entericbio realtime dx - serosep ltd. · the genus shigella consists of four species; s. sonnei (1...
TRANSCRIPT
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 1 of 22
. EBGPDX, EBSPSA-V2
240
EBRT 63 rev 03
Serosep Ltd., Annacotty Business Park, Annacotty, Limerick, Ireland. www.serosep.com
Technical support Email: [email protected] Tel: +353 61 358190
EntericBio realtime Dx User Manual
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 2 of 22
Intended Use
For in vitro diagnostic use. The EntericBio realtime® Dx assay is a molecular diagnostic test for the direct qualitative
detection of Salmonella enterica spp., Shigella spp., Campylobacter jejuni/coli/lari, Yersinia enterocolitica spp., Vibrio
cholerae/parahaemolyticus, Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli (STEC, also known as Verotoxin-producing E. coli,
VTEC) stx1/stx2 , Cryptosporidium parvum/ hominis, Giardia lamblia and Entamoeba histolytica in human stool
samples. The assay is intended for use with stool samples from symptomatic individuals to aid in the diagnosis of
bacterial gastroenteritis.
Summary and Explanation
Infectious gastroenteritis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The primary causes of bacterial
gastroenteritis include Salmonella enterica spp., Shigella spp., Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Campylobacter
jejuni.
The genus Salmonella comprises two species, namely S. enterica and S. bongori, with more than 2,500 serovars,
differentiated on the basis of their somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens by the White-Kauffmann-Le Minor Scheme1. Salmonella
isolates from humans are serotypes of Salmonella enterica. Gastroenteritis is the most common condition caused by Salmonella
species. Symptoms include abdominal pain, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, often accompanied by fever2.
The genus Shigella consists of four species; S. sonnei (1 serotype), S. flexneri (14 serotypes), S. boydi (18 serotypes) and S.
dysenteriae (13 serotypes), all of which are characterized serologically on the basis of the O antigen only, as Shigella spp. lack
the H antigen3. Infection with Shigella spp. manifests as a range of symptoms from watery diarrhoea to dysentery with frequent
small volume faeces containing blood, mucus and pus. The diarrhoea may be accompanied by fever and abdominal cramps4.
Strains of E. coli that produce the toxins Stx1 and Stx2 are termed Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli (STEC, also
known as Verotoxin-producing E. coli, VTEC)). The toxins are termed “shiga-like” due to their similarity to the toxin of
Shigella dysenteriae5. Infections vary in severity, from mild to bloody diarrhoea, and may occur in any age group, although it is
more common in children. STEC are capable of causing two types of disease, namely haemorrhagic colitis6 and haemolytic
uremic syndrome (HUS) 7. HUS is a life-threatening disease characterized by thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, and acute
renal dysfunction. Serogroup O157 is the most common cause of these illnesses, but at least 150 non-O157 STEC serotypes
have been reported as agents of both sporadic and outbreak-associated disease8-10.
There are 11 species in the genus Yersinia, however only three of them are regarded as human pathogens: Y. pestis, Y.
enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis. Yersinia enterocolitica survives at low temperatures and can grow well at refrigeration
temperatures which contributes to its potential as foodborne pathogen11. Pigs are recognized as a source of Y. enterocolitica
strains and contaminated or undercooked pork is considered the main vector for infection with Y. enterocolitica12, 13. However,
this species has also been detected in other animal products11.
Yersinia enterocolitica species are divided into 6 biotypes (1A, 1B, 2-5), depending on their genomic characteristics. Main
symptoms of yersiniosis include abdominal pain with fever and diarrhoea and often mimic other diseases such as appendicitis
or Crohn’s disease11, therefore accurate and fast detection of Y. enterocolitica infection is important for patient
management decisions and avoidance of unnecessary surgical procedures.
Members of the genus Vibrio are Gram-negative, straight or curved, motile rods.
Several Vibrio spp. are considered human pathogens and have been implicated in gastroenteritis. This includes
species such as V. cholerae (toxigenic and non-toxigenic serogroups), V. parahaemolyticus14. Most cases of Vibrio-
caused gastroenteritis can be linked to consumption of raw or undercooked seafood15.
The genus Campylobacter contains 25 species, however, Campylobacter jejuni accounts for about 90% of reported
infections and most of the remainder are caused by Campylobacter coli and lari16, 17. In human hosts diarrhoea is
usually brief and sequelae are uncommon. Initial symptoms may be severe with fever and abdominal pain suggesting
appendicitis. Rarely, Campylobacter species infection may become invasive, with consequences ranging from
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 3 of 22
transient, self-limiting bacteraemia, to fulminant Gram negative sepsis. Occasionally infection may produce sequelae
such as reactive arthritis, bursitis, endocarditis and neonatal sepsis. Acute post-infective demyelination may develop,
affecting the peripheral nervous system (Guillain-Barré Syndrome), and/or the central nervous system and cranial
nerves (e.g. the Miller-Fisher Syndrome)18.
Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia enterocolitica and Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli are members of the family
Enterobacteriaceae. These organsims are Gram negative, oxidase negative and grow well aerobically at 37⁰C.
Campylobacters are curved, S-shaped or spiral Gram negative rods. They are motile, microaerophilic (optimum 5-10%
oxygen) and oxidase positive. Campylobacter species do not ferment or oxidize carbohydrates. A well-recognized
problem associated with identification of Campylobacter species is the unreliability of biochemical tests for this
purpose19. Several studies have shown that molecular-based detection methods result in increased detection of
Campylobacter spp. when compared to culture17, 20.
Traditional laboratory methods used to detect and identify these pathogen groups combine selective culture broths
and/or selective culture plates with a range of biochemical tests and serology. This approach is relatively labour
intensive with a typical time to result of between 48 and 96 hours. In addition, routine laboratory detection of STEC is
generally limited to non-sorbitol fermenting E.coli belonging to the O157 serogroup20,21.
Cryptosporidium and Giardia are the two leading causes of parasite-associated diarrheal disease22. Symptoms can
include diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, fever, nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite in addition to greasy stools and
flatulence in cases of giardiasis.
Cryptosporidium is a genus of apicomplexan protozoans that contains at least seven species associated with
human diseases, with the most frequently isolated species being C. hominis and C. parvum. C. hominis is mainly
found in humans while C. parvum can also be isolated from cattle and other ruminants22.
Giardia is a genus of anaerobic flagellated protozoan parasites with a life cycle that alternates between an
actively swimming trophozoite and an infective, resistant cyst. The organism colonizes and reproduces in the small
intestines of several vertebrates, causing giardiasis, with G. lamblia assemblages A and B most frequently reported in
humans23.
Entamoeba is a genus of single-cell protozoan parasites within which at least six species can be found in
humans among which Entamoeba histolytica is the only pathogenic species24. The symptoms of amoebiasis include
diarrhoea (mild to severe), often with mucus and blood and may occur several months after the initial infection with E.
histolytica24. Furthermore, the infection may become chronic and spread extra-intestinally, mostly to the liver or to the
brain, where it is associated with higher mortality rates24. Microscopic examination of stools does not allow
differentiation between E. histolytica and non-pathogenic E. dispar species as these two are morphologically
indistinguishable25. Therefore, molecular-based detection methods offer increased specificity for the detection of E.
histolytica in patients in a diagnostic setting.
Traditional laboratory methods using light microscopy to identify these parasites tend to be labour intensive and
subjective26 and molecular methods have been shown to improve detection of those parasites in patients27-30.
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 4 of 22
Test Principle
The EntericBio realtime® Dx assay is a molecular diagnostic test for the simultaneous detection of Salmonella enterica
spp., Shigella spp., Campylobacter jejuni/coli/lari, Yersinia enterocolitica, Vibrio cholerae/ parahaemolyticus, Shiga-like
toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) stx1/stx2, Cryptosporidium parvum/ hominis, Giardia lamblia and Entamoeba
histolytica from human stool samples. The assay works directly from the stool sample and does not require nucleic
acid extraction/purification. The entire mastermix required to perform each test is lyophilised into individual reaction
wells. Each reaction well contains an Internal Amplification Control (IAC) to monitor for PCR inhibition. A positive
amplification control is also provided with each kit.
Briefly, a swab is coated with the stool sample, the swab is re-suspended in a tube of EntericBio Stool Preparation
Solution (SPS) and then placed on the EntericBio heatstation and heated at 103°C for 30 min. The heat-treated
samples are placed on the EntericBio workstation for fully automated transfer of the processed samples directly to the
lyophilised reaction wells using the EntericBio Dx programme. The wells are capped and transferred to the real-time
PCR instrument for automated amplification, detection and analysis with the EntericBio Dx programme. An analytical
run of 32 samples has a turnaround time to result of less than 3 hours with typically 30 minutes hands-on time.
Reagents Provided
EntericBio realtime® Dx (EBGPDX) 240 tests
o PCR strips (4 tests/strip) (10 pouches/24 tests)
o Reconstitution solution (500ul/green cap)
o Positive control (red cap)
o Re-suspension Buffer (50ml/green cap)
EntericBio realtime® SPS Kit (EBSPSA-V2) 240 tubes
o Stool Preparation Solution (240 x 4 ml/white pierceable cap)
Storage
The EntericBio realtime® Dx assay PCR kit should be stored 2-8oC and EntericBio realtime® SPS kit should be stored
at 2-25oC on receipt in the laboratory. Opened pouches should be used within 7 days.
Additional Equipment and Material Requirements
o Roche LightCycler 480 II (real-time PCR instrument option 1) (Product code: 05015278001)
o ABI 7500 FAST Cycler (real-time PCR instrument option 2) (Product code: 4357362)
o EntericBio workstation (Product code: 5070000450)
o Eppendorf 5070 50µl filter tips (Product code: 0030014430)
o Eppendorf 5430 Plate centrifuge (Product code: 5427000666)
o Eppendorf MixMate (Product code: 5353000030)
o EntericBio heatstation with block inserts for EntericBio racks (Product code: EBQBD4 SEROSEP)
o Bioplastics LC480 plate adaptor (Product code: B79482-2)
o EntericBio FLOQSwabs (Product code: 2E014N10.SER)
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 5 of 22
Warnings and Precautions
o The EntericBio Dx assay is for in vitro diagnostic use only.
o The EntericBio Dx assay should only be performed by suitably trained laboratory personnel.
o All clinical specimens and disposables/reagents in contact with clinical specimens should be treated as
potentially infectious and should be handled according to the relevant local/national safety guidelines and
regulations.
o Good laboratory practice for working with nucleic acid amplification technologies should be followed at all
times.
o Strictly follow the test kit instructions and do not use the kit after the expiration date.
o The EntericBio PCR strips contain lyophilised PCR reagents in the form of a pellet inside each well. Ensure
that the lyophilised pellets are at the bottom of each well prior to use. If necessary, gently tap the PCR strips
until the pellets are on the bottom of the wells.
o Securely re-seal the PCR pouches promptly after use (with the desiccant inside) and remove any excess air
prior to sealing.
o The PCR strips and caps may be cut. It is extremely important to cut the strips/cap cleanly along the guide line
indent on the cap. It is important not to compromise the integrity of the cap or the well.
o Optical caps should always be handled with powder-free gloves.
o Following amplification, the optical caps should never be removed from the PCR strips. Used PCR strips
should be disposed of in accordance with good laboratory practice for working with nucleic acid amplification
technologies.
Specimen Transport and Storage
Specimens should be transported to the lab as promptly as possible after collection. Samples not tested within 24
hours of receipt in the laboratory should be stored at 2-8oC and tested within 5 days. Where culture/microscopic
confirmation of PCR positive samples is required, laboratories should refer to local/national criteria for acceptance of
samples.
Test Procedure
Positive Control Preparation
o Re-suspend the positive control vial (red Cap) with 200µl of reconstitution solution (500ul, green cap).
o Add the entire 200µl of the re-suspended positive control to a clearly labelled SPS tube. Mix well and store at
2-8⁰C.
o Prepare a fresh positive control for each new test kit (or after 10 weeks, whichever is sooner) and discard
when the test kit has been fully used.
Sample Preparation
o Label the required number of SPS tubes.
o Lightly coat the entire EntericBio FLOQswab with the stool sample then re-suspend the swab in the
EntericBio SPS solution.
o Securely cap the SPS tube and place in the EntericBio SPS racks A and B in the numerical order indicated on
the racks starting from numbered position 1 on rack A and ending in numbered position 30 on rack B (Figure
1).
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 6 of 22
o Close the lid(s) of the EntericBio SPS rack(s).
o Place the EntericBio SPS rack(s) with SPS tubes into its corresponding heat block adaptor on the EntericBio
heatstation set at 103°C for 30 min.
PCR Set Up
o Put on gloves. Fill an empty SPS tube with a minimum of 4 ml of the Re-suspension Buffer and place in
position 2 of EntericBio base in location A1 on the EntericBio workstation (Figure 1). This tube is also used as
the negative control.
o Insert the re-suspended Positive Control SPS tube in position 1 of the EntericBio base in location A1 on the
EntericBio workstation (Figure 1).
o Place the EntericBio SPS Rack A in location A1 and rack B in location B1 on the EntericBio workstation
(Figure 1). Change gloves.
Figure 1. EntericBio workstation layout and PCR strip orientation.
o Select the required number of EntericBio Dx PCR strips (including controls). One strip is sufficient for 4 tests.
Re-seal the pouches correctly promptly after use.
o Load the strips onto the thermorack one after another, without any gaps. Align the strips with the L and R
symbols orientated to the left and right hand side of the thermorack/instrument respectively. Ensure that the
arrows on both sides of the strip point upwards (Figure 2).
Figure 2 Orientation and Alignment of the EntericBio realtime Dx PCR strip on the thermorack.
o De-cap the strips carefully and label them in numerical order immediately before starting the run (Figure 1).
o Turn on the EntericBio workstation and select the EntericBio realtime Dx protocol.
o Enter the required number of tests to be processed as per on screen instructions
Orientation Orientation
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Left Align Right
Align
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 7 of 22
o Ensure the stage is loaded with EntericBio SPS rack A in location A1, EntericBio SPS rack B in location B1,
pipette filter tips in location A2 and PCR strips in location B2 (Figure 1). Ensure a clean discard waste bag is in
place on the discard bucket.
o When the stage is loaded start the run as per the on-screen instructions.
o When the run is finished, immediately remove the thermorack and strips from the platform. Securely fasten
the optical caps onto the PCR strips.
o Place the strips securely (do not over tighten) onto the Eppendorf MixMate and mix for 60 sec at 2,000 rpm.
o Place the strips into the centrifuge and centrifuge for 60 sec at 1,500 rpm.
o Option 1 for LC480: Place strips into the LC480 adaptor in the numerical order labelled on the strips. Start
loading in position A1 of the adaptor, then fill the adaptor from top to bottom and left to right with L and R
symbols aligned to the left and right hand side of the adaptor respectively. Place the loaded adaptor onto the
LC480 instrument.
o Option 2 for ABI 7500 FAST: Place strips into the ABI 7500 FAST in the numerical order labelled on the
strips. Start loading in position A1 of the plate drawer, then fill the drawer from top to bottom and left to right
with L and R symbols aligned to the left and right hand side of the plate drawer respectively.
o When the run is complete, remove used PCR strips from the instrument. Do not remove the optical caps
from the PCR strips following the amplification. Place in a sealable plastic bag, seal and dispose in
accordance with local / national guidelines.
Amplification and Detection with Roche LightCycler 480 II instrument (option 1):
Amplification and Detection
o Select New Experiment from Macro in the LC480 front screen. In the pop up
screen select EntericBio realtime Dx. Save the experiment in the required folder and the run will then start
automatically.
o Select the Sample Editor tab in the module bar.
o Select the Salmonella Subset from the Select Samples menu
o Enter the sample numbers in order starting at position A3 (Positive control= A1,Negative control=A2)
o When the experiment is finished a pop up for the traceable database appears. Type ‘ok’ to approve the run
and select ok to create the analysis.
o The Analysis screen will open automatically. Select each target to be analysed from the Open Existing
Analysis drop menu
o Select the Analysis Options tab to toggle between target analysis.
o From the module bar select the Report tab and select Generate to create the report, then
save the report or Print the report as required.
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 8 of 22
o If interfaced, select the navigator screen and select the run file to be exported. Click the Export tab
and change the file type to .xml.
o Select the appropriate location on the drive to export the run file and save it.
Results Analysis
Positive
A sample is assigned as positive for the target where the sample produces a typical amplification curve for the
designated well.
Negative
A sample is assigned as negative for the target where there is no evidence of amplification.
A sample must not be considered negative unless it is positive for the internal amplification control in the
corresponding well.
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 9 of 22
Uncertain
Occasionally, the amplification curve may be highlighted by the LC480 software as uncertain and the sample well is
blue.
Internal Amplification Control
A true negative sample must have a positive result for the internal amplification control. Negative samples that have a
failed internal control result should be retested from the original sample. If the sample is positive for any of the target
organisms in the corresponding well, the internal control result is dispensable due to competition in the reaction.
Positive Control
The respective positive control wells must be positive for each target in order to validate the results of the experimental
run.
Negative Control
The negative control wells must be negative for each target in order to validate the results of the experimental run.
Amplification and Detection with ABI 7500 FAST instrument (option 2):
ABI 7500 Software:
o Select Template in the ABI 7500 software home screen. In the pop up screen select EntericBio
realtime Dx. Save the experiment in the required folder and start the run.
o Select the Plate Setup tab in the Setup menu.
o Enter the sample numbers in correct order in the Define Samples tab starting from Sample 3 position (Positive
control= Sample 1, Negative control=Sample 2)
o When the run is finished, the analysis is performed by selecting the Analysis tab from the
Experiment Menu. In the Plot Settings select Linear from the drop down menu in the Graph Type section.
o Change the View Plate Layout to View Well Table.
o Group by targets by selecting Target from the Group By drop down menu.
o Individual targets are analysed by selecting the target from the Target drop down menu in the Options tab.
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 10 of 22
ABI 7500 Fast System SDS Software:
o Select New from the File menu. Click Browse and select EntericBio realtime Dx template from the appropriate
location. Click Finish to apply the template.
o Save the experiment in the required folder and start the run by clicking into the Instrument tab and selecting
the Start button.
1. To enter Sample ID, select the SETUP tab. Highlight the wells A7, A8, A9 (Sample 1 and scan the first Sample
ID barcode from the Sample Worklist. Continue scanning samples in the order they are listed in the EntericBio
Sample Worklist.
If it is not possible to scan the barcode, Sample ID can be manually entered and sign on the keyboard can be used to proceed to the next sample
o Positive Control are pre-assigned to position A1, A2 and A3, Negative Control in position A4, A5 and A6
respectively.
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 11 of 22
o When the run is finished, the analysis is performed by selecting the Amplification plot tab from the Results tab.
Graph settings can be changed by right-clicking on the graph and selecting Linear/ Log option from the Post-
run setting section.
o Individual targets are analysed by selecting the target from the Detector drop down menu.
o Ct values for the targets can be analysed by selecting the Report tab within the Results tab and grouping the
results by Detector or Sample name.
Results Analysis
Positive
A sample is assigned as positive for the target where the sample produces a typical amplification curve for the
designated well
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 12 of 22
Negative
A sample is assigned as negative for the target where there is no evidence of amplification.
A sample must not be considered negative unless it is positive for the internal amplification control in the
corresponding well
Internal Amplification Control
A true negative sample must have a positive result for the internal amplification control. Negative samples that have a
failed internal control result must be retested from the original sample. If the sample is positive for any of the target
organisms in the corresponding well, the internal control result is dispensable due to competition in the reaction.
Positive Control
The respective positive control wells must be positive for each target in order to validate the results of the experimental
run.
Negative Control
The negative control wells must be negative for each target in order to validate the results of the experimental run.
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 13 of 22
Results Interpretation
Salmonella
A positive result for Salmonella indicates the presence of the gene target specific for Salmonella enterica spp. in the
sample.
Shigella
A positive result for Shigella indicates the presence of the nucleic acid target for the Invasion Plasmid Antigen H (ipaH)
gene. This virulence factor can be carried by Shigella spp. and Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC).
Campylobacter
A positive result for Campylobacter indicates the presence of the gene target specific for Campylobacter jejuni,
Campylobacter coli or Campylobacter lari in the sample (not differentiated)
STEC/ VTEC
A positive result for STEC/ VTEC indicates the presence of the stx1 and/ or stx2 gene target in the sample (not
differentiated).
Yersinia
A positive result for Yersinia indicates the presence of the gene target specific for Yersinia enterocolitica in the sample.
Vibrio
A positive result for Vibrio indicates the presence of the gene target specific for Vibrio cholerae or Vibrio
parahaemolyticus in the sample.
Cryptosporidium
A positive result for Cryptosporidium indicates the presence of the gene target specific for C. parvum and/ or C.
hominis in the sample.
Giardia
A positive result for Giardia indicates the presence of the gene target specific for G. lamblia in the sample.
Entamoeba
A positive result for Entamoeba indicates the presence of the gene target specific for Entamoeba histolytica in the
sample.
A positive result with Cp >35 may indicate a low level of target DNA in the sample, close to the limit of detection of the assay.
These results may not be reproducible and should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological information
Uncertain
An uncertain result indicates that the test is ‘indeterminate’ for the presence of the nucleic acid target in the
corresponding sample. The sample can be repeated from original faeces or tested with an alternative method.
Laboratories should consider local/ national guidelines when reporting positive and negative results.
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 14 of 22
Analytical Performance Characteristics
Analytical Specificity (Inclusivity)
NCTC National collection of type cultures. NSRL National Salmonella Reference Laboratory (University College Hospital Galway,
Ireland).
SARB Salmonella reference collection B (University College Cork, Ireland). CHO National E.coli Reference Laboratory (Cherry Orchard, Dublin, Ireland)
ATCC American type culture collection. ULjub University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
DSMZ Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen BEI BEI Resources
IHB Imelda Hospital Belgium
Strain Source Strain Source Strain Source Strain Source
C. coli DSMZ 4689 S. anatum SARB 2 S. flexneri NCTC 9950 Y. enterocolitica 4;3 Clinical, IHB
C. coli NCTC 12143 S.braenderup NCTC 05750 S. sonnei NCTC 7924 Y. enterocolitica 9;2 Clinical, IHB
C. jejuni NCTC 43442 S. bredeney NCTC 05731 S. sonnei NCTC 8220 Y. enterocolitica 36;1A Clinical, IHB
C. jejuni NCTC 12106 S.derby SARB 11 S. sonnei NCTC 8574 Y. enterocolitica 3;4 Clinical, IHB
C. jejuni NCTC 12109 S. dublin NCTC 09676 S. sonnei NCTC 9773 Y. enterocolitica 6;1A Clinical, IHB
C. jejuni NCTC 11828 S. enteritidis ATCC 13076 S. dysenteriae NCTC 5109 Y. enterocolitica 63;1A Clinical, IHB
C. jejuni subsp. doylei NCTC 11951 S. enteritidis PT4 NCTC 13349 S. dysenteriae NCTC 6340 E.coli O111 (VT1+VT2) Clinical (CHO)
C. lari NCTC 12144 S. gallinarum NCTC 423,287/91 S. dysenteriae NCTC 8571 E.coli O111 (VT1) Clinical (CHO)
C. lari NCTC 11458 S. gallinarum NCTC 13346 S. dysenteriae NCTC 4837 E.coli O182 (VT1) Clinical (CHO)
S. gaminara NCTC 5797 S. goldcoast NSRLd S. dysenteriae NCTC 8217 E.coli O26 (VT1) Clinical (CHO)
S. Virchow NCTC 05742 S. hadar ULjub MI 2 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-204 E.coli O76 (VT1) Clinical (CHO)
S. manhattan NCTC 06245 S. heidelberg NCTC 5717 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-209 E.coli O103 (VT1) Clinical (CHO)
S. newport SARB 36 S. infantis Uljub VF 35/94 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-212 E.coli O26 (VT1+VT2) Clinical (CHO)
S. nottingham NCTC 07832 S. kentucky NCTC 05799 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-205 E.coli O26 (VT1+VT2) Clinical (CHO)
S. panama SARB 40 S. livingstone NCTC 09125 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-210 E.coli O157 (VT1+VT2) Clinical (CHO)
S. saint-Paul Uljub VF S-
13/95 S. london NCTC 05777 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-213 E. coli O157 (VT2) Clinical (CHO)
S. senftenberg SARB 59 S. boydii NCTC 8576 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-206 E. coli O157 (VT2) Clinical (CHO)
S. Stanley SARB 60 S. boydii NCTC 9328 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-204 E. coli O157 (VT2) Clinical (CHO)
S. typhimurium ATCC 14028 S. boydii NCTC 9357 V. parahaemolyticus DSM 10027 E. coli O157 (VT2) Clinical (CHO)
S. typhimurium LT 2 NCTC 12416 S. boydii NCTC 9850 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-207 E. coli O157 (VT2) Clinical (CHO)
S. typhimurium DT 104 NCTC 13348 S. flexneri NCTC 4 Y. enterocolitica BEI NR-2011 E. coli O157 (VT2) Clinical (CHO)
S. uganda NCTC 06015 S. flexneri NCTC 7885 V. cholerae Vircell MBC118 Cryptosporidium parvum ATCC PRA-67D
S.agona NCTC 11377 S. flexneri NCTC 8523 Y. enterocolitica 7,8;1A Clinical, IHB Giardia intestinalis WB ATCC 30957D
Giardia intestinalis
Portland-1 ATCC 30888D
Entamoeba histolytica
Rahman BEI NR-179
Entamoeba histolytica
HM-1:IMSS ATCC 30459D
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 15 of 22
Analytical Specificity (Exclusivity)
Strain Source Strain Source Strain Source Strain Source
Aeromonas hydrophila DSM 17695 Entamoeba histolytica# ATCC 30459D
Pseudomonas
putida DSMZ 291
V. furnissii*B DSM 19622
Alcaligenes faecalis DSM 30030
Enterobacter
aerogenes DSM 30053 Rahnella aquatilis DSM 4594
V. harveiB DSM 19623
Arcobacter butzleri DSM 8739 Enterobacter cloacae DSM 30054
Saccharomyces
cerevisiae DSM 1848
V. mimicus*B DSM 19130
Bacillus cereus DSM 31 Enterococcus faecalis DSM 20478
Salmonella
enteritidis# DSM 17420
V. natrigiens*B DSM 759
Bacillus subtilis DSM 10 Enterococcus faecium DSM 20477
Salmonella
typhimurium# DSM 554
V. pelagiusB DSM 21205
Bacteroides fragilis DSM 2151 Escherichia coli DSM 30083 Serratia liquifaciens DSM 4487 V. proteolyticus*B DSM 30189
Campylobacter coli# DSM 4689 E. coli EPEC DSM 8695
Serratia
marcescens DSM 1608
Yersinia aldovaeB DSM 18303
Campylobacter jejuni# DSM 4688 E. coli ETEC DSM 1103 Serratia odoriferae DSM 4582 Yersinia aleksicaeB DSM 114987
Campylobacter lari# DSM 11375 E. coli STEC# Vircell MBC022 Serratia rubidaea DSM 4480 Yersinia bercovieriB DSM 118528
Candida albicans DSM 1577 Escherichia hermannii DSM 4560 Shigella boydii# DSM 7532 Yersinia entomophagaB DSM 122339
Citrobacter amalonaticus DSM 4593T Ewingella americana DSM 4580 Shigella flexneri# DSM 7532 Yersinia frederinskseniiB DSM 118490
Citrobacter freundi DSM 30039 Giardia intestinalis# ATCC 30888D Shigella sonnei# DSM 5570 Yersinia intermediaB DSM 118517
Citrobacter koseri DSM 4595 Hafnia alvei DSM 30163
Staphylococcus
aureus DSM 20231
Yersinia kristenseniiB DSM 118543
Clostridium difficile DSM 1296 Klebsiella oxytoca DSM 5175
Staphylococcus
epidermidis DSM 20044
Yersinia massiliensisB DSM 121859
Clostridium perfringens DSM 756 Klebsiella pneumoniae DSM 30104
Stenotrophomonas
maltophilia DSM 50170
Yersinia mollarettiB DSM 118520
Clostridium sordelli DSM 2141
Listeria
monocytogenes DSM 20600
Streptococcus
agalactiae DSM 2134
Yersinia nurmiiB DSM 122296
Cronobacter sakazaki DSM 4485 Morganella morganii DSM 30164 Streptococcus bovis DSM 20480 Yersinia pekkaneniiB DSM 122769
Cryptosporidium parvum#
ATCC PRA-
67D Neisseria gonorrhoea DSM 9188
Streptococcus
equinus DSM 20558
Yersinia
pseudotuberculosisB
DSM 18992
Edwardsiella tarda DSM 30052
Plesiomonas
shigelloides DSM 8224
V. alginolyticus*B DSM 2171 Yersinia rhodeiB DSM 118270
Encephaitozoon hellum BEI NR 9701 Proteus mirabilis DSM 4479 V. campbelliiB DSM 19270 Yersinia ruckeriB DSM 118506
Encephalitozoon cuniculi BEI NR 9703 Proteus vulgaris DSM 13387 V. diazotrophicus*B DSM 2604 Yersinia similisB DSM 118211
Encephalitozoon
intestinalis BEI NR9702 Providencia stuartii DSM 4539
V. fischeriB DSM 507
Entamoeba dispar
Clinical
sample VS
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa DSM 50071
V. fluvialis*B DSM 19283
*See limitations of method # These were included in the exclusivity panel to confirm no cross-reaction occurs with other targets detected by the assay. B Tested only for specificity of the relevant targets
ATCC American type culture collection.
DSMZ Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen
BEI BEI Resources Repository
VS St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney
Analytical Specificity (Interfering substances)
A range of exogenous and endogenous substances were tested for potential PCR interference. No interference was
seen due to the presence of any of the substances tested.
Substance Result Substance Result
Amoxicillin NI Human DNA NI
Antacid NI Hydrocortisone NI
Anti-diarrhoeal NI Metronidazole NI
Cholesterol NI Mucin NI
Ciprofloxican NI Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory (NSAID) NI
Erythromycin NI Trimethoprim NI
Haemorrhoidal cream NI Whole human blood NI
NI No interference
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 16 of 22
External Quality Assessment
Distributions from two Independent Quality Assessment (EQA) Schemes – Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics
(QCMD) and United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UK NEQAS) were tested with the
EntericBio realtime® Dx assay.
QCMD distribution panels
QCMD Bacterial (2012-2016) and Parasitic (2014-2016) EQA distribution panels were tested and EntericBio realtime
Dx assay results were 98% concordant with expected results, with one observed discordant result (B16-04).
QCMD Bacterial Panel
QCMD Parasitic Panel
QCMD Reference
Sample EntericBio Result
QCMD Reference
Sample EntericBio Result
QCMD Reference
Sample EntericBio Result
B12-01 S. enteritidis Positive B12-02 C. lari Positive B12-03 C. jejuni Positive
B12-04 Y. enterocolitica Positive B12-05 S. enteritidis Positive B12-06 Negative Negative
B12-07 C. jejuni Positive B12-08 C. ureolyticus Negative B12-09 C. jejuni Positive
B12-10 S. flexneri Positive B12-11 C. lari Positive B12-12 S. enteritidis Positive
B12-13 C. jejuni Positive B12-14 S. flexneri Positive B12-15 Negative Negative
B12-16 C. ureolyticus Negative B12-17 C. jejuni Positive B12-18 S. enteritidis Positive
B12-19 C. jejuni Positive B12-20 Y. enterocolitica Positive B13-01 S. enteritidis Positive
B13-02 C. lari Positive B13-03 Y. enterocolitica Positive B13-04 C. jejuni Positive
B13-05 Negative Negative B13-06 S. enteritidis Positive B13-07 C. jejuni Positive
B13-08 S. flexneri Positive B13-09 C. jejuni Positive B13-10 C. ureolyticus Negative
B14-01 S. flexneri Positive B14-02 C. jejuni Positive B14-03 C. lari Positive
B14-04 C. jejuni Positive B14-05 Negative Negative B14-06 C. jejuni Positive
B14-07 Y. enterocolitica Positive B14-08 S. enteritidis Positive B14-09 C. coli Positive
B14-10 P. shigelloides Negative B15-01 P. shigelloides Negative B15-02 C. coli Positive
B15-03 S. enteritidis Positive B15-04 C. lari Positive B15-05 C. jejuni Positive
B15-06 Y. enterocolitica Positive B15-07 S. flexneri Positive B15-08 C. jejuni Positive
B15-09 Negative Negative B16-01 C. coli Positive B16-02 C. coli Positive
B16-03 C. lari Positive B16-04 C. coli/ P. shigelloides Negative B16-05 C. jejuni Positive
B16-06 S. enteritidis Positive B16-07 Negative Negative B16-08 S. flexneri Positive
B16-09 Y. enterocolitica Positive
P14-01 E. histolytica Positive P14-02 G. lamblia Positive P14-03 G. lamblia Positive
P14-04 E. dispar Negative P14-05 Negative Negative P14-06 C. parvum/hominis Positive
P14-07 E. histolytica Positive P14-08 C. parvum/hominis Positive P15-01 G. lamblia Positive
P15-02 C.parvum/hominis Positive P15-03 E. histolytica Positive P15-04 C. parvum/hominis Positive
P15-05 Negative Negative P15-06 G. lamblia Positive P15-07 G. lamblia Positive
P15-08 E. histolytica Positive P16-01 G. lamblia Positive P16-02 C. parvum Positive
P16-03 G. lamblia Positive P16-04 E. dispar/ B. hominis Negative P16-05 E. histolytica Positive
P16-06 C. parvum Positive P16-07 Negative Negative P16-08 E. histolytica Positive
P16-09 D. fragilis/ B. hominis Negative
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 17 of 22
UK NEQAS distribution panels 2013-2017
UK NEQAS Faecal Pathogens and General Bacteriology EQA distribution panels (2013-2017) were tested and
EntericBio realtime® Dx results were 100% concordant with expected results.
Specimen Number
Sample EntericBio Result
Specimen Number
Sample EntericBio Result
Specimen Number
Sample EntericBio Result
1542 S. Enteritidis Positive 1543 S. Kentucky Positive 1709 Commensal flora Negative
1710 S. Typhimurium Positive 1840 Y. pseudotuberculosis Negative 1852 C. jejuni Positive
1853 S. Agona Positive 1885 S. Kentucky Positive 1968 S. Braenderup Positive
2012 S. flexneri Positive 2049 C. jejuni Positive 2086 S. Typhimurium Positive
2094 S. Braenderup Positive 2095 Commensal flora Negative 2096 C. jejuni Positive
2097 S. Typhimurium Positive 2174 V. parahaemolyticus Positive 2212 C. jejuni/coli Positive
2252 P. shigelloides Negative 2295 S. sonnei Positive 2340 S. Enteritidis Positive
2390 K. pneumoniae Negative 2391 N. meningitidis Negative 2392 Commensal flora Negative
2430 A. hydrophila Negative 2431 B. parapertussis Negative 2432 Y. enterocolitica Positive
2548 Commensal flora Negative 2549 L. monocytogenes Negative 2550 S. Oranienburg Positive
2597 S. aureus Negative 2598 B. fragilis Negative 2599 C. coli Positive
2628 β-haem Strep Negative 2629 N. gonhorrhoeae Negative 2630 S. Typhimurium Positive
2666 E. coli Negative 2667 C. ulcerans Negative 2668 S. sonnei Positive
2673 S. Oranienburg Positive 2674 C. coli Positive 2675 S. Typhimurium Positive
2676 S. sonnei Positive 2710 A. aphrophilus Negative 2711 L. pneumophila Negative
2712 Commensal flora Negative 2753 Commensal flora Negative 2754 P. mirabilis Negative
2755 V. cholerae Positive 2789 S. pneumoniae Negative 2790 C. septicum Negative
2791 Commensal flora Negative 2829 B. parapertussis Negative 2830 β-haem Strep. Negative
2831 S. boydii Positive 2870 C. macginleyi Negative 2871 S. milleri group Negative
2872 C. jejuni Positive 2920 S. aureus Negative 2921 A. fumigatus sp. Negative
2922 S. Enteritidis Positive 2969 S. gallolyticus Negative 2970 H. influenzae Negative
2971 Y. pseudotuberculosis
Negative 3010 N. meningitidis Negative 3011 B. cepacia complex Negative
3012 C. difficile Negative 3128 S. aureus/ β-haem Strep
Negative 3129 B. pertussis Negative
3130 S. sonnei Positive 3173 A. haemolyticum Negative 3174 P. putida Negative
3175 S. Enteritidis Positive 3209 M. catarrhalis Negative 3210 C. jejuni Positive
3250 E. gallinarum Negative 3251 S. maltophilia Negative 3252 S. Montevideo Positive
3257 V. parahaemolyticus Positive 3258 S. Montevideo Positive 3259 C. jejuni Positive
3260 S. Enteritidis Positive 3294 S. pneumoniae Negative 3295 N. cyriacigeorgica Negative
3296 S. flexneri Positive 3338 S. marcescens Negative 3339 C. perfringens Negative
3340 V. parahaemolyticus Positive 3378 P. anaerobius Negative 3379 N. gonorrhoeae Negative
3380 Commensal flora Negative 3415 P. stutzeri Negative 3416 E. rhusiopathiae Negative
3417 Non-toxigenic C. difficile
Negative 3456 A. niger species complex
Negative 3457 β-haem Strep. Negative
3458 C. jejuni Positive 3510 S. mutans Negative 3511 B. fragilis Negative
3512 S. Stanley Positive 3556 V. alginolyticus Negative 3557 C. albicans Negative
3558 Y. enterocolitica Positive 3598 C. noyvi Negative 3599 N. meningitidis Negative
3600 V. cholerae non-O1 Positive 3735 P. mirabilis Negative 3736 S. aureus Negative
3737 S. Typhimurium Positive 3780 S. lugdenensis Negative 3781 N. cyriacigeorgica Negative
3782 S. sonnei Positive
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 18 of 22
Analytical sensitivity
Analytical sensitivity was determined by testing a standard dilution series for each target. Each dilution series
consisted of 8 replicates of 6 serial dilutions. Statistical results were generated using Minitab. The limit of detection of
the assay was established as <15 cell equivalents for Salmonella, Shigella, STEC, Yersinia, Vibrio and Campylobacter
and <15 genome copies for Entamoeba histolytica, Cryptosporidium and Giardia lamblia with a probability of greater
than or equal to 95% by Probit analysis.
Clinical Performance Characteristics
A total of 245 clinical samples were tested by a participating clinical laboratory. Reference method included a
combination of alternative CE-IVD molecular assay (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Shiga-like toxin-producing
E. coli, Cryptosporidium, Giardia), culture (Yersinia, Vibrio) and microscopy (Entamoeba).
EntericBio
Pos Neg
Reference
Method
Pos 103 0
Neg 2 149
Sensitivity 1.00 (0.96 – 1.00 95% CI)
Specificity 0.99 (0.95 – 0.99 95% CI)
PPV 0.98 (0.93 – 0.99 95% CI)
NPV 1.00 (0.97 – 1.00 95% CI)
EntericBio Dx Routine Method
Salmonella 9 (9) 9
Shigella 14 (14) 14
Campylobacter 17 (17) 17
STEC 12 (12) 12
Yersinia 20 (20) 20
Vibrio 2 (2) 2
Entamoeba 3 (1)a 1
Giardia 15 (15) 15
Cryptosporidium 13 (13) 13
a) 2 additional E. histolytica were confirmed by sequencing
Numbers in parentheses denote samples in agreement between the two methods.
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 19 of 22
Limitations of Method
o Results from the EntericBio realtime® Dx assay should be interpreted in conjunction with patient’s clinical signs and
symptoms, medical history and other laboratory data available to the physician.
o The test is qualitative and does not provide a quantitative measurement of the detected organism nor indicate the
amount of the pathogen present in the sample.
o A positive PCR result does not indicate the presence of a viable organism in the sample at the time of testing.
o The EntericBio realtime® Dx assay is not recommended for samples submitted for test of clearance/cure – these
samples should be tested by routine culture methods.
o EntericBio realtime® Dx assay does not differentiate which Campylobacter species (coli or lari or jejuni) is present in the
sample.
o EntericBio realtime® Dx assay does not differentiate which Vibrio species (cholerae or parahaemolyticus) is present in
the sample23-25.
o EntericBio realtime® Dx assay does not differentiate which stx gene (stx1 or stx2) is present in the sample.
o EntericBio realtime® Dx assay does not differentiate which Cryptosporidium species (parvum or hominis) is present in
the sample.
o The detection of the target is dependent upon appropriate specimen collection, transport, storage, handling and
preparation. Inappropriate procedure at any of these stages may result in incorrect results.
o The Invasion Plasmid Antigen H (ipaH) gene target is present in Shigella spp. and Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC). A
positive result for Shigella spp. that is not confirmed by culture may be due to the presence of nonviable organism,
differences in LOD between the methods or the presence of EIEC in the sample.
o stx1 gene can also be present in some Shigella spp. and is genetically indistinguishable from the stx1 gene of STEC.
The stx genes are mobile genetic elements and their presence has been reported in other members of
Enterobacteriaceae [15].
o The stx2 genotype stx2f is not detected with the EntericBio realtime® Dx assay. Reported detections of the stx2f
genotype in clinical samples from humans are rare.
o Mutations or polymorphisms in either primer or probe binding regions may have an impact on the detection of the
targets, resulting in sub-optimal detection or a false negative result with the EntericBio realtime® Dx.
o In case of extremely low levels of target, below the analytical sensitivity of the assay, the target may be detected, but
results may not be reproducible.
o Strongly positive targets present in the sample may interfere with the detection of other targets present at low
concentrations (near the assay detection limit) within the reaction resulting in sub-optimal detection or a false negative
result due to PCR competition between targets in the multiplex reaction.
o Fluorescence leakage (cross-talk) may occur on the real-time PCR instruments between detection channels with
overlapping wavelengths. This can result in a weak false positive signal being detected due to crosstalk from a strongly
positive signal in the same reaction well.
o Laboratories that refer stx1/stx2 positive results to national STEC reference labs for confirmation should note that
anomalies may arise due to inherent differences between the EntericBio realtime® method and the method employed by
the reference laboratory.
o C. insulaenigrae when present at very high copy numbers may be detected in addition to C. jejuni/coli/lari due to
incomplete but significant sequence homology in the probe binding region. Reported cases of C. insulaenigrae from
suspected cases of enteritis in humans are rare.
o Vibrio furnissii, mimicus, fluvialis will be detected in the Vibrio assay. These organisms have been associated with
gastroenteritis in humans 32-34
o Vibrio diazotrophicus, proteolyticus, natrigiens, alginolytics, when present at very high copy numbers, may be detected
in the Vibrio assay, however reported cases from suspected cases of enteritis in humans are rare.
o Cryptosporidium spp. cuniculus / meleagridis / ubiquitum and Cryptosporidium Horse genotype may be detected in
addition to C. parvum and C. hominis due to significant sequence homology in the probe binding region. Nevertheless,
reports of human infections with these species are rare. 35
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 20 of 22
o In-silico sequence analysis of Giardia canis, Giardia bovis and Giardia cati (assemblage C, D, E, F) suggest that these
may be detected in addition to G. intestinalis due to significant sequence homology in the probe binding region, however
these have not been reported in humans.
o Tests of clearance or status of asymptomatic carriage of Salmonella should include testing from a routine 24 hr
enrichment broth with the EntericBio realtime® assay and/or routine enriched culture. This should also be considered
where testing is requested on non-liquid stool samples submitted as part of a clinical follow up on patients with a recent
clinical history of foreign travel associated gastroenteritis.
o Cross-reactivity with organisms other than those listed in the Exclusivity table has not been evaluated.
o Faecal samples that have been stored outside of the specimen transport and storage requirements of the EntericBio
realtime® Dx assay may lead to false negative results. Optimum performance is achieved when testing fresh samples.
o The performance of the test has been evaluated on human stool specimens only.
o The performance of the EntericBio realtime® Dx has not been evaluated on immunocompromised individuals and
patients without symptoms of gastroenteritis.
o Positive and Negative Predictive values depend greatly on the disease prevalence and therefore the performance of the
EntericBio realtime® Dx assay may vary depending on the prevalence and population evaluated.
References
1. Grimont PAD, Weill F-X. Antigenic formulae of the salmonellae serovars (9th ed.) 2007;
http://www.pasteur.fr/sante/clre/cadrecnr/salmoms/WKLM_2007.pdf
2. Gal-Mor O., Voyle E. C., Grassl G. A. 2014 Same species, different diseases: how and why typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella
enterica serovars differ. Front Microbiol Aug 4;5: 391
3. Li Y., Cao B., Liu B., Liu D., Gao Q., Peng X., Wu J., Bastin D. A., Feng L., Wand L. 2009. Molecular detection of all 34 distinct O-antigen
forms of Shigella. J Med Microbiol: 58: 69-81.
4. Khan W. A., Griffiths J. K., Bennish M. L. 2013. Gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal manifestations of childhood shigellosis in a region
where all four species of Shigella are endemic. PLoS One; May 17;8(5)
5. Gould L. H. et al. 2009. Recommendations for diagnosis of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections by clinical laboratories.
MMWR Recomm Rep; 58 (RR12): 1-14.
6. Morandi E., Grassi C., Cellerino P., Massara P. P., Corsi F., Trabucchi E. 2003. Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli EH 0157:H7
colitis. J Clin Gastroenterol; 36:44-6.
7. Siegler R., Oakes R. 2005. Hemolytic uremic syndrome; pathogenesis, treatment, and outcome. Curr Opin Pediatr; 5;17:200-4.
8. Gavin, P. J., et al. 2004. Evaluation of performance and potential clinical impact of ProSpecT Shiga toxin Escherichia coli microplate
assay for detection of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in stool samples. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:1652–1656.
9. Nielsen, E. M., Scheutz F., Torpdahl M. 2006. Continuous surveillance of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections by pulsed-field
gel electrophoresis shows that most infections are sporadic. Food Pathog. Dis. 3:81–87.
10. Safdar, N., Said A., Gangnon R. E., Maki D. G. 2002. Risk of haemolytic uremic syndrome after antibiotic treatment of Escherichia coli
O157:H7 enteritis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288:996–1001.
11. Bari M. L., Hossain M. A., Isshiki K., Ukuku D. 2011. Behavior of Yersinia enterocolitica in Foods. J Pathog 2011:420732. doi:
10.4061/2011/420732.
12. Fredriksson-Ahomaa M., Stolle A., Stephan R. 2007. Prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in pigs slaughtered at a Swiss
abattoir. Int J Food Microbiol Nov 1:119(3): 207-12.
13. Laukkanen-Ninios R., Fredriksson-Ahomaa M., Maijala R., Korkeala H. 2014. High prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in pig
cheeks. Food Microbiol Oct:43:50-2.
14. Kaysner C. A., DePaola A. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. Chapter 9: Vibrio, Food and Drug Administration.
15. Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections associated with eating raw oysters and clams harvested from Long Island Sound – Connecticut, New
Jersey and New York. 1998. MWWR: 47:457-62
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 21 of 22
16. Snelling W. J, Matsuda M., Moore J. E., Dooley J. S. 2005. Campylobacter jejuni. Lett Appl Microbiol; 41:297-302
17. Bullman S., O’Leary J., Corcoran D., Sleator R. D., Lucey B. 2012. Molecular-based detection of non-culturable and emerging
campylobacteria in patients presenting with gastroenteritis. Epidemiol Infect. Apr; 140(4): 684-8.
18. Thomas P. K. Peripheral neuropathy. In: Ledingham JGG, Warrell DA, editors. Concise Oxford Textbook of Medicine.Vol 1. Oxford:
Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 1375.
19. On S. L. 1996. Identification methods for campylobacters, helicobacters and related organisms. Clin Microbiol Rev; 9(3): 405-22.
20. O’Leary J., Corcoran D., Lucey B. 2009. Comparison of the EntericBio multiplex PCR system with routine culture for detection of bacterial
enteric pathogens. J Clin Microbiol. 47(11): 3449-53.
21. Investigation of Faecal Specimens for Enteric Pathogens. UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations. Standards Unit, Microbiology
Services, Public Health England: Bacteriology | B 30 | Issue no: 8.1 | Issue date: 24.04.14 | Page: 1 of 41
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/343955/B_30i8.1.pdf
22. Caccio, S.M., Thompson R. C. A, McLauchlin J., Smith H. V. 2005. Unravelling Cryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology. Trends in
Parasitology: 21(9), 430-437. Version 1.02 18 19/7/10
23. Budu-Amoako E., Greenwood S. J., Dixon B. R., Barkema H. W., McClure J. T. 2012. Giardia and Cryptosporidium on dairy farms and
the role these farms may play in contaminating water sources in Prince Edward Island, Canada. J Vet Intern Med. 26(3): 668-73.
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012. Cryptosporidiosis Surveillance – United States, 2009-2010 and Giardiasis
Surveillance – United States, 2009-2010. MMWR 61(5).
25. Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar. Bench Aids. DPDx Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis. Center for Disease Control and
Prevention. Online resources: http://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/resources/pdf/benchAids/Entamoeba_benchaid.pdf
26. Investigation of Specimens other than Blood for Parasites. UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations. Standards Unit, Microbiology
Services, Public Health England: Bacteriology | B 31 | Issue no: 4.1 | Issue date: 09.05.14 | Page: 2 of 48
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/343958/B_31i4.1.pdf
27. Chiu C. H. and Ou J. T. 1996. Rapid identification of Salmonella serovars in feces by specific detection of virulence genes, invA and
spvC, by an enrichment broth culture-multiplex PCR combination assay. J Clin Microbiol. Oct; 34(10): 2619–2622.
28. Stensvold Cr. R., Nielsen H. V. 2012. Comparison of microscopy and PCR for detection of intestinal parasites in Danish patients supports
an incentive for molecular screening platforms. J Clin Microbiol 50(2): 540-1.
29. Chalmers R. M., Campbell B. M., Crouch N., Charlett a., Davies A. P. 2011. Comparison of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of seven
Cryptosporidium assays used in the UK. J Med Microbiol 60(Pt 11): 1598-604.
30. ten Hove R., Schuurman T., Kooistra M., Möller L., van Lieshout L., Verweij J. J. 2007. Detection of diarrhoea-causing protozoa in
general practice patients in The Netherlands by multiplex real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect 13(10):1001-7
31. Derber C., Coudron P., Tarr C., Gladney L., Turnsek M., Shankaran S., Wong E. 2011. Vibrio furnissii: an unusual cause of bacteremia
and skin lesions after ingestion of seafood. J Clin Micro 49(6):2348-9.
32. Igbinosa E. O., Okoh A. I. 2010. Vibrio fluvialis: an unusual enteric pathogen of increasing public health concern. Int J Environ Res Public
Health, 7(10):3628-43.
33. Chitov T, Kirikaew P, Yungyune P, Ruengprapan N, Sontikun K. An incidence of large foodborne outbreak associated with Vibrio
mimicus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Apr;28(4):421-4.
34. Robinson G., Elwin K., Chalmers R.M. 2008. Unusual Cryptosporidium genotypes in human cases of diarrhea. Emerg Infect Dis.
14(11):1800-2
EBRT 63 rev 03 Page 22 of 22
Glossary
Manufacturer
Use by Date
In vitro diagnostic medical device
Catalogue Number
Limit of Temperature
Consult instructions for use
Batch Code
Contains sufficient for <n> tests
CE conformity
Do not reuse