engineering, language, and questions
DESCRIPTION
Language is central to engineering thought and action, but its role is obscured by the emphasis on math and science in an engineering education. This talk uses results commonplace in leadership coaching and speech act theory to examine the central role of language in engineering, especially in action, creation, and inquiry. The talk concludes with discussion of the role of the interpretation of distinctions in stories as a way to become a better engineering communicator.TRANSCRIPT
Engineers, Language & Questions:The Effective Use of Speech in Action, Creation & Inquiry
David E. GoldbergIllinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering EducationUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana, IL 61801 [email protected]
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Math-Science Masks Language Import
• Was reading Sheri Sheppard’s (Stanford) book, Educating Engineers
• “The language of engineering is mathematics.”
• Math is important way to think, create, and communicate.
• But primary language of engineering is language.
• Reflect on language and its importance in engineering thought, action & tie to the master missing basic (questioning).
© David E. Goldberg 2010
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Roadmap
• What do engineers actually do and make (themselves)?
• 3 new ways to think about language.• How does language work & speech act
theory.• Assertions, assessments, offers,
promises, agreements, and declarations.• Language as a tool for engineering
action & creativity.• The missing basics revisited, with
emphasis on questions and listening.• Stories, distinctions, and mindset.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
2 Questions
• What do engineers actually do during the day?
• What artifacts do engineers actually produce themselves?
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Language Central to Engineering Work!
• Engineers do math occasionally.• Engineers draw or sketch occasionally.• Engineers build or construct (themselves)
very rarely • Engineers use language constantly (in
person, on paper, on computer or other electronic device).
• Takes many forms & purposes.• Familiar with language as describing.• Focus on language in creation and action.
John R. Searle (b. 1932)
© David E. Goldberg 2010
What is Language?
• What is language?• What do we do with it?• No one right answer here.• What do you think?
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Language: Conventional vs. New View
Conventional
• Language separate from human life.
• Language a descriptive tool for communication.
• Language is merely an extension of thinking.
New View
• We are linguistic beings living in language all the time.
• Language is generative & creative (not passive & descriptive).
• Language is action. To speak is to act.
Speech Act Theory: How Language Works
• Speech acts: Many different types.• Can describe, promise, command, etc.• Austin defined “illocutionary act:”
– Speaker says something.– Means something by it.– Tries to communicate what he means to
hearer.• Distinction between propositional content and
force or type of the speech act.• Examples:
– Please leave the room.– Will you leave the room?– You will leave the room.
J. L. Austin (1911-1960)
The Illocutionary 5
• Speech acts have 5 illocutionary points or types:– Assertive: commit to the truth.– Expressive: speaker expresses
opinion about state of the world.– Directive: direct hearer to do
something.– Commissive: speaker promises
to do something.– Declarations: speaker creates
something with utterance.John R. Searle (b.
1932)
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Brief History of Leadership Coaching
• Carlos Fernando Flores• Chilean engineer & politician.• PhD student of Searle & Stuart
& Hubert Dreyfus at Berkeley.• Pioneered use of philosophy
of language in coordinating action in late 70s.
• Julio Ollala founded Newfield Network (1991) after working with Flores. Fernando Flores (b.
1943)
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Speech Acts in Practice
• Assertions, assessments & ladder of inference.
• Requests & promises.• An aside on complaints.• Offers.• Agreements & coordinating
action.• Declarations & organizational
creativity.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Assertions versus Assessments
• Assertions committed to the truth.• Assessments committed to expressing an opinion.• Contrast
– It’s 60 degrees C outside (assertion).– It’s very hot (assessment).
• False assertions still assertions (still committed to the truth).• Assessment can be supported
– by evidence – agreement of others– But it is still an assessment (supported or grounded
assessment).
© David E. Goldberg 2010
From Data Judgment in 10 ns
• Set of things happen in an event.• Our minds immediately interpret the facts and
jump to conclusions.• Lightening quick process.• Making the distinction between assertion and
assessment (between facts and interpretations) key to open discourse.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Ladder of Inference
• Popularized by Senge’s Fifth Discipline.
• Attributed to Chris Agyris.
• How do we make inferences from sense data?
© David E. Goldberg 2010
How to Invite Open Communication
• Problem occurs when people offer judgments and assessments as fact.
• Two things:– Be clear about whether something involves opinion or
judgment (err on conservative side).– Do not use assertive force when making assessments
or provide support.• Soften via mind-state qualifier or assessment support:– “He is tall.” “I believe he is tall.”– “He is tall.” “He is relatively tall for men in this town.”
© David E. Goldberg 2010
An Aside on Complaints
• Think of a complaint you made against another person.
• Choose a complaint against a person, not an institution.
• What was the essence of your complaint?
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Structure of (Unreasonable) Complaints
• Unreasonable complaints occur in situations –where an implicit agreement is thought to exist –when no explicit request (or an inadequate
request) was made.• Solution:– Stop complaining and –make better requests!!!!
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Anatomy of a Proper Request
• 6 Things:– Engaged speaker– Engaged listener– Future action– Time of completion– Conditions of satisfaction– Shared context
• Works for proper promise (commitment).• What goes wrong in requests & promises?
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Anatomy of an Offer
• An offer is a conditional promise.• If you do X, I will do Y.• Y is a promise.• X can be a promise.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Agreements & Coordinating Action
• Simple agreements: Requestacceptance & Offeracceptance
• More usual complex cycle of coordinating action:– Customer/performer requests or offers.– Customer/performer negotiate & agree.– Performer delivers on agreement.– Customer/performer assess results.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Anatomy of Declarations
• Change the state of the world according to the propositional content.
• Speaker commitment: At some time after this statement, the world will be different as specified in the statement.
• Examples:– “I pronounce you man and wife.” initiate– “You are hereby divorced.” terminate– “We find you guilty of murdering your husband.”
resolve• Also can consider effective versus verdictive declarations.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Declarations are Creative
• Creation of new programs occurs in part because of declarations:–We will establish a Design-Centric Curriculum
to align engineering education with the imperatives of the 21st century.
– The iCommunity and iTeams will help unleash intrinsic motivation in our students by aligning what they do in school with who they want to become.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Declaration Specifications
• 5 items:– Engaged declarer.– Audience to whom declaration is relevant.– Time at which declaration takes place.– What will take place.– Shared background of the declaration.
• In agreements, specificity is generally a virtue.• In declarations, vagueness can enlist the creativity of
others.• iFoundry example.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Why Does This Matter to Engineers?
• Engineers think, speak, and write to build things in the world.– They rarely build anything
themselves.– Coordinating action well will get more
effective action done more quickly.• “Scientists study the world as it is;
engineers create the world that never has been.” – To create a world that has never been
requires declarations– Followed by effective action.
• Effective use of language is central to being a great engineer.
Theodore von Karman (1881-1963)
The Missing Basics of Engineering
• After 4 years they don’t know how to– Question: Socrates 101.– Label: Aristotle 101.– Model conceptually: Hume 101 & Aristotle 102.– Decompose: Descartes 101.– Measure: Bacon-Locke 101.– Visualize/draw: da Vinci-Monge 101.– Communicate: Newman 101
• Call these the missing basics (MBs) vs. “the basics” = math, sci, & eng sci.
• Missing basics are in some sense more basic than “the basics.”
• Philosophy useful in two ways: (a) reflection leads to list & (b) philosophical method as way to conceptual modeling and clarity.
Socrates (470-399 BCE)
25 © David E. Goldberg 2010
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Master Tool of Language: Questions
• Missing basics revisited.• Note how MBs are qualitative:
largely concerned with language.
• Number one missing basic is questions. Why important?– When you’re talking you’re
not listening.– When you’re questioning,
you’re forced to listen.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Many Types of Questions
• Distinguish between closed-ended and open-ended questions– Closed-ended questions have definite answer with limited
scope.– Open-ended questions have wide range of possible
answers.– Both useful.
• Gathering info: Closed-ended questions largely useful for gathering information
• Curiosity: Open-ended questions useful for exploration & discovery.
• Creativity: OE questions also good for reframing, and creativity.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
How Do People Answer Questions?
• 3 main possibilities:–With answer to a different question:
misunderstood or understood and evading.– Short answer.– A story.
• Listening carefully can gather info properly and redirect speaker to desired question.
• Stories very important.• How do you listen to a story?
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Level One & Level Two Listening
• Level-one listening: – Like a conversation. – Partner says one thing and
you reflect on it with personal experience.
• Level-two listening:– More one-sided.– Partner says one thing, and
you ask another question, urge continuation, and listen to distinctions.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Story is the Horse
• “Story is the horse distinctions ride in on.” Neil Stroul
• What’s a distinction:– Distinction is a term or terms
that divides or dimensionalizes a conceptual space.
– Simple distinction versus opposition versus spatial exemplar.
• Examples of distinctions:– Rigor– Category creator vs. category
enhancer
Cold War Version iFoundry VersionPostwar stability Missed revolutions
Category enhancer Category creator
“The basics” The “missing basics”
Narrow specialist Dynamic T
Rigor = math/science rigor Rigor = math/sci + conceptual rigor
Soft skills mysterious Soft skills enumerable, learnable & rigorous
Math-Sci death march: passage rite Design challenge: passage rite
Engineers as socially captive Engineers as visionaries or leaders
Conceptual Shifts
Engin School Version iFoundry VersionChange as local, incremental & episodic.
Change as systemic, transformative & continuing.
Isolated center/institute/dept as locus.
Dot-connecting incubator as locus.
Plan-implement as mode. Ongoing pilot & diffusion as mode.
Individual units innovate separately Units collaborate on pilots.
One size fits all & override governance during change.
Respect diversity of culture & governance during change.
Closed stagnation as usual. Open innovation as usual.
Isolated from key stakeholders. Connected to key stakeholders.
Faculty-centered process. Student-centered process.
Organizational Shifts
Engin School Version iFoundry VersionCollege similar to high school College profoundly different from HS
Engineering joyless, rational & instrumental application of math & science
Engineering joyful creative invention of technological artifacts & systems serving human needs
One size fits all as chosen by faculty Student aspirations/choices different
Quantitative skills sufficient Qual-Quant skills balance essential
Students as individual learners Students as community of learners
Faculty control as critical element Student initiative as critical element
Engineering identity develops in time
Unleash engineering identity now
Begin with math-science death march
Begin with end in mind (world of work)
Aspirational Shifts
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Creative Part: Stories Can be Rewritten!
• Personal, organizational, and societal stories can be rewritten.
• Understanding your story enables you to reinterpret and rewrite.
• Facts don’t change. Assessments and interpretations do.
• Mindset is key: fixed versus growth.• Positive psych emphasizes positive
change.
© David E. Goldberg 2010
Bottom Line
• To say that engineering is largely math and science is to misunderstand how engineers spend their days.
• Engineers are fish in the water of language.• Use language to create and act through sequence of speech acts.• Attention to assertions, assessments, requests, offers, and
agreements improves quality and efficiency of action.• Attention to declarations creates a new world of possibilities.• Ties to missing basics clear and questions are the master MB.• Stories reveal a lot about a person, an organization, and a
society.• Be more aware of language and become a better engineer.
For More Information
• Illinois Foundry for Innovation in Engineering Education (www.ifoundry.illinois.edu).
• Similar powerpoint and other reflections at www.slideshare.net/deg511.
• Coaching and consulting available at www.threejoy.com.
© David E. Goldberg 201036