, equipped with Thermal Oxidizer 1.Off-line spray paint booth 2, equipped with Thermal Oxidizer 1.Off-line spray paint booth 3 and electric oven, equipped with Thermal Oxidizer 1.Off-line spray paint booth 4, equipped with Thermal Oxidizer 1.Off-line spray paint booth 5, equipped with Thermal Oxidizer 1.Flat-line 2 and oven, equipped with Thermal Oxidizer 1.Cefla 1--Two spray paint booths with dedicated natural gas ovens, controlled with a water curtain and Thermal OxidiSpray paint booth 6 of overhead conveyor line #1, equipped with Thermal Oxidizer 1.Woodworking equipment exhausted to a 53,000 cfm Baghouse, MASCO ID P1-24807.Woodworking equipment exhausted to a 53,000 cfm Baghouse, MASCO ID P1-24807.Woodworking equipment with a 40,000 cfm baghouse, P2-10914.Woodworking equipment with a 40,000 cfm baghouse, P2-10914.Woodworking equipment with an 11,200 cfm baghouse, P2-10906.Woodworking equipment with an 11,200 cfm baghouse, P2-10906.Woodworking equipment with a 39,400 cfm baghouse, P2-21588.Woodworking equipment with a 39,400 cfm baghouse, P2-21588.

F-2 Coater - Vinyl and Adhesive Coating Line with Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO), permanent total enclosurF-2 Coater - Vinyl and Adhesive Coating Line with Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO), permanent total enclosurF-3 Coater with flexographic print station and associated 1 MMBtu/hr gas-fired dryer, solvent and emulsion based coF-3 Coater with flexographic print station and associated 1 MMBtu/hr gas-fired dryer, solvent and emulsion based coBanbury Mixer #1 with North BaghouseBanbury Mixer #2 with South BaghouseExtruder/water bath #2 with south baghouseSpin dryer #2Lime kiln with baghouse (shares stack with P002)

Page 107: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Lime kiln with baghouse (shares stack with P002)Lime kiln with ESP (shares stack with P001)Lime kiln with ESP (shares stack with P001)Asphalt Batch Plant

Coal-fired boiler for electric generation - 1131 mmBtu/hrCoal-fired boiler for electric generation - 6040 mmBtu/hrPrime booth and oven (CV) includes spray prime, hood anti-chip and blackout coatingsEnamel booth No. 1 and ovenEnamel booth No. 3 and ovenPrime booth and oven (CV) includes spray prime, hood anti-chip and blackout coatingsEnamel booth No. 1 and ovenEnamel booth No. 3 and ovenPrime booth and oven (CV) includes spray prime, hood anti-chip and blackout coatingsEnamel booth No. 1 and ovenEnamel booth No. 3 and ovenPrime booth and oven (CV) includes spray prime, hood anti-chip and blackout coatingsEnamel booth No. 1 and ovenEnamel booth No. 3 and ovenPrime booth and oven (CV) includes spray prime, hood anti-chip and blackout coatingsEnamel booth No. 1 and ovenEnamel booth No. 3 and ovenPrime booth and oven (CV) includes spray prime, hood anti-chip and blackout coatingsEnamel booth No. 1 and ovenEnamel booth No. 3 and ovenE-coat tank and ovenE-coat tank and ovenNatural gas fired reheat furnace with maximum heat input capacity of 206 MMBtu/hrNatural gas fired reheat furnace with maximum heat input capacity of 206 MMBtu/hrNatural gas fired Bloom reheat furnace with maximum heat input capacity of 421.6 MMBtu/hrNatural gas fired Bloom reheat furnace with maximum heat input capacity of 421.6 MMBtu/hrNo. 7 blast furnace boiler (225 MMBtu/hr natural gas, blast furnace gas, and fuel oil fired boiler)No. 8 blast furnace boiler (225 MMBtu/hr natural gas, blast furnace gas, and fuel oil fired boiler)53.3 mmBtu/hr spreader stoker coal-fired boiler no. 2 with a startup 40 mmBtu/hr natural gas burner and an electrostat53.3 mmBtu/hr spreader stoker coal-fired boiler no. 2 with a startup 40 mmBtu/hr natural gas burner and an electrostat53.3 mmBtu/hr spreader stoker coal-fired boiler no. 2 with a startup 40 mmBtu/hr natural gas burner and an electrostat53.3 mmBtu/hr spreader stoker coal-fired boiler no. 1 with an electrostatic precipitator to control particulate emission53.3 mmBtu/hr spreader stoker coal-fired boiler no. 1 with an electrostatic precipitator to control particulate emission53.3 mmBtu/hr spreader stoker coal-fired boiler no. 1 with an electrostatic precipitator to control particulate emission70 MMBTU/Hr Boiler (Boiler CP 1 in Plant CP) permitted to burn a mixture of wood and tire derived fuel (TDF). TDF n70 MMBTU/Hr Boiler (Boiler CP 1 in Plant CP) permitted to burn a mixture of wood and tire derived fuel (TDF). TDF n70 MMBTU/Hr Boiler (Boiler CP 1 in Plant CP) permitted to burn a mixture of wood and tire derived fuel (TDF). TDF n70 MMBTU/Hr Boiler (Boiler CP 1 in Plant CP) permitted to burn a mixture of wood and tire derived fuel (TDF). TDF nLimestone processing plant16.4 mmBTU/hr wood fired boiler16.4 mmBTU/hr wood fired boiler16.4 mmBTU/hr wood fired boilerAggregate Processing PlantAluminum extrusion coating operations - Electrostatic primer booth, electrostatic topcoat paint booths 1 & 2, bake oven,Aluminum extrusion coating operations - Electrostatic primer booth, electrostatic topcoat paint booths 1 & 2, bake oven,

Page 108: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Loading Rack and VRULine 10: One piece aluminum can extrusion and coating vented to catalytic oxidizerLine 11: One piece aluminum can extrusion and coating vented to catalytic oxidizerLine 12: One piece aluminum can extrusion and coating vented to catalytic oxidizerLine 11: One piece aluminum can extrusion and coating vented to catalytic oxidizer

Boiler No. 1, admin modif to revise VOC emission limits due to changes in AP-42 emission factors.B&W CYCLONE COAL-FIRED BOILER ( BOILER#2)Mill scale drying operationSheet roll coater with oven and catalytic incineratorSlag Dryer Rotary Dryer(replacement) with wet scribber300 TPH drum-mix asphalt plant, equipped with a fabric filter baghouse300 TPH drum-mix asphalt plant, equipped with a fabric filter baghouseMedical waste incinerationMedical waste incinerationMedical waste incinerationMedical waste incinerationMedical waste incinerationMedical waste incinerationMedical waste incinerationMedical waste incinerationMedical waste incinerationStandard and Steel 120 TPH aphalt batch plant w/ settling chamber and baghouse2,370 hp SI ICE pipeline compressor w/catalyst: CAT G3608-LE-TA

sandwich inoculation process controlled by a baghouse (This PTI is for the modification of the Tundish process to t

Fischer Pushup/PunchoutBack Fl Mold SandShakeout from BMM pouring & cooling vented to baghouse 2Pouring & cooling vented to baghouse 2BMM mold making & sand preparation w/ wet scrubberHunter operations: sand preparation w/ baghouse & wet scrubberElectric Induction Furnace 1 vented to baghouse 2Electric Induction Furnace 3 vented to baghouse 2Ductile iron inoculation vented to baghouse 2Electric Induction Furnace 2 vented to baghouse 2Grinders & cut-off saws for cleaning iron castings vented to baghouse 1Tumblast 1 vented to baghouse 2Tumblast 2 vented to baghouse 2BICORE coremaking machine w/wet scrubberLAEMPE I (L-5) coremaking machine w/ scrubberLAEMPE II (L-20) coremaking machine w/ scrubberHunter HMP-20 pouring & cooling vented to baghouse 2Didion shakeout for HMP 10 & HMP 20 vented to baghouse 2LAEMPE III (L-20) cold box core making w/wet scrubberLAEMPE II (L-5) cold box core making w/scrubber

Page 109: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Super 22 shotblast machine vented to baghouse 2Super 28 shotblast machine vented to baghouse 2Hunter operations: sand preparation w/ baghouse & wet scrubberElectric Induction Furnace 1 vented to baghouse 2Electric Induction Furnace 3 vented to baghouse 2Electric Induction Furnace 2 vented to baghouse 2Two wire zinc galvanizing lineTwo wire zinc galvanizing line

Auto adhesive spray 1 (B30) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationAuto adhesive spray 2 (B95) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationManual adhesive spray 3 (B75) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationManual adhesive spray 4 (B165) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationAuto adhesive spray 3 (B123) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationAuto adhesive spray 4 (B124) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationAuto adhesive spray 7 (B360) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationAuto adhesive spray 8 (B361) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationAuto adhesive spray 9 (B362) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationManual adhesive spray 5 (B365-1,2) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationManual adhesive spray machine (B540-1,2) miscellaneous metal parts coating operationautomatic adhesive spray machine - miscellanoues metal parts operationAutomatic Adhesive Spray Machinebenzene NESHAPS sewer system including oil/water separatorbenzene NESHAPS sewer system including oil/water separatorfluid catalytic cracker (FCC)/carbon monoxide (CO) boiler with ESPmodification of existing crude II heater to include burner modification and tube replacement, refinery fuel gas or naturmodification of existing crude II heater to include burner modification and tube replacement, refinery fuel gas or naturmodification of existing crude II heater to include burner modification and tube replacement, refinery fuel gas or naturheater for catalytic galoline hydrotreaterreactor feed furnace for diesel hydrotreater unit, 22.6 mmBtu/hr with low NOx burners93.80 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #562.50 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #693.80 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #593.80 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #593.80 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #593.80 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #562.50 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #662.50 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #662.50 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #662.50 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #667.40 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler #4

165 TPH drum mix asphalt plant with baghouse.165 TPH drum mix asphalt plant with baghouse.165 TPH drum mix asphalt plant with baghouse.165 TPH drum mix asphalt plant with baghouse.165 TPH drum mix asphalt plant with baghouse.165 TPH drum mix asphalt plant with baghouse.

Page 110: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3 TPH electric induction furnace and inoculation process with cyclone and baghouse control: modification to add ductielectric induction furnace and inoculation process with cyclone and baghouse control: modification to add ductile iro

ML1 (Plant 1) - Mold Sand Mix SystemAjax #5 (Plant 1) - Electric Induction Furnace including pouring to transfer ladlesML1 (Plant 1) - Mold Shakeout and Casting CoolingML6 (Plant 2W) - Blast CabinetNo. 3 Plasma arc/convential cupola - Plant 1No. 3 Plasma arc/convential cupola - Plant 1No. 3 Plasma arc/convential cupola - Plant 1No. 3 Plasma arc/convential cupola - Plant 1No. 3 Plasma arc/convential cupola - Plant 1No. 3 Plasma arc/convential cupola - Plant 1No. 3 Plasma arc/convential cupola - Plant 1ML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML1 IRON POURML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML6 (Plant 2W) - RMIP & Rod FurnaceML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pour

Page 111: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

ML3 iron pour

ML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pourML3 iron pour

Fiberglass wool curing oven; line 21Fiberglass sear roll operation; line 21

Fiberglass wool curing oven; line 21Fiberglass wool curing oven; line 21Fiberglass wool curing oven; line 21Fiberglass wool curing oven; line 21Fiberglass wool curing oven; line 21Fiberglass slitting, cutting, and grinding operation with cyclone and baghouse; line 21Fiberglass sear roll operation; line 21Fiberglass sear roll operation; line 21Fiberglass sear roll operation; line 21Fiberglass sear roll operation; line 21Fiberglass sear roll operation; line 21

Page 112: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Unit 81 - Forming and Collectionline 86 forming and collectionline 82 forming and collectionline 84 forming and collectionFiberglass forming and collection unitLine 89 Collection Module A w/venturi scrubberLine 89 Collection Module A w/venturi scrubberLine 89 Collection Module B w/venturi scrubberLine 89 Collection Module C w/venturi scrubberLine 89 Curing Oven w/thermal oxidizerLine 89 Cooling Table w/venturi scrubberLine 89 Collection Module A w/venturi scrubberLine 89 Collection Module B w/venturi scrubberLine 89 Collection Module C w/venturi scrubberLine 89 Curing Oven w/thermal oxidizerLine 89 Cooling Table w/venturi scrubber

350 TPH Drum Mix Asphalt Plant with baghouseTunnel FurnaceTunnel FurnaceTunnel FurnaceCooling towerTunnel FurnaceHeat transfer tableHeat transfer tableHeat transfer tableExpandable Polystyrene LineWoodwaste Handling System ME 3675Woodwaste Handling System ME 3675Woodwaste Handling System (Baghouse 2)Woodwaste Handling System (Baghouse 2)Woodwaste Handling System ME 2700Woodwaste Handling System ME 2700Woodwaste Handling System ME 1188Woodwaste Handling System ME 1188Woodwaste Handling System ME 2152Woodwaste Handling System ME 2152Woodwaste Handling System ME 4123Woodwaste Handling System ME 4123

East metal dishrack coating lineEast metal dishrack coating lineWest metal dishrack coating lineWest metal dishrack coating lineSheet Coating Line No. 1, with Thermal IncineratorSheet Coating Line No. 2, with Thermal IncineratorDrawn and Ironed 2-Piece Food Can Line (Main Plant), with Thermal Oxidizer

Page 113: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Inner Tube Adhesive Application Line.Outer Tube Adhesive Application Line.3.71 natural gas-fired 1.5 TPH muffin griddle (baking oven).

south grinding line (including no. 2 Maximuller grinder, feed hopper, storage bin, screens and associated conveyors)Electric arc furnace operations (including charging, melting, tapping, slag skimming/handling, etc.)Electric arc furnace operations (including charging, melting, tapping, slag skimming/handling, etc.)Electric arc furnace operations (including charging, melting, tapping, slag skimming/handling, etc.)Electric arc furnace operations (including charging, melting, tapping, slag skimming/handling, etc.)Electric arc furnace operations (including charging, melting, tapping, slag skimming/handling, etc.)GFP 28 Zone KilnGFP 28 Zone KilnGFP 28 Zone KilnGFP 28 Zone KilnGFP 28 Zone KilnMSW Landfill - with asbestos disposal (used to be P001)MSW Landfill - with asbestos disposal (used to be P001)

105 ton/hr hammermill (shredder). Administrative modification to PTI 03-13640, issued 1/6/04, to update reporting r105 ton/hr hammermill (shredder). Administrative modification to PTI 03-13640, issued 1/6/04, to update reporting r

Rotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberRotary Kiln #2 with scrubberHazadous waste receiving and treatment injection systemHazadous waste receiving and treatment injection systemHazadous waste receiving and treatment injection systemHazadous waste receiving and treatment injection systemRobotic Spray Booth BLDG 35 modification of PTI 0313692 issued on November 15 2001 to add an additional robotic s

Page 114: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

municiple solid waste and asbestos landfill with associated material handling operations and an open flare.285 TPH drum mix asphalt plant.285 TPH drum mix asphalt plant.Pickling Line

Downdraft main paint boothNatural gas-fired 16 mmBtu/hr pelletized limestone dryerNatural gas-fired 16 mmBtu/hr pelletized limestone dryerNatural gas-fired 16 mmBtu/hr pelletized limestone dryerNatural gas-fired 16 mmBtu/hr pelletized limestone dryerNatural gas-fired 16 mmBtu/hr pelletized limestone dryerAnimal feed drier and processing line 1Animal feed drier and processing line 1Animal feed drier and processing line 1Animal feed drier and processing line 1Animal feed drier and processing line 1Animal feed drier and processing line 2Animal feed drier and processing line 2Animal feed drier and processing line 2Animal feed drier and processing line 2Animal feed drier and processing line 2Index coating line no. 1 vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer (administrative modification to PTI 03-13512, issuIndex coating line no.2 vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer (administrative modification to PTI 03-13512, issuRobot coating operation vented to a thermal oxidizer (administrative modifiction to PTI 03-13512, issued 4/24/01 to Chain on edge coating line no.1 vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer (administrative modifiction to PTI 03-1351Chain on edge coating line no. 2 vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer (administrative modification to PTI 03-13Index coating line no. 1 vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer (administrative modification to PTI 03-13512, issuIndex coating line no.2 vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer (administrative modification to PTI 03-13512, issuRobot coating operation vented to a thermal oxidizer (administrative modifiction to PTI 03-13512, issued 4/24/01 to Chain on edge coating line no.1 vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer (administrative modifiction to PTI 03-1351Chain on edge coating line no. 2 vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer (administrative modification to PTI 03-139211 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049211 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049211 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049211 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049211 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049211 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049211 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049211 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049211 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049212 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049212 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049212 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049212 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049212 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049212 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049212 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049212 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/20049212 Glass melting furnace(with electric boost), forehearth, and forming room - modification 5/20/2004Lead Oxide Storage Silo C (controlled by a baghouse S/N 198)Lead Oxide Storage Silo C (controlled by a baghouse S/N 198)

Page 115: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Sovema Oxide Mill 4 (controlled by Sovema baghouse w/HEPA S/N 256)Sovema Oxide Mill 4 (controlled by Sovema baghouse w/HEPA S/N 256)Sovema Day Tank 1 oxide storage (controlled by high efficiency fabric filter with secondary HEPA control - CyclonSovema Day Tank 1 oxide storage (controlled by high efficiency fabric filter with secondary HEPA control - CyclonSovema Day Tank 2 oxide storage (controlled by high efficiency fabric filter with secondary HEPA control - CyclonSovema Day Tank 2 oxide storage (controlled by high efficiency fabric filter with secondary HEPA control - CyclonSovema Day Tank 3 oxide storage (controlled by high efficiency fabric filter with secondary HEPA control - CyclonSovema Day Tank 3 oxide storage (controlled by high efficiency fabric filter with secondary HEPA control - CyclonBarton Truck unload tank 4 oxide storage (formerly Sovema Day Tank 4 - controlled by high efficiency fabric filteBarton Truck unload tank 4 oxide storage (formerly Sovema Day Tank 4 - controlled by high efficiency fabric filteSurge hopper 1 (controlled by Y3 baghouse joined with P067-P070, P078 & P074 (paste mixer 5 and oven 5 only) vSurge hopper 1 (controlled by Y3 baghouse joined with P067-P070, P078 & P074 (paste mixer 5 and oven 5 only) vSurge Hopper 2 (controlled by Y3 baghouse joined with P067-P070, P078 & P074 (paste mixer 5 and oven 5 only) vSurge Hopper 2 (controlled by Y3 baghouse joined with P067-P070, P078 & P074 (paste mixer 5 and oven 5 only) vSurge hopper 3 (controlled by Y3 baghouse joined with P067-P070, P078 & P074 (paste mixer 5 and oven 5 only) vSurge hopper 3 (controlled by Y3 baghouse joined with P067-P070, P078 & P074 (paste mixer 5 and oven 5 only) vSurge Hopper 4 (controlled by Y3 baghouse joined with P067-P070, P078 & P074 (paste mixer 5 and oven 5 only) vSurge Hopper 4 (controlled by Y3 baghouse joined with P067-P070, P078 & P074 (paste mixer 5 and oven 5 only) vbulk oxide silo A (controlled by BVF/Flex Kleen/Scientific DCs S/N 37)bulk oxide silo A (controlled by BVF/Flex Kleen/Scientific DCs S/N 37)75 ton per day natural gas fired pressed/blown glass furnace, F furnace, with particulate control by checker design75 ton per day natural gas fired pressed/blown glass furnace, F furnace, with particulate control by checker design75 ton per day natural gas fired pressed/blown glass furnace, F furnace, with particulate control by checker design75 ton per day natural gas fired pressed/blown glass furnace, F furnace, with particulate control by checker design75 ton per day natural gas fired pressed/blown glass furnace, F furnace, with particulate control by checker design75 ton per day natural gas fired pressed/blown glass furnace, F furnace, with particulate control by checker design75 ton per day natural gas fired pressed/blown glass furnace, F furnace, with particulate control by checker designplastisol line with thermal incineartorplastisol line with thermal incineartorplastisol line with thermal incineartorH-9401 Process HeaterH-604 Process Heater250 mmBtu per hour heater fired by refinery fuel gas and natural gasClaus sulfur recovery unit No. 1 and sulfur pit with tail gas unit and incinerator. Emissions from the Claus sulfur rec40.0 mmBtu/hr heater fired with natural gas or refinery fuel gas with low-NOx burners40.0 mmBtu/hr heater fired with natural gas or refinery fuel gas with low-NOx burners40.0 mmBtu/hr heater fired with natural gas or refinery fuel gas with low-NOx burners97 mmBtu/hr heater [H1] fired with refinery process gas, a mixture of refinery fuel gas, landfill gas and/or natural gas53 mmBtu/hr heater [H2] fired with refinery process gas, a mixture of refinery fuel gas, landfill gas and/or natural gasPlant 9-3 reformer, semi-regenerative type; uses an internal scrubbing system; Plant 4 flare (P009) is used as the coPlant 9-3 reformer, semi-regenerative type; uses an internal scrubbing system; Plant 4 flare (P009) is used as the coFormaldehyde manufacturing plant with catalytic incineratorFormaldehyde manufacturing plant with catalytic incineratorFormaldehyde manufacturing plant with catalytic incineratorResin manufacturing process with wet scrubber and catalytic incineratorResin manufacturing process with wet scrubber and catalytic incineratorResin manufacturing process with wet scrubber and catalytic incineratorResin manufacturing process with wet scrubber and catalytic incineratorResin manufacturing process with wet scrubber and catalytic incineratorResin manufacturing process with wet scrubber and catalytic incineratorFormaldehyde manufacturing plant with catalytic incineratorFormaldehyde manufacturing plant with catalytic incineratorNEVER INSTALLEDMMBtu/hr rating) and use of coal (1764 MMBtu/hr rating) as a backup fuel, controlled by a fabric filter

Page 116: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

H2 Plant Furnace 221 MMBtu per hrReformer 2 Regenerator Heater 30 MMBtu per hrIso 2 Feed Heaters: 97.4 mmBtu/hr process heater fired with refinery fuel gas, natural gas, and/or LP gasIso 2 Stabilizer Reboiler: 110 mmBtu/hr process heater fired with refinery fuel gas, natural gas, and/or LP gasIso 2 Splitter Reboiler: 110 mmBtu/hr process heater fired with refinery fuel gas, natural gas, and/or LP gas2.5 mmBtu/hr refinery fuel gas/natural gas fired asphalt tank heaterReformer 2 Furnace 285 MMBtu per hrADHT Stripper Reboiler 52 MMBtu per hrRiley Boiler 332 MMBtu per hrReformer 1 Regenerator Heater 4.5 MMBtu per hrReformer 1 Furnace 248 MMBtu per hrCrude 1 Furnace (PR-562954): 428 mmBtu/hr (HHV) process heater fired with refinery fuel gas, natural gas, and/or Coker 1 Furnace 91 MMBtu per hrCoker II Heater (PR-562941): 80 mmBtu/hr (HHV) (72 mmBtu/hr LHV) process heater fired with refinery fuel gas, naFCC Preheat Furnace 103 MMBtu per hrCrude Vac 2 Heater PR-562945: 258 mmBtu/hr (HHV rated) process heater fired with refinery fuel gas, natural gas,Power Boiler 291 MMBtu per hrNaphtha Treater Heater (PR-562958): 80 mmBtu/hr process heater fired with refinery fuel gas, natural gas, and/or Process Heater (PR-560002) for A-Train Diesel Hydrotreaer: 22.8 mmBtu/hr (HHV rated) fired with refinery fuel gas,B-GOT Furnace (PR-560001): 57.6 mmBtu per hour heater fired with refinery fuel gas and/or natural gas, Process HeatVacuum 1 process heater (PR-560003): 140 MMBtu/hr high heating value (130 mmBtu/hr LHV) rated heater. Heater B-GOT Furnace 2 (PR-560010): 33 mmBtu/hr heater fired with refinery fuel gas and/or natural gas, Process Heater forFluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) consisting of an FCC Reactor, Catalyst Regenerator, Fractionator, StrippeEast Alstom Boiler (PR-562969): 353 mmBtu/hr heater fired with refinery fuel gas and/or natural gas with ultra low West Alstom Boiler (PR-562970): 353 mmBtu/hr heater fired with refinery fuel gas and/or natural gas with ultra lowSulfur Recovery Unit #2 and #3 with common tail gas treater, thermal oxidizer, and flareCoker 3 Furnace (PR-560004): 255 mmBtu/hr (HHV) process heater, (230 mmBtu/hr LHV), fired with refinery fuel gaThe East Hydrocarbon flare is part of the refinery's hydrocarbon flare system that controls both routine, emergencyThe West Hydrocarbon flare is part of the refinery's hydrocarbon flare system that controls both routine, emergencyThe East Acid Gas Flare is used for emergency releases of acid gas. This emission unit includes acid gas flare pilTRP SRU Acid Gas Flare is used for emergency releases of acid gas. This emission unit includes flare pilot emissiSRU #1 Acid Gas Flare is used for emergency emergency releases and for control of emissions from Foul Water StoraWest Alstom Boiler (PR-562970): 353 mmBtu/hr heater fired with refinery fuel gas and/or natural gas with ultra lowEast Alstom Boiler (PR-562969): 353 mmBtu/hr heater fired with refinery fuel gas and/or natural gas with ultra low Sulfur Recovery Unit #2 and #3 with common tail gas treater, thermal oxidizer, and flare

Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) consisting of an FCC Reactor, Catalyst Regenerator, Fractionator, StrippeWest Alstom Boiler (PR-562970): 353 mmBtu/hr heater fired with refinery fuel gas and/or natural gas with ultra lowSulfur Recovery Unit (SRU) 1, 120 long tons per day, with tail gas treatment unit and thermal oxidizer. This EU also Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) consisting of an FCC Reactor, Catalyst Regenerator, Fractionator, StrippeFluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) consisting of an FCC Reactor, Catalyst Regenerator, Fractionator, StrippeFluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) consisting of an FCC Reactor, Catalyst Regenerator, Fractionator, StrippeFluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) consisting of an FCC Reactor, Catalyst Regenerator, Fractionator, StrippeFluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) consisting of an FCC Reactor, Catalyst Regenerator, Fractionator, StrippeSulfuric Acid regeneration : A Plant with dual absorption and oxygen enrichmentSulfuric Acid regeneration: B-plant with dual absorption and oxygen enrichmentHydrogen Reformer Train 1 - 514 MMBtu/hr methane steam reformer train with low NOx burners and selective catalyt

MMBtu/hr rating) and use of coal (1764 MMBtu/hr rating) as a backup fuel, controlled by a fabric filterMMBtu/hr rating) and use of coal (1764 MMBtu/hr rating) as a backup fuel, controlled by a fabric filterMMBtu/hr rating) and use of coal (1764 MMBtu/hr rating) as a backup fuel, controlled by a fabric filter

Page 117: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Hydrogen Reformer Train 1 - 514 MMBtu/hr methane steam reformer train with low NOx burners and selective catalytHydrogen Reformer Train 1 - 514 MMBtu/hr methane steam reformer train with low NOx burners and selective catalytHydrogen Reformer Train 1 - 514 MMBtu/hr methane steam reformer train with low NOx burners and selective catalytHydrogen Reformer Train 2 - 514 MMBtu/hr methane steam reformer train with low NOx burners and selective catalytHydrogen Reformer Train 2 - 514 MMBtu/hr methane steam reformer train with low NOx burners and selective catalytHydrogen Reformer Train 2 - 514 MMBtu/hr methane steam reformer train with low NOx burners and selective catalytHydrogen Reformer Train 2 - 514 MMBtu/hr methane steam reformer train with low NOx burners and selective catalytAggregate processing plant (crusher, screen, conveyors)powered by a 438 hp diesel engine200 tph portable aggregate processing processing plant (crusher, screen, conveyors)6F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (66F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (66F1 float glass melting furnace (23.8 tons glass draw per hour) fueled by natural gas and/or #2 fuel oil with no contr6F1 float glass melting furnace (23.8 tons glass draw per hour) fueled by natural gas and/or #2 fuel oil with no contr6F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (66F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (66F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (66F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (66F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (66F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (66F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (66F3 Float Glass Melting Furnace - 29.8 tons of glass draw per hour, natural gas-fired float glass melting furnace (6Heatset printing press 350 with catalytic incineratorHeatset printing press 380 with catalytic incineratorHalf Web 6 Unit Offset Lithographic Printing Press and Catalytic Afterburner9 unit web heatset lithographic printing press (HWOPL)9 unit web heatset lithographic printing pressPolyurethane foam molding line 2Polyurethane foam molding line 2Polyurethane foam molding line 1Polyurethane foam molding line 1Polyurethane foam molding line 2Polyurethane foam molding line 2Polyurethane foam molding line 1Polyurethane foam molding line 1125 TPH asphalt plant (P902)125 TPH asphalt plant (P902)125 TPH asphalt plant (P902)125 TPH asphalt plant (P902)125 TPH asphalt plant (P902)125 TPH asphalt plant (P902)2000 Ton Hot Forging Press w/ Oil Mist CollectorPlastic parts coating line (including): air supply houses, bake oven, thermal incinerator, and oversprayPlastic parts coating line (including): air supply houses, bake oven, thermal incinerator, and oversprayPOWDER MAKING OPERATIONPOWDER MAKING OPERATIONSINTERING FURNACE W/TORIT FILTERSINTERING FURNACE W/TORIT FILTERSINTERING FURNACE W/TORIT FILTERSINTERING FURNACE W/TORIT FILTERSMALL MILL FLAPPING UNIT W/VENTURI SCRUBBERSMALL MILL FLAPPING UNIT W/VENTURI SCRUBBERLARGE MILL FLAPPER W/ROTOCLONELARGE MILL FLAPPER W/ROTOCLONEFlapping Unit, Rolling Mill

Page 118: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Flapping Unit, Rolling MillPOWDER MAKING OPERATIONPOWDER MAKING OPERATIONFlapping Unit, Rolling MillFlapping Unit, Rolling MillLARGE MILL FLAPPER W/ROTOCLONELARGE MILL FLAPPER W/ROTOCLONE

Alloy claddingSolution heat treating and flapping operationsPED Engine Testing dynamometers with nine (9) test stands and two thermal oxidizersPED Engine Testing dynamometers with nine (9) test stands and two thermal oxidizersPED Engine Testing dynamometers with nine (9) test stands and two thermal oxidizers370 lb/hr compression molding machine, Press Line 115370 lb/hr compression molding machine, Press Line 115370 lb/hr compression molding machine, Press Line 115Foam extrusion line 1 with incineratorFoam extrusion line 2 with incinerator

200 Ton Per Hour Asphalt Batch Plant Administrative Modification200 Ton Per Hour Asphalt Batch Plant Administrative Modification200 Ton Per Hour Asphalt Batch Plant Administrative Modification200 Ton Per Hour Asphalt Batch Plant Administrative Modification200 Ton Per Hour Asphalt Batch Plant Administrative Modification200 Ton Per Hour Asphalt Batch Plant Administrative ModificationDry Bottom, Roof-Fired, COAL-FIRED BOILER #5 rated at 647 MMBtu/hrDry Bottom, Roof-Fired, COAL-FIRED BOILER #6Dry Bottom, Roof-Fired, COAL-FIRED BOILER #6

New Unit 3 Coal Delivery BeltCombustion Engineering model 7868 pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler(Unit 4 Main Boiler), having a nominal capaElectric Generation.Riley model 3403 pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler(Unit 3 Main Boiler), having a nominal capacity of 1862 millioElectric Generation.644.0 mmBtu/hr wood fired boiler fired by natural gas, wood residue, waste water sludge, and waste paper rejects.Desulfurization and inoculation ladles - Ladles 380.B4 & H9Jolt shakeoutJolt sand systemBabcock and Wilcox Open Pass, Pulverized Coal Fired Wet Bottom BoilerBabcock and Wilcox Open Pass, Pulverized Coal Fired Wet Bottom BoilerBabcock and Wilcox Open Pass, Pulverized Coal Fired Wet Bottom BoilerBabcock and Wilcox Open Pass, Pulverized Coal Fired Wet Bottom BoilerBabcock and Wilcox Open Pass, Pulverized Coal Fired Wet Bottom BoilerFluidized Bed Slag DryerRecip. Engine 11A, Cooper Bessemer GMWA-10Recip. Engine 11A, Cooper Bessemer GMWA-10Recip. Engine 13A, Cooper Bessemer GMWA-10Recip. Engine 13A, Cooper Bessemer GMWA-10Recip. Engine 12A, Cooper Bessemer GMWA-10Recip. Engine 12A, Cooper Bessemer GMWA-10

3,400 hp3,400 hp3,400 hp3,400 hp

Page 119: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Paint Booth 1 (Modified VOC Concentrator Operational Restriction)Paint Booth 2 (Modified VOC Concentrator Operational Restriction)Clearcoat Booth 2 (Modified VOC Concentrator Operational Restriction)Clearcoat Booth 1 (Modified VOC Concentrator Operational Restriction)Multiple Hearth Roaster6.05 Tons per hour (tph) Techniceram natural gas fired Tunnel Kiln with dryer(P901) - 300 TPH portable Eagle Manufacturing model 1400-45 stone crusher with screens, conveyors and water spr200 TPH Hot Mix Asphalt Plant200 TPH Hot Mix Asphalt Plant200 TPH Hot Mix Asphalt Plant200 TPH Hot Mix Asphalt Plant200 TPH Hot Mix Asphalt Plant200 TPH Hot Mix Asphalt Plant9 ft Cooling DrumCupola melting furnaceCupola melting furnaceCupola melting furnace

Crude Gold Kettle 2 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batchCrude Gold Kettle 2 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batchCrude Gold Kettle 2 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batchCrude Gold Kettle 2 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batchCrude Gold Kettle 4 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batchCrude Gold Kettle 4 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batchCrude Gold Kettle 4 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batchCrude Gold Kettle 4 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batchSO2 Kettle 2 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.SO2 Kettle 2 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.SO2 Kettle 2 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.SO2 Kettle 2 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.Fine Gold Kettle 3 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.Fine Gold Kettle 3 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.Fine Gold Kettle 3 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.Fine Gold Kettle 3 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.Fine Gold Kettle 4 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.Fine Gold Kettle 4 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.Fine Gold Kettle 4 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.Fine Gold Kettle 4 vented to a wet scrubber. 2300 troy oz max/batch.Silver Hydrolysis Reactor. 15000 troy oz max/batch.Silver Hydrolysis Reactor. 15000 troy oz max/batch.Silver Hydrolysis Reactor. 15000 troy oz max/batch.Silver Hydrolysis Reactor. 15000 troy oz max/batch.Unit 1-2 Auxiliary Boiler - BW Auxiliary Boiler - 652.58 million Btu/hr heat inputUnit 1-2 Auxiliary Boiler - BW Auxiliary Boiler - 652.58 million Btu/hr heat inputUnit 1-2 Auxiliary Boiler - BW Auxiliary Boiler - 652.58 million Btu/hr heat inputUnit 1-2 Auxiliary Boiler - BW Auxiliary Boiler - 652.58 million Btu/hr heat inputUnit 1-2 Auxiliary Boiler - BW Auxiliary Boiler - 652.58 million Btu/hr heat inputUnit 1-2 Auxiliary Boiler - BW Auxiliary Boiler - 652.58 million Btu/hr heat inputUnit 3 - Babcock and Wilcox, pulverized coal-fired, dry bottom, wall-fired boiler, having a nominal capacity of 5,975 Unit 2 - Babcock and Wilcox, pulverized coal-fired, dry bottom, wall-fired boiler, having a nominal capacity of 5,275 Unit 1 - Babcock and Wilcox, pulverized coal-fired, dry bottom, wall-fired boiler, having a nominal capacity of 5,275

Page 120: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Blast Furnace Number Five with 4500 tons per day maximum iron production.Babcock and Wilcox pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler, having a nominal capacity of 3000 million Btu/hr, and conBabcock and Wilcox pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler, having a nominal capacity of 6066 million Btu/hr, and conBabcock and Wilcox pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler, having a nominal capacity of 6066 million Btu/hr, and conFoster-Wheeler pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler, having a nominal capacity of 1822 million Btu/hr, and controlleFoster-Wheeler pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler, having a nominal capacity of 1822 million Btu/hr, and controlleFoster Wheeler pulverized coal and oil-fired, dry-bottom boiler, having a nominal capacity of 1822 million Btu/hr, and coFoster Wheeler pulverized coal and oil-fired, dry-bottom boiler, having a nominal capacity of 1822 million Btu/hr, and co

400 TPH Counter flow hot mix asphalt plant with a settling chamber and baghouse400 TPH Counter flow hot mix asphalt plant with a settling chamber and baghouse400 TPH Counter flow hot mix asphalt plant with a settling chamber and baghouse400 TPH Counter flow hot mix asphalt plant with a settling chamber and baghouse400 TPH Counter flow hot mix asphalt plant with a settling chamber and baghouse

Page 121: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

400 TPH Counter flow hot mix asphalt plant with a settling chamber and baghouseNo. 1 Anneal and Pickle line vented to 2 packed tower wet scrubbers (both with a control efficiency of 98%) with aNo. 1 Anneal and Pickle line vented to 2 packed tower wet scrubbers (both with a control efficiency of 98%) with aHot end surface treatment controlled by ammonia injection and a baghouse. (This EU covers 5 hot end surface treatmeHot end surface treatment controlled by ammonia injection and a baghouse. (This EU covers 5 hot end surface treatmeHot end surface treatment controlled by ammonia injection and a baghouse. (This EU covers 5 hot end surface treatmeHot end surface treatment controlled by ammonia injection and a baghouse. (This EU covers 5 hot end surface treatmeHot end surface treatment controlled by ammonia injection and a baghouse. (This EU covers 5 hot end surface treatmeHot end surface treatment controlled by ammonia injection and a baghouse. (This EU covers 5 hot end surface treatme200 TPH Screen and transfer points with attached 215 HP generatorEljay Crusher (350 TPH) and attached 300 HP diesel generatorPortable IROCK 300 Aggregate Crushing Plant rated at 650 TPH.Aggregate Handling-Modified

4424 Portable Screener with attached 110 HP Cummins Generator400 TPH Deister Triple Deck Horizontal Screening Plant

Laminator No. 7 controlled with a catalytic incinerator (administrative modification to clarify that laminators 1 and 5 are5000 TPD MSW landfill operations with solidification process and asbestos disposal vented to a flare.5000 TPD MSW landfill operations with solidification process and asbestos disposal vented to a flare.Process Curing OvenProcess Curing OvenStarkaire Fluid Bed Dryer vented to a wet scrubber (old P010) - modification300 TPH portable drum mix asphalt plant controlled with a baghouse300 TPH portable drum mix asphalt plant controlled with a baghouse300 TPH portable drum mix asphalt plant controlled with a baghouse300 TPH portable drum mix asphalt plant controlled with a baghouse300 TPH portable drum mix asphalt plant controlled with a baghouse300 TPH portable drum mix asphalt plant controlled with a baghouse

Flatline Finishing System Administrative Modification to PTI 06 06245 issued January 30 2001.Specialty Booth Finishing System.Stain Roll Coater/Oven Administrative Modification to PTI 06 04702 issued March 27 1996.Cefla Line Roll Coater no 1 UV Lamp Administrative Modification PTI 06 04702 issued March 27 1996.Cefla Line Roll Coater no 2 UV Lamp Administrative Modification to PTI 06 04702 issued March 27 1996.Backline Finishing System.Woodworking equipment vented to baghouse #2Wood Waste Baghouse #17Derated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDF

Ohio EPA was notified by MASCO that this unit was removed from the site 6/19/2011.

Page 122: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Derated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDFDerated No. 6 Wood Residue Boiler from 539 MMBtu/hr to 400 MMBtu/hr capable of burning Tire Derived Fuel(TDF

Sand recycler consisting of a feeding bin, conveyor, sizing screen and sand bunkerRoadways and Parking Areas (Portable with the East Sparta Limestone Plant)11.4 MMBTU/HR Wood Fired Boiler System11.4 MMBTU/HR Wood Fired Boiler SystemElectric generation.Portable Screener No. 2 with 1 load-in conveyor and 2 load-out conveyors.rebuild of the K-1 unit which was originally constructed in 1962 and listed with OEPA as source number P003Carbon Black Unit Number 1Carbon Black Unit Number 1Carbon Black Unit Number 1Carbon Black Unit Number 1Carbon Black Unit Number 2Carbon Black Unit Number 2Carbon Black Unit Number 2Carbon Black Unit Number 2Carbon Black Unit Number 1 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 1 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 1 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 1 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 1 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 1 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 2 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 2 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 2 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 2 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 2 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 2 DryerCarbon Black Unit Number 3Carbon Black Unit Number 3Carbon Black Unit Number 3Carbon Black Unit Number 3Carbon Black Unit Number 3Carbon Black Unit Number 3Carbon Black Unit Number 4Carbon Black Unit Number 4Carbon Black Unit Number 4Carbon Black Unit Number 4Carbon Black Unit Number 4Carbon Black Unit Number 4Tanker truck loading rack controlled with a VRUTanker truck loading rack controlled with a VRUSubmerged Arc Furnace

Page 123: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Submerged Arc FurnaceSubmerged Arc FurnaceSubmerged Arc FurnaceSubmerged Arc FurnaceSubmerged Arc FurnaceSubmerged Arc FurnaceSubmerged Arc FurnaceSubmerged Arc Furnace50 MMBtu/hr Natural Gas-Fired Dowtherm Process Heater50 MMBtu/hr Natural Gas-Fired Dowtherm Process Heater50 MMBtu/hr Natural Gas-Fired Dowtherm Process HeaterB001- Babcock and Wilcox boiler172 MW GE 7FA natural gas fired dry low NOx (DLN) combustion turbine No. 1 with duct firing operating in combine172 MW GE 7FA natural gas fired dry low NOx (DLN) combustion turbine No. 2 with duct firing operating in combine172 MW GE 7FA natural gas fired dry low NOx (DLN) combustion turbine No. 3 with duct firing operating in combine172 MW GE 7FA natural gas fired dry low NOx (DLN) combustion turbine No. 4 with duct firing operating in combine192 mmBtu per hour boiler (2001-UA) fired with: light hydrocarbon by-product fuel; heavy hydrocarbon by-product fuel; 192 mmBtu per hour boiler (2001-UA) fired with: light hydrocarbon by-product fuel; heavy hydrocarbon by-product fuel;

Wheelabrator 1

west iron cupola: melting of metallic materials to form molten gray iron castings controlled with a venturi scrubber

Electric Holding Furnace

Disamatic No 2 Mold Making Pouring Cooling and Shakeoutstand grindersshotblaster No 1Shotblaster No 2shotblaster No 3Disamatic #1 Pouring and Cooling - Modification to increase maximum process rate to 12.5 tons of iron per hourDisamatic #2 Pouring and Cooling - Modification to increase maximum process rate to 12.5 tons of iron per hourElectric Holding Furnace - Modification to increase maximum process rate to 25 tons of iron per hourElectric Induction Furnace CElectric Induction Furnace A - Modification to increase melt rate to 25 tons per hour from furnaces A, B, and C combElectric Induction Furnace B - Modification to increase melt rate to 25 tons per hour from furnaces A, B, and C combsand and bond unloading and storage systemsouth cooling drumSand MullerChain-on-Edge Paint Booth79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine

Page 124: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbine79.1 mmBtu/hr Natural Gas Turbineadhesive paper coating process with two roll coaters with dip tanks, a flexographic printer, and drying oven, with a Cement Transfer to Bag PackersColored Cement Packing LineGray Cement Packing LineFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghousFour stage preheater cement kiln with in line raw mill, low NOx burner and two stacks. Main kiln stack with baghous183 mmBtu/hour coal-fired spreader stoker boiler No. 5, with baghouse control, Building 20770 (2033)183 mmBtu/hour coal-fired spreader stoker boiler No. 5, with baghouse control, Building 20770 (2033)169 mmBtu/hour natural gas fired boiler No. 3, Building 20770 (2028)169 mmBtu/hour natural gas fired boiler No. 3, Building 20770 (2028)169 mmBtu/hour natural gas fired boiler No. 3, Building 20770 (2028)169 mmBtu/hour natural gas fired boiler No. 3, Building 20770 (2028)183 mmBtu/hour coal-fired spreader stoker boiler No. 4, with baghouse control, Building 20770 (2030)183 mmBtu/hour coal-fired spreader stoker boiler No. 4, with baghouse control, Building 20770 (2030)400 tons per year portable drum mix asphaltic concrete plant400 tons per year portable drum mix asphaltic concrete plant400 tons per year portable drum mix asphaltic concrete plant400 tons per year portable drum mix asphaltic concrete plant400 tons per year portable drum mix asphaltic concrete plant400 tons per year portable drum mix asphaltic concrete plantPressure sensitive tapes and labels manufacture and coating line. Long Line Coater.Pressure sensitive tapes and labels manufacture and coating line. Long Line Coater.Petroleum products loading rack with activated carbon vapor recovery unitDipline A and Oven, Misc. Metal Parts, with a Permanent Total Enclosure, Fume Concentrator, and a Catalytic IncinDipline B and Oven, Misc. Metal Parts, with a Permanent Total Enclosure, Fume COncentrator, and a Catalytic IncinCOE Line #1 A and 2 Ovens, Misc. Metal Parts, with a Permanent Total Enclosure, Fume Concentrator, and a CatalytCOE Line #1 B and Oven, Misc. Metal Parts, with a Permanent Total Enclosure, Fume Concentrator, and a Catalytic COE Line #2 B and 2 Ovens, Misc. Metal Parts, with a Permanent Total Enclosure, Fume Concentrator, and a CatalytCOE Line #3 A/#3 B and Oven, Misc. Metal Parts, with a Permanent Total Enclosure, Fume Concentrator, and a CatalCOE Line #4 and Oven, Misc. Metal Parts, with a Permanent Total Enclosure, Fume Concentrator, and a Catalytic InCOE Line #5 and Oven, Misc. Metal Parts, with a Permanent Total Enclosure, Fume Concentrator, and a Catalytic InAdhesive Mixing Room, with a Permanent Total Enclosure, Fume Concentrator, and a Catalytic Incinerator *ModifieSingle Station Adhesive Coating Cell - Misc. Metal Parts *ModificationSouth Mill Steep Aspiration with scrubbing control

Page 125: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

72 MM/Btu natural gas-fired steam generating unit72 MM/Btu natural gas-fired steam generating unit72 MM/Btu natural gas-fired steam generating unit72 MM/Btu natural gas-fired steam generating unit72 MM/Btu natural gas-fired steam generating unit72 MM/Btu natural gas-fired steam generating unit350 TPH portable asphalt drum mix plant, with baghouse350 TPH portable asphalt drum mix plant, with baghouse350 TPH portable asphalt drum mix plant, with baghouse150 mmBTU/hr coal spreader stoker boiler; Boiler No. 3, with cyclone and baghouse150 mmBTU/hr coal spreader stoker boiler; Boiler No. 3, with cyclone and baghouse150 mmBTU/hr coal spreader stoker boiler; Boiler No. 3, with cyclone and baghouse150 mmBtu/hr coal spreader stoker and natural gas boiler; Boiler No. 4 with cyclone and baghouse150 mmBtu/hr coal spreader stoker and natural gas boiler; Boiler No. 4 with cyclone and baghouse150 mmBtu/hr coal spreader stoker and natural gas boiler; Boiler No. 4 with cyclone and baghousepulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 696 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 703 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 701 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 701 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 701 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 727 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 727 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 727 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 720 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 696 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 696 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 720 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 720 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 703 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 703 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 736 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 736 MMBtu/hr maximum hpulverized, dry bottom, tangentially fired coal-fired utility boiler (Combustion Engineering); 736 MMBtu/hr maximum h500 gal. mixing vessel, TK1001 with condenser;150 gal. emulsifier feed tank, TK1001-2; 1000 gal. stripping vessel Clear Adhesives Manufacturing, Mixing Vessel 1027DNSB Adhesives Manufacturing, Mixing Vessels 1028 and 1029 with RTOPrepolymer Kettle 420 with receiver condenser and RTOPrepolymer kettle 421 with receiver condenser and RTOPrepolymer kettle 422 with receiver condenser and RTOAutoclave 423 with receiver, condenser and RTOAutoclave 424 with receiver, condenser and RTOAutoclave 425 with receiver, condenser and RTOAutoclave 426 with receiver, condenser and RTOResin Dissolving Tank 431 with condenser and RTOResin dissolving tank 433 with condenser and RTOResin Dissolving Tank 432 with condenser and RTOAdhesive Reactor 141 with reflux condenser, solvent receiver, vacuum pump and chilled water/glycol (mixed) condeReactor 145 with condenser and RTOMixing Vessel 124 receiver common with 125 with condenser and RTORecycled Polymer holding tank 434 and RTOMixing vessel 125 receiver comm with 124 with condenser and RTOMixing vessel 126 receiver common with 127 with condenser and RTOMixing vessel 127 receiver common with 126 with condenser and RTO6,000 gallon storage tank vented to thermal oxidizer; TK-816

Page 126: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Digester silo and rotary exothermic dryer, with feed end controlled by Venturi and W. W. Sly scrubbers (in series)Digester silo and rotary exothermic dryer, with feed end controlled by Venturi and W. W. Sly scrubbers (in series)COAL-FIRED UTILITY BOILER FOR ELECTRIC GENERATION - 2239 MMBTU/HR

84" hot dip galvanizing line anneal furnace for steel strip84" hot dip galvanizing line anneal furnace for steel stripPlant #2 - Pigment Kettle #3Plant #1 ink base, ink and toner pigments manufacturing line - a 400-lb and a 800-lb kettle in parallel, transfer equiPlant #1 ink base, ink and toner pigments manufacturing line - a 400-lb and a 800-lb kettle in parallel, transfer equiPlant #1 - 2nd Floor - Myers Kettle, Alkyd Kettle, Grinder, 5-gal Mixer, 2500 Tank, LOx Tank, Target Coating Tank, Steel pickling line using heated hydrochloric acid controlled by a wet scrubberMixer station, portable process tanks up to 500 gallons, tank cleaning station, container filling station, ventilation sy

electric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDDust silo MODIFIED150 TPH capacity Vacuum Oxygen Degasser (VOD) vessel MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDelectric arc furnace 110 TPH capacity, for the melting of scrap steel. MODIFIEDMultiple Hearth Incinerator # 3, 3.6 dry sludge tons/hour (rated capacity) equipped with a venturi/impingement scrubShale crushing and screening system consisting of a 300 ton per hour mobile jaw crusher, two front end loaders, 21 cShale crushing and screening system consisting of a 300 ton per hour mobile jaw crusher, two front end loaders, 21 cShale crushing and screening system consisting of a 300 ton per hour mobile jaw crusher, two front end loaders, 21 cRotary kiln for processing shale, primarily fueled by coal.Shale crushing and screening system consisting of a 300 ton per hour mobile jaw crusher, two front end loaders, 21 cShale crushing and screening system consisting of a 300 ton per hour mobile jaw crusher, two front end loaders, 21 cShale crushing and screening system consisting of a 300 ton per hour mobile jaw crusher, two front end loaders, 21 cTraveling grate clinker cooler.Modification of a flexible graphite Rolling Line RL 4 consisting of two gas-fired furnaces and rollers equipped with Modification of a flexible graphite Rolling Line RL 4 consisting of two gas-fired furnaces and rollers equipped with Modification of a flexible graphite Rolling Line RL 4 consisting of two gas-fired furnaces and rollers equipped with Modification of a flexible graphite Rolling Line RL 4 consisting of two gas-fired furnaces and rollers equipped with Modification of a flexible graphite Rolling Line RL 4 consisting of two gas-fired furnaces and rollers equipped with Modification of a flexible graphite Rolling Line RL 4 consisting of two gas-fired furnaces and rollers equipped with Rocking Furnace F-3 rated at 8.0MM BTU/hr using an oxy-fuel burner to melt brass and bronze scrap metal.Rocking Furnace F-3 rated at 8.0MM BTU/hr using an oxy-fuel burner to melt brass and bronze scrap metal.

Flynn Dreffein #1 and #2 (electrically disconnected, but remain at facility)

9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas

Page 127: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gas9.06 MMBtu per hour Caterpillar internal combustion engine for the burning of landfill gasPaint mixing area including two automated electrostratic rotating disk spray systems and two manual electrostatic spPaint mixing area including two automated electrostratic rotating disk spray systems and two manual electrostatic spPaint mixing area including two automated electrostratic rotating disk spray systems and two manual electrostatic sp200 TPH Portable Concrete Recycling Plant150 TPY Asphalt Batch Plant w/scrubber150 TPY Asphalt Batch Plant w/scrubber150 TPY Asphalt Batch Plant w/scrubber150 TPY Asphalt Batch Plant w/scrubber150 TPY Asphalt Batch Plant w/scrubber150 TPY Asphalt Batch Plant w/scrubber238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and suppleme238 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal/fuel oil-fired boiler (including 20 MMBtu natural gas burners for startup and supplemeRoller coating and drying rack operation84.65 Megawatt (Nominal) Simple-Cycle Combustion Turbine No.184.65 Megawatt (Nominal) Simple-Cycle Combustion Turbine No 284.65 Megawatt (Nominal) simple-cycle combustion turbine No. 384.65 Megawatt (Nominal) simple-cycle combustion turbine No. 484.65 Megawatt (Nominal) simple-cycle combustion turbine No. 584.65 Megawatt (Nominal) simple-cycle combustion turbine No. 684.65 Megawatt (Nominal) simple-cycle combustion turbine No. 784.65 Megawatt (Nominal) simple-cycle combustion turbine No. 8No. 15 Basic Oxygen FurnaceNo. 15 Basic Oxygen FurnaceNo. 15 Basic Oxygen FurnaceNo. 15 Basic Oxygen FurnaceNo. 15 Basic Oxygen FurnaceNo. 15 Basic Oxygen Furnace740 TPH Blast FurnaceNo. 15 Basic Oxygen Furnace740 TPH Blast FurnaceContinuous steel pickling lineNo. 15 Basic Oxygen Furnace15 mmBtu/hr Konus Dutch Oven-type Wood-fired Heat Exchanger w/Multiclone15 mmBtu/hr Konus Dutch Oven-type Wood-fired Heat Exchanger w/Multiclone

Page 128: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

15 mmBtu/hr Konus Dutch Oven-type Wood-fired Heat Exchanger w/Multiclone17.8 mmBtu/hr Konus Dutch Oven-type Wood-fired Heat Exchanger w/Multiclone17.8 mmBtu/hr Konus Dutch Oven-type Wood-fired Heat Exchanger w/Multiclone17.8 mmBtu/hr Konus Dutch Oven-type Wood-fired Heat Exchanger w/Multiclone13.68 mmBtu/hr Konus Suspension-type Wood-fired Heat Exchanger w/Multiclones and oil-fired preheat burner - Mod13.68 mmBtu/hr Konus Suspension-type Wood-fired Heat Exchanger w/Multiclones and oil-fired preheat burner - Mod13.68 mmBtu/hr Konus Suspension-type Wood-fired Heat Exchanger w/Multiclones and oil-fired preheat burner - Mod420 mmBtu/hr pulverized-dry bottom coal-fired boiler, with No. 2 fuel oil burners for ignition and supplemental firing249 MMBtu/hour coal and tire derived fuel boiler with an ESP - modification249 MMBtu/hour coal and tire derived fuel boiler with an ESP - modification249 MMBtu/hour coal and tire derived fuel boiler with an ESP - modificationNatural Gas-Fired Boiler equipped with low NOx burners (Original coal-fired boiler installed in 1964 retrofitted to co729 mmBtu/hour Pulverized Coal and Natural Gas-Fired Boiler, equipped with a lime injection dry scrubber system andMiscellaneous Metal Parts Coating Line, consisting of three duplex spray coating application stations, a powder coatMiscellaneous Metal Parts Coating Line, consisting of three duplex spray coating application stations, a powder coatBoiler No. 2 - 95 mmBtu/hour Vibragrate Coal/Natural Gas-Fired Boiler equipped with baghouse and scrubberBoiler No. 3 - 95 mmBtu/hour Vibragrate Coal/Natural Gas-Fired Boiler equipped with baghouse and scrubberBoiler No. 4 - 132 mmBtu/hour Natural Gas and No. 2 Fuel Oil-fired BoilerBoiler No. 1 - 95 mmBtu/hour Vibragrate Coal, Natural Gas, and No. 2 Fuel Oil-fired Boiler equipped with baghouse5732 KW Lean Burn Natural Gas Fired 4-stroke Reciprocating Engine5732 KW Lean Burn Natural Gas Fired 4-stroke Reciprocating Engine

400 TPH Portable Crusher and Screen603 MMBtu/hr Natural-Gas Fired Auxiliary Boiler A, with fuel oil backup603 MMBtu/hr Natural-Gas Fired Auxiliary Boiler A, with fuel oil backup603 MMBtu/hr Natural-Gas Fired Auxiliary Boiler B, with fuel oil backup603 MMBtu/hr Natural-Gas Fired Auxiliary Boiler B, with fuel oil backup1426 MW coal fired boiler1426 MW coal fired boiler2367 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP3979 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP2367 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP3979 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP2367 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP2367 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP3979 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP999 MmBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP971 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP1423 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP1423 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP971 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP999 MmBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP999 MmBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP1215 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Wall Fired Boiler, with ESP1215 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Wall Fired Boiler, with ESP971 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Tangentially Fired Boiler, with ESP1215 MMBtu/hr Pulverized Coal Dry Bottom Wall Fired Boiler, with ESPplastic polymer compounding and extrusion processplastic polymer compounding and extrusion processplastic polymer compounding and extrusion processplastic polymer compounding and extrusion process

Page 129: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

plastic polymer compounding and extrusion processplastic polymer compounding and extrusion processplastic polymer compounding and extrusion processplastic polymer compounding and extrusion processplastic polymer compounding and extrusion process155 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler155 mmBtu/hr coal fired boilerplastic polymer compounding and extrusion processcontinuous polymer drying operationcontinuous polymer drying operationplastic polymer compounding and extrusion processplastic polymer compounding and extrusion processplastic polymer compounding and extrusion process155 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler155 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler116 mmBtu/hr boiler116 mmBtu/hr gas/oil/other fired boilerOzonolysis Process III with catalytic incinerator and scrubber run in series to control organic compounds - ModificatiOzonolysis Process II with catalytic incinerator and scrubber run in series to control organic compounds - Modificati683 MMBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, fuel oil, liquid process waste or coal.Ozonolysis Process II with catalytic incinerator and scrubber run in series to control organic compounds - ModificatiOzonolysis Process III with catalytic incinerator and scrubber run in series to control organic compounds - Modificati683 MMBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, fuel oil, liquid process waste or coal.683 MMBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, fuel oil, liquid process waste or coal.683 MMBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, fuel oil, liquid process waste or coal.683 MMBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, fuel oil, liquid process waste or coal.683 MMBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, fuel oil, liquid process waste or coal.Ozonolysis Process II with catalytic incinerator and scrubber run in series to control organic compounds - ModificatiOzonolysis Process III with catalytic incinerator and scrubber run in series to control organic compounds - Modificati90 mmBtu/hr traveling grate coal-fired boiler controlled with a multiclone90 mmBtu/hr traveling grate coal-fired boiler controlled with a multiclone90 mmBtu/hr traveling grate coal-fired boiler controlled with a multiclone51.7 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler51.7 mmBtu/hr coal fired boiler1.5 MW Diesel fuel-fired internal combustion engine13.5 MW Natural Gas/ No. 2 Fuel Oil-fired Turbines with 98.5 mmBtu/hr duct burner13.5 MW Natural Gas/ No. 2 Fuel Oil-fired Turbines with 98.5 mmBtu/hr duct burner13.5 MW Natural Gas/ No. 2 Fuel Oil-fired Turbines with 98.5 mmBtu/hr duct burner13.5 MW Natural Gas/ No. 2 Fuel Oil-fired Turbines with 98.5 mmBtu/hr duct burner200 mmBtu/hour natural gas and No. 2 oil-fired boiler200 mmBtu/hour natural gas and No. 2 oil-fired boiler2 MW Diesel fuel-fired internal combustion engine1.5 MW Diesel fuel-fired internal combustion engine

4 lane truck loading rack with vapor combustion unit.Boiler #1 - 683 mmBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, No. 4 fuel oil, alternative fuels or coal.Boiler #1 - 683 mmBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, No. 4 fuel oil, alternative fuels or coal.Boiler #1 - 683 mmBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, No. 4 fuel oil, alternative fuels or coal.Boiler #1 - 683 mmBtu/hr boiler fired with natural gas, landfill gas, No. 4 fuel oil, alternative fuels or coal.

Page 130: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

solid waste disposal, landfill gas generation and controlsolid waste disposal, landfill gas generation and control300 TPH Portable Hot Mix Asphalt Plant300 TPH Portable Hot Mix Asphalt PlantNumber 5 Flexographic Printing Press with Catalytic IncineratorNumber 5 Flexographic Printing Press with Catalytic Incinerator

Conventional 3-Piece Printing and Overvarnish Coating Line with RTOConventional 3-Piece Printing and Overvarnish Coating Line with RTO

Band Line, controlled by thermal oxidizer (PTI 14-1339)Band Line, controlled by thermal oxidizer (PTI 14-1339)

Band Line, controlled by thermal oxidizer (PTI 14-1652)Band Line, controlled by thermal oxidizer (PTI 14-1652)ammonium nitrate plant

5025 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal fired, dry bottom boiler, with electrostatic precipitator and flue gas desulfurization sc5025 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal fired, dry bottom boiler, with electrostatic precipitator and flue gas desulfurization sc5025 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal fired, dry bottom boiler, with two electrostatic precipitators, low-NOx burners and flu5025 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal fired, dry bottom boiler, with two electrostatic precipitators, low-NOx burners and flu5025 MMBtu/hr pulverized coal fired, dry bottom boiler, with two electrostatic precipitators, low-NOx burners and flu10 Station Rotogravure Printing Press; Co. ID Rotogravure Press No. 10111 station rotogravure printing press with total enclosure and regenerative thermal oxidizer8 Station Rotogravure Printing Press; Co. ID Rotogravure Press No. 6710 Station Rotogravure Printing Press; Co. ID Rotogravure Press No. 10111 station rotogravure printing press with total enclosure and regenerative thermal oxidizer

165 mmBtu per hour natural gas fired low heat release steam generating boiler modification165 mmBtu per hour natural gas fired low heat release steam generating boiler modificationVarnish Kettle Controlled with a Thermal Oxidizer - #9Varnish Kettle Controlled with a Thermal Oxidizer - #7Varnish Kettle Controlled with a Thermal Oxidizer - #6Varnish Kettle Controlled with a Thermal Oxidizer - #3

Four lane gasoline and fuel oil truck loading rack with Zink HEAA2500-825-11-10 Vapor Recovery Unit (VRU) - Modif41 TPH asphalt shingle main production line with Monsanto fabric filter, CVM fabric filters and Flex Kleen fabric filter41 TPH asphalt shingle main production line with Monsanto fabric filter, CVM fabric filters and Flex Kleen fabric filterNo. 1 batch sodium heparin production process with wet scrubber (Tanks T-322, T-203, T-205, T-207, T-208, DissoNo. 1 batch sodium heparin production process with wet scrubber (Tanks T-322, T-203, T-205, T-207, T-208, Disso73.8 TPH asphalt shingle coating line with CECO wet filters and precooler5 bay petroleum products tank truck loading rack with Vapor Recovery and Vapor Control System.67.98 MMBtu natural gas fired turbine used for natural gas compression67.98 MMBtu natural gas fired turbine used for natural gas compression

Page 131: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

67.98 MMBtu natural gas fired turbine used for natural gas compression320 TPH portable asphalt batch plant320 TPH portable asphalt batch plant320 TPH portable asphalt batch plant320 TPH portable asphalt batch plant320 TPH portable asphalt batch plant320 TPH portable asphalt batch plant

Gasoline/Diesel/Ethanol loading rack that loads gasoline cargo tank trucks at a bulk gasoline terminal. The loadiGasoline/Diesel/Ethanol loading rack that loads gasoline cargo tank trucks at a bulk gasoline terminal. The loadi

One Piece Core Production (OPCP) - two 12 ton sand storage bins (PTI 15-01570), Sand transfer from rotary hopper tOne Piece Core Production (OPCP) - two 12 ton sand storage bins (PTI 15-01570), Sand transfer from rotary hopper tEMI CB500 one Piece Core Production using Isocure core making process. The process weight rate for this emission

Ladle metallurgy facility with fabric filterLadle metallurgy facility with fabric filterLadle metallurgy facility with fabric filterLadle metallurgy facility with fabric filterLadle metallurgy facility with fabric filterLadle metallurgy facility with fabric filterLadle metallurgy facility with fabric filter25.3 MMBtu/hr wood waste/natural gas fired boiler with dual multiclones.

(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)(needs to be updated for MACT EEEEE to guidance in E.G. 78)

Page 132: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MLA System modification350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, No. 4 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, No. 4 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, No. 4 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, No. 4 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, No. 4 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)350 TPH Continuous Counterflow Hot Mix Asphalt Plant (natural gas, No. 2 fuel oil, No. 4 fuel oil, on-spec used oil)Loading Rackreplaced by P904Aluminum Wheels Drying OvenAluminum Wheels Drying OvenProduction of compacted salt for water softener regeneration. This emissions unit consists of a flake breaker, conDPA A/O - Petroleum Additives & Rubber Antioxidants - reactors, washers, stills, filter, recovery equipmentBoiler #32 - 220 MMBtu/hr Spreader Stoker Fired Coal BoilerBoiler #32 - 220 MMBtu/hr Spreader Stoker Fired Coal BoilerBoiler #32 - 220 MMBtu/hr Spreader Stoker Fired Coal BoilerBoiler #32 - 220 MMBtu/hr Spreader Stoker Fired Coal BoilerBoiler #32 - 220 MMBtu/hr Spreader Stoker Fired Coal BoilerBoiler #32 - 220 MMBtu/hr Spreader Stoker Fired Coal BoilerBoiler #32 - 220 MMBtu/hr Spreader Stoker Fired Coal BoilerBoiler #32 - 220 MMBtu/hr Spreader Stoker Fired Coal Boiler180 mmBtu/hr waste to energy boiler180 mmBtu/hr waste to energy boiler180 mmBtu/hr waste to energy boiler180 mmBtu/hr waste to energy boiler180 mmBtu/hr waste to energy boiler180 mmBtu/hr waste to energy boiler180 mmBtu/hr waste to energy boiler180 mmBtu/hr waste to energy boilerThe process consists of four tanks used for hard chromium electroplating of industrial rollers. Tank one is divided in

paper coating line, administrative modification to replace thermal oxidizer with a regenerative thermal oxidizer, no i

Page 133: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

EVALUATION D CONTROL EQUPMENT7/24/2007 pulse-jet baghouse7/24/2007 pulse-jet baghouse7/24/2007 pulse-jet baghouse7/24/2007 pulse-jet baghouse7/24/2007 pulse-jet baghouse7/24/2007 pulse-jet baghouse7/25/2007 baghouse7/25/2007 baghouse7/25/2007 baghouse11/29/2007 Wet Scubber11/29/2007 Wet Scubber11/29/2007 Wet Scubber11/29/2007 Wet Scubber11/29/2007 Wet Scubber11/29/2007 Wet Scubber11/29/2007 Wet Scubber11/29/2007 Wet Scubber11/29/2007 Wet Scubber11/29/2007 Wet Scubber1/25/2007 NA1/25/2007 NA1/25/2007 NA1/25/2007 NA1/25/2007 NA1/25/2007 NA1/25/2007 NA6/28/2007 Cyclone6/28/2007 Cyclone6/28/2007 Cyclone6/28/2007 NA6/28/2007 NA6/28/2007 NA6/28/2007 NA6/28/2007 NA6/28/2007 NA3/20/2007 Thermal Oxidizer3/20/2007 Thermal Oxidizer3/20/2007 Termal Oxidizer3/20/2007 Termal Oxidizer3/20/2007 Termal Oxidizer10/18/2007 Baghouse 321610/18/2007 Baghouse 321610/18/2007 Baghouse 321612/7/2007 Baghouse12/7/2007 Baghouse12/7/2007 Baghouse12/11/2007 Baghouse B-310312/11/2007 Baghouse B-310312/11/2007 Baghouse B-310312/19/2007 Thermal Oxidizer12/19/2007 Thermal Oxidizer12/19/2007 Thermal Oxidizer12/19/2007 Thermal Oxidizer

Page 134: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

12/19/2007 Thermal Oxidizer12/19/2007 Thermal Oxidizer12/19/2007 Thermal Oxidizer10/17/2007 catalytic incinerator10/17/2007 catalytic incinerator10/17/2007 catalytic incinerator10/17/2007 catalytic incinerator4/4/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer4/6/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/10/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/13/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer7/18/2007 scrubbers/oxidizer5/30/2007 thermal oxidizer5/30/2007 thermal oxidizer5/30/2007 thermal oxidizer5/30/2007 thermal oxidizer5/30/2007 thermal oxidizer5/30/2007 thermal oxidizer5/30/2007 thermal oxidizer5/31/2007 catalytic incinerator

Page 135: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

5/31/2007 catalytic incinerator5/31/2007 catalytic incinerator5/31/2007 catalytic incinerator5/31/2007 catalytic incinerator5/31/2007 catalytic incinerator6/1/2007 Resin plant thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 Resin plant thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 Resin plant thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 Resin plant thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 Thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 Thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 Thermal oxidizer6/1/2007 Thermal oxidizer10/4/2007 thermal oxidizer10/4/2007 thermal oxidizer10/4/2007 thermal oxidizer5/14/2007 Oxidizer 2(Thermal Incinerator): Flowcoat Line 2 Oxidizer12/5/2007 thermal oxidizer12/5/2007 thermal oxidizer12/5/2007 thermal oxidizer12/5/2007 thermal oxidizer12/5/2007 thermal oxidizer12/5/2007 thermal oxidizer7/17/2007 baghouse2/13/2007 low NOx burner2/13/2007 low NOx burner2/13/2007 Low NOx Burner2/14/2007 NA5/15/2007 low-NOx burners and FGR (flue gas recirculation)5/15/2007 low-NOx burners and FGR (flue gas recirculation)5/15/2007 low-NOx burners and FGR (flue gas recirculation)5/16/2007 flue gas recirc and low-NOx burners5/16/2007 flue gas recirc and low-NOx burners5/16/2007 flue gas recirc and low-NOx burners5/2/2007 PTE5/2/2007 RTO5/2/2007 RTO5/2/2007 PTE5/2/2007 RTO5/2/2007 PTE7/3/2007 PTE and RTO7/3/2007 PTE and RTO7/3/2007 PTE and RTO7/3/2007 PTE7/3/2007 PTE7/3/2007 PTE and RTO10/2/2007 baghouse10/2/2007 baghouse10/2/2007 baghouse

Page 136: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

10/2/2007 baghouse10/2/2007 baghouse10/2/2007 baghouse5/2/2007 wet scrubber1/24/2007 baghouse1/24/2007 baghouse1/24/2007 baghouse1/24/2007 baghouse1/24/2007 rotary filters1/24/2007 rotary filters1/24/2007 rotary filters1/24/2007 rotary filters1/24/2007 rotary filters2/9/2007 rotary filters3/23/2007 Baghouse3/23/2007 Baghouse3/23/2007 Baghouse3/30/2007 Baghouse3/28/2007 SCR and ESP5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber

Page 137: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber5/15/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber7/17/2007 RFO/West Scrubber4/12/2007 Catalytic Incinerator4/12/2007 Catalytic Incinerator3/13/2007 RTO 20-33/13/2007 RTO 20-33/14/2007 RTO 20-1

Page 138: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3/14/2007 RTO 20-13/15/2007 RTO 20-23/15/2007 RTO 20-23/15/2007 RTO 20-23/15/2007 RTO 20-23/15/2007 RTO 20-25/30/2007 RTO 20-15/30/2007 RTO 20-13/27/2007 none3/28/2007 thermal oxidizer11/1/2007 scrubber, ESP, carbon bed9/19/2007 baghouse9/19/2007 baghouse9/19/2007 baghouse9/19/2007 baghouse9/19/2007 baghouse9/19/2007 baghouse3/21/2007 Incinerator3/5/2007 baghouse3/5/2007 baghouse3/5/2007 baghouse3/5/2007 baghouse5/7/2007 baghouse5/7/2007 baghouse12/11/2007 none9/18/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator7/3/2007 baghouse12/27/2007 NSCR12/28/2007 thermal oxidizer, PTE12/28/2007 thermal oxidizer, PTE12/28/2007 thermal oxidizer, PTE12/28/2007 thermal oxidizer, PTE6/19/2007 none for OC/VOC emissions4/10/2007 LEC4/10/2007 LEC4/11/2007 LEC4/11/2007 LEC4/11/2007 LEC4/11/2007 LEC4/13/2007 NSCR4/13/2007 NSCR4/13/2007 LEC4/13/2007 LEC4/14/2007 NSCR4/14/2007 NSCR4/14/2007 NSCR4/14/2007 NSCR4/16/2007 NSCR4/16/2007 NSCR4/17/2007 NSCR4/17/2007 NSCR4/18/2007 NSCR4/18/2007 NSCR4/18/2007 NSCR

Page 139: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

4/18/2007 NSCR4/19/2007 NSCR4/19/2007 NSCR4/19/2007 NSCR4/19/2007 NSCR11/27/2007 NSCR11/27/2007 NSCR11/28/2007 NSCR11/28/2007 NSCR11/29/2007 NSCR11/29/2007 NSCR11/29/2007 NSCR11/30/2007 NSCR11/30/2007 NSCR1/9/2007 none1/9/2007 none1/9/2007 none1/9/2007 none1/9/2007 none1/9/2007 none5/15/2007 afterburner and scrubber5/15/2007 afterburner and scrubber8/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 18/14/2007 RTO No. 19/20/2007 baghouse9/20/2007 baghouse10/9/2007 baghouse10/9/2007 baghouse10/11/2007 baghouse10/11/2007 baghouse11/20/2007 baghouse11/20/2007 baghouse7/10/2007 Fume Incinerator #17/11/2007 Fume Incinerator #22/26/2007 RTO2/26/2007 RTO2/26/2007 RTO2/26/2007 RTO8/30/2007 north baghouse8/30/2007 south baghouse8/30/2007 south baghouse8/30/2007 none3/20/2007 baghouse

Page 140: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3/20/2007 Baghouse`3/20/2007 ESP3/20/2007 ESP7/28/2007 baghouse2/6/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator2/7/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator2/8/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator2/9/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator4/10/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator9/25/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator9/26/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator9/26/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur9/26/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur9/26/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur9/27/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur9/27/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur9/27/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur9/28/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur9/28/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur9/28/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur10/1/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur10/1/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur10/1/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur10/2/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur10/2/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur10/2/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur10/3/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur10/3/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur10/3/2007 BC-CW 2(Adsorber): control efficiency based on manufactur11/15/2007 EC-RTO 1(Thermal Incinerator): control efficiency based o11/15/2007 EC-RTO 1(Thermal Incinerator): control efficiency based o11/13/2007 low NOx burners11/13/2007 low NOx burners11/13/2007 low NOx burners11/13/2007 low NOx burners11/14/2007 Low NOx burners11/14/2007 Low NOx burners4/5/2007 ESP4/5/2007 ESP4/5/2007 ESP4/7/2007 ESP4/7/2007 ESP4/7/2007 ESP8/15/2007 ESP8/15/2007 ESP8/15/2007 ESP8/15/2007 ESP6/25/2007 Water spray8/30/2007 none8/30/2007 core separator and baghouse8/30/2007 none10/12/2007 watering8/15/2007 thermal oxidizer8/15/2007 thermal oxidizer

Page 141: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

9/6/2007 Carbon adsorption7/16/2007 Catalytic Oxidizer7/16/2007 Catalytic Oxidizer7/16/2007 Catalytic Oxidizer9/5/2007 Catalytic Oxidizer7/31/2007 baghouse8/9/2007 ESP8/10/2007 baghouse8/17/2007 baghouse5/9/2007 roxidized5/11/2007 roxidizer4/3/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator4/3/2007 Electrostatic Precipitator8/28/2007 baghouse12/18/2007 catalytic incinerator5/31/2007 impingement scrubber6/20/2007 baghouse6/20/2007 baghouse11/13/2007 ventrui11/13/2007 ventrui11/13/2007 ventrui11/13/2007 ventrui11/13/2007 ventrui11/13/2007 ventrui11/13/2007 scrubber11/13/2007 scrubber11/13/2007 ventrui8/1/2007 wet scrubber/cyclone11/6/2007 catalytic oxidizer11/7/2007 wet scrubber11/7/2007 wet scrubber11/7/2007 wet scrubber11/15/2007 baghouse11/15/2007 baghouse11/15/2007 baghouse11/15/2007 baghouse8/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Wet Collector8/7/2007 Wet Collector8/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Baghouse #18/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Wet Collector8/7/2007 Wet Collector8/7/2007 Wet Collector8/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Wet Collector8/7/2007 Wet Collector

Page 142: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

8/7/2007 Baghouse #28/7/2007 Baghouse #28/8/2007 Baghouse #212/13/2007 New Furnace Baghouse12/13/2007 New Furnace Baghouse12/13/2007 New Furnace Baghouse1/16/2007 tray-type scrubber7/19/2007 tray-type scrubber12/18/2007 Baghouse10/18/2007 Demister10/18/2007 Demister1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/17/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer5/15/2007 thermal oxidizer5/15/2007 thermal oxidizer5/22/2007 Electrostatic Precipiator5/24/2007 none5/24/2007 none5/24/2007 none11/6/2007 none11/7/2007 none4/17/2007 n/a4/17/2007 n/a4/18/2007 N/A4/18/2007 N/A4/18/2007 N/A4/18/2007 N/A4/18/2007 N/A4/18/2007 N/A4/18/2007 N/A4/18/2007 N/A7/19/2007 baghouse3/20/2007 Boiler3/20/2007 flare3/21/2007 Boiler3/21/2007 Boiler3/22/2007 Boiler10/17/2007 baghouse10/17/2007 baghouse10/17/2007 baghouse10/17/2007 baghouse10/17/2007 baghouse10/17/2007 baghouse

Page 143: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

5/10/2007 baghouse, cyclone5/10/2007 baghouse, cyclone3/13/2007 electrostatic precipitator3/13/2007 electrostatic precipitator3/14/2007 electrostatic precipitator3/14/2007 electrostatic precipitator3/14/2007 electrostatic precipitator9/25/2007 scrubber5/14/2007 dust collector5/15/2007 none5/16/2007 none5/17/2007 dust collector7/25/2007 CESS (scrubber and afterburner)7/25/2007 CESS (scrubber and afterburner)7/25/2007 CESS (scrubber and afterburner)7/25/2007 CESS (scrubber and afterburner)7/25/2007 CESS (scrubber and afterburner)7/25/2007 CESS (scrubber and afterburner)7/25/2007 CESS (scrubber and afterburner)8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/8/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none8/14/2007 none

Page 144: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

8/14/2007 none11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse11/6/2007 baghouse12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/4/2007 none3/27/2007 none3/27/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/27/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 electrostatic precipitator and baghouse3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 baghouse3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/28/2007 High Efficiency Air Filter3/29/2007 electrostatic precipitator and baghouse3/30/2007 none

Page 145: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

11/2/2007 none11/27/2007 none11/28/2007 none11/28/2007 none12/4/2007 none12/19/2007 none12/19/2007 none12/19/2007 none12/19/2007 none12/19/2007 none12/19/2007 scrubber12/20/2007 none12/20/2007 none12/20/2007 none12/20/2007 none12/20/2007 scrubber4/25/2007 N/A4/25/2007 N/A4/25/2007 N/A4/25/2007 N/A5/23/2007 baghouse8/1/2007 none8/1/2007 none8/1/2007 none8/1/2007 none8/2/2007 none8/2/2007 none8/2/2007 none8/2/2007 none12/6/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer6/12/2007 baghouse6/12/2007 baghouse6/12/2007 baghouse6/12/2007 baghouse9/5/2007 baghouse9/5/2007 baghouse9/5/2007 baghouse9/5/2007 baghouse9/6/2007 baghouse9/6/2007 baghouse9/6/2007 baghouse9/6/2007 baghouse11/1/2007 baghouse11/1/2007 baghouse11/1/2007 baghouse11/1/2007 baghouse5/8/2007 thermal oxidizer5/8/2007 thermal oxidizer5/8/2007 thermal oxidizer5/8/2007 thermal oxidizer6/20/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer6/20/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer6/21/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer4/10/2007 electrostatic precipitator

Page 146: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

4/10/2007 electrostatic precipitator4/11/2007 none4/12/2007 none4/20/2007 cyclone8/2/2007 electrostatic precipitator8/2/2007 electrostatic precipitator8/2/2007 electrostatic precipitator8/2/2007 electrostatic precipitator5/24/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer5/24/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer2/22/2007 none10/10/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer5/1/2007 none5/2/2007 none5/3/2007 baghouse4/24/2007 baghouse8/16/2007 baghouse8/16/2007 baghouse8/16/2007 baghouse8/16/2007 baghouse10/24/2007 None10/24/2007 None10/24/2007 None10/24/2007 None10/24/2007 None12/20/2007 flare12/20/2007 flare11/15/2007 baghouse11/15/2007 baghouse9/25/2007 cyclone9/25/2007 cyclone5/29/2007 electrostatic precipitator5/29/2007 electrostatic precipitator5/30/2007 electrostatic precipitator12/17/2007 scrubber12/17/2007 scrubber12/17/2007 scrubber12/17/2007 scrubber12/17/2007 scrubber12/17/2007 scrubber12/17/2007 scrubber12/18/2007 scrubber12/18/2007 scrubber12/18/2007 scrubber12/18/2007 scrubber12/18/2007 scrubber12/18/2007 scrubber12/18/2007 scrubber5/30/2007 scrubber5/30/2007 scrubber5/30/2007 scrubber5/30/2007 scrubber1/23/2007 water curtain with filter3/20/2007 baghouse

Page 147: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3/20/2007 baghouse3/20/2007 baghouse5/31/2007 flare8/10/2007 baghouse8/10/2007 baghouse11/2/2007 HCl scrubber4/25/2007 none4/26/2007 none6/20/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer1/9/2007 baghouse1/9/2007 baghouse1/9/2007 baghouse1/9/2007 baghouse1/9/2007 baghouse11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP11/14/2007 RTO, wet scrubber, wet ESP5/22/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer5/22/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer5/22/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer5/22/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer5/22/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer8/23/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer8/23/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer8/23/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer8/23/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer8/23/2007 regenerative thermal oxidizer11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack11/27/2007 baghouse and scrubber to stack8/8/2007 mikro pulse baghouse8/8/2007 fabric filter - hepa

Page 148: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

8/8/2007 fabric filter - hepa8/8/2007 fabric filter - hepa8/8/2007 cyclone air baghouse8/8/2007 mikro pulse baghouse8/8/2007 cyclone air baghouse8/8/2007 mikro pulse baghouse8/8/2007 cyclone air baghouse8/8/2007 mikro pulse baghouse8/8/2007 cyclone air baghouse8/8/2007 mikro pulse baghouse8/8/2007 Y3 Baghouse8/8/2007 Y3 Baghouse8/8/2007 Y3 Baghouse8/8/2007 Y3 Baghouse8/8/2007 Y3 Baghouse8/8/2007 Y3 Baghouse8/8/2007 Y3 Baghouse8/8/2007 Y3 Baghouse8/8/2007 flex Kleen baghouse8/8/2007 flex Kleen baghouse4/4/2007 na4/4/2007 na4/4/2007 na4/4/2007 na4/4/2007 na4/4/2007 na4/4/2007 na7/31/2007 RTO7/31/2007 RTO7/31/2007 RTO6/19/2007 cems6/19/2007 cems6/19/2007 cems11/6/2007 cerms11/7/2007 cems11/7/2007 cems11/7/2007 cems11/8/2007 cems11/8/2007 fuel gas firing rate12/4/2007 cems12/6/2007 cems1/19/2007 cat ox1/19/2007 cat ox1/19/2007 cat ox7/27/2007 cat ox exhaust stack7/27/2007 cat ox exhaust stack7/27/2007 cat ox exhaust stack7/27/2007 cat ox exhaust stack7/27/2007 cat ox exhaust stack7/27/2007 cat ox exhaust stack7/27/2007 cat ox exhaust stack7/27/2007 cat ox6/7/2007 wet spray4/24/2007 cems

Page 149: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

4/24/2007 42 C TECO NOX Analyzer4/24/2007 42 C TECO NOX Analyzer4/24/2007 48 C TECO Analyzer2/17/2007 cems2/17/2007 cems2/17/2007 cems2/17/2007 cems2/17/2007 cems2/17/2007 cems2/20/2007 CEMS2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/21/2007 na2/22/2007 Maxum2/22/2007 Maxum2/23/2007 CEMS2/27/2007 CEMS4/17/2007 eyes4/17/2007 eyes4/17/2007 eyes4/18/2007 eyes4/18/2007 eyes5/8/2007 limas 11 SO25/9/2007 ABB Limas 11 NOX5/30/2007 CEMS6/5/2007 scrubber6/8/2007 scrubber6/9/2007 scrubber6/12/2007 scrubber6/13/2007 scrubber6/27/2007 CEMS9/5/2007 limas 11 NOx9/5/2007 CEMS12/12/2007 CEMS12/12/2007 CEMS12/12/2007 CEMS12/12/2007 CEMS12/12/2007 CEMS8/29/2007 cerms8/30/2007 cerms1/3/2007 single iso train

Page 150: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1/4/2007 ast mobile cems1/4/2007 ast mobile cems1/5/2007 modified method 5.1 train2/20/2007 modified method 5.1 train2/22/2007 ast mobile cems2/22/2007 ast mobile cems2/22/2007 single iso train6/12/2007 water7/24/2007 na1/25/2007 3r technology for nox1/25/2007 3r technology for nox1/31/2007 control equipment?1/31/2007 control equipment?2/28/2007 Thermo Electron analyzer2/28/2007 Thermo Electron analyzer2/28/2007 Thermo Electron analyzer12/13/2007 3 R Nox12/13/2007 3 R Nox12/13/2007 3 R Nox12/13/2007 3 R Nox12/13/2007 3 R Nox8/21/2007 Catalytic Oxidizer8/21/2007 Catalytic Oxidizer8/21/2007 Catalytic Oxidizer8/22/2007 RTO8/23/2007 RTO1/17/2007 RTO1/17/2007 RTO1/17/2007 RTO1/17/2007 RTO10/9/2007 RTO10/9/2007 RTO10/10/2007 RTO10/10/2007 RTO9/7/2007 baghouse9/7/2007 baghouse9/7/2007 baghouse9/7/2007 baghouse9/7/2007 baghouse9/7/2007 baghouse8/15/2007 None2/21/2007 Incinerator2/22/2007 Incinerator5/1/2007 Baghouse5/1/2007 Baghouse5/2/2007 Baghouse5/2/2007 Baghouse5/2/2007 Baghouse5/2/2007 Baghouse5/2/2007 Venturi scrubber5/2/2007 Venturi scrubber5/3/2007 Rotoclone5/3/2007 Rotoclone5/3/2007 Rotoclone

Page 151: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

5/3/2007 Rotoclone12/11/2007 Baghouse12/11/2007 Baghouse12/12/2007 Rotoclone12/12/2007 Rotoclone12/13/2007 Rotoclone12/13/2007 Rotoclone12/13/2007 Rotoclone12/14/2007 Baghouse12/14/2007 Baghouse1/3/2007 RTO1/4/2007 RTO1/4/2007 RTO6/28/2007 None6/28/2007 None6/28/2007 None10/19/2007 RTO10/19/2007 RTO3/27/2007 N/A3/27/2007 N/A3/28/2007 N/A3/28/2007 N/A7/12/2007 N/A7/12/2007 N/A7/12/2007 N/A7/12/2007 N/A7/12/2007 Baghouse7/12/2007 N/A5/24/2007 ESP6/4/2007 ESP6/19/2007 ESP10/10/2007 ESP10/11/2007 ESP2/2/2007 Covers, Moisture4/26/2007 esp10/29/2007 ESP, Scrubber11/14/2007 ESP11/15/2007 ESP, Scrubber12/4/2007 Cyclone, Scrubber4/17/2007 baghouse4/17/2007 baghouse4/17/2007 baghouse7/17/2007 ESP7/18/2007 ESP7/19/2007 ESP7/24/2007 ESP8/7/2007 ESP7/17/2007 Scrubber4/23/2007 N/A4/23/2007 N/A4/24/2007 N/A4/24/2007 N/A4/30/2007 N/A4/30/2007 N/A

Page 152: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

8/16/2007 t.o., carbon bed, rotary conc.8/16/2007 t.o., carbon bed, rotary conc.8/16/2007 t.o., carbon bed, rotary conc.8/16/2007 t.o., carbon bed, rotary conc.8/16/2007 t.o., carbon bed, rotary conc.2/2/2007 Baghouse,Dry Scrubber9/27/2007 N/A3/9/2007 Wet Suppression10/4/2007 Baghouse10/4/2007 Baghouse10/4/2007 Baghouse10/4/2007 Baghouse10/4/2007 Baghouse10/4/2007 Baghouse5/17/2007 Baghouse5/18/2007 Baghouse5/18/2007 Baghouse5/18/2007 N/A6/7/2007 rto6/7/2007 rto6/7/2007 rto3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber3/6/2007 Scrubber2/1/2007 N/A2/1/2007 Low NOx Burners2/1/2007 Low NOx Burners2/1/2007 N/A2/1/2007 N/A2/1/2007 N/A7/10/2007 ESP7/11/2007 ESP7/12/2007 ESP

Page 153: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

4/18/2007 Baghouse4/18/2007 Baghouse4/18/2007 Baghouse4/18/2007 Baghouse4/18/2007 Baghouse4/18/2007 Baghouse4/19/2007 Baghouse4/19/2007 Baghouse4/19/2007 Baghouse4/19/2007 Baghouse4/19/2007 Baghouse4/19/2007 Baghouse5/3/2007 ESP5/8/2007 ESP5/15/2007 ESP6/5/2007 ESP6/6/2007 ESP6/7/2007 ESP6/8/2007 ESP5/14/2007 Pangborn Baghouse5/15/2007 Baghouse A5/16/2007 Baghouse D5/17/2007 Baghouse C5/17/2007 Baghouse5/18/2007 Baghouse B5/18/2007 Baghouse B5/21/2007 Baghouse5/23/2007 Baghouse5/23/2007 Baghouse2/27/2007 dry scrubber2/27/2007 dry scrubber2/27/2007 dry scrubber2/27/2007 dry scrubber2/27/2007 dry scrubber2/27/2007 dry scrubber2/27/2007 dry scrubber2/27/2007 dry scrubber6/8/2007 dry scrubber6/8/2007 dry scrubber6/8/2007 dry scrubber6/8/2007 dry scrubber6/8/2007 dry scrubber6/8/2007 dry scrubber6/8/2007 dry scrubber6/8/2007 dry scrubber10/30/2007 dry scrubber10/30/2007 dry scrubber10/30/2007 dry scrubber10/30/2007 dry scrubber8/27/2007 N/A8/27/2007 N/A8/27/2007 N/A8/27/2007 N/A8/27/2007 N/A

Page 154: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

8/27/2007 Baghouse11/29/2007 urea, low nox burners, packed bed scrubbers11/30/2007 urea, low nox burners, packed bed scrubbers9/20/2007 Baghouse(Primary)9/20/2007 Baghouse(Primary)9/20/2007 Baghouse(Primary)9/21/2007 Baghouse(Secondary)9/21/2007 Baghouse(Secondary)9/21/2007 Baghouse(Secondary)5/17/2007 Water Sprays11/7/2007 Water sprays6/15/2007 Water Sprays3/26/2007 Wet Suppression11/7/2007 Water Sprays9/12/2007 Watering as needed9/12/2007 Watering as needed4/3/2007 Catalytic Incinerator4/3/2007 Catalytic Incinerator4/3/2007 Catalytic Incinerator4/4/2007 Catalytic Incinerator6/5/2007 N/A6/5/2007 N/A5/2/2007 scrubber5/2/2007 baghouse, scrubber12/17/2007 Scrubber7/20/2007 N/A7/20/2007 N/A7/20/2007 Baghouse7/20/2007 N/A7/20/2007 N/A7/20/2007 N/A10/17/2007 ESP8/21/2007 Baghouse8/22/2007 Baghouse8/23/2007 Baghouse8/28/2007 RTO8/28/2007 RTO8/28/2007 RTO8/28/2007 RTO8/28/2007 RTO8/28/2007 RTO8/29/2007 Baghouse8/30/2007 Baghouse6/26/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/26/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/26/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/26/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/26/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/26/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/26/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/27/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/27/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/27/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/27/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP

Page 155: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

6/27/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/27/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP6/27/2007 Scrubber, Wet ESP5/30/2007 none5/30/2007 none5/31/2007 none5/31/2007 none6/11/2007 N/A6/11/2007 N/A6/11/2007 N/A6/11/2007 N/A6/11/2007 N/A10/19/2007 N/A10/23/2007 water sprays4/3/2007 Cyclone10/23/2007 Afterburner, Cyclone1/4/2007 esp10/10/2007 moisture5/4/2007 catalytic oxidizer8/28/2007 Flare8/28/2007 Flare8/28/2007 Flare8/28/2007 Flare8/28/2007 Flare8/28/2007 Flare8/28/2007 Flare8/28/2007 Flare8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/29/2007 Baghouse8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer8/30/2007 Thermal Oxidizer9/19/2007 Carbon Vapor Recovery9/20/2007 Carbon Vapor Recovery5/8/2007 Scrubber, Baghouse

Page 156: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

5/8/2007 Scrubber, Baghouse5/9/2007 Scrubber, Baghouse5/9/2007 Scrubber, Baghouse5/9/2007 Scrubber, Baghouse5/9/2007 Scrubber, Baghouse5/9/2007 Scrubber, Baghouse5/10/2007 Scrubber, Baghouse5/10/2007 Scrubber, Baghouse10/23/2007 N/A10/23/2007 N/A10/23/2007 N/A2/21/2007 ESP8/15/2007 SCR8/15/2007 SCR8/16/2007 SCR8/16/2007 SCR3/15/2007 NA3/15/2007 baghouse10/30/2007 cleaning room (CR) baghouse10/30/2007 cleaning room (CR) baghouse10/30/2007 cleaning room (CR) baghouse10/30/2007 cleaning room (CR) baghouse10/30/2007 cleaning room (CR) baghouse10/30/2007 cleaning room (CR) baghouse11/1/2007 Baghouses (WSSDC)11/1/2007 Baghouses (ESSDC)11/1/2007 west scrubber11/2/2007 Baghouses (EFDC, WDC, CDC)11/2/2007 Baghouses (WDC,CDC)11/2/2007 Baghouses (EFDC)11/2/2007 Baghouses (EFDC,CDC)11/2/2007 Baghouses (WDC)11/2/2007 Baghouses (EFDC)11/2/2007 Baghouses (EFDC, WDC, CDC)10/16/2007 baghouse10/16/2007 baghouse10/16/2007 baghouse10/16/2007 baghouse10/16/2007 baghouses (FMDC, SSDC, EFDC)10/16/2007 baghouse10/16/2007 baghouse10/16/2007 baghouse10/16/2007 baghouse10/16/2007 baghouse10/18/2007 baghouse10/18/2007 baghouse10/18/2007 baghouse10/31/2007 CARBON ADSORBER7/11/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/11/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/11/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/12/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/12/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/12/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER

Page 157: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

7/13/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/13/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/13/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/14/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/14/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER7/14/2007 DRY LOW NOX BURNER1/11/2007 RTO9/25/2007 BAGHOUSE9/25/2007 BAGHOUSE9/25/2007 BAGHOUSE9/27/2007 LOW NOX BURNER9/27/2007 LOW NOX BURNER9/28/2007 LOW NOX BURNER9/28/2007 LOW NOX BURNER10/23/2007 LOW NOX BURNER10/23/2007 BAGHOUSE10/23/2007 BAGHOUSE10/23/2007 LOW NOX BURNER10/24/2007 BAGHOUSE10/24/2007 BAGHOUSE10/24/2007 LOW NOX BURNER10/24/2007 LOW NOX BURNER10/25/2007 BAGHOUSE10/25/2007 BAGHOUSE10/26/2007 BAGHOUSE10/26/2007 BAGHOUSE1/8/2007 BAGHOUSE1/8/2007 BAGHOUSE1/10/2007 BAGHOUSE1/10/2007 BAGHOUSE1/10/2007 BAGHOUSE1/10/2007 BAGHOUSE1/12/2007 BAGHOUSE1/12/2007 BAGHOUSE7/5/2007 BAGHOUSE7/5/2007 BAGHOUSE7/5/2007 BAGHOUSE7/5/2007 BAGHOUSE7/5/2007 BAGHOUSE7/5/2007 BAGHOUSE2/20/2007 THERMAL OXIDIZER2/20/2007 THERMAL OXIDIZER8/14/2007 VAPOR RECOVERY UNIT1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR1/17/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR, FUME CONCENTRATOR7/17/2007 WET SCRUBBER

Page 158: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

2/2/2007 NA2/2/2007 NA2/2/2007 NA5/22/2007 NA5/22/2007 NA5/22/2007 NA7/17/2007 BAGHOUSE7/17/2007 BAGHOUSE7/17/2007 BAGHOUSE12/3/2007 BAGHOUSE12/3/2007 BAGHOUSE12/3/2007 BAGHOUSE12/18/2007 BAGHOUSE12/18/2007 BAGHOUSE12/18/2007 BAGHOUSE6/18/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/19/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/20/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/21/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/21/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/21/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/22/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/22/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/25/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/25/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/25/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/26/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/26/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/29/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR6/29/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR7/12/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR7/13/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR7/13/2007 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER12/11/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER

Page 159: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

10/30/2007 W. W. Sly and Venturi scrubbers in series10/31/2007 baghouse6/28/2007 ESP10/5/2007 multiclone dust collectors11/9/2007 multiclone dust collectors11/30/2007 multiclone dust collectors2/16/2007 low NOx burners2/16/2007 low NOx burners3/27/2007 Scrubber11/21/2007 Packed scrubber and Venturi scrubber, in series11/21/2007 Packed scrubber and Venturi scrubber, in series11/21/2007 Packed scrubber and Venturi scrubber, in series2/13/2007 Scrubber10/2/2007 CAT-OX9/25/2007 Baghouse8/21/2007 baghouse6/4/2007 Baghouse6/4/2007 Baghouse6/4/2007 Baghouse6/4/2007 Baghouse6/4/2007 Baghouse6/5/2007 Baghouse6/5/2007 None6/5/2007 Baghouse6/6/2007 Baghouse6/6/2007 Baghouse6/6/2007 Baghouse6/7/2007 Baghouse6/7/2007 Baghouse12/18/2007 Venturi/Impingement Scrubber5/15/2007 Hood, Baghouse5/17/2007 RACM5/18/2007 RACM5/18/2007 Baghouse5/19/2007 Hood, Baghouse5/20/2007 RACM5/21/2007 RACM6/1/2007 Baghouse7/12/2007 two stage alkaline wet scrubber7/12/2007 two stage alkaline wet scrubber7/12/2007 two stage alkaline wet scrubber7/12/2007 two stage alkaline wet scrubber7/12/2007 two stage alkaline wet scrubber7/12/2007 two stage alkaline wet scrubber7/23/2007 baghouse7/23/2007 baghouse10/2/2007 CAT-OX10/2/2007 CAT-OX10/2/2007 CAT-OX10/2/2007 CAT-OX10/2/2007 CAT-OX9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A

Page 160: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A9/6/2007 N/A2/6/2007 carbon adsorber and thermal oxidizer incinerator2/6/2007 carbon adsorber and thermal oxidizer incinerator2/6/2007 carbon adsorber and thermal oxidizer incinerator11/12/2007 Water8/23/2007 baghouse8/23/2007 baghouse8/23/2007 baghouse8/23/2007 baghouse8/23/2007 baghouse8/23/2007 baghouse3/13/2007 baghouse3/13/2007 baghouse3/13/2007 baghouse3/13/2007 baghouse3/13/2007 baghouse5/30/2007 baghouse5/30/2007 baghouse5/30/2007 baghouse5/30/2007 baghouse5/30/2007 baghouse10/10/2007 BAGHOUSE10/10/2007 BAGHOUSE10/10/2007 BAGHOUSE12/18/2007 THERMAL OXIDIZER6/7/2007 LOW NOX COMBUSTORS6/7/2007 LOW NOX COMBUSTORS6/8/2007 LOW NOX COMBUSTORS6/8/2007 LOW NOX COMBUSTORS6/19/2007 LOW NOX COMBUSTORS6/19/2007 LOW NOX COMBUSTORS6/20/2007 LOW NOX COMBUSTORS6/20/2007 LOW NOX COMBUSTORS4/2/2007 SCRUBBER4/24/2007 BAGHOUSE4/24/2007 BAGHOUSE4/25/2007 BAGHOUSE4/25/2007 BAGHOUSE5/7/2007 SCRUBBER6/14/2007 SETTLING CHAMBER, SCRUBBER6/14/2007 SCRUBBER6/15/2007 SETTLING CHAMBER, SCRUBBER7/11/2007 FUME SCRUBBER9/27/2007 SCRUBBER10/16/2007 MULTICLONE10/16/2007 MULTICLONE

Page 161: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

10/16/2007 MULTICLONE10/17/2007 MULTICLONE10/17/2007 MULTICLONE10/17/2007 MULTICLONE10/18/2007 MULTICLONE; SCRUBBER10/18/2007 MULTICLONE; SCRUBBER10/18/2007 MULTICLONE; SCRUBBER2/20/2007 ESP5/15/2007 ESP5/15/2007 ESP5/16/2007 ESP1/11/2007 ESP12/19/2007 ESP12/7/2007 BLANKET FILTER12/7/2007 BLANKET FILTER1/16/2007 ESP1/17/2007 ESP1/23/2007 LOW NOX BURNERS1/30/2007 ESP10/30/2007 CO CATALYST10/30/2007 CO CATALYST3/27/2007 WATER INJECTION3/27/2007 WATER INJECTION3/28/2007 WATER INJECTION3/28/2007 WATER INJECTION3/20/2007 WATER7/17/2007 LOW NOX BURNERS7/17/2007 LOW NOX BURNERS7/17/2007 LOW NOX BURNERS7/17/2007 LOW NOX BURNERS7/19/2007 ESP, FLUE GAS DESULF (FGD)11/20/2007 ESP, FGD, SCR4/11/2007 ESP4/11/2007 ESP4/19/2007 ESP4/19/2007 ESP5/1/2007 ESP5/2/2007 ESP5/3/2007 ESP5/11/2007 ESP5/16/2007 ESP5/16/2007 ESP5/16/2007 ESP5/24/2007 ESP6/6/2007 ESP6/19/2007 ESP6/20/2007 ESP6/21/2007 ESP12/4/2007 ESP12/5/2007 ESP2/16/2007 DUST COLLECTOR #12/16/2007 DUST COLLECTOR #12/16/2007 DUST COLLECTOR #12/20/2007 DUST COLLECTOR #2

Page 162: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

2/20/2007 DUST COLLECTOR #22/20/2007 DUST COLLECTOR #22/21/2007 COLOR WEIGH DUST COLLECTOR2/21/2007 COLOR WEIGH DUST COLLECTOR2/21/2007 COLOR WEIGH DUST COLLECTOR2/27/2007 BAGHOUSE2/27/2007 BAGHOUSE2/28/2007 NONE4/19/2007 THERMAL OXIDIZER4/19/2007 THERMAL OXIDIZER6/11/2007 VENTURI SCRUBBER6/11/2007 VENTURI SCRUBBER6/11/2007 VENTURI SCRUBBER7/12/2007 BAGHOUSE8/8/2007 BAGHOUSE8/28/2007 NONE8/28/2007 NONE3/6/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER AND WET SCRUBBER3/7/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER AND WET SCRUBBER5/29/2007 ESP6/5/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER AND WET SCRUBBER6/6/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER AND WET SCRUBBER6/26/2007 ESP9/5/2007 ESP9/5/2007 ESP9/5/2007 ESP9/5/2007 ESP9/6/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER AND WET SCRUBBER9/7/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER AND WET SCRUBBER1/29/2007 MULTICLONE1/29/2007 MULTICLONE1/29/2007 MULTICLONE4/11/2007 Prat-Daniel Multi-Clone4/11/2007 Prat-Daniel Multi-Clone1/8/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER7/20/2007 CO CATALYST8/22/2007 CO CATALYST8/23/2007 CO CATALYST8/24/2007 CO CATALYST11/13/2007 NONE11/13/2007 NONE11/14/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER11/14/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER12/19/2007 wet scrubber12/19/2007 wet scrubber12/19/2007 wet scrubber12/19/2007 wet scrubber12/19/2007 wet scrubber12/19/2007 wet scrubber7/25/2007 VCU12/4/2007 ESP12/4/2007 ESP12/4/2007 ESP12/4/2007 ESP

Page 163: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

7/9/2007 FLARE7/9/2007 FLARE7/6/2007 BAGHOUSE7/6/2007 BAGHOUSE4/10/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR6/12/2007 CATALYTIC INCINERATOR11/6/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER11/7/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER11/8/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER11/8/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER1/22/2007 Oxidizer1/22/2007 Oxidizer1/22/2007 Oxidizer1/22/2007 Oxidizer1/22/2007 Oxidizer1/22/2007 Oxidizer11/28/2007 2 packed bed scrubbers3/27/2007 ESP4/24/2007 ESP4/25/2007 ESP5/2/2007 ESP5/3/2007 ESP8/29/2007 ESP2/15/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER2/15/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER10/24/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER10/24/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER10/24/2007 REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER4/12/2007 CATALYTIC OXIDIZER4/17/2007 ESP5/22/2007 LOW NOX BURNERS5/23/2007 control equipment5/23/2007 LOW NOX BURNERS10/25/2007 THERMAL INCINERATOR10/25/2007 THERMAL INCINERATOR10/25/2007 THERMAL INCINERATOR10/25/2007 THERMAL INCINERATOR9/11/2007 NA9/11/2007 NA9/11/2007 NA9/11/2007 NA9/12/2007 NA9/12/2007 NA9/12/2007 NA9/12/2007 NA8/30/2007 VRU6/28/2007 MONSANTO FABRIC FILTER6/28/2007 MONSANTO FABRIC FILTER11/16/2007 scrubber11/16/2007 scrubber3/6/2007 CECO Mist Eliminator5/1/2007 Symex Dry Carbon Adsorption Vapor Recovery Unit3/21/2007 LOW NOX LEAN AIR COMBUSTOR3/21/2007 LOW NOX LEAN AIR COMBUSTOR

Page 164: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3/21/2007 LOW NOX LEAN AIR COMBUSTOR9/20/2007 BAGHOUSE9/20/2007 BAGHOUSE9/20/2007 BAGHOUSE9/20/2007 BAGHOUSE9/20/2007 BAGHOUSE9/20/2007 BAGHOUSE2/6/2007 p009/p017 baghouse2/6/2007 p009/p017 baghouse2/7/2007 settling chamber, baghouse2/7/2007 settling chamber, baghouse4/18/2007 thermal oxidizer8/9/2007 Carbon bed adsorber5/18/2007 BAGHOUSE # D0096/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0036/29/2007 BAGHOUSE D0037/26/2007 BAGHOUSE D0187/26/2007 BAGHOUSE D0187/27/2007 SCRUBBER D0198/10/2007 BAGHOUSE D0219/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0079/20/2007 BAGHOUSE D0076/20/2007 Baghouse6/20/2007 Baghouse6/20/2007 Baghouse6/20/2007 Baghouse12/12/2007 Baghouse12/12/2007 Baghouse12/12/2007 Baghouse7/23/2007 multiclone duct. collectors11/28/2007 SCRUBBER11/28/2007 SCRUBBER11/28/2007 SCRUBBER11/28/2007 SCRUBBER11/28/2007 SCRUBBER

Page 165: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

11/28/2007 SCRUBBER11/28/2007 SCRUBBER11/28/2007 SCRUBBER11/28/2007 SCRUBBER11/28/2007 SCRUBBER11/28/2007 SCRUBBER8/22/2007 fiber bed filter8/1/2007 pressure drop8/1/2007 pressure drop8/1/2007 pressure drop8/1/2007 pressure drop8/1/2007 pressure drop8/1/2007 pressure drop9/12/2007 flare12/21/2007 Baghouse11/7/2007 none11/7/2007 none3/22/2007 2 SCRUBBERS11/13/2007 Carbon Adsorber3/1/2007 esp3/1/2007 esp3/1/2007 esp3/1/2007 esp3/1/2007 esp3/1/2007 esp3/1/2007 esp3/1/2007 esp5/3/2007 ESP5/3/2007 ESP5/3/2007 ESP5/3/2007 ESP5/3/2007 ESP5/3/2007 ESP5/3/2007 ESP6/7/2007 esp3/16/2007 composite mesh-pad system2/14/2007 incinerator2/14/2007 incinerator7/19/2007 carbon absorber2/6/2007 incinerator

Page 166: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

COMPANY PERFORMING TEST MAX RATEAlmega Environmental, Inc. 18 tons per hourAlmega Environmental, Inc. 15 tons per hourAlmega Environmental, Inc. 15 tons per hourAlmega Environmental, Inc. 15 tons per hourAlmega Environmental, Inc. 15 tons per hourAlmega Environmental, Inc. 15 tons per hourAlmega Environmental, Inc. 15 tons per hourAlmega Environmental, Inc. 15 tons per hourAlmega Environmental, Inc. 15 tons per hourCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 95 lbs/hrCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 95 lbs/hrCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 95 lbs/hrCustom Stack Analysis, LLC.Custom Stack Analysis, LLC.Custom Stack Analysis, LLC.Custom Stack Analysis, LLC.Custom Stack Analysis, LLC.Custom Stack Analysis, LLC.Custom Stack Analysis, LLC.Fiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAMACTEC NAMACTEC NAMACTEC NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAFiber-Tech NAIndustrial Air Science NAIndustrial Air Science 750 sets/hrIndustrial Air Science 250 sets/hrIndustrial Air Science 250 sets/hrIndustrial Air Science 250 sets/hrGrace Consulting see memoGrace Consulting see memoGrace Consulting see memoCustom Stack Analysis OperatingCustom Stack Analysis OperatingCustom Stack Analysis OperatingCustom Stack Analysis OperatingCustom Stack Analysis OperatingCustom Stack Analysis OperatingIndustrial Air Science N/AIndustrial Air Science N/AIndustrial Air Science N/AIndustrial Air Science N/A

Page 167: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Industrial Air Science N/AIndustrial Air Science N/AIndustrial Air Science N/AALMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL 13 gallons methanol/minuteALMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL 13 gallons methanol/minuteALMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL 13 gallons methanol/minuteALMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL 13 gallons methanol/minuteTEST, INC 770 lbs/hrTEST, INC 770 lbs/hrShaw Environmental Inc 600 lb/hrShaw Environmental Inc 600 lb/hrShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental Inc 600 lb/hrShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental Inc 600 lb/hrShaw Environmental Inc 600 lb/hrShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental Inc 600 lb/hrShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental Inc 600 lb/hrShaw Environmental Inc 600 lb/hrShaw Environmental Inc 600 lb/hrShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental IncShaw Environmental Inc 770 lbs/hrShaw Environmental Inc 770 lbs/hrShaw Environmental Inc 770 lbs/hrShaw Environmental Inc 770 lbs/hrShaw Environmental Inc 770 lbs/hrShaw Environmental IncIntegrity Air MonitoringIntegrity Air MonitoringIntegrity Air Monitoring 16 gpmIntegrity Air Monitoring 16 gpmIntegrity Air Monitoring 16 gpmIntegrity Air Monitoring 16gpmIntegrity Air MonitoringIntegrity Air Monitoring

Page 168: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Integrity Air Monitoring 20 gallons feed/minuteIntegrity Air Monitoring 20 gallons feed/minuteIntegrity Air Monitoring 20 gallons feed/minuteIntegrity Air Monitoring 20 gallons feed/minuteIntegrity Air MonitoringIntegrity Air Monitoring, Inc 100,000 lbsIntegrity Air Monitoring, Inc 100,000 lbsIntegrity Air Monitoring, IncIntegrity Air Monitoring, IncIntegrity Air Monitoring, IncIntegrity Air Monitoring, Inc 100,000 lbsIntegrity Air Monitoring, Inc 100,000 lbsIntegrity Air Monitoring NAIntegrity Air Monitoring NAIntegrity Air MonitoringIntegrity Air Monitoring NAIntegrity Air Monitoring NAIntegrity Air MonitoringIntegrity Air Monitoring 16 gpmIntegrity Air Monitoring 16 gpmIntegrity Air Monitoring 16 gpm methanol feedCustom Stack Analysis ?Environmental Resources Management max. normal operationsEnvironmental Resources Management max. normal operationsEnvironmental Resources Management max. normal operationsEnvironmental Resources Management max. normal operationsEnvironmental Resources Management max. normal operationsEnvironmental Resources Management max. normal operationsThe Shelly Company 460 TPHTest Inc.Test Inc.Test, Inc. 206 mmBtuTest Inc. 206 mmBtu/hrTEST, Inc. 150 KPPH steam loadTEST, Inc.TEST, Inc.TEST, Inc. 150 klbs/hr steamTEST, Inc.TEST, Inc.Environmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsEnvironmental Quality Management see commentsAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 350 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc.Affiliated Environmental Services, Inc.

Page 169: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Affiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 350 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 350 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 350 TPHAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 275 lbs of waste/hourLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (maximum/nLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (maximum/nLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (maximum/nLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (maximum/nLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (for 6 fiberizLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (for 6 fiberizLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (for 6 fiberizLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (for 6 fiberizLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (for 6 fiberizLEHDER 7500 lb/hr pull rate (for 6 fiberizCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 44,250 lb/hr steam loadCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 44,250 lb/hr steam loadCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 44,250 lb/hr steam loadCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 44,250 lb/hr steam loadGE Energy N/AAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batch

Page 170: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchAir Compliance Testing, Inc. batchKBD Technic NAKBD Technic NAShaw Environmental NAShaw Environmental NAShaw Environmental NA

Page 171: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Shaw Environmental NAShaw Environmental NAShaw Environmental NAShaw Environmental NAShaw Environmental NAShaw Environmental NAShaw Environmental NAShaw Environmental NAAir Compliance Testing 74 MMBtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. N/AGrace Consulting, Inc. N/AAffiliated Environmental Services 300 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services 300 TPHAffiliated Environmental ServicesAffiliated Environmental ServicesAffiliated Environmental Services 300 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services 300 TPHKBD TECGNIC, Inc. 67 units/hrMACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 40,000 lbs/hrMACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 40,000 lbs/hrMACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 40,000 lbs/hrMACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 40,000 lbs/hrMACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 40, 000 lbs/hrMACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 40, 000 lbs/hrEngineering Environmental 4.5 tphGrace Consulting Inc. 2,333 mmBtu/hourCustom Stack Analysis 270 tons/hrCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 370 KWCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 1100 lbs/hr productCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 1100 lbs/hr productCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 226 lbs/hr productCustom Stack Analysis, LLC. 1391.35 lbs/hr resinAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 1,011 lbs VOC input/hr; 8,000 lbClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air Engineering

Page 172: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Clean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air Engineering 100% load +/- 10%Clean Air Engineering 100% load +/- 10%Clean Air Engineering 100% load +/- 10%Clean Air Engineering 100% load +/- 10%Clean Air Engineering 100% load +/- 10%Clean Air Engineering 100% load +/- 10%Clean Air Engineering 100% load +/- 10%Clean Air Engineering 100% load +/- 10%Clean Air Engineering 100% load +/- 10%Air/Compliance Consultants, InAir/Compliance Consultants, InAir/Compliance Consultants, In 41.8 mmBtu/hrAir/Compliance Consultants, InAir/Compliance Consultants, In 41.8 mmBtu/hrAir/Compliance Consultants, InAST Environmental Inc 6.6 tons/hrAST Environmental Inc 6.6 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourAir Compliance Testing 45 lbs VOC employed/hourCustom Stack Analysis 1200-1500 parts per hourCustom Stack Analysis 1200-1500 parts per hourCustom Stack Analysis, LLC 11,500 parts/hourCustom Stack Analysis, LLC 11,500 parts/hourCustom Stack Analysis, LLC 16,000 parts per hourCustom Stack Analysis, LLC 16,000 parts per hourCustom Stack Analysis 787 parts per hourCustom Stack Analysis 787 parts per hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. >50%Air Compliance Testing, Inc. >50%Environmental Quality Management See email to K.Cherney from NMEnvironmental Quality Management See file email to K.Cherney froEnvironmental Quality Management See email to K.Cherney from NMEnvironmental Quality Management See file email to K.Cherney froAir Compliance Testing, Inc max --see fileAir Compliance Testing, Inc max --see fileAir Compliance Testing, Inc max --see fileAir Compliance Testing, Inc max --see fileAir Compliance Testing Cleveland Ohio 9.4 tph coal; 54.5 tph limestone

Page 173: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Air Compliance Testing Cleveland Ohio 9.4 tph coal; 54.5 tph limestoneAir Compliance Testing Cleveland Ohio 9.4 tph coal; 54.5 tph limestoneAir Compliance Testing Cleveland Ohio 9.4 tph coal; 54.5 tph limestoneCustom Stack Analysis 200 tons per hrGrace Consulting, Inc 1325 mmBtu/hrGrace Consulting, Inc 1325 mmBtu/hourGrace Consulting, Inc 1,325 mmBtu/hourGrace Consulting, Inc 2,253 mmBtu/hourGrace Consulting, Inc 6,040 mmBtu/hourGrace Consulting Inc. 1,131 mmBtu/hourGrace Consulting Inc. 6,040 mmBtu/hourShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCShaw Environmental 95% DE or 25 ppm VOCGrace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 225 mmbtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 225 mmbtu/hrGrace Consulting, INc. 40000 lbs/steamGrace Consulting, Inc. 40000 lbs steamGrace Consulting, Inc. 40000 lbs steamGrace Consulting, INc. 40000 lbs/steamGrace Consulting, Inc. 40000 lbs steamGrace Consulting, Inc. 40000 lbs steamGrace ConsultingGrace Consulting 45,000 # of steamGrace Consulting 45,000 # of steamGrace ConsultingLafarge North America 1500000 TPYANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS, INC. 16.4 mmbtu/hrANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS, INC. 16.4 mmbtu/hrANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS, INC. 16.4 mmbtu/hrAir/Compliance Consultants, Inc. 2,740,000 tons/yr of aggregateENVIRONMENTAL SOURCE SAMPLERS 25 fpmENVIRONMENTAL SOURCE SAMPLERS 25 fpm

Page 174: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Marathon Petroleum Company LLC RAD 79260 gal of gas required for tesAir Compliance Consultants, Inc. 150 cpmAir Compliance Consultants, Inc. 150 cpmAir Compliance Consultants, Inc. 150 cpmAir Compliance Consultants, Inc. 150 cpmCustom Stack Analysis 0.01 gr/dscfCustom Stack Analysis 0.02 gr/dscf; 60.1 lbs/hrCustom Stack Analysis 0.01 gr/dscf; 0.0052 gr/dscfCustom Stack Analysis 0.01 gr/dscf; 0.03 lb/tonAir Consulting Services 32 galhrAir Consulting Services 36 gal/hrCatalyst Air Mgmt., Inc. 1227 mmBtu/hourCatalyst Air Mgmt., Inc. 1227 mmBtu/hourCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS 35 tons/hrCustom Stack Analysis 60 sheets/minOptimal Technologies 35 TPHCHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL 300 tphCHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL 300 tphCSACSACSACSACSACSACSA,INC 1350 lb/hr wasteCSA,INC 1350 lb/hr wasteCSACustom Stack Analysis 120 TPHAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 16.02 MM BTU/hr (2370 hp)Air Compliance Testing 18 TPHAir Compliance Testing 18 TPHAir Compliance Testing 18 TPHAir Compliance Testing, Inc. n/aAir Compliance Testing, Inc. n/aAir Compliance Testing, Inc. n/aAir Compliance Testing, Inc. n/aAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rate

Page 175: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. max. melt rateAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 10.8 TPH combinedAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 10.8 TPH combinedAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 10.8 TPH combinedCustom Stack Analysis, LLC 4 tons steel/hrAir Compliance Testing 2158 lbs steel/hrGrace Consulting, Inc. 60 MM BTU/hrDerenzo and Associates, Inc. 250 tons/dayDerenzo and Associates, Inc. 250 tons/dayAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoARI Environmental, Inc. 2687.1 gpmARI Environmental, Inc. 2687.1 gpmARI Environmental, Inc. 602,000 lbs/hrARI Environmental, Inc.ARI Environmental, Inc. 630 mmBTU/hrARI Environmental, Inc.ARI Environmental 18.2 MMBtu/hrARI Environmental, Inc. 22.6 MMBtu/hrGrace Consulting, Inc. n/aGrace Consulting, Inc. n/aGrace Consulting, Inc. 156.3 mmBTU/hrGrace Consulting, Inc. 156.3 mmBTU/hrGrace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc. 156.3 mmBTU/hrGrace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc. 156.3 mmBTU/hrGrace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc. 67.4 mmBTU/hrARI Environmental, Inc. ConfidentialARI Environmental, Inc. N/AARI Environmental, Inc. ConfidentialARI Environmental, Inc. ConfidentialARI Environmental, Inc. ConfidentialAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc.Affiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 165 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 165 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc.Affiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 165 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 165 TPH

Page 176: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 3 TPHAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 3 TPHBlue Mountain Environmental Management CorporationBlue Mountain Environmental Management CorporationBlue Mountain Environmental Management CorporationBlue Mountain Environmental Management Corporation 128 mmBTU/hrBlue Mountain Environmental Management CorporationAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 160 tons/hrBT Environmental Consulting, Inc 215 molds/hrBT Environmental Consulting, Inc 40 tons/hrBT Environmental Consulting, Inc 215 molds/hrBT Environmental Consulting, Inc 235 molds/hrBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 75 TPHBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 75 TPHBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 75 TPHBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 75 TPHBT Environmental Consulting, Inc.BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 75 TPHNTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd. see belowNTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd. 261 molds/hrNTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd. 254 molds/hr

Page 177: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd.NTH Consultants, Ltd. 205 molds/hrNTH Consultants, LTD. 254 molds/hrNTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.NTH Consultants, LTD.Grace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc.Grace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc. confidentialGrace Consulting, Inc. confidential

Page 178: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. confidentialEl Paso Pipeline GroupEl Paso Pipeline GroupEl Paso Pipeline GroupEl Paso Pipeline GroupAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 400 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 113 mmBTU/hrAir ComplianceTesting, Inc. not applicableAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 60 mmBTU/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 60 mmBTU/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 8200 lbs/hr (based on daily aveAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see belowAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see belowAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see belowAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see belowAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 10613.8 lineal feet/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 10613.8 lineal feet/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 10533.6 lineal feet/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 10533.6 lineal feet/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 12095.2 pieces/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 12095.2 pieces/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 18134.2 lineal feet/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 18134.2 lineal feet/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. see memoAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 8344 lineal feet/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 8344 lineal feet/hrAlmega Environmental, Inc. 9.2 gallons adhesion promoter/hAlmega Environmental, Inc. 9.2 gallons adhesion promoter/hAlmega Environmental, Inc. 9.2 gallons adhesion promoter/hAlmega Environmental, Inc. 9.2 gallons adhesion promoter/hAir Compliance Consultants, Inc. 372.8 lbs VOC/hrAir Compliance Consultants, Inc. 372.8 lbs VOC/hrAir Compliance Consultants, Inc. 50.56 lbs VOC/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 98.4 MMBtu/hr

Page 179: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 98.4 MMBtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 114 MMBtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 114 MMBtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 2000 lbs/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 98.4 MMBtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 98.4 MMBtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 98.4 MMBtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 98.4 MMBtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 48.4 lbs VOC/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 48.4 lbs VOC/hrAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 1.5 tons/hrAir Compliance Consultants, Inc. 221.8 lbs/hr (6 month average raAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 17,787 lbs/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 17,787 lbs/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 50,000 lbs/hrAST Environmental, Inc. 70 tons/hrEnvironmental Quality Management, Inc.Environmental Quality Management, Inc. 70 tons/hrEnvironmental Quality Management, Inc. 70 tons/hrEnvironmental Quality Management, Inc.Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 96,000 lbs/hr with 480 lbs/hr silPace Analytical Services, Inc. 96,000 lbs/hr with 480 lbs/hr silPace Analytical Services, Inc.Pace Analytical Services, Inc.Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 112 MMBtu/hrAir Quality Specialist, Inc. not applicableAir Quality Specialist, Inc. not applicableCustom Stack Analysis, LLC 600 lbs/hrCustom Stack Analysis, LLC 600 lbs/hrGrace Consulting, Inc. 105 tons/hrGrace Consulting, Inc. 105 tons/hrGrace Consulting, Inc. 133 MMBtu/hrGrace Consulting, Inc. 133 MMBtu/hrGrace Consulting, Inc. 133 MMBtu/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 37 tons/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 319.6 gpmAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 319.6 gpmAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 319.6 gpmAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 319.6 gpmAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 75 gallons glaze/hrStack Test Group, Inc. 69.4 mmBTU/hr

Page 180: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Stack Test Group, Inc. 69.4 mmBTU/hrStack Test Group, Inc. 69.4 mmBTU/hrBT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Not applicableThe Shelly Company 300 TPHThe Shelly Company 300 TPHAmbient Air Services, Inc. 32.5 TPHO'Brien and Gere 161.3 lbs rubber/batchO'Brien and Gere 33.13 lbs rubber/batchAffiliated Environmental Services, Inc. 109.6 lbs VOC/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 24.0 TPHAir Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 24.0 TPHAir Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 24.0 TPHGSA, Inc. 30.0 TPHGSA, Inc.GSA, Inc. 30.0 TPHGSA, Inc. 30.0 TPHGSA, Inc.GSA, Inc.GSA, Inc.GSA, Inc. 30.0 TPHGSA, Inc. 30.0 TPHGSA, Inc. 30.0 TPHAir Compliance Testing, Inc. low load testingAir Compliance Testing, Inc. low load testingAir Compliance Testing, Inc. low load testingAir Compliance Testing, Inc. low load testingAir Compliance Testing, Inc. low load testingAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 19.6 lbs/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 19.6 lbs/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 9.8 lbs/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 22.8 lbs/hrAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 22.8 lbs/hrBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC IcBTEC IcBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC IcBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC IcBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedBTEC Ic 11.5 tons/hr combinedTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 6.5 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 6.5 tons/hr

Page 181: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

TRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 5.6 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 8.0 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 8.0 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 8.0 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 8.0 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 8.0 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 8.0 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 8.0 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 8.0 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 6.5 tons/hrTRIGON ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 6.5 tons/hrAirtech EnvironmentalAirtech Environmental 75 tons/dayAirtech Environmental 75 tons/dayAirtech EnvironmentalAirtech Environmental 75 tons/dayAirtech Environmental 75 tons/dayAirtech Environmental 75 tons/dayAir Compliance Testing 11,375 lbs/hrAir Compliance Testing 11,375 lbs/hrAir Compliance Testing 11,375 lbs/hrARI 43 mmBTU/hrARI 68 mmBTU/hrARI 250 mmBtu/hrARI 118.5 MSCFH feed ratesARI 37.96 mmbtu/hrARIARIARI 97 mmBTU/hrARI 53 mmBtu/hrARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. naARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. naAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxAir Compliance Testing maxWillcrest, Inc 250 tons per hrGrace Consulting company 1736 MMBtu/hr

Page 182: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Grace Consulting companyGrace Consulting companyGrace Consulting company 1736 MMBtu/hrARI ENVIRONMENTAL INC naARI ENVIRONMENTAL INC naARI ENVIRONMENTAL INC naARI ENVIRONMENTAL INC naARI ENVIRONMENTAL INC naARI ENVIRONMENTAL INC naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI naARI 250 K lb/hrARI 250,000 lb/hr steam (highest)ARI naARI 22,000 barrells/dayARI 22,000 barrells/dayARI 22,000 barrells/dayARI 22,000 barrells/dayARI 22,000 barrells/dayARI naARI 160-225 K lb/hrARI naARI naARI naARI naARIARIRandy Martin 620 tons 100% acid/dayRandy Martin 380 tons 100% acid/dayAST ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 514 mmBtu/hr

Page 183: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

AST ENVIRONMENTAL INC.AST ENVIRONMENTAL INC.AST ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 514 mmBtu/hrAST ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 514 mmBtu/hrAST ENVIRONMENTAL INC.AST ENVIRONMENTAL INC.AST ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 514 mmBtu/hrmine services co 10-15% opacityDorenzo & Associates, Inc naPlatt Environmental 29.8 tons draw/hrPlatt Environmental 29.8 tons draw/hrPlatt Environmental 23.8 tons/hrPlatt Environmental 23.8 tons/hrPlatt EnvironmentalPlatt EnvironmentalPlatt Environmental 29.8 tons draw/hrPlatt Environmental 29.8 tons draw/hrPlatt Environmental 29.8 tons draw/hrPlatt Environmental 29.8 tons draw/hrPlatt Environmental 29.8 tons draw/hrPlatt Environmental 29.8 tons draw/hrKBD Technic 5000 SCFMKBD Technic 5000 SCFMKBD Technic 2000 SCFMKBD Technic 5000 SCFMKBD Technic 7000 SCFMWeston Solutions 775 lbs material per dayWeston Solutions 775 lbs material per dayWeston Solutions 775 lbs material per dayWeston Solutions 775 lbs material per dayKBD Technic 41.7 lb/hrKBD Technic 41.7 lb/hKBD Technic 41.7 lb/hKBD Technic 41.7 lb/hIndustrial Air Science 125 TPHIndustrial Air Science 125 TPHIndustrial Air ScienceIndustrial Air ScienceIndustrial Air Science 125 TPHIndustrial Air Science 125 TPHKBD Technic N/AKBD Technic 120 carriers/hrKBD Technic 120 carriers /hrARI Environmental 600 lb/hrARI Environmental 600 lb/hrARI Environmental 2000 lb/hrARI Environmental 2000 lb/hrARI Environmental 2000 lb/hrARI Environmental 2000 lb/hrARI Environmental 4000 lb/hrARI Environmental 4000 lb/hrARI Environmental 4000 lb/hrARI Environmental 4000 lb/hrARI Environmental 4000 lb/hr

Page 184: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

ARI Environmental 4000 lb/hrARI Environmental 600 lb/hrARI Environmental 600 lb/hrARI Environmental 4000 lb/hrARI Environmental 4000 lb/hrARI Environmental 4000 lb/hrARI Environmental 4000 lb/hrARI Environmental 820 lb/hrARI Environmental 700 lb/hrARI Environmental 820 lb/hrKBD Technic 120 liters/hrKBD TechnicKBD TechnicIndustrial Air Science 370 lb/hrIndustrial Air Science 370 lb/hrIndustrial Air Science 370 lb/hrShaw Environmental & Infrastructure Inc. 93.1 lbs/hrShaw Environmental & Infrastructure Inc. 160.0 lbs/hrTennessee GasTennessee GasTennessee GasTennessee GasChief Environmental Group 200 TPHChief Environmental GroupChief Environmental GroupChief Environmental Group 200 TPHChief Environmental Group 200 TPHChief Environmental Group 200 TPHGrace Consulting, Inc. 490,000 lb/hr steam flowGrace Consulting 490,000 pounds/hour steam floGrace Consulting 490,000 pounds/hour steam floGrace Consulting, Inc 167 MWGrace Consulting Inc. 167 MWConesville Plant Personnel 600 tons per hourGE ENERGY SERVICES 820 mw grossPlatt Environmental Services 425 MWPlatt Environmental Services 175 GMW(nominal)Platt Environmental Services Approx. 400 MWAir Compliance Testing 644 million Btu/hourAir Compliance Testing 85 ton/hourAir Compliance Testing 6.0 ton/hourAir Compliance Testing 100 ton/hourPlatt Environmental Services 217 MWPlatt Environmental Services 217 MWPlatt Environmental Services 217 MWPlatt Environmental Services 217 MWPlatt Environmental Services 217 MWTest, Inc. 50 TPHClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringClean Air EngineeringStork Southweatern LaboratoriesStork Southweatern Laboratories

Page 185: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

AIR COMPLIANCE TESTING 62.7 gal/hrAIR COMPLIANCE TESTING 62.7 gal/hrAIR COMPLIANCE TESTING 62.7 gal/hrAIR COMPLIANCE TESTING 62.7 gal/hrAIR COMPLIANCE TESTING 62.7 gal/hrAir Compliance Testing 80 tons/dayCustom Stack Analysis 6.05 tons/hourCustom Stack Analysis 300 TPHChief Environmental Group 250 tons/hourChief Environmental Group 250 tons/hourChief Environmental Group 250 tons/hourChief Environmental GroupChief Environmental GroupChief Environmental Group 250 tons/hourCustom Stack Analysis 13 TPHCustom Stack Analysis 13 TPHCustom Stack Analysis 13 TPHCustom Stack Analysis 13 TPHALMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 37 gal/hrALMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 37 gal/hrALMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 37 gal/hrTest, Inc.Test, Inc.Test, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc.Test, Inc.Test, Inc.Test, Inc.Test, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc.Test, Inc.Test, Inc.Test, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc.Test, Inc.Test, Inc.Test, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverTest, Inc. 11,500 oz gold, 15,000 oz silverPlatt Environmental Services 652 million Btu/hourPlatt Environmental ServicesPlatt Environmental ServicesPlatt Environmental Services 652 million Btu/hourPlatt Environmental Services 652 million Btu/hourPlatt Environmental Services 652 million Btu/hourPlatt Environmental Approximately 600 MWPlatt Environmental Approximately 600 MWPlatt Environmental Approximately 600 MW

Page 186: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Clean Air EngineeringClean Air Engineering 191 tons/hourClean Air EngineeringClean Air Engineering 191 tons/hourClean Air Engineering 191 tons/hourClean Air Engineering 191 tons/hourClean Air EngineeringClean Air Engineering 191 tons/hourClean Air EngineeringClean Air Engineering 191 tons/hourClean Air Engineering 191 tons/hourClean Air Engineering 191 tons/hourGrace Consulting, Inc 350 Gross MegawattsGrace Consulting Incorporated 700 MWGGrace Consulting, Inc 700 Gross MegawattsGrace Consulting Incorporated 215 MWGGrace Consulting, Inc 215 Gross MegawattsGrace Consulting, Inc 215 Gross MegawattsGrace Consulting Incorporated 215 MWGOptimal Technologies Incorporated 6.6 TPHOptimal Technologies Incorporated 3 TPHOptimal Technologies Incorporated 3.0 TPHOptimal Technologies Incorporated 2.0 TPHOptimal Technologies Incorporated 10 TPHOptimal Technologies Incorporated 2.5 TPHOptimal Technologies Incorporated 2.0 TPHOptimal Technologies Incorporated 7.4 TPHOptimal Technologies Incorporated 1.5 TPHOptimal Technologies Incorporated 1.5 TPHMACTEC 274,000 lb al/dayMACTEC 274,000 lb al/dayMACTEC 274,000 lb al/dayMACTEC 274,000 lb al/dayMACTEC 274,000 lb al/dayMACTEC 274,000 lb al/dayMACTEC 274,000 lb al/dayMACTEC 274,000 lb al/dayMACTEC 5.5 tons AL/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons AL/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons AL/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons AL/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons AL/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons AL/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons AL/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons AL/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons al/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons al/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons al/hourMACTEC 5.5 tons al/hourChief Environmental Group 400 TPHChief Environmental Group 400 TPHChief Environmental GroupChief Environmental GroupChief Environmental Group 400 TPH

Page 187: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Chief Environmental Group 400 TPHShaw ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 45 tons/hourShaw ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 45 tons/hourAir Compliance Testing 240 pounds MBTT/dayAir Compliance Testing 240 pounds MBTT/dayAir Compliance Testing 240 pounds MBTT/dayAir Compliance Testing 240 pounds MBTT/dayAir Compliance Testing 240 pounds MBTT/dayAir Compliance Testing 240 pounds MBTT/dayAir Compliance Testing 200 TPHAir Compliance Consultants 350 tons/hourAir Compliance Consultants 650 TPHAir Compliance Consultants 200 TPHAir Compliance Consultants 450 tons/hourAir Compliance Testing 55 TPHAir Compliance Testing 400 TPHEnvironmental Source Samplers 439,425 sq. ft per hourEnvironmental Source Samplers 439,425 sq. ft per hourEnvironmental Source Samplers 439,425 sq. ft per hourEnvironmental Source Samplers 5 gal/hour??Custom Stack Analysis 2600 SCFMCustom Stack Analysis 2600 SCFMAir Compliance Testing 4,000 pounds/hourAir Compliance Testing 4,000 pounds/hourCustom Stack Analysis 80 tons/hourThe Shelly Company 300 ton/hourThe Shelly Company 300 tons/hourThe Shelly Company 300 ton/hourThe Shelly CompanyThe Shelly CompanyThe Shelly Company 300 tons/hourConestoga-Rovers and Associates 158 million Btu/hourAnalytical Testing Consultants 56,000 cfmAnalytical Testing Consultants 10,520 cfmAnalytical Testing Consultants 72,000 cfmAnalytical Testing Consultants aproximatley 88 gal/hrAnalytical Testing Consultants aproximatley 88 gal/hrAnalytical Testing Consultants aproximatley 88 gal/hrAnalytical Testing Consultants aproximatley 88 gal/hrAnalytical Testing Consultants aproximatley 88 gal/hrAnalytical Testing Consultants aproximatley 88 gal/hrAnalytical Testing Consultants 50,000 cfmAnalytical Testing Consultants 72,000 cfmPrecision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hourPrecision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hourPrecision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hourPrecision Emissions IncorporatedPrecision Emissions IncorporatedPrecision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hourPrecision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hourPrecision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hourPrecision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hourPrecision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hourPrecision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hour

Page 188: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Precision Emissions Incorporated 539 million Btu/hourPrecision Emissions IncorporatedPrecision Emissions IncorporatedCustom Stack Analysis LLC 5.32 TPH (each kiln)Custom Stack Analysis LLC 5.32 TPH (each kiln)Custom Stack Analysis LLC 2.91 tons per hour (P101) and 3Custom Stack Analysis LLC 2.91 tons per hour (P101) and 3Custom Stack Analysis 37 TPH(1.85 per kiln)Custom Stack AnalysisCustom Stack Analysis 37 TPH(1.85 per kiln)Custom Stack Analysis 37 TPH(1.85 per kiln)Custom Stack AnalysisMine Services Company 1 ton per hourCustom Stack Analysis 400 ton/hourAST Environmental Inc. 18 million Btu/hourEmissions and Source Testing Company 18 million Btu/million Btu heat inPlatt Environmental Services 205 mw netMARIETTA INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES 50 tphSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 35,000 pounds/hourAlmega Environmental Inc. ConfidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. ConfidentialAlmega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc. ConfidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. ConfidentialAlmega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc.Almega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. confidentialAlmega Environmental Inc. confidentialJordan Technologies 300,000 gal/6 hr periodJordan Technologies 300,000 gal/6 hr periodEnvironmental Quality Management 18 Megawatts

Page 189: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Environmental Quality Management 18 MegawattsEnvironmental Quality Management 31 MegawattsEnvironmental Quality Management 31 MegawattsEnvironmental Quality Management 31 MegawattsEnvironmental Quality Management 22 MegawattsEnvironmental Quality Management 22 MegawattsEnvironmental Quality Management 31 MegawattsEnvironmental Quality Management 25 MegawattsAir Compliance Testing 50,000 scfhAir Compliance TestingAir Compliance TestingPlatt Environmental Services, Inc 5649 mmbtu/hrGrace Consulting Inc. 172 MWGrace Consulting Inc. 172 MWGrace Consulting Inc. 172 MWGrace Consulting Inc. 172 MWENSR Consulting & Engineering 192 MMBtu/hrENSR Consulting & Engineering 0.616 lb/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 38 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 38 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 38 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 38 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 38 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 38 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 17 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 36 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 25 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 110 T/hr (WDC), 52 T/hr (CDC),Custom Stack Analysis LLC 110 t/hr (WDC), 52 T/hr (CDC)Custom Stack Analysis LLC 20 t/hr metal poured (Disa 1 & DCustom Stack Analysis LLC 24.37 t/hr metal poured (holdingCustom Stack Analysis LLC 110 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 36 t/hrCustom Stack Analysis LLC 110 T/hr (WDC), 52 T/hr (CDC),Custom Stack Analysis LLC 122 t/hr (all sources vented toCustom Stack Analysis LLC 122 t/hr (all sources vented toCustom Stack Analysis LLC 122 t/hr (all sources vented toCustom Stack Analysis LLC 122 t/hr (all sources vented toCustom Stack Analysis LLC see memo belowCustom Stack Analysis LLC see memo belowCustom Stack Analysis LLC see memo belowCustom Stack Analysis LLC see memo belowCustom Stack Analysis LLC see memo belowCustom Stack Analysis LLC see memo belowCustom Stack Analysis LLC see memo belowCustom Stack Analysis LLC see memo belowCustom Stack Analysis LLC see memo belowINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 11 ML/PART AND 571 PARTSGE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTGE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTGE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

Page 190: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTGE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.GE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTGE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.Air Compliance Testing unknownBLUE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CO SEE COMMENTSBLUE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CO SEE COMMENTSBLUE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CO SEE COMMENTSBLUE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONBLUE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONBLUE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONBLUE MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONMiSun ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NOT APPLICABLEMi SUN, LLC.Mi SUN, LLC.MiSun ENVIRONMENTAL SERIVCES 175 TONS / HR FEED TO KILNMi SUN, LLC.Mi SUN, LLC.MiSun ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NOT APPLICABLEMiSun ENVIRONMENTAL SERIVCES 175 TONS / HR FEED TO KILNMi SUN, LLC.Mi SUN, LLC.Mi SUN, LLC.Mi SUN, LLC.SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 169 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 169 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.INDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 400 TPHINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 400 TPHINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 400 TPHINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCEINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCEINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 400 TPHAIR COMPLIANCE TESTING, INC. 100 FT COATED / MINUTEAIR COMPLIANCE TESTING, INC. 100 FT COATED / MINUTEJORDAN SERVICE COMPANY, INC. 139,726 GAL / 6 HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 184 LB VOC APPLIED / HOURENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 560000 LB/HR CORN THROU

Page 191: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

FBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 72 MMBTU/HRFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 72 MMBTU/HRFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESIndustrial Air Science 350 TPHIndustrial Air ScienceIndustrial Air ScienceMACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. 150 MMBTU/HR; 120,000LB SMACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. 120,000 LB STEAM /HOUR; 1ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 696 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 703 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 701 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 701 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 701 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 727 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 727 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 727 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 720 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 696 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 696 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 720 MMBTU/HR ACTUAL HEATENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 720 MMBTU/HR ACTUAL HEATENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 703 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 703 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUTENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 736 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 736 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC. 736 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ALL UNITS OPERATING

Page 192: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

E. Roberts Alley & Associates 200,000 lbs/siloE. Roberts Alley & Associates 200,000 lbs/siloGrace Consulting Inc. noneGrace Consulting Inc n/aGrace Consulting Inc n/aGrace Consulting Inc n/aAir Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 735 lbs/hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 1050 lbs/hour (P001 and P002 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 1050 lbs/hour (P001 and P002 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 1050 lbs/hour (P001 and P002 Air Compliance N/AAir Compliance Testing 250 gals/hrConestoga-Rovers & Associates 30.1 tons iron/hour (theoretical)Air Compliance Testing Inc 3000 lbs/hrAir Ambient Services Inc. 75.0 TPHAir Ambient Services Inc. 75.0 TPHAir Ambient Services Inc. 75.0 TPHAir Ambient Services Inc. 75.0 TPHAir Ambient Services Inc. 75.0 TPHAir Ambient Services Inc. 75.0 TPHAir Ambient Services Inc. 75.0 TPHAir Ambient Services Inc. 75.0 TPHAir Ambient Services Inc.Air Ambient Services Inc.Air Ambient Services Inc. 75.0 TPHAir Ambient Services Inc.Air Ambient Services Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 3.6 dry sludge tons per hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 255 tons/hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 255 tons/hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 255 tons/hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 45 tons shale/hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 255 tons/hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 255 tons/hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 255 tons/hourAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 45 tons shale/hour to KilnAir Compliance Testing, Inc. ConfidentialAir Compliance Testing, Inc. ConfidentialAir Compliance Testing, Inc. ConfidentialAir Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc.Air Compliance Testing, Inc. ConfidentialENVISAGE ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 40,000 lbs/chargeENVISAGE ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 40,000 lbs/chargeAir Compliance Testing 2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pcAir Compliance Testing 2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pcAir Compliance Testing 2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pcAir Compliance Testing 2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pcAir Compliance Testing 2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pcCK Environmental 950 KWCK EnvironmentalCK Environmental 950 KW

Page 193: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CK EnvironmentalCK Environmental 950 KWCK Environmental 950 KWCK EnvironmentalCK Environmental 950 KWCK EnvironmentalCK Environmental 950 KWCK Environmental 950 KWCK Environmental 950 KWAlmega Environmental, Inc. n/aAlmega Environmental, Inc. n/aAlmega Environmental, Inc. n/aAir Compliance Testing, Inc. 200 TPHIndustrial Air ScienceIndustrial Air Science 150tphtphIndustrial Air ScienceIndustrial Air Science 150tphtphIndustrial Air Science 150tphtphIndustrial Air Science 150tphtphFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTALFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL 180,000 lb/hr steam 238mmbtuFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL 180,000 lb/hr steam 238mmbtuFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTALFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL 180,000 lb/hr steam 238mmbtuFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL 180,000 lb/hr steam 238mmbtu/FBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL 180,000 lb/hr steam 238mmbtuFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL 180,000 lb/hr steam 238mmbtuFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTALFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTALFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 180,000 lb/hr steamFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESFBT TESTING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESKBD TECHNIC INC 10000 SCFMGRACE CONSULTING 80 MWGRACE CONSULTING 80 MWGRACE CONSULTING 80 MWGRACE CONSULTING 80 MWGRACE CONSULTING 80 MWGRACE CONSULTING 80 MWGRACE CONSULTING 80 MWGRACE CONSULTING 80 MWSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 225 TONS/HEAT (4 HEATS/RUENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC 2 HEATS/RUN, 450 TONS PERENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC 2 HEATS/RUN, 450 TONS PERENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC 2 HEATS/RUN, 450 TONS PERENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC 2 HEATS/RUN, 450 TONS PERSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 225 TONS/HEAT (4 HEATS/RUSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 310 TONS/HRENVIRONMENTAL QULATIY MANAGEMENT INC. 225 TONS/HEAT (4 HEATS/RUSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 310 TONS/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC 625 TPHSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE INC 225 TONS/HEAT (4 HEATS/RUENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 15 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 15 MMBTU/HR

Page 194: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 15 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 17.8 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 17.8 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 17.8 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 13.7 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 13.7 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 13.7 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 340 KPPHENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 192,800 LB/HR STEAM, 249 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 192,800 LB/HR STEAM, 249 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 192,800 LB/HR STEAM, 249 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INC. 25 MWGRACE CONSULTING, INC MWMACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING 6.0 FT/MIN CONVEYER SPEEMACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING 6.0 FT/MIN CONVEYER SPEEEQM 95 MMBTU/hrEQM 95 MMBTU/hrEQM 132 mmbtu/hrEQM 95 MMBTH/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 5.7 MWENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 5.7 MWGRACE CONSULTING INCGRACE CONSULTING INCGRACE CONSULTING INCGRACE CONSULTING INCSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 400 TPHGRACE CONSULTING, INC.GRACE CONSULTING, INC.GRACE CONSULTING, INC.GRACE CONSULTING, INC.GRACE CONSULTING 1426 MWGRACE 11,968 MMBTU/HR ;1426 MWUNITED SCIENCES TESTING 240 MMBTU/HRUNITED SCIENCES TESTING 425 MMBTU/HRGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 240 MMBTU/HRUNITED SCIENCES TESTING 240 MMBTU/HRGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 240 MMBTU/HRGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 240 MMBTU/HRGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 434 MMBTU/HRGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 100 MWUNITED SCIENCES TESTING 100 MWUNITED SCIENCES TESTING 434 MWGRACE CONSULTING 162 MWGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 100 MWGRACE CONSULTING 100 MW (999 MMBTU/HR)UNITED SCIENCES TESTING 100 MWUNITED SCIENCES TESTING 125 MWGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 143 MWGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 100 mw (971 mmbtu/hr)GRACE CONSULTING, INC. 135 MW OR 1215 MMBTU/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 25000 LB/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 10000 LB/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 10000 LB/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 25000 LB/HR

Page 195: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 10000 LB/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 10000 LB/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 2350 LB ADDEDSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 2350 LB ADDEDSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 2350 LB ADDEDSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 155 MMBTU/HR; 120 KPPH SSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 155 MMBTU/HR; 120 KPPH SSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 16000 LB THROUGHPUTSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 9992 LB/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 9992 LB/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 25000 LB/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 10000 LB/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 10000 LB/HRSPECTRUM SYSTEMS INC 155 MMBTU/HR; 120 KPPH SSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 120 KPPH STEAMSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 116 MMBTU/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 116 MMBTU/HRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 2750 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEESHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 2750 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEESHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 500 KPPH STEAM; 683 MMBTSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 2750 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEESHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 2750 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEECONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES 500 KPPH STEAM; 683 MMBTShaw Environmental Inc. 500 KPPH STEAM; 683 MMBTShaw Environmental Inc.Shaw Environmental Inc.Shaw Environmental Inc. 500 KPPH STEAM; 683 MMBTSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 2750 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEESHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 2750 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEESHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 90 MMBTU/HR (75 KPPH STEAStack Test Group Inc. 40 mmbtu/hrStack Test Group Inc. 40 mmbtu/hrRMC Environmental 1.5 MWRMC ENVIRONMENTAL 132.1 MMBTU/HRRMC ENVIRONMENTAL 123.5 MMBTU/HRRMC ENVIRONMENTAL 122.2 MMBTU/HR; 98.5 MMBTRMC ENVIRONMENTAL 128.7 MMBTU/HR; 98.5 MMBTRMC ENVIRONMENTAL 200 MMBTU/HRRMC ENVIRONMENTAL 200 MMBTU/HRRMC Environmental 2 MWRMC Environmental 1.5 MWEQM 9.4 tons/hourEQM 9.4 tons/hourEQMEQMEQMEQMJORDAN TECHNOLOGIES INC. 300 MILLION GAL/YRSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 500 klb steam/hrSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 500 klb steam/hrSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INCSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC

Page 196: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

WASTE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES LLC 5000 SCFMWASTE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES LLC 5000 SCFMINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 300 TPHINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 300 TPHENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 300 FPMENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 300 FPMDICK SHARP ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS (SES) 120 SHEETS PER MINUTEDICK SHARP ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS (SES) 88 SHEETS PER MINUTEDICK SHARP ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS (SES) 88 SHEETS PER MINUTEDICK SHARP ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS (SES) 120 SHEETS PER MINUTESHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 15 fpmSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 15 fpmSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 15 fpmSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 15 fpmSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 49 fpmSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 49 fpmKBD Technic 15.5 tphUNITED SCIENCES TESTING 268 MWGRACE CONSULTING 512 MWGRACE CONSULTING 512 MWUNITED SCIENCES TESTING 523 MWUNITED SCIENCES TESTING 523 MWGRACE CONSULTING 525 MWSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 500 FPM LINE SPEEDSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 600 FPM LINE SPEEDSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 280 FPM LINE SPEEDSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL 500 FPM LINE SPEEDSHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC 600 FPM LINE SPEEDALMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL INC 1000 FPMGRACE CONSULTING INC 450 MMBTU/HR/hr (300 KPPH)GRACE CONSULTING 245 MMBTU/HRGRACE CONSULTING NAGRACE CONSULTING 165 MMBTU/HRENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC 4 KETTLES RUNNINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 4 KETTLES OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC 4 KETTLES OPERATINGENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 4 KETTLES OPERATINGDOMINION RESOURCESDOMINION RESOURCES 4200 HPDOMINION RESOURCES 4200 HPDOMINION RESOURCESDOMINION RESOURCES 4200 HPDOMINION RESOURCES 4200 HPDOMINION RESOURCESDOMINION RESOURCESJORDAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1,205,000 GAL/DAYENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC 41 TPHENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT INC 41 TPHIndustrial Air Science fixedIndustrial Air Science fixedIndustrial Air Science 51.12 TPHANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS 2,500,000 gals of gasoline/dayCUBIX CORPORATION (GE) 45.69 MMBTU/HRCUBIX CORPORATION (GE)

Page 197: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CUBIX CORPORATION (GE)INDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 320 TPHINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCEINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 320 TPHINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCEINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 320 TPHINDUSTRIAL AIR SCIENCE 320 TPHAIR COMPLIANCE CONSULTANTS 7.59 tons per hourAIR COMPLIANCE CONSULTANTS 2.7 tons per hourAIR COMPLIANCE CONSULTANTS 32 bricks per minuteAIR COMPLIANCE CONSULTANTS 32 bricks per minuteMPC Refining Analytical & Development Department Environ500,000,000 gallons of gasolineMPC Refining Analytical & Development Environmental Field920,000,000 gallons of gasolineGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 30 TPHGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGRACE CONSULTING, INC. 22,500 LBS/HR SILICA SANDGrace Consulting 18,000 lbs/hrGrace Consulting 18,000 lbs/hrGrace Consulting 18,000 lbs/hrGrace Consulting 50,000 lbs/hr sand P005Grace ConsultingGrace ConsultingGrace ConsultingGrace ConsultingGrace ConsultingGrace ConsultingGrace ConsultingGrace ConsultingGrace ConsultingGrace ConsultingGrace Consulting 15 tons/hrGrace ConsultingGrace Consulting, Inc. 285 tphGrace Consulting, Inc. 285 tphGrace Consulting, Inc. 285 tphGrace Consulting, Inc. 656 lbs sulfur additions / 3 hourGrace Consulting, Inc. 285 tphGrace Consulting, Inc. 285 tphGrace Consulting, Inc. 285 tphAIR COMPLIANCE TESTING, INC 15000 lbs/hr of steamCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOU

Page 198: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC. 300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUCRA Inc. 800 ft/minAffiliated Environmental Services 350 TPHAffiliated Environmental ServicesAffiliated Environmental ServicesAffiliated Environmental Services 350 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services 350 TPHAffiliated Environmental Services 350 TPHJordan Technologies load only gasolineCustom Stack Analysis LLC 30 tons/hrCUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC.CUSTOM STACK ANALYSIS, LLC.Custom Stack Analysis, LLC. 20,000 POUNDS OF SALT/HOAir Compliance Testing, Inc. See BelowCustom Stack AnalysisCustom Stack AnalysisCustom Stack AnalysisCustom Stack Analysis 220 mmbtuCustom Stack Analysis 220 mmbtuCustom Stack Analysis 220 mmbtuCustom Stack AnalysisCustom Stack Analysis 220 mmbtuCustom Stack Analysis 180 mmBtuCustom Stack AnalysisCustom Stack AnalysisCustom Stack Analysis 180 mmBtuCustom Stack Analysis 180 mmBtuCustom Stack Analysis 180 mmBtuCustom Stack Analysis 180 mmBtuCustom Stack Analysis test not completedAir Analysis, Inc. 9800 amps/hourPPG IndustriesPPG IndustriesPPG Industries 1400 pounds per hourCustom Stack Analysis 24 gallons per hour

Page 199: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

ALLOWABLE RATE0.030 gr/dscf0.030 gr/dscf0.030 gr/dscf0.030 gr/dscf0.030 gr/dscf0.030 gr/dscf0.030 gr/DSCF0.030 gr/DSCF0.030 gr/DSCF0.05 gr/dscf0.05 gr/dscf40 ppm

8 lb/hr and 40 lb/day VOC3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven; 8 lb/hr and 40 lb/day VOC w/o oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven; 8 lb/hr and 40 lb/day VOC w/o oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven; 8 lb/hr and 40 lb/day VOC w/o oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven; 8 lb/hr and 40 lb/day VOC w/o oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven; 8 lb/hr and 40 lb/day VOC w/o oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven; 8 lb/hr and 40 lb/day VOC w/o ovenUMRE*UMRE*UMRE*3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven3lb/hr and/15 lb/day VOC w/ oven0.004 inches of pressure drop38.4 lbs OC/hr90% OC destruction efficiency90% OC destruction efficiency90% OC destruction efficiency20%no VE outside building0.0005 grain/DSCF20% as 6-minute avgno VE of fugitive dust41.1 pounds per hour20%, as a 6-min avg.8.3 pounds per hourno visible emissions97.5% DE97.5% DE97.5% DE97.5% DE

Page 200: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

97.5% DE97.5% DE97.5% DE1.7 lbs/hr (98% DRE)0.025 lb/hr (PTE analysis)4.05 lbs/hr0.073 lb/hr (PTE analysis)1.125 lbs/hr; 95% ce1.125 lbs/hr; 95% ce7.53 pound per hour0.12 pound per hour

0.58 pound per hour

0.94 pound per hour0.54 pound per hour

0.94 lb/hr

0.12 lb/hr0.58 lb/hr7.53 lb/hr

0.57 pound per hour1.125 lbs/hr; 95% ce0.17 pound per hour19.48 pound per hour0.15 pound per hour

0.26 lb/hr6.61 lbs/hr1.4 lbs/hr98% destruction/20 ppm VOC outlet

Page 201: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.14 lb methanol/hr9.03 lbs CO/hr0.27 lb formaldehy/hr98% DRE/20 ppm VOC outlet

0.191 lb formaldehyde/hr0.175 lb methanol/hr

98% destruction/20 ppm oc outlet4.2 lbs CO/hr0.191 lb formaldehyde/hr0.175 lb methanol/hr

98% DRE/20 ppm VOC outlet4.2 lbs CO/hr

1.4 lbs/hr0.26 lb/hr98% destruction/20 ppm VOC outlet12.0 lbs VOC/hr; 95% DRE95% DE95% DE95% DE95% DE95% DE95% DE69.4

0.02 lb/mmBtu (oil fire)0.02 lb/mmBtu0.02 lb PM / MMBtu

0.02 lb/MMBtu

100% capture98% DRE98% DRE100% capture98% DRE100% capture98% DRE100% capture98% DRE100% capture100% capture98% DRE28.2 lbs/hr

Page 202: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

116.3 lbs/hr27.0 lbs/hr3.96 lbs/hr; 0.04 gr/dscf5% as 6-min avg.0.462 lb/hr0.462 lb/hr0.462 lb/hr0.462 lb/hr9.74 lb/hr1.59 lb/hr17.84 lb/hr17.84 lb/hr8.33 lb/hr9.74 lb/hr0.000009 lb/mmbtu0.07 lb/mmbtu0.09 lb/mmbtu20%N/A8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.

Page 203: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.8 lbs/hr @ 95% destruction eff.1.0 lb/hr0.2 lb/hr0.90 lb/hr0.53 lb/hr4.80 lb/hr

Page 204: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

2.40 lb/hr8.0 lb/hrNA0.60 lb/hr0.42 lb/hr0.42 lb/hr4.80 lb/hr2.40 lb/hr400 PPM @ 3% o295% Destruction Efficiency100 ppmvd @ 7% O21.02 lbs SO2/hr19.2 lbs VOC/hr

0.03 gr/dscf51 lbs CO/hr63% DF3.5 lbs/hr2.6 lbs/hr1.1 lbs/hr0.8 lbs/hr1.54 lbs/hr1.54 lbs/hr8 lbs/hr0.1 lb/mmBtu actual heat input0.04 gr/dscfreduce formaldehyde by 76% or more90 % voc destruction efficiency90 % voc destruction efficiency90 % voc destruction efficiency90 % voc destruction efficiency3.44 lbs OC/hr

Page 205: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

76% reduction76% reduction76% reduction76% reduction76% reduction76% reduction76% reduction76% reduction76% reduction

12.44 lbs/hour

12.44 lbs/hour

14.5 lbs/hr37.08 tons/12-months99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE99% DE0.005 grain/dscf & 2.27 lbs/hour0.0025 grain/dscf & 1.14 lbs/hour0.005 grain/dscf and 1.71 lbs/hour0.0025 grain/dscf and 0.86 lb/hour0.0025 grain/dscf and 0.24 lb/hour0.005 grain/dscf and 0.48 lb/hour0.0025 grain/dscf and 0.84 lb/hour0.005 grain/dscf and 1.69 lbs/hour<10% RA<10% RA100% total enclosure (0.007 in H20)8.9lbs/hr;98% reduction100% total enclosure (0.007 in H20)21.73lbs/hr;98.3% reduction8.27 lbs per hour8.27 lbs per hour for P002 and P007 each8.27 lbs per hour for P002 and P007 each8.27 lbs per hour10lbs SO2/ton product

Page 206: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

46.9lbs/hr particulate emissions10 lbs SO2/ton of product46.9lbs/hr particulate emissions0.04 gr/dscf0.1 lb/mmBtu0.1 lb/mmBtu0.1 lb/mmBtu0.1 lb/mmBtu0.1 lb/mmBtu0.1 lb/mmBtu0.1 lb/mmBtu95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC95% DE or 25 ppm VOC

0.15 lb/mmbtu0.15 lb/mmbtuNA0.20 lb/MM BtuNANA0.20 lb/MM BtuNA

0.025 #/MMBTU010 #/MMBTU

crushers - 15%, screens & transfer - 10%, wet screen - no VE2.71 lbs nox/mmbtu0.10 lbs pe/mmbtu18.04 lbs co/mmbtu10% for transfer points and screening, and 15% for secondary crushers95% destruction85.5% overall efficiency

Page 207: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

80 mg/L VOCOverall Efficiency at least 85%85% overall efficiency85% overall efficiency90% DE, 85% overall0.01 gr/dscf0.02 gr/dscf; 60.1 lbs/hr0.01 gr/dscf; 0.0052 gr/dscf0.01 gr/dscf; 0.03 lb/ton95.00% destrustio90% destruction0.1 lb/mmBtu0.1 lb/mmBtu4.53 lbs/hr, 0.04 gr/dscf81 % overall efficiency0.025 gr/dscf, 4.3 lbs/hr0.04 gr/dscf33.9 lbs/hr

0.015 gr/dscf pm100 ppm hcl

0.04 gr/dscfCO destruction efficiency 93% @100+/-10% load10.38 lbs/hr59.5 lbs/hr combined w/ P90359.5 lbs/hr combined w/ P9010.010 gr/dscf0.010 gr/dscf0.010 gr/dscf0.010 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.015 gr/dscf0.015 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.01 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.015 gr/dscf0.015 gr/dscf0.015 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.015 gr/dscf0.015 gr/dscf

Page 208: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf0.006 gr/dscf99% control efficiency99% control efficiency, 0.4 #/hr HCl0.35 lb/MM BTU2.59 lbs/hr35 lbs/ton sulfuric acid producedno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowableno established allowable20 ppm, 0% excess oxygen, db1.0 lbs/hr; 99% DRE91.2 lbs/hr

25.2 lbs/hr

400 ppmv (db), corrected to 3% oxygen400 ppmv (db) corrected to 3% oxygenn/an/a0.03 lbs/MMBTU0.08 lbs/MMBTU

0.03 lbs/MMBTU

0.08 lbs/MMBTU

0.225 lbs/mmBTU5.8 lbs/hr< 60 ft/sec (flare tip exit velocity)186.0 lbs/hr57.0 lbs/hr, 99% DRE57.0 lbs/hr, 99% DRE

0.15 lbs/ton asphalt0.10 lbs/ton asphalt

0.033 lbs/ton asphalt; 50 lbs/hr0.15 lbs/ton asphalt

Page 209: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.005 grains/dscf0.005 grains/dscf

0.28 lbs/mmBTU

To Be Determined50.0 lbs/hr45.5 lbs/hr50.0 lbs/hr39.4 lbs/hr495.4 lbs/hr7.4 lbs/hr21.2 lbs/hr0.38 lbs/hr

17.7 lbs/hr

0.01 gr/dscf

see below

see below

Page 210: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.010 gr/dscfsee below

10 lbs/hr2.17 lbs/hr2.17 lbs/hr4.35 lbs/hr1.67 lbs/hr

2.06 lbs/hr

3.30 lbs/hr1.0 lbs/hr

2.06 lbs/hr1.67 lbs/hr

3.30 lbs/hr65.4 lbs/hr10 lbs/hr

Page 211: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

10 lbs/hr10 lbs/hr8.1 lbs/hr10 lbs/hr10 lbs/hr9.1 lbs/hr11.0 lbs/ton glass pulled11.0 lbs/ton glass pulled11.0 lbs/ton glass pulled11.0 lbs/ton glass pulled11.0 lbs/ton glass pulled9.9 lbs/hr9.02 lbs/hr7.76 lbs/hr1.63 lbs/hr1.53 lbs/hr

16.1 lbs/hr; 0.04 gr/dscf

7.91 lbs/hr20% opacity as a six-minute average4.2 lbs/hr

4.2 lbs/hr18.1 lbs/hr (stack); 0.51 lbs/100 lbs beads; 95% DRE2.16 lbs/hr; 0.0042 gr/dscf1.54 lbs/hr; 0.0030 gr/dscf2.16 lbs/hr; 0.0042 gr/dscf1.54 lbs/hr; 0.0030 gr/dscf1.85 lbs/hr; 0.0030 gr/dscf2.59 lbs/hr; 0.0042 gr/dscf1.85 lbs/hr; 0.0030 gr/dscf2.59 lbs/hr; 0.0042 gr/dscf1.85 lbs/hr; 0.0030 gr/dscf2.59 lbs/hr; 0.0042 gr/dscf1.85 lbs/hr; 0.0030 gr/dscf2.59 lbs/hr; 0.0042 gr/dscf2.59 lbs/hr; 0.0042 gr/dscf1.85 lbs/hr; 0.0030 gr/dscf2.59 lbs/hr; 0.0042 gr/dscf1.85 lbs/hr; 0.0030 gr/dscfTo Be DeterminedTo Be DeterminedTo Be DeterminedTo Be Determined4.5 lbs/gallon coating solids4.5 lbs/gallon coating solidssee below0.13 lb/MMBtu

Page 212: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.13 lb/MMBtu0.13 lb/MMBtu0.13 lb/MMBtu4.1 lbs/hr0.13 lbs/MMBtu0.000009 lbs/MMBtu0.13 lbs/MMBtu0.000009 lbs/MMBtu4.84 lbs/hr, 95% DRE4.84 lbs/hr, 95% DRE3.44 lbs/hr95% DRE129.7 lbs/hr129.7 lbs/hr4.06 lbs/hr17.5 lbs/hr

17.5 lbs/hr284.2 lbs/hr

1.57 lbs/hr0.65 lbs/hr

20.16 lbs/hr5.0 min/2 hr< 60 ft/sec0.72 lbs/hr, 0.015 gr/dscf, 0.10 lbs/100 lbs charged0.01 lbs/hr, 0.07 gr/1000 dscfno established hourly limit4.29 lbs/hr; 0.02 gr/dscf0.07 lb/MMBtu (MACT), 0.12 lb/MMBtu (Title V)0.09 lb/MMBtu0.000009 lb/MMBtu41.8 lbs/hr; 0.60 lbs/ton stone feedno established limit

no established limitno established limit25.0 lbs/ton product

no established limit

25.0 lbs/ton productno established limit41.8 lbs/hr; 0.60 lbs/ton stone feedno established limit0.10 lbs/hr5.0 lbs/hr3.0 lbs/hr0.6 lbs/hr1.80 lbs/hr0.000009 lbs/mmBTU

Page 213: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.09 lbs/mmBTU0.07 lbs/mmBTUSee memo0.04 gr/dscf0.097 lbs/ton asphalt produced18 ppmv; 12.2 lbs/hrTo Be DeterminedTo Be Determined2.30 lbs/hr; 98% control efficinency1.34 lbs/hr

2.06 lbs/hr

5.32 lbs/hr22.09 lbs/hr

0.15 lbs/hr13.11 lbs/hr; 95% DRE

13.11 lbs/hr; 95% DRE22.09 lbs/hr0.15 lbs/hr4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE4.73 lbs/hr; 95% DRE1.87 lb/ton glass pulled0.50 lb/ton glass pulled

0.01 lb/ton2.02 lb/ton0.04 lb/ton20% opacity0.36 lb/ton

0.50 lb/ton glass pulled0.36 lb/ton1.87 lb/ton glass pulled0.04 lb/ton

2.02 lb/ton0.01 lb/ton20% opacity0.021 lb/hr0.01 lb/ton

Page 214: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.026 lb/hr0.01 lb/ton0.01lb/hr0.021 lb/hr0.01lb/hr0.021 lb/hr0.01lb/hr0.021 lb/hr0.01lb/hr0.021 lb/hr0.026 lb/hr0.000437 gr/dscf0.026 lb/hr0.000437 gr/dscf0.000437 gr/dscf0.026 lb/hr0.000437 gr/dscf0.026 lb/hr0.021 lb/hr0.01 lb/ton

5% opacity8.80lb/hr

8.66 lb/hr.75 lb/hr21.0 lb/hr95% or greater control Efficiency95% or greater control Efficiency16.5 lbs/hr PE+- 10% of applicable method+- 10% of applicable method+- 10% of applicable method+- 20% of the RM3.29 lb co/hr

400 ppmv db @ 3% O2400 ppmv db@3% O230 ppmv db @ 3% o230 ppmv db @ 3% o2na13.10 lb/hr0.019 lb/hr vocvoc is 0.109 lb/hrvoc is 0.109 lb/hrvoc is 0.109 lb/hrvoc is 0.109 lb/hrvoc is 0.109 lb/hrvoc is 0.109 lb/hrvoc is 0.109 lb/hrna15% opacity0.73 lb/MMBtu

Page 215: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.13 lb/MMBtu160 ppm h2s in fuel gas160 ppm h2s in fuel gas160 ppm h2s in fuel gas160 ppm h2s in fuel gas160 ppm h2s in fuel gas160 ppm h2s in fuel gas160 ppm (standard) H2S10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of applicable standard10% of appli standard10% of appli standard140.9 ppm160 ppm (standard) H2S<5 min/120 min.<5 min/120 min.<5 min/120 min.<5 min/120 min.<5 min/120 min.10% of RM34.48 lb/hr<20% of applicable standard10 ppm HCl, or 97% control efficiency10 ppm HCl, or 97% control efficiency10 ppm HCl, or 97% control efficiency10 ppm HCl, or 97% control efficiency10 ppm HCl, or 97% control efficiency+-10%(20%) of applicable standard10% of RM69.15 ppmv db O2 free1.0 % O2 max avg diff5% of applicable 500 ppmv standard1.0 % O2 max avg diff

102.7 lbs/hr59.5 lbs/hr10 ppmv

Page 216: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.460 lb/hr0.460 lb/hr

10 ppmv10-15% opacity200 tph2.67 lbs/hr H2SO441.1 lb/hr PM25.64 lb.hr38.91 lb.hr PM

200 lb/hr2.67 lbs/hr H2SO441.1 lb/hr PM100 lb/hr SO24.5 lbs/hr VOC36.7 %>92% DRE>92% DRE>92% DRE>92% DRE>92% DRE95% DRE61% Capture and Control61% Capture and Control95% DRE minimum95% DRE61% Capture & Control Efficiency61% Capture & Control Efficiency95 % DRE5.75 lb/hr42.5 lb/hr

7.63 lb/hr30 lb/hr0.01 gr/dscf3512.0 lbs VOC/day95 % min. DRE0.37 lb/hr0.081 lb/hr0.025 lb/hr0.21 lb/hr0.21 lb/hr0.025 lb/hr0.0082 lb/hr0.33 lb/hr0.065 lb/hr0.33 lb/hr0.0082 lb/hr

Page 217: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.06 lb/hr0.081 lb/hr0.37 lb/hr0.0082 lb/hr0.06 lb/hr0.065 lb/hr0.33 lb/hr0.2 lb/hr1.54 lb/hr0.26 lb/hr7.05 lb/hr

9.0E-5 lbs/lb of product1.09 lb/hr9.0E-5 lbs/lb1.12 lb/hr3.04 lb/hr

28.5 pounds/hour

17.6 pounds/hour0.040 gr/dscf80.0 pounds/hour0.10 lb/million Btu heat input0.1 pound per million Btu0.1 pound per million Btu0.1lb/million Btu heat input0.1 pound/million Btu20%, 3-min avg0.10 lb/mmbtu0.10 pound/million Btu0.1 lb/million Btu heat input0.10 pound/million Btu0.08 pound particulate/million Btu0.0075 gr/dscf, 5.78 lb/hr0.0075 gr/dscf, 5.78 lb/hr0.0075 gr/dscf, 5.78 lb/hr0.1 pound/million Btu0.1 pound/million Btu0.1 pound/million Btu0.1 pound/million Btu0.1 pound/million Btu3.2 pounds/hour

Page 218: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

90% overall eff., 29.5 pounds/hour90% overall eff., 29.5 pounds/hour90% overall eff., 29.5 pounds/hour90% overall eff., 29.5 pounds/hour90% overall eff., 29.5 pounds/hour0.01 gr/dscf2.24 pounds HF/hour10% Opacity18.4 pounds/hour80.0 pounds/hour31.9 pounds/hour

0.040 gr/dscf0.01 gr/dscf0.07 gr/dscf0.118 gr/dscf167 pounds/hour65.26 lb/hr; 97.5% dest.65.26 lb/hr; 97.5% dest.65.26 lb/hr; 97.5% dest.

98% Control Efficiency90% Control Efficiency90% Control Efficiency98% Control Efficiency

90% Control Efficiency98% Control Efficiency98% Control Efficiency90% Control Efficiency

90% Control Efficiency98% Control Efficiency

98% Control Efficiency90% Control Efficiency0.312 pound/million Btu

0.005 pound/million Btu0.02 pound/million Btu20%0.1 pound/million Btu heat input0.1 pound/million Btu heat input0.1 pound/million Btu heat input

Page 219: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1.83 pounds/hour

2.95 pounds/hour46.5 pounds/hour69.69 pounds/hour

2.87 pounds/hour

2.41 pounds/hour0.00045 pounds/hour2.98 pounds/hour0.1 lb/millionBtu heat input0.1 lb/million Btu heat input0.1 lb/millionBtu heat input0.1 lb/million Btu heat input0.1 lb/millionBtu heat input0.1 lb/millionBtu heat input0.1 lb/million Btu heat input14.5 pounds per hour, 0.03 gr/dscf9.12 pounds per hour0.69 pounds per hour7.22 pounds per hour19.2 pounds per hour8.23 pounds per hour, 0.05 gr/dscf6.6 pounds per hour15.67 pounds per hour4.28 pounds per hour, 0.029 gr/dscf4.28 pounds per hour, 0.029 gr/dscf3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced3.0 lb f/ton al produced52.0 pounds/hour37.6 pounds/hour

26.4 pound/hour

Page 220: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.03 grains/dscf58.99 lb/hr58.99 lb/hr0.03 gr/dscf20% Opacity2.3 tons VOC/year0.03 gr/dscf2.3 tons VOC/year20% Opacity10%15% Opacity15% Opacity, 10% Opacity10% opacity15% Opacity10% opacity as a 6-minute average10% (as a 6-minute average)175 pounds/hour, 75% control eff.175 pounds/hour, 75% control eff.175 pounds/hour, 75% control eff.11.74 pounds per hourNo VEs except 5 mins/2 hr blockminimum 7.45MJ/scm,60.0 fps,3.0 pounds/hour1.50 pounds/hour0.057 grams/dry standard cubic meter19.8 pounds/hour105 pounds/hour0.03 grain/dscf

42 pounds/hour0.19 pound/million Btu0.004 gr/dscf0.008 gr/dscf0.004 gr/dscf47.09 lbs VOC/hour Combined, 90% Control47.09 lbs VOC/hour Combined, 90% Control47.09 lbs VOC/hour Combined, 90% Control47.09 lbs VOC/hour Combined, 90% Control47.09 lbs VOC/hour Combined, 90% Control47.09 lbs VOC/hour Combined, 90% Control0.005 gr/dscf0.004 gr/dscf0.89 lb/million Btu0.16 lb/million Btu0.042 lb/million Btu

0.051 lb/million Btu3.2 lb/million Btu3.2 lb/million Btu0.89 lb/million Btu0.051 lb/million Btu0.16 lb/million Btu

Page 221: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.042 lb/million Btu

none275.7 lbs/hr124.8 lbs/hrnone226.5 pounds/hour

<50 pounds/hourN/A

10% Opacitycrusher-15%, conveyors-10%0.030 lb/million Btu0.30 pound/million Btu0.10 lb/mmbtu10%, 3-min avg22.0 lb/hr(24 hr avg), 90% Dest. Eff.5.7 pounds/hour9.4 pounds/hour

5.7 pounds/hour9.4 pounds/hour

6.8 pounds/hour299.8 pounds/hour290.4 pounds/hour

19.5 pounds/hour19.5 pounds/hour299.8 pounds/hour

6.8 pounds/hour290.4 pounds/hour

337.3 pounds/hour

10.0 pounds/hour10.0 pounds/hour

9.17 pounds/hour337.3 pounds/hour

10.0 pounds/hour10.0 pounds/hour9.17 pounds/hour0.67 lb VOC/1000gal, 35mg/l0.67 lb VOC/1000gal, 35mg/l24.7 pounds/hour

Page 222: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

20% opacity as a 6-minute average20% opacity as a 6-minute average35.9 pounds/hourN/A21.7 pounds/hour20% opacity as a 6-minute average20% opacity as a 6-minute average27.2 pounds/hour4.2 pounds per hour

0.10 lbs/MMBtuCo -6 ppmvd, NOx- 3 ppmvdCo -6 ppmvd, NOx- 3 ppmvdCo -6 ppmvd, NOx- 3 ppmvdCo -6 ppmvd, NOx- 3 ppmvd0.6 lb/MMBtu11.35 lbs/hr25.7 lb/hr (all sources vented to CR)25.7 lb/hr (all sources vented to CR)25.7 lb/hr (all sources vented to CR)25.7 lb/hr (all sources vented to CR)25.7 lb/hr (all sources vented to CR)25.7 lb/hr (all sources vented to CR)8.0 lbs/hr0.015 gr/dscf20.3 lb/hrsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo below0.015 gr/dscf from FMDC0.015 gr/dscf from FMDC0.015 gr/dscf from FMDC0.015 gr/dscf from FMDC0.015 gr/dscf from each FMDC, SSDC, EFDC0.015 gr/dscf from each FMDC, SSDC, EFDC0.015 gr/dscf from each FMDC, WCC0.015 gr/dscf from each FMDC, WCC0.015 gr/dscf from each FMDC, WCC0.015 gr/dscf from each FMDC, WCC0.015 gr/dscf0.015 gr/dscf from each EFDC, WCC0.015 gr/dscf90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; 8 LB/HR, 40 LB/DAY VOC

8.69 LB CO/HR

8.69 LB CO/HR

Page 223: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

8.69 LB CO/HR

8.69 LB CO/HR

0.26 lb/hr, 95% DE0.01 GR/DSCF; 0.52 LB/HR0.01 GR/DSCF; 1.76 LB/HR0.01 GR/DSCF; 1.31LB/HR

9.0 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER

0.30 LB PE/ TON FEED

9.0 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER0.30 LB PE/ TON FEED

2.0 LB SO2/MMBTU HEAT INPUT

0.10 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT

0.04 GR/ DSCF23.2 LB SO2/HR12.8 LB VOC/HR

52 CO/HR7.61 LB/HR VOC; 97% OVERALL VOC REMOVAL7.61 LB/HR VOC; 97% OVERALL VOC REMOVAL60 mg VOC/ L accountable GAS loaded; 0.50 lb VOC/1000 GALLONS1582 LB VOC / MONTH; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY815 LB VOC/ MONTH; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY53.93 LB VOC/ DAY; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY29.74 LB VOC/ DAY; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY53.93 LB VOC/DAY; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY53.48 LB VOC/DAY; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY33.20 LB VOC/DAY; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY33.20 LB VOC/DAY; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY3 LB VOC/DAY; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY23.47 LB VOC/DAY; 90% OVERALL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY0.466 LB /HR PE

Page 224: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

5.88 LB/HR CO

5.88 LB/HR CO

45.5 LB/HR

0.14 LB PE/ MMBTU HEAT INPUT

0.06 LB PE/ MMBTU HEAT INPUTnot applicablenot applicablenot applicable0.10 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT1.6 PE SO2/ MMBTU HEAT INPUTnot applicable1.6 LB SO2/ MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT0.10 LB PE/ MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUTnot applicable0.10 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT1.6 LB SO2/MMBTU HEAT INPUT1.6 LB SO2/ MMBTU HEAT INPUT0.10 LB PE/ MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT0.10 LB PE/ MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT1.6 LB SO2/ MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUTnot applicable0.10 LB PE/ MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT1.6 LB SO2/ MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY97% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY

Page 225: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3.5 lbs/hour2.0 lbs/hour0.1 lb/mmBtu0.1 lb/mmbtu0.1 lb/mmbtu0.1 lb/mmbtu

3.0 lbs OC/hour1.15 lbs/hour (P001) and 2.13 lbs/hour (P002)8 lbs/hour1.15 lbs/hour (P001) and 2.13 lbs/hour (P002)0.21 lbs/hr10.0 TPY0.010 gr/dscf0.01 grains/dscf20.28 lbs/hr0.57 lbs/hr401.74 lbs/hr23.02 lbs/hr0.052 lbs/hr10% opacity25.0 lbs/hr3% opacity

264.1 lbs/hr

0.10 lb/100 pounds of dry material charged0.022 gr/dscf10% opacity as a 3-minute average10% opacity as a 3-minute average43.6 lbs/hour of particulate emissions7% opacity as a 6-minute average10% opacity as a 3-minute average10% opacity as a 3-minute average43.6 lbs/hour of particulate emissions0.98 lb/hr57.2 lbs/hour10% opacity as 6 minute average

6.8 lb/hour0.15lb/hr pb3.4 lbs/hr pe; 0.022 grain/dscf10 TPY10 TPY10 TPY10 TPY10 TPY0.062 lb/hr

20 ppm

Page 226: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

8.30 lb/hr1.51 lb/hr

8.30 lb/hr

1.51 lb/hr20 ppm0.062 lb/hr15 lb VOC/hr see memo1.2 lb VOC/hr (fugitive)1.2 lb VOC/hr (fugitive)15% opacity as a six-minute average

TBD

40.98 lb/hr pxTBDTBD

0.031 lb/mmbtuSee Notes

See Notes0.031 lb/mmbtuSee NotesSee Notes

0.031 lb/mmBtu AND 0.01 gr/acf

74.1% OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCYSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTS0.03 GR/DSCF20% AS 3 MIN AVG0.01 GR/DSCF20% AS 3 MIN AVG0.01 GR/DSCF0.03 GR/DSCF73.76 LB/HR0.03 GR/DSCF73.76 LB/HR18 PPM0.03 GR/DSCF20% OPACITY AS A 6-MIN AVERAGE0.35 LB/MMBTU

Page 227: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.60 LB/MMBTU20% OPACITY AS A 6-MIN AVG0.60 LB/MMBTU0.25 LB/MMBTU0.456 LB/MMBTU10% OPACITY AS A SIX-MIN AVG0.24 LB/MMBTUSEE MEMO0.11 LB/MMBTU PM; 0.072 LB/MMBTU PM1020% AS SIX-MINUTE AVG51.0 LB/HR0.14 LB/MMBTU10% RA1.72 LB/HRNA0.15 lb/mmbtu0.15 lb/mmbtu<20% RA LB/MMBTU NOx, PPM NOx0.15 lb/mmbtu3.3 LB/HR; 93% CONTROL3.3 LB/HR; 93% CONTROL

15% OPACITY

SEE MEMO0.025 LB/MMBTU7.5% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA10% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA10% RA0.10 LB/MMBTU7.5% RA ANNUAL7.5% RA ANNUAL10% RA0.10 lb/mmbtu0.01 lb/mmbtu4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE

Page 228: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE0.13 LB/MMBTU0.03 LB/MMBTU4.67 LB/HR and >99% CE0.68 LB/HR PM3.65 LB/HR VOC>95% CONTROL EFFICINECY>95% CONTROL EFFICINECY>95% CONTROL EFFICINECY20% RA>98% CONTROL EFFICIENCY>98% CONTROL EFFICIENCY>98% CONTROL EFFICIENCY2.54 LB/HR OC2.59 LB/HR OC7.5% RA NOX; 10% RA CO2, FLOW2.59 LB/HR OC2.54 LB/HR OC7.5% RA NOX; 10% RA CO2, FLOW1.2 LB/MMBTU

0.1 LB/MMBTU2.59 LB/HR OC2.54 LB/HR OC

1.88 LB/MMBTU0.26 lb/mmbtu9.9 TPY1.91 LB/HR; >70% DRE1.97 LB/HR W/O DUCT BURNER; 89% DE1.97 LB/HR W/O DUCT BURNER; 89% DE2.84 LB/HR W DUCT BURNER; 89% DE2.84 LB/HR W DUCT BURNER; 89% DE20% RA (PPM AND LB/MMBTU)20% RA (PPM AND LB/MMBTU)>70% DRE>70% DRE1.1 lb/ton of sludge115.02 tpy

35 MG/L OF LODED GASOLINE0.10 LB/MMBTU1.20 LB/MMBTU

Page 229: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

min 200Btu/scf and max velocity 103 f/sMAX 5 MIN VE IN A 2 HR PERIOD39.0LB/HR17.4 LB/HR65% CAPTURE EFFICIENCY90% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY81% OVERALL CONTROL81% OVERALL CONTROL90% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY90% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY90% DE81% CE90% DE81% CE81% CE90% DE8.76 lb/hr7.5% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA7.5% RA0.10 LB/MMBTU95% CONTROL EFFICIENCY95% CONTROL EFFICIENCY95% CONTROL EFFICIENCY95% CONTROL EFFICIENCY95% CONTROL EFFICIENCY1.3 LB/HR, >90%DESEE MEMO FIELDSEE MEMO BELOWSEE MEMO BELOW400 PPM @ 3%O2>96% DE>96% DE>96% DE>96% DE

0.98 G/HP-HR 8.33 LB/HR2.8 G/HP -HR 25.93 LB/HR

2.8 G/HP-HR 25.93 LB/HR0.98 G/HP-HR 8.33 LB/HR

10 MG/L GASOLINE LOADED2.2 LB/HR13.1 LB/HR10.5 lbs/hr total organic10.5 lbs/hr0.22 LB/HR 0.96 TPY80 mg/liter of gasoline6.0 LB/HR

Page 230: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

41.3 LB/HR

1.5 LB/HR

128.0 LB/HR0.04 GR/DSCF; 8.0 LB/HR15.9 lbs/hr14.8 lbs/hr13.6 lbs/hr2.64 lbs/hr10 mg OC per liter of gasoline loaded10 mg OC per liter of gasoline loaded14.2 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE4.78 LBS/HR PE0.01 lb/hr PM100.04 lb/hr PE0.04 lb/hr VOC DMIPA2.67 lbs/hr PE

17.4 lbs/hr PE

2.44 lb/hr5% opacity3.12 lb/hr525 lbs / 3 hrs2.44 lb/hr (filterable + condensable)3.12 lb/hr5% opacity.30 lbs/mmbtu100 PPM CORRECTED TO 7% OXYGEN40 PPM CORRECTED TO 7% OXYGEN0.0042 POUND/HOUR0.0076 POUND/HOUR0.070 GRAIN/1000 DSCF CORRECTED TO 7% OXYGEN

Page 231: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.52 GRAIN/1000 DSCF CORRECTED TO 7 % OXYGEN0.030 GRAINS/DSCF5% OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE0.24 GRAIN/1000 DSCF CORRECTED TO 7% OXYGEN0.0076 POUND/HOUR0.0015 POUND PER HOUR4.94 lb/hr20.1 lbs SO2/hr

80.0 lbs/hr0.04 gr/dscf19.55 lbs/hr24.02 lbs/hr3.49 lbs/hr

0.05 GRAM/DSCMSee Below

20 percentn/a0.0295 lb/mmbtu

7.0 lb/mmbtu18 pounds per hour

0.08 #/mmBtu0.053 #/mmBtu0.36 #/hr0.24 #/mmBtutest not completed0.03 mg/dscm chromium

500 ppm for a leak95 percent destruction

Page 232: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

TESTED OPERATING RATEN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A??7 tons per hour????7 tons per hour????7 tons per hour??N/A (Method 9)95 lbs/hr95 lbs/hr

NANANANANANANA83.9 lbs/hr cut83.9 lbs/hr cut83.9 lbs/hr cut1917 lb resin/hr1917 lb resin/hr1917 lb resin/hr1917 lb resin/hr1917 lb resin/hr1917 lb resin/hrNA490 sets/hr200 sets/hr200 sets/hr200 sets/hr18.9 ton/hr18.9 ton/hr18.9 ton/hrOperatingOperatingOperating2 Large Parts (30min each) per run2 Large Parts (30min each) per run2 Large Parts (30min each) per runN/AN/AN/AN/A

Page 233: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

N/AN/AN/A13 gallons methanol/min13 gallons methanol/hr13 gallons methanol/hr13 gallons methanol/hrNANA500 lb/hr500 lb/hr

500 lb/hr

500 lb/hr500 lb/hr

602 lb/hr

602 lb/hr602 lb/hr602 lb/hr

600 lb/hr600 lb/hr600 lb/hr600 lb/hr600 lb/hr

15.5 gpm15.5 gpm15.5 gpm15.5 gpm

Page 234: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

20 gallons feed/minute20 gallons feed/minute20 gallons feed/minute20 gallons feed/minute

101,637 lbs phenol formaldehyde charged101,637 lbs phenol formaldehyde charged

101,637 lbs phenol formaldehyde charged101,637 lbs phenol formaldehyde charged14,998 lbs formaldehyde charge14,998 lbs formaldehyde charge

14,998 lbs formaldehyde charge14,998 lbs formaldehyde charge

15.5 gpm15.5 gpm15.5 gpm methanol feed4.66 average gal/hr coating appliedmax. normal operationsmax. normal operationsmax. normal operationsmax. normal operationsmax. normal operationsmax. normal operations309 TPH

unknown161 mmBtu/hr (See memo)N/A

147.8 klbs/hr steam

see commentssee commentssee commentssee commentssee commentssee commentssee commentssee commentssee commentssee commentssee commentssee comments254 TPH

Page 235: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

254 TPH254 TPH254 TPHN/A7488.8 lb/hr pull rate7488.8 lb/hr pull rate7488.8 lb/hr pull rate7488.8 lb/hr pull rate7488 lb/hr7488 lb/hr7488 lb/hr7488 lb/hr7489 lb/hr7493 lb/hr~44,000 lb/hr steam load~44,000 lb/hr steam load~44,000 lb/hr steam load~44,000 lb/hr steam loadN/Abatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatch

Page 236: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

batchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatchbatch1893 tubes/hour1893 tubes/hour1.83 gal/hr0.60 gal/hr2.37 gal/hr

Page 237: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1.43 gal/hr0.33 gal/hr2.67gal/hr1.36 gal/hr0.33 gal/hr0.32 gal/hr2.73 gal/hr4.50 gal/hrappx. 42 (normal operations per MACT)N/AN/A120 TPH120 TPH

120 TPH120 TPH67 units/hr40,000 lbs/hr40,000 lbs/hr40,000 lbs/hr40,000 lbs/hr40,000 lbs/hr40,000 lbs/hr4.8 tph2,058 mmBtu/hr260 tons/hr354 KW680 lbs/hr product722 lbs/hr product222 lbs/hr product1265.85 lbs/hr resin average809.42 lbs VOC input/hr; 5,924.08 lbs paste/hr

Page 238: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

94.9% load97.4%100.3%100.4% load98.4% load99.4% load87.3% load94.7% load90.6% load

41.8 mmBtu/hr

41.8 mmBtu/hr

5.02 tons/hr5.02 tons/hr220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE220.9 lbs from TPE800 parts per hour800 parts per hour10,800 parts/hour10,800 parts/hour14,663 parts per hour14,663 parts per hour764 parts/hour764 parts/hour>50%>50%typicalmaximumtypicalmaximumnonenonenonenone7.4 tph coal and 51 tph stone

Page 239: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

7.4 tph coal and 51 tph stone7.4 tph coal and 51 tph stone7.4 tph coal and 51 tph stone165 tons/hr1440 mmBtu/hour1461 mmbtu/hour1,362 mmbtu/hour2,458 mmbtu/hour5,542 mmbtu/hour1,133 lb/mmBtu6,466 lb/mmBtucontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuouscontinuous processcontinuous process

220 mmbtu/hr220 mmbtu/hr0.010 lb/MM Btu40000 lbs steam40000 lbs steam0.008 lb/MM Btu41000 lbs steam41000 lbs steam

32, 000 # of steam32, 000 # of steam

5300 tons per day16.024 mmbtu/hr16.024 mmbtu/hr16.024 mmbtu/hr870,400 tons/first 10-month of 200725 fpm25fpm

Page 240: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

179480 gal of gas150 cpm150 cpm150 cpm150 cpm0.0029 gr/dscf0.012 gr/dscf; 34.0 lbs/hr0.001 gr/dscf0.0068 gr/dscf; 0.027 lb/ton31.2 gal/hr23.1 gal/hr1100 mmBtu/hour1130 mmBtu/hour35 tons/hr60 sheets/min29.5 TPH220 TPH (will be derated)220 TPH (will be derated)

1350 lb/hr1350 lb/hr

111 TPH15.22 MM BTU/hr18.7 TPH18.7 TPH18.7 TPH11.02 TPH2.86 TPH11.02 TPH11.02 TPHmax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt rate

Page 241: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

max. melt ratemax. melt ratemax. melt rate11.2, 10.7, 3.6 TPH11.2, 10.7, 3.6 TPH11.2, 10.7, 3.6 TPH894 lb/hr1947.5 lbs steel/hr48.58 MM BTU/hr154.65 tons/day154.65 tons/day80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr80.46 lbs VOC/hr2687.1 gpm2687.1 gpm540,889.6 lbs/hr

621.9 mmBTU/hr

18.0 MMBtu/hr8.57 MMBtu/hrn/an/a153.0 mmBTU/hr153.0 mmBTU/hr

153.0 mmBTU/hr

153.0 mmBTU/hr

69.8 mmBTU/hrConfidentialN/AConfidentialConfidentialConfidential

161.75 TPH161.75 TPH

161.75 TPH161.75 TPH

Page 242: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3.18 TPH3.04 TPH

114.3 mmBTU/hr

147 tons/hr226 molds/hr40 tons/hr211 molds/hr257 molds/hr68.2 TPH69 TPH68.2 TPH69.2 TPH

69.2 TPH

see below

240.5 molds/hr

220.9 molds/hr

Page 243: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

189.8 molds/hr233.1 molds/hr

confidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidential

confidential

confidentialconfidential

confidentialconfidential

confidentialconfidentialconfidential

Page 244: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

confidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidentialconfidential

350 tons/hr

108.18 mmBTU/hrnot applicable20.38 mmBTU/hr

20.38 mmBTU/hr3747 lbs/hrsee belowsee belowsee belowsee below9552.4 lineal feet/hr9552.4 lineal feet/hr9480.3 lineal feet/hr9480.3 lineal feet/hr10885.7 pieces/hr10885.7 pieces/hr16320.8 lineal feet/hr16320.8 lineal feet/hrsee memosee memo7510 lineal feet/hr7510 lineal feet/hr8.12 gallons adhesion promoter/hr8.84 gallons adhesion promoter/hr8.12 gallons adhesion promoter/hr8.84 gallons adhesion promoter/hrsee belowsee belowsee below71.5 MMBtu/hr

Page 245: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

71.5 MMBtu/hr78 MMBtu/hr52.1 MMBtu/hr1900 lbs/hr83.97 MMBtu/hr83.97 MMBtu/hr83.97 MMBtu/hr83.97 MMBtu/hr27.2 lbs VOC/hr33.3 lbs VOC/hr1.43 tons/hr269.3 lbs/hr (RTO 1); 206.4 lbs/hr (RTO 2)16,374 lbs/hr16,374 lbs/hr45,619 lbs/hr65.7 tons/hr

57.9 tons/hr57.9 tons/hr

76,368 lbs/hr with 318 lbs/hr siloxane76,368 lbs/hr with 318 lbs/hr siloxane

61.58 MMBtu/hrnot applicablenot applicable600 lbs/hr600 lbs/hr99.7 tons/hr99.7 tons/hr255.5 MMBtu/hr255.5 MMBtu/hr247.2 MMBtu/hr31.5 tons/hr31.5 tons/hr

31.5 tons/hr31.5 tons/hr31.5 tons/hr

32 tons/hr

32.2 tons/hr32 tons/hr32 tons/hr32 tons/hr287.7 gpm287.7 gpm287.7 gpm287.7 gpm37 gallons glaze/hr77.1 mmBTU/hr

Page 246: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

77.1 mmBTU/hr77.1 mmBTU/hrNot applicable239.2 TPH239.2 TPH32.7 TPH145.17 lbs rubber/batch29.82 lbs rubber/batch98.7 lbs VOC/hr22.2 TPH

22.2 TPH

22.2 TPH31.6 TPH

31.0 TPH31.6 TPH

31.6 TPH31.6 TPH31.0 TPHlow load testinglow load testinglow load testinglow load testinglow load testing17.9 lbs/hr18.1 lbs/hr13.9 lbs/hr21.3 lbs/hr20.9 lbs/hr12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr

12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr

12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr

12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr12.67 ton glass/hr5.59 tons/hr5.59 tons/hr

Page 247: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3.478 tons/hr3.478 tons/hr2.77 tons/hr2.77 tons/hr2.77 tons/hr2.77 tons/hr2.77 tons/hr2.77 tons/hr2.77 tons/hr2.77 tons/hr7.8 tons/hr7.8 tons/hr7.8 tons/hr7.8 tons/hr7.8 tons/hr7.8 tons/hr7.8 tons/hr7.8 tons/hr4.0988 tons/hr4.0988 tons/hr

77.4 tons/day77.4 tons/day

77.4 tons/day77.4 tons/day77.4 tons/daymaximummaximummaximumnanana74.16 MSCFH29.96 mmbtu/hr

@ 37mmBtu/hr31.3 mmBTU/hrnanamaxmaxmaxmaxmaxmaxmaxmaxmaxmaxmax90% of max rate1311lbs/hr (normal)

Page 248: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

1311lbs/hr (normal)na?na?na?na?na?na?nanananananananananananananananananananananananananalow 78,188 lb/hr138,729 lb/hr steamnanananananana102.1 lb/hrsulfur prod is 86 LTPD40 mbpd fcc-gas oil feed40 mbpd fcc-gas oil feed40 mbpd fcc-gas oil feed

n/a280 tons/day92% of capacity

Page 249: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

92% of capacity90% of capacity

92% of capacity262-398 tphna25.6 tons draw/hr25.6 tons draw/hr20.3 tons/hr20.3 tons/hr

26.5 tons draw/hr23.88 tons draw/hr23.88 tons draw/hr23.88 tons draw/hr23.88 tons draw/hr23.88 tons draw/hr4348 SCFM4348 SCFM1001 SCFM3562 SCFM4730 SCFM38.85 lbs per hour39.7 lbs per hr for 3 hrs38 lbs per hr for 3 hrs38.8 lbs per hr41.2 lb/hr41.2 lb/hr40.8 lb/hr40.8 lb/hr127 TPH127 TPH

127 TPH127 TPHN/A120 carriers120 carriers600 lb/hr600 lb/hr2000 lb/hr2000 lb/hr2000 lb/hr2000 lb/hr4000 lb/hr4000 lb/hr4000 lb/hr4000 lb/hr4000 lb/hr

Page 250: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

4000 lb/hr600 lb/hr600 lb/hr4000 lb/hr4000 lb/hr4000 lb/hr4000 lb/hr820 lb/hr700 lb/hr820 lb/hr120 liters/hr

323 lb/hr323 lb/hr323 lb/hr0.5877 lb/hr1.03 lb/hr

142 TPH

142 TPH142 TPH142 TPH389,000 lb/hr steam flow372,000 pounds/nour steam flow350,000 pounds/nour steam flow146 MW150 MW317 tons per hour820 mw gross401 MW176 GMW(165 MW Net)400 MW566 million Btu/hour63.8 ton/hr5.16 ton/hr60.8 ton/hr213 MW211 MW210 MW213 MW215 MW40 TPH

Page 251: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

29.4 gal/hr29.4 gal/hr29.4 gal/hr29.4 gal/hr29.4 gal/hr58 tons per day6.05 tons/hour85 - 150 TPH192 tons/hour192 tons/hour192 tons/hour

192 tons/hour13 TPH13 TPH13 TPH13 TPH33 gal/hr33 gal/hr33 gal/hr

9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver

9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver

9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver

9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver9,478 oz gold, 16,654 oz silver629 million Btu/hour

629 million Btu/hour629 million Btu/hour629 million Btu/hour633 MW564 MW605 MW

Page 252: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

181 tons/hour

181 tons/hour181 tons/hour181 tons/hour

181 tons/hour

181 tons/hour181 tons/hour181 tons/hour317 Megawatts630 MW625 Megawatts189 MW218 Megawatts189 Megawatts186 MWApprox. 6 TPHApprox. 3 TPHApprox. 3.0 TPHApprox. 2.0 TPHApprox. 10 TPHApprox. 2.5 TPHApprox. 2.0 TPHApprox. 5 TPHApprox. 1.5 TPHApprox. 1.5 TPH267,106 lb al/day231,394 lb al/day267,106 lb al/day231,394 lb al/day267,106 lb al/day231,394 lb al/day267,106 lb al/day231,394 lb al/day5.12 tons AL/hour5.12 tons AL/hour5.12 tons AL/hour5.12 tons AL/hour5.12 tons AL/hour5.12 tons AL/hour5.12 tons AL/hour5.12 tons AL/hour5.4 tons al/hour5.4 tons al/hour5.4 tons al/hour5.4 tons al/hour383 TPH383 TPH

383 TPH

Page 253: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

383 TPH37.4 tons/hour41.5 tons/hour2.8 pounds/hour MBTT(67.2 lbs/day)2.8 pounds/hour MBTT(67.2 lbs/day)2.8 pounds/hour MBTT(67.2 lbs/day)2.8 pounds/hour MBTT(67.2 lbs/day)2.8 pounds/hour MBTT(67.2 lbs/day)2.8 pounds/hour MBTT(67.2 lbs/day)183 TPH290 tons/hour585 TPH196 TPH315 tons/hour61 TPH393 TPH315,481 sq. ft. per hour315,481 sq. ft. per hour315,481 sq. ft. per hour69.2 pounds/hour1601 SCFM1601 SCFM4,900 pounds/hour4,900 pounds/hour61 tons/hour291 ton/hour291 tons/hour291 ton/hour

291 tons/hour144 million Btu/hour56,000 cfm10,520 cfm72,000 cfm87.56 gal/hr, 96% Control87.56 gal/hr, 96% Control87.56 gal/hr, 96% Control87.56 gal/hr, 96% Control87.56 gal/hr, 96% Control87.56 gal/hr, 96% Control50,000cfm72,000 cfm291 million Btu/hour291 million Btu/hour291 million Btu/hour

291 million Btu/hour291 million Btu/hour362 million Btu/hour362 million Btu/hour362 million Btu/hour362 million Btu/hour

Page 254: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

362 million Btu/hour

3.5 TPH (average - 3 kilns)3.5 TPH (average - 3 kilns)2.5 tons (average of 2 kilns)2.5 tons (average of 2 kilns)5.8 TPH

5.8 TPH5.8 TPH

0.95 ton per hour400 tons/hour17 million Btu/Hour11 million Btu/million Btu heat input215 mw gross33.4 tph20,800 pounds/hourconfidentialconfidential

confidentialconfidential

confidentialconfidentialconfidential

confidentialconfidentialconfidential

confidentialconfidential

confidential

confidentialconfidential

confidentialconfidential

confidentialconfidentialconfidential276,870 gal/6 hr period238,491 gal/6 hr period13.72 Megawatts

Page 255: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

13.72 Megawatts28.2 Megawatts28.2 Megawatts28.2 Megawatts20.5 Megawatts20.5 Megawatts24.7 Megawatts24.7 Megawatts10,020 scfh

5689.0 mmbtu/hr156 MW156 MW156 MW156 MW123.2 MMBtu/hr0.0050 lb/MMBTU29.22 t/hr29.22 t/hr29.22 t/hr29.22 t/hr29.22 t/hr29.22 t/hr16.3 t/hr35.8 t/hr22.28 t/hr87.21 t/hr(WDC), 47.24 (CDC), 41.38 t/hr (EFDC)87.21 t/hr (WDC), 47.24 t/hr (CDC)22.87 T/hr25 t/hr87.21 t/hr35.88 t/hr87.21 t/hr (WDC), 47.24 t/hr (CDC), 41.38 t/hr (EFDC)118.53118.53118.53118.53see memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo belowsee memo below14 ML/PART AND 661 PARTS

52 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;92% OF TURBINE CAPACITY

59 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;95% OF TURBINE CAPACITY

Page 256: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

66 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;98% OF TURBINE CAPACITY

71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY

954 lb/hr331 TPH34 TPH55 TPH

83.6 TONS CLINKER / HR; MILL OFF

156 LB HR FEED TO KILN; RAW MILL OFF

88.0 TONS CLINKER / HR; MILL ON148 LB HR FEED TO KILN; RAW MILL ON

169 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT

169 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT

345 TPH345 TPH345 TPH

345 TPH100 FT/MIN W/ 41.4 GAL/HR APPLIED100 FT/MIN & 41.4 GAL/HR APPLIED94,424 GALLONS GAS LOADED109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR109 LB VOC APPLIED / HOUR214000 LB/HR CORN THROUGHPUT

Page 257: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

72 MMBTU/HR

58.71 MMBTU/HR

243 TPH

82,300 LB STEAM/HR

78,800 LB STEAM / HOUR665.3 MMBTU/HR heat input587 MMBTU/HR heat input570.9 MMBTU/HR heat input538 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT538 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT632.3 MMBTU/HR heat input590 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT590 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT626.3 MMBTU/HR heat input591 MMBTU/HR591 MMBTU/HR599 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT599 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT599 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT599 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT590.9 MMBTU/HR heat input585.1 mmBTU/HR585.1 mmBTU/HRSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTSSEE COMMENTS

Page 258: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

200,000 lbs/silo200,000 lbs/silo208 MW124,000 lbs of steam/hr121,500 lbs of steam/hr121,700 lbs of steam/hr

735 lbs/hour1050 lbs/hour (P001 and P002 combined)1050 lbs/hour (P001 and P002 combined)1050 lbs/hour (P001 and P002 combined)88.0 tons/hr1.32 TPH of product15.5 tons iron/hour2166 lbs/hr23.5 to 47.7 TPH23.5 to 47.7 TPH23.5 to 47.7 TPH23.5 to 47.7 TPH23.5 to 47.7 TPH23.5 to 47.7 TPH45.0 TPH23.5 to 47.7 TPH

23.5 to 47.7 TPH

2.5 dry sludge tons per hour241 tons/hour241 tons/hour241 tons/hour41.4 tons shale/hour241 tons/hour241 tons/hour241 tons/hour46.8 tons shale/hour to Kilnnear max - confidentialnear max - confidentialnear max - confidential

near max - confidential38,639 lbs/charge38,639 lbs/charge2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pc2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pc2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pc2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pc2.5 pc/hr; 96.25 lbs/pc850 KW

850 KW

Page 259: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

850 KW850 KW

850 KW

850 KW850 KW850 KW32.7 pounds paint used per hour32.7 pounds paint used per hour32.7 pounds paint used per hour231 TPH

180 tph

180 tph180 tph180 tph

~168,000 lb/hr steam 173 mmbtu~168,000 lb/hr steam 173 mmbtu

~168,000 lb/hr steam 173 mmbtu~170,000 lb/hr steam 177 mmbtu/hr~170,000 lb/hr steam 177 mmbtu~170,000 lb/hr steam 177 mmbtu

169,000 lb/hr steam

6814 SCFM73 MW73 MW74 MW74 MW68 MW72 MW80 MW79 MW224 TONS/HEAT (4 HEATS/ RUN)2 HEATS/RUN, 522 TONS PER RUN2 HEATS/RUN, 522 TONS PER RUN2 HEATS/RUN, 522 TONS PER RUN2 HEATS/RUN, 522 TONS PER RUN223 TONS/HEAT (4 HEATS/ RUN)253 TONS/HR223.5 TONS/HEAT (4 HEATS/ RUN)290 TONS/HR290 TPH224.6 TONS/HEAT (4 HEATS/ RUN)13.3 MMBTU/HR13.3 MMBTU/HR

Page 260: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

13.3 MMBTU/HR17.3 MMBTU/HR17.3 MMBTU/HR17.3 MMBTU/HR9.0 MMBTU/HR9.0 MMBTU/HR9.0 MMBTU/HR235 KPPH184,000 LB/HR STEAM, 223 MMBTU/HR184,000 LB/HR STEAM, 223 MMBTU/HR184,850 LB/HR STEAM, 230 MMBTU/HR24 MWSEE MEMO FIELD5.5 FT/MIN CONVEYER SPEED5.5 FT/MIN CONVEYER SPEED127 MMBTU/hr (See MEMO)145 MMBTU/HR (See MEMO)52 mmbtu/hr133 MMBTU/HR (See MEMO)5.6 MW5.6 MW

400 TPH

~1355 MW11,238 MMBTU/HR; 1413 MWSee MemoSee MemoSee MemoSee Memo237 MMBTU/HR235 MMBTU/HR425 MMBTU/HR94 MWSee MemoSee Memo167 MW99 MW97 MW (1153 MMBTU/HR)SEE MEMOSEE MEMO132 MW99 mw (1175 mmbtu/hr)134 MW OR 1357 MMBTU/HR20031 LB/HR4997 LB/HR8029 LB/HR22033 LB/HR

Page 261: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

5001 LB/HR5018 LB/HR2350 LB ADDED2350 LB ADDED2350 LB ADDED117 MMBTU/HR; 99 KPPH STEAM117 MMBTU/HR; 99 KPPH STEAM10508 LB THROUGHPUT7275 LB/HR7275 LB/HR24992 LB/HR5810 LB/HR9055 LB/HR84 KPPH STEAM79 KPPH STEAMNANA2654 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEEDRATE2650 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEEDRATESEE COMMENTS2700 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEEDRATE2701 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEEDRATESEE COMMENTS425 KPPH STEAM; 443 MMBTU/HR

425 KPPH STEAM; 443 MMBTU/HR2654 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEEDRATE2499 LB/HR OLEIC ACID FEEDRATE

67 MMBTU/HR (62 KPPH STEAM)47 mmbtu/hr47 mmbtu/hr1.35 MW138.8 MMBTU/HR135.8 MMBTU/HR136.1 MMBTU/HR; 99.2 MMBTU/HR DB139.5 MMBTU/HR; 99.3 MMBTU/HR DB11.6% RA (PPM) 9.5% RA (LB/MMBTU)3.11% RA (PPM) 0.85% RA (LB/MMBTU)1.86 MW1.35 MW8.1 tons/hour8.1 tons/hour

103000 GALLONS491 klb steam/hr491 klb steam/hr

Page 262: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

5000 SCFM5000 SCFM285 TPH285 TPH240 FPM274 FPM73 SHEETS PER MINUTE50 SHEETS PER MINUTE50 SHEETS PER MINUTE73 SHEETS PER MINUTE15 fpm15 fpm15 fpm15 fpm49 fpm49 fpm14.8 tphSEE MEMOSEE MEMO FIELDSEE MEMO FIELDSEE MEMO552 MW555 MW500 FPM LINE SPEED425 FPM LINE SPEED280 FPM LINE SPEED400 FPM LINE SPEED375 FPM LINE SPEED963 FPM248 KPPH140 KLBS/HR STEAM112 KLB/HR STEAM112 KLB/HR STEAM4 KETTLES RUNNING4 KETTLES OPERATING4 KETTLES OPERATING4 KETTLES OPERATING

4056 HP4056 HP

4046 HP4046 HP

484,461 GAL GAS IN 6-HOURS36.6 TPH36.6 TPHfixedfixed43.56 TPH338,000 gals of gasoline/6 hr test period44.7 MMBTU/HR (LOAD 98%)

Page 263: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

250 TPH

250 TPH

250 TPH250 TPH12.27 tons per hour13.58 tons per hour32 bricks per minute32 bricks per minute230,916 gallons of gasoline per 6 hours392,272 gallons of gasoline per 6 hours31.9 TPH28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND28,516 LBS/HR SILICA SAND17,343 lbs/hr17,343 lbs/hr17,912 lbs/hr54,760 lbs/hr sand (see memo)

16.1 tons/hr (107%)

142 tph142 tph142 tph93 lbs sulfur additions / 3 hours137 tph137 tph137 tph15000 lbs/hr of steam300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR

Page 264: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR300 POUNDS OF WASTE/HOUR755 ft/min288 TPH

288 TPH288 TPH288 TPHloaded gasoline31 tons/hr

20,000 POUNDS OF SALT/HOURSee Below

216 mmbtu216 mmbtu216 mmbtu

216 mmbtu13.29 pounds per hour

0.04 #/mmBtu0.026 #/mmBtu0.35 #/hr0.2467 #/mmBtutest not completed10,187 amps/hour

unit was in operationused mass balance to determine

Page 265: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

TESTED EMISSION RATE METHOD NUMBERN/A 5N/A 5N/A 5N/A 5N/A 5N/A 50.023 gr/DSCF 50.023 gr/DSCF 50.023 gr/DSCF 5N/A (Method 9) 26A0.0019 52.68 ppm 10

29292929292929

0.17 lb VOC/98" Trough; 0.21 lb VOC/120" Trou other13.71 lbs VOC/ Ton Resin other13.71 lbs VOC/ Ton Resin other13.71 lbs VOC/ Ton Resin other13.71 lbs VOC/ Ton Resin other13.71 lbs VOC/ Ton Resin other13.71 lbs VOC/ Ton Resin other105.1 lb/hr PM 5105.1 lb/hr PM 5105.1 lb/hr PM 50.09 lb/hr OC 25A0.09 lb/hr OC 25A0.09 lb/hr OC 25A0.09 lb/hr OC 25A0.09 lb/hr OC 25A0.09 lb/hr OC 25A0.02 inches of pressure drop 20414.8 lbs OC/hr as propane 25A66.9% OC destruction efficiency 25A66.9% OC destruction efficiency 25A66.9% OC destruction efficiency 25A0 9no VE outside building 220.00023 grain/DSCF 5D0 90 220.10 lb/hr 50% VE 90.30 lbs/hr 5no visible emissions 2298.0% DE 25A98.0% DE 25A98.0% DE 25A98.0% DE 25A

Page 266: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

98.0% DE 25A98.0% DE 25A98.0% DE 25A0.4 lb/hr (99.4% DRE) 180.02 lb/hr (89.9% DRE) 3160.4 lb/hr 100.002 lb/hr (99.7% DRE) 308NA 26NA 260.01 lb/hr 25A0.048 lb/hr 5

292929292929

0.013 lb/hr 1077

<0.0001 lb/hr 260.009 lb/hr 6

2929292929

<0.003 lb/hr 2677

0.029 lb/hr 50.11 lb/hr 100.01 lb/hr 25A

292929292977

0.50 lb/hr 6<0.002 lb/hr, >=95% 260.12 lb/hr 100.01 lb/hr 25A0.097 lb/hr 5

29otherother

0.46 lb/hr 3205.0 lbs/hr 100.21 lb/hr 32098.0% dre/113.8 ppm total HAP 320

otherother

Page 267: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.009 lb methanol/hr 3200.23 lb CO/hr 100.06 lb formaldehyde/hr 32099.9% DRE/6 ppm VOC outlet 320

other0.08 lb formaldehyde/hr 3200.03 lb methanol/hr 320

otherotherother

97.4% dre/12 ppm oc outlet 3201.03 lbs CO/hr 100.08 lb formaldehydehr 3200.03 lb methanol/hr 320

other96.4% DRE/12.2 ppm VOC outlet 3201.03 lbs CO/hr 10

other< 0.012 lb/hr 3200.005 lb/hr 32099.98% DRE/ (0.28 ppm formaldehyde) 3200.73 lb VOC/hr; 97.7% DRE 2599.5% DE 25A99.5% DE 25A99.5% DE 25A99.5% DE 25A99.5% DE 25A99.5% DE 25A48.52 25

77

.086 lbs/mmBtu 50.03lb/mmBtu/hr (See memo) 5N/A 5

77

.0067 lb/MMBtu 577

100% capture 20497.2% DRE 25A97.2% DRE 25A100% capture 20497.2% DRE 25A100% capture 20498.6% 25A100% capture 20498.6% DRE 25A100% capture 204100% capture 20498.6% DRE 25A16.9 lbs/hr 25

7E7E

Page 268: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

82.6 lbs/hr 1010.7 lbs/hr 64.7 lbs/hr; 0.02 gr/dscf 5less than 5% as 6-min avg 90.11 lb/hr 2020.074 lb/hr 50.08 lb/hr 50.19 lb/hr 20214.3 lb/hr 100.82 lb/hr (below detection limit) 66.77 lb/hr 51.78 lb/hr 2026.29 lb/hr 25A8.67 lb/hr 10NA 290.016 lb/mmbtu 50.03 lb/mmbtu 265% 9N/A RATA7 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 18

Page 269: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

7 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 257 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 267 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 187 lbs/hr @ 92.58 % destruction eff. 250.022 lb/hr 250.022 lb/hr 250.23 lb/hr 25A0.23 lb/hr 25A0.55 lb/hr 25A

Page 270: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.55 lb/hr 25A0.69 lb/hr 25A0.69 lb/hr 25A0.69 lb/hr 25A0.69 lb/hr 25A0.69 lb/hr 25A0.38 lb/hr 25A0.38 lb/hr 25A8.68 ppmvd CO @ 3%O2 1095% Destruction Efficiency 25N/A RATA0.09 lbs SO2/hr 617.11 lbs VOC/hr 25

77

0.03 gr/dscf 541.57 lbs CO/hr 1093.7 % DF 25A0.45 lbs/hr 50.53lbs/hr 2010.16 lbs/hr 50.16 lbs/hr 2010.221 lbs/hr 50.221 lbs/hr 2013.76 lbs/hr 2040.027 lb/mmBtu 50.0037 gr/dscf 5reduced formaldehyde by 91.7 % other75.5 % voc destruction efficiency 2575.5 % voc destruction efficiency 2575.5 % voc destruction efficiency 2575.5 % voc destruction efficiency 250.77 lb VOC/hr 25A

777777777777777777777

Page 271: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

77777

98.8% reduction other97.4% reduction other97.2% reduction other97.8% reduction other97.7% reduction other98.2% reduction other98.8% reduction other96.9% reduction other96.5% reduction other

77

1.9 lbs/hr 107

1.3 lbs/hr 107

8.952 lbs/hr 50.773 lb/hr or 0.599 ton/12-months 1099.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 2599.71% DE 250.0002 grain/dscf & 0.05 lb/hour 50.0001 grain/dscf & 0.04 lb/hour 2010.0003 grain/dscf and 0.07 lb/hour 50.00006 grain/dscf and 0.017 lb/hour 2010.00006 grain/dscf and 0.005 lb/hour 2010.0003 grain/dscf and 0.25 lb/hour 50.0002 grain/dscf & 0.03 lb/hour 2010.0001 grain/dscf & 0.03 lb/hour 50.126 (primary) 0.218 (secondary) RATA0.123 (primary) 0.040 (secondary) RATA100% ; 0.022 in H20 2044.73 lbs/hr; 99.9%MACT;99.8-T5 25A100% ; 0.052 in H20 2044.73 lbs/hr; 99.9%-MACT; 99.8%-T5 25A0.139 lbs/hr 50.090 lbs/hr 50.090 lbs/hr 50.0090 lbs/hr 56.57 lbs SO2/ton product 6C

Page 272: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

9.43 lbs/hr 56.57 lbs SO2/ton of product 6C9.43 lbs/hr 50.0092 gr/dscf 50.004 lb/mmBtu 50.009 lb/mmBtu 50.004 lb/mmBtu 50.025 lb/mmBtu 50.02 lb/mmBtu 50.034 lb/mmBtu 50.025 lb/mmBtu 50.32 lb/hr 25A0.17 lb/hr 25A1.12 lbs/hr 25A0.32 lb/hr 25A0.17 lb/hr 25A1.12 lbs/hr 25A0.32 lb/hr 25A0.17 lb/hr 25A1.12 lbs/hr 25A0.32 lb/hr 25A0.17 lb/hr 25A1.12 lbs/hr 25A0.32 lb/hr 25A0.17 lb/hr 25A1.12 lbs/hr 25A0.32 lb/hr 25A0.17 lb/hr 25A1.12 lbs/hr 25A7.3 ppm VOC 25A7.3 ppm VOC 25A

7777

0.009 lb/mmbtu 70.009 lb/mmbtu 740000 lbs/steam 260.052 lb/MM Btu 53.43E-06 lb/MM Btu other41000 lbs/steam 260.088 lb/MM Btu 53.37E-06 lb/MM Btu other

260.006 #/MMBTU 60.016 3/MMBTU 5

260% opacity (all were less than 5%) 90.14 lb nox/mmbtu 70.024 lb pe/mmbtu 50.113 lb co/mmbtu 100% opacity for all emission points except one 997.6% destruction 2496.3% overall efficiency 204

Page 273: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

2.72 mg/L VOC 25B98.23% DE 20498.82% CE 20499.09% CE 20494.85% DE, 93.73% overall 250.0029 gr/dscf 50.012 gr/dscf; 34.0 lbs/hr 50.001 gr/dscf 50.0068 gr/dscf; 0.027 lb/ton 599.39% destrustion 2497.02% destrustion 25A0.011 lb/mmBtu 50.01 lb/mmBtu 50.52 lbs/hr, 0.0023 gr/dscf 589.23 % overall efficiency 240.011 gr/dscf, 1.65 lbs/hr 50.038 gr/dscf 597.52 lbs/hr (w/ slag) 6

292929292929

0.00326 gr/dscf 50.019 ppm 26

290.085 gr/dscf 599.42% other2.66 lbs/hr (includes P901/P903 emissions) 549.86 lbs/hr 549.86 lbs/hr combined w/ P901, P027 50.0024 gr/dscf 50.0024 gr/dscf 50.0024 gr/dscf 50.0024 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0066 gr/dscf 5<0.0066 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0066 gr/dscf 5<0.0066 gr/dscf 5<0.0066 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0066 gr/dscf 5<0.0066 gr/dscf 5

Page 274: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0022 gr/dscf 5<0.0023 gr/dscf 5<0.0023 gr/dscf 5<0.0023 gr/dscf 599.9% control efficiency 2699.67% control efficiency, 0.011 #/hr HCl 260.019 lb/MM BTU 50.64 lbs/hr 826.6 lbs/ton sulfuric acid produced other98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A98.72% DRE 25A77.2 ppm, 0% excess oxygen, db 6< 0.02 lbs/hr; >=99.99% DRE 25A23.3 lbs/hr 5

7< 0.534 lbs/hr 10

7< 1.2 ppmv (db), corrected to 3% oxygen 10< 1.7 ppmv (db) corrected to 3% oxygen 10n/a 10n/a 100.009 lbs/mmBTU 50.017 lbs/mmBTU 10

77

0.009 lbs/mmBTU 57

0.017 lbs/mmBTU 107

0.011 lbs/mmBTU 54.35 lbs/hr 520.5 ft/sec (flare tip exit velocity) other98.3 lbs/hr 10<0.22 lb/hr, >99.9965% DRE 25A<0.23 lb/hr, >99.996% DRE 25A

7E0.04 lbs/ton asphalt 250.0075 lbs/ton asphalt 6

7E0.003 lbs/ton asphalt; 0.40 lbs/hr 50.011 lbs/ton asphalt 10

Page 275: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.0021 grains/dscf 50.0021 grains/dscf 5

777

0.13 lbs/mmBTU 57

< 38.7 lbs/hr; < 0.204 gr/dscf 2011.17 lbs/hr 50.70 lbs/hr 56.5 lbs/hr 53.2 lbs/hr 581.0 lbs/hr 103.9 lbs/hr 25A0.0 lbs/hr 60.021 lbs/hr 12

77

4.89 lbs/hr 52929

0.0031 gr/dscf 5292929292929292929

see below 5292929292929292929292929292929292929292929

see below 5

Page 276: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

292929292929292929292929292929292929

0.00162 gr/dscf 5see below 5

2929292929292929292929292929292929

1.41 lbs/hr 50.34 lbs/hr 50.34 lbs/hr 50.0025 lbs/hr 50.37 lbs/hr 6

71.66 lbs/hr 10

70.50 lbs/hr as carbon 25A0.87 lbs/hr 5

71.66 lbs/hr 100.37 lbs/hr 6

70.50 lbs/hr as carbon 25A0.30 lbs/hr 61.68 lbs/hr 5

Page 277: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

6.0 lbs/hr 52.8 lbs/hr 53.9 lbs/hr 55.0 lbs/hr 53.4 lbs/hr 53.0 lbs/hr 102.2 lbs/ton glass pulled 51.8 lbs/ton glass pulled 52.7 lbs/ton glass pulled 50.07 lbs/ton glass pulled 50.04 lbs/ton glass pulled 53.6 lbs/hr 52.3 lbs/hr 52.8 lbs/hr 50.8 lbs/hr 50.2 lbs/hr 5

7777

8.8 lbs/hr; 0.03 gr/dscf 577

0.31 lbs/hr 100% opacity 9<0.045 lbs/hr 10

77

< 0.045 lbs/hr 100.46 lbs/hr (stack); 0.304 lbs/100 lbs beads; 9 25A< 0.749 lbs/hr; < 0.0019 gr/dscf 5< 3.44 lbs/hr; < 0.0046 gr/dscf 201< 1.05 lbs/hr; < 0.0020 gr/dscf 5< 3.95 lbs/hr; < 0.0049 gr/dscf 201< 0.69 lbs/hr; < 0.0013 gr/dscf 202< 1.45 lbs/hr; < 0.0027 gr/dscf 5< 0.58 lbs/hr; < 0.0015 gr/dscf 202< 1.06 lbs/hr; < 0.0027 gr/dscf 5< 0.57 lbs/hr; < 0.0014 gr/dscf 202< 1.08 lbs/hr; < 0.0026 gr/dscf 5< 0.56 lbs/hr; < 0.0016 gr/dscf 202< 0.92 lbs/hr; < 0.0027 gr/dscf 5< 0.39 lbs/hr; < 0.00080 gr/dscf 5< 0.58 lbs/hr; < 0.0012 gr/dscf 202< 0.25 lbs/hr; < 0.00074 gr/dscf 50.37 lbs/hr; 0.0011 gr/dscf 20295.7% control efficiency 20497.6% destruction and removal efficiency 25A95.7% control efficiency 20497.6% destruction and removal efficiency 25A0.66 lbs/gallon coating solids 250.66 lbs/gallon coating solids 25see below 25A0.14 lb/MMBtu 5

Page 278: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.14 lb/MMBtu 50.04 lb/MMBtu 50.049 lb/MMBtu 51.18 lbs/hr 50.008462 lbs/MMBtu 50.0000042 lbs/MMBtu 290.008462 lbs/MMBtu 50.0000042 lbs/MMBtu 293.88 lbs/hr, 93.94% DRE 253.88 lbs/hr, 93.94% DRE 252.81 lbs/hr (as ethanol) 20498.25% DRE (RTO1), 99.5% DRE (RTO 2) 25A7.845 lbs/hr 68.58 lbs/hr 60.24 lbs/hr 55.3 lbs/hr 6

71.40 lbs/hr 6140.53 lbs/hr 10

72.38 lbs/hr; 7.0 lbs/hr (PM10) 52.38 lbs/hr 25A

7E7E

12.79 lbs/hr 103 min 51 sec/2 hr 2248.4 ft/sec other0.021 lbs/hr; 0.0033 gr/dscf, 0.0036 lbs/100 lbs 58.4x10-7 lbs/hr; 1.28x10-4 gr/1000 dscf 290.000904 lbs/hr; 0.00000767 gr/dscf 292.09 lbs/hr; 0.0177 gr/dscf 50.05 lb/MMBtu 50.008 lb/MMBtu 26A0.00000263 lb/MMBtu other28.4 lbs/hr; 1.02 lbs/ton stone feed 53.44 lbs/hr; 0.012 gr/dscf 202

7E7E

< 0.17 lbs/hr (as propane) 25A6.4 lbs/hr 100.13 lbs/ton product 6C

7E0.055 lbs/hr (as propane) 25A

7E3.4 lbs/ton product 6C1.06 lbs/hr 20219.3 lbs/hr; 0.70 lbs/ton stone feed 53.29 lbs/hr 100.000704 lbs/hr 80.33 lbs/hr as propane 250.00506 lbs/hr other0.00501 lbs/hr 260.37 lbs/hr 50.0000075 lbs/mmBTU 29

Page 279: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.036 lbs/mmBTU 260.05 lbs/mmBTU 5See memo other0.021 gr/dscf 50.000245 lbs/ton asphalt produced 65.2 ppmv; < 3.1 lbs/hr 26Asee memo 15see memo 150.38 lbs/hr; 98.6% control eficiency 25A3.65 lbs/hr 10

70.43 lbs/hr 5

72.87 lbs/hr 25A26.5 lbs/hr 10

7E1.04 lbs/hr 52.74 lbs/hr (as VOC); 97.7% DRE 25A

7E7E7E

2.74 lbs/hr (as VOC); 97.7% DRE 25A26.5 lbs/hr 101.04 lbs/hr 51.36 lbs/hr; 96.49% DRE 25A1.36 lbs/hr; 96.49% DRE 25A1.36 lbs/hr; 96.49% DRE 25A1.36 lbs/hr; 96.49% DRE 25A1.36 lbs/hr; 96.49% DRE 25A2.5 lbs/hr; 97.4% DRE 252.5 lbs/hr; 97.4% DRE 252.5 lbs/hr; 97.4% DRE 252.5 lbs/hr; 97.4% DRE 252.5 lbs/hr; 97.4% DRE 250.79 lbs/ton 2020.6 lbs/hr 5

7E7E

0.003 lb/ton 101.76 lb/ton 6C0.02 lb/ton 25A0 % opacity 90.0726 lbs/ton 13A

7E0.6 lbs/hr 50.0726 lbs/ton 13A0.79 lbs/ton 2020.02 lb/ton 25A

7E1.76 lb/ton 6C0.003 lb/ton 100 % opacity 9.0014198 lbs/hr 5.0014809 lbs/hr 12

Page 280: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

.0034796 lbs/hr 5

.0004085 lbs/hr 12

.0017748 lbs/hr 12

.0022194 lbs/hr 5

.0017748 lbs/hr 12

.0022194 lbs/hr 5

.0017748 lbs/hr 12

.0022194 lbs/hr 5

.0017748 lbs/hr 12

.0022194 lbs/hr 50.0254075 lbs/hr 50.0004581 gr/dscf 120.0254075 lbs/hr 50.0004581 gr/dscf 120.0004581 gr/dscf 120.0254075 lbs/hr 50.0004581 gr/dscf 120.0254075 lbs/hr 5.0004549 lbs/hr 5.0003659 lbs/hr 12

7Eavg 5% opacity 92.25 lb/hr 5

7E2.42 lb/hr 2020.03 lb/hr 104.91 lb/hr 6C99.3 % control efficiency 2599.3 % control efficiency 25Aless than 0.22 lb/hr 59.69% of applicable standard RATA5.11% of applicable standard RATA3.52% of applicable standard RATA15.79% of RM RATAless than 0.031 lb co/hr 10

7E7E

<1.5 ppmv 104.8 ppmv db @ 3% O2 100.46 ppmv db @ 3% O2 260.09 ppmv db @ 3% O2 2612.97 lb/hr as carbon 250.37 lb/hr 1039.2 ppmvd methane other18.3 ppmvd as carbon 25A0.0092 lb/hr as carbon other<0.066 lb/hr as carbon 25<0.066 lb/hr as carbon 250.0092 lb/hr as carbon other18.3 ppmvd as carbon 25A0.0082 lb/hr as carbon other5.37 lb/hr as carbon 25under 15% 94.16 % relative accuracy 6C

Page 281: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

7E7E

48.03% relative accuracy 101.8% based on applicable standard of 10% 151.8% based on applicable standard of 10% 151.8% based on applicable standard of 10% 151.8% based on applicable standard of 10% 151.8% based on applicable standard of 10% 151.8% based on applicable standard of 10% 151.7 % based on 10% standard 154.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA4.4% of 160 ppm H2S (o.10 grains/dcsf) RATA6.5% of 10% appl standard RATA6.5% of 10% appl standard RATA2.3 % based on 20% Appl standard 151.7 % based on 10% applicable standard 150.0 min/120 min. 220.0 min/120 min. 220.0 min/120 min. 220.0 min/120 min. 220.0 min/120 min. 223.60% ppmv db or the RM RATA3.87 % of the RM of NOX RATA10.2% based on the mean reference method RATAsee notes 26Asee notes 26Asee notes 26Asee notes 26Asee notes 26Ana RATA5.23 RATA67.49 ppmv db O2 free RATA-0.01% O2 relative accuracy other1.4 % relative accuracy 10-0.01% O2 relative accuracy RATA

7E7E

SO2 calculated emission rate RA, %=2.82 6CSO2 calculated emission rate RA,, %=5.17 6C17.93 ppmv other

Page 282: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

77

0.363 lb/hr 3080.046 lb/hr 308

77

7.36 ppmv other500 tph 9max 92.57 lbs/hr H2SO4 830.7393 lb/hr PM 51.46 lbs/hr H2SO4 824.78 lbs /hr 5

77

16.57 % Rata (20 allowble) 108.85 lbs/hr 818.9 lb/hr PM 51.69 lb/hr SO2 6C0.028 lb/hr VOC as propane 25A5.8 % 998.4% DRE 25A98.4% DRE 25A99.1% DRE 25A97.5% DRE 25A96.3% DRE 25A96.87 % DRE 25A61.14% Capture and Control 20483.8% Capture and Control 20496.87% DRE 25A97.3 % DRE 25A88.6 Capture % Control Efficiency 20486.1 Capture % Control Efficiency 20497.3 % DRE 25A3.8 lb/hr 2512.3 lb/hr 10

77

1.22 lb/hr 59.3 lb/hr 60.007 gr/dscf 55.5 % capture 20498.1 % DRE 25A0.51 lb/hr 50.033 lb/hr 120.0003 lb/hr 120.01 lb/hr 50.01 lb/hr 50.0007 lb/hr 120.0004 lb/hr 120.02 lb/hr 50.0004 lb/hr 120.04 lb/hr 50.0034 lb/hr 12

Page 283: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.25 lb/hr 50.0017 lb/hr 120.07 lb/hr 50.0011 lb/hr 120.14 lb/hr 50.02 lb/hr 120.02 lb/hr 50.04 lb/hr 50.09 lb/hr 50.09 lb/hr 50.45 lb.hr 10

77

2.03E-6 lbs/lb 3160.09 lb/hr 25A4.36E-6 lbs/lb other90.0 lb/hr 204110.0 lb/hr 204

7777

10.8 pounds/hour 2577

15.4 pounds/hour 60.040 gr/dscf 513.3 pounds/hour 100.061 lb/million Btu heat input 50.177 pound per million Btu 50.048 pound per million Btu 50.041 lb/million Btu heat input 50.047 pound/million Btu 50%, 3-min avg 90.10 lb/mmbtu 0.038 lb/mmbtu 50.033 pound/million Btu 50.064 lb/million Btu heat input 50.038 pound/million Btu 50.061 pound particulate/million Btu 50.005 gr/dscf, 2.95 lb/hr 50.005 gr/dscf, 2.95 lb/hr 50.005 gr/dscf, 2.95 lb/hr 50.048 pound/million Btu 50.034 pound/million Btu 50.031 pound/million Btu 50.048 pound/million Btu 50.02 pound/million Btu 53.2 pounds/hour 5

777777

Page 284: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

91.89% overall eff., 5.84 pounds/hour 25A91.89% overall eff., 5.84 pounds/hour 25A91.89% overall eff., 5.84 pounds/hour 25A91.89% overall eff., 5.84 pounds/hour 25A91.89% overall eff., 5.84 pounds/hour 25A0.008 gr/dscf 51.92 pounds HF/hour 26A6% Opacity 91.6 pounds/hour 6C20.3 pounds/hour 104.8 pounds/hour 25

7E7E

0.017 gr/dscf 50.01 gr/dscf(IAC), 0.006 gr/dscf(Wheelabrator) 50.001 gr/dscf 50.0008 gr/dscf 2010.86 pounds/hour 62.4 lb/hr; 98.6% dest. 242.4 lb/hr; 98.6% dest. 242.4 lb/hr; 98.6% dest. 24

77

98.5% Control Efficiency 2695.5% Control Efficiency 695.5% Control Efficiency 698.5% Control Efficiency 26

7777

95.5% Control Efficiency 698.5% Control Efficiency 2698.5% Control Efficiency 2695.5% Control Efficiency 6

777

95.5% Control Efficiency 698.5% Control Efficiency 26

777

98.5% Control Efficiency 2695.5% Control Efficiency 60.008 pound/million Btu 10

77

0.003 pound/million Btu 25A0.003 pound/million Btu 50% 90.047 pound/million Btu heat input 50.035 pound/million Btu heat input 50.028 pound/million Btu heat input 5

Page 285: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

73.73 pounds/hour 25A

71.54 pounds/hour (0.40 PM10) 544.9 pounds/hour 109.39 pounds/hour 6

72.31 pounds/hour 25A

70.65 pounds/hour 2010.00025 pounds/hour 1222.81 pounds/hour 60.005 lb/million Btu heat input 50.007 lb/million Btu 50.013 lb/million Btu heat input 50.025 lb/million Btu 50.013 lb/million Btu heat input 50.009 lb/million Btu heat input 50.008 lb/million Btu 50.14 pounds per hour, 0.003 gr/dscf 51.24 pounds per hour 50.47 pounds per hour 50.83 pounds per hour 50.41pounds per hour 50.15 pounds per hour, 0.002 gr/dscf 50.15 pounds per hour 50.067 pounds per hour 50.12 pounds per hour, 0.001 gr/dscf 50.251pounds per hour, 0.001 gr/dscf 50.102 lb f/ton al produced other0.287 lb f/ton al produced other0.102 lb f/ton al produced other0.287 lb f/ton al produced other0.102 lb f/ton al produced other0.287 lb f/ton al produced other0.102 lb f/ton al produced other0.287 lb f/ton al produced other0.5051 lb f/ton al produced other0.3129 lb f/ton al produced other0.5051 lb f/ton al produced other0.3129 lb f/ton al produced other0.5051 lb f/ton al produced other0.3129 lb f/ton al produced other0.5051 lb f/ton al produced other0.3129 lb f/ton al produced other0.099 lb f/ton al produced other0.0423 lb f/ton al produced other0.099 lb f/ton al produced other0.0423 lb f/ton al produced other64.5 pounds/hour 1018.8 pounds/hour 25

77

28.6 pound/hour 6

Page 286: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.007 grains/dscf 523.2 lb/hr 732.1 lb/hr 70.003 gr/dscf 50% Opacity 90.097 pounds VOC/hour(0.4 tons/year) 25A0.007 gr/dscf 50.081 pounds VOC/hour(0.4 tons/year) 25A0% Opacity 90% 910% Opacity 910% Opacity, 5% Opacity 90% opacity 95% Opacity 91% opacity as a 6-minute average 95% (as a 6-minute average) 926.8 pounds/hour, 93% control eff. 2526.8 pounds/hour, 93% control eff. 2526.8 pounds/hour, 93% control eff. 259.9 pounds/hour 25No VEs 2219.73 MJ/scm, 33.98 fps other2.57 pounds/hour 250.56 pounds/hour 50.01 grams/dry standard cubic meter 50.82 pound/hour 672.2 pounds/hour 100.007 grain/dscf 5

7E7E

15.5 pounds/hour 250.044 pound/million Btu 50.002 gr/dscf 50.003 gr/dscf 50.004 gr/dscf 510.8 lbs VOC/hour 25A10.8 lbs VOC/hour 25A10.8 lbs VOC/hour 25A10.8 lbs VOC/hour 25A10.8 lbs VOC/hour 25A10.8 lbs VOC/hour 25A0.003 gr/dscf 50.003 gr/dscf 50.24 lb/million Btu 100.016 lb/million Btu 80.032 lb/million Btu 5

77

0.009 lb/million Btu 25A0.0 lb/million Btu 60.0 lb/million Btu 60.38 lb/million Btu 100.007 lb/million Btu 25A0.008 lb/million Btu 8

Page 287: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.010 lb/million Btu 577

1.39 lb/hr 5186.25 lbs/hr 6C79.61 lbs/hr 6C18.04 lbs/hr 531.0 pounds/hour 6C

7E10.7 pounds/hour 521.2 pounds/hour 10

7E0% Opacity 9crusher-6.6%, conveyors-0% 90.353 lb/million Btu 50.315 pound/million Btu 50.057 lb/mmbtu 50%, 3-min avg 97.4 lb/hr(24 hr avg), 97% Dest. Eff. 25A0.17 pounds/hour 56.4 pounds/hour 25

7E7E7E

0.17 pounds/hour 56.4 pounds/hour 25

7E5.76 pounds/hour 525.3 pounds/hour 10288.3 pounds/hour 6

7E7E

1.2 pounds/hour 25A1.2 pounds/hour 25A25.3 pounds/hour 10

7E5.76 pounds/hour 5288.3 pounds/hour 6

7E79.8 pounds/hour 6

7E0.0 pounds/hour 100.0 pounds/hour 25A

7E2.08 pounds/hour 579.8 pounds/hour 6

7E7E

0.0 pounds/hour 100.0 pounds/hour 25A2.08 pounds/hour 50.000255 lb VOC/1000 gal, 0.03 mg/l 25B0.288 lb VOC/1000 gal, 3.75 mg/l 25B5.62 pounds/hour 5

Page 288: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0% opacity as a 6-minute average 912% opacity as a 6-minute average 919.58 pounds/hour 5N/A 297.8 pounds/hour 50% opacity as a 6-minute average 912% opacity as a 6-minute average 921.9 pounds/hour 5<0.036 pounds per hour 10

77

0.0282 lbs/MMBtu 5NA RATANA RATANA RATANA RATA0.0012 lb/MMBtu 6C0.11 lb/MMBTU 50.8 lb/hr 50.8 lb/hr 50.8 lb/hr 50.8 lb/hr 50.8 lb/hr 50.8 lb/hr 50.28 lb/hr 50.002 gr/dscf 517.54 lb/hr 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 50.0044 gr/dscf 50.0044 gr/dscf 50.0044 gr/dscf 50.0044 gr/dscf 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 5see memo below 590.6% RE; 0.11 LB/HR C3H8 25A

7E7E

1.05 LB CO/HR 107E

0.85 LB CO/HR 107E

Page 289: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

7E7E

0.57 LB CO/HR 107E

0.65 LB CO/HR 107E

0.063 lb/hr, 97.17% 25A0.004 GR/DSCF; 0.06 LB/HR 50.004 GR/DSCF; 0.035 LB/HR 50.001 GR/DSCF; 0.19 LB/HR 5

7777

2.6 LB SO2/TON CLINKER 62323

0.02 LB PE/TON KILN FEED 52323

1.9 LB SO2/TON CLINKER 60.02 LB PE/TON KILN FEED 5

232323237E7E

1.4 LB SO2/MMBTU HEAT INPUT 67E

0.01 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT 57E7E7E

0.01 GR/DSCF 514.0 LB SO2/HR 67.3 LB AS PROPANE/HR 25

7E7E

29.6 LB CO/HR 100.61 LB/HR AS COATING; 99% DE 2040.61 LB/HR AS COATING; 99% DE 25A0.08 MG/L as propane; <0.01 lb/hr; 99.9 RE 25B0.92 LB VOC / HOUR;85% OVERALL REMOVE250.92 LB VOC / HR 250.92 LB VOC/HR 250.92 LB VOC/HR 250.92 LB VOC/ HR 250.92 LB VOC / HOUR 250.92 LB VOC/ HOUR 250.92 LB VOC / HOUR 250.92 LB VOC/ HOUR 250.92 LB VOC/ HOUR 250.12 LB /HR PE 5

Page 290: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

6.24 LB/HR CO 107E7E7E

1.96 LB/HR CO 107E

7.11 LB/HR 10777E

0.06 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT 57E7E7E

0.02 LB PE/ MMBTU HEAT INPUT 50.009 lb/MMBTU cond PE 2020.012 lb/MMBTU cond PE 2020.011 lb/MMBTU cond PE 2020.03 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT 51.3 LB SO2/MMBTU HEAT INPUT 60.010 lb/MMBTU cond PE 2021.2 LB SO2/MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT 60.02 LB PE/MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT 50.009 lb/MMBTU cond PE 2020.02 LB PE/ MMBTU HEAT INPUT 51.2 LB PE/ MMBTU HEAT INPUT 61.2 LB SO2/MMBTU HEAT INPUT 60.04 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT 50.02 PE/MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT 51.3 LB SO2/MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT 60.009 lb/MMBTU cond PE 2020.025 PE/MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT 51.4 LB SO2/MMBTU ACTUAL HEAT INPUT 697.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A97.8%DE; 0.16LB/HR TNMHC AS CH4 25A

Page 291: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.8 lb/hour 51.0 lb/hour 50.046 lb/mmBtu 50.074 lb/mmbtu 50.049 lb/mmbtu 50.074 lb/mmbtu 5

77

0.063 lbs OC/hour 25A0.054 lb/hour (P001 and P002 combined) 52.46 lbs/hour 250.054 lb/hour (P001 and P002 combined) 50.27 lbs/hr 2623.08 lb/hr 250.0033 gr/dscf 50.0031 grains/dscf 51.12 lbs/hr 50.004 lbs/hr 2979.58 lbs/hr 103.70 lbs/hr 18<0.004 lbs/hr 290% opacity 90.4 lbs/hr 100% opacity 9

77

16.8 lbs/hr 62323

0.044 lb/100 pounds of dry material charged 50.0076 gr/dscf 50% opacity as a 3-minute average 90% opacity as a 3-minute average 95.34 lbs/hour of particulate emissions 50% opacity as a 6-minute average 90% opacity as a 3-minute average 90% opacity as a 3-minute average 939.20 lbs/hour of particulate emissions 50.016 lb/hr 53.91 lbs/hour 100% opacity 9

7E7E

0.013 lb/hour 6C0.001 lb/hr pb 120.70 lbs/hr pe; 0.0013 grain/dscf 523.08 lbs/hr 2523.08 lbs/hr 2523.08 lbs/hr 2523.08 lbs/hr 2523.08 lbs/hr 250.009 lb/hr 5

7E12.5 ppm 25A

Page 292: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

7E7.70 lb/hr 100.05 lb/hr 6C

7E6.72 lb/hr 10

7E0.01 lb/hr 6C10.1 ppm 25A0.007 lb/hr 50.24 lb VOC/hr see 25A3.32 lb VOC/hr (fugitive) 243.32 lb VOC/hr (fugitive) 2041.67% opacity as a six-minute average 9

70.09 lb/hr 6

7360.4 lb/hr 569.1 lb/hr 107.9 lb/hr 25

70.0189 lb/mmbtu 50.103 lb/mmbtu - 19.0 lb/hr 26

71.83E-06 lb/mmbtu - 9.05E-07 gr/dscf 29See memo 54.51E-06 lb/mmbtu - 2.32E-06 gr/dscf 290.121 lb/mmbtu - 20.6 lb/hr 26

77

0.004 lb/mmBtu AND 0.002 gr/acf 57E7E

81.9% OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY 24ASEE COMMENTS RATASEE COMMENTS RATASEE COMMENTS RATASEE COMMENTS RATASEE COMMENTS RATASEE COMMENTS RATASEE COMMENTS RATASEE COMMENTS RATA0.04 GR/DSCF 59.7% AS 3 MIN AVG 90.0017 GR/DSCF 59.2% AS 3 MIN AVG 90.0014 GR/DSCF 50.05 GR/DSCF 55.72 LB/HR 50.04 GR/DSCF 52.16 LB/HR 514.0 PPM 260.03 GR/DSCF 5<5% THROUGHOUT TEST 90.13 LB/MMBTU 5

Page 293: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.30 LB/MMBTU 10LESS THAN 8% OPACITY AS 6-MIN AVG 90.44 LB/MMBTU 100.19 LB/MMBTU 50.06 LB/MMBTU 10LESS THAN 5% OPACITY AS 6-MIN AVG 90.12 LB/MMBTU 5SEE MEMO RATA0.017 LB/MMBTU PM; 0.036 LB/MMBTU TOTA 50.0% 911.01 LB/HR 100.0447 LB/MMBTU 5SEE MEMO FIELD RATA1.34 LB/HR 53.24 LB/HR 2020.075 lb/mmbtu 50.083 lb/mmbtu 54.05%, 2.75% RA RATA0.054 lb/mmbtu 50.10 LB/HR; 99.6% CONTROL 100.11 LB/HR; 99.6% CONTROL 10

7777

0% OPACITY 97777

SEE MEMO RATA0.020 MMBTU/HR 5See Memo RATASee Memo RATASee Memo RATASee Memo RATASee Memo RATASee Memo RATASee Memo RATASEE MEMO RATASee Memo RATASee Memo RATASee Memo otherSEE MEMO RATA0.074 LB/MMBTU 5SEE MEMO RATASEE MEMO RATASEE MEMO RATA0.078 lb/MMBTU 50.069 lb/MMBTU 53.52 LB/HR and 99.8% CE 53.52 LB/HR and 99.8% CE 53.52 LB/HR and 99.8% CE 53.52 LB/HR and 96.1% CE 5

Page 294: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

3.52 LB/HR and 96.1% CE 53.52 LB/HR and 96.1% CE 53.52 LB/HR and 100.0% CE 53.52 LB/HR and 100.0% CE 53.52 LB/HR and 100.0% CE 50.049 LB/MMBTU 100.0038 LB/MMBTU 53.52 LB/HR and 99.8% CE 50.29 LB/HR PM 50.95 LB/HR VOC 25A69% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 569% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 569% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 5SEE MEMO RATA>99.9% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 18>99.86% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 18>99.86% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 181.18 LB/HR TGNMOC 250.95 LB/HR TGNMOC 25SEE COMMENTS RATA1.48 LB/HR TGNMOC 256.08 LB/HR TGNMOC 25SEE COMMENTS RATA0.944 LB/MMBTU 6

7E7E

0.025 LB/MMBTU 52.93 LB/HR TGNMOC 252.61 LB/HR TGNMOC 25

otherother

1.19 LB/MMBTU 60.1650 lb/mmbtu 58.99 lb/hr 260.80 LB/HR; 87.1% DRE 100.46 LB/HR; 89.8% DE 100.14 LB/HR; 98.4% DE 100.76 LB/HR; 99.2% DE 100.14 LB/HR; 99.9% DE 10>50% LOAD RATA>50% LOAD RATA89.0% DRE 1090.1% DRE 100.94 lb/ton sludge 53.10 lb/hr 25A

29297E7E

3.51 MG/L 240.03 LB/MMBTU 50.96 LB/MMBTU 6

7E7E

Page 295: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

501.5 Btu/scf and tip velocity 33.3 ft/sec other12 SEC OF VE IN 2 HR PERIOD 2219.4 LB/HR 100.5 LB/HR 683.6% CAPTURE EFFICIENCY 25A98.0% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY 25A98.8% OVERALL CONTROL 25A99.0% OVERALL CONTROL 25A99.0% OVERALL CONTROL 2599.0% OVERALL CONTROL 2597.5% DE 2596.9% CE 20497.5% DE 2596.9% CE 20496.9% CE 20497.5% DE 250.9 lb/hr & 0.8 lb/hr = 1.71 lb/hr 5SEE MEMO RATASEE MEMO FIELD RATASEE MEMO FIELD RATASEE MEMO RATASEE MEMO other0.016 LB/MMBTU 598.3% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 2598.3% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 2598.8% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 2598.8% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 2598.8% CONTROL EFFICIENCY 250.1 LB/HR, 96%DE 25SEE MEMO FIELD RATASEE MEMO BELOW RATASEE MEMO BELOW RATA5.9 PPM @ 3%O2 10N/A (SEE MEMO) 24N/A (SEE MEMO) 24N/A (SEE MEMO) 24N/A (SEE MEMO) 24

70.43G/HP-HR 3.86 LB/HR 25A1.81 G/HP-HR 16.20 LB/HR 10

72.30 G/HP-HR 20.52 LB/HR 100.78 G/HP-HR 6.99 LB/HR 25A

77

1.33 MG/L GASOLINE LOADED 240.45 LB/HR 52.27 LB/HR 25A0.43 lb/hr 3086.55lb/hr as ethanol 25A0.066 LB/HR 0.29 TPY 59.70 mg voc / liter of gasoline 241.48 LB/HR 10

20

Page 296: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

2010.8 LB/HR 25

7E1.09 LB/HR 6

7E94.7 LB/HR 100.040 GR/DSCF; 10.9 LB/HR 50.005 lbs/hr 50.005 lbs/hr 50.820 lbs/hr 50.433 lbs/hr 53.49 mg VOC per liter of gasoline loaded 25B0.88 mg OC per liter of gasoline loaded 25B0.98 LBS/HR OUTLET, 310 LBS/HR INLET 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 54.48 LBS/HR PE 50.06 lb/hr CPM 2020.013 lb/hr PE 5D0.032 lb/hr DMIPA 182.27 lbs/hr PE 5D

29292929292929292929

1.85 lbs/hr PE 5D29

1.55 lb/hr 2022.2% 93.92 lb/hr 5190 lbs / 3 hr 6C0.00131 grains/dscf 2010.60 lb/hr 50% 90.284 lbs/mmbtu 50.041 PPM CORRECTED TO 7% OXYGEN 26A4.73 PPM CORRECTED TO 7% OXYGEN 105.91 E-6 POUND/HOUR 292.66 E-7 POUND/HOUR 290.0122 GRAIN/1000 DSCF CORRECTED TO 29

Page 297: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

0.1919 GRAIN/1000 DSCF CORRECTED TO 7 290.0263 GRAINS/DSCF 50% OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE 90.0049 GRAIN/1000 DSCF CORRECTED TO 293.83 E-5 POUND/HOUR 293.46 E-5 POUND PER HOUR 290.030 lb/hr 534.97 lbs SO2/hr 6

77

95.23 lbs/hr 100.014 gr/dscf 538.44 lbs/hr 250.78 lbs/hr 25B0.90 lbs/hr 5

2323

0.03 GRAM/DSCM 5See Below RATA

2677

1.6 percent 94.77 lb/hr 100.158 lb/mmbtu 5

260.9743 lb/mmbtu 6132 mmBtu 10

7E7E

133 mmBtu 5133 mmBtu 8133 mmBtu 25A133 mmBtu 6Ctest not completed 50.002 mg/dscm chromium 306A

2626

1 leak noted 2198.6 percent destruciton 25

Page 298: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

POLLUTANTS RESULTS CONFORMAUDITPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INC NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INC NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INC NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INC NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INC NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INC NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA NHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNickel PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YChromium PASS NA YCadmium PASS NA YArsenic PASS NA YBeryllium PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons FAIL NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA NFugitive Emissions PASS NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA NVisible Emissions PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA Y

Page 299: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Total Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YDimethyl Ether PASS NA YFormaldehyde PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YMethanol PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) INVALID NA NHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) INVALID NA NTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YZinc PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YCopper Fume; Dusts and Mists, as Cu PASS Y YCadmium PASS Y YBarium & Compounds, as Ba PASS Y YArsenic PASS Y YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YZinc PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YCopper Fume; Dusts and Mists, as Cu PASS NA YCadmium PASS NA YBarium & Compounds, as Ba PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YArsenic PASS NA YNickel PASS Y YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YCadmium PASS Y YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS Y YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPhosphorus PASS Y YTotal HAP Pollutant INVALID NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds INVALID NA YFormaldehyde FAIL NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YMethanol PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound INVALID NA YMethanol INVALID NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA Y

Page 300: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Methanol PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YFormaldehyde PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA YFormaldehyde PASS NA YMethanol PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA YMethanol PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YFormaldehyde PASS NA YMethanol PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA YMethanol PASS NA YFormaldehyde PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA NTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide INVALID NA NNitrogen Dioxide INVALID NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INC NA NNitrogen Oxide INC NA NNitrogen Dioxide INC NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YNitrogen Dioxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Oxide FAIL NA Y

Page 301: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide FAIL NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms INVALID Y NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA NHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS Y YVisible Emissions PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA Y

Page 302: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Hydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons FAIL NA Y

Page 303: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Total Hydrocarbons FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA Y

Page 304: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Nitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA Y

Page 305: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Dioxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YChlorine PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YChlorine PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YChlorine PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA NVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA Y

Page 306: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Total Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds INVALID N YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS N YBeryllium PASS NA YCadmium PASS NA YChromium PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YArsenic PASS NA Ynickel Powder PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA Y

Page 307: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSulfuric Acid PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide INVALID NA NCO - Carbon Monoxide INVALID NA NPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound INVALID NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA Y

Page 308: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YAntimony PASS Y YArsenic PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSelenium PASS Y YNickel PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YBeryllium PASS Y YCadmium PASS Y YChromium PASS Y YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS Y YMN - Manganese PASS Y YCobalt PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YAntimony PASS Y YArsenic PASS Y YBeryllium PASS Y YCadmium PASS Y YChromium PASS Y YCobalt PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YMN - Manganese PASS Y YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS Y YNickel PASS Y YSelenium PASS Y YMN - Manganese INVALID Y YPb - Lead INVALID Y YCobalt INVALID Y YChromium INVALID Y YCadmium INVALID Y YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms INVALID Y YSelenium INVALID Y YAntimony INVALID Y YArsenic INVALID Y YBeryllium INVALID Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA Y

Page 309: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Nickel INVALID Y YZinc PASS NA YThallium PASS NA YSilver Metal and Soluble Compounds, as AG PASS NA YSelenium PASS NA YPhosphorus PASS NA YNickel PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YMN - Manganese PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YCopper Fume; Dusts and Mists, as Cu PASS NA YCobalt PASS NA YChromium PASS NA YCadmium PASS NA YBeryllium PASS NA YBarium & Compounds, as Ba PASS NA YArsenic PASS NA YAntimony PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YThallium PASS NA YSilver Metal and Soluble Compounds, as AG PASS NA YZinc PASS NA YAntimony PASS NA YArsenic PASS NA YBarium & Compounds, as Ba PASS NA YBeryllium PASS NA YCadmium PASS NA YChromium PASS NA YCobalt PASS NA YCopper Fume; Dusts and Mists, as Cu PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YMN - Manganese PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YNickel PASS NA YPhosphorus PASS NA YSelenium PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA Y

Page 310: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MINVALID NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MINVALID NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA Y

Page 311: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide INVALID N YNitrogen Dioxide PASS Y YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS Y YNitrogen Oxide PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons FAIL NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCadmium PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSulfuric Acid PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA Y

Page 312: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Hydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YCarbon Disulfide PASS NA YCarbon Disulfide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YFluorides PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFluorides PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y Y

Page 313: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS N YPb - Lead FAIL N YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS N YPb - Lead FAIL N YPb - Lead FAIL N YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS N YPb - Lead FAIL N YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS N YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS Y YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS Y YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide FAIL NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS Y YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS Y YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS Y YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YVisible Emissions PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA Y

Page 314: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Nitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA NTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA NTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA NTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA NTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA NTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA NHydrogen Sulfide(see Modification) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YHydrogen Sulfide(see Modification) PASS NA YHydrogen Sulfide(see Modification) PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA NFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA NNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA NNitrogen Oxide PASS NA NSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements FAIL NA Y

Page 315: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Nitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YMethanol PASS NA YMethanol PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YSulfuric Acid PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSulfuric Acid PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSulfuric Acid FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPb - Lead PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS Y YPb - Lead PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS Y Y

Page 316: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YFormaldehyde PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA Y

Page 317: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Total Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YHydrogen Fluoride (Hydrofluoric Acid) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA Y

Page 318: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Nitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons FAIL NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide FAIL NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide FAIL NA Y

Page 319: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSulfuric Acid PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YSulfuric Acid PASS NA Y

Page 320: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA NTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA Y

Page 321: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Visible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YMN - Manganese PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA Y

Page 322: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Nitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YDibenzo-P-Dioxin PASS Y YPolychlorinated Dibenzofurans (Furans) (Dibenzofurans) PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YDibenzo-P-Dioxin PASS Y YPolychlorinated Dibenzofurans (Furans) (Dibenzofurans) PASS Y YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPolychlorinated Dibenzofurans (Furans) (Dibenzofurans) PASS Y YDibenzo-P-Dioxin PASS Y YPolychlorinated Dibenzofurans (Furans) (Dibenzofurans) PASS Y YDibenzo-P-Dioxin PASS Y YNitrogen Oxide PASS Y YNitrogen Dioxide PASS Y YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YNitrogen Oxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Dioxide FAIL NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS Y YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA Y

Page 323: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CO - Carbon Monoxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Oxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Dioxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS Y YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA Y

Page 324: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YDibenzo-P-Dioxin PASS NA YPolychlorinated Dibenzofurans (Furans) (Dibenzofurans) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YTotal HAP Pollutant PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA Y

Page 325: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Nitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds FAIL NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide INVALID NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide INVALID NA YNitrogen Oxide INVALID NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide INVALID NA YTotal non-methane organic compound INVALID NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA NMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA NNitrogen Oxide PASS NA NNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA NVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA Y

Page 326: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA Y

Page 327: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds INVALID NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds INVALID NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds INVALID NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL Y YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) INVALID NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YBeryllium PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA Y

Page 328: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Facility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFugitive Emissions PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS Y YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds INVALID Y YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds INVALID Y YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds INVALID Y YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds INVALID Y YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YMethanol PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA Y

Page 329: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Nitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA NTotal Hydrocarbons PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YAntimony PASS NA YArsenic PASS NA YBeryllium PASS NA YCadmium PASS NA YChromium PASS NA YCobalt PASS NA YPb - Lead PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YNickel PASS NA YSelenium PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YMN - Manganese PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INVALID NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) FAIL NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YPM10 - Primary PM10 (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) (PM<10 MPASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YArsenic PASS NA YBeryllium PASS NA YCadmium PASS NA Y

Page 330: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Pb - Lead PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YMercury, as HG; Alkyl & Aryl CMPNDS; Elemental & Inorganic Forms PASS NA YNickel PASS NA YChromium PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Dioxide FAIL NA YNitrogen Oxide FAIL NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound FAIL NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YDibenzo-P-Dioxin PASS Y YPolychlorinated Dibenzofurans (Furans) (Dibenzofurans) PASS Y YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YFacility-Wide Permit Requirements PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YVisible Emissions PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YChlorine PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide PASS NA YCO - Carbon Monoxide PASS NA YNitrogen Oxide PASS NA YNitrogen Dioxide PASS NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) PASS NA YSulfuric Acid PASS NA YTotal Hydrocarbons PASS NA YSO2 - Sulfur Dioxide FAIL NA YPE - Primary PM (Includes Filterables + Condensibles) INC NA NChromium PASS NA YHydrochloric Acid (Hydrogen Chloride) PASS Y YChlorine PASS Y YVOC - Volatile Organic Compounds PASS NA YTotal non-methane organic compound PASS Y Y

Page 331: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

NOTES

Testing company failed to utilize proper Method 5 analysis procedures.Testing company failed to utilize proper Method 5 analysis procedures.Testing company failed to utilize proper Method 5 analysis procedures.

The PTE was demonstrated by continuous differential pressure readings recorded on a dataogger. At the end of the test the PTE was confirmed by observation of inward flow of smole at natural draft openings at the rear service door, a loading dock door and the entrance to the cafeteria. The digital readout of the differential pressure fluctuated from 0.002 to 0.02 during periodic observation while the test was in progress.The inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr wtih the maximum of 58.5 lbs OC/hr and a minimum of 32.8 lbs OC/hr. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate without supplemental solvent charge. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.

As many parts as possible, mixed large and small parts.As many parts as possible, mixed large and small parts.As many parts as possible, mixed large and small parts.

The production rate is listed variously in several permits/applications. This matter is being investigatedThe production rate is listed variously in several permits/applications. This matter is being investigated

Page 332: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Dimethyl ether triplicate analysis on inlet sample averaged 96% recovery. Stack gases averaged 71.7 lbs/hr at inlet and 0.4 lb/hr at outlet. CI inlet temperature averaged 311.3 C, outlet temp averaged 521.6 C with delta T equal to 210.3 dgrees CUSEPA approved the use Method 323 prior to the test. Duplicate analysis of 3rd run inlet sample was within 10%. Field blank sample reported as no detectable. Requested that laboratory report any analysis of spiked sample for accuracy and precision..Passed zero and span gas drift checks using 20.9 ppm gas strandard within 3% variation for instrument reponse.USEPA approved the use of Method 308 prior to test. Two methanol spiked samples at 1.98 mg in blank impinger water had 97% and 98% recovery. The sampling blank impinger solution was reported at no detectable and the laboratory blank was reported at the detection limit of 0.01 mg. The silica gel tube sampling blank was reported at no detectable, with no breakthrough reported in 2 of the outlet sampling tubes. Stack samples averaged 0.8 lb/hr at inlet and 0.002 lb/hr at outlet.Tester failed to prepare equipment that conformed to previously cited requirements of method 26A (no stainless steel allowed in the sample probe). This was after 5 months of preparation/negotiation leading up to test.Tester failed to prepare equipment that conformed to previously cited requirements of method 26A (did not use one piece sample probe on 800F Stack).

Method 320 with FTIR failed spike recovery with 63% reported below minimum of 70% required. Failure to achieve hourly allowable attributed to TO bed temperature of 618 C compare to 650 C normal operating remperature.

Method 320 with FTIR.Method 320 for combined VOC met 98% destuction. Reported 62% methanol recovery on inlet below required 70% revcovery.

Page 333: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Method 320 FTIR with 90% methanol recovery within range of 70 to 130%.Drift checks witnessedMethod 320 FTIR with 90% methanol recovery within range of 70 to 130%.Method 320 FTIR with 90% methanol recovery within range of 70 to 130%.

Method 320 FTIR with methanol spike recovery fallling within 70 and 130%.Method 320 FTIR with methanol spike recovery fallling within 70 and 130%.

Method 320 FTIR with methanol spike recovery fallling within 70 and 130%.Method 320 FTIR with methanol spike recovery fallling within 70 and 130%.Method 320 FTIR with 90% methanol recovery within range of 70 to 130%.Method 320 FTIR with 90% methanol recovery within range of 70 to 130%.

Method 320 FTIR with 90% methanol recovery within range of 70 to 130%.Method 320 FTIR with 90% methanol recovery within range of 70 to 130%.

Method 320 with FTIR. Methanol spike recovery 101%.Method 320 with FTIR spike recovery at 101% reported. Thermal oxidizer bed temperature reported to average 625 degrees celsius between 8:00 am and 11:30 pm.Method 320 for methanol, dimethyl ether, and formaldehyde. Reported 101% methanol spike recovery.These test results were entered during the TV renewal process in July 2013. The results were not comprehensively reviewed for compliance with the methods as 6 years had passed between receipt of the results and entering the data into Stars2 (the results were never entered into CETA). The report indicates an average combustion chamber temperature of 1516.0 deg F which would establish an operating threshold of greater than or equal to 1466.0 deg F (-50 deg F) within the combustion chamber in order to comply with the permit requirements. The report does not include information about audit samples and was not stamped with a received date (the received date indicated above is an estimate). Also, Natalie Jalil witnessed the tests but is not available in the picklist b/c she is not an active Stars2 user.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed through a Director''s exemption in order for Shelly to evaluate the feasibility of using ground rubber tire in a new asphalt binder.

This test (runs 5-7) was invalidated to improper Fo and incorrect collection of M3 samples. This indicates that heat input rate may be miscalculated.

According to the PTI application , the maximum amount of coating and lining applied per hour is 5.92 gallons. During the test, 5.5 gallons/hour of coating/lining was applied and 165.7 lids per hour were coated and lined. Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.According to the PTI application , the maximum amount of coating and lining applied per hour is 5.92 gallons. During the test, 5.5 gallons/hour of coating/lining was applied and 165.7 lids per hour were coated and lined. Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.

Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.

K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.

Page 334: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Testing to comply with Title V permit. There was some confusion as to what limit applied. There were two limits listed in the Title V permit, one that refers to 3745-75-02(K) found in the table of emissionslimits and another in the testing section that is a modificaiton of this rule to make it less stringent. Both of these emissions limitations differed from the federal rule limit, which is less stringent than both the state rule and the limitation found in the testing section. This confusion will be corrected during the next Title V renewal.Testing to comply with PE limit (PM+PM10)Testing to comply with PE limit (PM+PM10)Testing to comply with PE limit (PM+PM10)Testing to comply with PE limit (PM+PM10)CO failed but was re-tested on February 9, 2007 with a passing result. Fiberizer nat. gas feed too rich and facility emission estimates based on engineering calculations because there was no plant operational data or previous testing to base permit limits upon.

to comply with PE limitation (PM + PM10)Tester performed response factor analysis to convert ppm Propane to ppm Ethanol per EPA Method 25A. Response factor of 2.36 using an ethanol calibration gas. Emissions reported in terms of lb/hr Ethanol since it is the main OC of interest at this facility. Modified Method 308 performed concurrently, but errors in sample recovery/shipping (incorrect sample container) makes comparisons between M25A data and M308 data questionable

Tester did not complete the Section 8.3.2 procedures for EPA Method 29. Therefore, compliance with the Hg emission limitation could not be determined. Facility will retest emission unit for Hg.EPA Method 5, Section 11.2.1 procedures were not followed when the tester failed to utilize tarred weighing dishes when weighing the filters. Weighing filters directly on the balance potentially biased the reported particulate matter emissions low. Central District Office determined that the potential error introduced into the PM results would not be great enough to put the facility out of compliance.

Note that the EU ID of B001 was only used to save 3/30/06 RATA. The RATA is for the NOx CEM for the SCR. Facility wide emissions are controlled by one SCR. The emissions units venting to the SCR are B001, B002,B003,B004,B005,B006,B023,B024,B025,B026,B027,B028,B029,B030,B031,P010,P011,P012,P014,P015,P021,P032,P035, and P036.

PTI modification requested to alter permit limits now that actual operational emission data is available.

Page 335: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

T183 is listed as an insignificant emissions unit in the Title V permit. It is referred to in the emissions test report as F001.

The max that this plant can run is very close to 120 TPH due to an under sized drag slat. This test was not witnessedThe max that this plant can run is very close to 120 TPH due to an under sized drag slat. This test was not witnessed

The max that this plant can run is very close to 120 TPH due to an under sized drag slat. This test was not witnessedThe max that this plant can run is very close to 120 TPH due to an under sized drag slat. This test was not witnessed

Test method 323, formaldehyde

Testing was conducted from 12/11/07 to 12/13/07.

Page 336: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PWR - Production during the test was low. Facility orders are very low. Company attributes this to slow economy. During the test, this issue was discussed and facility understands when production picks back up toward normal levels, retest will likely be required. This issue is also addressed in the letter to the facility.PWR - Production during the test was low. Facility orders are very low. Company attributes this to slow economy. During the test, this issue was discussed and facility understands when production picks back up toward normal levels, retest will likely be required. This issue is also addressed in the letter to the facility.Allowable pressure drop across the baghouse in PTI 02-20473 is 1-5 inches water. Tested at 2.3 inches water.Allowable pressure drop across the baghouse in PTI 02-20473 is 1-5 inches water. Tested at 2.3 inches water.

PTI 02-20473 specified a pressure drop range across the baghouse of 1 - 5 inches water. Tested at 1.6 inches water.PTI 02-20473 specified a pressure drop range across the baghouse of 1 - 5 inches water. Tested at 1.6 inches water.

The catalyst inlet temperature during the test was 1100¿F.The catalyst inlet temperature during the test was 1100¿F.The catalyst inlet temperature during the test was 1087¿F.The catalyst inlet temperature during the test was 1070¿F.The catalyst inlet temperature during the test was 1080¿F.The catalyst inlet temperature during the test was 1085¿F.The catalyst inlet temperature during the test was 1037¿F.The catalyst inlet temperature during the test was 1092¿F.The catalyst inlet temperature during the test was 1096¿F.

This emissions unit was not required to test in any permit or by any rule.This emissions unit was not required to test in any permit or by any rule.

Page 337: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Also conducted Methods 1-4, 18Also conducted Methods 1-4, 18

Emission testing, per Civil Action No. 1:92 CV 1928Emission testing, per Civil Action No. 1:92 CV 1928NOTE: This testing for HCl and Cl2 was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDD. This rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. HCl emissions were determined to be 0.010 lb/MM Btu and Cl2 emissions were determined to be 0.004 lb/MM Btu.

NOTE: This testing for total mercury (ash, oxidized and elemental) was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDDD. ASTM D6784-02 was used. This MACT rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of mercury were: ash - 3.94E-07; oxidized - 2.63E-06; and elemental - 4.02E-07.NOTE: This testing for HCl and Cl2 was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDD. This rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of Hcl were determined to be 0.008 lb/MM Btu and emissions of Cl2 were determined to be 0.004 lb/MM Btu.

NOTE: This testing for total mercury (ash, oxidized and elemental) was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDDD. ASTM D6784-02 was used. The MACT rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of mercury were: ash - 3.54E-07; oxidized - 2.64E-06; and elemental - 3.82E-07.

Page 338: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

also verified PTE with method 204

marginally compliant requested retest within one yearFailed to meet required 90% DE. However, test team had problems withwith low fuel tank due to a leak in one of the FIDs. Fuel tank run out for the second day in a row. Though operation was identical for all 3 runs, inlet and outlet readings for run #3 were not consistant with first two, probably effected by low fuel in fuel tank. Wrote facility and told them we could not accept run 3.test run 2 hours per subpart UUUPermittee will be asked to test again next year since results were close to allowable.Test accepted after discussions with Central Office despite failing audit (biased high).

NOV will be sent for failure. During testing the stack test team was asked to use an inline thermocouple for filter temperature, to straighten the nozzle on 2 occasions prior to starting a run, to weigh H2O on site, to measure stack diameter as it was incorrect in the ITT. No other problems that could jeoprodize test results were observed.Following the completion of Run 3, the post test span calibration error check performed at B009 Oxidation Catalyst Inlet Duct resulted in a value outside the allowable +/-5% of the span gas value. Therefore, Run3 was voided and an additional run (Run4) was performed. The result from Run 3 did not included in the report.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. 60,000 cfm baghouse #1 controls only grinding operations (more than sufficient capacity) 2. test results were extremely lowAlthough actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Page 339: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although the 3rd run''s melt rate was low, addition of flux, removal of slag, and pouring continued. This did not appear to affect emissions significantly compared to the other 2 test runs.Although the 3rd run''s melt rate was low, addition of flux, removal of slag, and pouring continued. This did not appear to affect emissions significantly compared to the other 2 test runs.Although the 3rd run''s melt rate was low, addition of flux, removal of slag, and pouring continued. This did not appear to affect emissions significantly compared to the other 2 test runs.Concerns with test company conforming to Methods 1-4 and 26A. Runs 2&3 were acceptable; therefore, the test report was accepted.

Tested for sulfur dioxide using Method 8.

Test method was 6C.

Low PWR determination made by Jeff Skebba.

The heat input rate of 8.57 MMBtu/hr is representative of normal operations and is considered acceptable.Method 10 CO analyzer was inoperable on test day. New analyzer being brought in. Test rescheduled for 04/18/07.Method 10 CO analyzer inoperable. New analyzer being brought in. Test rescheduled for 04/18/07.

Purpose of testing was to determine PM emissions at an elevated SOGB operating temperature averaging 1580 F. Testing was performed with liquid burn.

The actual test date for this unit was 8/7/07. This unit vents to Baghouse #2 as well as the Wet Collector.

The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.

0.0 min of VEs were observed in 2 hrsCO was also tested at a low SOGB operating temperature of 1453. The CO emission rate was 204.4 lbs/hr at this temperature. Although this exceeded the allowable rate, ISP had been granted a Discretionary Exemption from the Ohio EPA Director allowing this.DRE of >99.9965% was determined using gas-only input to SOGB. DRE was also measured at >99.996692% when both gas and liquid residue were input to SOGB.DRE of >99.996% was determined using gas-only input to SOGB. DRE was also measured at >99.997% when both gas and liquid residue were input to SOGB.

Page 340: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

This test was a self-evaluation engineering study. The results of this test will be used to help establish a PM10 limit. The results of this test cannot be used to demonstrate compliance because only two test runs were performed.

Test method was 6C.

A seperate maximum source operating rate had to be calculated for each of the individual test runs, because different kinds of molds were processed and because these molds are processed at different rates. These (maximum) rates are 165 molds/hr for run 1, 229.7 molds/hr for run 2, and 262 molds/hr for run 3. The actual source operating rates were 161.5 molds/hr for run 1, 209.5 molds/hr for run 2, and 213 molds/hr for run 3.These numbers show the source was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum operating rate.

allowable emission rate: 0.010 gr/dscf

NOTE: Ohio EPA is not accepting these test results, because of a failed pitot tube leak check; also, the test was performed at only 87% of the maximum operating rate.

Page 341: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.

Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.

Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.

Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.

Allowable emissions were: 0.010 gr/dscf (stack 116003), 0.010 gr/dscf (stack 116006)

Average tested emission rate was 0.65 lbs/hr as VOC, assuming VOC is all phenol.

Average tested emission rate was 0.65 lbs/hr as VOC, assuming VOC is all phenol.

Page 342: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Test method was 5E.Test method was 5E.Test method was 5E.Test method was 5E.Test method was 5E.Method 5 was used in conjunction with Method 202.Method 5 was used in conjunction with Method 202.Method 5 was used in conjunction with Method 202.Method 5 was used in conjunction with Method 202.Method 5 was used in conjunction with Method 202.

Purpose of test was to evaluate DRE at "medium load".Sauder supplied production information with the test report, which demonstrated they were operating at an acceptable fraction of their maximum process weight rate.

Sauder supplied production information with the test report, which demonstrated they were operating at an acceptable fraction of their maximum process weight rate.

Sauder has provided production information in the test report, which demonstrates this emission unit was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum process weight rate.Sauder has provided production information in the test report, which demonstrates this emission unit was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum process weight rate.

The permitted allowable emission rate was below the method detection limit; therefore this test could not be used to show the PM10 was in compliance.

The permitted allowable emission rate was below the method detection limit; therefore this test could not be used to show the PM10 was in compliance.

Operated at 88.3% of maximum PWR; however test is considered acceptable.Average thermal oxidizer temperature during the test was 1325 F.Operated at 88.3% of maximum PWR; however test is considered acceptable.Average thermal oxidizer temperature during the test was 1325 F.

Page 343: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Average tested emission rate is a joint rate, for B001 and B002

Average tested emission rate is a joint rate, for B001 and B002

Emission rates and operating rates above are for K004 and K005 combined.

Facility was asked to furnish an explanation for the high heat input.Facility was asked to furnish an explanation for the high heat input.

Sawdust was used as a fuel source. Received Director''s Exemption.Sawdust was used as a fuel source.

Sawdust was used as a fuel source.Sawdust was used as a fuel source.Sawdust was used as a fuel source.

Emission rate and operating rate are average of test runs 1 and 2.Emission rate and operating rate are average of test runs 1 and 2.

Allowable emission rate is from 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD

Also tested for Total Selected Metals. Average tested emission rate was 0.000567 lbs/MMBtu, vs. an allowable of 0.001 lbs/MMBtu (MACT Subpart DDDDD).

Also tested for Total Selected Metals. Average tested emission rate was 0.000567 lbs/MMBtu, vs. an allowable of 0.001 lbs/MMBtu (MACT Subpart DDDDD).Tenneco also performed a low load test, with only K004 operating. The actual VOC emission rate for the low load test was 1.65 lbs/hr, and the DRE was 92.3%. The source operating rate was 24.5 lbs VOC/hr.

A fourth test run was performed on each oxidizer, with the capture tank disabled, to verify compliance under this operating scenario. The results were 97.6% DRE (RTO 1), and 98.95% DRE (RTO 2). The average oxidizer temperatures were 1404 F (RTO 1), and 1455 F (RTO 2).

The average tested emission rate of 0.0033 gr/dscf, and the permitted allowable emission rate of 0.015 gr/dscf, are corrected to 7% oxygen, dry basis, standard conditions.

Test method was ASTM D6784-02, for mercury.

Test method was 26A. Pollutant was nitric acid.Test method was 26A.

Page 344: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Allowable emission rate is from 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart DDDDD.

Low PWR.Low PWR.

Purpose of testing was to evaluate a different pellet size.

Purpose of testing was to evaluate a different pellet size.

Purpose of testing was to evaluate a different pellet size.All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.

All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.

All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.Average tested emission rate of 1.36 lbs/hr assumes VOC is methyl ethyl ketone.

Average tested emission rate of 2.5 lbs/hr assumes VOC is methyl ethyl ketone.Average tested emission rate of 2.5 lbs/hr assumes VOC is methyl ethyl ketone.Average tested emission rate of 2.5 lbs/hr assumes VOC is methyl ethyl ketone.Average tested emission rate of 2.5 lbs/hr assumes VOC is methyl ethyl ketone.Average tested emission rate of 2.5 lbs/hr assumes VOC is methyl ethyl ketone.

No third run -- ran out of lead oxide to transfer. Todd Brown accepted two runs.also did method 17.No third run -- ran out of lead oxide to transfer. Todd Brown accepted two runs.

Test method was 26A.

Zero Visible Emissions (vs. allowable of 5.0 min VE/2 hrs)

Actual Emission Rates: from autoclave: 0.278 lbs/hr, 0.00058 lbs/lb rubber. from muffler (stack): 0.315 lbs/hr; 0.000655 lbs/lb rubber Test used a modified Method 15.Actual Emission Rates: from autoclave: 0.125 lbs/hr, 0.001261 lbs/lb rubber from muffler (stack): 0.038 lbs/hr; 0.000381 lbs/lb rubber Test used a modified Method 15.A control efficiency of 98.67% was measured using Method 25A at both the RTO inlet and outlet.

Average tested emission rate, and DRE, are combined results for K004-K008.Average tested emission rate, and DRE, are combined results for K004-K008.Average tested emission rate, and DRE, are combined results for K004-K008.Average tested emission rate, and DRE, are combined results for K004-K008.

9.97 lb PM/hr / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 0.79 lb/ton0.6 lb PM/hr / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 0.047 lb/ton

0.04 lbs/hr CO / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = .003 lb/ton.22.34 lbs/hr SO2 / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 2.02 lb/ton. Results drift corrected per method0.30 lb PM/hr / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 0.02 lb/ton

0.92 lb FL/hr/ 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 0.0726 lb/ton

0.6 lb PM/hr / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 0.047 lb/ton0.92 lb FL/hr/ 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 0.0726 lb/ton9.97 lb PM/hr / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 0.79 lb/ton0.30 lb PM/hr / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 0.02 lb/ton15.45 lbs/hr CO / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 1.22 lb/ton.22.34 lbs/hr SO2 / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = 2.02 lb/ton. Results drift corrected per method0.04 lbs/hr CO / 12.67 ton glass pulled/hr = .003 lb/ton.

Page 345: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

also did method 17 along with this test.also did method 17 along with this test.low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..failed lead. PM OK.failed lead. first run high. re-test Jan 08.failed lead. PM OK. also did Method 17failed lead. first run high. re-test Jan 08.failed lead. first run high. re-test Jan 08.failed lead. PM OK. also did Method 17failed lead. first run high. re-test Jan 08.failed lead. PM OK. also did Method 17

this RTO was just installed on July 31, 2007this RTO was just installed on July 31, 2007this RTO was just installed on July 31, 2007lab technician did not hold samples in dark for 30 minutes. TES requested a re-test. This occurred on 6/28/07. Results were similar.lab technician did not hold samples in dark for 30 minutes. TES requested a re-test. This occurred on 6/28/07. Results were similar.lab technician did not hold samples in dark for 30 minutes. TES requested a re-test. This occurred on 6/28/07. Results were similar.

MACT subpart DDDDD, vacated on July 30, 2007. at this time, TDES will not require Sun to retest the heaters. However, when the Boiler MACT is re-instated or a determination is required a re-test will be requested of the three heaters.The Boiler MACT Subpart DDDDD was vacated on July 30, 2007, so a t this time, TDES will not require Sun to re-test. however, when the Boiler Mact is reinstated or a determination is required, we will require a retest of the three heaters.this was the coke burn condition. average oxygen % volume was 0.5 tests performed for MACT II performance requirements pertining to CRU''s.this was the oxidation condition. average oxygen % volume was 2.2 % vol. tests performed for MACT II performance requirements pertaining to CRU''s.ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference. slipstream open.. NOV sent our to re do stack test on this date.ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference.ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference. Method 18 for methane. also did a formaldehyde NCASI Method 98.01 with results of 0.014 lb/hr.re test per Todd Brown. slipstream closed..re test per Todd Brown. slipstream closed.. Method 98 formaldehydere test per Todd Brown. slipstream closed..re test per Todd Brown. slipstream closed..re test per Todd Brown. slipstream closed.. Method 98 formaldehydere test per Todd Brown. slipstream closed..re test per Todd Brown. slipstream closed.. Method 98 formaldehyderetest passed. slipstream open

O2 was -0.37% O2 difference where +- 1% allowable )2 by difference

Page 346: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

coke burn cycle was 1.50 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.14 with a L/G ratio of 0.53coke burn cycle was 1.61 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.11 with a L/G ratio of 0.50coke burn cycle was 1.51 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.62 with a L/G ratio of 0.49coke burn cycle was 2.32 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.26 with a L/G ratio of 0.48coke burn cycle was 1.00 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.35 with a L/G ratio of 0.48

O2 concentration was 0.19% O2 difference5.44% based on Mean Reference Method Values. O2 difference is 0.94% rel accuracacy

SO2 data was recorded in field notes and by data logger methods.,

Page 347: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

NH3 testedfound them to be in compliance. crusher had the highest avg at 13.75% with a limit of 15%.

cullet ratio of 37.0 % with low-decrepitating dolomitecullet ratio of 37.0 % with low-decrepitating dolomite

ezcool with a cullet ratio of 29.6% and high-decrepitating dolomite used

Pam will issue an NOVcullet ratio of 37.0 % with low-decrepitating dolomite32.5% cullet

Page 348: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Destruction efficiency was 98.93%, permit minimum is 98.0%Destruction efficiency was 98.93%, permit minimum is 98.0%

Page 349: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Tested while burning used oil.Tested while burning used oil.Tested while burning used oil.

Method 201a

Method 201aMethod 201a

Page 350: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Method 13B.Method 13B.Method 13B.Method 13B.

Page 351: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

The tested emission rate is the highest 6-minute average, not the average of the test period.

The tested emission rate is the highest 6-minute average, not the average of the test period.

Page 352: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

SA

Page 353: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

The unit is oversized for this process which resulted in the much lower than maximum operating rate. This unit was operated at the normal maximum rate during the test.

C3 was the only ESP cabinet out of service during test. All other cabinets were in service.

This report presents the results of a compliance demonstration test conducted on March 15,2007 under typical operating load conditions while firing both Heavy and Light Hydrocarbon residue (HHC&LLC).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).

The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

LOW CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

LOW/MID CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

EFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscf

Tested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscf

Page 354: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MID/HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy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

INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. PROCESS HAS POTENTIAL TO FEED 300 TPH BUT ENCOUNTERS BOTTLENECKS WHICH DO NOT ALLOW CONSISTENT HIGH TANK FILL RATES. OPERATING RATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN AT MAXIMUM BASED ON FILL RATES OF TANKS DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THERE WERE PAUSES BETWEEN TANKS TO ALLOW FOR TANK SWITCHING.INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. OPERATING RATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN AT MAXIMUM BASED ON HISTORICAL AVERAGE PACKING RATE OF 32 TONS PER HOUR.INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. FIRST TWO TEST RUNS AVERAGED GREATER THAN 62 TONS PACKED. THIRD RUN WAS MUCH LESS AT 40 TONS PACKED. THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARS TO HAVE RUN AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY GIVEN BOTTLENECK CONDITIONS AND COMPARISON TO HISTORICAL AVERAGE PACKING RATE OF 68 TONS PER HOUR.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 55.5 LB SO2/HR; 0.66 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 157.6 SO2/ HR; 0.1.89 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 3.15 LB PE/HR; 0.02 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.31 LB PE/ HR; 0.002PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 18.9 LB SO2/HR; 0.21 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 146 LB SO2/ HR; 1.67 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 2.12LB PE/HR; 0.014 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.35 LB PE/ HR; 0.002 PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS LIMIT THIS BOILER TO 169 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. OPERATED AT 100% PERMITTED CAPACITY. OPERATED AT 90% OF MAXIMUM STEAM LOAD.

OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS LIMIT THIS BOILER TO 169 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. OPERATED AT 100% PERMITTED CAPACITY. OPERATED AT 90% OF MAXIMUM STEAM LOAD. PARTICULATE RESULTS ACTUALLY 0.006 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT.

FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS.FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS.FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS. THE 7.3 LB/HR AS PROPANE CALCULATED FROM METHOD 25 RESULTS OF 6.0 LB/HR AS CARBON.

FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.THROUGHPUT CALCULATION BASED ON 3827 BUSHELS OF CORN PER HOUR AVERAGE DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. P002 IS LIMITED IN ITS CAPACITY DUE TO THE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF EMISSION UNIT P003. BASED ON THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT OF P003, P002 WAS NEAR ITS MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THIS WAS A RETEST OF P002 AFTER SCRUBBER REPAIR AND MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE AND REDUCE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. AS THE 2006 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION OF P002 SHOWED SO2 EMISSIONS TO BE WELL BELOW THE PERMIT ALLOWABLE, RAPCA DETERMINED THAT ANOTHER DEMONSTRATION OF SO2 FOR THIS EMISSION UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTED.

Method 18 and Method 25A used to determine VOC compliance. Method 25 was used at the inlet due to a low response factor for phenol. Method 204 was used to verify permanent total enclosure.

Page 355: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THIS IS A TEMPORARY/RENTAL BOILER USED IN TIMES WHEN BACKUP IS NECESSARY OR PRIMARY BOILERS ARE INOPERABLE DUE TO MAINTENANCE OUTAGE. THIS BOILER REQUIRED MAINTENANCE AND RETESTED IN MAY 2007.

THIS IS A TEMPORARY/RENTAL BOILER USED IN TIMES WHEN BACKUP IS NECESSARY OR PRIMARY BOILERS ARE INOPERABLE DUE TO MAINTENANCE OUTAGE. THIS BOILER WAS RETUNED AND FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION AMONG OTHER CHANGES IMPROVED ITS PERFORMANCE WHILE LIMITING THE MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.FIRED ON 100% COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. BASED ON CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, RAPCA CALCULATED HEAT INPUT TO BE 597 MMBTU/HR.FIRED ON 100% COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. BASED ON CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, RAPCA CALCULATED HEAT INPUT TO BE 597 MMBTU/HR.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.RAPCA CALCULATION OF HEAT INPUT 594 MMBTU/HR.RAPCA CALCULATION OF HEAT INPUT 594 MMBTU/HR. 100% COAL FIRED DURING COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION.

100% COAL FIRED FOR COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION.FIRED ON 100% COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION.FIRED ON 100% COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engeneering testins and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS..PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.

Page 356: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

200,000 lbs/silo is processed over an 8 hour shift.

Test was conducted per Permit-to-Install 13-04335.P001 and P002 are vented to the same control device and have the same exhaust stack, both EUs were tested simultaneously. The tested emission rate passed both P001 and P002 individual emission limitations, thus, the tested rate also passed when the emission limits were combined.Audit samples were not available for this test.P001 and P002 are vented to the same control device and have the same exhaust stack, both EUs were tested simultaneously. The tested emission rate passed both P001 and P002 individual emission limitations, thus, the tested rate also passed when the emission limits were combined.

The permit states that the max PWR is 3.6 dry sludge tons/hour. However, that is for "polymer conditioned, centrifuge dewatered" sludge. On the day of the test run, Southerly only burned "thermally conditioned" dry sludge. The max PWR for thermally conditioned dry sludge is 2.7 dry sludge tons/hour. Therefore Southerly did operate near max capacity for the type of sludge they were burning on the day of the test.

The test had one run that resulted in the inlets emissions being less than the outlet emissions. Based on a previous similiar testing situation at another facility, CDAQ decided that this would not invalidate this test, and that compliance was demonstrated with the appropriate emissions limitation.

" From 2003 to 2007 different products such as 2.0L block, 3.0L/3.8L bearing cap and the 3.0L flywheel were produced not currently used to make engine blocks the above MACT test was conducted at the maximum production rate for producing bearing caps (maximum 17 tons iron/hour) which has been the sustained cycle rate since Feb., 2007." 15.5/17(100) = 91.2% meets the above 90% criteria

* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/18/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/19/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/20/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/21/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.

Page 357: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Opacity limits for crusher are as above. Opacity limits for transfer points is 10% opacity as a six-minute average.

In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for SO2 was conducted to determine an emission rate.

In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance.In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for CO was conducted to determine an emission rate.In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for VOC was conducted to determine an emission rate.

HCl testing was completed as a pre-MACT test and was not conducted for compliance. Emission rates in permit limit HCl to 21.4 lbs/hr. Since this was not a compliance test, Miller Brewery opted not to test iokinetically.

Mercury testing was conducted as pre-MACT testing and was not conducted for compliance. No Hg limitations in permit.The test was invalidated due to isokinetics ranging from 82.4-84.2. Particulate analytical data did not match the data used to calculate the reported emission rate. Reported emission rate was .0065 lb/mmbtu. The emission rate based on the analytical data was 0.19 lb/mmbtu.Mercury testing was conducted as pre-MACT testing and was not conducted for compliance. No Hg limitations in permit.HCl testing was completed as a pre-MACT test and was not conducted for compliance. Emission rates in permit limit HCl to 21.4 lbs/hr. Since this was not a compliance test, Miller Brewery opted not to test iokinetically.

CONDITION 1 - 2 FANS, OVERLAPPING VESSELSCONDITION 1 - 2 FANS, OVERLAPPING VESSELSCONDITION 2 - 2 FANS, SINGLE VESSEL OPERATIONCONDITION 2 - 2 FANS, SINGLE VESSEL OPERATION

Allowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sent

PART 60 CO LB/HR 2.40% 10% PART 60 CO LB/HR 3.13% 10% PART 60 CO LB/HR 5.51% 10% PART 60 CO LB/HR 6.80% 10% PART 60 CO LB/HR 1.27% 10% PART 60 CO LB/HR 2.83% 10% PART 60 CO LB/HR 4.12% 10% PART 60 CO LB/HR 1.33% 10%

BOTH CONDITIONS FAILED TO MEET THE MACT LIMIT OF 0.03 GR/DSCFRS SCRUBBER FLOW = 700 GPMFAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE MACT LIMIT OF 0.03 GR/DSCFRS SCRUBBER FLOW = 500 GPMPRESSURE DROP IS IN DIRECT VIOLATION WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTSTEST CONDITIONS: DP = 72" H2O & Q=1150 GPM

Page 358: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Absolute Value of the average difference between reference method for O2 and Facility CEM data was 0.05%

THE TEMPERATURE OF THE GAS AT THE CATALYST INLET WAS 675 DEGREES F AND THE PRESSURE DROP WAS 7.5".THE TEMPERATURE OF THE GAS AT THE CATALYST INLET WAS 678 DEGREES F AND THE PRESSURE DROP WAS 7.4".

METHOD 5B WAS USED TO DETERMINE NON-SULFURIC ACID PARTICULATE EMISSIONS.

THE PEN FOR THE OPACITY CHART RECORDER WAS BROKEN DURING THIS TEST. THE PEN HAD CLEARLY BEEN STUCK ON 2.9% OPACITY FOR DAYS. THE OPACITY MONITOR AND DAS WERE STILL READING AND OPERATING PROPERLY, AND WERE WITHIN OPERATING LIMITS. THE CHART READOUT WILL NOT SERVE AS A BACKUP TO THE DAS HOWEVER UNTIL THE PEN IS FIXED. THE OBSERVER TOLD THE FACILITY TO FIX THE PEN. THE NEXT OBSERVER THAT GOES TO THE ANNUAL TEST FOR THIS UNIT SHOULD CHECK TO MAKE SURE THIS HAS BEEN FIXED.

HIGH LOAD FLOW (SCFM) 7.5% RA 2.2% RA 1.018

FLOW (NORMAL) KSCFH 5.56% 10% 36AVERAGE EMISSION RATE FROM SINGLE BOTHS APPLIED TO THIRD DUPLEX BOOTH - ACID WASHAVERAGE EMISSION RATE FROM SINGLE BOTHS APPLIED TO THIRD DUPLEX BOOTH - ACID WASH

FLOW (H) SCFH 1.74% 10%

LOW LOAD 136 1.58 1.0125LOW LOAD 249 3.09% 1.0289CO2 PERCENT 2.99% NOLOW LOAD 136 1.58% 1.0125CO2 PERCENT 2.99% NOCO2 PERCENT 1.13% NOCO2 PERCENT 1.48% NOCO2 (%) - 0.93 %RATHIS WAS THE ANNUAL FLOW RATA FOR THIS UNITTHIS WAS THE ANNUAL FLOW RATA FOR THIS UNITCO2 (%) - 2.17 % RACO2 (%) - 1.10 %RA

LOW 49 2.54% YES - 1.0252LOW 80 5.02% NOTESTING TOOK PLACE ON 06/05 AND 06/21

ACTUAL EMISSION RATE FROM DUST COLLECTOR 1 = 0.13LB/HRACTUAL EMISSION RATE FROM DUST COLLECTOR 1 = 0.13LB/HRACTUAL EMISSION RATE FROM DUST COLLECTOR 1 = 0.13LB/HRACTUAL EMISSION RATE FROM DUST COLLECTOR 1 = 0.012LB/HR

Page 359: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

TESTING AND LAB ANALYSIS DID NOT MEET METHOD 18 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIATESTING AND LAB ANALYSIS DID NOT MEET METHOD 18 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIATESTING AND LAB ANALYSIS DID NOT MEET METHOD 18 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIATHE CATALYST ON THIS OXIDIZER WAS REPLACED IN JANUARY 2007 FOLLOWING A FAILED TEST.

Operated at 65% max capacity

Operated at 65% max capacity

CO CATALYST TEMPERATURE DURING TESTING WAS 490 DEG F.THIS TEST WAS ACTUALLY PERFORMED ON 8/23/07. CO CATALYST TEMPERATURE DURING TESTING WAS 497 DEG F.CO CATALYST TEMPERATURE DURING TESTING WAS 560 DEG F.CO CATALYST TEMPERATURE DURING TESTING WAS 553 DEG F.

ACTUAL EMISSION RATE FROM DUST COLLECTOR 1 = 0.012LB/HRACTUAL EMISSION RATE FROM DUST COLLECTOR 1 = 0.012LB/HRACTUAL EMISSION RATE FROM COLOR WEIGH DUST COLLECTOR = 0.00LB/HRACTUAL EMISSION RATE FROM COLOR WEIGH DUST COLLECTOR = 0.00LB/HRACTUAL EMISSION RATE FROM COLOR WEIGH DUST COLLECTOR = 0.00LB/HRTHE FACILITY HAS ALSO ADDED A CARBON MONOXIDE CONTINUOUS MONITOR TO THIS SOURCE FOR THEIR OWN USE, NOT FOR COMPLIANCE PURPOSES.THE FACILITY HAS ALSO ADDED A CARBON MONOXIDE CONTINUOUS MONITOR TO THIS SOURCE FOR THEIR OWN USE, NOT FOR COMPLIANCE PURPOSES.MAXIMUM EMISSIONS FROM 26 SILOS = 2.95 LB/HRHOLD TANKS - NAHOLD TANKS - 18 PPM

SO2 LB/MMBTU 5.86% 20%

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE LOW LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 6/26/07.

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE HIGH & MID LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 5/29/07.

HCDOES that the best way to determine compliance is to monitor coal usage and chlorine content of the coal.

OXYGEN % 0.37 < 1.0OXYGEN % 0.48 < 1.0

Page 360: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THIS TEST WAS CONDUCTED PER 40 CFR 60.18(f). THE APPLICABLE RULE REQUIRES A MINIMUM NET HEATING VALUE OF THE WASTE GAS AND LIMITS THE EXIT VELOCITY (DEPENDANT ON THE BTU VALUE OF THE WASTE GAS). METHOD 3C WAS EMPLOYED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS TEST.THIS TEST WAS CONDUCTED PER 40 CFR 60.18(f).THIS RETEST PERFORMED DUE TO A FAILED COMPLAINCE TEST IN AUGUST 2005 (CO AND SO2 RETEST)THIS RETEST PERFORMED DUE TO A FAILED COMPLAINCE TEST IN AUGUST 2005 (CO AND SO2 RETEST)A TEMPORARY TOTAL ENCLOSURE WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF K006 (PRESS #5). THE TTE MET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF METHOD 204. SEE OBSERVER''S REPORT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.METHOD 25A WAS APPROVED FOR DE TESTING ON THIS SOURCE BECAUSE ONLY A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENT IS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT. IF A LB/HR REQUIREMENT IS EVER IMPLEMENTED, THE SOURCE MAY BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM M25.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRESS COATER 1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 98.8% FOR C-5 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.

METHOD 19 USED TO DETERMINE STACK GAS FLOW-RATE; IN FUTURE METHOD 1-4 SHOULD BE USEDMETHOD 19 USED TO DETERMINE STACK GAS FLOW-RATE; IN FUTURE METHOD 1-4 SHOULD BE USED

METHOD 19 USED TO DETERMINE STACK GAS FLOW-RATE; IN FUTURE METHOD 1-4 SHOULD BE USEDMETHOD 19 USED TO DETERMINE STACK GAS FLOW-RATE; IN FUTURE METHOD 1-4 SHOULD BE USED

SUBJECT TO 40 CFR 60 SUBPART UUTesting for total organics was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with Method 25A and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions. Total Organic concentration determined by method 25A was 6.55 lb/hr.Testing was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with this test and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions.

LOW LOAD - 105 MW (2.63% RA WITH 1.0218 BIAS)CO2 PERCENT 0.90% NOMID LOAD 1.81 399 MW NOLOW 300 2.13 (BIAS: 1.0112)CO2 (%) - 1.61 %RA

O2 % 2.37 10O2 % 3.17 20O2 % 0.74 20

ACTUAL METHOD USED: 5A

Page 361: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.

THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.

THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.

Discovered during 04/15/10 FCE that the most recent emissions test results had not been entered into CETA. CEMS exhaust gas VOC equivalency concentration for 10 mg OC per liter of gasoline loaded was determined to be 0.68%.

Full production effort produced additional 2,000 LBS/HR, however, did not exceed emission rate permitted.

Failed PM10 and efficiency at 97.6 % instead of 99.9 %; test was invalid due to incorrect PTI calling for test of 6 EU P040 -P046 instead of 4 EUs P040 -P044. Retest for PM10 using RM201.

Amine based VOC compound, N, N-Dimethylisopropylamine (DMIPA). Pressure drop to be revised to 3.0 - 4.0 in. H2O in next application.D021 BH replaced the permitted D015 scrubber shutdown on P005 (with PWR of 50,000 lbs/hr sand), and now connected to three (3) additional EU''s P009, P010 & P012 (from D010 BH shutdown) to the new D021 BH using the same P005 emissions limit of 2.67 lbs/hr PE, but with increased operating rate.

BH DP range was slightly lower due to clean new bags at 3.66 - 5.54 in. H2O. Broken bag detector tested satisfactory. Achieved > 60 dscf for all 3 runs. Fugitive emissions passed and acceptable to MACT EEEEE total metal HAP - - see ID # 6887.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This test was for PM10. The compliance method in the permit stated to conduct Method 5 test and then conduct a particle size distribution on the material collected on the Method 5 filter to determine the portion that was PM10. That PM10 portion was to be added to this method 202 result. The Particle Size distribution was not able to be conducted because the sample size on the method 5 filter was too small. Therefore, this PM10 test is invalid. If assume all the Method 5 result is equal to PM10 size, then the Method 5 plus the Method 202 average becomes 5.47 lbs/hr which exceeds the PM10 allowable rate. A re-test is scheduled for 12/12/2007 to utilize Methods 201A & 202 for PM10 analysis.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. The permit also has a PM concentration limit of 0.005grains /dscf leaving the baghouse. Test results were 0.0094 grains/dscf. This was calculated from the PM mass measurement using Method 5. No separate testing was done.This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This emission unit is controlled by a baghouse, which was where the SO2 was measured, even though no control of the pollutant is expected. The compliance method for this permit is to control the amount of sulfur additions per a 3 hour period. 3 test runs were conducted at 1 hour each, so the combined total was used to provide the lbs SO2 per 3 hour period as stated in the permit.PM10 is the sum of the filterable PM10 and condensable PM10. Method 201A was used to determine filterable PM10, and Method 202 used for condensible PM10. All condensible PM caught in the impinger wash is assumed to be PM10 and smaller.The permit also has a PM concentration limit of 0.005grains /dscf leaving the baghouse. Test results were 0.00131 grains/dscf. This was calculated from the PM mass measurement using Method 5. No separate testing was done.

The report was dated 8/20/07 to the customer. The testing company said in its letter that Longaberger should send the report to us along with any other test data in their possession on their company letterhead. I believe this was the reason that we didn''t receive the report until 9/4/07 (little late).

Fugitive VEs were taken as well. For P128 & P129 Building: average = 9.15 % as a 3 min average of the 3 test runs. For P128 & P129 operations: Average = 0%.

Page 362: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Todd Scarborough was on site for about an hour in order to show the AGO how an asphalt plant operates.

Todd Scarborough was on site for about an hour in order to show the AGO how an asphalt plant operates.Todd Scarborough was on site for about an hour in order to show the AGO how an asphalt plant operates.Todd Scarborough was on site for about an hour in order to show the AGO how an asphalt plant operates.

Primary CEM had a Relative Accuracy (RA) of 0.069 for the lbs/hr, secondary CEM had a RA of 0.0226% for lbs/hr, the RA of the flow was 1.613%, the primary CEM had a RA of 0.036% for the ppmvw, and the secondary CEM had a RA of 0.140% for the ppmvw. The emissions unit operated at 50% of the maximum operating rate during the RATA.

Failed based on limitations at the time of test, permit allowables have since been increasedboiler not properly combusting, test not performed

1 pump leaked and was repaired

Page 363: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

The PTE was demonstrated by continuous differential pressure readings recorded on a dataogger. At the end of the test the PTE was confirmed by observation of inward flow of smole at natural draft openings at the rear service door, a loading dock door and the entrance to the cafeteria. The digital readout of the differential pressure fluctuated from 0.002 to 0.02 during periodic observation while the test was in progress.The inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr wtih the maximum of 58.5 lbs OC/hr and a minimum of 32.8 lbs OC/hr. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate without supplemental solvent charge. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.

The production rate is listed variously in several permits/applications. This matter is being investigatedThe production rate is listed variously in several permits/applications. This matter is being investigated

Page 364: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Dimethyl ether triplicate analysis on inlet sample averaged 96% recovery. Stack gases averaged 71.7 lbs/hr at inlet and 0.4 lb/hr at outlet. CI inlet temperature averaged 311.3 C, outlet temp averaged 521.6 C with delta T equal to 210.3 dgrees CUSEPA approved the use Method 323 prior to the test. Duplicate analysis of 3rd run inlet sample was within 10%. Field blank sample reported as no detectable. Requested that laboratory report any analysis of spiked sample for accuracy and precision..Passed zero and span gas drift checks using 20.9 ppm gas strandard within 3% variation for instrument reponse.USEPA approved the use of Method 308 prior to test. Two methanol spiked samples at 1.98 mg in blank impinger water had 97% and 98% recovery. The sampling blank impinger solution was reported at no detectable and the laboratory blank was reported at the detection limit of 0.01 mg. The silica gel tube sampling blank was reported at no detectable, with no breakthrough reported in 2 of the outlet sampling tubes. Stack samples averaged 0.8 lb/hr at inlet and 0.002 lb/hr at outlet.Tester failed to prepare equipment that conformed to previously cited requirements of method 26A (no stainless steel allowed in the sample probe). This was after 5 months of preparation/negotiation leading up to test.Tester failed to prepare equipment that conformed to previously cited requirements of method 26A (did not use one piece sample probe on 800F Stack).

Method 320 with FTIR failed spike recovery with 63% reported below minimum of 70% required. Failure to achieve hourly allowable attributed to TO bed temperature of 618 C compare to 650 C normal operating remperature.

Method 320 for combined VOC met 98% destuction. Reported 62% methanol recovery on inlet below required 70% revcovery.

Page 365: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Method 320 with FTIR spike recovery at 101% reported. Thermal oxidizer bed temperature reported to average 625 degrees celsius between 8:00 am and 11:30 pm.Method 320 for methanol, dimethyl ether, and formaldehyde. Reported 101% methanol spike recovery.These test results were entered during the TV renewal process in July 2013. The results were not comprehensively reviewed for compliance with the methods as 6 years had passed between receipt of the results and entering the data into Stars2 (the results were never entered into CETA). The report indicates an average combustion chamber temperature of 1516.0 deg F which would establish an operating threshold of greater than or equal to 1466.0 deg F (-50 deg F) within the combustion chamber in order to comply with the permit requirements. The report does not include information about audit samples and was not stamped with a received date (the received date indicated above is an estimate). Also, Natalie Jalil witnessed the tests but is not available in the picklist b/c she is not an active Stars2 user.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed through a Director''s exemption in order for Shelly to evaluate the feasibility of using ground rubber tire in a new asphalt binder.

This test (runs 5-7) was invalidated to improper Fo and incorrect collection of M3 samples. This indicates that heat input rate may be miscalculated.

According to the PTI application , the maximum amount of coating and lining applied per hour is 5.92 gallons. During the test, 5.5 gallons/hour of coating/lining was applied and 165.7 lids per hour were coated and lined. Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.According to the PTI application , the maximum amount of coating and lining applied per hour is 5.92 gallons. During the test, 5.5 gallons/hour of coating/lining was applied and 165.7 lids per hour were coated and lined. Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.K001-K003 averaged 138.45 pounds of VOC per hour captured by the PTE/sent to the RTO.

Page 366: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Testing to comply with Title V permit. There was some confusion as to what limit applied. There were two limits listed in the Title V permit, one that refers to 3745-75-02(K) found in the table of emissionslimits and another in the testing section that is a modificaiton of this rule to make it less stringent. Both of these emissions limitations differed from the federal rule limit, which is less stringent than both the state rule and the limitation found in the testing section. This confusion will be corrected during the next Title V renewal.

CO failed but was re-tested on February 9, 2007 with a passing result. Fiberizer nat. gas feed too rich and facility emission estimates based on engineering calculations because there was no plant operational data or previous testing to base permit limits upon.

Tester performed response factor analysis to convert ppm Propane to ppm Ethanol per EPA Method 25A. Response factor of 2.36 using an ethanol calibration gas. Emissions reported in terms of lb/hr Ethanol since it is the main OC of interest at this facility. Modified Method 308 performed concurrently, but errors in sample recovery/shipping (incorrect sample container) makes comparisons between M25A data and M308 data questionable

Tester did not complete the Section 8.3.2 procedures for EPA Method 29. Therefore, compliance with the Hg emission limitation could not be determined. Facility will retest emission unit for Hg.EPA Method 5, Section 11.2.1 procedures were not followed when the tester failed to utilize tarred weighing dishes when weighing the filters. Weighing filters directly on the balance potentially biased the reported particulate matter emissions low. Central District Office determined that the potential error introduced into the PM results would not be great enough to put the facility out of compliance.

Note that the EU ID of B001 was only used to save 3/30/06 RATA. The RATA is for the NOx CEM for the SCR. Facility wide emissions are controlled by one SCR. The emissions units venting to the SCR are B001, B002,B003,B004,B005,B006,B023,B024,B025,B026,B027,B028,B029,B030,B031,P010,P011,P012,P014,P015,P021,P032,P035, and P036.

PTI modification requested to alter permit limits now that actual operational emission data is available.

Page 367: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

T183 is listed as an insignificant emissions unit in the Title V permit. It is referred to in the emissions test report as F001.

The max that this plant can run is very close to 120 TPH due to an under sized drag slat. This test was not witnessedThe max that this plant can run is very close to 120 TPH due to an under sized drag slat. This test was not witnessed

The max that this plant can run is very close to 120 TPH due to an under sized drag slat. This test was not witnessedThe max that this plant can run is very close to 120 TPH due to an under sized drag slat. This test was not witnessed

Page 368: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PWR - Production during the test was low. Facility orders are very low. Company attributes this to slow economy. During the test, this issue was discussed and facility understands when production picks back up toward normal levels, retest will likely be required. This issue is also addressed in the letter to the facility.PWR - Production during the test was low. Facility orders are very low. Company attributes this to slow economy. During the test, this issue was discussed and facility understands when production picks back up toward normal levels, retest will likely be required. This issue is also addressed in the letter to the facility.Allowable pressure drop across the baghouse in PTI 02-20473 is 1-5 inches water. Tested at 2.3 inches water.Allowable pressure drop across the baghouse in PTI 02-20473 is 1-5 inches water. Tested at 2.3 inches water.

PTI 02-20473 specified a pressure drop range across the baghouse of 1 - 5 inches water. Tested at 1.6 inches water.PTI 02-20473 specified a pressure drop range across the baghouse of 1 - 5 inches water. Tested at 1.6 inches water.

Page 369: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

NOTE: This testing for HCl and Cl2 was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDD. This rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. HCl emissions were determined to be 0.010 lb/MM Btu and Cl2 emissions were determined to be 0.004 lb/MM Btu.

NOTE: This testing for total mercury (ash, oxidized and elemental) was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDDD. ASTM D6784-02 was used. This MACT rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of mercury were: ash - 3.94E-07; oxidized - 2.63E-06; and elemental - 4.02E-07.NOTE: This testing for HCl and Cl2 was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDD. This rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of Hcl were determined to be 0.008 lb/MM Btu and emissions of Cl2 were determined to be 0.004 lb/MM Btu.

NOTE: This testing for total mercury (ash, oxidized and elemental) was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDDD. ASTM D6784-02 was used. The MACT rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of mercury were: ash - 3.54E-07; oxidized - 2.64E-06; and elemental - 3.82E-07.

Page 370: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Failed to meet required 90% DE. However, test team had problems withwith low fuel tank due to a leak in one of the FIDs. Fuel tank run out for the second day in a row. Though operation was identical for all 3 runs, inlet and outlet readings for run #3 were not consistant with first two, probably effected by low fuel in fuel tank. Wrote facility and told them we could not accept run 3.

NOV will be sent for failure. During testing the stack test team was asked to use an inline thermocouple for filter temperature, to straighten the nozzle on 2 occasions prior to starting a run, to weigh H2O on site, to measure stack diameter as it was incorrect in the ITT. No other problems that could jeoprodize test results were observed.Following the completion of Run 3, the post test span calibration error check performed at B009 Oxidation Catalyst Inlet Duct resulted in a value outside the allowable +/-5% of the span gas value. Therefore, Run3 was voided and an additional run (Run4) was performed. The result from Run 3 did not included in the report.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. 60,000 cfm baghouse #1 controls only grinding operations (more than sufficient capacity) 2. test results were extremely lowAlthough actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Page 371: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although the 3rd run''s melt rate was low, addition of flux, removal of slag, and pouring continued. This did not appear to affect emissions significantly compared to the other 2 test runs.Although the 3rd run''s melt rate was low, addition of flux, removal of slag, and pouring continued. This did not appear to affect emissions significantly compared to the other 2 test runs.Although the 3rd run''s melt rate was low, addition of flux, removal of slag, and pouring continued. This did not appear to affect emissions significantly compared to the other 2 test runs.Concerns with test company conforming to Methods 1-4 and 26A. Runs 2&3 were acceptable; therefore, the test report was accepted.

The heat input rate of 8.57 MMBtu/hr is representative of normal operations and is considered acceptable.Method 10 CO analyzer was inoperable on test day. New analyzer being brought in. Test rescheduled for 04/18/07.

Purpose of testing was to determine PM emissions at an elevated SOGB operating temperature averaging 1580 F. Testing was performed with liquid burn.

The actual test date for this unit was 8/7/07. This unit vents to Baghouse #2 as well as the Wet Collector.

The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.

CO was also tested at a low SOGB operating temperature of 1453. The CO emission rate was 204.4 lbs/hr at this temperature. Although this exceeded the allowable rate, ISP had been granted a Discretionary Exemption from the Ohio EPA Director allowing this.DRE of >99.9965% was determined using gas-only input to SOGB. DRE was also measured at >99.996692% when both gas and liquid residue were input to SOGB.DRE of >99.996% was determined using gas-only input to SOGB. DRE was also measured at >99.997% when both gas and liquid residue were input to SOGB.

Page 372: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

This test was a self-evaluation engineering study. The results of this test will be used to help establish a PM10 limit. The results of this test cannot be used to demonstrate compliance because only two test runs were performed.

A seperate maximum source operating rate had to be calculated for each of the individual test runs, because different kinds of molds were processed and because these molds are processed at different rates. These (maximum) rates are 165 molds/hr for run 1, 229.7 molds/hr for run 2, and 262 molds/hr for run 3. The actual source operating rates were 161.5 molds/hr for run 1, 209.5 molds/hr for run 2, and 213 molds/hr for run 3.These numbers show the source was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum operating rate.

NOTE: Ohio EPA is not accepting these test results, because of a failed pitot tube leak check; also, the test was performed at only 87% of the maximum operating rate.

Page 373: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.

Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.

Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.

Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.Average tested emission rate, and permitted allowable emission rate, are for P025 and P027 combined.

Page 374: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Sauder supplied production information with the test report, which demonstrated they were operating at an acceptable fraction of their maximum process weight rate.

Sauder supplied production information with the test report, which demonstrated they were operating at an acceptable fraction of their maximum process weight rate.

Sauder has provided production information in the test report, which demonstrates this emission unit was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum process weight rate.Sauder has provided production information in the test report, which demonstrates this emission unit was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum process weight rate.

The permitted allowable emission rate was below the method detection limit; therefore this test could not be used to show the PM10 was in compliance.

The permitted allowable emission rate was below the method detection limit; therefore this test could not be used to show the PM10 was in compliance.

Page 375: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Also tested for Total Selected Metals. Average tested emission rate was 0.000567 lbs/MMBtu, vs. an allowable of 0.001 lbs/MMBtu (MACT Subpart DDDDD).

Also tested for Total Selected Metals. Average tested emission rate was 0.000567 lbs/MMBtu, vs. an allowable of 0.001 lbs/MMBtu (MACT Subpart DDDDD).Tenneco also performed a low load test, with only K004 operating. The actual VOC emission rate for the low load test was 1.65 lbs/hr, and the DRE was 92.3%. The source operating rate was 24.5 lbs VOC/hr.

A fourth test run was performed on each oxidizer, with the capture tank disabled, to verify compliance under this operating scenario. The results were 97.6% DRE (RTO 1), and 98.95% DRE (RTO 2). The average oxidizer temperatures were 1404 F (RTO 1), and 1455 F (RTO 2).

The average tested emission rate of 0.0033 gr/dscf, and the permitted allowable emission rate of 0.015 gr/dscf, are corrected to 7% oxygen, dry basis, standard conditions.

Page 376: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.

All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.

All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.All actual and allowable emission rates, and the "average tested" and "maximum" operating rates, are combined rates for P901 and P902.

Actual Emission Rates: from autoclave: 0.278 lbs/hr, 0.00058 lbs/lb rubber. from muffler (stack): 0.315 lbs/hr; 0.000655 lbs/lb rubber Test used a modified Method 15.Actual Emission Rates: from autoclave: 0.125 lbs/hr, 0.001261 lbs/lb rubber from muffler (stack): 0.038 lbs/hr; 0.000381 lbs/lb rubber Test used a modified Method 15.

Page 377: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..low production rate. one time only decision by BK that the emissions were increased by 33% (to represent 100% optimum prod rate), and the resulting number is still below the allowable emission limit..

lab technician did not hold samples in dark for 30 minutes. TES requested a re-test. This occurred on 6/28/07. Results were similar.lab technician did not hold samples in dark for 30 minutes. TES requested a re-test. This occurred on 6/28/07. Results were similar.lab technician did not hold samples in dark for 30 minutes. TES requested a re-test. This occurred on 6/28/07. Results were similar.

MACT subpart DDDDD, vacated on July 30, 2007. at this time, TDES will not require Sun to retest the heaters. However, when the Boiler MACT is re-instated or a determination is required a re-test will be requested of the three heaters.The Boiler MACT Subpart DDDDD was vacated on July 30, 2007, so a t this time, TDES will not require Sun to re-test. however, when the Boiler Mact is reinstated or a determination is required, we will require a retest of the three heaters.this was the coke burn condition. average oxygen % volume was 0.5 tests performed for MACT II performance requirements pertining to CRU''s.this was the oxidation condition. average oxygen % volume was 2.2 % vol. tests performed for MACT II performance requirements pertaining to CRU''s.ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference. slipstream open.. NOV sent our to re do stack test on this date.ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference.ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference. Method 18 for methane. also did a formaldehyde NCASI Method 98.01 with results of 0.014 lb/hr.

Page 378: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

coke burn cycle was 1.50 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.14 with a L/G ratio of 0.53coke burn cycle was 1.61 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.11 with a L/G ratio of 0.50coke burn cycle was 1.51 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.62 with a L/G ratio of 0.49coke burn cycle was 2.32 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.26 with a L/G ratio of 0.48coke burn cycle was 1.00 ppmv db where limit is less than 10 ppmv db corrected to 3% O2. Perchlorate addition cycle was 0.35 with a L/G ratio of 0.48

Page 379: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366
Page 380: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

The unit is oversized for this process which resulted in the much lower than maximum operating rate. This unit was operated at the normal maximum rate during the test.

This report presents the results of a compliance demonstration test conducted on March 15,2007 under typical operating load conditions while firing both Heavy and Light Hydrocarbon residue (HHC&LLC).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).The following sources vent to the CR baghouse - F004 (stand grinders), P014 (wheelabrator #5), P015 (wheelabrator #2), P016 (wheelabrator #4), P018 (wheelabrator #6), P021 (wheelabrator #1).

The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

LOW CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

LOW/MID CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

EFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscfEFDC tested emission rate = 0.0035 gr/dscf, WDC tested emission rate = 0.0031 gr/dscf, CDC tested emission rate = 0.0043 gr/dscf

Tested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscf

Page 381: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MID/HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy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

INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. PROCESS HAS POTENTIAL TO FEED 300 TPH BUT ENCOUNTERS BOTTLENECKS WHICH DO NOT ALLOW CONSISTENT HIGH TANK FILL RATES. OPERATING RATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN AT MAXIMUM BASED ON FILL RATES OF TANKS DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THERE WERE PAUSES BETWEEN TANKS TO ALLOW FOR TANK SWITCHING.INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. OPERATING RATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN AT MAXIMUM BASED ON HISTORICAL AVERAGE PACKING RATE OF 32 TONS PER HOUR.INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. FIRST TWO TEST RUNS AVERAGED GREATER THAN 62 TONS PACKED. THIRD RUN WAS MUCH LESS AT 40 TONS PACKED. THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARS TO HAVE RUN AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY GIVEN BOTTLENECK CONDITIONS AND COMPARISON TO HISTORICAL AVERAGE PACKING RATE OF 68 TONS PER HOUR.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 55.5 LB SO2/HR; 0.66 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 157.6 SO2/ HR; 0.1.89 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 3.15 LB PE/HR; 0.02 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.31 LB PE/ HR; 0.002PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 18.9 LB SO2/HR; 0.21 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 146 LB SO2/ HR; 1.67 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 2.12LB PE/HR; 0.014 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.35 LB PE/ HR; 0.002 PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS LIMIT THIS BOILER TO 169 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. OPERATED AT 100% PERMITTED CAPACITY. OPERATED AT 90% OF MAXIMUM STEAM LOAD.

OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS LIMIT THIS BOILER TO 169 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. OPERATED AT 100% PERMITTED CAPACITY. OPERATED AT 90% OF MAXIMUM STEAM LOAD. PARTICULATE RESULTS ACTUALLY 0.006 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT.

FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS.FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS.FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS. THE 7.3 LB/HR AS PROPANE CALCULATED FROM METHOD 25 RESULTS OF 6.0 LB/HR AS CARBON.

FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.THROUGHPUT CALCULATION BASED ON 3827 BUSHELS OF CORN PER HOUR AVERAGE DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. P002 IS LIMITED IN ITS CAPACITY DUE TO THE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF EMISSION UNIT P003. BASED ON THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT OF P003, P002 WAS NEAR ITS MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THIS WAS A RETEST OF P002 AFTER SCRUBBER REPAIR AND MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE AND REDUCE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. AS THE 2006 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION OF P002 SHOWED SO2 EMISSIONS TO BE WELL BELOW THE PERMIT ALLOWABLE, RAPCA DETERMINED THAT ANOTHER DEMONSTRATION OF SO2 FOR THIS EMISSION UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTED.

Method 18 and Method 25A used to determine VOC compliance. Method 25 was used at the inlet due to a low response factor for phenol. Method 204 was used to verify permanent total enclosure.

Page 382: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THIS IS A TEMPORARY/RENTAL BOILER USED IN TIMES WHEN BACKUP IS NECESSARY OR PRIMARY BOILERS ARE INOPERABLE DUE TO MAINTENANCE OUTAGE. THIS BOILER REQUIRED MAINTENANCE AND RETESTED IN MAY 2007.

THIS IS A TEMPORARY/RENTAL BOILER USED IN TIMES WHEN BACKUP IS NECESSARY OR PRIMARY BOILERS ARE INOPERABLE DUE TO MAINTENANCE OUTAGE. THIS BOILER WAS RETUNED AND FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION AMONG OTHER CHANGES IMPROVED ITS PERFORMANCE WHILE LIMITING THE MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.FIRED ON 100% COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. BASED ON CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, RAPCA CALCULATED HEAT INPUT TO BE 597 MMBTU/HR.FIRED ON 100% COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. BASED ON CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, RAPCA CALCULATED HEAT INPUT TO BE 597 MMBTU/HR.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

RAPCA CALCULATION OF HEAT INPUT 594 MMBTU/HR. 100% COAL FIRED DURING COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engeneering testins and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS..PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.

Page 383: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

P001 and P002 are vented to the same control device and have the same exhaust stack, both EUs were tested simultaneously. The tested emission rate passed both P001 and P002 individual emission limitations, thus, the tested rate also passed when the emission limits were combined.

P001 and P002 are vented to the same control device and have the same exhaust stack, both EUs were tested simultaneously. The tested emission rate passed both P001 and P002 individual emission limitations, thus, the tested rate also passed when the emission limits were combined.

The permit states that the max PWR is 3.6 dry sludge tons/hour. However, that is for "polymer conditioned, centrifuge dewatered" sludge. On the day of the test run, Southerly only burned "thermally conditioned" dry sludge. The max PWR for thermally conditioned dry sludge is 2.7 dry sludge tons/hour. Therefore Southerly did operate near max capacity for the type of sludge they were burning on the day of the test.

The test had one run that resulted in the inlets emissions being less than the outlet emissions. Based on a previous similiar testing situation at another facility, CDAQ decided that this would not invalidate this test, and that compliance was demonstrated with the appropriate emissions limitation.

" From 2003 to 2007 different products such as 2.0L block, 3.0L/3.8L bearing cap and the 3.0L flywheel were produced not currently used to make engine blocks the above MACT test was conducted at the maximum production rate for producing bearing caps (maximum 17 tons iron/hour) which has been the sustained cycle rate since Feb., 2007." 15.5/17(100) = 91.2% meets the above 90% criteria

* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/18/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/19/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/20/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/21/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.

Page 384: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Opacity limits for crusher are as above. Opacity limits for transfer points is 10% opacity as a six-minute average.

In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for SO2 was conducted to determine an emission rate.

In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance.In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for CO was conducted to determine an emission rate.In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for VOC was conducted to determine an emission rate.

HCl testing was completed as a pre-MACT test and was not conducted for compliance. Emission rates in permit limit HCl to 21.4 lbs/hr. Since this was not a compliance test, Miller Brewery opted not to test iokinetically.

Mercury testing was conducted as pre-MACT testing and was not conducted for compliance. No Hg limitations in permit.The test was invalidated due to isokinetics ranging from 82.4-84.2. Particulate analytical data did not match the data used to calculate the reported emission rate. Reported emission rate was .0065 lb/mmbtu. The emission rate based on the analytical data was 0.19 lb/mmbtu.Mercury testing was conducted as pre-MACT testing and was not conducted for compliance. No Hg limitations in permit.HCl testing was completed as a pre-MACT test and was not conducted for compliance. Emission rates in permit limit HCl to 21.4 lbs/hr. Since this was not a compliance test, Miller Brewery opted not to test iokinetically.

Allowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sent

Page 385: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Absolute Value of the average difference between reference method for O2 and Facility CEM data was 0.05%

THE TEMPERATURE OF THE GAS AT THE CATALYST INLET WAS 675 DEGREES F AND THE PRESSURE DROP WAS 7.5".THE TEMPERATURE OF THE GAS AT THE CATALYST INLET WAS 678 DEGREES F AND THE PRESSURE DROP WAS 7.4".

THE PEN FOR THE OPACITY CHART RECORDER WAS BROKEN DURING THIS TEST. THE PEN HAD CLEARLY BEEN STUCK ON 2.9% OPACITY FOR DAYS. THE OPACITY MONITOR AND DAS WERE STILL READING AND OPERATING PROPERLY, AND WERE WITHIN OPERATING LIMITS. THE CHART READOUT WILL NOT SERVE AS A BACKUP TO THE DAS HOWEVER UNTIL THE PEN IS FIXED. THE OBSERVER TOLD THE FACILITY TO FIX THE PEN. THE NEXT OBSERVER THAT GOES TO THE ANNUAL TEST FOR THIS UNIT SHOULD CHECK TO MAKE SURE THIS HAS BEEN FIXED.

AVERAGE EMISSION RATE FROM SINGLE BOTHS APPLIED TO THIRD DUPLEX BOOTH - ACID WASHAVERAGE EMISSION RATE FROM SINGLE BOTHS APPLIED TO THIRD DUPLEX BOOTH - ACID WASH

Page 386: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE CATALYST ON THIS OXIDIZER WAS REPLACED IN JANUARY 2007 FOLLOWING A FAILED TEST.

THIS TEST WAS ACTUALLY PERFORMED ON 8/23/07. CO CATALYST TEMPERATURE DURING TESTING WAS 497 DEG F.

THE FACILITY HAS ALSO ADDED A CARBON MONOXIDE CONTINUOUS MONITOR TO THIS SOURCE FOR THEIR OWN USE, NOT FOR COMPLIANCE PURPOSES.THE FACILITY HAS ALSO ADDED A CARBON MONOXIDE CONTINUOUS MONITOR TO THIS SOURCE FOR THEIR OWN USE, NOT FOR COMPLIANCE PURPOSES.

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE LOW LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 6/26/07.

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE HIGH & MID LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 5/29/07.

HCDOES that the best way to determine compliance is to monitor coal usage and chlorine content of the coal.

Page 387: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THIS TEST WAS CONDUCTED PER 40 CFR 60.18(f). THE APPLICABLE RULE REQUIRES A MINIMUM NET HEATING VALUE OF THE WASTE GAS AND LIMITS THE EXIT VELOCITY (DEPENDANT ON THE BTU VALUE OF THE WASTE GAS). METHOD 3C WAS EMPLOYED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS TEST.

THIS RETEST PERFORMED DUE TO A FAILED COMPLAINCE TEST IN AUGUST 2005 (CO AND SO2 RETEST)THIS RETEST PERFORMED DUE TO A FAILED COMPLAINCE TEST IN AUGUST 2005 (CO AND SO2 RETEST)A TEMPORARY TOTAL ENCLOSURE WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF K006 (PRESS #5). THE TTE MET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF METHOD 204. SEE OBSERVER''S REPORT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.METHOD 25A WAS APPROVED FOR DE TESTING ON THIS SOURCE BECAUSE ONLY A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENT IS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT. IF A LB/HR REQUIREMENT IS EVER IMPLEMENTED, THE SOURCE MAY BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM M25.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRESS COATER 1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 98.8% FOR C-5 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.

METHOD 19 USED TO DETERMINE STACK GAS FLOW-RATE; IN FUTURE METHOD 1-4 SHOULD BE USEDMETHOD 19 USED TO DETERMINE STACK GAS FLOW-RATE; IN FUTURE METHOD 1-4 SHOULD BE USED

METHOD 19 USED TO DETERMINE STACK GAS FLOW-RATE; IN FUTURE METHOD 1-4 SHOULD BE USEDMETHOD 19 USED TO DETERMINE STACK GAS FLOW-RATE; IN FUTURE METHOD 1-4 SHOULD BE USED

Testing for total organics was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with Method 25A and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions. Total Organic concentration determined by method 25A was 6.55 lb/hr.Testing was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with this test and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions.

Page 388: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.

THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.

THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.

Discovered during 04/15/10 FCE that the most recent emissions test results had not been entered into CETA. CEMS exhaust gas VOC equivalency concentration for 10 mg OC per liter of gasoline loaded was determined to be 0.68%.

Full production effort produced additional 2,000 LBS/HR, however, did not exceed emission rate permitted.

Failed PM10 and efficiency at 97.6 % instead of 99.9 %; test was invalid due to incorrect PTI calling for test of 6 EU P040 -P046 instead of 4 EUs P040 -P044. Retest for PM10 using RM201.

Amine based VOC compound, N, N-Dimethylisopropylamine (DMIPA). Pressure drop to be revised to 3.0 - 4.0 in. H2O in next application.D021 BH replaced the permitted D015 scrubber shutdown on P005 (with PWR of 50,000 lbs/hr sand), and now connected to three (3) additional EU''s P009, P010 & P012 (from D010 BH shutdown) to the new D021 BH using the same P005 emissions limit of 2.67 lbs/hr PE, but with increased operating rate.

BH DP range was slightly lower due to clean new bags at 3.66 - 5.54 in. H2O. Broken bag detector tested satisfactory. Achieved > 60 dscf for all 3 runs. Fugitive emissions passed and acceptable to MACT EEEEE total metal HAP - - see ID # 6887.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This test was for PM10. The compliance method in the permit stated to conduct Method 5 test and then conduct a particle size distribution on the material collected on the Method 5 filter to determine the portion that was PM10. That PM10 portion was to be added to this method 202 result. The Particle Size distribution was not able to be conducted because the sample size on the method 5 filter was too small. Therefore, this PM10 test is invalid. If assume all the Method 5 result is equal to PM10 size, then the Method 5 plus the Method 202 average becomes 5.47 lbs/hr which exceeds the PM10 allowable rate. A re-test is scheduled for 12/12/2007 to utilize Methods 201A & 202 for PM10 analysis.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. The permit also has a PM concentration limit of 0.005grains /dscf leaving the baghouse. Test results were 0.0094 grains/dscf. This was calculated from the PM mass measurement using Method 5. No separate testing was done.This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This emission unit is controlled by a baghouse, which was where the SO2 was measured, even though no control of the pollutant is expected. The compliance method for this permit is to control the amount of sulfur additions per a 3 hour period. 3 test runs were conducted at 1 hour each, so the combined total was used to provide the lbs SO2 per 3 hour period as stated in the permit.PM10 is the sum of the filterable PM10 and condensable PM10. Method 201A was used to determine filterable PM10, and Method 202 used for condensible PM10. All condensible PM caught in the impinger wash is assumed to be PM10 and smaller.The permit also has a PM concentration limit of 0.005grains /dscf leaving the baghouse. Test results were 0.00131 grains/dscf. This was calculated from the PM mass measurement using Method 5. No separate testing was done.

The report was dated 8/20/07 to the customer. The testing company said in its letter that Longaberger should send the report to us along with any other test data in their possession on their company letterhead. I believe this was the reason that we didn''t receive the report until 9/4/07 (little late).

Fugitive VEs were taken as well. For P128 & P129 Building: average = 9.15 % as a 3 min average of the 3 test runs. For P128 & P129 operations: Average = 0%.

Page 389: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Todd Scarborough was on site for about an hour in order to show the AGO how an asphalt plant operates.

Todd Scarborough was on site for about an hour in order to show the AGO how an asphalt plant operates.Todd Scarborough was on site for about an hour in order to show the AGO how an asphalt plant operates.Todd Scarborough was on site for about an hour in order to show the AGO how an asphalt plant operates.

Primary CEM had a Relative Accuracy (RA) of 0.069 for the lbs/hr, secondary CEM had a RA of 0.0226% for lbs/hr, the RA of the flow was 1.613%, the primary CEM had a RA of 0.036% for the ppmvw, and the secondary CEM had a RA of 0.140% for the ppmvw. The emissions unit operated at 50% of the maximum operating rate during the RATA.

Page 390: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

The PTE was demonstrated by continuous differential pressure readings recorded on a dataogger. At the end of the test the PTE was confirmed by observation of inward flow of smole at natural draft openings at the rear service door, a loading dock door and the entrance to the cafeteria. The digital readout of the differential pressure fluctuated from 0.002 to 0.02 during periodic observation while the test was in progress.The inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr wtih the maximum of 58.5 lbs OC/hr and a minimum of 32.8 lbs OC/hr. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate without supplemental solvent charge. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.

Page 391: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Dimethyl ether triplicate analysis on inlet sample averaged 96% recovery. Stack gases averaged 71.7 lbs/hr at inlet and 0.4 lb/hr at outlet. CI inlet temperature averaged 311.3 C, outlet temp averaged 521.6 C with delta T equal to 210.3 dgrees CUSEPA approved the use Method 323 prior to the test. Duplicate analysis of 3rd run inlet sample was within 10%. Field blank sample reported as no detectable. Requested that laboratory report any analysis of spiked sample for accuracy and precision..

USEPA approved the use of Method 308 prior to test. Two methanol spiked samples at 1.98 mg in blank impinger water had 97% and 98% recovery. The sampling blank impinger solution was reported at no detectable and the laboratory blank was reported at the detection limit of 0.01 mg. The silica gel tube sampling blank was reported at no detectable, with no breakthrough reported in 2 of the outlet sampling tubes. Stack samples averaged 0.8 lb/hr at inlet and 0.002 lb/hr at outlet.Tester failed to prepare equipment that conformed to previously cited requirements of method 26A (no stainless steel allowed in the sample probe). This was after 5 months of preparation/negotiation leading up to test.

Method 320 with FTIR failed spike recovery with 63% reported below minimum of 70% required. Failure to achieve hourly allowable attributed to TO bed temperature of 618 C compare to 650 C normal operating remperature.

Page 392: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

These test results were entered during the TV renewal process in July 2013. The results were not comprehensively reviewed for compliance with the methods as 6 years had passed between receipt of the results and entering the data into Stars2 (the results were never entered into CETA). The report indicates an average combustion chamber temperature of 1516.0 deg F which would establish an operating threshold of greater than or equal to 1466.0 deg F (-50 deg F) within the combustion chamber in order to comply with the permit requirements. The report does not include information about audit samples and was not stamped with a received date (the received date indicated above is an estimate). Also, Natalie Jalil witnessed the tests but is not available in the picklist b/c she is not an active Stars2 user.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.

According to the PTI application , the maximum amount of coating and lining applied per hour is 5.92 gallons. During the test, 5.5 gallons/hour of coating/lining was applied and 165.7 lids per hour were coated and lined. Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.According to the PTI application , the maximum amount of coating and lining applied per hour is 5.92 gallons. During the test, 5.5 gallons/hour of coating/lining was applied and 165.7 lids per hour were coated and lined. Emission limits: K001- 1.75lbs/hr; K002- 2.85 lbs VOC/hr; K003- 0.6 lbs VOC/hr.

Page 393: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Testing to comply with Title V permit. There was some confusion as to what limit applied. There were two limits listed in the Title V permit, one that refers to 3745-75-02(K) found in the table of emissionslimits and another in the testing section that is a modificaiton of this rule to make it less stringent. Both of these emissions limitations differed from the federal rule limit, which is less stringent than both the state rule and the limitation found in the testing section. This confusion will be corrected during the next Title V renewal.

CO failed but was re-tested on February 9, 2007 with a passing result. Fiberizer nat. gas feed too rich and facility emission estimates based on engineering calculations because there was no plant operational data or previous testing to base permit limits upon.

Tester performed response factor analysis to convert ppm Propane to ppm Ethanol per EPA Method 25A. Response factor of 2.36 using an ethanol calibration gas. Emissions reported in terms of lb/hr Ethanol since it is the main OC of interest at this facility. Modified Method 308 performed concurrently, but errors in sample recovery/shipping (incorrect sample container) makes comparisons between M25A data and M308 data questionable

EPA Method 5, Section 11.2.1 procedures were not followed when the tester failed to utilize tarred weighing dishes when weighing the filters. Weighing filters directly on the balance potentially biased the reported particulate matter emissions low. Central District Office determined that the potential error introduced into the PM results would not be great enough to put the facility out of compliance.

Note that the EU ID of B001 was only used to save 3/30/06 RATA. The RATA is for the NOx CEM for the SCR. Facility wide emissions are controlled by one SCR. The emissions units venting to the SCR are B001, B002,B003,B004,B005,B006,B023,B024,B025,B026,B027,B028,B029,B030,B031,P010,P011,P012,P014,P015,P021,P032,P035, and P036.

Page 394: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PWR - Production during the test was low. Facility orders are very low. Company attributes this to slow economy. During the test, this issue was discussed and facility understands when production picks back up toward normal levels, retest will likely be required. This issue is also addressed in the letter to the facility.PWR - Production during the test was low. Facility orders are very low. Company attributes this to slow economy. During the test, this issue was discussed and facility understands when production picks back up toward normal levels, retest will likely be required. This issue is also addressed in the letter to the facility.

Page 395: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

NOTE: This testing for HCl and Cl2 was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDD. This rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. HCl emissions were determined to be 0.010 lb/MM Btu and Cl2 emissions were determined to be 0.004 lb/MM Btu.

NOTE: This testing for total mercury (ash, oxidized and elemental) was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDDD. ASTM D6784-02 was used. This MACT rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of mercury were: ash - 3.94E-07; oxidized - 2.63E-06; and elemental - 4.02E-07.NOTE: This testing for HCl and Cl2 was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDD. This rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of Hcl were determined to be 0.008 lb/MM Btu and emissions of Cl2 were determined to be 0.004 lb/MM Btu.

NOTE: This testing for total mercury (ash, oxidized and elemental) was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDDD. ASTM D6784-02 was used. The MACT rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of mercury were: ash - 3.54E-07; oxidized - 2.64E-06; and elemental - 3.82E-07.

Page 396: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Failed to meet required 90% DE. However, test team had problems withwith low fuel tank due to a leak in one of the FIDs. Fuel tank run out for the second day in a row. Though operation was identical for all 3 runs, inlet and outlet readings for run #3 were not consistant with first two, probably effected by low fuel in fuel tank. Wrote facility and told them we could not accept run 3.

NOV will be sent for failure. During testing the stack test team was asked to use an inline thermocouple for filter temperature, to straighten the nozzle on 2 occasions prior to starting a run, to weigh H2O on site, to measure stack diameter as it was incorrect in the ITT. No other problems that could jeoprodize test results were observed.Following the completion of Run 3, the post test span calibration error check performed at B009 Oxidation Catalyst Inlet Duct resulted in a value outside the allowable +/-5% of the span gas value. Therefore, Run3 was voided and an additional run (Run4) was performed. The result from Run 3 did not included in the report.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. 60,000 cfm baghouse #1 controls only grinding operations (more than sufficient capacity) 2. test results were extremely lowAlthough actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Page 397: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.The purpose of this test was to aid in demonstrating initial compliance with the Miscellaneous Metal Parts MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart MMMM). The testing was therefore performed at representative not maximum operations.

CO was also tested at a low SOGB operating temperature of 1453. The CO emission rate was 204.4 lbs/hr at this temperature. Although this exceeded the allowable rate, ISP had been granted a Discretionary Exemption from the Ohio EPA Director allowing this.

Page 398: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

This test was a self-evaluation engineering study. The results of this test will be used to help establish a PM10 limit. The results of this test cannot be used to demonstrate compliance because only two test runs were performed.

A seperate maximum source operating rate had to be calculated for each of the individual test runs, because different kinds of molds were processed and because these molds are processed at different rates. These (maximum) rates are 165 molds/hr for run 1, 229.7 molds/hr for run 2, and 262 molds/hr for run 3. The actual source operating rates were 161.5 molds/hr for run 1, 209.5 molds/hr for run 2, and 213 molds/hr for run 3.These numbers show the source was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum operating rate.

Page 399: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Tenneco also performed a low load test, with only K004 operating. The actual VOC emission rate for the low load test was 1.65 lbs/hr, and the DRE was 92.3%. The source operating rate was 24.5 lbs VOC/hr.

A fourth test run was performed on each oxidizer, with the capture tank disabled, to verify compliance under this operating scenario. The results were 97.6% DRE (RTO 1), and 98.95% DRE (RTO 2). The average oxidizer temperatures were 1404 F (RTO 1), and 1455 F (RTO 2).

Page 400: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366
Page 401: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MACT subpart DDDDD, vacated on July 30, 2007. at this time, TDES will not require Sun to retest the heaters. However, when the Boiler MACT is re-instated or a determination is required a re-test will be requested of the three heaters.The Boiler MACT Subpart DDDDD was vacated on July 30, 2007, so a t this time, TDES will not require Sun to re-test. however, when the Boiler Mact is reinstated or a determination is required, we will require a retest of the three heaters.

ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference. slipstream open.. NOV sent our to re do stack test on this date.ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference.ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference. Method 18 for methane. also did a formaldehyde NCASI Method 98.01 with results of 0.014 lb/hr.

Page 402: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366
Page 403: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

This report presents the results of a compliance demonstration test conducted on March 15,2007 under typical operating load conditions while firing both Heavy and Light Hydrocarbon residue (HHC&LLC).

The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)The following sources vent to FMDC - P005 (stand grinders), P009 (shotblaster #1 ), P906 (Disa #1), P910 (Disa #2), P912 (shotblaster #2), P913 (electric holding furnace), P014 (shotblaster #3), P915 (electric furnace c), P916 (electric furnace A), P917 (electric furnace B)

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

LOW CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

LOW/MID CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

Tested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscfTested emission rate for FMDC = 0.0044 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for SSDC = 0.0037 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for EFDC = 0.0034 gr/dscf, tested emission rate for WCC = 0.0035 gr/dscf

Page 404: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MID/HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy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

INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. PROCESS HAS POTENTIAL TO FEED 300 TPH BUT ENCOUNTERS BOTTLENECKS WHICH DO NOT ALLOW CONSISTENT HIGH TANK FILL RATES. OPERATING RATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN AT MAXIMUM BASED ON FILL RATES OF TANKS DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THERE WERE PAUSES BETWEEN TANKS TO ALLOW FOR TANK SWITCHING.INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. OPERATING RATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN AT MAXIMUM BASED ON HISTORICAL AVERAGE PACKING RATE OF 32 TONS PER HOUR.INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. FIRST TWO TEST RUNS AVERAGED GREATER THAN 62 TONS PACKED. THIRD RUN WAS MUCH LESS AT 40 TONS PACKED. THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARS TO HAVE RUN AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY GIVEN BOTTLENECK CONDITIONS AND COMPARISON TO HISTORICAL AVERAGE PACKING RATE OF 68 TONS PER HOUR.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 55.5 LB SO2/HR; 0.66 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 157.6 SO2/ HR; 0.1.89 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 3.15 LB PE/HR; 0.02 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.31 LB PE/ HR; 0.002PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 18.9 LB SO2/HR; 0.21 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 146 LB SO2/ HR; 1.67 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 2.12LB PE/HR; 0.014 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.35 LB PE/ HR; 0.002 PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS LIMIT THIS BOILER TO 169 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. OPERATED AT 100% PERMITTED CAPACITY. OPERATED AT 90% OF MAXIMUM STEAM LOAD. PARTICULATE RESULTS ACTUALLY 0.006 LB PE/MMBTU HEAT INPUT.

FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS.FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS.FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS. THE 7.3 LB/HR AS PROPANE CALCULATED FROM METHOD 25 RESULTS OF 6.0 LB/HR AS CARBON.

FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.THROUGHPUT CALCULATION BASED ON 3827 BUSHELS OF CORN PER HOUR AVERAGE DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. P002 IS LIMITED IN ITS CAPACITY DUE TO THE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF EMISSION UNIT P003. BASED ON THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT OF P003, P002 WAS NEAR ITS MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THIS WAS A RETEST OF P002 AFTER SCRUBBER REPAIR AND MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE AND REDUCE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. AS THE 2006 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION OF P002 SHOWED SO2 EMISSIONS TO BE WELL BELOW THE PERMIT ALLOWABLE, RAPCA DETERMINED THAT ANOTHER DEMONSTRATION OF SO2 FOR THIS EMISSION UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTED.

Method 18 and Method 25A used to determine VOC compliance. Method 25 was used at the inlet due to a low response factor for phenol. Method 204 was used to verify permanent total enclosure.

Page 405: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THIS IS A TEMPORARY/RENTAL BOILER USED IN TIMES WHEN BACKUP IS NECESSARY OR PRIMARY BOILERS ARE INOPERABLE DUE TO MAINTENANCE OUTAGE. THIS BOILER REQUIRED MAINTENANCE AND RETESTED IN MAY 2007.

THIS IS A TEMPORARY/RENTAL BOILER USED IN TIMES WHEN BACKUP IS NECESSARY OR PRIMARY BOILERS ARE INOPERABLE DUE TO MAINTENANCE OUTAGE. THIS BOILER WAS RETUNED AND FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION AMONG OTHER CHANGES IMPROVED ITS PERFORMANCE WHILE LIMITING THE MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engeneering testins and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS..PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.

Page 406: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

P001 and P002 are vented to the same control device and have the same exhaust stack, both EUs were tested simultaneously. The tested emission rate passed both P001 and P002 individual emission limitations, thus, the tested rate also passed when the emission limits were combined.

P001 and P002 are vented to the same control device and have the same exhaust stack, both EUs were tested simultaneously. The tested emission rate passed both P001 and P002 individual emission limitations, thus, the tested rate also passed when the emission limits were combined.

The permit states that the max PWR is 3.6 dry sludge tons/hour. However, that is for "polymer conditioned, centrifuge dewatered" sludge. On the day of the test run, Southerly only burned "thermally conditioned" dry sludge. The max PWR for thermally conditioned dry sludge is 2.7 dry sludge tons/hour. Therefore Southerly did operate near max capacity for the type of sludge they were burning on the day of the test.

The test had one run that resulted in the inlets emissions being less than the outlet emissions. Based on a previous similiar testing situation at another facility, CDAQ decided that this would not invalidate this test, and that compliance was demonstrated with the appropriate emissions limitation.

" From 2003 to 2007 different products such as 2.0L block, 3.0L/3.8L bearing cap and the 3.0L flywheel were produced not currently used to make engine blocks the above MACT test was conducted at the maximum production rate for producing bearing caps (maximum 17 tons iron/hour) which has been the sustained cycle rate since Feb., 2007." 15.5/17(100) = 91.2% meets the above 90% criteria

* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/18/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/19/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/20/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* NOTE: The real/actual test date was 5/17/2007. The test date has been indicated above as 5/21/2007 for CETA to accept this data entry. CETA would not accept this data entry with the actual 5/17/2007 date.* The test report reported results of stack tests on 3 emissions units, the last of which was stack tested on 6/1/07. In addition, DiGeronimo asked for about a week''s extension to submit the test report. Therefore, the test report was received on time.

Page 407: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for SO2 was conducted to determine an emission rate.

In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance.In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for CO was conducted to determine an emission rate.In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for VOC was conducted to determine an emission rate.

HCl testing was completed as a pre-MACT test and was not conducted for compliance. Emission rates in permit limit HCl to 21.4 lbs/hr. Since this was not a compliance test, Miller Brewery opted not to test iokinetically.

The test was invalidated due to isokinetics ranging from 82.4-84.2. Particulate analytical data did not match the data used to calculate the reported emission rate. Reported emission rate was .0065 lb/mmbtu. The emission rate based on the analytical data was 0.19 lb/mmbtu.

HCl testing was completed as a pre-MACT test and was not conducted for compliance. Emission rates in permit limit HCl to 21.4 lbs/hr. Since this was not a compliance test, Miller Brewery opted not to test iokinetically.

Allowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sent

Page 408: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE PEN FOR THE OPACITY CHART RECORDER WAS BROKEN DURING THIS TEST. THE PEN HAD CLEARLY BEEN STUCK ON 2.9% OPACITY FOR DAYS. THE OPACITY MONITOR AND DAS WERE STILL READING AND OPERATING PROPERLY, AND WERE WITHIN OPERATING LIMITS. THE CHART READOUT WILL NOT SERVE AS A BACKUP TO THE DAS HOWEVER UNTIL THE PEN IS FIXED. THE OBSERVER TOLD THE FACILITY TO FIX THE PEN. THE NEXT OBSERVER THAT GOES TO THE ANNUAL TEST FOR THIS UNIT SHOULD CHECK TO MAKE SURE THIS HAS BEEN FIXED.

Page 409: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE LOW LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 6/26/07.

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE HIGH & MID LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 5/29/07.

Page 410: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THIS TEST WAS CONDUCTED PER 40 CFR 60.18(f). THE APPLICABLE RULE REQUIRES A MINIMUM NET HEATING VALUE OF THE WASTE GAS AND LIMITS THE EXIT VELOCITY (DEPENDANT ON THE BTU VALUE OF THE WASTE GAS). METHOD 3C WAS EMPLOYED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS TEST.

A TEMPORARY TOTAL ENCLOSURE WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE CAPTURE EFFICIENCY OF K006 (PRESS #5). THE TTE MET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF METHOD 204. SEE OBSERVER''S REPORT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.METHOD 25A WAS APPROVED FOR DE TESTING ON THIS SOURCE BECAUSE ONLY A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENT IS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT. IF A LB/HR REQUIREMENT IS EVER IMPLEMENTED, THE SOURCE MAY BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM M25.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRESS COATER 1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 98.8% FOR C-5 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.TESTING INVALIDATED - FACILITY USED LOW VOC CONTENT VARNISH INSTEAD OF MINIMUM 75% VOC. RESULTS INCONCLUSIVE - INLET OF OXIDIZER LOWER VOC LOADING THAN OUTLET.

Testing for total organics was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with Method 25A and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions. Total Organic concentration determined by method 25A was 6.55 lb/hr.Testing was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with this test and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions.

Page 411: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.

THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.

THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.THE INITIAL TEST REPORT HAD SEVERAL MISTAKES THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED, SO A REVISED REPORT WAS REQUESTED. THE FINAL REVISED REPORT WAS RECEVIED DECEMBER 10, 2007. THIS TEST HAS BEEN POSTPONED SEVERAL TIMES SINCE OCTOBER 2006.

Discovered during 04/15/10 FCE that the most recent emissions test results had not been entered into CETA. CEMS exhaust gas VOC equivalency concentration for 10 mg OC per liter of gasoline loaded was determined to be 0.68%.

D021 BH replaced the permitted D015 scrubber shutdown on P005 (with PWR of 50,000 lbs/hr sand), and now connected to three (3) additional EU''s P009, P010 & P012 (from D010 BH shutdown) to the new D021 BH using the same P005 emissions limit of 2.67 lbs/hr PE, but with increased operating rate.

BH DP range was slightly lower due to clean new bags at 3.66 - 5.54 in. H2O. Broken bag detector tested satisfactory. Achieved > 60 dscf for all 3 runs. Fugitive emissions passed and acceptable to MACT EEEEE total metal HAP - - see ID # 6887.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This test was for PM10. The compliance method in the permit stated to conduct Method 5 test and then conduct a particle size distribution on the material collected on the Method 5 filter to determine the portion that was PM10. That PM10 portion was to be added to this method 202 result. The Particle Size distribution was not able to be conducted because the sample size on the method 5 filter was too small. Therefore, this PM10 test is invalid. If assume all the Method 5 result is equal to PM10 size, then the Method 5 plus the Method 202 average becomes 5.47 lbs/hr which exceeds the PM10 allowable rate. A re-test is scheduled for 12/12/2007 to utilize Methods 201A & 202 for PM10 analysis.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. The permit also has a PM concentration limit of 0.005grains /dscf leaving the baghouse. Test results were 0.0094 grains/dscf. This was calculated from the PM mass measurement using Method 5. No separate testing was done.This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This emission unit is controlled by a baghouse, which was where the SO2 was measured, even though no control of the pollutant is expected. The compliance method for this permit is to control the amount of sulfur additions per a 3 hour period. 3 test runs were conducted at 1 hour each, so the combined total was used to provide the lbs SO2 per 3 hour period as stated in the permit.PM10 is the sum of the filterable PM10 and condensable PM10. Method 201A was used to determine filterable PM10, and Method 202 used for condensible PM10. All condensible PM caught in the impinger wash is assumed to be PM10 and smaller.The permit also has a PM concentration limit of 0.005grains /dscf leaving the baghouse. Test results were 0.00131 grains/dscf. This was calculated from the PM mass measurement using Method 5. No separate testing was done.

The report was dated 8/20/07 to the customer. The testing company said in its letter that Longaberger should send the report to us along with any other test data in their possession on their company letterhead. I believe this was the reason that we didn''t receive the report until 9/4/07 (little late).

Page 412: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Primary CEM had a Relative Accuracy (RA) of 0.069 for the lbs/hr, secondary CEM had a RA of 0.0226% for lbs/hr, the RA of the flow was 1.613%, the primary CEM had a RA of 0.036% for the ppmvw, and the secondary CEM had a RA of 0.140% for the ppmvw. The emissions unit operated at 50% of the maximum operating rate during the RATA.

Page 413: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

The PTE was demonstrated by continuous differential pressure readings recorded on a dataogger. At the end of the test the PTE was confirmed by observation of inward flow of smole at natural draft openings at the rear service door, a loading dock door and the entrance to the cafeteria. The digital readout of the differential pressure fluctuated from 0.002 to 0.02 during periodic observation while the test was in progress.The inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr wtih the maximum of 58.5 lbs OC/hr and a minimum of 32.8 lbs OC/hr. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate without supplemental solvent charge. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.The combined inlet loading averaged 46.1 lbs OC/hr and the outlet averaged 14.8 lbs OC/hr for an average 66.9% destruction across the thermal oxidizer during 3 runs. The testing was conducted to coincide with the maximum production rate. The FID passed all drift checks at both the low (49.7 ppm) and high (475.7 ppm) propane calibration gases during all three runs.

Page 414: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

USEPA approved the use of Method 308 prior to test. Two methanol spiked samples at 1.98 mg in blank impinger water had 97% and 98% recovery. The sampling blank impinger solution was reported at no detectable and the laboratory blank was reported at the detection limit of 0.01 mg. The silica gel tube sampling blank was reported at no detectable, with no breakthrough reported in 2 of the outlet sampling tubes. Stack samples averaged 0.8 lb/hr at inlet and 0.002 lb/hr at outlet.

Page 415: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

These test results were entered during the TV renewal process in July 2013. The results were not comprehensively reviewed for compliance with the methods as 6 years had passed between receipt of the results and entering the data into Stars2 (the results were never entered into CETA). The report indicates an average combustion chamber temperature of 1516.0 deg F which would establish an operating threshold of greater than or equal to 1466.0 deg F (-50 deg F) within the combustion chamber in order to comply with the permit requirements. The report does not include information about audit samples and was not stamped with a received date (the received date indicated above is an estimate). Also, Natalie Jalil witnessed the tests but is not available in the picklist b/c she is not an active Stars2 user.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.This test was performed in December 2007, but the flow rates were inconsistent and had errors associated with them. Follow-up flow measurements were performed, but this testing was delayed becuse the facility rarely operates at their maximum rates. Flow rate report received on 1/15/2009 and reviewed. Flow rates now are measured consistently and more accurately.

Page 416: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Testing to comply with Title V permit. There was some confusion as to what limit applied. There were two limits listed in the Title V permit, one that refers to 3745-75-02(K) found in the table of emissionslimits and another in the testing section that is a modificaiton of this rule to make it less stringent. Both of these emissions limitations differed from the federal rule limit, which is less stringent than both the state rule and the limitation found in the testing section. This confusion will be corrected during the next Title V renewal.

Tester performed response factor analysis to convert ppm Propane to ppm Ethanol per EPA Method 25A. Response factor of 2.36 using an ethanol calibration gas. Emissions reported in terms of lb/hr Ethanol since it is the main OC of interest at this facility. Modified Method 308 performed concurrently, but errors in sample recovery/shipping (incorrect sample container) makes comparisons between M25A data and M308 data questionable

EPA Method 5, Section 11.2.1 procedures were not followed when the tester failed to utilize tarred weighing dishes when weighing the filters. Weighing filters directly on the balance potentially biased the reported particulate matter emissions low. Central District Office determined that the potential error introduced into the PM results would not be great enough to put the facility out of compliance.

Note that the EU ID of B001 was only used to save 3/30/06 RATA. The RATA is for the NOx CEM for the SCR. Facility wide emissions are controlled by one SCR. The emissions units venting to the SCR are B001, B002,B003,B004,B005,B006,B023,B024,B025,B026,B027,B028,B029,B030,B031,P010,P011,P012,P014,P015,P021,P032,P035, and P036.

Page 417: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PWR - Production during the test was low. Facility orders are very low. Company attributes this to slow economy. During the test, this issue was discussed and facility understands when production picks back up toward normal levels, retest will likely be required. This issue is also addressed in the letter to the facility.PWR - Production during the test was low. Facility orders are very low. Company attributes this to slow economy. During the test, this issue was discussed and facility understands when production picks back up toward normal levels, retest will likely be required. This issue is also addressed in the letter to the facility.

Page 418: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

NOTE: This testing for HCl and Cl2 was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDD. This rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. HCl emissions were determined to be 0.010 lb/MM Btu and Cl2 emissions were determined to be 0.004 lb/MM Btu.

NOTE: This testing for total mercury (ash, oxidized and elemental) was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDDD. ASTM D6784-02 was used. This MACT rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of mercury were: ash - 3.94E-07; oxidized - 2.63E-06; and elemental - 4.02E-07.NOTE: This testing for HCl and Cl2 was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDD. This rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of Hcl were determined to be 0.008 lb/MM Btu and emissions of Cl2 were determined to be 0.004 lb/MM Btu.

NOTE: This testing for total mercury (ash, oxidized and elemental) was conducted to demonstrate compliance with the risk based standard in MACT subpart DDDDD. ASTM D6784-02 was used. The MACT rule has been remanded back to US EPA to be rewritten. Emissions of mercury were: ash - 3.54E-07; oxidized - 2.64E-06; and elemental - 3.82E-07.

Page 419: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Failed to meet required 90% DE. However, test team had problems withwith low fuel tank due to a leak in one of the FIDs. Fuel tank run out for the second day in a row. Though operation was identical for all 3 runs, inlet and outlet readings for run #3 were not consistant with first two, probably effected by low fuel in fuel tank. Wrote facility and told them we could not accept run 3.

NOV will be sent for failure. During testing the stack test team was asked to use an inline thermocouple for filter temperature, to straighten the nozzle on 2 occasions prior to starting a run, to weigh H2O on site, to measure stack diameter as it was incorrect in the ITT. No other problems that could jeoprodize test results were observed.Following the completion of Run 3, the post test span calibration error check performed at B009 Oxidation Catalyst Inlet Duct resulted in a value outside the allowable +/-5% of the span gas value. Therefore, Run3 was voided and an additional run (Run4) was performed. The result from Run 3 did not included in the report.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Page 420: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.Although actual melt rate was somewhat low, this test is being accepted due to the following: 1. The test results were extremely low. 2. The main sources are the 3 melting furnaces which now have a new baghouse installed to control them which will be tested soon. This will also free up more air volume for the other units from this baghouse.

Page 421: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

A seperate maximum source operating rate had to be calculated for each of the individual test runs, because different kinds of molds were processed and because these molds are processed at different rates. These (maximum) rates are 165 molds/hr for run 1, 229.7 molds/hr for run 2, and 262 molds/hr for run 3. The actual source operating rates were 161.5 molds/hr for run 1, 209.5 molds/hr for run 2, and 213 molds/hr for run 3.These numbers show the source was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum operating rate.

Page 422: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366
Page 423: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

ffailed test due to the temperature for the resin plant incinerator. for any 3 hr block of time, the temp shall not be more than 50 degrees F below the avg temp. they had a hard time meeting this temp difference. Method 18 for methane. also did a formaldehyde NCASI Method 98.01 with results of 0.014 lb/hr.

Page 424: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

LOW CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

LOW/MID CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

Page 425: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MID/HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy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

INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. PROCESS HAS POTENTIAL TO FEED 300 TPH BUT ENCOUNTERS BOTTLENECKS WHICH DO NOT ALLOW CONSISTENT HIGH TANK FILL RATES. OPERATING RATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN AT MAXIMUM BASED ON FILL RATES OF TANKS DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THERE WERE PAUSES BETWEEN TANKS TO ALLOW FOR TANK SWITCHING.

INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. FIRST TWO TEST RUNS AVERAGED GREATER THAN 62 TONS PACKED. THIRD RUN WAS MUCH LESS AT 40 TONS PACKED. THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARS TO HAVE RUN AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY GIVEN BOTTLENECK CONDITIONS AND COMPARISON TO HISTORICAL AVERAGE PACKING RATE OF 68 TONS PER HOUR.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 55.5 LB SO2/HR; 0.66 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 157.6 SO2/ HR; 0.1.89 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 3.15 LB PE/HR; 0.02 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.31 LB PE/ HR; 0.002PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 18.9 LB SO2/HR; 0.21 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 146 LB SO2/ HR; 1.67 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 2.12LB PE/HR; 0.014 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.35 LB PE/ HR; 0.002 PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

FUEL OIL SAMPLES GRABBED AND COMPOSITED DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH CONTAMINANT LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS UPON ANALYSIS. THE 7.3 LB/HR AS PROPANE CALCULATED FROM METHOD 25 RESULTS OF 6.0 LB/HR AS CARBON.

USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.THROUGHPUT CALCULATION BASED ON 3827 BUSHELS OF CORN PER HOUR AVERAGE DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. P002 IS LIMITED IN ITS CAPACITY DUE TO THE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF EMISSION UNIT P003. BASED ON THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT OF P003, P002 WAS NEAR ITS MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THIS WAS A RETEST OF P002 AFTER SCRUBBER REPAIR AND MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE AND REDUCE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. AS THE 2006 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION OF P002 SHOWED SO2 EMISSIONS TO BE WELL BELOW THE PERMIT ALLOWABLE, RAPCA DETERMINED THAT ANOTHER DEMONSTRATION OF SO2 FOR THIS EMISSION UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTED.

Page 426: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THIS IS A TEMPORARY/RENTAL BOILER USED IN TIMES WHEN BACKUP IS NECESSARY OR PRIMARY BOILERS ARE INOPERABLE DUE TO MAINTENANCE OUTAGE. THIS BOILER WAS RETUNED AND FLUE GAS RECIRCULATION AMONG OTHER CHANGES IMPROVED ITS PERFORMANCE WHILE LIMITING THE MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engeneering testins and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS..PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.

Page 427: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

The permit states that the max PWR is 3.6 dry sludge tons/hour. However, that is for "polymer conditioned, centrifuge dewatered" sludge. On the day of the test run, Southerly only burned "thermally conditioned" dry sludge. The max PWR for thermally conditioned dry sludge is 2.7 dry sludge tons/hour. Therefore Southerly did operate near max capacity for the type of sludge they were burning on the day of the test.

" From 2003 to 2007 different products such as 2.0L block, 3.0L/3.8L bearing cap and the 3.0L flywheel were produced not currently used to make engine blocks the above MACT test was conducted at the maximum production rate for producing bearing caps (maximum 17 tons iron/hour) which has been the sustained cycle rate since Feb., 2007." 15.5/17(100) = 91.2% meets the above 90% criteria

Page 428: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for SO2 was conducted to determine an emission rate.

In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance.In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for CO was conducted to determine an emission rate.In an effort to fix cyclonic flow problems a straightening vane was added to stack causing a disturbance in the scrubber. The emission rate during the test was an anomily and not representative of real stack gas conditions. The test must be repeated with a different alternative to reduce cyclonic flow to determine compliance. Testing for VOC was conducted to determine an emission rate.

Allowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sent

Page 429: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE PEN FOR THE OPACITY CHART RECORDER WAS BROKEN DURING THIS TEST. THE PEN HAD CLEARLY BEEN STUCK ON 2.9% OPACITY FOR DAYS. THE OPACITY MONITOR AND DAS WERE STILL READING AND OPERATING PROPERLY, AND WERE WITHIN OPERATING LIMITS. THE CHART READOUT WILL NOT SERVE AS A BACKUP TO THE DAS HOWEVER UNTIL THE PEN IS FIXED. THE OBSERVER TOLD THE FACILITY TO FIX THE PEN. THE NEXT OBSERVER THAT GOES TO THE ANNUAL TEST FOR THIS UNIT SHOULD CHECK TO MAKE SURE THIS HAS BEEN FIXED.

Page 430: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE LOW LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 6/26/07.

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE HIGH & MID LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 5/29/07.

Page 431: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THIS TEST WAS CONDUCTED PER 40 CFR 60.18(f). THE APPLICABLE RULE REQUIRES A MINIMUM NET HEATING VALUE OF THE WASTE GAS AND LIMITS THE EXIT VELOCITY (DEPENDANT ON THE BTU VALUE OF THE WASTE GAS). METHOD 3C WAS EMPLOYED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS TEST.

CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRESS COATER 1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 98.8% FOR C-5 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

Testing for total organics was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with Method 25A and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions. Total Organic concentration determined by method 25A was 6.55 lb/hr.Testing was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with this test and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions.

Page 432: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

D021 BH replaced the permitted D015 scrubber shutdown on P005 (with PWR of 50,000 lbs/hr sand), and now connected to three (3) additional EU''s P009, P010 & P012 (from D010 BH shutdown) to the new D021 BH using the same P005 emissions limit of 2.67 lbs/hr PE, but with increased operating rate.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This test was for PM10. The compliance method in the permit stated to conduct Method 5 test and then conduct a particle size distribution on the material collected on the Method 5 filter to determine the portion that was PM10. That PM10 portion was to be added to this method 202 result. The Particle Size distribution was not able to be conducted because the sample size on the method 5 filter was too small. Therefore, this PM10 test is invalid. If assume all the Method 5 result is equal to PM10 size, then the Method 5 plus the Method 202 average becomes 5.47 lbs/hr which exceeds the PM10 allowable rate. A re-test is scheduled for 12/12/2007 to utilize Methods 201A & 202 for PM10 analysis.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. The permit also has a PM concentration limit of 0.005grains /dscf leaving the baghouse. Test results were 0.0094 grains/dscf. This was calculated from the PM mass measurement using Method 5. No separate testing was done.This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This emission unit is controlled by a baghouse, which was where the SO2 was measured, even though no control of the pollutant is expected. The compliance method for this permit is to control the amount of sulfur additions per a 3 hour period. 3 test runs were conducted at 1 hour each, so the combined total was used to provide the lbs SO2 per 3 hour period as stated in the permit.

Page 433: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Primary CEM had a Relative Accuracy (RA) of 0.069 for the lbs/hr, secondary CEM had a RA of 0.0226% for lbs/hr, the RA of the flow was 1.613%, the primary CEM had a RA of 0.036% for the ppmvw, and the secondary CEM had a RA of 0.140% for the ppmvw. The emissions unit operated at 50% of the maximum operating rate during the RATA.

Page 434: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

The PTE was demonstrated by continuous differential pressure readings recorded on a dataogger. At the end of the test the PTE was confirmed by observation of inward flow of smole at natural draft openings at the rear service door, a loading dock door and the entrance to the cafeteria. The digital readout of the differential pressure fluctuated from 0.002 to 0.02 during periodic observation while the test was in progress.

Page 435: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

USEPA approved the use of Method 308 prior to test. Two methanol spiked samples at 1.98 mg in blank impinger water had 97% and 98% recovery. The sampling blank impinger solution was reported at no detectable and the laboratory blank was reported at the detection limit of 0.01 mg. The silica gel tube sampling blank was reported at no detectable, with no breakthrough reported in 2 of the outlet sampling tubes. Stack samples averaged 0.8 lb/hr at inlet and 0.002 lb/hr at outlet.

Page 436: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

These test results were entered during the TV renewal process in July 2013. The results were not comprehensively reviewed for compliance with the methods as 6 years had passed between receipt of the results and entering the data into Stars2 (the results were never entered into CETA). The report indicates an average combustion chamber temperature of 1516.0 deg F which would establish an operating threshold of greater than or equal to 1466.0 deg F (-50 deg F) within the combustion chamber in order to comply with the permit requirements. The report does not include information about audit samples and was not stamped with a received date (the received date indicated above is an estimate). Also, Natalie Jalil witnessed the tests but is not available in the picklist b/c she is not an active Stars2 user.

Page 437: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Testing to comply with Title V permit. There was some confusion as to what limit applied. There were two limits listed in the Title V permit, one that refers to 3745-75-02(K) found in the table of emissionslimits and another in the testing section that is a modificaiton of this rule to make it less stringent. Both of these emissions limitations differed from the federal rule limit, which is less stringent than both the state rule and the limitation found in the testing section. This confusion will be corrected during the next Title V renewal.

Tester performed response factor analysis to convert ppm Propane to ppm Ethanol per EPA Method 25A. Response factor of 2.36 using an ethanol calibration gas. Emissions reported in terms of lb/hr Ethanol since it is the main OC of interest at this facility. Modified Method 308 performed concurrently, but errors in sample recovery/shipping (incorrect sample container) makes comparisons between M25A data and M308 data questionable

Page 438: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

A seperate maximum source operating rate had to be calculated for each of the individual test runs, because different kinds of molds were processed and because these molds are processed at different rates. These (maximum) rates are 165 molds/hr for run 1, 229.7 molds/hr for run 2, and 262 molds/hr for run 3. The actual source operating rates were 161.5 molds/hr for run 1, 209.5 molds/hr for run 2, and 213 molds/hr for run 3.These numbers show the source was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum operating rate.

Page 439: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366
Page 440: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

LOW CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

LOW/MID CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

Page 441: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MID/HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy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

INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. PROCESS HAS POTENTIAL TO FEED 300 TPH BUT ENCOUNTERS BOTTLENECKS WHICH DO NOT ALLOW CONSISTENT HIGH TANK FILL RATES. OPERATING RATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN AT MAXIMUM BASED ON FILL RATES OF TANKS DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THERE WERE PAUSES BETWEEN TANKS TO ALLOW FOR TANK SWITCHING.

INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. FIRST TWO TEST RUNS AVERAGED GREATER THAN 62 TONS PACKED. THIRD RUN WAS MUCH LESS AT 40 TONS PACKED. THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARS TO HAVE RUN AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY GIVEN BOTTLENECK CONDITIONS AND COMPARISON TO HISTORICAL AVERAGE PACKING RATE OF 68 TONS PER HOUR.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 55.5 LB SO2/HR; 0.66 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 157.6 SO2/ HR; 0.1.89 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 3.15 LB PE/HR; 0.02 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.31 LB PE/ HR; 0.002PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 18.9 LB SO2/HR; 0.21 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 146 LB SO2/ HR; 1.67 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 2.12LB PE/HR; 0.014 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.35 LB PE/ HR; 0.002 PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.THROUGHPUT CALCULATION BASED ON 3827 BUSHELS OF CORN PER HOUR AVERAGE DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. P002 IS LIMITED IN ITS CAPACITY DUE TO THE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF EMISSION UNIT P003. BASED ON THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT OF P003, P002 WAS NEAR ITS MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THIS WAS A RETEST OF P002 AFTER SCRUBBER REPAIR AND MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE AND REDUCE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. AS THE 2006 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION OF P002 SHOWED SO2 EMISSIONS TO BE WELL BELOW THE PERMIT ALLOWABLE, RAPCA DETERMINED THAT ANOTHER DEMONSTRATION OF SO2 FOR THIS EMISSION UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTED.

Page 442: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engeneering testins and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS..PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.

Page 443: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

The permit states that the max PWR is 3.6 dry sludge tons/hour. However, that is for "polymer conditioned, centrifuge dewatered" sludge. On the day of the test run, Southerly only burned "thermally conditioned" dry sludge. The max PWR for thermally conditioned dry sludge is 2.7 dry sludge tons/hour. Therefore Southerly did operate near max capacity for the type of sludge they were burning on the day of the test.

Page 444: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Allowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sent

Page 445: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE PEN FOR THE OPACITY CHART RECORDER WAS BROKEN DURING THIS TEST. THE PEN HAD CLEARLY BEEN STUCK ON 2.9% OPACITY FOR DAYS. THE OPACITY MONITOR AND DAS WERE STILL READING AND OPERATING PROPERLY, AND WERE WITHIN OPERATING LIMITS. THE CHART READOUT WILL NOT SERVE AS A BACKUP TO THE DAS HOWEVER UNTIL THE PEN IS FIXED. THE OBSERVER TOLD THE FACILITY TO FIX THE PEN. THE NEXT OBSERVER THAT GOES TO THE ANNUAL TEST FOR THIS UNIT SHOULD CHECK TO MAKE SURE THIS HAS BEEN FIXED.

Page 446: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE LOW LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 6/26/07.

THE HIGH AND MID LOAD FLOW TESTS WERE INITIALLY 13.0 & 9.6% RA RESPECTIVELY. A FACTOR WAS ADDED TO THE CEMS AIR FLOW CALCULATION AND A LOW LOAD FLOW RATA WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY ITS ACCURACY, AS REQUIRED. THE RA SHOWN ABOVE INCLUDES THE USE OF THIS FACTOR. ALSO, SEE THE RECORD FOR THE HIGH & MID LOAD FLOW RATA PERFORMED ON 5/29/07.

Page 447: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRESS COATER 1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 98.8% FOR C-5 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

Testing for total organics was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with Method 25A and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions. Total Organic concentration determined by method 25A was 6.55 lb/hr.Testing was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with this test and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions.

Page 448: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This test was for PM10. The compliance method in the permit stated to conduct Method 5 test and then conduct a particle size distribution on the material collected on the Method 5 filter to determine the portion that was PM10. That PM10 portion was to be added to this method 202 result. The Particle Size distribution was not able to be conducted because the sample size on the method 5 filter was too small. Therefore, this PM10 test is invalid. If assume all the Method 5 result is equal to PM10 size, then the Method 5 plus the Method 202 average becomes 5.47 lbs/hr which exceeds the PM10 allowable rate. A re-test is scheduled for 12/12/2007 to utilize Methods 201A & 202 for PM10 analysis.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This emission unit is controlled by a baghouse, which was where the SO2 was measured, even though no control of the pollutant is expected. The compliance method for this permit is to control the amount of sulfur additions per a 3 hour period. 3 test runs were conducted at 1 hour each, so the combined total was used to provide the lbs SO2 per 3 hour period as stated in the permit.

Page 449: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

These test results were entered during the TV renewal process in July 2013. The results were not comprehensively reviewed for compliance with the methods as 6 years had passed between receipt of the results and entering the data into Stars2 (the results were never entered into CETA). The report indicates an average combustion chamber temperature of 1516.0 deg F which would establish an operating threshold of greater than or equal to 1466.0 deg F (-50 deg F) within the combustion chamber in order to comply with the permit requirements. The report does not include information about audit samples and was not stamped with a received date (the received date indicated above is an estimate). Also, Natalie Jalil witnessed the tests but is not available in the picklist b/c she is not an active Stars2 user.

Page 450: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Testing to comply with Title V permit. There was some confusion as to what limit applied. There were two limits listed in the Title V permit, one that refers to 3745-75-02(K) found in the table of emissionslimits and another in the testing section that is a modificaiton of this rule to make it less stringent. Both of these emissions limitations differed from the federal rule limit, which is less stringent than both the state rule and the limitation found in the testing section. This confusion will be corrected during the next Title V renewal.

Page 451: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

A seperate maximum source operating rate had to be calculated for each of the individual test runs, because different kinds of molds were processed and because these molds are processed at different rates. These (maximum) rates are 165 molds/hr for run 1, 229.7 molds/hr for run 2, and 262 molds/hr for run 3. The actual source operating rates were 161.5 molds/hr for run 1, 209.5 molds/hr for run 2, and 213 molds/hr for run 3.These numbers show the source was operating at an acceptable fraction of its maximum operating rate.

Page 452: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

LOW CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

LOW/MID CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

Page 453: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MID/HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy) HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES. NOX = 2.18 LB/HR.HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. PROCESS HAS POTENTIAL TO FEED 300 TPH BUT ENCOUNTERS BOTTLENECKS WHICH DO NOT ALLOW CONSISTENT HIGH TANK FILL RATES. OPERATING RATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN AT MAXIMUM BASED ON FILL RATES OF TANKS DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THERE WERE PAUSES BETWEEN TANKS TO ALLOW FOR TANK SWITCHING.

INITIAL COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO MEET CONDITIONS OF PTI 08-04737. NO SPECIFIC MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE OR CONDITION. FIRST TWO TEST RUNS AVERAGED GREATER THAN 62 TONS PACKED. THIRD RUN WAS MUCH LESS AT 40 TONS PACKED. THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION APPEARS TO HAVE RUN AT MAXIMUM CAPACITY GIVEN BOTTLENECK CONDITIONS AND COMPARISON TO HISTORICAL AVERAGE PACKING RATE OF 68 TONS PER HOUR.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 55.5 LB SO2/HR; 0.66 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 157.6 SO2/ HR; 0.1.89 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 3.15 LB PE/HR; 0.02 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.31 LB PE/ HR; 0.002PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 18.9 LB SO2/HR; 0.21 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 146 LB SO2/ HR; 1.67 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 2.12LB PE/HR; 0.014 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.35 LB PE/ HR; 0.002 PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.THROUGHPUT CALCULATION BASED ON 3827 BUSHELS OF CORN PER HOUR AVERAGE DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. P002 IS LIMITED IN ITS CAPACITY DUE TO THE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF EMISSION UNIT P003. BASED ON THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT OF P003, P002 WAS NEAR ITS MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THIS WAS A RETEST OF P002 AFTER SCRUBBER REPAIR AND MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE AND REDUCE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. AS THE 2006 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION OF P002 SHOWED SO2 EMISSIONS TO BE WELL BELOW THE PERMIT ALLOWABLE, RAPCA DETERMINED THAT ANOTHER DEMONSTRATION OF SO2 FOR THIS EMISSION UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTED.

Page 454: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engineering tests and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.

PASS/FAIL is not applicable in this test scenario. This condensible particulate data was voluntarily submitted by DPL OHH Hutchings Station per RAPCA request and was not intended to be used for any compliance determination. This data obtained during preliminary engeneering testins and is comprised of only one test run. In addition, the HEAT INPUT values were determined using the coal feed rates during the condensible sampling calculated with the heat content of the coal samples collected on the day of the actual compliance demonstration and therefore not exact.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS..PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.

Page 455: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Allowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sent

Page 456: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE PEN FOR THE OPACITY CHART RECORDER WAS BROKEN DURING THIS TEST. THE PEN HAD CLEARLY BEEN STUCK ON 2.9% OPACITY FOR DAYS. THE OPACITY MONITOR AND DAS WERE STILL READING AND OPERATING PROPERLY, AND WERE WITHIN OPERATING LIMITS. THE CHART READOUT WILL NOT SERVE AS A BACKUP TO THE DAS HOWEVER UNTIL THE PEN IS FIXED. THE OBSERVER TOLD THE FACILITY TO FIX THE PEN. THE NEXT OBSERVER THAT GOES TO THE ANNUAL TEST FOR THIS UNIT SHOULD CHECK TO MAKE SURE THIS HAS BEEN FIXED.

Page 457: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366
Page 458: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRESS COATER 1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR C-5 ON 11/6/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 99.8% CAPTURE FOR C-5. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 98.8% FOR C-5 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

Testing for total organics was conducted with an FID calibrated with propane. A response factor was added to the measured concentrations to convert ppm as propane to ppm as ethanol. An emission rate was determined with ppm as ethanol. Pfizer claims that their emission composition is 95% ethanol and 5% methanol. A modified Method 308 with GC analysis was conducted concurrently with Method 25A and it was determined that methanol composition was 6% of total organic emissions. Total Organic concentration determined by method 25A was 6.55 lb/hr.

Page 459: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This test was for PM10. The compliance method in the permit stated to conduct Method 5 test and then conduct a particle size distribution on the material collected on the Method 5 filter to determine the portion that was PM10. That PM10 portion was to be added to this method 202 result. The Particle Size distribution was not able to be conducted because the sample size on the method 5 filter was too small. Therefore, this PM10 test is invalid. If assume all the Method 5 result is equal to PM10 size, then the Method 5 plus the Method 202 average becomes 5.47 lbs/hr which exceeds the PM10 allowable rate. A re-test is scheduled for 12/12/2007 to utilize Methods 201A & 202 for PM10 analysis.

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This emission unit is controlled by a baghouse, which was where the SO2 was measured, even though no control of the pollutant is expected. The compliance method for this permit is to control the amount of sulfur additions per a 3 hour period. 3 test runs were conducted at 1 hour each, so the combined total was used to provide the lbs SO2 per 3 hour period as stated in the permit.

Page 460: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

These test results were entered during the TV renewal process in July 2013. The results were not comprehensively reviewed for compliance with the methods as 6 years had passed between receipt of the results and entering the data into Stars2 (the results were never entered into CETA). The report indicates an average combustion chamber temperature of 1516.0 deg F which would establish an operating threshold of greater than or equal to 1466.0 deg F (-50 deg F) within the combustion chamber in order to comply with the permit requirements. The report does not include information about audit samples and was not stamped with a received date (the received date indicated above is an estimate). Also, Natalie Jalil witnessed the tests but is not available in the picklist b/c she is not an active Stars2 user.

Page 461: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

LOW CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

LOW/MID CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

Page 462: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MID/HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy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

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 55.5 LB SO2/HR; 0.66 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 157.6 SO2/ HR; 0.1.89 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 3.15 LB PE/HR; 0.02 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.31 LB PE/ HR; 0.002PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 18.9 LB SO2/HR; 0.21 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 146 LB SO2/ HR; 1.67 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 2.12LB PE/HR; 0.014 LB PE/TON KILN FEED. BYPASS STACK = 0.35 LB PE/ HR; 0.002 PE/ TON KILN FEED. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23 -10/24/2007.

USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.USED WORSE CASE HIGHEST VOC CONTAINING COATING. RESULTS INDICATE PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE PRESENT WITH 100% CAPTURE WITH GREATER THAN 99% DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY FROM THERMAL OXIDIZER. PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL AND INWARD DRAFT CONFIRMED. GREATER THAN -0.007" H20 INWARD DRAFT AVERAGED ACROSS NATURAL DRAFT OPENINGS. THREE SAMPLING SITES UTILIZED = 2 INLETS TO OXIDIZER AND 1 OXIDIZER EXHAUST USED TO DETERMINE DE. THE EXHAUST RESULTS WERE 0.42 LB/HR CARBON, 0.51 LB/HR C3H8.FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.THROUGHPUT CALCULATION BASED ON 3827 BUSHELS OF CORN PER HOUR AVERAGE DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. P002 IS LIMITED IN ITS CAPACITY DUE TO THE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF EMISSION UNIT P003. BASED ON THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT OF P003, P002 WAS NEAR ITS MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THIS WAS A RETEST OF P002 AFTER SCRUBBER REPAIR AND MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE AND REDUCE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. AS THE 2006 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION OF P002 SHOWED SO2 EMISSIONS TO BE WELL BELOW THE PERMIT ALLOWABLE, RAPCA DETERMINED THAT ANOTHER DEMONSTRATION OF SO2 FOR THIS EMISSION UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTED.

Page 463: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS..PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION TO VERIFY DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF THE REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHILE ESTABLISHING A NEW OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THIS RTO IS THE COMMON CONTROL TO THE FOLLOWING UNITS: P051-P053, P505-P514, P520, P524, P529, P532, P535, P537-P539, T010. 20% EMISSION UNITS DID NOT OPERATE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION HOWEVER THE REMAINING UNITS OPERATED AT MAX. USEPA METHOD 18 USED FOR DETERMINATION OF METHANE CONTENT AND SUBTRACTED FROM 25A RESULTS.

Page 464: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

Allowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sentAllowable fugitive emissions are calculated by test methods and mass balance. Fugitive emissions consist of VOC retained on paint booth filters and baffles and fugitive emissions from paint booths. The fugitive emissions are the difference between the VOC in paints and the captured emissions in adsorber. The destruction efficiency tests consist of methods 25 & 25Aconducted simultaneously & at same location. Because either one or both methods may fail because of high moisture content in gas stream. The VOC emissions are the product of the response factor of 1.41 and the emissions as propane. adsorber is shut down and desorbed with steam. stripped OC are sent

Page 465: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

THE PEN FOR THE OPACITY CHART RECORDER WAS BROKEN DURING THIS TEST. THE PEN HAD CLEARLY BEEN STUCK ON 2.9% OPACITY FOR DAYS. THE OPACITY MONITOR AND DAS WERE STILL READING AND OPERATING PROPERLY, AND WERE WITHIN OPERATING LIMITS. THE CHART READOUT WILL NOT SERVE AS A BACKUP TO THE DAS HOWEVER UNTIL THE PEN IS FIXED. THE OBSERVER TOLD THE FACILITY TO FIX THE PEN. THE NEXT OBSERVER THAT GOES TO THE ANNUAL TEST FOR THIS UNIT SHOULD CHECK TO MAKE SURE THIS HAS BEEN FIXED.

Page 466: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366
Page 467: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRESS COATER 1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

Page 468: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This test was for PM10. The compliance method in the permit stated to conduct Method 5 test and then conduct a particle size distribution on the material collected on the Method 5 filter to determine the portion that was PM10. That PM10 portion was to be added to this method 202 result. The Particle Size distribution was not able to be conducted because the sample size on the method 5 filter was too small. Therefore, this PM10 test is invalid. If assume all the Method 5 result is equal to PM10 size, then the Method 5 plus the Method 202 average becomes 5.47 lbs/hr which exceeds the PM10 allowable rate. A re-test is scheduled for 12/12/2007 to utilize Methods 201A & 202 for PM10 analysis.

Page 469: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

These test results were entered during the TV renewal process in July 2013. The results were not comprehensively reviewed for compliance with the methods as 6 years had passed between receipt of the results and entering the data into Stars2 (the results were never entered into CETA). The report indicates an average combustion chamber temperature of 1516.0 deg F which would establish an operating threshold of greater than or equal to 1466.0 deg F (-50 deg F) within the combustion chamber in order to comply with the permit requirements. The report does not include information about audit samples and was not stamped with a received date (the received date indicated above is an estimate). Also, Natalie Jalil witnessed the tests but is not available in the picklist b/c she is not an active Stars2 user.

Page 470: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

LOW CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

LOW/MID CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

Page 471: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MID/HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy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

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 55.5 LB SO2/HR; 0.66 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 157.6 SO2/ HR; 0.1.89 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 18.9 LB SO2/HR; 0.21 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 146 LB SO2/ HR; 1.67 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.THROUGHPUT CALCULATION BASED ON 3827 BUSHELS OF CORN PER HOUR AVERAGE DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. P002 IS LIMITED IN ITS CAPACITY DUE TO THE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF EMISSION UNIT P003. BASED ON THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT OF P003, P002 WAS NEAR ITS MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THIS WAS A RETEST OF P002 AFTER SCRUBBER REPAIR AND MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE AND REDUCE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. AS THE 2006 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION OF P002 SHOWED SO2 EMISSIONS TO BE WELL BELOW THE PERMIT ALLOWABLE, RAPCA DETERMINED THAT ANOTHER DEMONSTRATION OF SO2 FOR THIS EMISSION UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTED.

Page 472: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.

Page 473: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366
Page 474: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PRESS COATER 1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY SHOWN ABOVE IS CALCULATED BY COMBINING THESE RESULTS WITH A DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY OF 99.0%, DETERMINED THROUGH TESTING ON 11/8/08 FOR THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL.CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

Page 475: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This test was for PM10. The compliance method in the permit stated to conduct Method 5 test and then conduct a particle size distribution on the material collected on the Method 5 filter to determine the portion that was PM10. That PM10 portion was to be added to this method 202 result. The Particle Size distribution was not able to be conducted because the sample size on the method 5 filter was too small. Therefore, this PM10 test is invalid. If assume all the Method 5 result is equal to PM10 size, then the Method 5 plus the Method 202 average becomes 5.47 lbs/hr which exceeds the PM10 allowable rate. A re-test is scheduled for 12/12/2007 to utilize Methods 201A & 202 for PM10 analysis.

Page 476: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

LOW CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

LOW/MID CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

Page 477: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

MID/HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy) HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES. NOX = 2.18 LB/HR.HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 55.5 LB SO2/HR; 0.66 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 157.6 SO2/ HR; 0.1.89 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

RESULTS ABOVE REPRESENT COMBINED TOTAL OF KILN MAIN STACK SAMPLING WITH ALKALI BYPASS STACK SAMPLING DURING RAW MILL ON CONDITION. INDIVIDUAL RESULTS FOLLOW: KILN MAIN STACK = 18.9 LB SO2/HR; 0.21 LB SO2/TON CLINKER. BYPASS STACK = 146 LB SO2/ HR; 1.67 LB SO2/ TON CLINKER. THERE IS NOT DISTINCT OPERATIONAL RESTRICTION. CLINKER PRODUCTION IS LIMITED BY KILN FEED RATES, TYPE OF RAW MATERIAL USED, FUEL TYPE, AND CONDITION OF KILN. FUEL TYPE DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS 100% PETROLEUM COKE. THE SAME TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING RAW MILL OFF CONDITION. THOSE RESULTS AVAILABLE IN AN ADDITIONAL APPENDIX K FILE. TESTING UNDER BOTH CONDITIONS OCCURED FROM 10/23-10/24/2007.

FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.THROUGHPUT CALCULATION BASED ON 3827 BUSHELS OF CORN PER HOUR AVERAGE DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. P002 IS LIMITED IN ITS CAPACITY DUE TO THE DOWNSTREAM PRODUCTION CAPACITY OF EMISSION UNIT P003. BASED ON THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT OF P003, P002 WAS NEAR ITS MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THIS WAS A RETEST OF P002 AFTER SCRUBBER REPAIR AND MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE AND REDUCE PARTICULATE EMISSIONS. AS THE 2006 COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION OF P002 SHOWED SO2 EMISSIONS TO BE WELL BELOW THE PERMIT ALLOWABLE, RAPCA DETERMINED THAT ANOTHER DEMONSTRATION OF SO2 FOR THIS EMISSION UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTED.

Page 478: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.

Page 479: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

Page 480: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

This stack test was discovered during the FCE on 08/27/2010 by Terri Dzienis to not be contained in CETA, so it was entered. This test was for PM10. The compliance method in the permit stated to conduct Method 5 test and then conduct a particle size distribution on the material collected on the Method 5 filter to determine the portion that was PM10. That PM10 portion was to be added to this method 202 result. The Particle Size distribution was not able to be conducted because the sample size on the method 5 filter was too small. Therefore, this PM10 test is invalid. If assume all the Method 5 result is equal to PM10 size, then the Method 5 plus the Method 202 average becomes 5.47 lbs/hr which exceeds the PM10 allowable rate. A re-test is scheduled for 12/12/2007 to utilize Methods 201A & 202 for PM10 analysis.

Page 481: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

Page 482: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy) HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES. NOX = 2.18 LB/HR.

FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.

Page 483: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.FIRED ON COAL DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. 585.1 MMBTU/HR BASED ON RAPCA OBSERVATIONS. STACK TEST REPORT REFLECTS FACILITY MEASUREMENTS AND SHOWS 585.6 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT. BASED ON THE RAPCA CALCULATIONS OF HEAT INPUT, THIS BOILER OPERATED AT 79.5% OF MAXIMUM OPERATING CAPACITY. THIS IS AN IMPROVEMENT OF THE NOVEMBER 2006 TEST AT 71% CAPACITY. ADDITIONALLY, RAPCA USES PULVERIZER AMPERAGE AS AN INDICATOR OF OPERATING CAPACITY. TO THAT END, RAPCA OBSERVED PULVERIZER MILLS OPERATING AT APPROXIMATELY 40 AMPS DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. DPL STATES NORMAL OPERATIONS TO VARY BETWEEN 40 AND 45 AMPS. DURING THE FINAL 7 MINUTES OF THE FINAL TEST RUN, DPL LOST MILL B DUE TO A SHEARED PIN.

Page 484: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

CAPTURE TESTING WAS PERFORMED FOR PC-1 ON 11/7/07 USING METHOD 25A AND 204 WITH TTE. TEST RESULTS SHOW 100% CAPTURE FOR PC-1. THE OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY RESULTS ABOVE, SHOW AN OVERALL CONTROL OF 99.0% FOR PC-1 WITH THE NEW REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER WHICH SERVES LINES K007, K008, K009 AND K044. SINCE K008 (PC-2) IS IDENTICAL TO K007, IT WAS AGREED PRIOR TO TESTING THAT CAPTURE AND OVERALL CONTROL EFFICIENCY RESULTS FROM K007 COULD BE APPLIED TO K008 AS WELL. PC-3 IS CONFIGURED DIFFERENTLY AND ONLY RUNS COMPLIANT INKS, SO CAPTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED FOR THIS SOURCE, HOWEVER, PC-1, PC-2, PC-3 AND C-5 WERE ALL OPERATING SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING THIS DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY TESTING.

Page 485: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

Page 486: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy) HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES. NOX = 2.18 LB/HR.

FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.UNITS K007-K015, K017, AND K020 COMPRISE THE METAL INSERT PREP LINE WITH PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. EACH UNIT IS ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE (PTE) AND ALL OF THESE UNITS SHARE A COMMON CONTROL. K015 DID NOT HAVE PRODUCTION DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AND DID NOT OPERATE. PTE WAS VERIFIED ONCE AGAIN DURING THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. PERMITTED MAXIMUM OF 184 LB VOC APPLIED IS COLLECTIVE OF ALL UNITS IN THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION AS IS THE ACTUAL OF 109 LBS VOC APPLIED. THIS DEMONSTRATION WAS FOLLOWUP TO INVALIDATED TESTING PERFORMED MARCH 29, 2006. TESTED DURING 60% OF MAXIMUM CAPACITY DUE TO DECREASING PRODUCTION AT FACILITY. AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION WILL TRIGGER ADDITIONAL RETEST. DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY AVERAGED 98.6%. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AVERAGE 86.3%.

Page 487: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

K006 MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. AFTER THE ENCLOSURE THE PARTS FUNNEL THROUGH A CURING OVEN DRIVING OFF 20% OF THE VOC''s AS THE CURING OVEN IS NOT PERMANENT TOTAL ENCLOSURE. THE REMAINING 80% ARE VENTED TO THE CARBON ADSORBER. THIS TEST CONDUCTED WHILE OPERATING UNDER SCENARIO 2 - COATING OPERATION WITH CURE OVEN P006 EMPLOYED AND CARBON ADSORVER EMPLOYED. PRIMARY POINT OF COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER 90% REMOVAL EFFICIENCY ACHIEVED WITH USE OF CARBON ADSORBER. TO THAT END - COMPANY USED HIGH VOC COATING (RUBY RED PAINT) AND COATED AT INITIALLY A LOW OPERATING RATE INCREASING DURING THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. COMPANY MONITORS VOC TO AND FROM CARBON ADSORBER VIA PID. THE PID APPEARED TO BE INACCURATE. THE COMPANY WILL BE MAKING IMPROVMENTS TO PID LOCATIONS. PERMIT CHANGES WILL REFLECT NEW MAXIMUM OPERATING RATE.

Page 488: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy) HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES. NOX = 2.18 LB/HR.

FACILITY IS EQUIPPED WITH A VAPOR CONTROL BLADDER TANK HOWEVER IT WAS DISCONNECTED FOR THIS COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION SO AS NOT TO CREATE A PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR ITS USE AFTER THE COMPLIANCE DEMONSTRATION. THE PERMITTED MAXIMUM STATED ABOVE DOES NOT TO APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REACHED AT THIS FACILITY. BASED ON PREVIOUS 3 YEARS OF OPERATION, THERE HAS BEEN DECREASING DEMAND FOR OPERATION AT THIS TERMINAL. MAXIMUM 6 HOUR LOADING RATE OF GASOLINE SINCE 2004 WAS 67,494 GALLONS BASED ON ANNUAL THROUGHPUT TOTAL. LIKEWISE FIRST PART OF 2007 THROUGHPUT WAS ABOUT 45,587 GALLONS PER 6 HOURS. TO THAT END, BP DAYTON TERMINAL WAS REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM OF 79,260 GALLONS THROUGHPUT RATE PER 6 HOUR TEST PER OAC 3745-21-10(E) AND 40 CFR 60.503 OR BETTER. PER USEPA METHOD 21 NO LEAKS >10,000PPM AS METHANE WERE DETECTED. BACKPRESSURE APPEARED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF BEING MAINTAINED BETWEEN -6 AND +18 IN. WATER.

Page 489: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy) HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES. NOX = 2.18 LB/HR.

Page 490: epa.ohio.govepa.ohio.gov/portals/27/files/stack2007.xls · XLS file · Web view · 2015-10-13Resin tanker loading arm (3" OPW) 97.5% DE 98.0% DE P365 525 Gallon Weigh Tank P366

(Stars2 Migration Problems: Tested pollutants: NO2, NO; Permitted Allowable Emission Rate = 25 PPMVD NOX @ 15% O2; Permitted Maximum Operating Rate = 71.19 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT; Average Tested Emission Rate = 8.6 PPM NOX @ 15% 02; Average Tested Operating Rate = 71 MMBTU/HR HEAT INPUT;100% OF TURBINE CAPACITY; Results = Passed; AFS Date = 2009-01-05 00:00:00.0; AFS ID = legacy) HIGH CAPACITY DEMONSTRATION. NUMEROUS TEST DELAYS PUSHED THE DATE REPEATEDLY. THE UNIT WAS DELAYED FOR LACK OF DEMAND FOR NATURAL GAS BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS RELATING TO FRACTURES IN THE BODY OF THE HOUSING. UPON REPAIR - THE TEST WAS COMPLETED. THE TEST WAS COMPOSED OF 12 RUNS TOTAL = 3 TEST RUNS PER OPERATING CAPACITY. FOUR OPERATING CAPACITIES SPANNING 92%, 95%, 98%, AND 100% OF THE NORMAL OPERATING RANGE AS ALLOWED BY SUBPART GG. NOX AND CO WERE TESTED IN EACH RANGE AND THE VALUES ARE GIVEN IN SEPARATE APPENDIX K FILES. TESTS AT THE DIFFERENT CAPACITIES CONDUCTED ON SAME DATE BUT ENTERED AS SUCCESSIVE DATES FOR CETA ENTRY PURPOSES. NOX = 2.18 LB/HR.