effects of media and destination image on the behavioral …ijthr.or.kr/xml/10844/10844.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Ⅰ. Introduction
Many studies seeking to explain the decision-making
process of tourists’ behaviors have considered the
destination image as one of the most important elements in
tourist destination decision-making. It seems that a tourist
destination’s image plays a great role in the travel
decision-making process. In other words, potential tourists
tend to visit the destination regardless of the distance and/or
cost in order to realize the expectation or fantasy of the
* This research is supported by Hwacheon gun.
** Assistant professor, Department of Global Tourism Management,
Shinhan University, email: [email protected]
*** Professor, Graduate School of Tourism, Kyung Hee University,
email: [email protected]
† (Corresponding author) Associate Professor, Department of
Hotel & Convention Management, PaiChai University, e-mail:
destination. There are several studies on the influence of
tourist destination image on tourist’s behavior (Baloglu,
2000; Baloglu & McCleary, 1999; Han & Hyun, 2015;
Milman & Pizam, 1995). Particularly, several studies have
dealt with the influence of image on tourists’ destination
preference or intention to visit (Chen & Kerstetter, 1999;
Leisen, 2001). Thus, developing a favorable image can be a
key strategy for successful tourism destination (Dadgostar
& Isotalo, 1992). One of the key elements in forming the
tourist destination’s before-image is information delivered
by various media (Frias et al., 2008). Tourists develop
expectations, fantasies, or images of destinations through
advertisements, media exposure, word of mouth, and actual
visits (Urray, 2002). Recently, media focused on tourist
destinations have been diversified due to the rapid growth
of online information, such as personal blogs and other
social media. Television channels and newspapers are also
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality ResearchVolume 31, Number 4, pp. 27-41, 2017 ISSN(Print): 1738-3005Homepage: http://www.ktra.or.kr DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21298/IJTHR.2017.4.31.4.27
Effects of media and destination image on the behavioral intention to visit Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival*
Juyeon Kim**⋅Kyungmo Ahn***⋅Hakjun Song†2)
Department of Global Tourism Management, Shinhan University, Uijeongbu 11644, Republic of Korea
Graduate School of Tourism, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
Department of Hotel & Convention Management, PaiChai University, DaeJeon, 35345, Republic of Korea
AbstractAfter Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival was introduced as one of 7 Wonders of Winter on CNN America’s website
in 2011, the festival has been covered by various media. The media effect brought an increase in visitors to HIF. This study aims to understand the festival visitors’ destination image according to the exposed media information, attitude, and behavioral intention by adopting the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior (ETPB) including additional constructs such as media information and destination image. An on-site survey was conducted among 423 visitors attending the festival from January 21 to January 27, 2013. A total of 451 questionnaires were used for empirical analysis. The survey results revealed that both media information and three aspects of the festival’s image (cognitive, affective, and unique) indirectly influenced the festival visitors’ behavioral intention. Specifically, media information had a significant influence on all three aspects of the image, and it had the greatest influence on the unique image. Affective image and unique image significantly affected festival visitors’ attitude. Although attitude and subjective norm had significant effects on behavioral intention to attend the festival, perceived behavioral control and frequency of past behavior was statistically insignificant on behavioral intention. Based on these research results, theoretical importance and practical implications are discussed in this paper.
Key words: Media effects, Destination image (cognitive, affective, and unique image), Extended theory of planned behavior, Decision-making process
28 Effects of media and destination image on the behavioral intention to visit Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival
able to cause a remarkable change in a destination’s image
due to their high credibility and ability to reach mass
audiences (Gartner & Shen, 1992). In particular, news
media has a great impact on image formation when it
reports about a distant country or depicts a dramatic event
(Castelltort & Mäder, 2010). The scene of thousands of
people enjoying various activities on ice at Hwacheon
Sancheoneo Ice Festival (hereafter HIF), the subject of this
study, is enough to draw interest around the world. HIF is a
winter festival that takes place in a remote and isolated
location, 140 kilometers from Seoul, the capital of South
Korea (hereafter Korea). This unique festival enables
travelers to enjoy various winter activities; for instance,
visitors can catch mountain trout by either drilling an ice
hole in a lake or by walking into an icy water pool to catch
the fish with their bare hands. They also can enjoy various
winter activities including bobsledding, skating, and snow
sledding.
CNN America’s website introduced HIF as one of 7
Wonders of Winter through its travel section on December
1st, 2011. This image has spread through domestic and
international media, and HIF has been covered by domestic
TV news programs, newsletters, magazines, and travel-
related websites. As a consequence of the extensive media
coverage, the number of visitors to HIF has increased from
1.33 million in 2010 to 1.44 million in 2012 and finally to
1.5 million in 2013, 1.4 million in 2014, 1.5 million in
2015~2017. Based on the research dealing with the media's
influence on destination image, extensive media coverage
of HIF is hypothesized to influence travelers’ image,
attitude, and visiting behavior (Castelltort & Mäder, 2010;
Frias et al., 2008; Urray, 2002). In this regard, the current
study analyzed the influence of media coverage on the
festival's image and identified the decision-making process
of festival visitors. In order to achieve its research goal, this
study extended the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), one
of the most widely-adopted theories, by adding the
influence of media coverage to the original TPB. From the
theoretical point of view, the findings of this study are
expected to enhance the understanding of media’s effects on
destination image and tourist behaviors. From the practical
point of view, the study’s results will provide festival
managers and marketers with viable media marketing
strategies to attract more tourists to HIF.
Figure 1. View of Hwacheon Ice Festival
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 31(4), 2017 29
Ⅱ. Literature review
1. TPB and ETPB
It has been shown that tourists’ behavioral intention to
visit festivals, since it is closely related to actual festival
visiting behavior, is key both to understanding the festival
visitors’ decision-making process and to developing
successful marketing strategies (Song et al., 2012). In terms
of theoretical background, Han (2015) and Lam and Hsu
(2006) claimed that the TPB can be a valuable theoretical
framework to understand the behavior of various tourists. In
order to identify the mechanism of TPB, exploring the
mechanism of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) is first
required since TPB is an advanced and revised model of
TRA. Behavioral intention, the most closely-related
antecedent of an actual behavior, is decided by attitude
toward the behavior (i.e., individual’s evaluation of the
extent to which the behavior is favorable or unfavorable)
and subject norm (i.e., the perception of social pressures
from close friends or important person to perform the
behavior) in the TRA (Ajzen, 1985; Lam & Hsu, 2006).
However, TRA cannot consider the situation of
non-volitional control of human behavior (Ajzen, 1991). In
the situation of non-volitional control, behavioral intention
is not the only predictor of actual behavior. An individual’s
capacity to perform a behavior can be another predictor of
the human behavior in the situation of non-volitional
control. When an individual has enough power, resources,
money, and/or free time to perform a certain behavior, the
behavioral intention and the likelihood of performing the
behavior would increase in the situation of non-volitional
control (Lam & Hsu, 2004).
In order to address the limitation of TRA, Ajzen (1985)
suggested the TPB by introducing the construct of
perceived behavioral control (PBC) as a new determinant of
behavioral intention. In the TPB, behavioral intention is
determined by attitude toward behavior, subjective norm,
and PBC (Ajzen, 1985). PBC indicates the perceived ease
or difficulty with which a specific behavior can be
performed (Ajzen, 1985, 1991; Lam & Hsu, 2006).
Therefore, the TPB becomes the more advanced theory
when considering a behavior outside of volitional control
through the construct of PBC (Ajzen, 1985, 1991; Lam &
Hsu, 2006). Leone et al. (1999) stated that the explanatory
power of intention in the TPB is superior to that of the TRA.
However, it seems that the TPB is also not the ideal theory
to explain the complex mechanism of human behaviors
since it is not enough to explain a human behavior in a
specific situation (Perugini & Bagozzi, 2001).
In this regard, revised or extended TPB (ETPB) has been
proposed and tested by several researchers and has
incorporated new predictors of intentions and behaviors
(Bagozzi, 1992; Triandis, 1977). In the field of tourism,
Lam and Hsu (2006) tested ETPB with the addition of the
past behavior variable in order to understand the behavioral
intention of choosing a travel destination for potential
Taiwanese travelers to Hong Kong. Lee and Back (2007)
built ETPB with the addition of the past behavior and the
concept of destination image to comprehend meeting
participation behavior of association members. Quintal,
Lee and Soutar (2010) applied ETPB to understand
traveling decision-making by considering the impact of risk
and uncertainty for online consumer panels in Korea,
China, and Japan. Han and Kim (2010) suggested the ETPB
which incorporates critical constructs (i.e., service quality,
customer satisfaction, overall image, and frequency of past
behavior) into the TPB model in order to understand the
complicated decision-making process of green hotel
customers. Because it was found that the ETPB is an
appropriate framework to explain a variety of tourist
behaviors based on the results of previous studies, the
current study also employs the ETPB to understand the
decision-making process of festival visitors by considering
the influence of media and image on HIF.
2. Media effect
Media is the most important promoter of consumers’
product consumption. Contemporary consumers usually
gather information through various online channels such as
mass media (e.g., TV and newspapers) and SNS (e.g.,
online news, blogs, Twitter). Media information produced
by potential customers plays a critical role in purchasing
30 Effects of media and destination image on the behavioral intention to visit Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival
and decision-making processes. Information about tourist
destinations performs an important role in tourism
destination selection, and media’s role in providing
up-do-date news to potential tourists is also essential
(Castelltort & Mäder, 2010). Information provided by mass
media affects potential tourist’s decision-making process as
they select their tourism destination (Hanefors & Mossberg,
2001). Murray (1991) has argued that perceived risk and the
process of information search are related, indicating that
perceived risk can be reduced as more information
regarding tourist destination is collected.
Morgan and Pritchard (1998) have pointed out
television’s influence and argued that in some cases,
description on TV may even alter the reality of a place. TV
shows have been catalysts for the recreation of a place as
tourism site. News media has a particularly great impact on
image formation when it reports on a distant country or
depicts a dramatic event (Castelltort & Mäder, 2010). Other
than traditional mass media sources like TV, potential
tourists’ reliance on online information (i.e., social media
such as private blogs, festival homepages) has increased
due to widespread adoption of information appliances like
smart phones or/and tablet PCs. Therefore, tourists consult
social media sites providing information both to assist
potential traveler’s travel-related decisions and to shape
perceptions and images about destination and travel
offerings (Arsal et al., 2008). Especially, information
appliances (e.g., smart phone or/and table PC) provide the
environment where one can explore information without
any space restrictions. Searching for information online
assists travelers in obtaining useful information before,
after, and during their travel. Thus, it would be safe to state
that we are living in an environment where online media has
greater influence on travelers’ decision-making process.
3. Destination image
A purchasing decision can be explained not only by the
product’s performance characteristics but also by the
consumer’s perception of its personality or image. Image
also has great influence on the travel decision-making
process. According to Guthrie and Gale (1991), visitors are
likely to act based on their perceptions and not on reality.
Destinations with stronger positive images will be more
likely to be chosen (Alhemoud & Armstrong, 1996; Echtner
& Ritchie, 1991; Lee, 2009). Therefore, destination image
simplifies the destination selection process (Gartner, 1993),
and it performs a role in travel decision, satisfaction, and
travel-related actions (Beerli & Martin, 2004; Echtner &
Ritchies, 1991; Gartner, 1986). This is why it has been
widely acknowledged as a significant concept in tourism
marketing. Several researchers have focused on the effect of
image on destination choice (Baloglu, 2000; Baloglu &
McClearly, 1999; Um & Crompton, 1990). Some scholars
have explored the image formation process (Baloglu &
McClearly, 1999; Gartner, 1993; Gunn, 1972). The
relations between information sources and a destination
choice (Um & Crompton, 1990; Woodside & Lysonsky,
1989) and the effect of image on destination preference
have also explored (Goodrich, 1978; Milman & Pizam,
1995). Gunn (1972) has also developed the notion of the
organic and induced image. An organic image is formed as
a result of general exposure to newspaper reports, magazine
articles, and other specifically non-tourist information. An
induced image is formed by deliberate portrayals and
promotions by various tourism organizations and
marketers. Gartner (1993) has developed Gunn’s (1972)
two-image concept and systematized a typology of eight
image formation agents with differing degrees of control by
the destination marketers, market penetration, and
credibility to the information receivers. He insisted these
agents affect destination image differently and should be
used in combination for effective destination image
promotion. Kim and Richardson (2003) pointed out that the
role of autonomous image formation agents such as news,
TV programs, and films appears to have particularly
powerful effects on destination image formation. Media
accessed easily in everyday life has a powerful influence
and can be used as effective promotional tool. The location
or/and event exposed by media is important in the image
formation of a travel destination. It was also found that the
image affects potential traveler’s decision-making process
(Beerli & Martin, 2004; Echtner & Ritchies, 1991; Kim &
Richardson, 2003). Therefore, creating and managing
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 31(4), 2017 31
appropriate destination images is critical to an effective
positioning and marketing strategy (Echtner & Ritchies,
1993).
4. Cognitive, affective, and unique image
Many studies on destination image have revealed that it
is made up of both cognitive/perceptive and affective
components(Baloglu & Bringerg, 1997; Beerli & Martin,
2004). Cognitive evaluations are referred to as the
individual’s knowledge and beliefs about the object, and
affective appraisals are related to an individual’s feeling
towards the object (Beerli & Martin, 2004). Gartner (1993)
regarded the former as the evaluation of the known
attributes of the object and the latter as the subjective
feelings about the object (Baloglu & Bringerg, 1997). These
two types of images have been used in many studies. On the
other hand, the three aspects—holistic, functional-
psychological, and unique-common characters—have been
suggested by Echtner and Ritchie (1993) for measuring
destination’s overall image. The unique image is the
opposite concept of the common image. Echtner and
Ritchie (1993) have pointed out that the unique image is
crucial for differentiating in the minds of the target market.
A number of studies have conceived of the unique image as
an important element that has a significant influence on a
destination’s brand and differentiates it from other tourist
destinations in order to attract more tourists (Cai, 2002;
Echtner & Ritchie, 1993; Qu, Kim & Im, 2011). Uniqueness
of a tourist destination can attract more tourists to choose
the destination over other alternatives. Qu et al. (2011) has
confirmed that a destination’s cognitive image, affective
image, and unique image affect its overall image, and this
overall image has a significant impact on intention to revisit
and recommend. Considering the characteristic of the
media exposure such as TV, newsletter or magazine,
Cognitive, Emotional and Unique image were employed in
the research.
5. Hypothetical relationships
1) Media effects on destination image
One of the factors widely considered as a potential
influence on the formation of pre-visit destination image is
the information searched and the information sources used
by the tourists (Frias et al., 2008). According to Gould and
White (1974), views about places are formed from a highly
filtered set of impressions, and images are strongly affected
by the information that individuals receive through filters.
The filters are usually related to the source of information
(Berry, 1970). Mansfeld (1992) argued that image is likely
to be formed by organic, induced, and autonomous sources
of information, Beerli and Martin (2004) stated that image
usually fulfills three basic functions in destination choice:
to minimize the risk that the decision entails, to create an
image of the destinations, and to serve as a mechanism for
later justification of the choice.
Media reports are able to cause a remarkable change in
destination image because of their high credibility and
ability to reach mass audiences (Gartner & Shen, 1992). In
particular, news media have a great impact on image
formation when they report on an unknown country or
describe a vivid occurrence (Castelltort & Mäder, 2010).
Urray (2002) alleged that places are objects of daydreaming
and fantasy that are in turn induced by advertising and other
media-generated sets of signs. Based on those studies,
information transferred through diverse media has a large
impact on a region’s image formation. Thus, we would like
to suggest the hypothesis that information exposure on one
region’s festival through media would have a significant
influence on each cognitive image, affective image, and
unique image.
H1: The level of media exposure has an effect on
destination image.
H1-1: The level of media exposure has a positive effect on
cognitive image of destination.
H1-2: The level of media exposure has a positive effect on
affective image of destination.
H1-3: The level of media exposure has a positive effect on
unique image of destination.
32 Effects of media and destination image on the behavioral intention to visit Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival
2) Image and attitude
When potential tourists have positive perceptions or
impressions of a destination, they are likely to choose that
destination (Alhemoud & Armstrong, 1996; Echtner &
Ritchie, 1993). Several scholars have focused on the
relationship between destination image and preference or
visiting intention (Goodrich, 1978; Milman & Pizam,
1995). Bigne et al. (2001) examined how the destination
image positively affects potential tourists’ satisfaction and
future behavior. Lee (2009) also confirmed that destination
image directly affects satisfaction and indirectly affects
future behaviors. Seaton (1989) insisted that image
influences tourism related attitudes and behaviors. In a
study by Watson and Hill (1993), affective image is found to
be associated with attitudes, emotions, values, and feelings.
Santos (1998) pointed out that organic image is closely
related to attitude, which involves mainly subjective
knowledge of a tourism destination. He also suggested that
image can be defined as a general attitude towards a
destination. Building on the research above, this paper is
intended to analyze the influence that a tourist destination’s
images has on tourists’ attitude toward attending HIF.
H2: Destination image has a positive effect on attitude
toward attending HIF.
H2-1: Cognitive image has a positive effect on attitude
toward attending the HIF.
H2-2: Affective image has a positive effect on attitude
toward attending the HIF.
H2-3: Unique image has a positive effect on attitude
toward attending the HIF.
3) Attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control,
past behavior and behavioral intention
Festival visitors are likely to develop their behavioral
intention to attend a festival when they: (1) have a positive
attitude toward the behavior, (2) expect that close friends or
important persons support the behavior, and (3) have
enough power, resources, money, and/or free time to
perform the behavior. In this regard, the TPB is employed to
understand visitors’ decision-making process for attending
a festival. As antecedents of behavioral intention, the role of
attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control
on behavioral intention has been well explained in previous
studies (Baker et al., 2007; Cheng et al., 2006). Researchers
in various fields have found that attitude, as one’s overall
evaluation on conducting a specific behavior, exerts a
positive influence on individual intention to perform the
behavior (e.g., Ajzen, 1991; Baker et al., 2007; Cheng et al.,
2006).
A person tends to assess the possible benefits or losses
derived from a specific behavior to decide whether or not to
perform the behavior (Baker et al., 2007; Cheng et al.,
2006). As a result, a person can have a willingness to
perform a specific behavior when the expected outcomes
are positively evaluated. In the TPB, an attitude reflecting
overall evaluation to conduct a certain behavior would
strengthen an individual’s behavioral intention (Ajzen,
1991; Baker et al., 2007). In the context of a festival, if an
individual reveals a positive attitude toward visiting a
festival after subjective evaluations for the festival visiting
behavior, it would reinforce an individual’s behavioral
intention for visiting the festival. Therefore, it is
hypothesized that attitude significantly affects behavioral
intention as follows:
H3: Attitude toward attending the HIF has a positive
effect on behavioral intention.
Cheng et al. (2006) claimed that an individual’s decision
and behavior is likely to be decided by the opinion of salient
referents. It indicates that an individual usually has a
tendency to consider and comply with other people’s
opinions in performing a specific behavior (Bearden &
Etzel, 1991). In this regard, Laroche et al. (2001)
emphasized the role of subjective norm, a perceived social
pressure for the situation whether or not an individual
performs a specific behavior, as another significant factor of
behavioral intention in the TPB. With regard to festival,
when an individual perceives that other people support
festival-visiting behavior as a positive or valuable activity,
it would enhance an individual’s behavioral intention to
visit the festival. Therefore, it is hypothesized that
subjective norm significantly affects behavioral intention as
follows:
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 31(4), 2017 33
H4: Subjective norm has a positive effect on behavioral
intention.
In the TPB, perceived behavioral control, which
considers the situation of non-volitional control, is another
crucial factor of behavioral intention. Previous studies of
TPB demonstrated that an individual’s behaviors are
affected by perceived behavioral control which indicates
individual resources or opportunities to perform the
behaviors (Ajzen, 1991; Conner & Abraham, 2001). Ajzen
(1991) stressed that as individual confidence or ability to
perform a specific behavior is fully prepared, the
individual’s behavioral intention to perform a specific
behavior can be reinforced. However, the hypothetical
relationship between perceived behavioral control and
actual behavior is not considered since the final variable of
the current study is a behavioral intention, not an actual
behavior in this study. In other words, perceived behavioral
control is only hypothesized to influence behavioral
intention for festival visiting behavior as follows:
H5: Perceived behavioral control has a positive effect on
behavioral intention.
When an individual performs a particular behavior
repeatedly or habitually, it is likely to increase the level of
the individual’s behavioral intentions to perform the
behavior. This human characteristic can be expressed by the
influence of past behavior. Several human behavior studies
have revealed that past behavior has an effect on individual
intention although the original TPB does not choose past
behavior as an antecedent of the model (Bagozzi &
Warshaw, 1992; Conner & Armitage, 1998; Han, Hsu, &
Sheu, 2010; Perugini & Bagozzi, 2001). Leone et al. (2004)
emphasized the role of past behavior as a proxy of habit to
decrease perceived risks associated with a particular
behavior. In this regard past behavior has been recognized
as an important antecedent of future behaviors (Conner &
Armitage, 1998). Based on these previous studies, it is
hypothesized that frequency of past behavior significantly
affects behavioral intention as follows:
H6: Frequency of past behavior has a positive effect on
behavioral intention.
Ⅲ. Methodology
1. Data collection procedures
In order to understand the source and influence of festival-
related information that HIF participants obtained, pre-
interviews were conducted on the festival participants. Six
participants were randomly chosen to conduct individual
Attitude
Subjectivenorm
Perceived behavioral
control
Exposed media
informationCognitive image
Behavioral intention
Frequency of past behavior
Unique image
Affective image
H1-1
H2-1
H5
H6
H3
H1-3
H2-3
H4
H1-2
H2-2
Figure 2. Hypothetical model
34 Effects of media and destination image on the behavioral intention to visit Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival
interviews on January 6, the beginning day of the festival.
These participants noted that they have obtained their
information through television news programs, television
travel programs, websites, and word of mouth. A summary
of a few participants’ answers follows:
30’s female who visited with her child:
“This is my first time visiting this festival. I decided to
visit after reading someone’s review of the festival in one of
my internet cafés. Usually, I tend to search travel-related
information on portal websites and read other people’s
review. I have already searched for the festival’s entrance
fee, map, and other activities through the festival’s official
website, blog, and other online sources. Fishing and ice
sledding were the most interesting activities. I am planning
to post the pictures taken at the festival on my Facebook,
Kakao Story (popular social media in Korea).”
Early 40’s female accompanied by her child:
“It is my second time visiting this festival. I learned
about the festival through a TV news program and
newsletter and decided to pay a visit for the first time a
couple of years ago. After I decided to participate in this
festival, I searched about what to eat and enjoy as well as
other information through portal websites. Blogs have
provided all the detailed information about what to do in
order to have successful fishing, and it has been a lot of help.
Since there are a lot of activities to enjoy with kids, such as,
fishing, I like this festival. I am planning to take pictures
during the festival and post them on Kakao Story.”
Late 30’s male:
“Since there are many people around me who already
visited this festival, I have heard a lot about this festival
from them. Thus, I have decided to participate in this
festival. I have checked the entrance fee and map on the
festival’s official homepage before visiting this festival. I
have learned how to fish when I was purchasing fishing
equipment here.”
2. Respondents’ demographic characteristics
The survey was conducted during HIF from January 21,
2013 to January 27, 2013 for seven days. Convenient
sample survey was conducted on individual festival
participants. 5 Trained undergraduate students led the
survey as examiners and a small gift was provided to
participants in order to promote survey participation.
Out of the 476 questionnaires collected during the
survey period, 25 questionnaires were excluded due to
invalidity and 451 valid questionnaires were used for
Demographic
variableFrequency %
Demographicvariable
Frequency %
Gender MaleFemale
202248
44.855.0
Visiting frequency
1st2nd3rd4th5th6~10th
2996627201719
66.314.6
6.04.43.84.2
Age Teens20's30's40'sOver 50
2511797
13279
5.525.921.529.317.5 Occupation Professional/
Technical workBusiness ownerService OfficePublic servantHouse wifeStudentRetireeOthers
107
3450312266944
42
23.7
7.511.1
6.94.9
14.620.8
.99.3
Marriage SingleMarried
166278
36.861.6
Education High schoolCollegePostgraduate
11729634
25.965.67.5
Stay duration One day1 night2 nightsOver 3 nights
2671492210
59.233.04.92.2
Table 1. Respondents’ demographic characteristics (N=450)
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 31(4), 2017 35
analysis.There were more female participants than male
participants. Respondents ranged in age, though people in
their forties were the large group, followed by people in
their twenties, thirties, and fifties, respectively. Also, there
were two times more married participants than single
participants. First-time participants made up the biggest
portion at 66%. Second-time participants made up 15% of
the respondents, with the rest being comprised of
participants who had visited three or more times. It was
found that most of the festival participants stayed at the
festival for one day.
3. Measurement developments
This study measured (1) information search level, (2)
image (Beerlie & Martin, 2004; Echtner & Ritchie, 1993;
Kim & Richardson, 2003; Qu et al., 2011; Russel & Pratt,
1980), and (3) TPB variables (Ajzen, 1991; Han et al., 2010;
Lam & Hsu, 2004, 2006) to test relationships among the
study’s variables. Specifically, the survey items of
information search level consisted of five different channels
(i.e., TV, magazine or newspaper, online media, official
festival homepage, people around participants). In this
study, the survey items of information search level are
derived from interview results (e.g., “I have been exposed
to information about HIF through TV”). Each item was
measured on a five-point Likert-type scale: (1) Never, (2)
Somewhat inapplicable, (3) Neutral, (4) Somewhat
applicable, (5) Of course. Cognitive, affective, and unique
image are used to measure overall image. Specifically,
cognitive image items (Kim & Richardson, 2003; Qu et al.,
2011) related to “festival-related facilities’s safety and
comfort,” “convenient facilities,” “food and beverage
service,” and “friendliness of festival operating staffs” were
modified to measure HIF’s cognitive image (e.g.,
“Festival-related facilities are safe and comfortable”).
Affective image items (Beerlie & Martin, 2004; Russel &
Pratt, 1980) related to “pleasant,” “excited,” “enjoyable,”
and “full of energy” were modified to measure HIF’s
affective image (e.g., “This festival is pleasant.”). Unique
image items (Echtner & Ritchie, 1993; Qu et al., 2011) are
also modified to measure HIF’s unique image (e.g., “This
festival enables me to have unique experience, even in
winter”).
Respondents were asked to indicate their levels of
agreement with a five-point Likert type scale, where
1=strongly disagree and 5=strongly agree. Lastly, TPB
variables consisted of five dimensions: attitude (4 items)
(e.g., “I think visiting the festival is a positive behavior”),
subjective norm (4 items) (e.g., “Most people who are
important to me agree with that I visit the festival”),
perceive behavioral control (4 items) (e.g., “I am confident
that if I want, I can visit the festival”), behavioral intention
(4 items) (e.g., “I want to revisit the festival next time”), and
frequency of past behavior (i.e., “How many times have you
visited HIF?”). A total of 17 items were adapted from
previous literature (Ajzen, 1991; Han et al., 2010; Lam &
Hsu, 2004, 2006). Each item was measured on a five-point
Likert scale, ranging from ‘1’ strongly disagree to ‘5’
strongly agree, except the frequency of past behavior,
which was coded as a continuous variable.
Ⅳ. Results
1. Measurement model
We adopted a confirmatory approach using PLS (Partial
Least Square) as our analysis method. PLS has been widely
used in theory testing or confirmation. It is also an
appropriate approach for examining whether relationships
might or might not exist and ultimately for suggesting later
testing hypotheses (Fornell & Lacker, 1981). We used
PLS-Graph version 3.0 to analyze the measurement and
structural model. As a result of implementing confirmatory
factor analysis in order to measure the category’s validity,
two items showing low factor loading on media information
and cognitive image were eliminated. All the composite
reliability’s values exceeded .8, and all the Cronbach’s
alphas scores exceeded .7 except the value of media (.689).
Therefore, it was found that each concept’s internal
consistency was secured (Fornell & Larcker, 1981;
Nunnally, 1987). Discriminant validity was also assessed
by comparing the Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
36 Effects of media and destination image on the behavioral intention to visit Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival
associated with each construct with the correlations among
constructs (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). The results of Table 2
and 3 confirmed discriminant validity that the square root of
the AVE for each construct is greater than the levels of the
correlations involving the construct.
2. Structural model
A bootstrapping procedure was used to generate
t-statistics and standard errors (Chin, 1998). Statistical
results indicated that media’s information has significant
influence on all three images. Among these three images,
media information has the highest influence on unique
Factor item LoadingCronbach's
alphaC.R. AVE
Media information (MEDIA)I have been exposed to this festival’s information through TV._________________ through newsletter or/and magazine._________________ through internet blog or/and internet café._________________ through Hwacheon Mountain Trout Festival’s homepage.
.660
.626
.803
.764
.689 .807 .514
Cognitive image (CI)Festival related facilities are safe and comfortable.There is sufficient number of convenient facility in this festival.There is much delicious food in this festival.There are many souvenirs that are worth purchasing.
.798
.811
.800
.740
.797 .867 .621
Emotional image (EI)This festival is pleasant.This festival is exciting.This festival is enjoyable.This festival is full of energy.
.900
.848
.906
.883
.907 .935 .782
Unique image (UI)This festival enables to have unique experience in even winter.This festival has interesting activity.This festival has unique activity.This festival’s environment is not polluted and clean.This festival enables to enjoy the nature.
.748
.852
.802
.717
.724
.829 .879 .593
Attitude (AT)I think visiting the festival is a positive behavior I think visiting the festival is a valuable behaviorI think visiting the festival is a beneficial behaviorI think visiting the festival is a necessary behavior
.872
.921
.911
.839
.909 .936 .786
Subjective norm (SN)Most people who are important to me agree with that I visit the festival_________________________ support that I visit the festival_________________________ understand that I visit the festival_________________________ recommend that I visit the festival
.898
.897
.905
.904
.923 .945 .811
Perceive behavioral control (PBC)I am confident that if I want I can visit the festivalI am capable of attending the festivalI have enough money to visit the festivalI have enough time to visit the festival
.725
.878
.856
.755
.819 .880 .649
Behavioral intention (BI)I want to revisit the festival next timeI will make an effort to revisit the festivalI am willing to recommend the festival to my neighborsI am willing to save time and money to revisit the festival
.907
.888
.871
.882
.910 .937 .787
Table 2. Reliability and confirmatory factor analysis
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 31(4), 2017 37
image (=.361, t=3.982), then cognitive image (=.276,
t=2.578) and then affective image (=.253, t=2.475),
supporting H1-1, H1-2, and H1-3. The results also indicate that
affective and unique image have significant influence on
attitude, supporting H2-2 and H2-3. Between these two
images, affective image is shown to be more powerful (
=.457, t=3.930) than unique image (=.233, t=1.988).
However, cognitive image (=.078, t=.724) is not
statistically significant in predicting attitude, thereby not
supporting H2-1.
Among four factors of attitude, subjective norm, perceived
behavioral control, and past visit behavior, only attitude and
subjective norm is shown to significantly affect behavioral
intention, supporting H3 and H4. Between these two factors,
subjective norm (=.415, t=3.072) is understood to have
higher influence over attitude (=.272, t=2.247). However,
perceived behavioral control (=.143, t=1.689) and
frequency of past behavior (=.086, t=1.153) are not
statistically significant in predicting behavioral intention,
thus not supporting H5 and H6. This finding indicates that
visitors’ attitude and subjective norms, antecedents of the
TPB model, positively affect their intention to visit the festival
as expected. It is also reveals that visitors’ media information
and images for a festival destination can indirectly influence
their behavioral intention with the aforementioned
antecedents that have been tested in the TPB.
Ⅴ. Conclusion
This study employed the ETPB to test to what extent the
predictive validity of the antecedents in the TPB can be
MEDIA CI EI UI AT SN PBC FPB BI MEDIA
CIEIUIATSN
PBCFPBBI
.717
.276
.253
.361
.352
.302
.255
.184
.276
.788 .549 .550 .457 .420 .344 .158 .507
.885
.607
.641
.612
.382
.035
.582
.770
.553
.537
.347
.067
.518
.887 .681* .400 .066 .617
.901
.444
.020
.665
.806
.155
.449
1.000 .133
.887 Note: * Pairs of constructs having highest correlations. Numbers on the diagonal indicate squared root of AVE.
MEDIA=Media information; CI=Cognitive image; EI=Emotional image; UI=Unique image; AT=Attitude; SN=Subjective norm; PBC=Perceived behavioral control; FPB=Frequency of past behavior; BI=Behavioral intention.
Table 3. Correlation and descriptive statistics
β t-value DecisionH1-1 MEDIA → CI .276 2.578* supportedH1-2 MEDIA → AI .253 2.475* supportedH1-3 MEDIA → UI .361 3.982*** supportedH2-1 CI → AT .078 .724 Not supportedH2-2 AI → AT .457 3.930*** supportedH2-3 UI → AT .233 1.988* supportedH3 AT → BI .272 2.247* supportedH4 SN → BI .415 3.072** supportedH5 PBC → BI .143 1.689 Not supportedH6 FPB → BI .086 1.153 Not supported
Note: MEDIA=Media information; CI=Cognitive image; EI=Emotional image; UI=Unique image; AT=Attitude; SN=Subjective norm; PBC=Perceived behavioral control; FPB=Frequency of past behavior; BI=Behavioral intention.*p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001
Table 4. Hypotheses and results
38 Effects of media and destination image on the behavioral intention to visit Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival
applied to the festival setting in Korea. Specifically, the
study explored the influence of exposed media information
and festival image that is closely related to the current
study’s unique setting. The results of the study show that
attitude and subjective norm have significant effects on
behavioral intention to attend the festival, whereas
perceived behavioral control and frequency of past
behavior’s impacts on behavioral intention are statistically
insignificant. The findings of current study validate the
assertion that an individual is more likely to exhibit a
behavioral intention to visit a festival if the individual has a
positive attitude toward visiting the festival and receives
support for visiting the festival from close friends or
important people. In addition the findings also verify that
the individual’s attitude towards visiting the festival is
positively determined by image toward the festival through
various media information. This indicates that Korean
visitors will form a more favorable attitude toward visiting
the HIF if they have a high level of affective or unique
image formed through media information.
Particularly, subjective norm is the most significant
predictor of behavioral intention. In terms of the extended
constructs added to the original TPB, media information
significantly affects three image factors (i.e., affective
image, unique image, and cognitive image). The fact that
media information has the greatest influence on unique
image among the three factors could be understood in the
context that information exposed through media has
reflected the HIF’s unique characteristics. For example,
pictures or/and video of many happy festival participants
fishing mountain trout through ice holes would be sufficient
to convey the festival’s uniqueness. As noted by prior
studies such as Echtner and Ritchie (1993), Cai (2002), and
Qu et al. (2011), uniqueness is an important factor.
Moreover, affective image and unique image have a
positive effect on attitude toward attending the festival.
This finding implies that media information and festival
image can stimulate visits to the festival. Further, it would
be safe to assume that affective image and unique image
have a more important influence on participants’ decision to
visit the festival than cognitive image does. Thus, festival
marketers and operators should pay more attention to
festivals’ original attraction and the emotional benefits that
can be felt by participating in the festival. These results also
indicate that the inclusion of important variables to develop
or extend the TPB is meaningful in the field of festival.
The findings of this study using the ETPB as a theoretical
framework provide several theoretical implications. First, a
utilization of the ETPB improves the understanding of the
complicated mechanism that shapes the behavioral
intention to visit the festival by taking into consideration the
influences of the media information and visitors’ images of
the festival. According to the results of current study, the
ETPB seems to be a proper framework for predicting
festival visitors’ behavior. The noteworthy effects of
attitude and subjective norm on festival visitors’
decision-making process reveal that the behavior of festival
visitors derives mainly from cognitive factors in the TPB.
Therefore, a more advanced model, like the ETPB, is
necessary to consider these factors in order to help
researchers and managers better understand the behavior of
festival visitors. The insignificant relationship between
perceived behavioral control and behavioral intention
indicates that, relatively speaking, festival visitors do not
tend to consider their resources or opportunities for the
festival at the stage of forming an intention. Furthermore,
the insignificant relationship between the frequency of past
behavior and behavioral intention implies that the
frequency of past behavior is not a direct predictor of
behavioral intention. The results of this study also have
several practical implications for the successful operation
of the festival. First, media information has a significant
impact on the formation of the festival image and indirect
effect on attitude towards the festival. Therefore, the
festival marketers should be more tactical in promoting the
event. Specifically, attitudes of visitors are significantly
affected by affective and unique image. So, they should
highlight the emotional benefits that can be experienced in
the festival, and they should emphasize the uniqueness of
the programs not found in other festivals. Second, the result
that subjective norm is the most important factor of
behavioral intention implies that neighbors’ high awareness
and support of the festival encourage people re-visit the
festival. To keep up people’s awareness and support of the
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 31(4), 2017 39
festival, the reputation of the festival should be protected by
steady publicity. Therefore, managers should place a high
value on maintaining the reputation of the festival through
managing various media types. Third, since media
information affects visitors' image of the festival and
strengthens their attitude toward it, it is quite necessary to
inform the visitors that HIF is unique as well as interesting.
Managers should develop various programs stressing its
unique and interesting components. Examples of what to
stress include ice sports (e.g., ice sledding, ice soccer,
snowball fighting, ice hockey, and ice skating) and various
ice-related cultural programs (e.g., snow castle and snow
sculptures). Additionally, practitioners need to initiate
campaigns and educational programs to enhance the image
of the HIF.
However, there is a limitation on generalizing the
research results due to the restrictive research scope on how
media information and image influence the tourist
destination decision-making and festival-visiting behavior.
Therefore, there is a need for understanding the media
information and image’s influence on the travel destination
decision-making process of various festivals in the near
future. Especially, further research should be conducted to
understand how the three aspects of image exert different
influences on travelers’ behavior depending on festival’s
types. Through further research of this nature, a
differentiated promotion strategy could be found based on
different festival types.
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckman, (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg:
Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Alhemoud, A. M. & Armstrong, E. G. (1996). Image of tourism
attraction in Kuwait. Journal of Travel Research, 34(4),
46-80.
Arsal, I., Backman, S., & Baldwin, E. (2008). Influence of an online
travel community on travel decisions. In P. O’Connor,
W. Hopken, & U. Gretzel (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2008 (pp. 82-93).
New York, NY: Springer Wien.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). An examination of the
etiology of the attitude-behavior relation for goal-directed
behaviors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27(4),
601-634.
Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions
and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 178-204.
Baker, E. W., Al-Gahtani, S. S., & Hubona, G. S. (2007). The
effects of gender and age on new technology implementation
in a developing country: Testing the theory of planned
behavior (TPB). Information Technology & People, 20(4),
352-375.
Baloglu, S. (2000). A path analytic model of visitation intention
involving information sources, socio-psychological
motivations, and destination image. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 8(3), 81-90.
Baloglu, S., & Bringerg, D. (1997). Affective images of tourism
destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 35(4), 11-15.
Baloglu, S., & McCleary, K. W., (1999). U.S. international travelers’
images of four Mediterranean destinations: A comparison
of visitors and nonvisitors. Journal of Travel Research,
38(2), 144-152.
Beerli, A., & Martin, J.D. (2004). Factors influencing destination
image. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3), 657-681.
Berry, B. (1970). Geography of the United States in the year 2000.
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 51,
1-53.
Bigné, J. E., Sanchez, M. I., & Sanchez, J. (2001). Tourism image,
evaluation variables and after purchase behavior:
Interrelationship. Tourism Management, 22(6), 607-616.
Cai, L. A. (2002). Cooperative branding for rural destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(3), 720-742.
Castelltort, M., & Mäder, G. (2010). Press media coverage effects
on destinations–A Monetary Public Value (MPV) analysis.
Tourism Management, 31(6), 724-738.
Chen, P., & Kerstetter, D. (1999). International students’ image
of rural Pennsylvania as a travel destination. Journal of Travel Research, 37(3), 256-266.
Cheng, S., Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2006). Negative word-of-mouth
communication Intention: An application of the TPB.
40 Effects of media and destination image on the behavioral intention to visit Hwacheon Sancheoneo Ice Festival
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 30(1), 95-116.
Chin, W.W. (1988). The partial least squares approach to structural
equation modelling. In G.A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Modern methods for business research (pp.1295-1336). Mahwah,
New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Conner, M., & Abraham, C. (2001). Conscientiousness and the theory
of planned behavior: Towards a more complete model
of the antecedents of intentions and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1547-1561.
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of
planned behavior: A review of the literature and avenues
for future research. Journal of Applied and Social Psychology, 28(15), 1429-1464.
Dadgostar, B., & Isotalo, R. M. (1992). Factors affecting time spent
by near-home tourists in city destination. Journal of Travel Research, 31(2), 34-39.
Echtner, C, M., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1991). The meaning and
measurement of destination image. Journal of Tourism Studies, 2(2), 2-12.
Echtner, C, M., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1993). The measurement of
destination image: An empirical assessment. Journal of Travel Research, 31(4), 3-13.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models
with unobservable variables and measurement error:
Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research,
18(1), 382-388.
Frías, D. M., Rodríguez, M. A., & Castañeda, J. A. (2008). Internet
vs. travel agencies on pre-visit destination image formation:
An information processing view. Tourism Management, 29(1), 163-179.
Gartner, W. (1986). Temporal influences on image change. Annals of Tourism Research, 13(4), 635-644.
Gartner, W. (1993). Image formation process In: M. Uysal, & D.
Fesenmaier (Eds.), Communication and channel systems in tourism marketing (pp.191-215). New York: Haworth
Press.
Gartner, W., & Shen, J. (1992). The impact of Tinnanmen Square
on China’s tourism image. Journal of Travel Research,
30(4), 47-52.
Goodrich, J. (1978). A new approach to image analysis through
multidimensional scaling. Journal of Travel Research,
16(3), 3-7.
Gould, P., & White, R. (1974). Mental maps. Baltimore: Penguin
Books.
Gunn, C. A. (1972). Vacationscape: Designing tourist regions. Austin:
University of Texas.
Guthrie, J., & Gale, P. (1991). Positioning ski areas-A case study: Central Otago, New Zealand, (pp. 553-569). Canada,
Calgary: New Horizons in Tourism Conference.
Han, H. (2015). Travelers' pro-environmental behavior in a green
lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and
the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management, 47,
164-177.
Han, H., & Kim, Y. (2010). An investigation of green hotel customers’
decision formation: Developing an extended model of the
theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 659-668.
Han, H., Hsu, L., & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the theory
of planned behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the
effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism Management, 31(3), 325-334.
Han, H., & Hyun, S. S. (2015). Customer retention in the medical
tourism industry: Impact of quality, satisfaction, trust, and
price reasonableness. Tourism Management, 46, 20-29.
Hanefors, M., & Mossberg, L. (2002). TV travel shows: A pre-taste
of the destination. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 8(3),
235-246.
Kim, H.G., & Richardson, S. L. (2003). Motion picture impacts
on destination images. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1),
216-237.
Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2004). Theory of planned behavior:
Potential travelers from China. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 28(4), 463-482.
Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2006). Predicting behavioral intention
of choosing a travel destination. Tourism Management, 27(4), 589-599.
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting
consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally
friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6),
503-520.
Lee, T. H. (2009). A structural model to examine how destination
image, attitude, and motivation affect the future behavior
of tourist. Leisure Science, 31(3), 215-236.
Lee, M., & Back, K. (2007). Association members’ meeting
participation behaviors: Development of meeting
participation model. Journal of Travel and Tourism
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 31(4), 2017 41
Marketing, 22(2), 15-33.
Lee, C. K., Song, H. J., Bendle, L. J., Kim, M. J., & Han, H.
S. (2012). The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions
for 2009 H1N1 Influenza on travel intentions: A model
of goal-directed behavior. Tourism Management, 33(1),
89-99.
Leisen, B. (2001). Image segmentation: The case of a tourism
destination. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(1), 49-56.
Leone, L., Perugine, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1999). A comparison
of three models of attitude-behavior relationships in the
studying behavior domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2-3), 161-189.
Leone, L., Perugini, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (2004). Studying, practicing,
and mastering: A test of the model of goal-directed behavior
(MGB) in the software learning domain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(9), 1945-1973.
Mansfeld, Y. (1992). From motivation to actual travel. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(3), 399-419.
Milman, A., & Pizam, A. (1995). The role of awareness and familiarity
with a destination: The Central Florida case. Journal of Travel Research, 33(3), 21-27.
Morgan, N., & Pritchard, A. (1998). Tourism promotion and power: Creating images, creating identities. Chichester: Wiley.
Murray, B. (1991). A test of services marketing theory: Consumer
information acquisition activities. Journal of Marketing,
55(1), 11-25.
Nunnally, J. C. (1987). Psychometric theory. New York: McGrawHill.
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated
emotions in goal-directed behaviors. Broadening and
deepening the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79-98.
Qu, H., Kim, L. H., & Im, H. H. (2011). A model of destination
branding: Integrating the concept of the branding and
destination image. Tourism Management, 32(3), 465-476.
Quintal, V. A., Lee, J. A., & Soutar, G. N. (2010). Risk, uncertainty
and the theory of planned behavior: A tourism example.
Tourism Management, 31(6), 797-805.
Russel, J., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of affective quality
attributed to enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 311-322.
Santos, J. (1998). The role of tour operators’ promotional material
in the formation of destination image and consumer
expectations: The case of the People’s Republic of China.
Journal of Vacation Marketing, 4(3), 282-297.
Seaton, A. (1989). Promotional strategies in tourism In S. Witt,
& L. Mautinho (Eds.), Tourism marketing and management handbook (pp. 335-339). New York: Prentice Hall.
Song, H. J., Lee, C. K., Kang, S. K., & Boo, S. J. (2012). The
effect of environmentally friendly perceptions on festival
visitors’ decision-making process using an extended model
of goal-directed behavior. Tourism Management, 33(6),
1417-1428.
Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
Um, S., & Crompton, J. (1990). Attitude determinants in tourism
destination choice. Annals of Tourism Research, 17(3),
432-448.
Urray, J. (2002). The tourist gaze. London: Sage.
Watson, J., & Hill, A. (1993). A dictionary of communication and media studies. London: Arnold.
Woodside, A., & Lysonsky, S. (1989). A general model of traveler
destination choice. Journal of Travel Research, 27(4), 8-14.
Received February 21, 2017Revised April 24, 2017
Accepted April 26, 2017