engineering yeast to produce proteins for x-ray crystallography: heterologous expression of l. major...
TRANSCRIPT
Engineering yeast to produce proteins for X-ray
Crystallography: Heterologous Expression of L.
MAJOR proteins in the yeast S. cerevisiae
Justification for producing proteins in a eukaryotic host
- limitations of expression in E. coli
- solubility
- post-translational modifications of many eukaryotic proteins
-advantage of S. cerevisiae for analysis of protein complexes
- complexes best defined in yeast
- homologous expression
OBJECT: Develop tools to produce proteins for structural analysis in the yeast S. cerevisiae; emphasis on soluble protein complexes
Features:
• Highly regulated control (PGAL)
• Extensive sequence verifiication
• Clonal: single plasmid (E. coli) and yeast
• C terminal tag
ORF Tag: H6 HA 3c ZZ
MORF collection: A genomic array of ORF expression plasmids in yeast designed for protein purification
PGAL1
attB attB’
Analyze expression in yeast
Control time of expression
Functional membrane proteins
new
Summary of MORF collection
ORF targets: 6,426
ORFs cloned and sent for sequencing 6,376
ORFs with correct sequence, two directions 5,854 (93.2%)
fully sequenced ORFs 3,217 (55%)
partially sequenced ORFs (~1100 bp ea) 2,637 (45%)
Yoshiko Kon
Mike White
Martha Wilkinson
Eric Phizicky, Mark Dumont, Mike Snyder, Dan Gelperin
Expression & Purification from yeast sufficient forX-ray crystallography
LEVLFQ/GPGP
3C HA ZZdomain 2 URA3MORF PGAL attB ORF His6 attB
IgG
IgG
AR
O8
RA
D6
TP
D3
LY
S1
TK
L1
TK
L1
HS
H6-
3C-1
0g
H6-
3C-2
g
MW
-0.
4g
CK
A1
AP
N2
LY
S2
AL
A1
UR
A7
EN
O1
ME
T22
HS
SA
M1
HS
SO
D1
ME
T22
AD
E12
SA
M1
2 g
10
g
Yield: up to 0.5 mg/liter at OD = 1
Steps in development of yeast as an expression host
1. Developed vectors for high level expression, efficient purification and determination of protein interactions
2. Solved problem with selenomethionine incorporation in yeast to allow use of MAD phasing in yeast
3. Tested heterologous expression of L. major proteins in yeast - expression and solubility are good. (Direct evidence that expression in yeast resolves solubility issue for many proteins.)
Dual expression vectors feature Bi-directional GAL promoter:2 ORFs expressed from each vector- different tags on each ORFCan express up to 4 ORFs per cell with 2 selectable markers
A Suite of LIC-LIC vectors to express up to 4 proteins per cell
2 URA3
ORF2 ORF1-tag
Vectors for High Level Expression of Affinity Tagged Proteins
ORF1-3C-HA-H6-ZZ
ORF1-3C-HA-H6-ZZ
ORF1-3C-HA-H6-ZZ
ORF2 (untagged)
His6-ORF2
His10-ORF2
2 URA3CYC terminator ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZ2 URA3CYC terminator ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZ
2 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZ2 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZ
2 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZHis62 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZHis6
2 URA3 ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZHis6CYC terminator2 URA3 ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZHis6CYC terminator
2 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZHis102 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZHis10
2 URA3 ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZHis10CYC terminator2 URA3 ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZHis10CYC terminator
ORF1-3C-HA-H6-ZZ
ORF1-3C-HA-H6-ZZ
His6-ORF2
His10-ORF2
2 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZHis62 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZHis6
2 URA3 ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZHis6CYC terminator2 URA3 ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZHis6CYC terminator
2 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZHis102 LEU2CYC terminator ORF4 PGAL1,10 ORF3 3C site HA H6 ZZHis10
2 URA3 ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZHis10CYC terminator2 URA3 ORF2 PGAL1,10 ORF1 3C site HA H6 ZZHis10CYC terminator
Feature: co-purification indicates complex formation
Different tags on ORF1 and ORF2 allow multistep affinity purification
Step 1: IgG sepharose bind and elute with 3C protease
Vectors with His6 (His 10) used to learn about co-purification
Step 2: IMAC binding and elution with imidazole
His 6 (10) available after IgG step
Trm112/Trm9 complexM
W,
0.4u
g
3CH
is6,
5ug
15 u
g
50 u
g
5 ug
Trm112
Trm9Purification: IgG-Talon-Sizing
Yield: 10.2 mg from 22 liters
Good yield and purity of yeast protein complexes.
Steps in development of yeast as an expression host
1. Developed vectors for high level expression, efficient purification and determination of protein interactions
2. Solved problem with selenomethionine incorporation in yeast to allow use of MAD phasing in yeast
3. Tested heterologous expression of L. major proteins in yeast - expression and solubility are good. (Direct evidence that expression in yeast resolves solubility issue for many proteins.)
√
Methionine S-adenosylmethionineSAM1
SAM2
Delete SAM1 and SAM2 genes.
XX
XX- Mutants that do not convert methionine to S-adenosylmethionine grow on toxic levels of selenomethionine
Blocking conversion of SeMet to S-adenosylSeMetsolves the selenomethionine problem in yeast
- Proteins are produced efficiently in sam1-sam2- mutants when grown in media with selenomethionine
Selenomethionine substitution works in this strain
Met Peptide:LNSANLMVVNHDAQFFPR
Loss of met peptide with increasing selenomethionine concentration
[Selenomethionine] mM
0 0.2 0.375 0.5
Pep
tid
es r
elat
ive
abu
nd
ance
0
20
50
70
met peptide
0.1
selmet peptide
Appearance of corresponding selmet peptide
Alan Friedman
Representative Electron Density for yeast WRS1.
- MAD experimental electron density for Met-169, Met-174, & Met-360.
-Three selenium atoms within Met side chains are clearly defined. Mike Malkowski
MAD phasing works with proteins made in this strain: Structure of Wrs1p (tryptophan tRNA synthetase) solved with MAD.
Steps in development of yeast as an expression host
1. Developed vectors for high level expression, efficient purification and determination of protein interactions
2. Solved problem with selenomethionine incorporation in yeast to allow use of MAD phasing in yeast
3. Tested heterologous expression of L. major proteins in yeast - expression and solubility are good. (Direct evidence that expression in yeast resolves solubility issue for many proteins.)
√
√
Rationale for producing proteins in a yeast is that many
eukaryotic proteins are insoluble when expressed in E. coli
Limitations of E. coli - solubilityExpression & solubility of T Brucei ORFs expressed in E. coli
expression (SDS lysates)
solubility (crude extracts)
MW markers
insoluble
soluble
Does expression in yeast correct solubility problem?
Test yeast as an expression host for heterologous genes
Approach:Examine expression in yeast of L. major ORFs previously examined in E. Coli
Class Number of ORFs
Expression in E. coli
Soluble protein in E. coli
Test 64 Good Poor
Positive control 8 Good Good
Negative control 11 Poor
RC
T M
W m
ix
Mag
ic M
ark
QB
517A
QB
517A
QB
518A
QB
518A
QB
519A
QB
519A
QB
520A
QB
520A
93.8
61.554.860
5040
30
20
kDa
58 79 67 81
QB
516A
QB
516A
55
Expression & solubility of L. major ORFs in yeast.
GREEN: Total Protein-Hot SDSRED: Soluble Protein
Detection of L major ORFs in Crude Extract by Western
Test Pos Neg
High
Medium
Low
None
Groups of L. major ORFs
Nu
mb
er
of
OR
Fs
0
5
10
15
20
25
Most of the L major ORFs are expressed in yeast
Pos = Positive control
Neg = negative control
0. 0%
20. 0%
40. 0%
60. 0%
80. 0%
100. 0%
120. 0%
A B C0 %
20 %
60 %
100 %
Test Pos Neg
Solubility of ORFs in Each Group
Pe
rce
nt
of
OR
Fs Good solubility
Insoluble
Partial solubilityPoor solubility
Most test L major proteins are soluble in yeast
Groups of L. major ORFs
Pos = Positive control
-
6.5kd
14.4kd
21.5kd
31.0kd
45.0kd
66.2kd97.4kd
116kd
4487
6598
8264
2759
6864
6586
7489
6168
5499
Lmaj ID#:
L. Major ORFS bind IgG sepharose - folded
IgG
IgG
6976Lmaj ID#:
Purification of an L. Major ORF on IgG with 3C protease elution
On
IgG
bea
dsP
ost-
1st I
gG b
eads
Pos
t-2n
d Ig
G b
eads
1st E
lutio
n
2nd
Elu
tion
IgG
IgG
Lyse cell
Bind to IgG
Cleavage with 3CWash
Wash
108100.0%High2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase5499
84100.0%Highsmall G-protein, putative6168
140100.0%Highanion-transporting ATPase7489
96100.0%Highn-acyl-l-amino acid amidohydrolase4487
9683.3%Highbeta-fructosidase-like protein ,8264
160100.0%Highflagellar protofilament ribbon6864
12066.7%Highmethyltransferase, putative6679
120100.0%Highcaltractin, putative6598
100100.0%Highphenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase2759
16083.3%HighGMP synthase2393
1683.3%Highserine peptidase 4763
140100.0%Highglucokinase 1-like protein6586
24083.3%HighSAM decarboxylase proenzyme4089
120100.0%High'monoglyceride lipase, 4486
88100.0%Mediumsterol 24-c-methyltransferase, 6593
200100.0%Mediumcyclin 1,serine peptidase6976
Yield: g per OD liter
Percent soluble
Express-ion in yeastPutative function of protein
L majorORF
108100.0%High2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase5499
84100.0%Highsmall G-protein, putative6168
140100.0%Highanion-transporting ATPase7489
96100.0%Highn-acyl-l-amino acid amidohydrolase4487
9683.3%Highbeta-fructosidase-like protein ,8264
160100.0%Highflagellar protofilament ribbon6864
12066.7%Highmethyltransferase, putative6679
120100.0%Highcaltractin, putative6598
100100.0%Highphenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase2759
16083.3%HighGMP synthase2393
1683.3%Highserine peptidase 4763
140100.0%Highglucokinase 1-like protein6586
24083.3%HighSAM decarboxylase proenzyme4089
120100.0%High'monoglyceride lipase, 4486
88100.0%Mediumsterol 24-c-methyltransferase, 6593
200100.0%Mediumcyclin 1,serine peptidase6976
Yield: g per OD liter
Percent soluble
Express-ion in yeastPutative function of protein
L majorORF
Yields of 15 proteins within range for structure
Steps in development of yeast as an expression host
1. Developed vectors for high level expression, efficient purification and determination of protein interactions
2. Solved problem with selenomethionine incorporation in yeast to allow use of MAD phasing in yeast
3. Tested heterologous expression of L. major proteins in yeast - expression and solubility are good. (Direct evidence that expression in yeast resolves solubility issue for many proteins.)
√
√
√
Erin Quartley Mike MalkowskiEric Phizicky
George deTitta
THANKS to:
Yoshiko Kon
Mark Dumont
Frederick Buckner and Wim Hol