effects of forest operations (hydrofor project) - john clarke
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project)
John Clarke
![Page 2: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Forest Operations
Clearfelling
Windrowing
![Page 3: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Clearfelling
• Cutting of trees and the removal of the main tree bole.
• Different methods depending on site- cabling, skidding.
• Most common method practiced in Ireland uses - Harvesters and Forwarders.
![Page 4: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Water Quality Concerns During Clearfelling
– An increase in soil disturbance caused by the harvester moving on site.
– An increase in soil disturbance/rutting on extraction routes caused by the forwarder hauling logs to the roadside.
– Increased risk of bank collapses if machinery is operating close to streams.
– Increased risk of bank collapses if timber not stacked properly on roadside or if stacked too close to streams/drainage channels.
– Hydraulic oil spillages if pipes burst, diesel spillages during refuelling.
– Removal of protective cover that the trees provided.
![Page 5: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Windrowing- What?
What is windrowing?
• The gathering of brash and other materials leftover after clearfelling into long narrow rows.
• In addition to this, site maintenance works may also be carried out at this time such as clearing blockages from drainage channels and ditches and the construction of new drainage channels in problematic wet locations.
![Page 6: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Windrowing- What?
Some pine needles still attached to branches and some have fallen off
What is windrowed?
• Decaying branches, leaves and needles stripped off trees during felling
• Brash mats and brash bridges left behind after clearfelling
• Tree stumps and roots (not practiced in sites during this study)
![Page 7: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Windrowing- When?
When is a site windrowed?
• Before replanting- Typically 18 months after clearfelling.
Brash Mat Over Streams Removed New Drainage Channels Dug
![Page 8: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Windrowing- Why?
Why are sites windrowed?
• To clear enough space to allow for the replanting of trees.
• To maintain the site- clear blocked drains, construct new drainage channels in wet locations
![Page 9: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Water Quality Concerns During Windrowing
– An increased in soil disturbance caused by machinery moving on site.
– An increased in soil disturbance caused by the scraping and gathering of brash from the ground.
– Release and mobilisation of loose sediment and nutrients from underneath the brash.
– Removal of protective cover that the brash provides
– Mobilisation of sediment during drain clearing, risk of bank collapses, increased sediment loss if new drainage channels are constructed.
![Page 10: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Instrumentation
• Setup 1: Rectangular sharp crested weirs with end contractions constructed instream to work with ISCO automatic samplers with bubbler module attached for flow measurement.
• Setup 2: 15-20 inch drainage pipes installed instream to work with automatic samplers and flowmeters.
![Page 11: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Type of Event Data Collected
• Rainfall events/storms sampled – Sediment and nutrient runoff risk is highest.
• Automatic sampler triggered on rising water level. Trigger set manually based on storm event data collected.
• Automatic sampler- can collect 24 samples (1L each). • Once trigger level reached- time proportional sampling strategy used- First 8
samples collected in 15 mins intervals, next 6 every 30 mins, next 6 every 60 mins and last 4 every 120 mins.
• Entire storm event sampled- more samples focused on the rising limb of the hydrograph- period in which sediment and loading risk is highest
![Page 12: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Analysis of Samples
6 of the 24 samples picked out for full analysis Remaining samples analysed for pH, turbidity and conductivity
Parameters included in Full Analysis • pH •Alkalinity •Total Hardness •Ammonia •Soluble Reactive Phosphorus •Total Oxidised Nitrogen •Nitrate •Nitrite •Total Phosphorus •Dissolved Organic Carbon •Aluminium •Sodium •Potassium •Magnesium •Calcium •Chloride •Sulphate •Suspended Sediment •Silicate •Turbidity
![Page 13: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Windrowing
3 sites with similar characteristics selected and located in Co. Wicklow.
• Site 1- Annalecka Brook
• Site 2- Kilcoagh
• Site 3- Oakwood
![Page 14: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Study Site 1- Annalecka
• Plantation Size- 10 Ha
• Catchment Size- 167.5 Ha
• Felled in Spring 2010- Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis). Some needles still attached to branches, more on ground.
• Windrowing began 3rd September 2011 and lasted until 1st October 2011
• No new drainage channels constructed.
![Page 15: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Annalecka Brook Aerial Photographs
![Page 16: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Peak TSS Recorded During Sampled Events (mg/l)
![Page 17: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Peak TSS Recorded During Sampled Events (mg/l)
![Page 18: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Peak TSS Recorded During Sampled Events (mg/l)
![Page 19: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Peak TSS Recorded During Sampled Events (mg/l)
![Page 20: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Event Avg and Flow at the Time of Peak TSS (m3/s)
![Page 21: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Flow Weighted Mean Concentrations (FWMC)
• Considers the effect of different flow magnitudes when looking at sediment.
• Weighting concentrations by volume
• Total load for the time period/Total discharge for the time period
![Page 22: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Flow Weighted Mean Concentrations for Sampled Events (mg/l)
![Page 23: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Flow and Sediment Relationship Event 6- 80% Windrowed
![Page 24: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Flow and Sediment Relationship Event 7- 100% Windrowed
![Page 25: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Peak Total Phosphorous Concentrations (mg/l)
![Page 26: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SS and TP Relationship
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
SS (
mg/
l)
TP (mg/l)
R2= 0.82
![Page 27: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Windrowing Conclusions
• Peak and total sediment and nutrient concentrations increased during windrowing operations. – Elevated concentrations, while declining, seem to
persist for up to 2 years after operations ceased
• Management – No observed silt trapping structures used during
windrowing.
– Some rutting in places.
– No streams crossed by machinery.
![Page 28: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Clearfelling
2 sites with similar characteristics selected and located in Co. Wicklow.
• Site 1- Ow 1
• Site 2- Ow 2
![Page 29: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Study Site- Ow Site 1
• Study Plantation Size- 2.23 Ha. • Drainage Catchment Size- 8.77 Ha. • Tree Species- Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis) • Felling began on the 10th April 2012 and forwarding
continued until the 26th April 2012. • Felling Type- Harvester and forwarder used.
![Page 30: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
River Ow Site 1 Aerial Photograph
![Page 31: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Peak TSS Recorded During Sampled Events (mg/l)
10 50 100 % Area Felled
![Page 32: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Event Avg and Peak Flows (m3/s)
![Page 33: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
FWMC of TSS for Sampled Events (mg/l)
10 50 100 % Area Felled
![Page 34: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
566.7
5380.0
1600.0
260.0 54.0 17.0
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
00:00 12:00 00:00 12:00 00:00 12:00 00:00
Flo
w (
m3
/s)
SS (
mg
/l)
Time
DF6
SS (mg/l) Flow (m3/s)
![Page 35: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
0.000
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
12.000
14.000
0.0 1000.0 2000.0 3000.0 4000.0 5000.0 6000.0
TP (
mg
/l)
SS (mg/l)
SS and TP Relationship
R2= 0.998
![Page 36: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Felling Conclusions
• Controlling for the effect of flow and rainfall magnitude indicates that increased sediment and nutrient concentrations observed were as a result of felling operations.
• Management – No observed silt trapping structures, e.g. silt traps, straw
bales, geotextile silt fences used during felling. Roadside ditch geotextile silt fences installed ~2/3 months after forwarding finished- ineffective after large storm.
– Felling ceased during very heavy rainfall. – Some use of brash mats. – Streamside felling and forwarding.
![Page 37: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Site: Ow 1
![Page 38: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Overall Conclusions
• Large peaks in total suspended solids and total phosphorous were recorded in all of the study sites.
• Clearfelling and windrowing practices increased total and peak concentrations significantly.
![Page 39: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
![Page 40: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Study Site- Oakwood
• Site Size- 1.17 Ha
• Catchment Size- 48 Ha
• Felled in 2010- Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis)
• Windrowing began 17th October 2011 and lasted until 24th October 2011
• One new drainage channel dug
• Between the studied plantation and the study stream there is a 2-3 year old strip (50-100m+ wide in places ) of planted pine trees.
![Page 41: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Oakwood Aerial Photographs
![Page 42: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Oakwood Map
![Page 43: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Peak TSS Recorded During Sampled Events (mg/l)
![Page 44: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Oakwood Conclusions
• Sediment and nutrients increased during windrowing but on a reduced scale.
• Concentrations recorded were lower due to the presence of the 2-3 year old plantation of tree saplings (acted like a 50-100m buffer strip).
• Management – No observed silt trapping structures used during
windrowing. – Some observable rutting in places. – New drainage channel dug – No streams crossed by machinery.
![Page 45: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Windrowing Summary and Conclusions
• Annalecka- large increases in sediment and nutrient concentrations during windrowing.
• Oakwood- an increasing trend in sediment and nutrients observed. – Concentration increases not significant in terms of
biological impact due to the presence of the 2-3 year old plantation and the size of the plantation windrowed.
• Kilcoagh- an increase in sediment and nutrient concentrations recorded during windrowing. – Some large peaks observed in sediment and phosphorous.
![Page 46: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Study Site- Ow Site 2
• Plantation Size- 1.46 Ha
• Catchment Size- 21.81 Ha
• Felling began on the 16th August 2011 and forwarding continued until the 7th September 2011.
• Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis).
• Felling Type- Harvester and forwarder used.
![Page 47: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
River Ow Site 2 Aerial Photograph
![Page 48: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Peak TSS Recorded During Sampled Events (mg/l)
15 50 80 100 100 % Area Felled
![Page 49: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
![Page 50: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Ow2 Conclusions
• Removing the effect of flow indicates that increased sediment and nutrient concentrations observed were as a result of felling operations.
• Management – No observed silt trapping structures, e.g. silt traps,
straw bales, geotextile silt fences used during felling. – Felling ceased during very heavy rainfall. – Some use of brash mats. – Streamside felling and forwarding. – Deep streamside rutting occurred. – Timber stacked on stream banks.
![Page 51: Effects of Forest Operations (HYDROFOR Project) - John Clarke](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022030308/58ee827f1a28abc3678b45bb/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Conclusions
• Felling operations increased sediment and nutrient loading at both sites.
• Large increases were observed at Site Ow 1.
• At Site Ow 2 increases may not have been as high due to deep rutting alongside the study stream and some by-pass flows.