employment impact assessment: pennsylvania confidential | march 2012

35
Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Upload: sharleen-malone

Post on 24-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania

confidential | March 2012

Page 2: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Eos: Energy Storage Solutions Provider

* One full cycle includes full charge, discharge and additional frequency regulation over the course of one full day.

Mission: Providing the utility and transportation industries with safe, reliable, low-cost energy and power storage

Eos AuroraGrid Product:

• 1MW/6MWH energy storage system for the electric grid (1 MW optimal power for 6 hours, with surge capability)

• Safe, non-toxic, stable, reliable, low capital and operating cost• Battery price for major orders: $1000/kW, $160/kWh• 30 year life, 10,000 full cycles* • First ever long-life rechargeable zinc-air battery• Scaling up battery prototypes (17kW/100 kWh units) for initial manufacturing in 2012 and

delivery of MW scale systems to first customers in 2013

Vehicle Product:

• 50kW/100kWh dual zinc-air and long-life lead-acid capable of >340 mile range for $12,000

Value Proposition:

• Cost competitive with incumbent technology: gas-fired turbines for additional generation capacity and gasoline powered vehicles

Customers: • Customer LOIs: >100 MW of product over 5 years• Eos Genesis Program for utility early adopters and strategic auto industry partners

2

Page 3: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

The Challenge: Adapting to the Future Grid• Energy demand growing — projected to grow globally by 36% from 2010 to 2035, including energy

efficiency increases 1

• Aging generating capacity needs to be replaced — by 2025, most coal-fired plants and by 2030, most nuclear plants, will need to be rebuilt or retired 2

• Need for new transmission and distribution — $180B of planned US transmission projects 3

• Infrastructure driven by peak demand — 25% of distribution and 10% of generation and transmission assets (worth multi hundreds B$) used less than 400 hours per year 4

• Growing renewable generation that is intermittent leads to grid instability and—in some cases—curtailment or negative pricing 5

31) IEA, 2010. 2) NERC, 2010. 3) Quanta, 2010. 4) EPRI, 2010. 5) CAISO, 2007.

Page 4: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

The Solution: Energy Storage

Energy Storage Usage Can:• Improve efficiency and profit of existing generating assets• Defer costly upgrades to transmission and distribution infrastructure• Avoid additional peak generating capacity investments• Increase adoption and profitability of renewable energy

4

Electricity is the world’s only supply

chain with NO storage

Page 5: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Energy Storage Benefits

End User Benefits• Time of Use (TOU) Energy management (arbitrage)• Demand charge reduction• Electricity supply reliability improvement (backup)• Electricity supply quality improvement

Grid/Utility Benefits• Electricity peak shifting (arbitrage)• Supply of flexible, distributable capacity • Ancillary services

✴ Load following✴ Frequency regulation✴ Voltage support

• Transmission congestion relief / upgrade deferral• Renewable energy integration support via supply

firming and time shift

5

Page 6: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Global Market: $500B

BCG:

Piper Jaffray:

Worldwide, the energy storage market is forecasted to grow over the next five years at a CAGR of:

Lux Research:

6

1) BCG, 2010, estimate 280 Euros. 2) PiperJaffray, “Energy Storage”, February 2009. 3) http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Smart-Grid-Energy-Storage-Market-to-Grow-397-Annually-Through-2013-1329898.htm 4) http://www.evworld.com/news.cfm?newsid=18336

$400B1

$600B2

40-55%3

$64B/year 4

Page 7: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

High Capital Cost Limitation

EPRI, Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options, 2010. 7

US Market Sizes of Different Energy Storage Applications based on the Estimated Present Value of their Benefits

At a Li-ion capital cost in the >$1000/kWh range there are only a few GW of demand

Pre

sen

t V

alu

e o

f En

erg

y S

tora

ge

Ap

plicati

on

Page 8: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Eos Low Capital Cost Opens Markets

8

US Market Sizes of Different Energy Storage Applications based on the Estimated Present Value of their Benefits

Pre

sen

t V

alu

e o

f En

erg

y S

tora

ge

Ap

plicati

on

EPRI, Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options, 2010.

Market opens up for solutions with Eos’ capital cost of $160/kWh

Page 9: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Eos Aurora Meets Key Requirements

Eos Aurora 1000|6000

Low Capital Cost $1000/kW initial price; $160/kWh

Large volume of energy and power

1 MW/6 MWh standard system size (made of 17KW/100KWh building blocks)

Long life-cycle Designed for > 10,000 true cycles* and 30 calendar years of operation

Quick response time Response time: Immediate

Safe to locate in urban load centers

Non toxic, environmentally benign and stable

Instantly deployable Delivered in a standard ISO 40’ shipping container

Low operating and maintenance costs

No periodic replacement of components (e.g., membranes, cells, battery packs) required

* One full cycle includes full charge, discharge and additional frequency regulation over the course of one full day. 9

Page 10: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Competition

• Peak load reduction via energy efficiency and demand response

• Capacity additions from gas peaking plants• New transmission and distribution spending• Other energy storage providers

10

Page 11: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Eos Superior to Gas Peaking Plants

* Chart Notes: Levelized Cost of Energy included cap. fix, and var. costs. Gas peaking cost estimate from Lazard, 2009, midpoint of est. range. Assump: 150MW facility, Capital cost $1,125/MW, Heat rate 10.5 MMBtu/MWh, Cap. factor 10%, Facility Life 35 years, Construction time 25 months. Eos: 2MW plant, 25% cap. factor (6hrs of energy production), Round-trip efficiency of 75%, Cap. cost for entire system with Eos battery $1.7/watt, O&M costs: $20,000/year for a 2MW/12MWh operating costs, Facility Life 30 years.

11

Eos utility scale energy storage systems can be cheaper than gas peaking plants when compared at realistic operating conditions

Page 12: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Current World Electric Energy Storage Capacity

Fraunhofer Institute. EPRI, Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options, 2010. 12

Today’s electricity energy storage isalmost exclusively pumped hydro

Sodium-Sulfur Battery316 MW

Lead-Acid Battery~35 MW

Nickel-Cadmium Battery27 MW

Flywheels<25 MW

Lithium-Ion Battery~20 MW

127,000 MWel

Over 99% of total storage capacity

Pumped Hydro

Compressed Air Energy Storage440 MW

Redox-Flow Battery<3 MW

Page 13: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

13

Eos Energy Storage vs. Competitors

Eos

Low capital cost/kWh

Large volume of energy storage capacity

Long life (high # of life-cycles)

Quick response time (milliseconds)

Safe (non-toxic, non combustible)

Flexible to locate (in cities)

Low O&M costs

In commercial production

Pumpe

d Hyd

roCAES

-Belo

w Gro

und

Advance

d Lea

d Acid

Lithium

Ion

Zinc B

romine

Vanad

ium Redox

Sodium

Sulfu

rLe

ad A

cid

= Good = Medium = Poor CAES

-Abov

e Gro

und

Page 14: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

GST: Low Cost per Unit Energy and PowerEos: Low Cost per Unit Energy and Power

14

Eos offers the lowest

capital cost solution for

energy storage for

utility transmission

and distributionsupport

Page 15: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

15

Levelized Cost of Peak Energy

For renewable

integration and

load shifting

applications,

Eos’ levelized

energy cost is

among the

lowest along

with pumped

hydro and

combined cycle

gas turbines

* Non-Eos data source: EPRI, Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options, 2010. Natural gas fuel cost range: $6.5 -8/MMBtu. Levelized cost of energy includes cap. fix, and var. costs. Gas peaking cost estimate from Lazard, 2009, midpoint of est. range; assumes: 150MW facility, Capital cost $1,125/MW, Heat rate 10.5 MMBtu/MWh, Cap. factor 10%, Facility Life 35 years, Construction time 25 months. Eos: 2MW plant, 25% cap. factor (6hrs of energy production), Roundtrip efficiency of 75%, Cap. cost for entire system with Eos battery $1.7/watt, O&M costs: $20,000/year for a 2MW/12MWh operating costs, Facility Life 30 years.

Page 16: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

EV Demand: The Context

• Demand drivers for hybrid, plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles: Oil price volatility Energy security Climate change

16

Page 17: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

EV Demand: The Context

• Transportation accounts for 2/3 of US oil consumption

US Transportation Databook, 2011

The Math (Mbd)US oil consumption: 18.7 (of which vehicles: 10.7)

Domestic production: 9

17

Widespread adoption of EVs could reduce oreliminate US oil import dependence

Page 18: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

18

Global EV Battery Opportunity: > $33B/yr. Global vehicle focused energy storage market estimate:

Lazard Capital Markets, Shrestha, Sanjay, Martin, Sarah and Zhang, Jenny (Lazard Capital Markets), “Alternative Energy & Infrastructure”, March 5, 2010

Market elasticity

high for low cost

(Eos) EVs: Would

you buy an EV if it

had the same

range and price

as an ICE vehicle?

• 2016: $16B • 2020: $33B

Page 19: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

EV Challenges

• High battery cost $1,000 to $1,200/kWh sale price to OEM’s today $250/kWh goal from US Advanced Battery Consortium

• Driving range too short 40-190 miles today vs goal of 350 miles

• Charge time too long 7 hours to charge 24kWh Nissan Leaf

• Safety

BCG, Batteries for Electric Cars, 2010.http://www.nissanusa.com/leaf-electric-car/faq/list/charging#/leaf-electric-car/faq/list/charging 19

Page 20: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Eos’ Electric Vehicle Strategic Partnerships

Potential EV Configurations:

* http://www.bcg.com/documents/file36615.pdf, pg. 5.

Eos Vista zinc-air flow battery

Eos Aurora zinc-air battery • >300 Mile driving

range• Same cost as ICE

vehicle• $0.02/mile fuel cost• Refuelable in

addition to rechargeable

• Lower cost per kWh

20

"These are magical distances. To buy a car that will cost $20,000 to $25,000 without a subsidy where you can go 350 miles is our goal."

- US Energy Secretary, Steven Chu

Page 21: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Other Eos Technologies Under Development

Eos Vista Zinc-Air Flow Battery

Eos Innovation:

• Based on Eos zinc-air technology • Allows decoupling of the power and energy of the battery for

more flexible configuration and lower cost per kWh• As battery discharges, the used electrolyte is stored and

replaced, and more zinc is added, allowing for battery operation to continue

Addressable Markets:

• Electric vehicles • Stationary power

Status: • Further design development required

21

Page 22: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

EVs: Battery Cost vs ICEs

Morgan Stanley, 2011

Eos Goal: 100-200 $/kWh

22

Page 23: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Gasoline Car vs Li-ion EV vs Eos EV

Toyota CamryEV with Li-ion(Nissan Leaf)*

EV with Eos Aurora Zinc-Air Battery

EV with EosVista Flow

Battery

Capital Cost of Car

$25,000 $33,000 $25,000 $25,000

Propulsion System

Internal Combustion Engine

24 kwh Li-ion battery

80 kw motor

Eos Zinc-Air battery, Eos lead

acid battery

Eos Zinc-Air Flow battery, Eos lead

acid battery

Range (miles) 400 75-100 340 400

Refueling Time

3 mins5-7 hrs with

220-240V charger6 hours 3 mins

Cost of fuel/mile at$4/gal gas

.20 .03 .02 .02

HP (peak) 179 hp 107 hp 175 hp 175 hp

*http://www.nissanusa.com/ev/media/pdf/specs/FeaturesAndSpecs.pdf 23

Page 24: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Innovation: First Ever Rechargeable Long-Life Zinc-Air Battery

1) Started with a safe, robust, well developed technology: Widely used today for hearing aids, medical equipment Electrolyte (ZnCl2): safe, widely used in toothpaste

(Triclosan)2) Innovated to resolve historic challenges that

prevented rechargeability 3) Designed product for ease of scale manufacturing

at competitive cost

24

Eos energy storage: “low-cost, rugged, long-life, non-toxic and compact design for stationary and mobile applications.”

- KEMA Energy Consultants

Page 25: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

confidential

What is a Zinc-Air Battery?

Zinc or Metal Air provides highest potential energy density for batteries

• Widely used today for high-energy density, low-cost, single use applications• e.g. hearing aids

• Based on similar chemistry used in standard alkaline AA and AAA batteries (Zn/MnO2)

• Replaces manganese dioxide (MnO2 ) with thin air electrode, saving space and cost • Air electrode contains carbon and catalysts, which absorb and catalyze oxygen to allow it

to react with zinc, eliminating need to contain cathode reactant in battery so most of battery can be filled by zinc anode, saving space

Energizer, Zinc Air Prismatic Handbook 25

Page 26: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Zinc-Air Advantages

• High energy density• Materials are safe, low cost, locally

sourced, readily available Zinc: • Cheap: One of the world’s most

plentiful and inexpensive metals • Non toxic• Locally available - three of top five

zinc producers: US, Canada and Australia

Air • Inexpensive to manufacture• Environmentally friendly

Other batteries need to hold a large amount of cathode reactant, equivalent to pulling a trailer full of gasoline oxidizer (air) behind your car. Zinc-air batteries have higher energy density since they—like gasoline engines—use ambient air as a reactant, and therefore don’t need to carry it in the cell, increasing energy density

Vs.

26

Page 27: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Expert Opinions of Eos

• SCE, Rittershausen J and McKonah, Moving Energy Storage from Concept to Reality, 2011. 27

“Metal air batteries… have the potential to be lower-power,long-duration energy storage devices…”

- SCE, 2011*

“ Eos has developed a number of improvements for the conventional zinc-air battery to become a viable secondary battery.”

- KEMA Energy Consultants

“(Eos’) novel non-flow design offers elegant approach to management of prior zinc-air issues.” - Electric Power

Research Institute

“Metal-air batteries contain high energy metals and literally breathe oxygen from the air, giving them the ability to store extreme amounts of energy.” - US Energy Secretary, Steven Chu

Page 28: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

IP Protection

• Obtained and applied for multi-layer patent protection on key intellectual property Cell configuration and architecture Cathode design, materials and catalysts Electrolyte and additives System configuration and electrolyte system

• Three major patents registered and pending in the US and abroad, and will be applying for at least one more

28

Page 29: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Over 400 MW of Planned Development

• Formed JV partnership with Plaza Construction and Fisher Brothers to co-develop 400 MW by 2020

• JV will build energy storage as merchant power plants both in load centers (behind the meter) and directly on the grid

29confidential

Page 30: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Potential Applications for Eos’ Storage Solution

End User Benefits• Time of Use (TOU) Energy management (arbitrage)• Demand charge reduction• Electricity supply reliability improvement (backup)• Electricity supply quality improvement

Grid/Utility Benefits• Electricity peak shifting (arbitrage)• Supply of flexible, distributable capacity • Ancillary services

✴ Load following✴ Frequency regulation✴ Voltage support

• Transmission congestion relief / upgrade deferral• Renewable energy integration support via supply

firming and time shift

30

a variety of overlapping revenue streams

Page 31: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

31confidential

MARKET/TECH

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Eos Aurora Grid Storage• Zn-Air

JV Pre-Dev.

R&D

Pilot tests

JV Site Prep

Manufacture PrototypeQ1

JV Deployment

Marketing and Sales

Scale Manuf.

Business Timeline

• Manufacturing commencing in Q1 2013• Scale manufacturing in 2013 / 2014 • Joint venture (JV) for project development launching in Q4

2011

Page 32: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Eos Energy StorageInvestment and Job Creation

Immediate• Establishment of corporate headquarters, laboratory and engineering center• Direct jobs: 42• Average salary: $80,000• Investment: $10M

2013-2020• Establishment of three production facilities each with a 300MW/year capacity• Direct jobs: 140/facility = 420 full time positions• Average salary: $45,000• Investment: $28M/facility = $84M• Indirect job creation:

Full time positions: 682 Total Indirect Labor $ Generated: $33,548,745

32confidential

Page 33: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Development Joint VentureInvestment and Job Creation

Immediate:• Establishment of corporate headquarters• Direct jobs: 25• Average salary: $100,000

2013-2020• Establishment of 400MW of energy storage facilities• Direct jobs: 366• Average salary: $80,000• Investment: $1.2 Billion• Indirect job creation: multiplier typical for NJ construction industry

33confidential

Page 34: Employment Impact Assessment: Pennsylvania confidential | March 2012

Summary• The Eos Aurora will be a safe, reliable, non-toxic, non-combustible, low cost zinc-air

energy storage system for the electric grid that can be sold for $1000/kW and $160/kWh, rechargeable over 10,000 cycles (30 years)

• Superior value proposition to incumbent technology: gas-fired turbines for additional generation capacity and gasoline engines for transportation

• Scaling up battery prototypes (100 kWh units) for initial manufacturing in 2012 and delivery of MW scale systems to first customers in 2013

• Development joint venture with Plaza Construction/Fisher Brothers will focus on developing energy storage as merchant power plants

• Over 1500 jobs created with investment of $1.3 Billion 2013-2020

• One full cycle includes full charge, discharge and additional frequency regulation over the course of one full day. 34