environmental incentives tony vessa ce397 11-18-2003
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Environmental Incentives
Tony Vessa
CE397
11-18-2003
![Page 2: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
State of the Union
• Systems that do not support Designated Use– 40% Rivers– 45% Streams– 50% Lakes
• Point Source Costs (1997)– Private $14 Billion – Public $34 Billion
![Page 3: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Trading Objectives
• Pre-TMDL reduction incentives
• TMDL cost reductions
• Voluntary pollution reduction
• Allows potential for growth
• Long Term Environmental Benefit
• Multi-objective scenarios for mutual benefit
![Page 4: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Trading Criteria
• WQ Maintenance• Pre-TMDL Trading• TMDL Trading• No Tech. Based
Trading• Pre-Treatment• Intra-Plant
• EPA Oversight• CWA Enforcement
– NPDES
– Public Notice
– Standard Methods
– Designated Uses
– Anti-Backsliding
– Anti-Degridation
![Page 5: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Trading Protocol
• Legal Authority
• Units of Trade
• Definition of Credits– Duration– Trade Ratios
• Compliance and Enforcement
• Public Participation
• Program Evaluation
![Page 6: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Trade Example 1:1 Ratio
![Page 7: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Wayland Business Center
• Who: Office Complex on Sudbury River
• Trade: Point/Non-Point Phosphorus for Waste Water Treatment Plant
• Ratio 3:1
• How: Linked 24 faulty septic systems to complex WWTP
• Savings: $700K
![Page 8: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Environmental Taxes
• Recovering Cost Principle– Minimize Externalities of Environmental.
Degradation– Recover Cost for cleanup, monitoring,
enforcement, health care….
• Incentive Charge– Designed to influence production
![Page 9: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Environmental Taxes• Polluter Pay
– Recovering Cost Principle– Polluter pays per mass of pollutant– Maximize Pollution Reduction for Profit Margin
• Consumer Pay– Incentive Charge Principle– Consumer pays levy on Enviro harmful products– Minimize Production
![Page 10: Environmental Incentives Tony Vessa CE397 11-18-2003](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022072014/56649ead5503460f94bb437e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Discussion1. What are the benefits/drawbacks of water quality
trading? 2. Is water quality trading a viable tool for water quality
improvement? 3. Should pollution credits be considered a resource? 4. What are the benefits/drawbacks of the recovering cost
environmental tax? 5. What are the benefits/drawbacks of the incentive
charge environmental tax? 6. Should industrial environmental economics be driven
by incentives or by penalties?