electrical characterization of rollers & belts for high · pdf fileelectrical...
TRANSCRIPT
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 1
Electrical Characterization of
Rollers & Belts for High
Speed Electrophotography
Ming-Kai Tse and Inan Chen
Quality Engineering Associates (QEA), Inc. Contact information as of 2010:
755 Middlesex Turnpike, Unit 3
Billerica MA 01821 USA Tel.: 1+ 978-528-2034
Fax: 1+ 978-528-2033
www.QEA.com
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Outline
• What characterization method –
measurement of dielectric relaxation
• Why – correlates with process
fundamentals
• Traditional resistance measurement
method – what’s wrong
• ECD method – what’s right
• Analysis & Experimental Results
2
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Dielectric Relaxation of Rollers & Belts
is Critical to the Performance of
Several EP Processes
Characterization of dielectric relaxation is the key!
3
Transfer Belt or
Transfer Roller
Media
Charge Roller
Photoconductor
Image
Development
Roller
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Why Dielectric Relaxation is Important?
4
Conductive
Elastomer
OPC Drum
Semi-insulating
Coating
Charging
Metering
Blade
Donor
Roll
PR
Development
Need to understand
the process physics Vb
Transfer
Media
PR
Toner
Air Gap
Roller, Belt
or Paper
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
QEA Research & Publications
5
Year Conference Subject
1999 JHC ECD method for semi-insulators
1999 NIP15 Modeling of electrostatic transfer
2000 NIP16 Transfer media
2001 NIP17 Corona charging current
2002 ICIS Charge mobility measurement
2004 NIP20 Transfer of color images
2005 JHC Semi-insulating devices
2005 NIP21 Roller charging of photoreceptor
2006 ICIS Media non-uniformity issues
2006 NIP22 Counter charge in development rollers
2008 PPIC Aging of donor rolls
2008 NIP24 Characterization for high speed EP
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 6
• Roll coating voltage, VR
• Air gap voltage, VA
• VA > Paschen threshold
• PR surface charged, QP
• Counter-charge QR on Roll
• Air-gap voltage, VA
• VA < Paschen threshold
• PR charging stops
• To continue charging,
QR must be neutralized
to VR and VA
• Dielectric relaxation in roll
coating important for high
charging efficiency
Vb
+ + + + + QR
– – – – – QP
Dielectric Relaxation in CR Charging
CR Coating, VR
Air Gap, VA
Photoreceptor, VP
A qualitative description:
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Toner Charging in Single Component
Development
7
Counter-charge (+) injection from VB
VRC decays, dielectric relaxation of roller coating
Dev.
Roll
PR
VB
VB
MB
Dev.
Roll
PR
VBVB
VB
MB
Donor Roll = Conductive Core + Semi-ins. Overcoat
Toner Charging (–) at Metering Blade (M-B)
M-B
– – Toner – –
+ + + + + +
Roll Coating
VB
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Toner Deposition in Single Component
Development
8
Toner Deposition on Photoreceptor (PR)
Counter-charge (–) injection from VB to Coating
Dielectric Relaxation of Roll Coating layer
Dev.
Roll
PR
VB
VB
MB
Dev.
Roll
PR
VBVB
VB
MBVB
Roller Coating
– + – + – + –
– – – Toner – –
+ + + + + + + PR
Counter-charge injection
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Electrostatic Transfer of Developed Toner
Bias voltage applied to multiple layers
VB reverses field direction in toner layer
Receiving media (Paper, Belt),
(semi-insulator) much thicker than
other layers
Dielectric Relaxation in receiver
• Shifts most of VB to toner layer
• Enables efficient transfer
– without very high bias voltages
• occurs by charge injection
9
Charge injection
- - - - Toner - - -
Air-gap
PR
VB
Receiving Media
(100 mm)
+ + + + + +
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Common Configuration & Implications
on Characterization Method
VB applied to insulator & semi-insulator
in series
Voltage across semi-insulator decays
with time Dielectric Relaxation
Low intrinsic charge density
Need charge injection
Performance of process closely related
to efficiency of dielectric relaxation,
charge injection and transport
Due to the complexity in the charge
transport processes in dielectric
relaxation – best characterize by a test
method that simulates actual device!
10
Semi-Insulator
VB Insulator (PR, Air)
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Process Time
11
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Conventional Roller & Belt
Characterization Method
• DC bias voltage is applied between an electrode in contact with
the charge roller and the roller shaft. The current flow through
the roller ISS is measured, typically at “steady state”.
• The roller resistance is the ratio of the applied VB to the
measured ISS.
12
A
VB
ISS
Electrode
Pressure
VB
Iss
R =
A
ISS
VB
A “Close-circuit” Method
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Limitations of Conventional
Resistance Method • Most serious is that the underlying physics is not
consistent with the process physics:
– Ohmic relaxation model does not apply
– Semi-insulator to electrode contact is non-ohmic
– Test configuration does not simulate process configuration
- no way to duplicate charge transport physics crucial to
process performance (e.g., electric field dependence)
– Measurement time scale is wrong
• Practical issues:
– Contact pressure dependence
– No mapping capability
• Results do not reliably or consistently predict
performance
13
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Ohmic vs Non-Ohmic Contact
“Ohmic” contacts:
Supply charge to maintain q = qi (intrinsic charge
density) in sample
Current density: J = sEo = mqiEo (Eo = applied field)
“Non-Ohmic” contacts:
Supply more or less charge (injection)
Charge density q(x, t) qi ; E(x, t) Eo ; J sE
Semi-insulating devices are typically Non-ohmic.
Injection at interface is key to the relaxation process.
Conductivity, s : not a good figure of merit!
14
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
An Example of the Role of Injection –
Photo-induced Discharge in Photoreceptor
In the dark: an insulator with high resistivity with long
dielectric relaxation time t Exposed to light: charges photo-generated in CGL; charge
injection into CTL Voltage decreases Photo-induced
Dielectric Relaxation
15
Light on off
V
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
– – – – – – – – – – – –
CGL
CTL
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
“Open-Circuit” Method
is Preferred to Simulate Actual Device
16
Semi-Insulator
VB Insulator (PR, Air)
Semi-Insulator
VB
Semi-Insulator
HV
- - - - - -
Semi-insulator
in Open Circuit
Testing Semi-insulator
In Open Circuit
Testing Semi-insulator
In Closed Circuit
Traditional Resistance
Measurement Preferred ECD Method Device Configuration
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Charge Transport Model of
Dielectric Relaxation (1)
Samples characterized by:
• Charge densities: qp(x,t), qn (x,t)
• Charge mobility: mp, mn
Charge Continuity:
q(y, t)/t = – (mqE)/y
Boundary conditions:
• Injection current at y = 0
J(0, t) = sE(0, t), s = Injection strength
• Interface charge: QL = eIEI – eDED(L)
(Gauss’ theorem)
• Bias VB = VD + VI (constant in time)
Solved by Numerical iterations
17
Semi-Insulator
VB Insulator (PR, Air)
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 18
Voltage VD(t) across semi-
insulator (dielectric) depends
strongly on injection strength
1E-3
1E-2
1E-1
1E+0
0 50 100 150 200Time
Vo
ltag
e :
Die
lectr
ic
Equiv-ckt model
s = 0.01
0.03
1.0
0.3
0.1
Hybrid080213/1
Li = 0.5
ei = 0.5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Time
VD(0
) -
VD(t
)
s = 1.0
0.01
0.03
0.1
0.3
Hybrid080213/1
Li = 0.5
ei = 0.5
Voltage decay: VD(0) – VD(t):
significant effect of s in time
t 10 to 100 to, (to= L2/mVB)
Charge Transport Model of
Dielectric Relaxation (2)
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 19
Photoreceptor surface voltage increases with time
Significant effect of charge injection strength in time t 100 to
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1 10 100 1000
Time
PR
Su
rface V
olt
ag
e
s = 10.3
0.01
0.03
0.1
ChgR080214/2Vdc = 1.0
qi = 0.1
Conductive
Elastomer
OPC Drum
Semi-insulating
Coating
Roller Charging of Photoreceptor
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 10 100 1000
Time
To
ner
Ch
arg
e D
en
sit
y Vb = 0.2
qi = 0.1
up= un= 1
Lr = 1
Lt = 0.3
e r = 1
e t = 1
SCDC060107/1
s = 1
0.3
0.10.03
0.01
20
Toner Charging (–) at Metering Blade (MB)
Counter-charge (+) injection into Roll Coating
Dependence on injection strength s in t 100 to
Toner Charging in
Single Component Development
Metering
Blade
Donor
Roll
PR
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 21
Toner deposition (–) on photoreceptor PR
Counter-charge (-) injection into Roll Coating
Dependence on injection strength s in t 100 to
Toner Deposition in
Single Component Development
Metering
Blade
Donor
Roll
PR 0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Time
Dep
osit
ion
Eff
icie
ncy
Vd = -1
qt = 3
qi = 0.1
u =1
s = 1
0.3
0.01
0.03
0.1
SCD060104/2
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Time
Eff
icie
ncy
Transf81808/2
s = 1.0
0.3
0.1
0.03
0.01
qi=0.1
Qt =-4
Va=1
22
Dielectric Relaxation in receiver
• Enables efficient transfer without very high VB
• increase transfer efficiency; depends significantly
on injection strength s
Electrostatic Transfer of
Developed Toner
Vb
PR
Toner
Air Gap
Roller, Belt
or Paper
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 23
Close resemblance in analytical results for voltage decay and
processes provides strong support for the critical role of
dielectric relaxation on EP performance
Significant effects of s in t = 10~100 to, i.e., transient behavior
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Time
VD(0
) -
VD(t
)
s = 1.0
0.01
0.03
0.1
0.3
Hybrid080213/1
Semi-Ins
Insulator
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Time
Dep
osit
ion
Eff
icie
ncy
s = 1
0.3
0.01
0.03
0.1
SCD060104/2
Transient in Dielectric Relaxation is
Most Critical to Performance
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 24
• Roller or Belt Relaxation Time:
Charge transit time to = L2/mVB 5 ms; with: L 50 mm, m
10-5 cm2/V-s, VB 500 volts; full relaxation time is tP >
100to 0.5 sec or 500 ms.
Relaxation Time vs Process Time
• Therefore must
consider
transient
behavior in
characterization;
particularly for
high speed
printing.
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Implementation – the ECD Method
25
Semi-Insulator
HV
- - - - - -
Testing Semi-insulator
In Open Circuit
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 26
Charge Roller Mapping
• The full-body ECD map shown below for a poor charge roller clearly
demonstrates the correlation between VECD and print quality.
• The non-uniformity in VECD can be mapped directly to a print density
variation map (on a gray page) and a background map (on a white page).
Such results clearly demonstrate the efficacy of the ECD method.
* Charge roller circumference
279.4mm (11”)
37.7mm*
ECD Full-body Map
60 100 140 180 volt
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 27
Good Roller
50% Gray Page
ECD Re Map
* The ECD Re map is scaled to physical size.
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 28
Bad Roller
50% Gray Page
ECD Re Map
* The ECD Re map is scaled to physical size.
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 29
Dot Gain, Optical Density and Tone Reproduction
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
300 400 500 600 700
Equivalent Resistance, Re (MW-cm2)
Op
ical
Den
sit
y (
OD
)
PD=5
PD=1
Dot Gain, Optical Density & Tone
Reproduction
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 30
Background
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
300 400 500 600 700
Equivalent Resistance, Re (MW-cm2)
Back
gro
un
d G
S
PD = 5
PD = 1
Background
where i = 1 to N
a
d
GS i
i-
46 )(1074.4
and a is the ROI area
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 31
Ghosting
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
300 400 500 600 700
Equivalent Resistance, Re (MW-cm2)
DO
D
PD = 1
PD = 5
Ghosting
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 32
Application Example – Material
Formulation
Use of ECD-DRA in Roller Materials Development
0.1
1
10
100
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
Time (sec)
Ro
lle
r E
CD
Vo
ltag
e (
vo
lt) Old Formulation
New Formulation A
New Formulation B
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 33
New
Application Example – Roller Aging
6
14
10
18
V
Used
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 34
Development Roller
A cut in the roller
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
ITB – Failure Analysis
35
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (sec)
Vo
lta
ge
(V
) Bad-new
Good-used
Good-new
Bad-used
First data points V(0):
Low for good,
high for bad
same for new and used
intrinsic charge
Voltage decay V(t):
Fast for new
Slow for used
injected charge
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
ITB - Benchmarking
36
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Summary
Performance of EP sub-processes using
rollers and belts is controlled by
dielectric relaxation (DR) of semi-
insulating (SI) layer
Dielectric relaxation induced by charge
injection from bias voltage
Full relaxation of SI often requires time
longer than available in high speed
Electrophotography
37
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Conclusions
Electrical characterization of rollers and
belts should emphasize transient values
& spatial variations in DR
Observations of spatial averages, at fully
relaxed states are insufficient
Open-circuit voltage measurements,
efficiently scanning large area of sample
– an extremely valuable tool for R&D, QC
and failure analysis
38
NIP 24 September 2008, Pittsburgh, PA
Ming-Kai Tse and Inan Chen Quality Engineering Associates (QEA), Inc.
Burlington, MA USA
Please visit: www.qea.com
See you in the Exhibit Hall
39
Thank you for your attention