encouraging truly osteopathic matriculants: the role of perceptions, communication and data...
TRANSCRIPT
Encouraging Truly Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants: Osteopathic Matriculants:
The Role of Perceptions, The Role of Perceptions, Communication and Data CollectionCommunication and Data Collection
Council of Osteopathic Medical Admissions Council of Osteopathic Medical Admissions OfficersOfficers
Society of Osteopathic Medical EducatorsSociety of Osteopathic Medical EducatorsJune 27-29, 2007June 27-29, 2007
Program OverviewProgram Overview
Identification of Admission Data:
Matriculants vs. Non-Matriculants(A Three Year + Analysis)
National (AACOM)Private (Western U/COMP)
State (OU-COM)
Discussion of Data and Implications for the Future
Program Overview Program Overview
Communication and Perceptions
National Communication (AACOM)Institutional & Constituent Communication
Western U/COMPOU-COM
Discussion and Implications for the Future
Program OverviewProgram Overview
Data Collection
The Benefits of Collaboration on
Data Collection
Discussion and Implications for the Future
Summary and Conclusion
Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)
EC 2002
Matriculants n=2963
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic MatriculantsEncouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants
Science GPA Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.36 3.52 3.43 24.5
Applicants N=6683
Science GPA
Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.24 3.46 3.35 23.9
Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)
EC 2003
Matriculants n=3223
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic MatriculantsEncouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants
Science GPA Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.36 3.54 3.45 24.6
Applicants N=7140
Science GPA
Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.24 3.47 3.36 23.7
Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)
EC 2004
Matriculants n=3536
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic MatriculantsEncouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants
Science GPA Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.33 3.53 3.43 24.7
Applicants N=7629
Science GPA
Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.22 3.46 3.35 24.0
Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)
EC 2005
Matriculants n=3804
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic MatriculantsEncouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants
Science GPA Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.36 3.54 3.44 25.0
Applicants N=8562
Science GPA
Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.23 3.48 3.36 24.0
Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)
EC 2006 (preliminary data)
Matriculants n=3929
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic MatriculantsEncouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants
Science GPA Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.37 3.55 3.45 25.3
Applicants N=9737
Science GPA
Non-Science GPA
Overall MCAT total
3.25 3.49 3.37 24.1
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsMatriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsWesternU/COMPWesternU/COMP
EC 2004
N = 423
Matriculants n=198
Science Non-Science Overall MCAT
3.40 3.57 3.48 26.4
Non-Matriculants n = 225
Science Non-Science Overall MCAT
3.45 3.59 3.52 26.3
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsMatriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsWesternU/COMPWesternU/COMP
EC 2005N = 550
Matriculants n=213Science Non-Science Overall MCAT3.41 3.50 3.45 26.6
Non-Matriculants n = 337Science Non-Science Overall MCAT3.47 3.56 3.57 27.7
24% to MD 29% to DO 25% deferred4% not attending medical school 18% no response*
*attending medical school
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsMatriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsWesternU/COMPWesternU/COMP
EC 2006N = 525
Matriculants n=218Science Non-Science Overall MCAT3.43 3.56 3.49 26.9
Non-Matriculants n = 307Science Non-Science Overall MCAT3.47 3.56 3.59 27.4
12% to MD 52% to DO 31% deferred, 5% not attending medical school
Matriculants vs. Non-Matriculants Matriculants vs. Non-Matriculants OU-COMOU-COM
EC 2004 N=180
Matriculants n=114
Science Non-Science Over-all MCAT
3.39 3.60 3.49 25.3
Non-Matriculants n=66
3.45 3.58 3.54 27.9
65% to MD 18% to DO 14% Deferred
3% - Not Attending Med School
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsMatriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsOU-COMOU-COM
EC 2005 N=148 Matriculants n=108Science Non-Science Over-All MCAT 3.45 3.66 3.54 24 Non-Matriculants n=40 3.54 3.73 3.63 27 59% to MD 17% to DO 22% Deferred 2% Not Attending Med School
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsMatriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsOU-COMOU-COM
EC 2006 N=161 Matriculants n=108Science Non-Science Over-All MCAT 3.47 3.64 3.55 24.6 Non-Matriculants n=53 3.56 3.72 3.63 27.3 75% to MD 13% to DO 8% Deferred 4% Not Attending Med School
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsMatriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsOU-COM/COMPOU-COM/COMP
Additional Observations & Characteristics
* Personal Essays; Primary & Secondary
* Letters of Recommendation From D.O.’s
* Perceived Osteopathic Orientation During Interviews
* D.O. vs M.D. shadowing experience
Non-Matriculant Survey – WesternU/COMPNon-Matriculant Survey – WesternU/COMP
• Students who declined or withdrew after acceptance were online surveyed
• All responses were voluntary and non-traceable to the respondent
• Office of Institutional Research gathers, analyzes, and reports the data
• Many respondents do not answer all questions• The Survey has evolved somewhat each year
Non-Matriculant Survey Data – WesternU/COMPNon-Matriculant Survey Data – WesternU/COMPDemographicsDemographics
2004 2005 2006
Response Rate 43% 12% 28%
Gender
Female 59% 54% 51%
Male 38% 46% 49%
Ethnicity
Caucasian/White 62% 66% 60%
Asian/Pacific Islander 28% 17% 21%
Other 8% 14% 7%
Non-Matriculant Survey Data – WesternU/COMPNon-Matriculant Survey Data – WesternU/COMPDemographicsDemographics
2004 2005 2006
Age
25 or younger 76% 73% 73%
26-30 13% 17% 20%
31 or older 5% 9% 7%
Self Reported GPA
less than 3.0 3% 3% 2%
3.0-3.5 48% 44% 29%
3.5-4.0 46% 54% 70%
Top Non-Matriculant ConcernsTop Non-Matriculant Concerns
2004 2005 2006
Campus perceptions
Area surrounding campus 49% 46% 74%
Attractiveness of campus 37% 39% 56%
Campus facilities (hospital, space, classrooms, labs) 30% 29% 30%
Lack of on-campus housing 32% 10% 17%
Safety concerns 29% 15% 26%
Top Non-Matriculant ConcernsTop Non-Matriculant Concerns
2004 2005 2006
Regional Issues
I prefer to live in another region 46% 56% 49%
Cost of Living in Region 34% 29% 45%
Academics and Costs
Prefer another curriculum 36% 37% 15%
Academic reputation 29% 29% 13%
Tuition Costs 25% 32% 30%
Interview and Application ExperiencesInterview and Application Experiences
Consistently from 2004-2006• 62% felt the Interview Day increased their interest in
WesternU
• 88% of students felt the application experience was as good as or better than other schools
Which school do you plan to attend?Which school do you plan to attend?
2004 2005 2006
Midwestern/Chicago 5% 2%
Touro Cal/NV 5% 10% 6%
A.T.Still Kirksville 4% 7%
Midwestern/Arizona 3% 5%
Michigan State 3% 2% 8%
New York 3%
Nova Southeastern 3%
Des Moines 19%
Kansas City 6%
Matriculant Data – EC 2006Matriculant Data – EC 2006
• Freshman students in the College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific were invited to respond to an online survey from August 24 through September 10, 2006 asking why they decided to enroll at WesternU.
• With 55 responses out of a class of 219 students, the response rate was 25.1%.
Reasons For COMP MatriculationReasons For COMP Matriculation
Educational OfferingsCurriculum 73%Philosophy of Teaching and Learning 53%Clinical Educational Training 49%Academic Reputation 35%
Regional Location Southern California
71%
Reasons for COMP MatriculationReasons for COMP Matriculation
Founding Principles
WesternU Philosophy of Humanism 62%
Admission Experience
Students Met Face to Face60%
Timing of WesternU Decision 47%
How Well Treated in Process 42%
Faculty Met Face to Face 40%
Matriculant Areas of ConcernMatriculant Areas of Concern
Location in Pomona16%
Costs of Tuition and Housing 16%
Appearance, Quality of Buildings 11%
Campus Safety 9%
Very similar to Non-Matriculants, but at much lower level and did not prevent acceptance
Matriculant Sources of InformationMatriculant Sources of Information
WesternU Website 67%Students I Communicated With 63%Non WesternU Websites (AACOM, etc) 50%Interview Day presentations 49%Interview Orientation Booklet 43%Information from tour guide 40%Faculty I Communicated With 32%WesternU Literature 21%Information from Staff 21%
Reasons Why Students Selected WesternU
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Reason
%
No.
Top 3 Reasons
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Reason
%
No.
DiscussionDiscussion
Matriculant vs. Non-Matriculant Data?
Inferences?
Thoughts?
Role of Perceptions & Role of Perceptions & CommunicationCommunication
Perceptions and Communication
OU-COM/COMP
Distinctiveness and Parity
Patient Centered
Primary Care
Full Scope Practice
Roles of Perceptions & Roles of Perceptions & CommunicationCommunication
OU-COM/COMP
Print Media
*Viewbook
*CORE Clinical Brochures
* Research & Clinical Review
*Today’s D.O.
Roles of Perceptions & Roles of Perceptions & CommunicationCommunication
OU-COM/COMP
Electronic Media
*Web Presence
*Electronic Newsletter
*Electronic Discussion Boards
Roles of Perceptions & Roles of Perceptions & CommunicationCommunication
OU-COM/COMP Personal Contact *Accessibility Student & Family Pre-Professional Advisors * Emphasis on Relationships Reflective of the Osteopathic Approach
Role of Perceptions & Role of Perceptions & CommunicationCommunication
External Constituents
National Association of Advisors for the Health Professions (NAAHP) * Print and Web Presence * “The Advisor” NAAHP Journal * National Meetings
Roles of Perception & Roles of Perception & CommunicationCommunication
External Constituents *North East Association of Advisors to the Health Professions (NEAAHP) *Central Association of Advisors for the Health Professions (CAAHP)
- Web Presence - Regional Meetings - GSA Co-Sponsored Meetings
Roles of Perceptions & Roles of Perceptions & CommunicationCommunication
External Constituents *Southeastern Association of Advisors for the Health Professions (SAAHP) *Western Association of Advisors for the Health Professions (WAAHP) - Web Presence - PreMedical Advisor’s Reference Manual - Regional Meetings
Roles of Perceptions & Roles of Perceptions & CommunicationCommunication
External Constituents
*Keepsake - A Guide for Minority
Science Students
*Newsweek Magazine –Hero M.D.
*ER/Gray’s Anatomy/House MD
Data Collection Data Collection
“I can’t have information I know would be of interest to someone and not share it.”
- Sanford Berman
(former head cataloger, Hennepin County
Library System)
Data Collection Data Collection
Opportunities for and from sharing data
*Common non-matriculating student survey administered thorough AACOMAS
*Standard reports comparing matriculants and non-matriculants
- individual college compared to all COMs
- individual college compared to cohort COMs
* Other ideas?
Data CollectionData Collection
• Collaboration and data collection can help identify institutional challenges and national challenges
• Collaboration and data collection and Complete data sets contribute to the body of knowledge necessary for quality evaluation and assessment
• Evaluation and assessment are integral to institutional advancement and the advancement of the profession
(Accreditation Teams like it too!)
Data CollectionData Collection
Questions & Discussion
Future Directions & Implications
SummarySummary
Matric & Non-Matric Data
Perceptions & Communication
Data Collection
Importance of Collaboration
Contact Information:Contact Information:
Susan Hansen, M.S. - Western U/COMPSusan Hansen, M.S. - Western U/[email protected]@westernu.edu
Thomas Levitan, M.Ed. – AACOMThomas Levitan, M.Ed. – [email protected]@aacom.org
John D. Schriner, Ph.D. - OU-COMJohn D. Schriner, Ph.D. - [email protected]@ohio.edu
Harold C. Thompson III, D.O. - OU-COMHarold C. Thompson III, D.O. - [email protected]@ohio.edu
Bart Yee, D.O. - Western U/COMPBart Yee, D.O. - Western U/[email protected]@westernu.edu
THANK YOU!!!THANK YOU!!!
We Appreciated Your Time and Attention
Have a Great Day!