end of regions (friday fink)

26
The End of Regions? What new role for cities?: the recent case of England Kevin Richardson [email protected] www.slideshare.net/30088

Upload: 30088

Post on 01-Nov-2014

607 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: End of Regions (friday fink)

The End of Regions?

What new role for cities?:

the recent case of England

Kevin Richardson

[email protected]

www.slideshare.net/30088

Page 2: End of Regions (friday fink)

Regions?

Cities?

Page 3: End of Regions (friday fink)

Its not new

Its not only happening here in England

Its not a party political thing

Page 4: End of Regions (friday fink)

EU Context• EU Parliament / Committee of Regions; but what real

power in TFEU compared to Member States?

• Only very few examples of significant regional government (AU, DE, BE?); exceptions often based on identity (Scotland, Cataluña etc) Cities generally ignored.

• Few (if any) examples of genuine functioning regional economies

• Institutional capacity within Brussels to ‘manage’growing number and widening characteristics of regions?

Page 5: End of Regions (friday fink)

271 NUT2 Regions

Page 6: End of Regions (friday fink)

New ‘regions?’

Experiments with ‘macro’ and cross border ‘regions’

Page 7: End of Regions (friday fink)

Regions

in

England

Page 8: End of Regions (friday fink)

Bonfire of the Regions

May 2010 (Con / Liberal)

• Regional Development Agencies

• Regional Spatial Strategies (inc. housing &

transport)

• Regional offices of Central Government

• Regional Business Link (enterprise agencies)

• Regional Funding Allocations

• Regional Tourism Boards

• Nationalisation of Employment Programmes and

Inward Investment

• Nationalisation of all funding for technology and

regeneration, including European Social Fund

Page 9: End of Regions (friday fink)

History: Regional Governmentin England

• ‘14 – administrative / ‘military’ regions

• ’79 – (CON) neo-liberalism, end of spatial strategies

• ’94 – (CON) Government Offices for the Regions (GOs)

• ’97 onwards – (LAB), formal regional government for Scotland, N Ireland (& Wales?); and indirectly (unelected) Regional Assemblies & many new regional strategies & institutions (including RDAs) in England

• ’04 North East referendum farce (78% ‘No’; all 25 districts reject proposal for formal regional government, including Newcastle as a the Core City)

Page 10: End of Regions (friday fink)

OECD Review of Newcastle in the North East (2006)

• central government is the ‘dominant actor’ in regional development / no national spatial strategy for either regions orcities

• only a small number of central departments engaged in regional development / funds for regional economic development tiny when compared to other mainstream budgets

• sub national agencies with only very limited authority & autonomy

• existing artificial boundaries of institutions increasingly not reflective of functioning economic areas (at all levels of geography)

• “governance arrangements at a metropolitan or functional urban level make sense for issues such as housing, transport, economic development, culture, organisation of retail, environment, universities, and land use planning”

• (but) public identities rooted much more in parochialism

Page 11: End of Regions (friday fink)

Post 2004 Confusion

•Core Cities

•City-Regions

•Sub Regions

Ref. CURDS, Newcastle University

Page 12: End of Regions (friday fink)
Page 13: End of Regions (friday fink)
Page 14: End of Regions (friday fink)
Page 15: End of Regions (friday fink)

What new role for Cities?

Page 16: End of Regions (friday fink)

‘This will start initially by

focusing on the Core Cities and

their surrounding areas, with a

view to expanding to a broader

group and identifying issues

relevant to a wide range of

cities’

A (part-time)

Minister

for ‘cities’

Page 17: End of Regions (friday fink)

Informal partnerships?

What genuine political interest in hard administrative / boundary reform?

(at all levels)

Page 18: End of Regions (friday fink)

Understanding ‘trade offs’between supporting agglomeration and high speed rail (between cities) and (for now) local cost air travel

Tomaney at el (2011)

Evidence to House of Commons Transport Select Committee

Page 19: End of Regions (friday fink)

Cities

are

greener

Page 20: End of Regions (friday fink)

• Understanding the

real relationship

between the urban

core and

surrounding places

(polycentricity)

• Why facilitate travel

to work by car?

Page 21: End of Regions (friday fink)

Planning to build

the ‘urban core’

Page 22: End of Regions (friday fink)

Risk based investment

finance

favours cities

Page 23: End of Regions (friday fink)

SMART strategies for growth also dependent on cities (and their universities)

McCann and Ortega-Argilés(2011)

Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy

Page 24: End of Regions (friday fink)

Migrants are

attracted to

cities (and

vice versa)

Page 25: End of Regions (friday fink)

Does it Matter?

New Economic Geography tells us that growth and the market drives and is increasingly dependent on cities

(see Krugman et al)

Page 26: End of Regions (friday fink)

A false dichotomy

between national and local levels

(towards shared

design, management &

delivery)?

Or towards a contractual

relationship based

on evidence / results / rewards

Barca (2009)