ee09
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 EE09
1/12
Benefit-Cost Analysis inEnvironmental Decision Making
Chapter 9
2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
-
8/3/2019 EE09
2/12
2
Adjusting for the Time Dimension ofEnvironmental Benefits and Costs
Present Value Determination a procedure
that discounts a future value (FV) into itspresent value (PV) by accounting for the
opportunity cost of moneyDiscount factor the term 1/(1+r)t, where tis the
number of periods
Social discount rate discount rate used for publicpolicy initiatives based on the social opportunity
cost of funds
-
8/3/2019 EE09
3/12
3
Adjusting for the Time Dimension ofEnvironmental Benefits and Costs
Inflation correction a magnitude stated interms of the current period
Nominal value a magnitude stated in terms of the
current periodReal value a magnitude adjusted for the effects of
inflation
Deflating converts a nominal value into its real value
-
8/3/2019 EE09
4/12
4
Adjusting for the Time Dimension ofEnvironmental Benefits and Costs
Summary of Deriving Time-Adjusted Benefitsand Costs
Present value of benefits (PVB) the time-adjusted
magnitude of incremental benefits associated withan environmental policy change
Present value of costs (PVC) the time adjustedmagnitude of incremental costs associated with anenvironmental policy change
-
8/3/2019 EE09
5/12
5
The Final Analysis: ComparingEnvironmental Benefits and Costs
Step One: Determining Feasibility
Benefit-cost ratio the ratio of PVBto PVCused todetermine the feasibility of a policy option if itsmagnitude exceeds unity
Present value of net benefits (PVNB) thedifferential of (PVB PVC)used to determine thefeasibility of a policy option if its magnitude exceedszero
-
8/3/2019 EE09
6/12
6
The Final Analysis: ComparingEnvironmental Benefits and Costs
Step Two: Decision Rules to Select AmongFeasible Options
Maximize the present value of net benefits (PVNB)
a decision rule to achieve allocative efficiency byselecting the policy option that yields greatestexcess benefits after adjusting for time effects
Minimize the present value of costs (PVC) adecision rule to achieve costeffectiveness by
selecting the least-cost policy option that achieves apreestablished objective
-
8/3/2019 EE09
7/12
7
Reservations About the Use of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Measurement Problems
Estimation is particularly problematic due tointangibles
Implicit costs
Equity Issues
Distribution of benefits and costs may be highlyskewed
-
8/3/2019 EE09
8/12
8
U.S. Government Support of Benefit-CostAnalysis
Executive order 12291: Regulatory ImpactAnalysis (RIA)
Regulatory impact analysis (RIA) a requirement
under Executive Order 12291 that called forinformation about the potential benefits and costs of
a major federal regulation
-
8/3/2019 EE09
9/12
9
U.S. Government Support of Benefit-CostAnalysis
Executive order 12866 Economic Analysis (EA)
Economic analysis (EA) - a requirement underExecutive Order 12866 that called for information onthe benefits and costs of a significant regulatory
action
-
8/3/2019 EE09
10/12
10
Reducing Lead in Gasoline: A RegulatoryImpact Analysis
Estimating the incremental benefits of thelead standard proposal health benefits
Nonhealth Benefits
Reduction in harmful emissions caused bymisfueling (i.e., the use of leaded gasoline invehicles requiring unleaded gasoline)
Lower maintenance costs
Increased fuel economy
-
8/3/2019 EE09
11/12
11
Reducing Lead in Gasoline: A RegulatoryImpact Analysis
Figure 9.1 Correlation Between Lead in Gasoline and AverageBlood Lead Levels
-
8/3/2019 EE09
12/12
12
Reducing Lead in Gasoline: A RegulatoryImpact Analysis
Estimating the Incremental Costs of the LeadStandard Proposal
Engineering cost model
Putting It All Together: Benefit-Cost Analysis The Final Decision