electron momentum distributions in short-pulse double ionization -- agreement with a classical model...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
Electron Momentum Distributions in Short-Pulse Double Ionization --
Agreement with a Classical Model in 3DS.L. Haan, A. Karim (presenter), and L. Breen
Calvin CollegeGrand Rapids MI 49546
J.H. EberlyUniversity of RochesterRochester NY 14627
Work supported by Calvin College, NSF, and DOEAK conference attendance supported by APS
• We study double ionization of two electron atoms in strong laser fields using ensembles of 400,000 3D classical model atoms.
• This talk will emphasize results rather than technique.--will summarize results presented in
S.L. Haan, L. Breen, A. Karim, and J.H. Eberly, submitted
Laser parameters:
– wavelength 780 nm– Linearly polarized in z direction– For results we’ll show today, we use a 10-cycle
trapezoidal pulse with 2 cycle turn-on and 2-cycle turn off.
Final Momenta of ionized electron pairs• Plot final momentum
along direction of laser polarization for one ionized electron vs. the other
• Preference for quadrants 1 and 3 (same-momentum hemisphere), but population is present in all 4 quadrants
• Having population in all 4 quadrants is consistent with experiment--and different from predictions of most theoretical treatments
I=.2 PW/cm2 I=.4 PW/cm2
I=.6 PW/cm2 I=.8 PW/cm2
Cause of opposite hemisphere emissions?
• We can backtrack doubly ionizing trajectories to learn cause!
• Trajectories show recollision typically followed by a short time delay before final ionization.
Careful sorting…Recollision time -- time of closest approach of two electrons after first electron achieves E>0.
Double ionization time -- time at which both electrons achieve E>0 or both escape nuclear well.
Delay time: recollision to double ionization
• Most DI trajectories show a part-cycle phase delay between recollision and double ionization– Less than 15%
show “nearly immediate ionization” after recollision.
– Nonetheless, for I≥.4 PW/cm2, over half the DI occurs within 1/3 cycle of recollision.
Final momenta sorted by: delay times from recollision to ionization
and by final direction relative to recollision direction
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
delay<1/25 cycle delay<1/4 cycle
delay<1/2 cycle delay≥1/2 cycle
RE directions--adjust signs of momenta so all collisions occur with returning electron traveling in the +z direction.
•For small delay times, almost all emergences are opposite from the recollision direction.
•With increased delay times, there is increased spillover into the 2nd and 4th quadrants.
I=6x1014 W/cm2
Final momenta sorted by: delay times from recollision to ionization and by final direction relative to recollision
directiondelay<1/25 cycle delay<1/4 cycle
delay<1/2 cycle delay≥1/2 cycle
RE directions--adjust signs of momenta so all collisions occur with returning electron traveling in the +z direction.
•For small delay times, almost all emergences are opposite from the recollision direction.
•With increased delay times, there is increased spillover into the 2nd and 4th quadrants.
I=6x1014 W/cm2
So…
Q: When in the laser cycle do the recollisions and ionizations typically occur?– Simpleman model: The most energetic
recollision events occur just before a laser zero
– (e.g. Corkum 71, 1994 (1993))
– The confining potential-energy barrier is most suppressed when the field is maximal a quarter cycle later
# of recollisions and ionizations vs. laser phase
Background curve shows laser cycle.Red--double ionization within 1/4 cycle of recollision and emergence in same momentum hemisphereGreen--similar, but emerge in opposite momentum hemispheresBlue--remaining DI trajectories (i.e., delay time > 1/4 cycle).
• Collisions peak just before a zero of the laser (bins 5 & 10).• But Ionizations peak just before the laser reaches full strength (bins 2-
3 & 7-8).Inference: Recollisions near zeros produce an excited complex that
typically ionizes during the next laser maximum
(laser phase bin #)
Of drift velocities
• Drift velocity for an electron exposed to an oscillating force
-eE0sin(t) is
vπ/2 = v0 − eE0/(mω)
where
v0 = instantaneous velocity at ωt = 0
vπ/2 = instantaneous velocity at ωt = π/2 and = drift velocity
So, suppose recollision occurs in + direction at
ωt = nπ and an electron is free just after collision with velocity v0 > 0– laser force has just been in + direction and will now begin
pushing in the - direction– Drift velocity for that electron is vπ/2 = v0 − eE0/(mω)
• Partial cancellation Maximum value for |vπ/2| = eE0/(mω)
Our description of the DI process
Up to about 15% of the time (depending on intensity), recollision leads nearly immediately to double ionization.Recollisions most often occur as laser field passes through
zero; both electrons have small speed immediately after collision (< eE0/(mω)) and are pushed back opposite from the recollision direction
Aside -- often returning electron misses on first return
Vdrift = v(t=/2+n)
laser force
• Because of the direction change, the maximum drift speed for either electron is
eE0/(mω)
In most cases there is a time lag between recollision and the ionization of the second electron
• If second electron ionizes before laser peaks then (to first approximation) it can follow the other electron out in the negative direction (opposite from the recollision direction)
laser force
Vdrift = v(t=/2+n)
• But if the phase delay is too great (to first approx, electron emergence after the field peaks), the electrons can have drift velocities in opposite momentum hemispheres.
laser force