emissions effects of using b20 in the current transit … · this project focuses on determining...

1
2008 ISL DPF equipped: no PM sensitivity to fuel NOx emissions more sensitive to duty cycle than to fuel B20/ULSD showed statistically significant increase in NOx on all cycles (9%–12%) B20/CARB showed statistically significant increase in NOx on UDDS and MAN (9%–12%) 2010 ISL DPF equipped: no PM sensitivity to fuel SCR equipped: very low NOx emissions, near detection limits on some cycles Feedback NOx control: insensitive to biodiesel (verified with B100) LATE 2011 CUMMINS ISL WITH DPF/SCR SCR is highly effective at reducing NOx – emissions near detection on some cycles B20 demonstrated a statistically significant REDUCTION in NOx emissions on the Manhattan cycle Even B100 NOx emissions increase was eliminated – no statistically significant difference on either cycle PM emissions near zero on all fuels (DPF This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information NREL/PO-5400-55299 APPROACH VEHICLE SELECTION APTA 2009 Bus Fleet Survey data used to define target bus configurations for testing Buses tested: 1998 Neoplan w/DDC50 [pre exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)] 2005 Gillig w/Cummins ISM [aftermarket diesel particulate filter (DPF)] 2008 Gillig w/Cummins ISL (OEM DPF) 2008 Gillig Allison hybrid/Cummins ISL (OEM DPF) 2010 Gillig Cummins ISL [OEM DPF, selective catalytic reduction (SCR)] 2011 Gillig Cummins ISL (OEM DPF, SCR) CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER TESTING Selected buses were tested at NREL’s Renewable Fuels and Lubricants (ReFUEL) research laboratory. Testing was performed on a chassis dynamometer over multiple standard drive cycles to evaluate the effects of biodiesel fuel on vehicle exhaust emissions. The ReFUEL facility is available to members of the research community interested in testing advanced fuels, prototype engines, and hybrid powertrains for next generation vehicle technologies. TEST CYCLES Three test cycles were chosen to bracket real-world range of duty cycles Manhattan Bus Cycle (MAN) Orange County Transit Authority Cycle (OCTA) Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) FUELS Fuels used in the study: Ultralow sulfur diesel (ULSD) (cert fuel used for consistency) B20 with ULSD base Low-aromatic (California Air Resources Board [CARB]) diesel B20 with CARB base RESULTS 1998 DDC S50 The only technology showing PM sensitivity to fuel (no DPF) NOx emissions more sensitive to duty cycle than to fuel Lower intensity cycles showed statistically significant increase in NOx emissions of 3%–5% with B20/CARB 2008 ALLISON HYBRID/ISL Only tested on Cert and Cert B20 (CARB fuel effect already documented) No statistically significant effect from B20 fuel PM emissions near zero on both fuels (DPF) Drive cycle influence on NOx emissions greater than with non-hybrid drive trains 2005 ISM DPF-equipped: no PM sensitivity to fuel NOx emissions more sensitive to duty cycle than to fuel Lower intensity cycles showed statistically significant increase in NOx emissions of 3%–5% with B20/CARB TECHNOLOGY COMPARISONS Engine certification level is most dominant effect on bus NOx emissions by far. Roughly 50% reduction obtained with each new cert level Duty cycle is second driving factor in bus NOx emissions (20%–25%) Fuel choice has least effect on bus NOx emissions (0%–12%) B20 effect on NOx emissions statistically significant in fewer than half of comparisons Hybrid increase in NOx emissions has been documented before. Likely culprits are engine efficiency management strategies This project focuses on determining the emissions impact of using 20% blends of biodiesel fuel (B20) in regional transit buses representative of current fleets in the United States. OBJECTIVE Class 8 Vehicle on Dyno Photo by NREL PIX: 13284 U.S. Department of Energy Dennis Smith, National Clean Cities Director Regional Transportation District Lou Ha Roaring Fork Transportation Authority Dan Blankenship Kenny Osier Use of biodiesel is being pursued with the intent of reducing the dependence of the United States on imported oil and to reduce emissions of fossil-fuel-based carbon compounds Regional transit operations, which are typically subsidized by federal funding, are concerned about liability for possible increased NOx emissions if they use B20 The project was intended to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of B20 on NOx emissions in the current fleet of transit buses, which use a wide range of emission control technologies This is one of several projects conducted by NREL to support the Clean Cities program goal of reducing petroleum consumption in transportation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS RELEVANCE Base Fuels Properties Cert CARB Cetane Number 42.5 48.7 Total Aromatics, % vol 29 8.5 15 10 5 0 MAN OCTA UDDS NOx Emissions (g/mile) Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle 2008 Cummins ISL NOx emissions with 95% condence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each Cert Cert B20 Low Arom Low Arom B20 25 20 15 10 5 0 MAN OCTA UDDS NOx Emissions (g/mile) Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle 2005 Cummins ISM NOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each Cert Cert B20 Low Arom Low Arom B20 50 40 30 20 10 0 MAN OCTA UDDS NOx Emissions (g/mile) Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle 1998 Detroit Series 50 NOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each Cert Cert B20 Low Arom Low Arom B20 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MAN OCTA UDDS NOx Emissions (g/mile) Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle 2008 Allison Hybrid Cummins ISL NOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each Cert Cert B20 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 MAN OCTA UDDS NOx Emissions (g/mile) Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle 2010 Cummins ISL NOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each Cert Cert B20 Low Arom Low Arom B20 B100 50 40 30 20 10 0 1998 2005 2008 2008 Hybrid 2010 NOx Emissions (g/mile) Bus Engine Build Year Manhattan Cycle NOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each Cert Cert B20 Low Arom Low Arom B20 2011 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2010 2011 10 8 6 4 2 0 MAN OCTA UDDS PM Emissions (g/mile) Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle 1998 Detroit Series 50 PM emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each Cert Cert B20 Low Arom Low Arom B20 2008 Gillig/Allison (HEV) Photo by Jon Cosgrove, NREL 2010 Gillig Photo by Scott Walters, NREL 2011 Gillig Photo by Scott Walters, NREL 2008 Gillig Photo by Matthew Thornton, NREL 2005 Gillig Photo by Scott Walters, NREL 1998 Neoplan Photo by Scott Walters, NREL 50 30 40 10 20 0 500 1500 Speed (mph) Time (s) 0 1000 OCTA 70 50 60 20 10 30 40 0 200 600 800 1000 Speed (mph) Time (s) 0 400 UDDS 30 20 25 5 10 15 0 200 600 800 1000 Speed (mph) Time (s) 0 400 MAN US Diesel Transit Bus Population Breakdown 120% 100% 60% 80% 20% 40% 0 1995 2000 2010 Percent of Population Bus Model Year 1990 2005 % Cummins % DD % Hybrid % Acve Dyno Capabilities 8,000 – 80,000 lb (Class 3 – 8) Tandem 40” rolls (adjustable wheelbase) 380-hp DC motor Features Programmable driver’s aid Electrical / mechanical inertia simulation Augmented braking Grade simulation Automated warm-up and coast- downs Metered, conditioned intake and dilution air Altitude simulation (sea level to mile high) Flexible full-scale constant- volume-sampler system Data Acquisition Emissions: regulated emissions measurement Fuel economy: fuel flow metering, gravimetric and carbon balance Analog channels for thermocouples, etc. Controller Area Network (CAN) bus integration for engine parameters Gravimetric particulate matter (PM) measurement Decreasing work and fuel consumption per mile mph stops/mile kinetic intensity MAN OCTA UDDS 6.8 12.3 18 9.7 4.7 2.5 5.7 2.2 0.4 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 MAN UDDS NOx Emissions (g/mile) Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle 2011 Cummins ISL NOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; Final 3 dyno runs each of 8 or 9 total Cert Cert B20 B100 Results to date show that using B20/ULSD has little or no effect on NOx emissions in buses without NOx emissions control, but using B20/CARB in such buses has a significant effect. In buses with NOx emissions control, however, using B20 (or even B100) has no effect on NOx emissions. NREL is a national laboratory of the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Transit Bus Population by Emissions Model Year Year % of Active Cummins Detroit Hybrid ‘98-’01 39% 19% 19% 0% ‘02-’06 44% 24% 15% 3.8% ‘07-’08 17% 14% 1% 3.5% Emissions Effects of Using B20 in the Current Transit Bus Fleet Matthew Thornton, Mike Lammert, Petr Sindler, and Robert McCormick – National Renewable Energy Laboratory EPA International Emission Inventory Conference | August 13-16, 2012

Upload: vanduong

Post on 03-Sep-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Emissions Effects of Using B20 in the Current Transit … · This project focuses on determining the emissions impact of using 20% blends of biodiesel fuel (B20) in regional transit

2008 ISL• DPF equipped: no PM sensitivity to fuel

• NOx emissions more sensitive to duty cycle than to fuel

• B20/ULSD showed statistically significant increase in NOx on all cycles (9%–12%)

• B20/CARB showed statistically significant increase in NOx on UDDS and MAN (9%–12%)

2010 ISL• DPF equipped: no PM sensitivity to fuel

• SCR equipped: very low NOx emissions, near detection limits on some cycles

• Feedback NOx control: insensitive to biodiesel (verified with B100)

LATE 2011 CUMMINS ISL WITH DPF/SCR• SCR is highly effective at reducing NOx –

emissions near detection on some cycles

• B20 demonstrated a statistically significant REDUCTION in NOx emissions on the Manhattan cycle

• Even B100 NOx emissions increase was eliminated – no statistically significant difference on either cycle

• PM emissions near zero on all fuels (DPF

This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted informationNREL/PO-5400-55299

APPROACHVEHICLE SELECTIONAPTA 2009 Bus Fleet Survey data used to define target bus configurations for testing

Buses tested:

• 1998 Neoplan w/DDC50 [pre exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)]

• 2005 Gillig w/Cummins ISM [aftermarket diesel particulate filter (DPF)]

• 2008 Gillig w/Cummins ISL (OEM DPF)

• 2008 Gillig Allison hybrid/Cummins ISL (OEM DPF)

• 2010 Gillig Cummins ISL [OEM DPF, selective catalytic reduction (SCR)]

• 2011 Gillig Cummins ISL (OEM DPF, SCR)

CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER TESTINGSelected buses were tested at NREL’s Renewable Fuels and Lubricants (ReFUEL) research laboratory. Testing was performed on a chassis dynamometer over multiple standard drive cycles to evaluate the effects of biodiesel fuel on vehicle exhaust emissions.

The ReFUEL facility is available to members of the research community interested in testing advanced fuels, prototype engines, and hybrid powertrains for next generation vehicle technologies.

TEST CYCLESThree test cycles were chosen to bracket real-world range of duty cycles

• Manhattan Bus Cycle (MAN)

• Orange County Transit Authority Cycle (OCTA)

• Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS)

FUELSFuels used in the study:

• Ultralow sulfur diesel (ULSD) (cert fuel used for consistency)

• B20 with ULSD base

• Low-aromatic (California Air Resources Board [CARB]) diesel

• B20 with CARB base

RESULTS

1998 DDC S50• The only technology showing PM sensitivity to fuel (no DPF)

• NOx emissions more sensitive to duty cycle than to fuel

• Lower intensity cycles showed statistically significant increase in NOx emissions of 3%–5% with B20/CARB

2008 ALLISON HYBRID/ISL• Only tested on Cert and Cert B20 (CARB

fuel effect already documented)

• No statistically significant effect from B20 fuel

• PM emissions near zero on both fuels (DPF)

• Drive cycle influence on NOx emissions greater than with non-hybrid drive trains

2005 ISM• DPF-equipped: no PM sensitivity to fuel

• NOx emissions more sensitive to duty cycle than to fuel

• Lower intensity cycles showed statistically significant increase in NOx emissions of 3%–5% with B20/CARB

TECHNOLOGY COMPARISONS• Engine certification level is most

dominant effect on bus NOx emissions by far. Roughly 50% reduction obtained with each new cert level

• Duty cycle is second driving factor in bus NOx emissions (20%–25%)

• Fuel choice has least effect on bus NOx emissions (0%–12%)

• B20 effect on NOx emissions statistically significant in fewer than half of comparisons

• Hybrid increase in NOx emissions has been documented before. Likely culprits are engine efficiency management strategies

This project focuses on determining the emissions impact of using 20% blends of biodiesel fuel (B20) in regional transit buses representative of current fleets in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

Class 8 Vehicle on Dyno

Phot

o by

NRE

L PI

X: 13

284

U.S. Department of Energy Dennis Smith, National Clean Cities Director

Regional Transportation District Lou Ha

Roaring Fork Transportation Authority Dan Blankenship Kenny Osier

• Use of biodiesel is being pursued with the intent of reducing the dependence of the United States on imported oil and to reduce emissions of fossil-fuel-based carbon compounds

• Regional transit operations, which are typically subsidized by federal funding, are concerned about liability for possible increased NOx emissions if they use B20

• The project was intended to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of B20 on NOx emissions in the current fleet of transit buses, which use a wide range of emission control technologies

• This is one of several projects conducted by NREL to support the Clean Cities program goal of reducing petroleum consumption in transportation

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

RELEVANCE

Base Fuels Properties Cert CARB

Cetane Number 42.5 48.7

Total Aromatics, % vol 29 8.5

15

10

5

0MAN OCTA UDDS

NO

x Em

issi

ons

(g/m

ile)

Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle

2008 Cummins ISLNOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each

Cert

Cert B20

Low Arom

Low Arom B20

25

20

15

10

5

0MAN OCTA UDDS

NO

x Em

issi

ons

(g/m

ile)

Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle

2005 Cummins ISMNOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each

Cert

Cert B20

Low Arom

Low Arom B20

50

40

30

20

10

0MAN OCTA UDDS

NO

x Em

issi

ons

(g/m

ile)

Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle

1998 Detroit Series 50NOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each

Cert

Cert B20

Low Arom

Low Arom B20

30

25

20

15

10

5

0MAN OCTA UDDS

NO

x Em

issi

ons

(g/m

ile)

Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle

2008 Allison Hybrid Cummins ISLNOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each

Cert

Cert B20

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0MAN OCTA UDDS

NO

x Em

issi

ons

(g/m

ile)

Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle

2010 Cummins ISLNOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each

Cert

Cert B20

Low Arom

Low Arom B20

B100

50

40

30

20

10

01998 2005 2008 2008 Hybrid 2010

NO

x Em

issi

ons

(g/m

ile)

Bus Engine Build Year

Manhattan CycleNOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each

Cert

Cert B20

Low Arom

Low Arom B20

2011

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.02010 2011

10

8

6

4

2

0MAN OCTA UDDS

PM E

mis

sion

s (g

/mile

)

Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle

1998 Detroit Series 50PM emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; 3 dyno runs each

Cert

Cert B20

Low Arom

Low Arom B20

2008 Gillig/Allison (HEV)

Phot

o by

Jon

Cosg

rove

, NRE

L

2010 Gillig

Phot

o by

Sco

tt W

alte

rs, N

REL

2011 Gillig

Phot

o by

Sco

tt W

alte

rs, N

REL

2008 Gillig

Phot

o by

Mat

thew

Tho

rnto

n, N

REL

2005 Gillig

Phot

o by

Sco

tt W

alte

rs, N

REL

1998 Neoplan

Phot

o by

Sco

tt W

alte

rs, N

REL

50

30

40

10

20

0500 1500

Spee

d (m

ph)

Time (s)0 1000

OCTA70

50

60

20

10

30

40

0200 600 800 1000

Spee

d (m

ph)

Time (s)0 400

UDDS

30

20

25

5

10

15

0200 600 800 1000

Spee

d (m

ph)

Time (s)0 400

MAN

US Diesel Transit Bus Population Breakdown

120%

100%

60%

80%

20%

40%

01995 2000 2010

Perc

ent o

f Pop

ulat

ion

Bus Model Year1990 2005

% Cummins

% DD

% Hybrid

% Active

Dyno Capabilities

• 8,000 – 80,000 lb (Class 3 – 8)

• Tandem 40” rolls (adjustable wheelbase)

• 380-hp DC motor

Features

• Programmable driver’s aid

• Electrical / mechanical inertia simulation

• Augmented braking

• Grade simulation

• Automated warm-up and coast-downs

• Metered, conditioned intake and dilution air

• Altitude simulation (sea level to mile high)

• Flexible full-scale constant-volume-sampler system

Data Acquisition

• Emissions: regulated emissions measurement

• Fuel economy: fuel flow metering, gravimetric and carbon balance

• Analog channels for thermocouples, etc.

• Controller Area Network (CAN) bus integration for engine parameters

• Gravimetric particulate matter (PM) measurement

Decreasing work and fuel consumption per mile

mphstops/mile

kinetic intensity

MAN OCTA UDDS6.8 12.3 189.7 4.7 2.55.7 2.2 0.4

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0MAN UDDS

NO

x Em

issi

ons

(g/m

ile)

Chassis Dynamometer Duty Cycle

2011 Cummins ISLNOx emissions with 95% confidence interval bars; Final 3 dyno runs each of 8 or 9 total

Cert

Cert B20

B100

Results to date show that using B20/ULSD has little or no effect on NOx emissions in buses without NOx emissions control, but using B20/CARB in such buses has a significant effect. In buses with NOx emissions control, however, using B20 (or even B100) has no effect on NOx emissions.

NREL is a national laboratory of the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency

and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Transit Bus Population by Emissions Model YearYear % of Active Cummins Detroit Hybrid

‘98-’01 39% 19% 19% 0%‘02-’06 44% 24% 15% 3.8%‘07-’08 17% 14% 1% 3.5%

Emissions Effects of Using B20 in the Current Transit Bus FleetMatthew Thornton, Mike Lammert, Petr Sindler, and

Robert McCormick – National Renewable Energy LaboratoryEPA International Emission Inventory Conference | August 13-16, 2012