electrochim acta 75, 2012
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
1/29
Post-print of: Electrochimica Acta Volume 75, 30 July 2012, Paes 13!"1#7
http:$$%&'%oi'or$10'101($)'electacta'2012'0#'0*7
Efect o nanostructured electrode architecture and semiconductordeposition strategy on the photovoltaic perormance o quantum
dot sensitized solar cells
+ahmou% ama%pour a, , i&to .im/ne a, Palo P' oi& a, in hen c,
%, +auricio E' al4o e, ima 6aha4inia , f, Aam ra)i a% , f, 6aro
6oyo%a c, 8ern9n +ue e, 49n +ora-er; a
a .rup %e ptoelectr?nics, o& 11155-*(3!, 6ehran, ran
c , Japan cience an% 6echnoloy Aency CJ6D, #-1-* 8oncho
aFauchi, aitama 332-0012, Japan
e nstituto %e iencia %e +ateriales %e e4illa, -@, A4eni%a Am/rico
Vespucio #!, #10!2 e4illa, pain
f o& 11155-
!1(1, 6ehran, ran
Abstract
8ere Fe analye the eGect of tFo rele4ant aspects relate% to cell
preparation on Huantum %ot sensitie% solar cells C2 nanostructure% electro%e an% the roFth metho% of
Huantum %ots C2 %epen%s on the
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
2/29
metho%' 8iher Voc 4alues are systematically otaine% for 6i>2
morpholoies Fith %ecreasin surface area an% for cells usin < roFth
metho%' 6his is systematically correlate% to a hiher recomination
resistance of < sensitie% electro%es' Electron in)ection inetics from 2 also %epen%s on oth the 6i>2 structure an% the
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
3/29
oth the architecture of the Fi%e an%ap o&i%e semicon%uctor 6i>2 an%
the liht asorin semicon%uctor %eposition stratey on the photo4oltaic
performance of
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
4/29
N3#O an% successi4e ionic layer a%sorption an% reaction CABD N12O' oth
metho%s are ase% on loF cost solution processes, i%eal for up-scalin an%
farication of cost-eGecti4e photo4oltaic %e4ices' Ie ha4e carrie% out a
systematic stu%y comprisin structural, optical, photophysical an%
photoelectrochemical characteriation in or%er to correlate the material
properties of the photoano%es Fith the functional performance of themanufacture% D' 6he three
nanoparticulate% structures CP20, P250 an% P20"#50D Fere otaine% fromcommercial pastes from C6i>2 particle sie 250 nmD an% C6i>2 particle sie 20"#50
nmD, respecti4ely' 6he rst paste pro%uces electro%es Fith hih eGecti4e
surface area, Fhile the other tFo are commonly employe% as liht
scatterin layers in materialD Fere %octor-
la%e% on transparent con%uctin Tuorine %ope% tin o&i%e C=6>D lass
sustrates Csheet resistance U10 $WD' 6he resultin photoelectro%es Fere
sintere% at #50 S, to otain oo% mechanical an% electrical contact at the
interfaces 6i>2$6i>2 an% 6i>2$sustrate' efore %eposition of the %iGerent
6i>2 structures, the =6> sustrates Fere coate% y a compact layer of 6i>2
%eposite% y spray pyrolysis CU100 nm thicD' 6hese electro%es Fere
calcinate% at #50 S for 30 min' =or samples > an% =, it has een %etecte% a
loF mechanical staility an% poor a%hesion Fith the sustrate'
#
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
5/29
.. Electrode sensitization
6he %iGerent 6i>2 nanostructure% electro%es Fere sensitie% y %$%e
2 Forin electro%e into
the metal precursors an% suseHuently into the sul%e solutions' After each
ath, the photoano%e is thorouhly rinse% y immersion in the
correspon%in sol4ent to remo4e the chemical resi%uals from the surface
an% suseHuently %rie% in air' 6he %e %eposition after % coatin Fas
performe% y tFo metho%s AB an% 3D solution Fas prepare% y reTu&in elemental e
an% a2>3 in +illi- Fater at *0 S for ( h Fith 2 Tu&' 6he chemical ath
solution Fas prepare% y mi&in *0 m+ of %># an% *0 m+ of a2e>3
solution Fith 120 m+ of nitriloacetic aci%' 6he sensitie% 6i>2 electro%es
Fere immerse% in the chemical ath solution at 10 S for 12 h' 6hen, the
electro%es Fere Fashe% Fith +illi- Fater an% %rie% Fith 2 un' t is Fell
noFn that a see% layer of % sinicantly enhances the roFth rate of
%e, pro%ucin an increase of the liht asorption for the same >D2 an% 0'1 + a2 solutions for 1 min$%ip, rinsin Fith +illi-
ultrapure Fater etFeen %ips N#1O' At least tFo cells Fith the same
con%itions C6i>2 nanostructure an% < %eposition mo%eD ha4e een
prepare% an% analye%'
.%. &'"( preparation
6he solar cells Fere prepare% y san%Fichin a u2 counter electro%e an%
a 8 solution in +illi- ultrapure
5
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
6/29
Fater N13O an% N1#O' 6he u2 counter electro%es Fere prepare% y
immersin a rass foil in 8l solution at 70 S for 5 min an% suseHuently
%ippin it into polysul%e solution for 10 min, resultin in a porous u2
electro%e' 6he eometric area of the cells Fas 0'2* cm2'
.). *hotoanode and solar cell characterization
.as a%sorption measurements, E6, Fere performe% on a +icromeritics
AAP 2020 surface area an% porosity analyer Fith the AAP 2020 V3'0# E
softFare' 6hree measurements Fere carrie% out for each specimen in or%er
to assess the repro%uciility of the results' +icrostructural e&amination of
the sensitie% photoano%es Fas carrie% out y a J+-7000= JE> =E.-E+
system C6oyo, JapanD' 6ransmission electron microscopy Fas carrie% out y
usin a hih resolution 6E+ C8B6E+D =iel% Emission .un JE+-2100 electron
microscope CJE>D operate% at 200 V' 6E+ samples Fere prepare% y
rain oG the mesoporous sensitie% photoano%es from the =6> coate%
lass' 6he poF%er specimens Fere sonicate% in asolute ethanol for 5 min,
an% a feF %rops of the resultin suspension Fere %eposite% onto a holey-
caron lm supporte% on a copper ri%, Fhich Fas suseHuently %rie%'
6he optical asorption spectra of the photoano%es Fere recor%e% in the
rane of 300"*00 nm y a ary 500 @V-V Varian spectrometer, no
interatin sphere has een employe% in the measurement' urrent"
potential CJ"VD cur4es, impe%ance spectroscopy CD measurement, applie%
ias 4oltae %ecay CAVriel nstruments' mpe%ance spectroscopy measurements Fere
carrie% out in %ar con%itions applyin a 20 mV A sinal Fith the freHuency
ranin etFeen #00 8 an% 0'1 8 at %iGerent forFar% iases' @ltrafast
carrier %ynamics ha4e een e4aluate% y the lens-free hetero%yne %etection
transient ratin C=-8PAD Ca 6>AP from uantroni&D to
enerate liht pulses Fith a Fa4elenth tunale from 2!0 nm to 3 ZmL use%
as a pump liht in the 6. measurement' n this stu%y, the pump pulse
Fa4elenth Fas 520 nm an% the proe pulse Fa4elenth Fas 775 nm' ince
most reliale results are otaine% Forin in transmission conuration,only P20 an% = specimens Fere teste%'
(
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
7/29
%. +esults and discussion
%.1. "tructural characterization
6he relationship etFeen structural features an% functional performance of
the %e4ices pro4i%es a poFerful tool oth to un%erstan% the mechanisms of
the rele4ant processes tain place %urin %e4ice operation as Fell as to
optimie the %esin of the %iGerent components lea%in to optimum
performance N10O' =i' 1 shoFs the top 4ieF of the %iGerent 6i>2 structures
stu%ie%' 6he cross sectional 4ieFs are inclu%e% in the upplementary
nformation as =i' 1' =rom these microraphs, it is clear the %iGerent
electro%e morpholoy an% the %iGerent sie %istriution of the
nanoparticulate% structures' n a%%ition, E6 measurements Fere use% for
the %etermination of the pore sie' 6he P20 material is characterie% y a
narroF sie %istriution aroun% 20 nm Csee =i' 2D, an% it is use% as the
typical structure for transparent 6i>2 electro%es' 6he other tFo
nanoparticulate% systems CP20"#50 an% P250D are use% as scatterin layers
in ' @pon sensitiation y AB
or < metho%s, the structure of the 6i>2 photoelectro%es in noF
conformally coate% Fith a thin lm of %$%e Cthicness aroun% 5 nmD'
6hese structures Fere measure% y 6E+ an% are shoFn in the
upplementary +aterial in =i' 2' =rom these 6E+ microraphs, no
sinicant morpholoical chanes in the
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
8/29
>ne of the ey functional properties of the photoelectro%es is the liht
har4estin capaility' onseHuently, the optical asorance of the sensitie%
electro%es is shoFn in =i' 3' 6here is a oo% correlation etFeen the
asorance an% the surface area in%epen%ently of the sensitiation metho%
CAB or 2
eGecti4e surface area' on4ersely, the correspon%ence of the measure%PE C=i' 3D Fith the surface area of the electro%es is %epen%ent on the
sensitiation metho%' Ihen AB is employe%, the PE increases
monotonically Fith the surface area of the electro%es Ci'e' optical
asoranceD, Fhile Fhen < is use%, this tren% is not folloFe% for the
hihest surface area structure Cmaterial 6D' 6he ma&imum PE 4alues
otaine% in the present stu%y are aout (0"70M' 6he use of 6i>2 layers Fith
%iGerent structures in the same electro%e in or%er to impro4e the liht
scatterin enhances the PE results otaine% in this For N1!O, N20O, N23O
an% N3(O, ut are not in the scope of the present stu%y' n this stu%y Fe are
intereste% in the eGect of each particular structure on the 2 structures rane%
y acti4e surface area C> ] = ] P250 ] P20"#50 ] = R P20 ] P20D an% for
oth
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
9/29
interme%iate surface area CP20"#50 structureD, an% %ecreasin for the
samples Fith hihest surface area' 6he %escrie% tren%s ha4e the folloFin
implications: the solar cell parameters stronly %epen% on oth the
architecture of the nanostructure% electro%e an% the < roFth metho%'
=ocusin on the eGect on Voc, Fe systematic oser4e% hiher Voc 4alues for
< samples, see =i' (' ote, %espite the poor a%hesion of the stu%ie% >an% = electro%es Voc is also hiher for < cells in this situation compare%
to AB samples' >pen structures Ci'e' loFer eGecti4e surface areaD also
e&hiit hiher Voc 4alues' 6he AB metho% is more a%eHuate for structures
Fith hih surface area' on4ersely, the < metho% pro%uces etter
performin %e4ices for more opene% structures, see 6ale 2' n the 2 con%uction an%'>n the other han%, a shift in Z can e oser4e% %epen%in on the 6i>2
structure' amples prepare% Fith scatterin pastes e&hiit an upFar%s
%isplacement of the con%uction an%, contriutin to the hiher Voc
otaine% for P20"#50 an% P250 samples in comparison Fith P20 sample, see
6ale 2, note that comparin samples usin the same %eposition metho%,
AB or
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
10/29
CloFer recomination rateD N#*O compare% to AB samples' 6he > structure
is an e&ception, ut the results otaine% Fith this structure are less
repro%ucile %ue to mechanical a%hesion prolems, lea%in to %iKculties for
the %irect comparison etFeen %iGerent samples' 6his tren% e&plains the
hiher Voc %etecte% in < cells' >n the other han%, it has een shoFn that
the 2 morpholoies an% 2$%e nanocomposite
structures can e tte% to a %oule e&ponential %ecay N32O, N3!O an% N50O:
Y A1eYt$1RA2eYt$2
Fhere A1 an% A2 are pree&ponential factors an% _1 Cfast componentD
reTects the electron in)ection from 2
surface an% the contriution of hole %ynamics Cpro4i%e% that the ratio A1$A2
is close to 0'3D, see =i' !CaD N32O' >n the other han%, _2 CsloF componentD
inclu%es the contriution to the electron in)ection from 2, see =i' !CaD N32O' 6he results of the ttins are
shoFn in 6ale 3 for P20 an% = structures Fith %e 2:=D in the case of
= sample' t has een shoFn that the < in)ection from %e 2
is faster than the in)ection into 6i>2N51O' omparin oth
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
11/29
a stron inTuence on oth the electron in)ection an% the recomination
process'
). (onclusions
Ie %emonstrate% the ey role of the 6i>2 structure an% the 2 is %iGerent for oth 2 morpholoies an% for the < metho%' 6his is
systematically correlate% to an upFar%s shift in the 6i>2 con%uction an% of
scatterin pastes Fith rear% to transparent paste an% to the hiher
recomination resistance CloFer recomination rateD oser4e% for 2 structures' CaD =,
CD P20"#50, CcD P250, C%D P20, CeD = R P20 an% CfD >' 6he scale ar is 500
nm for all microraphs'
=iure 2' ie %istriution e&tracte% from E6 measurements for the
%iGerent structures teste%'
=iure 3' >ptical asorance of the sensitie% electro%es an% PE of the
respecti4e manufacture% solar cells'
=iure #' J"V cur4es of the %iGerent solar cells'
=iure 5' Photo4oltaic parameters for the %iGerent 6i>2 morpholoies
rane% y surface area C> ] = ] P250 ] P20"#50 ] = R P20 ] P20D for oth2 structures an% for oth
-
7/23/2019 Electrochim Acta 75, 2012
18/29
6ale 1
Table 1. BET surface area, porosity and total area of the electrodes with the
different TiO2structures (geometrical area of the electrodes is 0.2 cm
2
!.
#i$morphology E# /m0g *orosity #otal surace /cm
= *2'*# 0'!0 2(*a
P20"#50 27'33 0'2! 250
P250 10'15 0'31 !2
P20 73'*2 0'#0 (75
a urface area consi%erin the 2"3 nm porosity, see =i' 2, note that
the surface a4ailale for < %eposition is sensily loFer as the