egdt
DESCRIPTION
kuliahTRANSCRIPT
-
What the best for EGDT: What the best for EGDT: ScvO2, Lactate or BE?
-
Sepsis: Defining a Disease Continuum
A clinical response arising from a nonspecific insult, including
Temperature oC or oC
HR Respirations 20/min WBC count 12,000/mm3 or4,000/mm3immature neutrophils
SIRS = Systemic InflammatoryResponse Syndrome
SIRS plus/with a presumed or confirmed infectious process
SepsisSepsisSIRSSIRSInfection/Infection/Trauma/shockTrauma/shock Severe SepsisSevere Sepsis
Adapted from: Bone RC, et al. Chest 1992;101:1644Opal SM, et al. Crit Care Med 2000;28:S81
-
Sepsis: Defining a Disease Continuum
Bone et al. Chest 1992;101:1644; Wheeler and Bernard. N Engl J Med 1999;340:207
SepsisSepsisSIRSSIRSInfection/Infection/Trauma/shockTrauma/shock Severe SepsisSevere Sepsis
Sepsis with 1 sign of organ failureCardiovascular (refractory
hypotension)RenalRespiratoryHepaticHematologicCNSMetabolic acidosis
Septic Septic ShockShock
-
Initial Resuscitation
Diagnosis Antibiotic therapy Source Control Fluid therapy Vasopressors Inotropic Therapy Steroids Recombinant
Human Activated Protein C (rhAPC)[drotrecogin alfa(activated)]
Blood Product Administration Mechanical Ventilation Sedation, Analgesia, and
Neuromuscular Blockade in Sepsis
Glucose Control Renal Replacement Bicarbonate Therapy Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Limitation of Support
Index
Dellinger, et. al. Crit Care Med 2004, 32: 858-873.
-
49.2%
33.3%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Standard Therapyn=133
EGDTn=130
P = 0.01*
*Key difference was in sudden CV collapse, not MODS
28-day Mortality
Rivers E. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368-77.
Early Goal-Directed Therapy Results
-
DEFINITION
SHOCK
The total body cellular metabolism is malfunctional, usually secondary to decreased delivery of oxygen to meet cellular needs and on occasions due to the inability of cells to utilize oxygen.
-
ShockClinical syndrome result from inadequate
tissue perfusion, often complicated by the cellular metabolic dysfunction
MODS (Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome)MOFS (Multiple Organ Failure Syndrome)
Inadequate O2 delivery
Cellular injuryInflammatory mediators
-
DO2 = C.O x CaO2DO2 = C.O x Hb x Sa O2 +
dissolved O2
StrokeVolume
Preload
After load
Contractility Cardiac Output
Heart Rate
RhythmPassive complianceIntravasc. VolumeRelaxation
Aortic impedancePeriph. Vasc.Resist
-
Regional blood flow distribution in a 70kg healthy normal volunteer at rest
Organ
Kidney
Liver/GIT
Heart
Brain
Muscle
Skin
Organ size (kg)
0.3
1.5
0.3
1.4
2.5
30
Blood flow(l/min)
1.2
1.4
0.25
0.75
0.2
0.9
Blood flow(l/kg/min)
4.0
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.08
0.03
CO (%)
20 25
25 30
5
15
4
45
-
EGDT Inclusion criteria: two of SIRS criteria
SBP
-
EGDT for 6 hoursstandard th/ n = 133 EGDT th/ n = 130
CVP 8 12 mmHg, MAP 65 90mmHg, Urine 0.5cc/kg/hr, ScvO2 70%, SaO293%, Ht30%
BE ?Lactate ?
N Engl J M 2001; 345:1368 - 77
-
6 hrs after EGDTstandard vs EGDT
CVP increase MAP increase ScvO2 increase Lactate decrease Base deficit decrease pH increase APACHE II decrease SAP II decrease MODS
Hematocrit Prothrombin Time Partial thrombpl.Time Fibrinogen FDP D.Dimer Platelet count
N Engl J M 2001; 345:1368 - 77
-
Mortality and cause of in-hospital death
Standard Th/ EGDT PvalueVariable
In hospital mortality
All patient 59 (46.5) 38(30.5) 0.009Pts with severe sepsis 19 (30.0) 9 (14.9) 0.06Pts with septic shock 40 (56.8) 29 (42.3) 0.04Pts with sepsis syndrome 44(45.4) 35 (35.1) 0.07
no. (%)
28-day mortality 61(49.2) 40 (33.3) 0.0160-day mortality 70(56.9) 50(44.3) 0.03
Causes of in-hospital death
Sudden cardiovascular collaps 25/119 (21.0) 12/117 (10.3) 0.02Multiorgan failure 26/119 (21.8) 19/117(16.2) 0.27
N Engl J M 2001; 345:1368 - 77
-
Hemodynamicparameters-Preload (CVP, PCWP)-Afterload (MAP, SVR)-Contractility (SV)-Heart rate (BPM)-Shock index (HR/SBP)-Coronary perfusion pressure
DO2 parameter-PaO2-Hemoglobin-Cardiac output
Upstream endpoints of Resuscitation
GOAL- directed Therapy
MICROCIRCULATION
-
Down streammarkers of the effectiveness ofresuscitation
SvO2SvO2
LactateLactate
Base DeficitBase Deficit
(a (a v)CO2v)CO2
MediatorsMediators
PslCO2PslCO2
pHipHi
-
Number of publications on regarding microcirculation in humans
-
Schematic depiction of global circulation and microcirculatory blood flow in different organ systems with organ specific oxygen consumption and flow (VO & Q)1-3.
Systemic afterload could be interpreted as microvascularpreload, while systemic preload could be thought of as microvascular afterload.
Specific vasoactivemedication can be chosen to modulate microvascularperfusion.
SvO2DO2
PO2SaO2
ScvO2
SvO2(2)
SvO2(3)
SvO2(1)
-
SvO2
-
SvO2 SvO2 lowSvO2 low
ExerciseStressAnxiety
Hypoxemia
Heart failure
Hypovolemia
VO2 (N)VO2 (N)VO2 highVO2 high
CO lowCO lowCO highCO high
Increase O2ER
SaO2 lowSaO2 low SaO2 (N)SaO2 (N)
High PAOP /PE
High PAOP
Low PAOP
Anemia
Obstruction
CCM 2002; 30:2380-1
-
Carbohydrate metabolism
Acetyl CoA
Glucose
NAD+ NADH + H+
ATP ADP
Lactate
ATP ADP
Pyruvate
Phosphoenol-pyruvate2-Phosphoglycerate
3 Phosphoglycerate 1,3 Biphosphoglycerate
Glyceraldehyde 3-P
F 1,6PF-6PGlucose-6PATP ADP
ADP ATP
PDH
CO2 + H2O + 36 ATP
NADH NAD+
LDH
AnaerobicTCA cycle(Aerobic)
-
Lactate metabolism
Produced by: RBC, Skin, Brain, Skeletal muscle, Renal medulla, Intestinal mucosa, Other tissues
In general the level is less than 2mmol/L Daily production : 1500mmol/L Metabolized in the liver (60%) (Cori cycle)
in the cortex of kidney (30%) (neoglucogenesis)
The renal threshold excretion is 5 6 mmol/L
-
GlucoseGlucose
652 kcal673 kcal
(Gluconeogenesis)(Oxidation)
2 Lactate2 Lactate2 Pyruvate
(Oxidation)
Glucose
Alkalosis
AnoxiaEndotoxin
Thiamine Deficiency
+ 47 kcal
Lactate Shuttle
-
Causes of hyperlactatemia
Type A : Imbalance between O2 demand and Supply*Shock*Severe hypoxemia, CO poisoning*Severe anemia, excessive increase in O2 demand (seizure, hyperpyrexia, shivering, strenuous exercise)
Type B : Metabolic derangements
-
Causes of hyperlactatemia
Type B : Metabolic derangements* Cancer (tumor production or liver metastasis)* Liver failure* Cyanide poisoning* Alkalosis* Sepsis* Beta-2 agonist* Ketoacidosis* Vitamin deficiency: thiamine, biotine* Ethanol intoxication* Metformin* Inborn error of metabolism
-
Lactic acidosis Hyperlactatemia
A build up of lactic acid (lactatemia > 5 mmol/L) and metabolic acidosis (pH
-
Cori cycle(lactate glucose in the liver)
LIVER
MUSCLE
RBC
Beta-oxidation of FFA
2ATP
2ATP
2Lactate
6ATP 6ATP 6ADP6ADP
Blood lactate
Blood glucose
Glycogen
Glycolysis
2Lactate
Glucose
2Lactate2Lactate
GluconeogenesisGluconeogenesis
GlucoseGlucose
BLOOD
-
BE is the amount of base in millimolerequired to titrate 1 L of whole arterial blood to a pH of 7.40 with the sample fully saturated with oxygen at 37 C and a PaCO2 of 40mmHg
Mild : - 3 to 5 mmol/LModerate: - 6 to 14 mmol/LSevere: - 15 mmol/L
-
pH 6.10 + log HCO3-
PCO2 X 0.030=
BE caused by free water effect (BEfw)= 0.3 X (Na 140)
BE caused by changes in chloride (BEcl)= 102 - Clcor
Clcor = corrected chloride = Cl X 140/Na
-
BE caused by changes in albumin (BEalb)= 3.4 X (4.5 albumin)
BE net calculated from standard bicarbonate= BEfw + BEcl + BEalb + BEua
BE caused by unmeasured anions (BEua)= BE net (BEfw + BEcl +Bealb)
-
EVOLUTIVE STANDARD BASE EXCESS AND SERUM LACTATE LEVEL IN SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTICSHOCK PATIENTS RESUSCITATED WITH EARLY GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY: STILL OUTCOMEMARKERS?
CLINICS 2006; 6 (1): 47 - 52
-
A retrospective study 65 cases Severe sepsis and septic shock Fluid resuscitation, inotropics, vasopressors ScvO2 70% SBE and lactate arterial blood Blood sample collected 6 hourly (first 24hr) ScvO2, lactate serum, SBE compared between
survivors and non-survivors during the first 5 days.
40 survivors and 25non-survivors
-
Characteristic All patients Survivor vs Nonsurvivor Pvalue
Age yrs Gender(female) (%) APACHE II * Days in ICU* ARDS no.(%) Mech.Ventilation no.(%) Dialysis no.(%) Septic Shock no.(%) Severe sepsis no.(%)
Sepsis sourcePneumonia no (%) Abdominal no (%) Urinary tract no (%) Soft tissue no(%) Catheter no (%) Unidentified no (%)
n=65 n=40 n=25
54 (33,69)28 (43)24(16,27)10(6,13)25(38)57(88)5(8)50(77)15(23)
41(27,61)20(50)21(12,25)10(6,13)16(40)32(80)2(5)28(70)12(30)
67(51,63)8(32)26(18,30)9(7,16)9(36)25(100)3(12)22(88)3(12)
40(62)10(16)5(8)4(6)3(4)3(4)
24(60)6(14)3(8)2(5)3(8)2(5)
16(64)4(16)2(8)2(8)0(0)1(4)
.99>.99.64.28
>.99
-
* Between groups there were difference in day 2, 3, 4 and 5
ScvO2
-
* Between groups there were difference in day 2, 3, 4 and 5
ScvO2
survivor
non survivor
-
# Within group showing differences between the days 3,4 5 vs day 1 amongthe survivor. * Between groups there was difference in day 5
SBE
-
* Between groups there was difference in day 2
Lactate
-
Evolutive SBE and serum lactate level are still considered to be outcome markers in septic patients treated with EGDT during their ICU stay.
-
Intensive Care Med (2001) 27 : 74 - 83
-
148 ICU cases (unselected)St Georges Hospital General ICU London
Prospective study BE and lactate level of arterial blood on admission and
and at 24h. Data in absolut numbers, medians with a range or
percentages 28 day mortality
mortality %n n
Medical causes 70 33 47Elective surgery 53 8 15Emergency surgery 25 10 40
17 pts passed away within 24 hrs
-
ROC for lactate
-
ROC for BE
-
AgeSex (M:F)BELactateSOFA on admissionSOFA at 24hrsAcute Renal F(%)Inotropes(%)MVent (%)Mortality(%)
68(21-91)37:26-8,1(-27.9-4.1)2.5(0.5- -4.1)5(0-14)6(0-16)22(34.9)11(17.4)44(69.8)36(57.1)
64(19-89)50:350.3 (-4-11.9)0.7(0.1-10.3)3(0-11)3(0-12)4(4.7)6(7.1)52(61.2)15(17.6)
*
****
*
*
Admission BE < - 4
Yes(n=63) No(n=85) *p
-
Admission lactate >1.5
Yes (n=57) No(n=91)
AgeSex(M:F)Base ExcessLactateSOFA on admissionSOFA at 24hrsAcute renal F(%)Inotropes(%)Mech.Ventilation (%)Mortality(%)
69(20-91)35:22-7.7(-27.9-11.7)2.9(1.6-15.4)4.5(0-14)5(0-16)9(15.7)20(35.1)41(71.9)35(61.4)
63(19-91)52:39-1.1(-14.8- 11.9)0.7(0.1-1.5)3(0-9)3(0-11)6(6.6)8(8.8)55(60.4)16(17.6)
******
*
*p< 0.05
24 lactate>1.0 24 lactate>1.0
Yes No Yes NoN at 24 hrs 27 21 16 67
Mortality(%) 22(81.5) 5(23.8)* 6(37.5) 8(11.9)*
- Admission BE1.5Yes(n=81) No(n=67) *p
-
In patients whose BE decreased to greater than -2.5mmol/L and the lactate to less than 1.0mmol/l the mortality was less than 7%
If a patient on a general ward is able to demonstrate an improvement in these markers over the time, it takes to be assessed for admission to a higher level of care,admission is unnecessary as the prognosis will be good whatever the ultimate therapeutic strategy employed.
-
Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1637 - 1642
-
Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock
Prospective observational study Inclusion criteria; adult, ED, severe sepsis or septic
shock, a suspected sepsis source andA) two of four SIRS criteria and SBP 4mmol/L)
Exclusion criteria:
-
Lactate clearance was defined as the decrease in lactate from emergency department presentation to 6 hour
Lactate clearance
Lactate
LactateLactate
ED Presentation
ED Presentation
Hour 6___=
X 100
A positive value : a decrease or clearance of lactateA negative value : an increase in lactate after 6hrs of ED intervention
-
Septic Shock,%Platelet, permm3Prothrombin time, secsAlbumin, g/dLTotal bilirubin, mg/dLLactate, mmol/LLactate clearance,%
39.1224.000119.00014.7 3.03.0 0.71.3 2.26.1 4.438.1 34.6
70.2177,000 97,00019.2 8.32.6 0.73.0 4.18.0 4.712.0 51.6
.001
.03
-
Multivariate logistic regression modeling using statistically significant univariate variables associated with mortality
Septic shockPlateletProthrombin timeAlbuminTotal bilirubinLactateLactate clearance
2.473 (0.927 6.600)0.999 (0.994 1.004)1.140 (0.988 1.315)0.569 (0.267 1.212)1.045 (0.855 1.276)1.057 (0.945 1.182)0.989 (0.978 0.999)
.07
.69
.07
.14
.67
.34
.04
Variable OR(95% CI) p Value
p
- Low lactate cl
-
Low lactate cl10% (n = 80) P Value
Therapy
-
P ValueLow lactate cl10% (n = 80)
Outcome
-
Outcome
In-hospital mortality rate, %30-day mortality rate, %60-day mortality rate, %
Severe sepsis, %Lactate, mmol/LIn-hospital mortality rate,%
Septic shock, %Lactate, mmol/LIn-hospital mortality rate,%
67.767.771.0
29.04.8 2.955.6
71.07.9 6.472.7
32.537.542.5
55.06.4 3.820.5
45.07.5 4.547.2
-
International Consensus Conference, Paris (27 28 April 2006): Hemodynamic monitoring in
shock and implications for management
International Consensus Conference, Paris (27 28 April 2006): Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management
Grading system of recommendationL1 (Level 1) : strong recommendationL2 (Level 2): weak recommendation
Quality of Evidence (QoE)High (grade-A)Moderate (grade-B)Low (grade-C)Very low (grade-D)
-
Question 1 : What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the ICU?
1. We recommend that shock be defined as a life threatening, generalized maldistribution of blood flow resulting in failure to deliver and/or utilize adequate amounts of oxygen, leading to tissue dysoxia ( L1 : B)
2. We recommend that hypotension (SBP
-
Question 1 : What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the ICU?
3. In the absence of hypotension, when shock is suggested by history and physical examination, we recommend that a marker of inadequate perfusion be measured (decrease ScvO2, SvO2, increase blood lactate, increase base deficit, perfusion-related low pH) (L 1: B)
4. Apart from lactate and base deficit, current evidence does not support the routine use of biomarkers for diagnosis or staging of shock.(L 1: A)
-
Question 1 : What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the ICU?
5. We recommend a target blood pressure during initial shock resuscitation of: For uncontrolled hemorrhage due to trauma: MAP of 40mmHg until bleeding is surgically controlled (L1 : B)For traumatic brain injury (TBI) without systemic hemorrhage: MAP of 90mmHg (L1 :C)For all other shock states : MAP>65mmHg.(L1 : B)
-
Question 4: What markers of the regional and microcirculation can be monitored and how
can cellular function can be assessed in shock?
1. We suggest serial measurements of lactates and/or base deficit as a predictor of outcome. (L2:B)
2. We do not recommend routine use of gastric tonometry, sublingual capnography, orthogonal polarization spectral (OPS) imaging and other techniques to assess regional or micro-circulation (L1:B)
-
Question 5 : What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct therapy in
shock?2. We do not recommend the routine use of the
pulmonary artery catheter for patients in shock (L1: A)
3. We recommend instituting goal-directed therapy without delay, in patients presenting with septic shock (within 6 h or ideally less), particularly where ScvO2 is below 70% (L1:B)
4. We do not recommend targeting supranormal oxygen delivery in patients with shock (L1:A)
-
Question 5 : What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct
therapy in shock?
5. a). We recommend frequent measurement of blood pressure and physical examination variables (including signs of hypoperfusion, urine output, and mental status) in patients with history and clinical findings suggestive of shock.b). We recommend invasive blood pressure measurement in refractory shock (L1 : D)
-
Summary EGDT should not be done late on ED/general ward. ScvO2 should be assessed carefully. The value is higher
than SvO2 (mixed venous) Evolutive BE and serum lactate level within five days can
be considered as outcome markers in severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated with EGDT
BE higher than -2.5mmol/L and lactate less than 1mmol/L as cut off value of good ourcome.
BEua should be considered in critically ill setting. Early lactate clearance, more than 10% within 6 hrs ,can
be consider as a marker of outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitated with EGDT
-
Thank You
-
Patients demographic and clinical characteristics, by BE at admission and after 24h
BE at adm
ission < -4m
mol/L
BE at 24 h
-
Patients demographic and clinical characteristics, by lactate level at admission and after 24h
Lactate at admission >1.5 mmol/L mortality 61.4% 1.5 mmol/L 17.6%
Lactate at 24h > 1.0 mmol/L 81.5% 1.0mmol/L 23.8%