elpp, 15 november 2010 e-feedback meeting students’ needs & expectations yuhua hu & paul...

20
ELPP, 15 November 2010 e-Feedback Meeting Students’ Needs & Expectations Yuhua Hu & Paul McLaughlin The School of Biological Sciences

Upload: ella-griffith

Post on 04-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

ELPP, 15 November 2010

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

Yuhua Hu & Paul McLaughlinThe School of Biological Sciences

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Since 2007, feedback has become the centre of attention in Edinburgh Biology …

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

• Promptness• Detailed comments• Helpful feedback

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Channels for ‘feedback’?

• Written assignment feedback (e.g., essays, lab practical reports)

• Exam feedback• In/Post-class Q & A (e.g., after a lecture, during a

lab practical)?• Tutorials?• Emails?• Online synchronous/asychronous discussion?

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Definition of ‘feedback’:

“Feedback is information about the gap between the actual level and the reference level of a system parameter which is used to alter the gap in some way.”

“if the information on the gap is merely stored without being utilized to alter the gap, it is not feedback.” ---Ramaprasad (1983, pp4-5)

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Criteria for effective feedback:

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

About the Gap Conducive Factors

Where is the gap?

What is the gap about?

How to alter the gap?

Timeliness

Legibility

Quantity

Clarity

Tone

ELPP, 15 November 2010

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

Technology-Aided Marking Solution

The Hardware:

• PC tablet

• Stylus pen

• Headset with microphone and earphones

ELPP, 15 November 2010

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

Submit

Download

Allocate

Students

Marking TeachersCourse Organiser

Return

Upload

Retrieve

ELPP, 15 November 2010

So what did the students say…

• Promptness

• Detailed comments

• Helpfulness

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Promptness

Expectations: received e-feedback within 2 weeks after submission, more prompt than expected

Needs: chose quality over promptness; for higher quality feedback, they would rather wait for longer

‘I’d rather have my essay feedback a bit later, knowing that the marker had thought about it a bit more than just going through them in a really really quick time and then just read them once.’

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Detailed Comments

Expectations: only expected a mark and a few lines of general comments; surprised and delighted to find very detailed, specifically marked corrections and comments

‘… throughout the actual essay, you had a lot of commentary on the side of your essay so you could relate to where you’d gone wrong.’

‘I was impressed. They marked the essay with the little comments, but they also gave overall feedback of that marker’s group. So you got a lot of feedback …’

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Detailed CommentsNeeds: more feedback, especially more feedback on how to improve for their next assignment, e.g., more examples to model on [this was mentioned by both high-achieving students and less able students] and more guidance on scientific writing

‘If one has really really good essays, … [the marker should] still try to give points where one could improve.’

‘You can’t have too much feedback, whether it’s praise or criticism. … It’s been enough, what I’ve had so far, but obviously I would like more.’

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Helpfulness

Expectations: expected only brief and general comments, but instead received understandable and constructive feedback

‘It explained to me like, where I’d lost marks on and how I could improve them and how my essay all tied together.’

‘… it’d say, ‘you could leave this out in the future’ or ‘this bit’s not right and you maybe need to change your graph slightly’.’

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Helpfulness

Needs: distinct differences in perceptions as for what counts as ‘helpful’ feedback

Comments on skills development Comments on content

‘I would rather have them to talk about actual biological aspect of what’s going on rather than scientific writing sessions.’

‘I would much rather have a feedback that’s negative to help

you improve.’

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Other strengths mentioned:

• Easy access• Legibility• Privacy • Likely feedforward

… the interviewees almost unanimously agree that this e-Marking practice should be implemented for the other courses as well.

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

2009 NSS results (Biology):

• Overall, the School has achieved a higher rating (89%) [the top quartile of Scottish universities is 89%]

• The assessment and feedback scale showed improvement (35%), but the three feedback items still scored less than the midpoint.

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

But … …

Can we do without the technology?

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

source: http://www.tla.ed.ac.uk/feedback/staff/resources.html

ELPP, 15 November 2010

What we’d like to do in future (technical):

• Automated downloading of student assignments and allocation to different markers

• Automated uploading of e-feedback to the virtual learning system

• Scalability: from dedicated PC tablets to markers’ work stations or laptops?

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

Similar e-Marking Cases:

• Aitken, A. M. 1998. All in a Word: Complete Electronic Assignments with Microsoft Word.

• Cargill, M. 2001. Enhancing Essay Feed-Back Using 'MindTrail' Software: Exactly What Makes the Difference in Student Development?

• Bancroft, P., J. Hynd, F. D. Santo and J. Reye. 2003. Web-Based Assignment Submission and Electronic Marking.

• Campbell, A. 2005. Application of ICT and Rubrics to the Assessment Process Where Professional Judgement is Involved: The Features of an E-marking Tool.

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations

ELPP, 15 November 2010

e-FeedbackMeeting Students’ Needs & Expectations