energy security coal

7/18/2019 Energy Security Coal

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/energy-security-coal 1/8

INDIA’S ENERGY SECURITY: COAL SECTOR

Energy security in India revolves around coal sector, which has dominant use in three core sectors

i.e. power, steel, cement. Coal Industry itself too is part of core sector. Apart from this there is

inconsistent demand from small scale industry involved in brick manufacturing or ceramics. There is

increased impetus on moving away from coal based technologies to cleaner and efficient

technologies, but still demand of coal will continue to rise almost in proportion to industrial growth

in India. This is because base infrastructure in all core sectors is designed for coal consumption and

still India’s supply of power and steel doesn’t match the demand. Even new capacity additions in

these sector using clean energies will fall short of incremental demand and again usage of coal in

capacity addition will be indispensable. India is well placed to fulfill this demand given there is

adequate transparent government policy and reforms in state monopolized sector.

RESERVES IN INDIA

India has 4th

largest reserves of coal and holds about 286 billion of world’s some 850 billion of

proven reserves. Indian coal is classified in 2 categories i.e. coking coal and non-coking coal. This is a

usage based classification, as coking coal is essential for Iron and steel industry.

More, streamlined classification is on basis of carbon content and stage of formation. Coal is

formed by fossils of plants, trees, bushes etc. which got deposited in shallow basins millions of year

ago. Later decomposition by bacteria converts it into peat, which is generally unviable to mine.After this bio- chemical action ceases and geo chemical action becomes dominant. It results in

gradual development of Lignite, Bituminous and Anthracite coal. Peat is Impure, has very low

carbon content (in turn calorific value) of about 40%. Lignite, bituminous, anthracite coal has

carbon content of 40-60%, 60-80% and 80-90% respectively. Remaining matter in the coal is called

volatile material such as moisture, ash content and sulfur content. These are gradually removed by

metamorphic process i.e. pressure and heat.

Bituminous coal has special significance because it contains Bitumen which on heating in absence of

oxygen is converted into coking coal. This removes volatile material in the coal and is further



heated to get Coke, which is used in blast furnaces to extract iron from iron ore.

This type of Coking coal is what India lacks, as 88 % of reserves are of Non Coking type and rest 12

% have high Ash content. Indian Coking Coal is cheap and of poor quality and imported Coking coal

is expensive and good quality. Steel industry blends both to secure a moderate cost and quality.

(Coking coal is used to make Pig iron through blast furnace. Other type of iron ‘sponge iron’ doesn’t

need coking coal instead natural gas is used. India is largest manufacturer of sponge iron in the

world. But most of the big corporates in India are dominantly involved in manufacturing of Pig iron)

COAL SECTOR IN INDIA

India’s coal sector is in almost wholly in hands of Coal India Ltd. (CIL, central government PSU).It

produces about 80 % of national production. In nationalization drive of 1970’s coal mining of India

was nationalized by passage of ‘Coal Mines Nationalization Act, 1973′ and CIL was formed. Only a

few captive mines with Tata Steels, Steel Authority of India and Damodar Valley Corporation weremade exception. Latter, this privilege was extended to power (1993), cement and coal to liquid

sector(2006), in addition to iron and steel(1976). For allotment of mines ‘screening committee’ was

formed in 1993 which had representatives from Coal ministry, states and CIL to consider the



applications and allocate mines to applicants.

Commercial Mining – Mine holder is allowed to sell coal in open market.

Captive mining – Miner will have to use coal in his own industry and can’t sell in open market.

Since 1993 218 mines holding about 16.6% of India’s reserves were allocated were allotted, thesewere in 3 categories –

1. Captive use for above mentioned sectors : with specific end use

2. Central and State government PSUs, with no end use restriction

3. Ultra mega Power projects : Via Competitive bidding

Having said this, production from these reserves has been dismal mainly due to following:

(Screening committee specified time limits for production ranging from 36-54 months from time of

allocation)

1. Delayed environment and forest clearances: Environment ministry under Jairam Ramesh

Classified ecological sensitive areas in ‘Go and No Go areas’. Total prohibition is there on

mining in no go areas. And these areas contain 30 % of total allocated mining reserves. Further

there are other clearances required from State and Central Governments.

2.

Land Acquisition problems

3. Lack of adequate Technology

This resulted in situation where India has to import coal to the tune of 171 million tons. In

comparison Coal India produced 462 million tons of coal. Some Indian companies and also CIL have

acquired coalmines overseas to ensure continuous supply.



In 2012 CAG came out with its report in which issue of non-transparency was raised. At that

time it said that 44 billion tons of coal reserves were allocated to private players whose value is

approx. 1.86 lakh crores. Since then there were series of PILs in Supreme Court pleading to

cancel allocations.

Off late, Supreme Court cancelled allocations since 1993 on the ground of illegality only sparingfew allocations (one of SAIL and three of UMPPs).

Grounds for this action was –

Coal Nationalization Act, 1973 as amended now stands as – Allocation of blocks can only be

made to central government PSU’s (not to state government) for commercial mining or for

captive use of mines for sectors specified by amendments I.e. Iron and Steel, cement, Power

and Coal to liquid sector.

Why allotments were cancelled for Captive blocks held by private players and PSUs?

Allocation process was arbitrary, discretionary and non-transparent. There was no

consideration of Merit, no Price discovery mechanism for national resources (Auction is price

discovery mechanism). Further, no ‘minutes of meeting’ were available of screening committee

meetings to verify what procedure was adopted by them (every government related meeting

needs to prepare Minutes of meeting, which contain discussions, viewpoints, points of

disagreements and consensus etc, for transparency and future reference).To some allocates ,

blocks were allotted having reserves more than their project needs. Screening Committee relied

on data supplied by applicants in arriving at decision.

Law for allocation of natural resources, as upheld by Supreme Court holds that allocation can’t

be done in ‘arbitrary manner’. By this same reasoning Spectrum allocation Licenses were

cancelled.

Why allotments to State PSU’s were cancelled?

As we have seen that, state PSUs got blocks with no end use restriction. It means they can

engage in Commercial Mining i.e. selling coal in open market. But Coal nationalization Law

clearly states that commercial mining can be done only centrally owned PSUs. So they were

cancelled.

Apart from this some allocations were made to joint ventures of private and public, Joint

allocation of Coal Mines to consortium of companies – these were also cancelled.

UMPPs were allowed to transfer coals from or to other project, but Supreme Court held that

law disallows this too.



New government has given approval to an ordinance, empowering government to take back

mines and reallocating it.

But why an ordinance?

Because this all is being done under sanction Coal Mining Nationalization Act and anything

covered by this law can’t be done by an executive order. Amendment is must for legality.

By this ordinance –

1. Government aims to reallocate blocks to captive users through e-auction. There’ll be no

guarantee of getting same block that a company currently holds.

2. Public sector companies/undertakings will get allocated block as per their need on priority

bases.

3.

Government retains option to open commercial mining to private sector.

4. Proceeds from coal blocks will go to respective states. This step was much needed as Coal rich

states such as Jharkhand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh are also poorest states.

5. Foreign companies will not be eligible.

6. Government has retained option to allot blocks to private players for commercial mining.

Issues Involved:

1. When a block is allocated, then company has to buy land above that block from market. Now

when block will be taken back and allotted to some other user that issue of price of transfer of

that land will arise. FM has ensured that adequate mechanism will be put in place for this

problem

2. Other issue is of whether commercial mining should be opened for private players. There are

diverse opinions for this –

Pro private arguments:

1. Coal India is government monopoly and abuses its position, by keeping prices high , supplying

low grade coal, no redressal of customer grievances. Interestingly, Other government PSU NTPC

dragged CIL to ‘Competition Commission of India’ over the similar issues and Coal India was

fined Rs 1773 crores for ‘Anti- competitive Behaviour’

2. When more precious and expensive resource sector Oil and Natural gas is open for private

sector, why discrimination against Coal sector?

3. Coal India is not able to fulfill demand of the economy and it still makes super profits. Cash and

bank balances of CIL are more than Rs 40000 crores. Our electricity sector is dependent on coal

(70%) and there are frequent coal outages at power plants.4. Coal washing (a process which removes impurities and ash content in coal) facilities (washeries)

of CIL are inefficient and steel manufacturers have to depend increasingly on private washeries.



Pro CIL/public ownership arguments:

1. Before 1973’s nationalization, mining was in private hands and then position was even worse.

2. Allocation of captive blocks has revealed incapacity of private sector too. Most of the blocks

were yet to commence production.

3.

Private sector can engage in exports of coal which is not in national interest.

Dominant view is that Commercial mining can be privatized, but for this there should be a strong

regulator. UPA government came with ordinance for ‘Coal regulatory authority of India’ for this

sector but it never became a reality. A similar bill is expected in next session of Lok Sabha.

Others are general issues of mining:

Consent of Gram Sabha should be mandatory before commencement of mining and Some proceeds

of mining revenue should go to ‘Districts Mineral Foundation’ for benefit of affected persons and

their families.

Currently Coal India and other coal suppliers issue ‘letter of assurances’ to their buyers in power

sector mainly NTPC, these are on the basis of ‘Milestones’ to be achieved by power producers(

milestone of good conduct as buyer). After achievement of this milestone ‘Fuel Supply Agreement’

is signed between supplier and buyer. Dominantly these supplier and buyers are only government

entities; even then there is cumbersome process and mutual hostilities, mainly between Coal India

and National Thermal Power Corporation.

In 1993, government created 3 separate ministries (which should be logically 1) I.e. of coal, power

and renewable energy respectively. Coal minister and Power ministers held Cabinet Rank. This

resulted in awkward situation in which two ministries used to work in opposite direction and which

disrupted the speed of clearances, flow of information etc. There were many instances like

nonpayment at time by NTPC to CIL due to allegations of low quality supplies kept surfacing. But

now as Ministry of Power and coal is headed by one minister, that too minister of state, so much

speedy disposal of issues are expected.

CLEAN COAL ENERGIES

COAL BED METHANE

It is natural gas which is found in coal seams in absorbed form. It is similar to natural gas found in in

oil & natural gas blocks (both are CH4). It is clean pipeline gas and can be used almost without any

processing.

Why it is important to extract CBM?



1. Methane is hazard in Mines. Being poisonous, it can cause serious harm to miners. So it is

better to extract this in advance.

2. Methane is very potent greenhouse gas (about 20 times than CO2). So it shouldn’t be let

escape to environment when it can be captured.

3. It is very viable resource. It has good calorific value and about half the emissions that of coal.

Coal Bed Methane Policy is in place from 1997. 4 rounds of auctions have taken place allocating 33

gas blocks. Commercial production has started in some blocks.

Director General of Hydrocarbons, Coal India Ltd and Ministry of Oil and Petroleum cooperate for

CBM policy. For its extraction well is dug through which water in the coal seam is taken out. It

results in reabsorption of methane in pores and through same well CBM is taken out.

Carbon Sequestering: This is technique for ‘enhanced coal bed methane recovery’. Here CO2 will be

pumped in to coal seam. Coal has better absorption capacity of CO2 and it will result in more

desorption of CBM.

COAL GASIFICATION AND LIQUEFACTION

This gives Methane, Hydrogen, Carbon monoxide by combination of Coal, Water and oxygen. Theseproducts can be used for power generation and industrial processes. Oxygen and water is pumped

in seam which decomposes coal in above products and these are extracted through a well.



Same way, under l iquefaction coal under heat and pressure is converted in high value

petrochemical. However this is expensive process and only viable if prices of oil is high.

Government has made projects of underground coal gasification and liquefaction eligible to be

treated as captive for allocation of coal mines.

energy security coal

Documents