efficacy and safety of a 52-week, randomized, double-blind

18
Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Ruxolitinib Cream for the Treatment of Vitiligo 1 John E. Harris, MD, PhD, 1 Amit G. Pandya, MD , 2 Mark Lebwohl, MD, 3 Pearl Grimes, MD, 4 Iltefat Hamzavi, MD, 5 Alice B. Gottlieb, MD, PhD, 6 Kathleen Butler, MD, 7 Fiona Kuo, PhD, 7 Kang Sun, PhD, 7 David Rosmarin, MD 8 1 University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA; 2 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; 3 Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA; 4 The Vitiligo & Pigmentation Institute of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 5 Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA; 6 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 7 Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA; 8 Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA Presented at the 28th European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress October 9−13, 2019; Madrid, Spain

Upload: others

Post on 24-Oct-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized,

Double-Blind Trial of Ruxolitinib Cream for the

Treatment of Vitiligo

1

John E. Harris, MD, PhD,1 Amit G. Pandya, MD,2 Mark Lebwohl, MD,3 Pearl Grimes, MD,4

Iltefat Hamzavi, MD,5 Alice B. Gottlieb, MD, PhD,6 Kathleen Butler, MD,7 Fiona Kuo, PhD,7

Kang Sun, PhD,7 David Rosmarin, MD8

1University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA; 2University of Texas Southwestern Medical

Center, Dallas, TX, USA; 3Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA; 4The Vitiligo & Pigmentation Institute of

Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 5Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA; 6Icahn School of

Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; 7Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA; 8Tufts Medical Center,

Boston, MA, USA

Presented at the 28th European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress

October 9−13, 2019; Madrid, Spain

Page 2: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Presenting Author Disclosures

• Investigator for Aclaris Therapeutics, Immune Tolerance Network, Incyte

Corporation, and Pfizer

• Consultant for Incyte Corporation and Pfizer

• Board member who also holds stock options for Clarify Medical

2

Page 3: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

JAK-Targeted Therapy for Vitiligo

3

CD, cluster of differentiation; CXCL, chemokine ligand; CXCR, chemokine receptor; IFN, interferon; JAK, Janus kinase; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription;

T-bet, T-box–containing protein.

1. Taïeb A and Picardo M. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(2):160-169; 2. Morrison B, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(6):e338-e339; 3. Rashighi M and Harris JE. Ann Transl Med.

2015;3(21):343; 4. Quintas-Cardama A, et al. Blood. 2010;115(15):3109-3117; 5. Rosmarin D, et al. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of vitiligo: results of a

24-week, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, vehicle-controlled study. Presented at: World Congress of Dermatology 2019.

• Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease that targets

melanocytes, resulting in patches of skin depigmentation1

and reduced quality of life2

• Disease pathogenesis is driven by signaling through

JAK1/JAK23

• A cream formulation of ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor,4

is under investigation for the treatment of vitiligo

• Ruxolitinib cream provided significant repigmentation of

facial vitiligo lesions after 24 weeks of double-blind,

vehicle-controlled treatment (NCT03099304)5

• Objective: To further investigate the therapeutic potential

of ruxolitinib cream in patients with vitiligo after 52 weeks

of double-blind treatment

Page 4: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Study Design

BID, twice daily; F-VASI, facial Vitiligo Area Scoring Index; NB-UVB, narrow-band ultraviolet light B; QD, once daily.

4

* Rerandomization to 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, or 1.5% BID at Week 24 for vehicle group.† Rerandomization to 0.5% QD, 1.5% QD, or 1.5% BID if <25% improvement in F-VASI at Week 24.‡ Patients were offered concurrent NB-UVB phototherapy.

Vehicle*

BID

0.5%

QD

1.5%

QD

1.5%

BID

All Groups

1.5%

BID‡

Screening

(up to 4 weeks)Double-Blind

(24 weeks) (28 weeks)Open-Label

(52 weeks)Follow-Up

(97 days)

0.15%†

QD

Vitiligo

Men and women

aged 18‒75

years

(n=157)

equally

randomized

Re

ran

do

miz

ati

on

Page 5: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Study Endpoints

• Primary Endpoint

– Proportion of patients treated with ruxolitinib cream who achieved a ≥50%

improvement from baseline in F-VASI (F-VASI50) at Week 24 compared with

patients treated with vehicle

• Secondary Endpoints

– Proportion of patients achieving ≥50% improvement from baseline in T-VASI

(T-VASI50) at Week 52

– Proportion of patients who achieved a F-PhGVA of clear (no signs of vitiligo) or

almost clear (only specks of depigmentation present) at Week 24

– Safety and tolerability

5

F-PhGVA, facial Physician Global Vitiligo Assessment; T-VASI, total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index.

Page 6: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Eligibility Criteria

• Key Inclusion Criteria

– Patients aged 18–75 years with clinical diagnosis of vitiligo

– Depigmented areas including both of the following

• ≥0.5% of total BSA on the face

• ≥3% of total BSA on nonfacial areas

• Key Exclusion Criteria

– Dermatologic disease confounding vitiligo assessment

– Use of any biological or experimental therapy for vitiligo within 12 weeks of screening

– Use of phototherapy within 8 weeks of screening

– Use of immunomodulating treatments within 4 weeks of screening

– Previous JAK inhibitor therapy

6

BSA, body surface area.

Page 7: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Patient Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

7

Demographics and Clinical

Characteristics

Total

(N=157)

Age, mean ± SD, years 48.3±12.9

Men, n (%) 73 (46.5)

White, n (%) 132 (84.1)

Skin type, n (%)

I 6 (3.8)

II 50 (31.8)

III 50 (31.8)

IV 31 (19.7)

V 10 (6.4)

VI 10 (6.4)

Clinical Characteristics

Total

(N=157)

Baseline F-VASI, mean ± SD 1.26±0.82

Baseline T-VASI, mean ± SD 18.0±15.5

Facial BSA,* mean ± SD, % 1.48±0.86

Total BSA, mean ± SD, % 22.1±18.4

Duration of disease, median (range), years 14.0 (0.3–67.9)

Diagnosed in childhood,† n (%) 35 (22.3)

Other autoimmune disorders,‡ n (%) 42 (26.8)

Prior therapy, n (%)

Topical corticosteroids 72 (45.9)

Calcineurin inhibitors 70 (44.6)

Phototherapy 55 (35.0)

* Percentage of total BSA; † Data missing from 1 patient in the 1.5% BID group; ‡ Including patients (n [%]) with thyroid disorders (39 [24.8]), juvenile diabetes mellitus (2 [1.3]),

and pernicious anemia (1 [0.6]).

• Distribution of baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar across treatment groups

Page 8: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

F-VASI50 Response

8

Error bars indicate standard error.

* P<0.05 vs vehicle at Week 24; ** P<0.01 vs vehicle at Week 24; *** P<0.001 vs vehicle at Week 24.

• At Week 24, F-VASI50 was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving ruxolitinib

cream (25.8%–50.0% across doses) vs vehicle (3.1%)

• At Week 52, the proportion of patients achieving an F-VASI50 response was highest in the 1.5% BID

group

3.10

3.1

16.119.4

32.3

12.9

22.625.8

38.7

48.4

13.3

20.0

50.0 50.0

43.3

9.1

21.2

45.5

51.5

57.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Week 8 Week 12 Week 24 Week 34 Week 52

Vehicle (n=32)0.15% QD (n=31)0.5% QD (n=31)1.5% QD (n=30)1.5% BID (n=33)

F-V

AS

I50

Re

sp

on

se

, %

**

*

******

Double-Blind Vehicle-Controlled Double-Blind

Page 9: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

F-VASI75 and F-VASI90 Responses

9

• At Week 52, the proportions of patients achieving F-VASI75 and F-VASI90 responses were highest in

the 1.5% BID group

Error bars indicate standard error.

0

9.7

16.1

29.0

16.7

30.030.3

51.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Week 24 Week 52

F-VASI75Vehicle (n=32)0.15% QD (n=31)0.5% QD (n=31)1.5% QD (n=30)1.5% BID (n=33)

F-V

AS

I75

Res

po

nse

, %

03.2

9.7

19.4

13.3 13.312.1

33.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Week 24 Week 52

F-VASI90Vehicle (n=32)0.15% QD (n=31)0.5% QD (n=31)1.5% QD (n=30)1.5% BID (n=33)

F-V

AS

I90

Re

sp

on

se

, %

Page 10: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

T-VASI50 Response

10

Error bars indicate standard error.

* T-VASI50 response is reported for the subset of patients with baseline total BSA ≤20% because treatment was limited to lesions constituting ≤20% of total BSA.

• T-VASI50 at Week 52 was achieved by patients in a dose-dependent manner

• Among patients who treated all depigmented skin (baseline total BSA ≤20%), T-VASI50 response was

45.0% with the 1.5% BID regimen at Week 52

0

16.1

6.5

25.823.3

30.0

12.1

36.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Week 24 Week 52

All Patients (N=157)Vehicle (n=32)0.15% QD (n=31)0.5% QD (n=31)1.5% QD (n=30)1.5% BID (n=33)

T-V

AS

I50

Res

po

nse

, %

0

18.2

10.0

25.0

31.6

36.8

20.0

45.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Week 24 Week 52

Vehicle (n=19)0.15% QD (n=22)0.5% QD (n=20)1.5% QD (n=19)1.5% BID (n=20)

T-V

AS

I50

Re

sp

on

se

, %

Patients With Baseline Total BSA ≤20% (n=100)*

Page 11: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Clinical Images Showing F-VASI ResponseRuxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID

11

Day 1 Week 24 Week 52

F-VASI: 1.13 F-VASI: 0.13 F-VASI: 0.13

% Change in F-VASI

from baseline, 89%

% Change in F-VASI

from baseline, 89%

Page 12: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Clinical Images Showing F-VASI ResponseRuxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID

12

Day 1 Week 24 Week 52

F-VASI: 0.63 F-VASI: 0.45 F-VASI: 0.15

% Change in F-VASI

from baseline, 76%

% Change in F-VASI

from baseline, 29%

Page 13: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Clinical Images Showing F-VASI ResponseVehicle Rerandomized to Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD After Week 24

13

Day 1 Week 24 Week 52Vehicle 1.5% QD

F-VASI: 2.50 F-VASI: 2.50 F-VASI: 0.18

% Change in F-VASI

from baseline, 93%

% Change in F-VASI

from baseline, 0%

Page 14: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Clinical Images Showing T-VASI ResponseRuxolitinib Cream 1.5% QD

14

Day 1 Week 24 Week 52

Page 15: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Clinical Images Showing T-VASI ResponseRuxolitinib Cream 1.5% BID

15

Day 1 Week 24 Week 52

Page 16: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

F-PhGVA of Clear or Almost Clear

16

• The proportion of patients who attained F-PhGVA scores of clear or almost clear at Week 24 increased

by Week 52

Error bars indicate standard error.

* No patients had F-PhGVA values of clear or almost clear at baseline.

0 00

3.23.2

9.7

19.4

3.3

13.313.3

3.0

9.1

21.2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Week 12 Week 24 Week 52

Vehicle (n=32)0.15% QD (n=31)0.5% QD (n=31)1.5% QD (n=30)1.5% BID (n=33)

Pa

tie

nts

Ac

hie

vin

g F

-Ph

GV

A

of

Cle

ar

or

Alm

os

t C

lea

r, %

*

Page 17: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

SafetyTEAEs Through 52 Weeks

17

Week 24 Week 52

Ruxolitinib Cream

Parameter, n (%)Vehicle

(n=32)

0.15% QD

(n=31)

0.5% QD

(n=31)

1.5% QD

(n=30)

1.5% BID

(n=33)

Patients with TEAE 20 (62.5) 20 (64.5) 26 (83.9) 23 (76.7) 23 (76.7)

Most common TEAEs*

Acne 1 (3.1) 4 (12.9) 5 (16.1) 3 (10.0) 6 (18.2)

Pruritus 3 (9.4) 1 (3.2) 5 (16.1) 4 (13.3) 3 (9.1)

Upper respiratory tract infection 0 1 (3.2) 5 (16.1) 1 (3.3) 3 (9.1)

Headache 3 (9.4) 1 (3.2) 0 3 (10.0) 2 (6.1)

Sinusitis 1 (3.1) 2 (6.5) 1 (3.2) 2 (6.7) 2 (6.1)

Viral upper respiratory tract infection 5 (15.6) 3 (9.7) 3 (9.7) 6 (20.0) 1 (3.0)

Application site pruritus 3 (9.4) 6 (19.4) 3 (9.7) 3 (10.0) 1 (3.0)

Patients with treatment-related TEAE 12 (37.5) 11 (35.5) 12 (38.7) 12 (40.0) 10 (30.3)

Patients with TEAE leading to discontinuation† 1 (3.1) 1 (3.2)‡ 0 1 (3.3) 0

Patients with serious TEAE§ 0 0 2 (6.5) 1 (3.3) 1 (3.0)

TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.

* Occurring in >5% of the total patient population; † TEAEs leading to discontinuation were not related to treatment unless otherwise indicated; ‡ Headache related to treatment; § No serious TEAEs were related to treatment.

• Ruxolitinib cream was not associated with clinically significant application site reactions or serious

treatment-related adverse events

Page 18: Efficacy and Safety of a 52-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind

Conclusions

• Ruxolitinib cream monotherapy produced substantial facial and total body

repigmentation of vitiligo lesions after Week 24

• Continued improvement was seen through 52 weeks of treatment (highest

responses with 1.5% BID), suggesting that ruxolitinib cream is an effective

treatment option for patients with vitiligo

• A longer duration of therapy was associated with greater repigmentation, as

objectively assessed using the VASI

– Near-complete facial repigmentation as assessed by F-VASI75

– Substantial total body repigmentation as assessed by T-VASI50

• All doses of ruxolitinib cream were well tolerated, and no treatment-related

serious AEs were reported

18