emergency airway management · 2012. 3. 14. · emergency airway management is one of the most...

26
Emergency airway management Michele Blanda, MD, FACEP * , Ugo E. Gallo, MD, FACEP Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine and Summa Health System, 41 Arch Street, Room 519, Akron, OH 44304, USA Emergency airway management is one of the most crucial aspects in caring for critically ill patients. The patient’s rapidly evolving condition as well as the spectrum of acute airway disorders confronted in an emergency setting requires both knowledge and skill in all aspects of acute airway management. The need for intubation can be determined by assessing the integrity of the airway, the adequacy of oxygenation and ventilation, the ability to protect the airway, and the need for intubation based on the patient’s present condition or therapy required. This determination is dy- namic; the emergency physician should consider the need for intubation not only at the time of presentation but also in the management of the patient’s condition. Endotracheal intubation is used to establish, maintain, or protect an airway that is compromised or has a potential for compro- mise. In addition, it is used to improve pulmonary toilet and to enhance oxygenation and ventilation. It is the first choice for invasive airway management when simple positioning or bag valve mask ventilation is inadequate. Consideration of the patient’s airway in this context allows the emergency physician to anticipate and prepare for the difficult airway, thus avoiding a potential forced and hurried intubation. A standard definition for the difficult airway has not been identified. In this article, a difficult airway is defined as a clinical situation in which the practitioner experiences difficulty with ventilation, laryngoscopy, or tracheal intubation. There is strong evidence that specific strategies facilitate man- agement of the difficult airway. Although the exact degree of benefit cannot be determined, there is strong agreement that a preformulated strategy will lead to improved outcomes [1–4]. The strategy will depend in part upon the patient’s condition and the physician’s skills and preferences. Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26 * Corresponding author. Department of Emergency Medicine, Summa Health System, 41 Arch Street, Room 519, Akron, OH 44304. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Blanda). 0733-8627/03/$ - see front matter Ó 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0733-8627(02)00089-5

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Emergency airway management

    Michele Blanda, MD, FACEP*,Ugo E. Gallo, MD, FACEP

    Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine and Summa Health System,

    41 Arch Street, Room 519, Akron, OH 44304, USA

    Emergency airway management is one of the most crucial aspects incaring for critically ill patients. The patient’s rapidly evolving condition aswell as the spectrum of acute airway disorders confronted in an emergencysetting requires both knowledge and skill in all aspects of acute airwaymanagement. The need for intubation can be determined by assessingthe integrity of the airway, the adequacy of oxygenation and ventilation, theability to protect the airway, and the need for intubation based on thepatient’s present condition or therapy required. This determination is dy-namic; the emergency physician should consider the need for intubationnot only at the time of presentation but also in the management of thepatient’s condition. Endotracheal intubation is used to establish, maintain,or protect an airway that is compromised or has a potential for compro-mise. In addition, it is used to improve pulmonary toilet and to enhanceoxygenation and ventilation. It is the first choice for invasive airwaymanagement when simple positioning or bag valve mask ventilation isinadequate. Consideration of the patient’s airway in this context allows theemergency physician to anticipate and prepare for the difficult airway, thusavoiding a potential forced and hurried intubation.

    A standard definition for the difficult airway has not been identified. Inthis article, a difficult airway is defined as a clinical situation in which thepractitioner experiences difficulty with ventilation, laryngoscopy, or trachealintubation. There is strong evidence that specific strategies facilitate man-agement of the difficult airway. Although the exact degree of benefit cannotbe determined, there is strong agreement that a preformulated strategy willlead to improved outcomes [1–4]. The strategy will depend in part upon thepatient’s condition and the physician’s skills and preferences.

    Emerg Med Clin N Am

    21 (2003) 1–26

    * Corresponding author. Department of Emergency Medicine, Summa Health System,

    41 Arch Street, Room 519, Akron, OH 44304.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Blanda).

    0733-8627/03/$ - see front matter � 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/S0733-8627(02)00089-5

  • This article assumes the reader is knowledgeable and experienced inroutine endotracheal intubation techniques. It focuses on identificationand management of the difficult airway, including alternative noninvasivetechniques such as tactile intubation, directional tubes, stylets, combinationtubes, and the laryngeal mask airway. Invasive techniques discussed areretrograde intubation, needle cricothyrotomy, and surgical cricothyrotomy.Methods for intubation such as rapid sequence intubation and awakeintubation techniques are also reviewed.

    Difficult intubations

    The experienced clinician can usually anticipate when intubation may bedifficult (Box 1) [5]. This is determined by obtaining a directed airwayhistory and thorough physical exam. In many cases history and physicalexamination may be abbreviated because of emergent circumstances, butthey should not be omitted. This assessment is a reliable indicator of thepatient’s overall state of health and is useful in predicting potential dif-ficulties [3,5–7]. Occasionally, despite a thorough evaluation, a patient maypresent with an unexpected problem during intubation. At these times thepractitioner should depend on a preformulated plan of action.

    History

    The historical data obtained should be brief and include informationabout previous intubations with delineation of any problems, the presenceof dental appliances (bridges, fillings) or loose teeth, and the time of lastmeal, because this may influence the choice of pretreatment and paralysismedications.

    Medical disease history should be directed to determine if there iscongenital or acquired disease that may interfere with the mobility of thecervical spine, atlanto-occipital joint, mandible, or soft tissues of the oralcavity and neck; such diseases include arthritis (especially rheumatoid) andankylosing spondylitis. If nasotracheal intubation is contemplated, inquiriesabout clotting disturbances, nasal polyps, and a history of epistaxis shouldbe obtained.

    Physical exam

    A general assessment of the patient’s overall condition, especially the levelof consciousness and the ability to breathe should be performed. Examinationof the airway includes exam of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ),mandible, lips oral cavity, tongue, teeth, neck, and cervical spine. The nose,septum, and nasal pharynx should be included if nasotracheal intubation isbeing used or considered as a rescue technique in the breathing patient.

    2 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • The function of the TMJ is complex and involves articulation andmovement between the mandible and the cranium. There are two distinctmovements involved in opening the mouth, and each contributes ap-proximately 50% to the degree of opening of the mouth [8]. The first is ahinge-like movement of the condyle through the synovial cavity, and thesecond is the forward displacement of the condyle.

    Assessment of the TMJ is performed by having the patient open theirmouth widely (Fig. 1). The practitioner should listen and palpate for clicksand crepitus, both of which indicate joint dysfunction, and assess the widthof the opening. Normal adults are capable of inserting three fingers, held

    Box 1. Predisposing factors for difficult intubation

    Anatomic variationsShort, thick mandibleThick/fat ‘‘bull’’ neckNarrow mouth openingLarge tongueDental anomalies/protruding teethLimited range of motion of cervical spine

    Congenital abnormalitiesScoliosisMandibular hypoplasiaMaxillary hypoplasiaKlipper-Feil syndrome (decreased number of cervical

    vertebrae)Cleft lip/palate

    Disease statesTemporomandibular joint disorderDegenerative cervical spine disease/arthritisAnkylosing spondylitisInfection (retropharyngeal abscess, Ludwig’s angina)Airway edemaForeign objectsMalignancyPrevious tracheostomy

    TraumaFacialMandibularMaxillaryCervical

    3M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • vertically in the midline into their mouth, which corresponds to a maximummandibular opening of 50 to 60 mm [9]. This width is important becausethe depth of the McIntosh #3 laryngoscope blade (Hospital EquipmentsManufacturing Company, New Delhi, India) is 20 mm. If the mandibularopening is less than this, the McIntosh #3 laryngoscope blade cannot beinserted into the mouth, necessitating a technique different than orotrachealintubation.

    Mandible hypoplasia is frequently associated with difficult intubation.In a normal adult, the distance from the hyoid bone to the mandibularsymphysis is about three finger widths. If this measurement is two fingerwidths or less, the mandible is considered hypoplastic.

    The patient’s oral hygiene should be assessed; if dentures are present,they should be removed. In the pediatric population, an occasional foreignobject such as candy or chewing gum may be hidden in the recesses of theoral cavity. Cleft lip deformities may present problems during intubationbecause the laryngoscope blade tends to enter the cleft. Long, protrudingteeth may limit the size of the mouth opening and may be damaged duringintubation.

    Two features of the tongue that may impede the clinician’s ability to seethe airway are size and mobility. Occasionally, the tongue may be so largethat it obstructs the view of the uvula, the pillars, and even the soft palate.The Mallampati classification is commonly used in anesthesia to describethe oral opening (Fig. 2) [6]. If the tongue is fixed in a position by tumor orother disease state, the view of the airway may be compromised.

    The neck and cervical spine should be examined before intubation. In thetraumatic patient, one should presume there is a cervical spine injury whenattempting intubation. In the atraumatic patient, the general contour of theneck should be inspected. Obese patients with short, muscular, thick necks

    Fig. 1. Temporomandibular joint assessment.

    4 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • typically have a limited range of motion and are more difficult to intubate.Skin pigmentation changes may be secondary to recent radiotherapy, whichcan cause acute inflammatory changes, scarring, and fibrosis in the neckregion. Previous tracheostomy scars suggest tracheal stenosis and diffi-cult intubation. All neck masses warrant concern, especially if related to avascular injury, since the airway can be occluded without warning. Infec-tions such as a retropharyngeal abscess, or Ludwig’s angina can distort theanatomy to such a degree that there is soft tissue displacement of the trachea.

    Vocal quality and the presence of stridor also suggest airway com-promise. Lesions that are predominantly supraglottic are typically asso-ciated with inspiratory stridor, whereas subglottic lesions tend to cause bothinspiratory and expiratory stridor.

    Fig. 2. Mallampati classification to describe oral opening. (From McGill JW, Clinton JE.

    Tracheal intubation. In: Roberts JR, Hedges JR, editors. Clinical procedures in emergency

    medicine. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998. p. 15–44.)

    5M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • Mobility of the cervical spine is measured by flexion or extension. Theoptimal position for endotracheal intubation is flexion of the cervical spineand extension of the head at the atlanto-occipital joint. Flexion or extensiondeformities of the cervical spine associated with arthritides can make directlaryngoscopy more difficult, if not impossible.

    Suboptimal standard technique can also make a routine intubationdifficult [10]. The most common mistake made during intubation is‘‘cranking back’’ on the laryngoscope handle to lever the top of the bladeto provide better visibility. This maneuver may improve glottic visual-ization, however, it restricts the intubators’ ability to manipulate the tube bylimiting the size of the oral opening and it jeopardizes the teeth. Duringdirect laryngoscopy, damage to the teeth is usually caused by excessivepressure on the teeth. Lifting the laryngoscope and blade upward andforward both improves the glottic visibility and increases the oral opening,allowing more room for manipulating the endotracheal tube.

    Alternative noninvasive techniques

    Several modifications of the standard technique, as well as adjuncts andalternative techniques, have been reported to assist in difficult intubations(Box 2) [11,12]. Changing the laryngoscope blade from curved to straight orvice versa is a simple technique that may favorably affect the intubators’ability to see the glottis or manipulate the tube successfully. Straight (Miller)blades (Hospital Equipments Manufacturing Company, New Delhi, India)are narrow blades with a curved central canal. A patient may be easier tointubate with a straight blade if they have overriding teeth, a very floppyepiglottis, or a thick neck that is difficult to maneuver. Straight blades arebetter for intubating small children. The curved (McIntosh) blade has abroad, flat surface and a tall flange to enhance movement of the tongue.For adults, a McIntosh #3 or #4 or a Miller #2 blade is most useful.Occasionally a patient with a thick neck will require a Miller #3.

    Position of the patient is a simple maneuver that may aid visualization ofthe vocal cords. To establish this line of sight, there are three axis that mustbe obtained (Fig. 3) [13]. The first is the axis of the mouth to the posteriorpharynx, the second is a line running parallel to the posterior pharynx, andthird is the line of the larynx as it traverses into the trachea. At rest, none ofthese axes are completely aligned. To establish a clear line of sight, it isimportant to first flex the neck on the shoulders to align the posteriorpharynx and the larynx. Approximately 30� of flexion is necessary to achievethis alignment. It is useful to place towels or folded sheets under the occiputof the patient to assist in holding this position. Next, it is important toextend the head on the neck to approximate a line of sight from the mouth,with the line of the pharynx and with the now aligned larynx. This requiresapproximately 20� of extension, although more may be necessary dependingon the soft tissue of the posterior pharynx. This extension occurs at the

    6 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • atlanto-occipital joint and thus, the cause of difficulty if there is arthritis orcervical spine abnormalities. This final alignment is conducive to directvisualization of the vocal cords and is called the ‘‘intubating’’ or ‘‘sniffing’’position.

    Digital/tactile intubationDuring laryngoscopy, the only structure commonly seen is the epiglottis.

    A blind technique using anatomical landmarks is the digital or tactiletechnique. The endotracheal tube is passed blindly by sliding the end ofthe tube along the under surface of the epiglottis and through the glotticopening [13,14]. By palpating the epiglottis with the index and long fingers,the epiglottis can be picked up by the long finger and directed anteriorly.The tube is guided by the index finger under the epiglottis and into the

    Box 2. Invasive and noninvasive alternatives, modifications,and adjuncts

    Invasive techniquesTranslaryngeal guided or ‘‘retrograde’’ intubationFiberoptic endotracheal intubationPercutaneous transtracheal ventilation or needle

    cricothyrotomySurgical cricothyrotomyPercutaneous tracheostomySurgical tracheostomy

    Noninvasive techniquesChanging laryngoscope bladesEndotracheal tube styletMagill forcepsDirectional tip control tubesBlind orotracheal passage based on landmarksUse of an assistantSpecial laryngoscope bladesGuiding styletsLighted styletsTactile orotracheal intubationPharyngeotracheal lumen airwayEsophageal–tracheal combitube airwayLaryngeal mask airwayStandard nasotracheal intubationTactile nasotracheal intubation

    7M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • trachea. A stylet bent at a 90� angle 4 to 6 cm from the tip of the tube shouldbe used to assist in placement.

    Advantages of ‘‘tactile intubation’’ include rapidity (when experienced),no need for special equipment and no movement of the head and neck. Thelimitation to this technique is to be successful the patient must be deeplyunconscious or there may be injury to the intubator’s hand.

    Fig. 3. Head tilt axes. (From McGill JW, Clinton JE. Tracheal intubation. In: Roberts JR,

    Hedges JR, editors. Clinical procedures in emergency medicine. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: WB

    Saunders; 1998. p. 15–44.)

    8 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • Directional tubesEndotracheal tubes (Endotrol tubes�, Mallinckrodt, Hazelwood, MD)

    with directional tip controls allow the intubator to alter the distal curve ofthe tube as needed during insertion [14]. This avoids intubation delayscaused by having to readjust the tube curve. Magill forceps, while designedprimarily for assisting with nasotracheal intubation, may also be useful fordirecting a tube during attempted orotracheal intubation. This is a two-person technique with an assistant used to retract the laryngoscope with theintubators’ guidance. After adequate glottic exposure is attained by theassistant, the intubators manipulate the tube into the glottic opening usingthe Magill forceps.

    StyletsStylets are commonly used to ensure that the tube is rigid and to allow

    greater curvature of the tube for reaching the more ‘‘anteriorly’’ situatedlarynx. The rigid stylet should never extend beyond the tip of the tubebecause it may cause pharyngeal or laryngeal trauma. Passing a smallerguide through the glottis initially may facilitate tube insertion in cases wherethe glottic opening can be seen but endotracheal tube insertion is difficult(eg, glottic edema in a burn patient). Devices successfully used for thispurpose include suction catheters or tracheal tube exchangers over styletwires. In addition, there are specially designed stylets with distal directionalcontrol that assist in moving the tube into the tracheal opening.

    Lighted styletsA transillumination technique for blind orotracheal or nasotracheal

    intubation is the lighted stylet or ‘‘light wand’’ [15–18]. The light at the tipof the stylet is positioned within 0.5 cm of the end of the endotracheal tube.Using a 90� angle placed 4 to 6 cm from the end of the tube, the tube is guidedby observing the anterior neck for transillumination through the soft tissue. Abright red glow in the midline at the level of the larynx indicates properguidance of the tube. (Fig. 4) The tip of the tube is in the pyriform sinus if thebright red glow is off themidline. A dull diffuse glow represents passage of the

    Fig. 4. Lighted stylet tube placement.

    9M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • tube into the esophagus.An advantage of this technique is the lack of head andneck manipulation. This technique is limited by overhead lighting, whichcreates difficulty seeing the stylet light. Also, because it is a blind technique, itis not recommended in patients with anatomic abnormalities of the upperairway such as tumors, polyps and infections (epiglottitis).

    Esophageal–tracheal tubesInitially designed for prehospital care, these airways may provide

    adequate ventilation as a temporizing measure until a more secure airwaycan be obtained [19–21]. These combination tubes are currently part of theASA recommendation for a patient that cannot be intubated or ventilated.Esophageal obturator airway (EOA) tubes had been widely used by pre-hospital emergency medical personnel before the development of com-bination tubes. The EOA’s major limitation was that ventilation wasimpossible if there was tracheal placement.

    The Combitube (The Kendall Company, Mansfield, MA) is currently themore commonly used tube (Fig. 5). This airway device is a double lumenventilation tube with two cuffs, a small distal cuff and a larger proximalcuff. One tube has a sealed distal end with perforations located on the sidesbetween the cuffs. The other tube has an open distal end. If the tube passesblindly into the trachea, the tube with the open distal lumen is used for

    Fig. 5A. Esophageal and tracheal Combitube placement. For esophageal placement: (1) the

    blue port connects with fenestrations to indirectly ventilate the lungs; (2) ventilations through

    the blue port exit the Combitube through fenestrations just above the trachea; (3) the large latex

    cuff seals the pharynx and prevents ventilations from exiting; (4) the distal end of the

    Combitube has an opening, but is not used.

    10 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • ventilation as an endotracheal tube. If the tube passes into the esophagus,the shorter tube is used to ventilate the lungs similar to the EOA.

    The advantage of this device is that it avoids the problem of accidentaltracheal intubation and no ability to ventilate that may occur with an EOA.It may be helpful if there is massive bleeding or regurgitation. It requires nohead or neck movement and can be used on cervical spine injury patients.The disadvantage is a contraindication in patients under 16 years of age orless than 150 inches tall. The Combitube must be used in patients withoutan intact gag who are unconscious. Combination tubes are an acceptedalternative for rescue airway but are most often seen in patients from thefield. Familiarity with these devices is important to ensure proper use.

    Laryngeal mask airwayThe laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was approved for use in the United

    States in 1992. It was developed in the 1980s and was used in the UnitedKingdom in the latter portion of that decade. It serves as a bridge betweenendotracheal intubation and face mask ventilation [22]. This device consistsof a tube resembling an endotracheal tube with a distal mask structuredesigned to form a seal around the glottic structures in the hypopharynx. Itis placed in unconscious patients and traditionally has been used on patientsunder anesthesia. A blind technique is used to place the LMA using thethumb and index finger to advance the tube and mask horizontally over thehard palate until it reaches into the posterior pharynx. Here the mask movesvertically until resistance is met. The cuff is then inflated and breathing isassessed by normal excursion, breath sounds, and no evidence of extraneous

    Fig. 5B. For tracheal placement: (A) the clear port connects with the distal lumen and provides

    direct ventilation; (B) the distal end of the Combitube has an opening.

    11M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • sounds. Slow, controlled breaths work best to avoid leakage around the cuffand the appearance of ineffective placement and unnecessary removal.

    The LMA comes in multiple sizes ranging from 1 to 5. Sizes 1 and 2 (withhalf sizes) are recommended for children, Generally size 4 is used fornormal-sized adults and size 5 is used for adults weighing more than 70 kg.Both a disposable and reusable LMA are available. In addition, an intu-bating LMA permits intubation through the device itself using a specificallydesigned endotracheal (ET) tube.

    The LMA is an excellent replacement for face mask ventilation. It doesnot replace the endotracheal tube largely because of the risk of aspiration.In addition, laryngospasm and inability to ventilate can still occur [23].Inability to ventilate can occur because of glottic rigidity or any soft tissueobstruction above the level of the glottis. Experience with this device inemergency airway situations is limited at present, but it may offer anothertemporary measure until a more secure airway can be obtained.

    Nasotracheal intubationAwake, blind nasotracheal intubation is different from endotracheal

    intubation because it requires a breathing patient. The nasal procedure issomewhat more difficult, is more time-consuming, and has a lower successrate than the orotracheal route [24,25].

    Indications for nasotracheal intubation include dyspneic patients inwhom the supine position is impossible or contraindicated and in whom theoral cavity is not accessible to orotracheal intubation. Examples of thisare wired jaws, anatomical problems (eg, a small mouth), TMJ arthritis,trismus, tetanus, intraoral infections, active seizures, obstructing lesions ofthe anterior oropharynx (eg, tumors), Ludwig’s angina, lingular swelling/hematoma, or dental abscesses. Other indications are unsuccessful oro-tracheal intubation despite multiple attempts or patients in whom para-lyzing agents are contraindicated.

    The tube for nasotracheal intubation should be approximately 1 mmsmaller in diameter than the tube used for orotracheal intubation. It shouldbe made of clear polyvinylchloride to allow breath condensation to be seenon the inside walls of the tube. Directional tubes are preferred.

    There are three anesthetic techniques that may be helpful in nasotrachealintubation: nasal, pharyngeal and translaryngeal. Nasal anesthesia is ob-tained using either topical viscous lidocaine (2% to 4%) and phenylephrine(1%) or cetacaine solution and phenylephrine (1%) or cocaine solution 2% to10% [26]. One to two milliliters of solution in each nares should be sufficientand can be applied with cotton swabs, pledgets, or spray. These combinationsallow both anesthesia and vasoconstriction. Cocaine is the only topicalanesthetic agent that provides both vasoconstriction and anesthesia.Lidocaine and cetacaine anesthesia require approximately 60 seconds foronset, whereas cocaine takes 5 minutes [25]. Hypertension is a relativecontraindication to the use of both cocaine and phenylephrine [27].

    12 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • Pharyngeal anesthesia is performed by spraying lidocaine or cetacaine tothe posterior pharynx. It is controversial whether pharyngeal anesthesiapredisposes patients to aspiration [28]. Translaryngeal anesthesia is notgenerally used in emergency medicine because it is unnecessary, time-consuming, and has complications [28].

    Blind nasotracheal intubation is performed with the patient supine orsitting in the ‘‘sniffing’’ position. The patient, if conscious, should receivestep-by-step instructions before and during the procedure. Lack of properpsychological preparation will lead to fear, anxiety, movement, and lack ofcooperation. The edge of the tube is placed against the nasal septum of thechosen nostril, to prevent abrasions and bleeding, and the tube is directedperpendicular to the facial plane with the curvature of the tube facingsuperiorly. The tube is then inserted through the nasal passage and into thepharynx by using a continuous forward pressure. If difficulty with passageoccurs, one can try a smaller tube or use the other nostril. Once the tubeis in the pharynx, it should be rotated 180� so that the curvature facesinferiorly. The tube now serves as a nasal airway and facilitates the re-mainder of the procedure. If the tube impedes on the posterior pharyngealwall, redirection by traction on the ring of the directional tube will over-come this obstacle.

    Upon advancing the tube forward approximately 2.5 to 5.0 cm, theoperator will note air movement passing through the tube. As the intubatorappreciates airflow, an assistant should apply gentle but firm pressure on thecricoid cartilage (the Selek maneuver). The patient should be instructed tobreathe in and out, and during inspiration the tube is advanced beyond thevocal cords. Balloon inflation and tube confirmation is performed usingstandard techniques.

    The nasotracheal tube can lie in only one of five locations outside thetrachea: (1) the vocal cords outside the larynx, (2) the vallecula, (3) the leftpyriform fossa, (4) the right pyriform fossa, or (5) the esophagus. Amisdirected tube at the vocal cords outside the larynx results in obstructionto passage of the tube despite good detection of breath sounds and can becorrected by gentle rotation. A tube that impacts the vallecula will oftencause a midline supralaryngeal bulge in the neck. Retracting the tube a fewcentimeters, followed by gentle pressure in the area just above the larynx, orby slight flexion of the head, will solve this problem. Misdirection of thetube into either the left or right pyriform fossae will often result in acorresponding lateral bulge in the neck. This problem is corrected by (1)displacing the patient’s larynx slightly in the direction of the bulge, (2)rotating the tube, (3) moving the head toward the side of the displacement,or (4) by any combination of these maneuvers.

    There is debate concerning the desirability of oral versus nasotracheaintubation for patients in whom a prolonged intubation is expected.Nasal airways are better tolerated by patients, but they carry the risk ofturbinate necrosis and sinusitis with prolonged use [24]. Relative

    13M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • contraindications to performance of nasotracheal intubation includesevere nasal or oral hematomas or hemorrhage, infections or hemato-mas of the upper neck, maxillary facial trauma, blood clotting abnor-malities, nasopharyngeal obstruction (deviated septum, masses) and acuteepiglottitis.

    Apnea or near apnea is an absolute contraindication only in use ofthe standard blind technique. However, use of the lighted stylet fiberopticendoscope, or tactile technique has been reported to aid in nasotrachealintubation in the apneic patient [26,29–31]. This technique has not beenreported outside the anesthesia literature. Also, even with vasoconstrictionand gentle tube manipulation, problematic epistaxis can occur [24,32,33].

    Invasive airway management

    Translaryngeal guided (‘‘retrograde’’) intubationRetrograde tracheal intubation is an effective emergency technique for

    securing an airway should conventional means of endotracheal intubationfail. Nevertheless, this technique has not yet gained wide clinical acceptance.This may be because of its invasive nature and the potential difficultyassociated with cricothyroid puncture; in addition, it is rarely taught in theclinical setting [34]. Retrotracheal intubation requires minimal operatorexperience and can be performed without head or neck movement [35,36].

    Use of retrograde intubation is indicated in a clinical setting in which analternative technique is desired because of bleeding, secretions, or vomitus inthe upper airway that obscures glottic visualization and there is inabilityto orally or nasally intubate using standard techniques. It is an alterna-tive to surgical cricothyrotomy [34,35,37]. Stable, cooperative patients, andcomatose patients with free access to the posterior pharynx and spontaneousrespiratory efforts are the most suitable candidates. Retrograde trachealintubation may not be suitable for patients requiring immediate intubationand ventilation, since the procedure can be expected to take up to 5 minutesfor completion [38].

    Cases have been reported in which retrograde intubation has provedeffective in patients with abnormal anatomical or pathologic conditionsof the upper airway, including congenital orofacial lesions, tumors, andinfections such as acute epiglottitis. Retrograde tracheal intubation has alsobeen useful in patients with other conditions limiting visualization of theglottis such as cervical spondylosis, trauma, or severe kyphosis. Patientssustaining severe orofacial trauma, in whom distortion of normal anatomyand a blood field precludes convention endotracheal intubation, are con-sidered candidates as well [39–42].

    Preparation for retrograde intubation includes preoxygenation and localanesthesia. Oxygen should be provided through a face mask. Use of retro-grade tracheal intubation allows unimpeded upper airway managementup to the point of retrieval of the guide catheter/wire from the posterior

    14 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • pharynx. Bag mask ventilation may also be added if spontaneous respi-rations are deemed inadequate

    After preoxygenation of the patient and equipment preparation, theposterior pharynx is sprayed with a topical anesthetic. A sterile technique isadvisable if time permits. One milliliter of 1% lidocaine is injected into theskin overlying the cricothyroid membrane, and another 2 ml is injected intothe glottic space and supraglottic lumen. In the conscious patient, careshould be taken to remove the needle quickly after this maneuver to avoidinjury from subsequent coughing.

    Retrograde intubation is performed using a 16- to 18-gauge needle placedin the cricothyroid membrane, directing the needle at 30� to 40� anglecephalad. When positioning the needle, it should be connected to a syringefilled with saline, and the bevel of the needle should be aligned with the scalemarked on the barrel of the syringe. This allows direction of the bevelcephalad once inside the larynx. The syringe can then be aspirated as it isbeing inserted to ensure that the needle tip has entered the laryngotracheallumen (Fig. 6). A small stab incision with a #11 surgical blade may facilitateentrance of the needle to the skin.

    A through-the-needle catheter or, preferably, a soft-tipped guide wire isthen passed retrograde from the larynx to the oral cavity where it isretrieved. The guide wire needs to be long enough to pass out of the mouth.A 100-cm wire is recommended to allow manipulation of the tube or use ofadjunct equipment. The needle is removed and the guide wire is secured atthe skin over the cricothyroid membrane with a hemostat.

    The endotracheal tube is placed over the guide wire at the proximal endof the wire (near the oral cavity). The wire is threaded into the distal sidehole (Murphy’s eye) and out the proximal end of the tube (Fig. 7) [43]. Thetube is then passed along the guide wire into the larynx while the guide isheld taut. Mild to moderate pressure must be held on the ET tube toadvance it into the trachea. The wire is withdrawn from the mouth in aretrograde direction to prevent contamination of cervical soft tissues at the

    Fig. 6. Confirmation of placement in the laryngotracheal lumen.

    15M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • puncture site. It is important that the motion of pulling the wire and theadvancement of the tube occur simultaneously; in addition, this maneuverrequires both hands and pressure. This is to ensure that when the guide isreleased the tube will move down through the larynx and into the tracheaand not fall back into the hypopharynx. The advancing beveled edge of theendotracheal tube may strike against the vocal cords; if this occurs, use offorce to move the tube through the glottis must be avoided. Rather, usesimple counterclockwise rotation of the endotracheal tube 90� to bringMurphy’s eye anterior and align the bevel perpendicular to the glottis slits,which allows the tube to pass [40].

    Modifications of this technique have been described using a plastic sheathprotector, a Cook exchange catheter, or a flexible stylet through the ET tubeinto the distal trachea just before releasing the guide wire [34]. This may helpprevent the ET tube from falling back into the hypopharynx.

    An absolute contraindication to this procedure is complete upper airwayobstruction. Other relative contraindications include severe trauma to thelarynx or laryngotracheal separation, the presence of an enlarged thyroidgland, soft tissue infection or abscess over the cricothyroid area, co-agulopathy, and inability to open the mouth for catheter retrieval. Themajor limitation of this technique is that if the endotracheal tube falls intothe hypopharynx at guide release, the procedure must be repeated.

    Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation or needle cricothyrotomyPercutaneous transtracheal ventilation or needle cricothyrotomy can be

    used as a temporizing measure when oral or nasal intubation is not possible.It is not recommended if there is complete airway obstruction, although thishas been recently debated if a large catheter is used.

    The technique is similar to the retrograde technique. The cricothyroidmembrane is identified, and a 12- to 16-gauge over-the-needle catheter that

    Fig. 7. Endotracheal tube guidewire threading.

    16 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • is attached to a saline-filled syringe is inserted at a 30� to 45� angle caudally.Unlike the retrograde technique, it is not directed toward the head becauseno wire has to be directed to the oral cavity. The catheter is threaded intothe hub. The catheter tip is then connected to a pressurized oxygen ap-paratus capable of delivering approximately 50 psi of oxygen. One-secondinflations are provided at a rate of approximately 12 per minute. If a high-pressure oxygen source is not available, another alternative is to attemptto use a bag-valve apparatus connected to the catheter. The proximal con-nector of an 8.0 ET tube will fit tightly inside a 3-cc syringe, which could beconnected to the catheter. In addition, the proximal connector of a 3.0 ETtube will fit into a catheter hub.

    An alternative to this technique is to use a Seldinger catheter introducerset, such as an 8.5-Fr introducer kit commonly used for pulmonary arterycatheters. The needle can be used to make the initial puncture and theguidewire inserted securely into the distal trachea. The catheter is theninserted over the wire using the dilator. The 8.5-Fr catheters have beenshown to provide some exhalation and have been used successfully inmodels of complete airway obstruction.

    It is most important to remember that this is a temporary procedure untila more secure airway can be attained. In addition, its effect is limitedbecause oxygenation can only be maintained for about 30 minutes becauseof the lack of adequate ventilation and progressive hypercapnia.

    Surgical cricothyrotomyThere are few situations in emergency medicine that inspire more concern

    than an airway that needs to be managed surgically. The incidence is low andthe acquisition of the necessary skill is difficult. Even when a clinical situationrequires a surgical airway, there is often a psychological reluctance toattempt the procedure. This tends to make the procedure even more diffi-cult because delay only places greater time constraints on the emergencyphysician to achieve a successful airway. The only mandatory indication fora surgical airway is total upper airway obstruction. The most commonreason is failure to achieve intubation by nonsurgical means. The emergencyphysician is usually more familiar and comfortable with alternative forms ofairway management, and often persists in attempts to achieve oral or nasalintubation, when in fact the patient needs a surgical airway.

    Surgical cricothyrotomy is indicated in the setting of severe maxillofacialtrauma preventing oral intubation, known unstable cervical spine fracture,laryngotracheal trauma except for tracheal transection, complete upperairway obstruction oropharyngeal obstruction or inability to secure theairway by other intubation techniques. It is contraindicated in pediatric pa-tients less than 12 years old or if there is laryngotracheal separation ortracheal transection. The latter contraindication is because the transectedairway may be tenuously held together by the cervical fascia. An incisiondividing the fascia will cause the distal stump of the trachea to retract into

    17M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • the mediastinum with disastrous consequences for the patient. If anendotracheal tube cannot be passed across the separation to act as a stent,a tracheostomy is the preferred surgical approach. Penetrating trauma tothe neck in either high Zone 2 or Zone 3 associated with an expandinghematoma is also a contraindication.

    Surgical cricothyroidotomy is performed by first locating the cricothyroidmembrane. The easiest way to remember this technique is to break it intofour steps: palpation, incision, insertion and intubation. The larynx ispalpated and stabilized by bracing the laryngeal cartilage with the thumband middle finger. The position of the cricothyroid membrane is maintainedwith the index finger (Fig. 8). A skin incision is then made and can bea midline, vertical incision (3–4 cm) or a horizontal incision over the cri-cothyroid membrane. An incision is then made through the cricothyroidmembrane just above the cricoid cartilage. A Trousseau dilator, trachealhook, hemostat, or blade handle should be immediately inserted in theopening. A tracheostomy tube (a #4 is appropriate for an average adult) oran endotracheal tube (6.0 mm is adequate for an average adult) should beinserted to secure the airway. It is very important not to lose control of theopening that has been made.

    A rapid, four-step cricothyrotomy technique has been described in theliterature [44]. In this technique, the skin incision is made horizontally atthe same time the incision is made through the cricoid membrane. Thistechnique, however, has been reported to have an increased incidence ofcricoid cartilage fracture [45].

    It is important to remember that cricothyrotomy is an emergencyprocedure, which is guided by palpation of the anatomy. When indicated, itmust be performed rapidly and it can usually be completed in less than 30seconds. It is a procedure guided by touch, not sight. The time required todissect the neck tissues adequately to see the cricothyroid membrane wouldlikely require several minutes; such a time delay would almost certainly bedetrimental to the patient.

    Fig. 8. Position maintenance of cricothyroid membrane.

    18 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • This technique has limitations in severe laryngotracheal trauma, cervicalhematoma, or swelling of the neck, which can make performance of it verydifficult. In addition, cricothyrotomy is useless in complete trachealtransection or tracheal foreign body.

    Rapid sequence intubation

    Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) involves the use of neuromuscularblocking agents and sedatives or hypnotic agents to facilitate intubation andlimit the potential adverse effects of laryngoscopy and intubation [34,46,47].It also allows the patient to be intubated without experiencing the phy-siological trauma of being intubated while conscious. Rapid sequence in-tubations are now considered routine in most emergency departments,accounting for 70% to 84% of all emergency department intubations [4,48].The use of pharmacologic agents to assist intubations seems to decreasecomplications. Comparisons of paralytic assisted and nonparalytic assistedintubations, using historical controls, showed that non-RSI patients had15% more aspirations, 25% more airway trauma, and 3% more deaths [49].

    RSI is not a ‘‘one method fits all’’ technique. Drugs selected to be usedfor RSI should be tailored to the specific scenario and the individual patient.The clinician should be familiar with an array of pharmacological optionsfor emergent endotracheal intubation, including barbiturates, nonbarbitu-rate hypnotics, benzodiazepines, opiates, associative agents, and neuro-muscular blocking agents (Table 1). Each scenario should be evaluated tofind out if there are any relative contraindications to RSI. The major risk ofRSI is that the physician could potentially paralyze a nonapneic patient,making it impossible to intubate, ventilate, or create a surgical airway.

    The emergency physician may choose to perform an awake intubation incertain circumstances. This option is easily employed in patients who arespontaneously breathing but have strong contraindications to paralysis.These include patients with any anatomical barriers that may obstruct theairway and prevent intubation. Patients who are candidates for awake in-tubation may receive nebulized 4% lidocaine to reduce their gag reflex, lightsedation with midazolam, or other appropriate sedating/hypnotic agents[50,51].

    Approach to RSI

    RSI can be divided into five stages: preparation, preoxygenation,premedication with sedation and anesthesia, paralysis, and intubation.

    PreparationPreparation includes appropriate placement of intravenous lines, con-

    tinuous cardiac and pulse oximetry monitoring, and preoxygenation. Cardiacmonitoring is important because the procedure itself may cause cardiac

    19M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • Table

    1

    Sedativeagents

    Physiologic

    effect

    Drug

    Inductiondose

    Recommended

    dose

    forRSI

    Inductiontime

    BP

    ICP

    Comments

    Etomidate

    0.3

    mg/kg

    0.05–0.1

    mg/kg

    10–15s

    Neutral

    flPossible

    epileptogenic/m

    onoclonic

    jerks

    Adrenalsuppression

    ›incidence

    ofN/V

    Fentanyl

    5–7lg/kg

    1–2lg

    /kg

    30–45s

    Neutral

    ?›Chestwallrigidity

    Ketamine

    1–2mg/kg

    0.5–1mg

    30–45s

    ››

    Bronchodilatation

    Emergence

    reaction

    Midazolam

    0.1–0.3

    mg/kg

    1–2mg

    2–3min

    Neutral,fl

    withhigher

    dose

    Neutral

    Longonset,amnesia

    Propofol

    1–2mg/kg

    0.5–1mg/kg

    10–15s

    flfl

    Infusionmaintenance

    forsedation

    Thiopental

    3–5mg/kg

    2–3mg/kgif<65

    1–2mg/kgif>65

    10–15s

    flfl

    Bronchospasm

    Avoid

    inporphyria

    Abbreviations:BP,bloodpressure;IC

    P,intracranialpressure;RSI,rapid

    sequence

    intubation.

    20 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • dysrhythmias [52]. Pulse oximetry alerts the intubator if the patient isbecoming hypoxic. Studies have shown that pulse oximetry can reduce thefrequency and duration of hypoxemia associated with clinical intubation [53].

    Preoxygenation

    Preoxygenation begins with administration of high-flow oxygen to maxi-mize arterial oxygenation. The goal is to avoid using positive pressure ventila-tion to prevent hyperinflation of the stomach, vomiting, and aspiration. Fiveminutes of 100% oxygen is best; however, one study showed that eight deepbreaths over 60 seconds significantly slowed the hemoglobin desaturationthat occurs with apnea [10]. This preoxygenation phase replaces the nitrogenreserves in the lungs with oxygen and allows 3 to 5 minutes of apnea withoutserious hypoxemia in a patient with normal hemodynamics.

    PremedicationPremedication using pharmacological agents can be given to facilitate

    endotracheal intubation. These agents are given to prevent the patient fromexperiencing the physiologic consequences of intubation, such as increasesin pulse, blood pressure, intracranial and intraocular pressure [34,54–56].Sedative and hypnotic agents produce a continuum of physiological effectsthat range from sedation to induction of anesthesia, depending on the doseadministered [51,57–61]. Numerous different agents can be successful invarious scenarios (Table 2). The author recommends that the inductiondoses not be used, but that decreased doses be given and repeated to achievedesired effects.

    Intravenous lidocaine may reduce the cardiovascular response to en-dotracheal tube placement. Studies on this topic are conflicting [46,62,63]. Intravenous lidocaine administered 3 to 5 minutes before intuba-tion may blunt the associated rise in intracranial pressure, though theevidence for this is limited [64–68]. There is no evidence that lidocaineshould be given routinely for rapid sequence intubation in the emergencydepartment. However, it is frequently administered to patients at risk for

    Table 2

    Sedative scenario table

    Condition Sedatives

    Normotensive + euvolemia Propofol, etomidate, thiopental

    › ICP and normal BP Propofol, thiopental› ICP and fl BP EtomidateSevere hypotension or hypovolemia Etomidate, ketamine

    Status asthmaticus Ketamine, etomidate, propofol

    CHF Etomidate

    Status epilepticus Thiopental, propofol, midazolam

    Combative patient Propofol, etomidate, thiopental

    Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; CHF, congestive heart failure; ICP, intracranial pressure.

    21M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • intracranial hypertension, including those with head trauma, presumedcentral nervous system bleeding, or intracranial mass lesions. No ill effectshave been reported.

    ParalysisNeuromuscular blocking agents are used to induce complete paralysis;

    this relaxes the upper airway musculature and makes laryngoscopy easier.There are two classes of neuromuscular blocking agents: depolarizing andnondepolarizing (Table 3). Succinylcholine is the most commonly used de-polarizing agent because of its rapid onset and short duration of action(usually less than 10 minutes). Nondepolarizing agents competitively blockthe acetylcholine receptor on the motor end plate preventing stimulation ofthe skeletal muscle. Nondepolarizing agents do not produce fasciculations;rather, they produce flaccid paralysis.

    Administration of succinylcholine in patients with pseudocholinesterasedeficiencies or underlying medical problems may prolong paralysis sub-stantially [69]. Limitations to use of succinylcholine include elevation ofintracranial pressure, elevated intragastric pressure, prolonged paralysis,hyperkalemia in the susceptible patient, and cardiac dysrhythmias (eg, brady-cardia and asystole) [47,70–74]. Succinylcholine commonly induces mus-culoskeletal fasciculation. If the clinician wishes to avoid fasciculationsassociated with succinylcholine, a subparalytic dose of a nondepolarizingagent can be administered [70,75]. Occasionally, a subparalytic dose ofa nondepolarizing agent may induce clinical paralysis with ventilatorycompromise within 2 to 3 minutes; the clinician should always be preparedfor this scenario. Increased intracranial pressure, concomitant oculartrauma, and patients whose oral intake status is not known are patientsfor which a subparalytic defasciculating dose of a nondepolarizing agent isrecommended.

    IntubationPressure on the cricoid cartilage (Selek’s maneuver) should be applied as

    spontaneous respirations begin to cease. Release should not occur until thepatient is intubated and the cuff is inflated [62,71]. The Selek maneuvershould be discontinued immediately if the patient vomits. Approximately 45to 60 seconds after administration of succinylcholine, the patient should be

    Table 3

    Paralytic agents

    Drug Time to intubation Clinical duration

    Succinylcholine 40–60 s 6–12 min

    Subparalytic dose + SCh 90–120 s 6–12 min

    Rocuronium 45–75 s 30–60 min

    Vecuronium 2–3 min 30–90 min

    Rapacuronium 45–75 s 15–25 min

    22 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • totally apneic and the jaw should be completely relaxed. If these conditionsare not met, the physician should wait an additional 15 seconds and reassessfor optimal conditions. It is better to wait for optimal paralysis than to rushinto a difficult intubation [75].

    Once the patient has met optimal conditions, the clinician shouldintubate the patient under direct visualization of the glottis. The tube shouldbe passed between the vocal cords, the stylet should be removed, the cuffshould be inflated, and placement should be confirmed with auscultation aswell as capnometry. Cricoid pressure should be released. Once there hasbeen confirmation of proper placement of the endotracheal tube, post-intubation care should be undertaken (eg, sedation and paralysis, or, ifneeded, ventilatory management and appropriate diagnostic tests).

    Summary

    Airway control is one of the most critical interventions required forsaving a life. It is essential that practitioners be as well trained as possible inthe numerous techniques available to establish airway control. This articlereviews some of the available techniques, though other techniques that arenot discussed (such as fiberoptic-assisted endotracheal intubation) may alsobe useful. Perhaps the most important aspect of advanced airway manage-ment is the ability to anticipate and prepare for the difficult airway. Thisarticle gives numerous options for the difficult airway situation.

    References

    [1] Benson D, Klain M, Braslow A, et al. Future directions for resuscitation research.

    I. Advanced airway control measures. Resuscitation 1996;32:51–62.

    [2] Levitan RM, Kush S, Hollander JE. Devices for difficult airway management in academic

    emergency departments: results of a national survey. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:694–8.

    [3] Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. A report by the American

    Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway.

    Anesthesiology 1993;78:597–602.

    [4] Sakles JC, Laurin EG, Rantapaa AA, et al. Airway management in the emergency

    department: a one-year study of 610 tracheal intubations. Ann EmergMed 1998;31:325–32.

    [5] Hakala P, Randell T. Intubation difficulties in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a

    retrospective analysis. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandivica 1998;42:195–8.

    [6] Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal

    intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985;32:429–34.

    [7] McIntyre JW. The difficult tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth 1987;34:204–13.

    [8] Block C, Brechner VL. Unusual problems in airway management. II. The influence of the

    temporomandibular joint, the mandible, and associated structures on endotracheal

    intubation. Anesth Analg 1971;50:114–23.

    [9] Posselt U. Positions and movement. In: Blackwell Z, editor. Physiology of occlusion and

    rehabilitation. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: FA Davis, Co.; 1968. p. 25–63.

    [10] Baraka AS, Taha SK, Aouad MT, et al. Preoxygenation: comparison of maximal breathing

    and tidal volume breathing techniques. Anesthesiology 1999;91:612–6.

    23M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • [11] Cook TM. Cricoid pressure: are two hands better than one? Anaesthesia 1996;51:365–8.

    [12] Henderson JJ. The use of paraglossal straight blade laryngoscopy in difficult tracheal

    intubation. Anaesthesia 1997;52:552–60.

    [13] McGill JW, Clinton JE. Tracheal Intubation. In: Roberts JR, Hedges JR, editors. Clinical

    Procedures in EmergencyMedicine. 3rd edition. Philadelphia:WB Saunders; 1998. p. 15–44.

    [14] Walls RM. Airway management. In: Rosen P, Barkin R, editors. Emergency medicine:

    concepts and clinical practice. 4th edition. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc.; 1998. p. 2–24.

    [15] Hung OR, Stevens SC, Hawboldt G. Light-guided vs. laryngoscopic intubation in surgical

    patients: clinical trial of a new lightwand device. Can J Anaesthesia 1992;39:A147.

    [16] Hung OR, Lung KE, Multari J, Stewart RD. Clinical trial of a new lightwand device for

    nasotracheal intubation in surgical patients. Can J Anaesthesia 1993;4:A57.

    [17] Hung OR, Pytka S, Murphy MF, et al. Comparative hemodynamic changes following

    laryngoscopic or lightwand intubation. Anaesthesiology 1993;79:A497.

    [18] Hung OR, Stevens SC, Pytka S, et al. Clinical trial of a new lightwand device for intubation

    in patients with difficult airways. Anaesthesiology 1993;79:A498.

    [19] Atherton GL, Johnson JC. Ability of paramedics to use the Combitube in prehospital

    cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1263–8.

    [20] Blostein PA, Koestner AJ, Hoak S. Failed rapid sequence intubation in trauma patients:

    esophageal tracheal combitube is a useful adjunct. J Trauma 1998;44:534–7.

    [21] Frass M, Frenzer R, Adrahal F, et al. The esophageal tracheal Combitube: preliminary

    results with a new airway for CPR. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:768–72.

    [22] Pennant JH, White PF. The laryngeal mask airway: its uses in anesthesiology.

    Anesthesiology 1993;79:144–63.

    [23] Verghese C, Brimacombe JR. Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients:

    safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage. Anesth Analg 1996;

    82:129–33.

    [24] Danzl DF, Thomas DM. Nasotracheal intubations in the emergency department. Crit Care

    Med 1980;8:677–82.

    [25] Pointer J. Utilizing nasotracheal intubation to full potential. ER Rep 1982;3:143.

    [26] Gross JB, Hartigan ML, Schaffer DM. A suitable substitute for 4% cocaine before blind

    nasotracheal intubation: 3% lidocaine – 0.25% phenylephrine nasal spray. Anesth Analg

    1984;63:915–8.

    [27] Mokriski BK, Malinow AM, Gray WC, et al. Topical nasopharyngeal anesthesia with

    vasoconstriction in pre-eclampsia–eclampsia. Can J Anesth 1988;35:641–3.

    [28] Denlinger JK, Ellison N, Ominsky AJ. Effects of intratracheal lidocaine on circulatory

    response to trachea intubation. Anesthesiology 1974;41:409–12.

    [29] Childres WF. New method for fiberoptic endotracheal intubation of anesthetized patients.

    Anesthesiology 1981;55:595–6.

    [30] Maltby JR, Cassidy M, Nanji GM. Blind nasotracheal intubation using succinylcholine.

    Anesthesiology 1988;69:946–8.

    [31] Verdile VP, Heller MB, Paris PM, et al. Nasotracheal intubation in traumatic craniofacial

    dislocation: use of the lighted stylet. Am J Emerg Med 1988;6:39–41.

    [32] Binning R. Letter: a hazard of blind nasal intubation. Anesthesiology 1974;29:366–7.

    [33] Fry ENS. Letter to the editor. Nasopharyngeal airways. Can Anaesth Soc J 1977;24:144.

    [34] King HK, Wang LF, Khan AK, et al. Translaryngeal guided intubation for difficult

    intubation. Crit Care Med 15:869–71.

    [35] McNamara RM. Retrograde intubation of the trachea. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:680–2.

    [36] Powell WF, Ozdil T. A translaryngeal guide for tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg

    1967;46:231–4.

    [37] Heller EM, Schneider KK, Saven B. Percutaneous retrograde intubation. Laryngoscope

    1989;99:554–5.

    [38] Barriot P, Riou B. Retrograde technique for tracheal intubation in a trauma patient. Crit

    Care Med 1988;16:712–3.

    24 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • [39] Borland LM, Swan DM, Leff S. Difficult pediatric endotracheal intubation: a new

    approach to the retrograde technique. Anesthesiology 1981;55:577–8.

    [40] Cooper CM, Murray-Wilson A. Retrograde intubation: management of a 4.8 kg, 5 month

    infant. Anesthesia 1987;42:1197–2000.

    [41] Lechman MJ, Donahoo JS, Macvaugh H. Endotracheal intubation using percutaneous

    retrograde guidewire insertion followed by antegrade fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Crit Care

    Med 1986;14:589–90.

    [42] Waters DJ. Guided blind endotracheal intubation: for patients with deformities of the

    upper airway. Anesthesia 1963;18:158.

    [43] Bourke D, Levesque PR. Modification of retrograde guide for endotracheal intubation.

    Anesth Analg 1974;53:1013–4.

    [44] Brofeldt BT, Panacek EA, Richards JR. An easy cricothyrotomy approach: the rapid four-

    step technique. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:1060–3.

    [45] Davis DP, Bramwell JK, Vilke GM, et al. Cricothyrotomy technique: standard versus the

    Rapid Four-Step Technique. J Emerg Med 1999;17:17–21.

    [46] Stoelting RK. Blood pressure and heart rate changes during short-duration laryngoscopy

    for tracheal intubation: influence of viscous or intravenous lidocaine. Anesth Analg

    1978;57:197–9.

    [47] Stoelting RK, Peterson C. Circulatory changes during anesthetic induction of d-

    Tubocuraine pretreatment, thiamylal, succinylcholine, laryngoscopy, and tracheal lido-

    caine. Anesth Analg 1976;55:77–81.

    [48] Ma OJ, Bentley B II, Debehnke DJ. Airway management practices in emergency medicine

    residencies. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13:501–4.

    [49] Li J, Murphy-Lavoie H, Bugas C, et al. Complications of emergency intubation with and

    without paralysis. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:141–3.

    [50] Poulton TJ, James FM. Cough suppression by lidocaine. Anesthesiology 1979;50:470–2.

    [51] Wright SW, Chudnofsky CR, Dronen SC, et al. Midazolam use in the emergency

    department. Am J Emerg Med 1990;8:97–100.

    [52] Gibbs JM. The effects of endotracheal intubation on cardiac rate and rhythm. N Z Med J

    1967;66:465–9.

    [53] Mateer JR, Olson DN, Stuven HA, et al. Continuous pulse oximetry during emergency

    endotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:675–9.

    [54] Forbes AM, Dally FG. Acute hypertension during induction of anaesthesia and

    endotrachael intubation in a normotensive man. Br J Anaesth 1970;42:618–24.

    [55] Sakabe T, Maekawa T, Ishikawa T, et al. The effects on canine cerebral metabolism and

    circulation related to the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology 1974;40:433–41.

    [56] Takeshima K, Noda K, Higaki M. Cardiovascular response to rapid anesthesia induction

    and endotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1964;43:201–9.

    [57] Bailey PL, Egan TD, Standy TH. Intravenous opioid anesthetics. In: Miller RD, editor.

    Anesthesia. 5th edition. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 273–377.

    [58] Channey DS, Mihic SJ, Harris RA. Hypnotics and sedatives. In: Goodman, Gilman,

    editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th edition. New York: McGraw-

    Hill Companies, Inc.; 2001. p. 399–429.

    [59] Dronen SC. Pharmacologic adjuncts to intubation. In: Roberts JR, Hedges JR, editors.

    Clinical procedures in emergency medicine. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998.

    p. 45–57.

    [60] Fragen RJ, Fluram MJ. Barbiturates. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th edition.

    London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 209–27.

    [61] Reves JG, Glass PSA, Lubarsky DA. Non-barbiturate intravenous anesthetics. In: Miller

    RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th edition. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 228–72.

    [62] Kindler CH, Schumacher PG, Schneider MC, et al. Effects of intravenous lidocaine and/or

    esmolol on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. A double blind,

    controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth 1996;8:491–6.

    25M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

  • [63] Lev R, Rosen P. Prophylactic lidocaine use presentation: a review. J Emerg Med 1994;

    12:499–506.

    [64] Bulow K, Nielson TG, Lund J. The effect of topical lignocaine on intubating conditions

    after propofol—alfentanil induction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996;40:752–6.

    [65] Donegan MF, Bedford RF. Intravenously administered lidocaine prevents intracranial

    hypertension during endotracheal suctioning. Anesthesiology 1980;52:516–8.

    [66] Hamill JF, Bedford RF, Weaver DC. Lidocaine before endotracheal intubation: intra-

    venous or laryngotracheal? Anesthesiology 1981;55:578–81.

    [67] Shapiro HM. Intracranial hypertension. Anesthesiology 1975;43:445–71.

    [68] Silber SH. Rapid sequence intubation in adults with elevated intracranial pressure. A

    survey of emergency medicine residency programs. Am J Emerg Med 1997;15:263–7.

    [69] Taylor P. Agents acting at the neuromuscular junction and autonomic ganglia. In:

    Goodman, Gilman, editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th edition. New

    York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2001. p. 193–214.

    [70] Cullen DJ. The effect of pretreatment with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants on the

    neuromuscular blocking action of succinylcholine. Anesthesiology 1971;35:572–8.

    [71] Gerardi M, Sacchetti A, Cantor R, et al. Rapid-sequence intubation of the pediatric

    patient: Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee of the American College of Emergency

    Physicians. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:55–74.

    [72] Orebaugh SL. Succinylcholine: adverse effects and alternatives in emergency medicine. Am

    J Emerg Med 1999;17:715–21.

    [73] Vinik HR. Intraocular pressure changes during rapid sequence induction and intubation. A

    comparison of rocuronium, atracurium and succinylcholine. J Clin Anest 1999;11:95–100.

    [74] Williams AR, Bailey M, Joye T, et al. Marked prolongation of the succinylcholine effect

    two hours after neostigmine reversal of neuromuscular blockade in a patient with chronic

    renal insufficiency. South Med J 1999;92:77–9.

    [75] Horrow JC, Lambert DH. The search for an optimal interval between pretreatment dose of

    d-tubocurarine and succinylcholine. Can Anaesth Soc J 1984;31:528–33.

    26 M. Blanda, U.E. Gallo /Emerg Med Clin N Am 21 (2003) 1–26

    Emergency airway managementDifficult intubationsHistoryPhysical examAlternative noninvasive techniquesDigital/tactile intubationDirectional tubesStyletsLighted styletsEsophageal–tracheal tubesLaryngeal mask airwayNasotracheal intubation

    Invasive airway managementTranslaryngeal guided (‘‘retrograde’’) intubationPercutaneous transtracheal ventilation or needle cricothyrotomySurgical cricothyrotomy

    Rapid sequence intubationApproach to RSIPreparation

    PreoxygenationPremedicationParalysisIntubation

    SummaryReferences