effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

11
Effect of Conservation Practices on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Accretion and Crop Yield in a Corn Production System in the Southeastern Coastal Plain, USA Tim Strickland, Brian Scully, Dana Sullivan, Zaid Abdo, Gary Hawkins, Reza Savabi, Bob Hubbard, and Dewey Lee

Upload: soil-and-water-conservation-society

Post on 07-Dec-2014

371 views

Category:

Environment


1 download

DESCRIPTION

69th SWCS International Annual Conference “Making Waves in Conservation: Our Life on Land and Its Impact on Water” July 27-30, 2014 Lombard, IL

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

Effect of Conservation Practices on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Accretion and Crop Yield in a Corn

Production System in the Southeastern Coastal Plain, USA

Tim Strickland, Brian Scully, Dana Sullivan, Zaid Abdo, Gary Hawkins, Reza Savabi, Bob Hubbard, and Dewey Lee

Page 2: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

Upper Landscape

Lower Landscape

Page 3: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

2008 Upper Landscape

2011 Lower Landscape2011 Upper Landscape

2008 Lower Landscape

Page 4: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

June 20, 2011 July 7, 2011

May 24, 2011April 13, 2011 May 24, 2011

Page 5: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

Conservation Farming Effect on Soil Carbon

Storage

Carbon Increase (kg ha-1)

Cluster 0-65 cm 0-15 cm % of Total 15-35cm % of Total

1 17,000 a 6,500 a 38 7,200 a 41

2 21,000 ab 6,800 a 33 8,500 ab 41

3 16,000 a 5,800 a 36 7,000 a 43

4 22,700 ab 7,400 a 33 8,900 ab 39

5 29,000 b 9,800 a 34 13,400 b 45

Whole Farm Carbon Increase (kg ha-1)

0-65 cm 0-15 cm 15-35cm

Average 19,900 6,900 8,400

Min 6,400 -1,800 2,900

Max 62,100 19,100 26,500

Whole Farm Regression - 2008 v 2011 Profile Carbon

0-65 cm 0-15 cm 15-35cm

Slope 10,300 790 2,030

P < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

Page 6: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

0500

1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,500

1 2 3 4 5

Kg

Ha-1

Cluster

Nitrogen - 2008

55-65 cm35-45 cm25-35 cm15-25 cm0-15 cm

0500

1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,500

1 2 3 4 5

Kg

Ha-1

Cluster

Nitrogen - 2011

55-65 cm35-45 cm25-35 cm15-25 cm0-15 cm

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

1 2 3 4 5

Kg

Ha-1

Cluster

Carbon - 2008

55-65 cm35-45 cm25-35 cm15-25 cm0-15 cm

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

1 2 3 4 5

Kg

Ha-1

Cluster

Carbon - 2011

55-65 cm35-45 cm25-35 cm15-25 cm0-15 cm

Soil Carbon Nitrogen Linkage

Page 7: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

Carbon & Nitrogen from Above-Ground

Residue

Winter Cover SE Crop Residue SE Fertilizer

Carbon (kg ha-1)

2007 ND‡ Millet ND 1008

2008 2,373 a* 186 Corn 599 a 46 1008

2009 2,900 b* 194 Peanut 2,514 b 99 0

2010 1,987 a* 179 Millet 5,539 c 302 0

2011 6,724 c* 463 Corn 804 d 36 0

Total 13,984 * 211 9,456 184 2016

Nitrogen (kg ha-1)

2007 ND Millet ND 92

2008 66 a* 8 Corn 12 a 1 92

2009 75 a* 5 Peanut 104 b 4 0

2010 69 a* 7 Millet 145 c 10 106

2011 106 b* 7 Corn 17 d 1 123

Total 316 4 277 5 413

Input (kg ha-1) Accreted (kg ha-1,

0-65 cm)

Retention

Efficiency

Total C (SE) 31,000 (670) 19,900 (1,400) 64%

Total N (SE) 1,150 (30) 2,100 (90) 183%

Page 8: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

Impact on Yield

Percentage of corn nitrogen requirement provided by soil (0-35cm) chloroform

extractable-N

2008 2011

Cluster Required N SE Required N SE

1 50 a* 15 160 a 19

2 20 b* 3 150 a 34

3 15 b* 2 150 a 31

4 12 ab 2 120 a 50

5 8 c* 0 100 a 21

kg ha‐1 (SE)

Cluster Corn‐2008 Peanut‐2009 Millet‐2010 Corn‐2011

1 1,230 (200) aA 3,050 (210) a 790 (40) a 3,700 (180) aB

2 2,180 (180) abA 3,470 (150) a 790 (100) a 4,060 (190) abB

3 3,250 (200) bcA 3,460 (180) a 660 (80) a 4,410 (260) abA

4 3,890 (120) cdA 3,590 (160) a 770 (80) a 5,440 (260) bA

5 5,250 (170) dA 3,150 (250) a 760 (190) a 6,890 (400) cB

Yield 

Average2,500 (190) A 3,350 (90) 750 (40) 4,730 (220) B

County 

Average‡7,276 3,282 NA§ 8,060

Page 9: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

Year Yield Model R2 P =

2008 Yield = x0419 + x0139 + x0439 + zone/x0218 0.989 0.02

2011 Yield = zone + x0218 + x0317 + x0439 0.989 0.02

2008+2011Yield = x0639 + x0318 + x0619 +

yr*zone/x0218 0.990 0.02

139 0-15 cm Silt%

218 15-25 cm Carbon (kg/ha)‘08 = 0.974‘11 = 0.986

317 25-35 cm Nitrogen (kg/ha)

318 25-35 cm Carbon (kg/ha)

419 35-45 cm C:N ratio

439 35-45 cm Silt%

639 55-65 cm Silt%

619 55-65 cm C:N Ratio

Page 10: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

Stage

Water Demand (cm/day)

Stage Duration

(days)

Cluster

1 2 3 4 5

Emergence 0.203 10 2 1 1 0 2

4-leaf 0.158 19 2 2 1 0 2

8-leaf 0.160 17 2 1 1 0 2

12-leaf 0.083 9 4 3 3 0 4

Early Tassel 0.142 13 2 2 1 0 3

Silking 0.119 13 3 2 2 0 3

Blister 0.055 7 6 4 4 1 7

Begin Dent 0.093 16 3 3 2 0 4

Full Dent 0.077 21 4 3 3 0 5

Maturity 0.025 15 12 9 8 1 15

Estimated† increase in water stored in the top 35cm of soil from 2008 to 2011 available to meet crop water demand during critical corn growth stages

† Williams, J.R., C.A. Jones and P.T. Dyke. 1984. A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Trans. ASAE 27(1):129-142

Page 11: Effect of conservation practives on soil carbon

Summary

• Conservation Farming increased soil C 19.9 Mg Ha-1 (8.9 Tons Ac-1) and N 2.1 Mg Ha-1 (0.9 Tons Ac-1).

• Conservation Farming increased corn yield 2230 Kg Ha-1 (1990 lbs Ac-1).

• Corn yield increases were most correlated with soil carbon content at Regression indicated that soil carbon content at a depth of 15-25 cm, and the amount of influence varied by slope position.

• Although soil carbon and nitrogen changes were highly correlated (R2 = 0.844), plant available nitrogen was greater than estimated requirement (@ 52.6 kg corn kg-1 N) and was not predictive of yield increase.

• The correlation between yield increase in an extreme drought year and soil carbon is suggested to be mediated via increased soil water holding capacity.