effect of changing ch4 2 ratio on hydrogen …

12
1 EFFECT OF CHANGING CH 4 /CO 2 RATIO ON HYDROGEN PRODUCTION BY DRY REFORMING REACTION FAKEEHA *, A.H. , ALFATISH, A.S., SOLIMAN , M.A. , IBRAHIM A.A. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING KING SAUD UNIVERSITY ,P.O.BOX 800 ,RIYADH 11421 , SAUDI ARABIA * [email protected] 1. ABSTRACT Experimental investigation for dry reforming of methane with carbon dioxide was carried out. This study was aimed to explore the effect of changing the ratio of methane to carbon dioxide in the feed gas. The experiments were carried out using seven different ratios of methane to carbon dioxide that range from 0.25 – 4.0, three different temperature 773, 823, 848 K as well as three different total feed flow rate 10, 15, 20 ml/ min. at atmospheric pressure .The runs were carried out in AMI – 2000 Zeton- Altimira microreactor. The results indicate that increasing the ratio of methane to carbon dioxide decreases methane conversion, increases in carbon dioxide conversion and decreases hydrogen yield at each temperature used. Changing total feed flow rate has no effect on either conversion or hydrogen yield. KEYWORDS: Hydrogen Production, Dry Reforming , Synthesis Gas ,CH 4 / CO 2 Ratio. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW Steam reforming of CH 4 using nickel catalyst has been industrialized for a long time [1]. In recent years, the carbon dioxide reforming of methane known as dry reforming has gained increasing importance and rapidly growing interest in the catalytic conversion of CH 4 and CO 2 to synthesis gas (syngas) because this reaction has many potential incentives with economical and environmental benefits [2-9]. Reforming equations of methane are given below: Dry reforming reaction: CH 4 + CO 2 2CO + 2H 2 H 298° = 247 kJ/mol Steam reforming reaction: CH 4 + H 2 O CO + 3H 2 H 298° = 206 kJ/mol

Upload: others

Post on 15-Nov-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

EFFECT OF CHANGING CH4 /CO2 RATIO ON HYDROGEN

PRODUCTION BY DRY REFORMING REACTION FAKEEHA *, A.H. , ALFATISH, A.S., SOLIMAN , M.A. , IBRAHIM A.A.

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING KING SAUD UNIVERSITY ,P.O.BOX 800 ,RIYADH 11421 , SAUDI ARABIA * [email protected] 1. ABSTRACT

Experimental investigation for dry reforming of methane with carbon dioxide was carried out. This

study was aimed to explore the effect of changing the ratio of methane to carbon dioxide in the feed

gas. The experiments were carried out using seven different ratios of methane to carbon dioxide that

range from 0.25 – 4.0, three different temperature 773, 823, 848 K as well as three different total feed

flow rate 10, 15, 20 ml/ min. at atmospheric pressure .The runs were carried out in AMI – 2000 Zeton-

Altimira microreactor. The results indicate that increasing the ratio of methane to carbon dioxide

decreases methane conversion, increases in carbon dioxide conversion and decreases hydrogen yield at

each temperature used. Changing total feed flow rate has no effect on either conversion or hydrogen

yield.

KEYWORDS: Hydrogen Production, Dry Reforming , Synthesis Gas ,CH4 / CO2 Ratio.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

Steam reforming of CH4 using nickel catalyst has been industrialized for a long time [1]. In

recent years, the carbon dioxide reforming of methane known as dry reforming has gained

increasing importance and rapidly growing interest in the catalytic conversion of CH4 and CO2

to synthesis gas (syngas) because this reaction has many potential incentives with

economical and environmental benefits [2-9]. Reforming equations of methane are given

below:

• Dry reforming reaction:

CH4 + CO2 ↔ 2CO + 2H2 ∆H298° = 247 kJ/mol

• Steam reforming reaction:

CH4 + H2O ↔ CO + 3H2 ∆H298° = 206 kJ/mol

2

Nevertheless, the dry reforming reaction is now being recommended for the chemical energy

transmission system (CETS) to replace steam reforming [3-5].

Fakeeha et.al [6-7] and Al-Fatish [8] peformed comprehensive studies for dry reforming of

methane using nickel based supported catalyst . Their studies concentrated on the effect of

using different supports ( alumina ,silica , TiO2 ,ZrO2) , different promoters ( Co , Ce , Mo

Ca , Sb , Sn ) , calcination temperatures . The prepared catalysts were tested at different

conditions of pressure , temperatures and flow rates . The results indicate that catalyst

prepared with high surface area alumina using Ce as promoter is the best among the tested

catalysts ,it has the highest activity and is stable for at least 98 hours

Gadalla and Sommer [10] studied and characterized an industrial Ni catalyst supported on

CaO – TiO – Al2O3. The catalyst was used for methane reforming with carbon dioxide, and

compared with catalyst containing Ni on other supports. Conversion close to 100% were

achieved during 51 hours on stream for a CO2: CH4 ratio of 2.64:1 using a weight hourly

space velocity of 7.38 h-1 despite the solid state reaction and sintering which decrease the

surface area.

Stagg et al. [11] studied the reforming of CH4 with CO2 at 800 °C over SiO2 and ZrO2

supported Pt-Sn catalyst. Several preparation methods were investigated. It was found that

the Pt/ZrO2 catalyst had much higher activity and stability than the Pt/SiO2 catalyst due to

ability of the ZrO2 to promote CO2 dissociation on this catalyst. The decomposition of CH4 and

the dissociation of CO2 occur via two independent pathways. The long-term activity of the

catalyst is dependent upon the balance between the rate of CH4 decomposition and the rate

of cleaning of carbonaceous deposits. The Co-impregnation of Sn and Pt on the ZrO2 results

in lower activity and stability than the monometallic catalysts. Depending on the reaction

conditions, disruption of the Pt-Sn alloys may occur causing deposition of tin oxide that

inhibits the role of the ZrO2. Special preparation methods can result in the controlled

placement of Sn on the Pt particle minimizing the promoter-support interaction. The catalysts

exhibit higher activity and stability than the monometallic catalyst under severely deactivating

conditions, 800 °C and 3:1 ratio of CH4: CO2. It is possible to deposit Sn onto Pt/ZrO2 catalyst

in manner, which reduces carbon deposition without inhibiting the beneficial role of the

support.

3

Liu and Au [12] reported that investigation for dry reforming has been renewed due to

environmental and commercial reasons. Synthesis gas with a low H2: CO ratio is preferred

for the production of liquid hydrocarbons and oxygenated derivatives. One advantage of CO2/

CH4 reforming is the low H2: CO ratio in syn gas formation; the process opens the possibility

of combining steam reforming, partial oxidation, and dry reforming for the generation of a syn

gas with a desired H2: CO ratio. For environmental protection and to fight against global

warming, it makes sense to study the utilization of CO2 and CH4. Both compounds are

considered as greenhouse gases. In addition, since there is CO2 (≥ 25 vol. %) in field gases,

it is beneficial to utilize CO2 directly in methane, reforming rather than separating it from

methane.

Wargadalm et al. [13] studied methane reforming with CO2 in hot temperature in a thermal

diffusion column reactor. The temperature effect on tungsten, molybdenum and chromel wires

showed molybdenum to be the best wire. As the ratio of CO2: CH4 changes from 1.97 to 0.55,

the CO: H2 ratio changed from 1.56 to 0.74. Accordingly, it may be possible to change the

composition of the synthesis gas to suit the utilization to which it is intended.

Huang et al [14] performed CO2 reforming of CH4 at atmospheric pressure by alternating

current discharge plasma in Y type reactor. The investigators studied the effects of reaction

parameters such as input voltage, total flow rate, mole fraction of methane to carbon dioxide,

selective excitation of either reactant, and micro-arc formation, on product distribution and

energy efficiency. Their result showed the dependence of CH4 and CO2 conversions and

selectivity on the CH4 / CO2 ratio. With an increasing of CH4 / CO2 ratio from 1/9 to 9/1, the

conversion of CH4 (97.3-84.2) and selectivity to hydrogen (74.5-28.6) and to CO (98.9-21.5)

decreased while the conversion of CO2 (22.0-77.5) and to hydrocarbons increased.

The specific objectives of this research is to investigate the effect of changing the percentage

of methane to carbon dioxide in the feed for the production of synthesis gas using nickel

based catalyst at different temperatures and flow rates.

3. EXPERIMENTAL

In this work Ni - base supported catalysts were used . The support used is γ-alumina (SA-

6175) with surface area of (230 – 290 m2/gm) Impregnation of the support was carried out

4

with aqueous solutions of nickel-nitrate. Cerium (Ce) is used as promoter in preparation of

the supported Ni- based catalysts. The resulting catalyst dried in the oven at 110 C for 13

hours then calcined at 600 C in air atmosphere for 5 hour.The reproducibility of the results

was checked during this work period by repeating the experiments under the same

conditions several times.

Experimental Set-up The heart of the experimental setup used in this study is a micro-reactor made by ZETON-

ALTAMIRA ( model AMI 2000) . The whole experimental setup is shown schematically in

Fig. 1. The system is composed of the following sections:

I. Feed Section: The feed section contains three gas cylinders for CO2, CH4 and N2.

Gases coming from the regulators pass through in-line filters then introduced to the

Mass Flow Controllers (MFC), obtained from Brooks. The gases are mixed and passed

to the reaction section. On line samples from the feed gas mixture are directed to gas

chromatograph for analysis.

II. Reaction Section: The micro-reactor overall length is 0.43m, with inside diameter of

6.35x10-3 m made of stainless steel and surrounded by three zones heater. Each zone

temperature can be controlled separately. The temperature in the reactor is measured

by a thermocouple located in the catalyst bed. The outlet from the reactor (bottom end)

is passed through a backpressure regulator (BPR) to control the pressure in the reactor

and the product gases from the BPR were sent to analysis section.

III. Analysis Section: The analysis was carries out by using Varian gas chromatograph

( model 3400 CX ) with TDC detector; the TDC detector is equipped with Hysis column.

Catalysts Characterization:

The BET surface area for selected catalysts are meaured by using equipment model

(ASAP2010) , samples of catalysts were analysized by using Scanning electron micro

scope (SEM) model “ JEOL, JSM – 6360A “ to get pictures for the surface of the catalysts

5

Activation procedure

The activation procedure is as follow:

A. Introduce hydrogen to the reactor at 20 ml/min for 2.5 hr.

B. Then hydrogen is stopped while N2 is introduced at 40 ml/min for one hour

This pretreatment process was found to be essential for the reaction to take place [6-8 ].

Figure .1: Schematic diagram of experimental setup: HV1, HV2 and HV3: Filters, MFC s Mass Flow Controller, PG Pressure Gauge CV1, CV2 and CV3 Shut – off Valves, SV1: Sampling Valve, F: Furnace, R: Reactor, T1 ، T2 and T3: Temperature Measurement location (by Thermocouple), GC: Gas Chromatograph, PCV: Pressure Control Valve.

6

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

The experimental runs were carried out in order to achieve the objectives of this investigation

by finding the effect of changing the ratio of methane to carbon dioxide in the feed gas .The effect of

changing total feed flow rate were also investigated. To insure reproducibility of the results , the

experiments were repeated under similar conditions several times during the course of this work.

Effect of Changing Methane to Carbon Dioxide Ratio in the Feed:

Seven methane to carbon dioxide ratios were selected during this project:2/8 (0.25), 3/7

(0.43), 4/6 (0.67), 5/5 (1), 6/4 (1.5), 7/3 (2.33), and 8/2 (4). The runs for each set of

experiment were carried out at constant flow rate of 10ml/ min and total pressure of 14.7 psi

and specific temperature. The results for methane conversion, carbon dioxide conversion and

hydrogen yield are shown in figures 2-4. respectively. Three different sets were performed at

three different temperature 773, 823, 848 Kº. For methane conversion, Figure (2) indicates

that as the ratio of methane to carbon dioxide increases at 773 Kº, the methane conversion

decreases sharply up to a ratio of 5/5. Then the conversion decrease reduces slowly up to a

ratio of 7/3 then it become constant after that within our experimental range. The methane

conversion decreased from 30% at a ratio of 2/8 to almost 10% at a ratio of 8/2. The same

trend for the effect of changing methane to carbon dioxide ratio was obtained at 823 Kº, but

with more sharper decrease at the start. The methane conversion decreased from a value of

58% at a ratio of 2/8 to 24% at a ratio of 8/2. Similar behavior was obtained at 848 Kº with

methane conversion decreased from 70% at a ratio of 2/8 to 30% at a ratio of 8/2 methane to

carbon dioxide.

The reasons for the decrease in methane conversion can be explained using the la chatelier

principle.

224 22 HCOCOCH +↔+

At low CH4 / CO2 ratio since CO2 is in excess, it forces CH4 to be converted to CO and H2 (

according to La chatelier principle) . As CH4 / CO2 ratio increased,the CO2 amount

decreased causing lower CH4 conversion. When the ratio increased above 1, CH4 starts to

decomposed to carbon and hydrogen according to the following equation:

CH4 ↔ 2H2 + C

7

This accounts for not continuing the decrease trend in methane conversion. As evidenced by

the increased ratio of H2: CO.

Figure 2 . Effect of changing CH4/CO ratio on CH4 Conversion.

05

1015202530354045505560657075

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4

CH 4 / CO2

CH

4 C

onve

rsio

n pe

rcen

t

T=773 ºK T=823 º K T=848 º K

F=10 ml/min , P=14.7 PSI Support( SA-6175)

Figure (3) presented the conversion of carbon dioxide as function of methane to carbon

dioxide ratios at a total flow rate of 10 ml/min, total pressure of 14.7 psi and three different

temperature 773, 823 and 848 Kº.

The trend here is opposite to what obtained for methane conversion, the carbon dioxide

conversion increased as the ratios of methane to carbon dioxide increased. The carbon

dioxide conversion is 15% at 773 Kº for methane to carbon dioxide ratio of 2/8 and increased

to almost 40% at a ratio of 8/2. The carbon dioxide conversion at higher temperatures 823,

848 Kº are 25% and 31% at a ratio of 2/8 and increased to 55% , 65% at a ratio of 8/2

respectively. The increase in CO2 conversion is due to increase in the amount of CH4, which

causes more conversion of CO2 according to Le chatelier principle.

WHEC 16 / 13-16 June 2006 – Lyon France

8/12

Figure 3 . Effect of changing CH4/CO2 ratio on CO2 Conversion .

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4

CH 4 / CO2

%C

O2

Con

vers

ion

T=773 ºK T=823 ºK T=848 ºK

The hydrogen yield is shown in Figure (4). From the previously discussed cases, the effect of changing the

ratios of methane to carbon dioxide is similar to that of methane conversion. Three set of results were plotted

with total flow rate of 10ml/min and a total pressure of 14.7 psi and at temperatures of 773, 823, 848 Kº.

Figure 4 . Effect of changing CH4/CO2 ratio on hydrogen yield

05

1015202530354045505560657075

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 CH 4 / CO2

H2

yiel

d %

T=773 ºK T=823 ºK T=848 ºK

F=10 ml/min , P=14.7 PSI support ( SA-6175)

F=10 ml/min , P=14.7 PSI Support ( SA-6175)

WHEC 16 / 13-16 June 2006 – Lyon France

9/12

Effect OF Flow Rate:

Three different flow rate were chosen 10 ml/ min, 15 ml/min and 20 ml/min .The total pressure used was

14.7 psi and methane to carbon dioxide was fixed at 0.25. Three different set of experiments were performed

at these flow rates. Each set was performed at a specific temperature. The temperatures used for these sets

are 773, 823, 848 Kº. The results are shown in Figure 5. and. There is almost no change in hydrogen yield

at each set when flow rate changes within our experimental range. At 773 Kº, 30% hydrogen yield was

obtained. As temperature increased the hydrogen yield increased. At 823 and 848 Kº, the hydrogen yield

are approximately 51% and 64% respectively. The constancy in hydrogen yield with the change in flow rate

indicates that the reaction reaches equilibrium condition.

The BET- surface area of the alumina support , fresh catalyst and used catalyst are 222.5 , 208.5 and 194

m2 / gm. Picture for fresh and used catalyst are shown at figures 6&7.

F igure 5 . E ffec t o f chang ing flow ra te on hydrogen y ie ld

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

10 12 14 16 18 20

Tota l flow ra te ( m l/m in .)

Per

cent

H2 y

ield

T=773 ºK T=823 ºK T=848 ºK

P =14.7 P S I S upport( SA -6175) C H 5/C O 2 = 0 .25

WHEC 16 / 13-16 June 2006 – Lyon France

10/12

Figure 6 . Scanning microscopy of fresh catalyst at 500 magnification

Figure 7. Scanning microscopy of used catalyst at 900 magnification

WHEC 16 / 13-16 June 2006 – Lyon France

11/12

5. CONCLUSION Experimental investigation for the effect of changing the ratio of methane to carbon dioxide in the feed to dry

reforming reaction were carried out in AMI- 2000 Zeton – Altimira micro-reactor. Seven ratios of methane to

carbon dioxide that range from 0.25 –4.0 were selected in this study. Three different temperatures were used

773, 823 and 848 Kº. Similarly three different total feed flow rate were also used 10, 15, 20 ml/min. The

following conclusions could be drawn from the results obtained in this investigation:

• Increasing CH4 / CO2 ratio led to decrease in methane conversion at each temperature used.

• Increasing CH4 / CO2 ratio led to an increase in carbon dioxide conversion at each temperature

used.

• Increasing CH4 / CO2 ratio led to decrease in Hydrogen yield at each temperature used.

• As temperature increased the conversion of both gases as well as hydrogen yield increased.

• No effect on conversion or hydrogen yield was observed by changing total feed flow rate.

6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Principal investigator and research team would like to thank the Saudi Basic Industrial

Cooperation (Sabic), for funding this investigation through the grant given to the University to

support research and the College of Engineering Research Center for accepting this investigation as

project # (14/425) and all supports they provided.

7. REFERENCE [1] G. Barbieri, V. Violante, F.P.Di Mario, A. Criscuoli, and E. Drioli, “Membrane-steam reforming analysis in

a palladium-based catalytic membrane reactor. Ind. Eng Chem Res, 36, pp.336, 1997.

[2] S. Wang and Lu. GQM, “ A comprehensive study on carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Ni/γ-

Al2O3 catalysts”, Ind. Eng Chem. Res., 38, pp. 2615, 1999.

[3] V.R. Choudhary and A.S. Mamman, ““ Simultaneous oxidative conversion and carbon dioxide or

steam reforming of methane to syngas over CoO-NiO-MgO catalysts “, J. Chem. Technol.

Biotechnical , 73, pp. 345 (1998).

WHEC 16 / 13-16 June 2006 – Lyon France

12/12

[4] T. Osaki, T. Horiachi, K. Suzuki, T. Mori, “Suppression of carbon deposition in Carbon dioxide

reforming of methane on metal sulphide catalyst”, Catal. Lett., 35, pp.39, 1995.

[5] Y. Sakai, H. Satio, T. Sodesawa and F. Nozaki, React. Kinet. “Catalytic reactions of hydrocarbon

with carbon dioxide over metallic catalysts.”, Catal. Lett., Vol. 24, No. 3-4, pp.253, 1984.

[6] Fakeeha, A.H., Soliman, M.A. and AL Fatish, A.S., “ The effect of usin different supports on the

production of hydrogen by dry reforming “, proceeding of 1St European Hydrogen Energy

confernce,held at Grenoble , France , during 2-5 September 2003.

[7] Fakeeha, A.H., Soliman, M.A. and AL Fatish, A.S., “ Effect of Promoters on hydrogen production

by dry reforming Reaction“, proceeding of 2nd European Hydrogen Energy conference, held at

Zaragoza , Spain , September 22-25, 2005.

[8] Al-Fatish , A.S. “ Dry reforming of Methane over Supported Nickel Catalysts” , Ms Thesis, King Saud

Univesity,2003.

[9] S. Wang and Lu GQM, “ A comprehensive study on carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Ni / γ-

alumina catalyst “, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38, pp. 2615, (1999).

[10] A.M.Gadalla and M.E. Sommer, “Carbon dioxide reforming of methane on Nickle catalyst”, Chem.

Eng. Sci., 44, pp.2825, 1989.

[11] S.M. Stagg. E. Romeo and D.E. Resasco, “Effect of promotion with Sn on supported Pt catalyst for

carbon dioxide reforming of methane”, J. Catal. 178, pp.137, 1998.

[12] B.S. Liu and C.T. Au. ”Carbon deposition and catalyst stability over La2NiO4/ γ- Al2O3 during carbon

dioxide reforming of methane to syngas”, Appl. Catal. A: General, 244, pp.181, 2003.

[13] V.J. Wargadalam, N.R. Hunter and H.D. Gesser, “The carbon dioxide reforming of methane in a

thermal diffusion column hot wire reactor”, Fuel Processing Technology, 59, No 2-3, pp.201, May

1999.

[14] A. Huang, G Xia, J. Wang, S.L. Suib, Y Hayashi and Hmatsumoto,” CO2 Reforming of CH4 by

Atmospheric pressure ac discharge plasmas”, Journal of Catalysis, 189 , pp. 349, 2000.