engineering, language, and questions

36
Engineers, Language & Questions: The Effective Use of Speech in Action, Creation & Inquiry David E. Goldberg Illinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering Education University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL 61801 USA [email protected] © David E. Goldberg 2010

Upload: david-e-goldberg

Post on 18-Nov-2014

1.495 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Language is central to engineering thought and action, but its role is obscured by the emphasis on math and science in an engineering education. This talk uses results commonplace in leadership coaching and speech act theory to examine the central role of language in engineering, especially in action, creation, and inquiry. The talk concludes with discussion of the role of the interpretation of distinctions in stories as a way to become a better engineering communicator.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Engineering, Language, and Questions

Engineers, Language & Questions:The Effective Use of Speech in Action, Creation & Inquiry

David E. GoldbergIllinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering EducationUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana, IL 61801 [email protected]

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Page 2: Engineering, Language, and Questions

Math-Science Masks Language Import

• Was reading Sheri Sheppard’s (Stanford) book, Educating Engineers

• “The language of engineering is mathematics.”

• Math is important way to think, create, and communicate.

• But primary language of engineering is language.

• Reflect on language and its importance in engineering thought, action & tie to the master missing basic (questioning).

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Page 3: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Roadmap

• What do engineers actually do and make (themselves)?

• 3 new ways to think about language.• How does language work & speech act

theory.• Assertions, assessments, offers,

promises, agreements, and declarations.• Language as a tool for engineering

action & creativity.• The missing basics revisited, with

emphasis on questions and listening.• Stories, distinctions, and mindset.

Page 4: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

2 Questions

• What do engineers actually do during the day?

• What artifacts do engineers actually produce themselves?

Page 5: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Language Central to Engineering Work!

• Engineers do math occasionally.• Engineers draw or sketch occasionally.• Engineers build or construct (themselves)

very rarely • Engineers use language constantly (in

person, on paper, on computer or other electronic device).

• Takes many forms & purposes.• Familiar with language as describing.• Focus on language in creation and action.

John R. Searle (b. 1932)

Page 6: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

What is Language?

• What is language?• What do we do with it?• No one right answer here.• What do you think?

Page 7: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Language: Conventional vs. New View

Conventional

• Language separate from human life.

• Language a descriptive tool for communication.

• Language is merely an extension of thinking.

New View

• We are linguistic beings living in language all the time.

• Language is generative & creative (not passive & descriptive).

• Language is action. To speak is to act.

Page 8: Engineering, Language, and Questions

Speech Act Theory: How Language Works

• Speech acts: Many different types.• Can describe, promise, command, etc.• Austin defined “illocutionary act:”

– Speaker says something.– Means something by it.– Tries to communicate what he means to

hearer.• Distinction between propositional content and

force or type of the speech act.• Examples:

– Please leave the room.– Will you leave the room?– You will leave the room.

J. L. Austin (1911-1960)

Page 9: Engineering, Language, and Questions

The Illocutionary 5

• Speech acts have 5 illocutionary points or types:– Assertive: commit to the truth.– Expressive: speaker expresses

opinion about state of the world.– Directive: direct hearer to do

something.– Commissive: speaker promises

to do something.– Declarations: speaker creates

something with utterance.John R. Searle (b.

1932)

Page 10: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Brief History of Leadership Coaching

• Carlos Fernando Flores• Chilean engineer & politician.• PhD student of Searle & Stuart

& Hubert Dreyfus at Berkeley.• Pioneered use of philosophy

of language in coordinating action in late 70s.

• Julio Ollala founded Newfield Network (1991) after working with Flores. Fernando Flores (b.

1943)

Page 11: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Speech Acts in Practice

• Assertions, assessments & ladder of inference.

• Requests & promises.• An aside on complaints.• Offers.• Agreements & coordinating

action.• Declarations & organizational

creativity.

Page 12: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Assertions versus Assessments

• Assertions committed to the truth.• Assessments committed to expressing an opinion.• Contrast

– It’s 60 degrees C outside (assertion).– It’s very hot (assessment).

• False assertions still assertions (still committed to the truth).• Assessment can be supported

– by evidence – agreement of others– But it is still an assessment (supported or grounded

assessment).

Page 13: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

From Data Judgment in 10 ns

• Set of things happen in an event.• Our minds immediately interpret the facts and

jump to conclusions.• Lightening quick process.• Making the distinction between assertion and

assessment (between facts and interpretations) key to open discourse.

Page 14: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Ladder of Inference

• Popularized by Senge’s Fifth Discipline.

• Attributed to Chris Agyris.

• How do we make inferences from sense data?

Page 15: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

How to Invite Open Communication

• Problem occurs when people offer judgments and assessments as fact.

• Two things:– Be clear about whether something involves opinion or

judgment (err on conservative side).– Do not use assertive force when making assessments

or provide support.• Soften via mind-state qualifier or assessment support:– “He is tall.” “I believe he is tall.”– “He is tall.” “He is relatively tall for men in this town.”

Page 16: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

An Aside on Complaints

• Think of a complaint you made against another person.

• Choose a complaint against a person, not an institution.

• What was the essence of your complaint?

Page 17: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Structure of (Unreasonable) Complaints

• Unreasonable complaints occur in situations –where an implicit agreement is thought to exist –when no explicit request (or an inadequate

request) was made.• Solution:– Stop complaining and –make better requests!!!!

Page 18: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Anatomy of a Proper Request

• 6 Things:– Engaged speaker– Engaged listener– Future action– Time of completion– Conditions of satisfaction– Shared context

• Works for proper promise (commitment).• What goes wrong in requests & promises?

Page 19: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Anatomy of an Offer

• An offer is a conditional promise.• If you do X, I will do Y.• Y is a promise.• X can be a promise.

Page 20: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Agreements & Coordinating Action

• Simple agreements: Requestacceptance & Offeracceptance

• More usual complex cycle of coordinating action:– Customer/performer requests or offers.– Customer/performer negotiate & agree.– Performer delivers on agreement.– Customer/performer assess results.

Page 21: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Anatomy of Declarations

• Change the state of the world according to the propositional content.

• Speaker commitment: At some time after this statement, the world will be different as specified in the statement.

• Examples:– “I pronounce you man and wife.” initiate– “You are hereby divorced.” terminate– “We find you guilty of murdering your husband.”

resolve• Also can consider effective versus verdictive declarations.

Page 22: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Declarations are Creative

• Creation of new programs occurs in part because of declarations:–We will establish a Design-Centric Curriculum

to align engineering education with the imperatives of the 21st century.

– The iCommunity and iTeams will help unleash intrinsic motivation in our students by aligning what they do in school with who they want to become.

Page 23: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Declaration Specifications

• 5 items:– Engaged declarer.– Audience to whom declaration is relevant.– Time at which declaration takes place.– What will take place.– Shared background of the declaration.

• In agreements, specificity is generally a virtue.• In declarations, vagueness can enlist the creativity of

others.• iFoundry example.

Page 24: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Why Does This Matter to Engineers?

• Engineers think, speak, and write to build things in the world.– They rarely build anything

themselves.– Coordinating action well will get more

effective action done more quickly.• “Scientists study the world as it is;

engineers create the world that never has been.” – To create a world that has never been

requires declarations– Followed by effective action.

• Effective use of language is central to being a great engineer.

Theodore von Karman (1881-1963)

Page 25: Engineering, Language, and Questions

The Missing Basics of Engineering

• After 4 years they don’t know how to– Question: Socrates 101.– Label: Aristotle 101.– Model conceptually: Hume 101 & Aristotle 102.– Decompose: Descartes 101.– Measure: Bacon-Locke 101.– Visualize/draw: da Vinci-Monge 101.– Communicate: Newman 101

• Call these the missing basics (MBs) vs. “the basics” = math, sci, & eng sci.

• Missing basics are in some sense more basic than “the basics.”

• Philosophy useful in two ways: (a) reflection leads to list & (b) philosophical method as way to conceptual modeling and clarity.

Socrates (470-399 BCE)

25 © David E. Goldberg 2010

Page 26: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Master Tool of Language: Questions

• Missing basics revisited.• Note how MBs are qualitative:

largely concerned with language.

• Number one missing basic is questions. Why important?– When you’re talking you’re

not listening.– When you’re questioning,

you’re forced to listen.

Page 27: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Many Types of Questions

• Distinguish between closed-ended and open-ended questions– Closed-ended questions have definite answer with limited

scope.– Open-ended questions have wide range of possible

answers.– Both useful.

• Gathering info: Closed-ended questions largely useful for gathering information

• Curiosity: Open-ended questions useful for exploration & discovery.

• Creativity: OE questions also good for reframing, and creativity.

Page 28: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

How Do People Answer Questions?

• 3 main possibilities:–With answer to a different question:

misunderstood or understood and evading.– Short answer.– A story.

• Listening carefully can gather info properly and redirect speaker to desired question.

• Stories very important.• How do you listen to a story?

Page 29: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Level One & Level Two Listening

• Level-one listening: – Like a conversation. – Partner says one thing and

you reflect on it with personal experience.

• Level-two listening:– More one-sided.– Partner says one thing, and

you ask another question, urge continuation, and listen to distinctions.

Page 30: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Story is the Horse

• “Story is the horse distinctions ride in on.” Neil Stroul

• What’s a distinction:– Distinction is a term or terms

that divides or dimensionalizes a conceptual space.

– Simple distinction versus opposition versus spatial exemplar.

• Examples of distinctions:– Rigor– Category creator vs. category

enhancer

Page 31: Engineering, Language, and Questions

Cold War Version iFoundry VersionPostwar stability Missed revolutions

Category enhancer Category creator

“The basics” The “missing basics”

Narrow specialist Dynamic T

Rigor = math/science rigor Rigor = math/sci + conceptual rigor

Soft skills mysterious Soft skills enumerable, learnable & rigorous

Math-Sci death march: passage rite Design challenge: passage rite

Engineers as socially captive Engineers as visionaries or leaders

Conceptual Shifts

Page 32: Engineering, Language, and Questions

Engin School Version iFoundry VersionChange as local, incremental & episodic.

Change as systemic, transformative & continuing.

Isolated center/institute/dept as locus.

Dot-connecting incubator as locus.

Plan-implement as mode. Ongoing pilot & diffusion as mode.

Individual units innovate separately Units collaborate on pilots.

One size fits all & override governance during change.

Respect diversity of culture & governance during change.

Closed stagnation as usual. Open innovation as usual.

Isolated from key stakeholders. Connected to key stakeholders.

Faculty-centered process. Student-centered process.

Organizational Shifts

Page 33: Engineering, Language, and Questions

Engin School Version iFoundry VersionCollege similar to high school College profoundly different from HS

Engineering joyless, rational & instrumental application of math & science

Engineering joyful creative invention of technological artifacts & systems serving human needs

One size fits all as chosen by faculty Student aspirations/choices different

Quantitative skills sufficient Qual-Quant skills balance essential

Students as individual learners Students as community of learners

Faculty control as critical element Student initiative as critical element

Engineering identity develops in time

Unleash engineering identity now

Begin with math-science death march

Begin with end in mind (world of work)

Aspirational Shifts

Page 34: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Creative Part: Stories Can be Rewritten!

• Personal, organizational, and societal stories can be rewritten.

• Understanding your story enables you to reinterpret and rewrite.

• Facts don’t change. Assessments and interpretations do.

• Mindset is key: fixed versus growth.• Positive psych emphasizes positive

change.

Page 35: Engineering, Language, and Questions

© David E. Goldberg 2010

Bottom Line

• To say that engineering is largely math and science is to misunderstand how engineers spend their days.

• Engineers are fish in the water of language.• Use language to create and act through sequence of speech acts.• Attention to assertions, assessments, requests, offers, and

agreements improves quality and efficiency of action.• Attention to declarations creates a new world of possibilities.• Ties to missing basics clear and questions are the master MB.• Stories reveal a lot about a person, an organization, and a

society.• Be more aware of language and become a better engineer.

Page 36: Engineering, Language, and Questions

For More Information

• Illinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering Education (www.ifoundry.illinois.edu).

• Similar powerpoint and other reflections at www.slideshare.net/deg511.

• Coaching and consulting available at www.threejoy.com.

© David E. Goldberg 201036