ed 353 032 jc 930 067 title institution pub … · 40z fte generated 83.72 159.23 178.24 159.83...

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 353 032 JC 930 067

TITLE Hunt Club Satellite Center Three Part Analysis.INSTITUTION Seminole Community Coll., Sanford, Fla.PUB DATE Jun 92NOTE 55p.PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) Statistical

Data (110)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS College Credits; Community Characteristics; Community

Colleges; Credit Courses; Full Time Equivalency;*Institutional Characteristics; Noncredit Courses;Program Descriptions; *Satellite Facilities; *StudentCharacteristics; Two Year Colleges; Two Year CollegeStudents

IDENTIFIERS *Seminole Community College FL

ABSTRACTConsisting primarily of data tables and charts, this

report on the Hunt Club Center (HCC) at Seminole Community College(SCC) in Sanford, Florida, presents information on course offeringsand full-time equivalency (FTE) production for academic years 1987-88through 1991-92; HCC area demographics; and student characteristicsduring fall terms 1990 and 1991, respectively. Study findings includethe following: (1) the majority of courses, student enrollments, andFTE generation at HCC are for college credit; (2) college creditcourses have had a greater enrolled class size than noncreditclasses; (3) though sporadic, growth at HCC has been fueled primarilyby evening classes; (4) generally, student FTE's increase in responseto increases in course offerings; (5) HCC is located close to thehighest growth areas in Orange and Seminole counties; (6) while thelower income areas of Orange county may resemble the more traditionalsources of community college students, such areas have a much smallerpopulation than their Seminole county equivalents, and targetingthese Orzage county areas may limit enrollment growth potential; (7)

over 25% of HCC enrolled students are attending on a full-time basisand are enrolled in college-credit courses; (8) approximately 50% ofHCC students also attend SCC; (9) in all typas of courses, HCCstudents generated more FTE at HCC than at SCC; (10) the majority ofHCC college credit and college preparatory students enrolledexclusively in evening classes, while the majority of continuingeducation and vocational/technical students enrolled exclusively inday classes; and (11) the HCC student body has a greater percentagesof white students than SCC. (PAA)

***********************************************************************

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made* from the original document.************************************: c*** ****** *** * ********* ******* *****

5

.

1

1°I cn

SEMINOLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

HUNT CLUB SATELLITE CENTERTHREE PART ANALYSIS

IAR JUNE 1992

"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

A. P. Donsky

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)

BEST COPY MIELE

2

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice 01 Eaucattonat Research and improvement

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER tERICIr has been reproduced as

recened trom the person or OrpanilafiOn

C Minor changes bane been made to improvereproduction qualay

Points 01 mew Or opavons stated in th,sdocuwent do not necessarily represent of I.c.aiOEMpOsdonOrPohey

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PART I

Hunt Club in number of courses, students, and FTE generation ispredominately college credit.

- College credit courses have been more successful in percentagethat run and in enrolled class size.

- Primarily fueled by evening credit classes, Hunt Center growthhas been sporadic.

Generally, FTE increased in response to increased courseofferings.

PART II

- Hunt Club Center is positioned close to the highest growth areasin Orange and Seminole counties.

The lower income Orange county areas may resemble the moretraditional sources of community college students. However thesetracts have a much smaller population than their Seminole Countyequivalents and may limit growth potential.

PART III

- HC has primarily college credit and college preparatoryenrollments, with over one-fourth full-time college-creditstudents.

- Around 50% of the college credit and college preparatory studentsattend both Hunt Club and the main campus.

- HC students in all course types earn more FTE at HC than at maincampus.

- A very small percentage of adult/continuing ed andvocational/technical students attend both campuses.

- Majority of College credit/college preparatory students enrolledexclusively in evening classes.

Majority of adult/continuing eel and vocational/technical studentsenrolled exclusively in day classes. many of thevocational/tecnical students older women.

- Larger white HC student population and fewer blacks and Spanish,percentage-wise, than SCC as a whole.

HC student females outnumber males by a higher percentage thanSCC as a whole.

PART ICOURSE OFFERINGS AND FTE PRODUCTION

4

FORWARD

The following represents a summary of the enrollment patterns at

the Hunt Club Center. It is based on class enrollment filesaccessed in February of 1992 which display class enrollments backto Term III of 1986-87. ( The Center opened in Term II of 86-87.)It should be remembered that any changes made to these files since86-87 will be reflected in this data and make the data slightlydifferent from the original information. For the purposes of thiswork,though,the analysis represents an accurate portrayalof enrollment history.

The data presented in this study reflects four full year's

experience at the Center plus a portion of 91-92 (through February4, 1992). It is anticipated that this work will be followed up bya demographic analysis.

SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS

- Four course types have been offered at the Hunt Club Center:College Credit, College Preparatory, Adult & ContinuingEducation, and Vocation/Technical.

The total number of courses initially offered at the Centerin the period from 1987-88 to 1990-91 has a range of 367 to425. In 1991-92 the number offered as of February 4, 1992 was407, a drop from the 1990-S1 figure of 425. (Although the numbermay rise by the end of the report year.) (see table 2)

College Credit courses as of February 1992 represent over 70%of the FTE produced at the Center which has grown steadily froma low of 58% in 1988-89. The dominance of College Credit is morestriking with evening courses as opposed to day. (see table 4)

The tendency has been to increase the number of College Creditcourses initially offered each year relative to the other coursetypes, particularly in evening classes/Fall terms. (see table 3)

From 1987-88 to 1989-90, when there have been more initial courseofferings, the final FTE generated has also increased. This didnot occur in 1990-91, or thus far in 1991-92, although the impactof the number of offered courses on FTE production and coursecancellation will not be clear until the end of '91-92. (seetable 1)

In' only two of the five years examined have the number of initialday course offerings or evening course offerings increased overthe previous year. (see table 1)

Despite fluctuations in number of course offerings and FTE outputat the Hunt Club, its yearly FTE as a percentage of the total FTEof SCC has remained relatively constant at the 5% rangeafter the first full year of operation (starting in '88-89.)(see table 1)

Discounting College Prep (which represents only a small number ofcourses taught at the Center),from 1989-90 to present,CollegeCredit courses run in the evening have had the highest percentageof courses offered that ran. (see table 2)

Discounting College Prep (which represents only a :mall number ofstudents), from 19e7-88 to present College Credit has had alarger percentage of enrolled over potential students in eveningcourses relative to the other course types. (see table 5)

After the initial year of 1987-88, the cost per FTE has decreasedthrough 1989-90, but increased in 1990-91. When available, the1991-92 cost data will indicate whether this rise is a trend.(see table 6)

OBSERVATIONS

The Hunt Club Center, since its inception, appears to have beenfueled by evening Credit Courses. The growth has been somewhatsporadic as opposed to a straight linear increase. With theexception of 1990-91, the Center has increased FTE in response toincreased course offerings. The demographic portion of theanalysis should provide additional information.

HUNT CLUB REPORT

SUMMARY

YEAR TOTALS

Table 1

1987-88

1988-89

1989-90

1990-91

1991 -92

(Thru

2/04/92)

All Hunt Club Course Types'

# of Day Courses Offered

211

244

247

260

229

# of Day Courses Ran

128

188

195

195

163

Z of Day Courses Offered Ran

61Z

77%

79%

75X

7IZ

# of Possible Students

5768

6103

6734

6354

6023

il of Enrolled Students

1629

3000

3296

2872

2429

Z of Possible Students Enrolled

28Z

49Z

49X

452

40Z

FTE Generated

83.72

159.23

178.24

159.83

141.29

# of Evening Courses Offered

156

132

166

165

178

# of Evening Courses Ran

131

113

139

135

151

X of Evening Courses Offered Ran

04X

86Z

84X

82%

85%

# of Possible Students

3890

3390

4377

3952

4547

I of Enrolled Students

2008

1864

2401

2190

2478

% of Possible Students Enrolled

522

552

552

552

542

FTE Generated

99.4

116.89

148.61

144.32

162.05

Total H C FTE

183.12

276.12

326.85

304.15

303.34

Total SCC FTE

5487.59

5944.81

5895.38

5948.6

5886.03

2 of Total HE Generated by H C

32

5%

62

52

52

8

Amounts may not total due to rcunding

Source' Daily FTE's run February, 1992

8E51

CO

PY

RUNT CLUB REPORT

COURSES

bunt Club Day Courses'

College Credit

College Preparatory

Adult t Continuing Education

Vocatienal/Technical

TOTAL N C Oily Courses

Nunt Club Evening Courses'

College Credit

College "'reparatory

Adult & Continuing (Melon

Vocatlonal/Technic.1

TOTAL N C Evening Courses

bunt Clvb Day & Evening Courses'

College Credit

College Preparatory

Adult 4 Continuing Education

Vocatimil/Tethnical

TOTAL All M C Courses

1 0

Table 2

TEAR TOTALS

1917.18

1988-89

1989-90

1990-91

1991-92

(Theo

2/04/921

Number

Number

% of

Number

Number

% of

Number

Number

at of

Number

Number

1 of

Number

Number

.% of

Offered

Ran

Offered

Offered

Ran

Offered

Offered

Ran

Offered

Offered

Ran

Offered

Offered

Ran

Offered

Ran

Ran

Ran

Ron

Ran

101

51

500

86

60

700

12

71

772

97

73

752

102

/8

761

54

800

64

671

32

670

32

671

33

1001

51

25

410

49

42

860

66

52

790

70

57

810

60

34

570

54

48

891

103

82

800

86

70

811

90

63

700

64

48

750

211

121

611

244

188

Pt

247

195

790

260

1,5

751

229

163

711

75

58

772

95

11

852

111

98

881

115

102

891

121

(04

861

00

02

11

1002

44

1000

33

1001

88

1000

25

20

801

21

18

862

31

22

711

25

18

720

16

12

751

56

53

951

15

13

870

20

15

752

22

12

551

33

27

820

156

131

141

132

113

Ili%

166

139

141

165

135

820

178

151

851

176

109

621

161

141

782

203

169

832

212

175

830

223

182

820

54

801

75

712

76

862

65

831

11

11

1000

74

45

51t

70

60

861

97

74

740

95

75

790

76

46

410

110

101

920

118

95

11R

106

85

800

112

75

670

91

/5

771

367

259

711

316

301

BOX

413

334

Ill

425

330

782

407

314

771

1Sovrcel

Osily FTE's rum February, 1992)

BE

ST C

CM

,rr:

HU

NT

CLU

B R

EP

OR

TC

CO

XE

S O

FF

ER

ED

9.11

1131

FA

LL T

ER

MS

WIN

TE

R T

ER

ttS

Able 3

TE

RI

TE

RI

Mr

TE

MM

IT

EM

TE

MT

IMT

art

MO

Mel

Tan

Mr1

TE

MT

ER

IT

DM

alT

ER

IT

ER

riT

EM

863

173

183

193

903

864

874

684

194

904

171

881

891

901

911

872

882

892

902

912

(T)v

4

2/04

/92)

Amber of Day Courses Offered:

Col

lege

Cre

dit

ZS

1622

2323

128

68

931

2929

3135

3333

35

35

35

Col

lege

I -e

para

tory

11

00

01

00

00

33

21

10

21

Adu

lt &

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

1014

2022

la0

00

00

1516

202z

1626

1926

26

Voc

atio

nal/T

echn

ical

3534

2733

270

00

00

2523

2125

2511

1035

3212

TO

TA

L H

.C. D

ay C

ours

es51

6569

7$61

131

6S

974

77

7579

77

7394

9795

75

*abe

t of P

ealn

; Cou

rses

Offe

red:

Col

lege

Cre

dit

1517

2527

V7

79

1210

7732

3637

4526

3911

3939

Col

lege

Pre

para

tory

00

00

20

00

00

01

22

30

02

13

Adu

lt &

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

72

106

70

00

0o

a9

1010

s10

10It

94

Voc

atio

nal/T

echn

ical

206

22

30

00

00

20

6a

87

163

912

z)

TO

TA

L H

.C. E

veni

ng C

ours

es42

2538

3539

77

912

1055

4856

5760

5252

6361

69

16a

bet o

f Tot

al S

C C

ours

es O

ffere

d;C

olle

ge C

redi

t40

.33

47S

O50

1915

1520

1958

6165

6880

5971

7674

74

Col

lege

Pre

para

tory

11

00

21

00

00

34

43

40

23

35

Adu

lt &

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

1716

3028

250

00

00

2325

3032

2136

1937

3530

Voc

atio

nal/T

echn

ical

3540

3035

300

00

00

4535

3233

3230

4344

44

35

TO

TA

L A

LL H

.C. C

ours

es93

9210

711

310

720

1515

2019

129

125

131

136

137

125

146

160

156

114

Sou

rce:

Dai

ly F

TE

's r

un F

ebru

ary,

199

2

12,

ts,

J. 43

BE

ST C

EO

r,-1

HU

NT

CL

UB

RE

POR

T

FIE

?M

ED

Hun

t Clu

b D

ay C

ours

es:

Col

lege

Cre

dit

Col

lege

Pre

para

tory

Adu

lt &

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

Voc

al io

nal/T

echn

ical

TO

TA

L H

.C. D

ay C

ours

es

Hun

t Clu

b E

veni

ng C

ours

es:

Col

lege

Cre

dit

Col

lege

Pre

para

tory

Adu

lt et

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

Voc

atio

nal/T

echn

ical

TO

TA

L H

.C. E

veni

ng C

ours

es

Hun

t Clu

b D

ay &

Eve

ning

Cou

rses

:C

olle

ge C

redi

tC

olle

ge P

repa

rato

ryA

duh&

Con

tinui

ngE

duca

tion

Voc

atio

nal/T

echn

ical

TO

TA

L A

LLH.C.

Cou

rses

Ste

1017

2. F

IE

14

Table 4

TE

M T

OT

AL

S

1987

4419

8849

1989

-90

1990

-91

1991

.92

(Thru

2104

192)

rrs

%of

%of

Fri

96 o

fX

of

FIE

15 o

f%

of

FTE

% o

t%

of

ra%

ofit

of

Tra

duce

d IN

K C

lab

All

Prod

uced

Hun

t Clu

bA

llPr

oduc

edHunt Club

All

Prod

uced

Hun

t Clu

bA

llPr

oduc

edH

unt C

lub

All

Tot

alSCC

Total

SCC

Total

SCC

Total

SCC

Total

SCC

42.6

83.

0723

%1%

61.0

922

%1%

86.6

1X

%It

85.4

828

11%

78.6

526

1it

14.55

21 8%

0%3.

811

012.

8it

0%2.

73It

0%2.93

it0%

23.42

13%

0%

68.81

25%

1%

71.37

2I1

1%

56.96

191

it

49.06

161.

It

43.72

46%

0%

25.53

9%

0t.

17.46

5%

01

14.66

5%

01

10.65

4%

Ot

2%

159.23

581

3%

178.24

55%

3%

159.83

531

3%

141.29

47%

21

66.51 0

36%

0%

1%

0%

100.17

36%

2%

130.46

401

2%

126.82

421

2%

143.99

471

2%

5.03

3%

1.73

1%

0%

5.74

21

0%

5.07

A0%

7.73

3%

Ot

27.86

15%

Ot 1%

4.16

2%0%

5.36

2%

0%

6.43

2%

Ot

4.1

it

01

99.4

54%

2%

10.83

116.19

4%

42%

0%

2%

7.05

148.61

2%

451

01 31

6

144.32

2%

471

01 2%

6.23

162.05

21

531

Ot

31

109.

193.07

19.58

51.2

8

60% 21

111

284

2% 0% 0% 11

261.

265.53

72.17

58% 2%

26%

3% 0% it

'

217.

078.54

76.73

66% 3%

23%

it 01 1%

212.

37.8

63.39

Mt

lt

214

4% 0% 1%

222.

6410

.66

53.16

73% 4t 18%

il 01 1%

1111.12

1001

3%

3636

276.12

131

11

24.51

7%

0%

20.66

71

0%

16.68

6%

eft

100

Si

126.85

1001

6%

304.15

1001

5%

303.34

1004

S%

5487

.59

5944

.81

5195

.38

5948

.658

86.0

3

Sour

ce: D

aily

FT

E's

run

Feb

ruar

y, 1

992

17ST

'"11

r A

NIA

,ilk

LE

HU

NT

CL

UB

RE

POR

TD

INO

LU

IDIT

S

7D.1

1 T

OM

S

Table 5

Hun

t Clu

b D

ay C

ours

es:

Col

lege

Cre

dit

Col

lege

Pre

para

tory

Adu

lt &

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

Voc

atio

nal/T

echn

ical

TO

TA

L H

.C. D

ay C

ours

es.

____

_

Hun

t Clu

b E

veni

ng C

ours

es:

Col

lege

Cre

dit

Col

lege

Pre

para

tory

Adu

lt &

Con

tinui

ng E

duca

tion

Voc

atio

nal/T

echn

ical

TO

TA

L H

.C. E

veni

ng C

ours

er

Hun

t Clu

b D

ay &

Eve

ning

Cou

rses

:C

olle

ge C

redi

tC

olle

ge P

repa

rato

ryA

dult

& C

ontin

uing

Edu

catio

nV

ocat

ivru

d/T

echn

ical

TO

TA

L A

LL

H.C

. Cou

rses

1937

-00

Enrollments

Amber

% of

Possible Enrolled Possible

Enrolled

1988

49

Enrollments

Number

% of

Possible Enrolled Possible

Enrolled

1919

-90

1990

-91

Enrollments

Number

% of

Enrollments

Fossiple Enrolled Possible

Possible

Enrolled '

Number

Enrolled

t of

Possible

Enrolled

1991

-92

Mtn

2/O4t92)

Enrollments

Possible

Nunber

Enrolled

a of

Possible

Enrolled

2923 24

1477

1244

5763 75 0

677

1250

2002

2998

.

124

2154

2494

7770

569

46

314

700

1329 Se

0

303

1113

1171 62

746

622

1513

2K01

19%

37%

21%

56%

28%

771 0% 45%

65%

5% 21%

371

79%

61%

368

2216 109

1592

2186

6103 95 25 54

234

1

1003

2311 13

4

2134

2517

7106

311 57 776

1356

3000 31 26 34

3

131

542

192 $3

1118

1488

3532

37%

52%

4% 621

49%

8% 3041

63%

39%

5.8% 39%

62%

521

59%

50%

2455

1157

471

2327

6542

658

71

2362

955

40%

2096

1032

1142

6%18

60.

6731

32%

4%63

54

111

9838

811

5

92es

93%

79

779

342

44%

636

450

199

441

463

1432

725

51%

1293

2566

1255

491

2442

157

128

82%

150

3161

1297

41%

2732

2282

1341

5%23

2311

6640

214%

7647

1146 41 81

487

1

2872 10

2 76 258

113

549

1248 117

1072 98

4

3421

491

sat

39%

47%

45t

891

96%

41%

24t

421

51%

781

rt.

411

45%

2695 75

1875

1378

6023 12

1

199

425

710

1455

2816 27

4

23C

0

208.

8

7470

1057 69

716

507

2429 10

4

182

172

1% 654

1161 25

1

6811

703

3483

3% 9A yrt

41%

401.

Mt

911

401

281

45% 411

921

34-1

1

381

41%

Sour

ce: D

aily

FT

E's

run

Feb

ruar

y, 1

992 BE

ST C

OO

Table 6

HUNT CLUBFTE/COST SHEET

YEAR

FTE (TOTAL)

PERSONNEL

COST ft

CURR EXP. CAPITAL TOTAL

COST FTE

81-88 183.12 229812 107985 3162 340959 1861.9

88-89 276.12 247633 139394 387027 1401.7

89-90 326.85 255174 148596 2089 405859 1241.7

90-91 304.15 235881 157060 6020 398961 1311.1

91-92 303.34 NOT YET AVAILABLE

(THRU 2-4-92)

# BASED OH REPORT YEAR TERM 3 SUMMER THRU TERM 2 WINTER

BASED OH FISCAL YEAR JULY 1- JUNE 30 AND INCLUDES ONLY THOSE COSTS FOUND IN HUNT CLUB COST CENTER

PART IIHUNT CLUB AREA DEMOGRAPHICS

tY

SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS

The following represents an analysis of the population areas inSeminole and Orange counties that surround the Hunt Club SatelliteCenter. The data are represented in census tracts(the smallestdivisions for which such information is available) cross walked tozip codes and towns. The source of the information is the MarketProfile Analysis prepared by Donnelley Marketing InformationServices in 1990 and is based on 1990 estimates as opposed toactual 1990 Census data. We estimate the error factor to be slight.

The map representation displays the census tracts surrounding HuntClub in the form of a rectangle enclosing parts of Seminole andOrange. Chart 1 contains the data for the Seminole target tractsand is followed by Chart 2 s-hich describes the characteristics ofall of the 45 Seminole County Tracts. In the same way, Chart 3lists the Orange County Tracts in question and is followed by Chart4 containing all of the Orange County tracts. The following pointscan be made relative to the data:

Relative to Seminole and Orange

(1) While both the surrounding Orange and Seminole countypopulations share the same age range ( median age of approximately30 1980) the median household income of the Seminole tracts in 1990was higher than the Orange county ones. In addition, while thetarget tracts in both counties had high growth rates between 1980and 90, the high growth tracts in Seminole had substantially largerpopulations than the high growth ones in Orange(see Charts 1 and3).

Seminole County Specifically

(2) 3 of the 4 Seminole county census tracts surrounding Hunt Clubwere in the top 20% of all Seminole census tracts showing growthbetween 1980 and 1990(see Chart 1 and Chart 2).

(3) 2 of the 4 target tracts were within the top 10% of medianhousehold income for all Seminole tracts in 1990(see Chart 1 andChart 2).

(4) 3 of the 4 surrounding tracts were within the top 20% of 1980median age for all Seminole tracts(see Chart 1 and Chart 2).

Orange County Specifically

(5) 6 of the 10 Orange county census tracts surroundi g Hunt Clubwere in the top 20% of all Orange census tracts s7 ing growthbetween 1980 and 1990(see Chart 3 and Chart 4).

(6) The 6 high growth census tracts were in the top 40% of median

household income for all Orange tracts in 1990(see Chart 3 andChart 4).

(7) The 6 high growth census tracts were within the top 20% of 1980median age for all Orange tracts)see chart 3 and Chart 4).

Observations

The Hunt Club Satellite Center is positioned close to the highestgrowth areas in Orange and Seminole counties (1980-90). From acommunity college marketing standpoint, the lower income, Orangecounty areas adjoining Hunt Club may resemble the more traditionalsource of community college students. However these tracts have amuch smaller population than their Seminole county equivalents andmay therefore limit growth potential.

09 .4v1

.

Cen

sus

trac

ts s

urro

undi

ng th

e H

unt

Clu

b sa

telli

te c

ente

r

Sanf

ord

Lak

e M

178.

216.

021

r-S

emin

ole

Cun

ty17

717

8.03

176 17

5.02

217.

01H

unt C

lub

217.

0217

5.01

151.

02 1

51.0

1 15

2.01

155.

01

ran

eou

n

BE

ST C

OPY

AV

AIL

AB

I r

(1. r C

.)

SEMINOLE COUNTY CENSUS TRACTS SURROUNDING HUNT CLUB

%

TRACT TOO ZIP POPULATION

INCREASE

80-90

CHART 1

RANK OF

INC REL

TO OTHER 1990

TRACKS(45) POPULATION

MEDIAN HOUSE-

HOLD INCOME

1990

MEDIAN

MEDIAN

RANK

AGE

1980

MEDIAN RANK

(216.07)

(216.08)

216.03 ALTAMONTE SPG 32701 129% 5 19578 46031 6 31 9

ALTAMONTE SPG 32714

APOPKA 32703

LONGROOD 32750

LONGWOOD 32779

(216.04)

(216.05)

(216.06)

216.02 ALTAMONTE SPG 32701 95% 10 23818 60169 4 31 9

ALTAMONTE SPG 3714

APOPKA 32703

APOPKA 32712

CASSELBERRY 32708

LONGPOOD 32750

LONR403D 32779

(217.04)

(217.03)

217.01 ALTAMONTE SPG 32701 127% 6 11772 38760 15 32 8

ALTAMONTE SPG 32714

APOPKA 32703

APOPKA 32712

217.02 ALTAMONTE SPG 32701 15% 30 9586 37362 16 27 13

ALTAMONTE SPG 32714

MAITLAND 32751

ORLANDO 32809.

ORLANDO 32810

ORLANDO 32824

',Reflects Seminole County resider_es with Orange County Zip Codes

BEST COPY Atu../:7 E

CHART 2

SEMINOLE

CENSUS PERCENT

TRACK INCREASE RANK

MEDIAN

HCUSE

INCCIIE Rank

MEDIAN

1980

AGE RANK

213.01 192% 1 61761 2 33 7

208.01 182% 2 36173 17 35 5

208.02 138% 3 40155 11 30 10

216.01 136% 4 74623 1 32 8

216.03 129% 5 46031 6 31 9

217.01 127% 6 38760 15 32 8

214.02 111% 7 40348 10 30 10

214.01 110% 8 38985 14 30 10

201.01 109% 9 12830 43 42 3

216.02 95% 10 60169 4 31 9

212.01 91% 11 32080 23 35 5

222.02 84% 12 43665 8 33 7

212.02 80% 13 31190 25 33 7

205 75% 14 12353 44 23 14

221.02 73% 15 41240 9 30 10

209.03 67% 16 29790 27 29 11

215.03 59% 17 32686 22 35 5

219.01 58% 18 39087 13 34 6

210 49% 19 27830 31 33 7

218.01 48% 20 44905 7 34 6

206 46% 21 28520 29 36 4

207 44% 22 35121 19 33 7

213.03 44% 23 33160 21 34 6

211 43% 24 13200 42 27 13

209.02 36% 25 25000 33 31 9

215.04 27% 26 61403 3 34 6

215.02 27% 27 33202 20 27 13

215.01 25% 28 49058 5 31 9

220.01 24% 29 18826 38 28 12

217.02 15% 30 37362 16 27 13

209.01 12% 31 24798 35 28 12

202.02 11% 32 24959 34 29 11

221.01 9% 33 24762 36 35 5

203.02 9% 34 25275 32 31 9

213.02 9% 35 25275 32 32 8

218.02 5% 36 29241 28 32 8

219.02 5% 37 15966 41 32 8

203.01 3% 38 28057 30 43 2

220.02 3% 39 35553 18 35 5

202.01 1% 40 21744 37 47 1

204.01 0% 41 17374 40 29 11

201.02 -10% 42 18550 39 33 7

204.02 -14% 43 31666 24 28 12

220.03 -17% 44 39483 12 34 6

222.01 -18% 45 30839 26 35 5

33623.44 32.35555

CHART 3

ORANGE COUNTY CERSUS TRACTS SURROUNDING HUNT CLUB

TRACT TOWN

%

ZIP POPULATION

INCREASE

80-90

RANK OF

INC REL

TO OTHER 1990

TRACKS( 117) POPULATION

MEDIAN HOUSE

HOLD INCOME

1990

MEDIAN

MEDIAN

RANK

AGE

1980

MEDIAN RANK

177 APOPKA 32703 92 18 6996 32065 49 32 20

32712

178.03 APOPKA 32703 127% 9 8958 31494 52 27 25

32712

176 APOPKA 32703 34% 38 7101 18339 107 24 28

32712

175.02 APOPKA 32703 108% 14 8120 28849 64 29 23

32712

175.01 APOPKA 32703 36% 37 4521 21557 95 25 27

ORLANDO 32818

178.02 APOPKA 32703 100% 15 3632 35128 36 35 17

32712

PLYMOUYH 32768

151.01 ORLANDO 32808 66% 24 9748 32178 47 30 22

32810

32919

151.02 ORLANDO 32809 85% 19 4770 27527 71 30 22

32818

32808

32810

APOPKA 32703

152.01 ORLANDO 32810 37% 36 2883 29482 60 30 22

ALTAMONTE SPRINGS 32714*

ORLANDO 32805

MAITLAND 32751

155.01 MAITLAND 32751 -2% 60 4001 44614 12 34 18

*Reflects Orange County residences with Altamonte Springs Zip Code

6

CHART 4

ORANGE

CENSUS PERCENT

TRACK INCREASE RANK

MEDIAN

HOUSE

INCOME RANK

MEDIAN

1980

AGE RANK

148.03 253% 1 51116 7 31 21

170 252% 2 37236 28 28 24

146.03 236% 3 30632 56 26 26

171.02 234% 4 40784 18 34 18

164.01 208% 5 32119 48 26 26

124 170% 6 39050 23 30 22

167.01 162% 7 38185 25 29 23

148.01 147% 8 18679 106 32 20

178.03 127% 9 31494 52 27 25

135.01 124% 10 27768 67 28 24

136.01 123% 11 36623 30 29 23

167.02 118% 12 32974 42 26 26

164.03 116% 13 36299 32 28 24

175.02 108% 14 28849 64 29 23

178.02 100% 15 35128 36 35 17

148.02 99% 16 43375 13 33 19

135.02 99% 16 26156 74 36 16

167.04 97% 17 38682 24 31 21

177 92% 18 32065 49 32 20

151.02 85% 19 27527 71 30 22

165.02 85% 19 24860 80 24 28

165.01 75% 20 21666 94 24 28

150 73% 21 25143 79 26 26

167.03 71% 22 34312 38 30 22

173 67% 23 21849 93 30 22

151.01 66% 24 32178 47 30 22

149.02 66% 24 27941 66 33 19

104 59% 25 10663 115 26 26

134.01 55% 26 30748 54 27 25

106 54% 27 13017 113 28 24

155.02 46% 28 21959 91 23 29

133 45% 29 34933 37 31 21

123 44% 30 37773 27 28 24

132 43% 31 29413 61 33 19

147 42% 32 22278 89 27 25

146.01 41% 33 23791 84 21 30

149.01 41% 33 33592 40 31 21

156.01 39% 34 64082 3 40 12

157.02 38% 35 48113 9 37 15

152.01 37% 36 29482 60 30 22

171.01 36% 37 32740 44 29 23

168.01 36% 37 19541 100 26 26

178.01 36% 37 22862 88 28 24

179 36% 37 22109 90 34 18

136.02 36% 37 33355 41 29 23

175.01 36% 37 21557 95 25 27

166 36% 37 23605 85 31 21

139 30% 38 35766 33 36 16

176 34% 38 18339 107 24 28

2:1

CHART 4

ORANGE

CENSUS PERCENT

TRACK INCREASE RANK

MEDIAN

HOUSE

INCOME RANK

MEDIAN

1980

AGE RANK

141 28% 39 40466 19 35 17

169.01 31% 39 28995 63 26 26

171.03 31% 39 42500 14 33 19

162 23% 40 52728 5 36 16

172 21% 41 20172 97 33 19

117.01 21% 41 18852 103 25 27

103 20% 42 18795 104 48 4

146.02 17% 43 29916 58 21 30

107.01 14% 44 70224 1 49 3

125 12% 45 30812 53 48 4

174 12% 45 21354 96 31 21

113 11% 46 27414 72 36 16

102 11% 46 19182 101 35 17

108.02 10% 47 23097 87 41 11

138 9% 48 41302 17 33 19

119.01 9% 48 18707 105 23 29

137 8% 49 25749 77 29 23

107.02 8% 49 31703 51 43 9

118 7% 50 24559 81 32 20

129 7% 50 36592 31 48 4

130.02 7% 50 27646 69 27 25

158.02 7% 50 45995 11 41 11

112 6% 51 37842 26 40 12

161 6% 51 42012 16 49 3

127.01 5% 52 30076 57 40 12

164.02 4% 53 28684 65 31 21

126 3% 54 31877 50 47 5

159.01 3% 54 14080 112 30 22

158.01 3% 54 55163 4 46 6

111 2% 55 40050 20 42 10

128 2% 55 49427 8 45 7

144 2% 55 4000) 21 44 8

140 2% 55 52468 6 35 17

160.02 1% 56 46250 10 47 5

130.01 0% 57 N/A 117 20 31

117.02 0% 57 19898 99 25 27

121 -1% 58 26083 75 35 17

109 -2% 59 17611 109 53 2

156.02 -2% 59 68468 2 37 15

155.01 -2% 59 44614 12 34 18

131 -3% 60 36973 29 34 18

108.01 -3% 60 26437 73 34 18

116 -6% 61 24245 82 28 24

101 -7% 62 9653 116 45 7

152.02 -8% 63 32707 45 29 23

127.02 -8% 63 19955 98 35 17

145 -8% 63 27597 70 29 23

134.02 -8% 63 35323 35 28 24

153 -9% 64 27755 68 38 14

o0

CHART 4

ORANGE

MEDIAN MEDIAN

CENSUS PERCENT HOUSE 1980

TRACK INCREASE RANK 1NCO1E RANK AGE RANK

115 -9% 64 15822 111 29 23

122 -9% 64 42105 15 30 22

160.01 -10% 65 29090 62 28 24

114 -11% 66 17021 110 37 15

143.01 -12% 67 32844 43 30 22

105 -12% 67 12006 114 32 20

157.01 -12% 67 39417 22 45 7

142 -12% 67 35413 34 27 25

154.02 -13% 68 23587 86 37 15

120 -13% 68 34056 39 27 25

143.02 -13% 68 25235 78 28 24

163.02 -14% 69 29627 59 27 25

168.02 -15% 70 26081 76 23 29

159.02 -18% 71 18892 102 56 1

169.02 -19% 72 32644 46 28 24

154.01 -19% 72 23858 83 26 26

110 -23% 73 17931 108 33 19

163.01 -24% 74 30727 55 39 13

119.02 -25% 75 21923 92 31 21

117 30715.34 32.70940

PART IIISTUDENT PROFILE

Part I and II of the Hunt Club study dealt with course offeringsand FTE production, and Hunt Club area demographics, respectively.Part III develops the Hunt Club student profile.

For Part III, IAR Office looked at two representative terms, FallTerm of 1990-1991 and 1991-92.

- Generally, the changes in racial/ethnic mix at Hunt Club (HC) inthe two terms were minor. HC's racial/ethnic mix does notreflect the same pattern as Seminole Community College as awhole. See Tables 1 and 2.

Within course type, vocational/technical had a higher percentageof females.

Females account for 69% of the total HC enrollment, compared to54% for the entire college in Term 911 and 52% in Term 901.

Hunt Club has had a higher percentage of white enrollment(86% at HC in Term 911 and 87% in Term 901 compared to 80% forall of SCC.) Fewer blacks are represented with 3% at HC in bothterms compared to 7% total SCC.

- Though percentages changed between the two terms, consistently alarger percentage of HC college credit students enrolled in HCeveni ;g classes while HC day classes attracted the higherpercentages of HC adult/continuing ed and vocational technicalstudents. (See Table 3.)

The percentages of all HC students enrolled in both HC day andevening classes remained about the same, with more than a fourthof the HC college credit students enrolled in both HC's day andevening classes.

Around 50% of HC college credit students attended both maincampus and HC, whereas the majority of HC adult/continuing ed andvocational/technical students attended Hunt Club exclusively.

- Hunt Club students generated more FTE in both terms at the HuntClub than at the main campus in all course types. See Table 4.

In both terms studied, at least 28% of the HC college creditstudents were full-time SCC students, and the majority were inthe "traditional" college age bracket of under 25.

- Adult & continuing education and vocational/technical courseswere taken primarily by students 40 and over. Tables 5 and 6show the nercentage distribution of HC students relative totheir total SCC enrollment and portion of HC FTE earned.

Two full years, 1989-90 and 1990-91, were studied for HC students'residence by zip code. However, because of city/countyoverlap of some zip codes, 22% of the HC students'city/county of residence could not be determined in both years.Consequently these students are presented as a separate category.A Central Florida Zip Codes map from the Central Florida PhoneBook, 1992, is provided for reference.

- The largest groups of HC students in all course types came fromSeminole County. See Table 7 and 8.

- In both years, in the college credit and college preparatorycourses (type 1), most students positively identified fromSeminole County were under age 25. From Orange and Lakecounties most HC college credit students were 25 or older.

- Over 50% of the HC student population from both Orange andSeminole counties in both terms were enrolled in college creditand college preparatory courses.

- Numbers of both HC adult & continuing education (type 3) andvocational/technical (type 4) students were overwhelmingly overage 25 from the major represented geographical areas.

- In the case of both Orange and Seminole counties the majority ofHC students came from the targeted 1..:.gh growth zip codessurrounding Hunt Club. See Tables 9 and 10.

SCC HUNT CLUB UNDUPLICATED ENROLLMENT BY RACE and SEX

fall Term, 1990 -91

(Ter 901)

Talple 1

NUMBERS

WITHIN COURSE TYPE'

College Credit and

Mon-Resident Alien

Asian-Pacific Islander

American Indian

Slack (Non-Hispanic)

Spanish

White (Mon - Hispanic)

Total Students

Male

female

Total

Mole

female

Total

Male

Female

Total

Male

female

Total

Male

female

Total

Mole

female

Total

Male

female

Total

College Prep

11

27

916

33

65

14

19

18

25

43

236

472

708

270

524

194

Adult/Continuing Ed

423

29

44

80

I1

18

f14

17

31

60

164

224

85

217

302

Vocational/Technical

01

10

44

00

01

56

1I

247

143

210

49

114

22)

UNDUPLICATED TOTAL

725

32

11

14

27

34

71

21

34

33

43

74

343

784

1129

404

901

1305

PERCENTAGES

WHIN COURSE TYPE:

College Credit and

College Prep

002

02

12

11

22

02

02

12

It

22

22

031

51

30%

598

892

342

662

1002

Adult/Continuing Ed

22

82

102

It

12

32

002

01

02

32

32

58

62

102

201

548

741

282

128

1002


02

00%

02

021

02

002

01

22

32

02

0It

211

70

948

222

7112

1002

UNDUPLICATED TOTAL

It

21

21

12

I2

21

01

Ot

It

12

22

32

32

32

42

242

402

872

312

491

1001

UNDUPLICATED SCC

(EXCLUDING ANS)

21

It

011

It

22

08

01

01

32

52

71

32

42

72

382

422

001

481

522

1002

Source'

STD/NC/COUNT

Report Q, STO/COUNT Report

2.

Percentage totals may not agree due to rounding

ONOUPLICATED TOTAL counts a student only once even though s/he

may be in more than one course type

BE

ST

CO

PY

E71

1/12

111

I I

SCC AUNT CLUB UNDUPLICATED ENROLLMENT BY RACE and SEX

Fall Term, 119142

(Term 911)

Tab

le2

NUMBERS

VITNIN COURSE TYPE'

College Credit and

Non-Resident Alien

Asian - Pacific !slender

American Indian

Black (Non-Hispanic)

Spanish

Uhlte (Non-Hispanic)

Total St:dents

Male

Female

Total

Kole

Female

Total

Kale

female .

Total

hale

Female

Total

Male

Female

Total

Male

Female

Total

Kale

Female

Total

College Prep

00

05

38

66

12

10

12

22

17

34

51

222

503

725

260

558

818

Adult/Continuing Ed

421

25

23

51

01

53

812

20

32

56

119

175

80

166

246


0I

I0

33

00

00

44

29

11

66

190

256

41

207

215

UNDUPLICATED TOTAL

422

26

79

16

76

13

15

19

)4

31

6)

04

342

801

1143

406

920

1326

PERCENTAGES

WITHIN COURSE TYPE'

College Credit and

College Prep

00

02

02

12

02

It

12

12

It

It

II

32

22

42

62

272

612

892

322

682

1002

Adult/Continuing Ed

22

92

101

12

it

22

02

02

0%

22

It

32

52

82

132

232

482

712

3)0

671

1001

Vocotimil/lechnical

02

01

02

02

II

11

02

02

02

02

It

12

12

32

42

242

611

932

252

752

1001

UNDUPLICATED TOTAL

02

22

72

12

It

It

12

02

It

12

12

32

22

50

71

261

602

la

312

692

1002

UNOUPLICAIEO SCC

(EXCLUDING ANS)

It

II

22

12

II

22

01

01

02

31

42

72

31

42

7I

372

432

801

462

542

1002

Source'

STD/MC/COUNT

Report 2, STD/COUNT Report 2


UNDUPLICATE0 TOTAL

coun

ta student only once even though s/he may be In more than one course type

BE

ST C

OPY

Er:

3

COURSE TYPE

Table 3

5CC HUNT CLUB DAY /EVENING ENROLLMENT

UNDUPLICATED STUDENTS WHIN COURSE TYPE

FALL TERMS 1990-11 (901) and 1991-92

Percentage

Percentage

Percentage

Total

Enrolled

Enrolled

Enrolled

Number

In Day

In Evening

in Both

Classes

Classes

Day/Evening

Term

Term

Term

Term

Term

Term

Term

Term

901

911

901

911

901

'II

901

911

College Credit and

College Prep

302

242

442

492

262

272

194

818

Adult/Continuing Ed

592

682

412

302

12

22

302

146


782

732

142

202

92

72

223

275

ALL COURSES

442

422

382

12

172

182

1319

1339

Totals say not agree due to rounding.

Source,

STO/HC/DAYEVE Reports

BE

ST

CO

PY

r"..

Course Type

(Teri 901)

SCC HUNT CLUB STUDENTS' COURSE LOAD

Fall Term, 1510-1,11 and 1991-1992

!Nisbet of HC Students

FTC Generated by

Percentage of Total

HUMBER

Hunt Club Students

SCC Students Attending Hunt Club

Table 4

Humber

Humber

Total

Part-Time FullTime

Attending

Attending

At

At

Part-Time

Full-Time

Total

P-T

F-T

Number

(All SCC)

(All SCC)

Hunt Club

Runt Club G

Hunt Club

Slain Carpus

(All 5CC)

(All SCC)

(All SCC)

all SCC

all SCC all SCC

Eleinninely

Main COOVUS

College Credit and

College Fr-:

566

228

382

412

82.84

63.89

130

91

118

4485

2469

6954

Adult/Contir

295

7276

26

27.87

2.83

80

42

80

3808

174

3982

Yocatiof:1/

223

0194

29

5.96

0.51

50

01

48

4484

559

5043

TOTAL

1084

235

852

467

116.67

67.23

88

78

88

12777

3202

15919

,111

College Credit and

College Prep

589

229

414

404

84.75

62.80

129

91

119

5051

2636

1681

Adult/Continuing Ed

244

2278

18

25.43

15.45

6%

IX

68

3881

180

4061

Vocational /Technical

215

0204

66

6.16

1.39

11

08

dt

4174

521

4497

TOTAL

1108

231

851

488

116.34

71.64

110

78

HZ

13108

3337

16445

Sources STD/NC/SCHEDULES, STUNC/SSHCAIMT

Totals say not agree due to rounding

Ftr,

;::r:

4FJ

41

SCE NUM CCU ACE OROUP/FTE OiSTRIBUTION BY COURSE TYPE

Fall Ter., 1990-1991

Tem 901

Course Type/Age Range

Part-Time Enrollees at 5CC

Full -Tine Enrollees at SCC

HC FTC

Feoale

22

Male

MC FIE

Emile

MC FTC

PIT

PIT

Male

21

11

Students

HC FTE

I

i Total

I Total

College Cr.

iii College Prep

To-24

91

91

131

132

222

222

132

25-39

102

82

231

192

332

272

li

40 and Over

12

12

162

121

172

131

01

Total

202

172

512

451

712

632

141

Adult & Continuing Education

To-24

101

192

92

122

192

312

12

25-39

62

52

231

262

281

312

01

40 and Over

172

72

382

241

502

312

02

Total

272

312

702

622

972

932

12


To-24

02

02

22

II

22

11

02

25-39

102

102

302

312

402

472

08

40 and Over

121

92

462

482

582

572

02

Total

222

192

782

811

1001

1001

02

Source'

STD/NC/SWOON% STO/DA1LYFTE


BE

ST C

OPY

Et,7

ZS:

T.E

Table 5

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

NUMBER

HC

HC FTC

HC FTC

F/T

f/T

STUDENTS

FTC I

NUMER

2 Students

HC FTC

%Total

%Total

162

122

172

252

3)2

373

22

22

22

31

42

281

02

12

I%

12

12

140

182

152

192

791

372

794

12

02

II

12

21

59

Ot

12

32

I%

32

89

It

02

11

12

22

154

22

21

52

32

72

302

02

02

02

02

02

4

02

02

01

02

02

89

02

01

01

02

02

130

02

at

ot

ot

ot

223

551

311

142

1002

87.84

332

341

332

1001

27.87

II

422

572

1001

5.96

SCC HUNT CLUS AGE GROUP/FTE TAKEN DISTRIBUTION BY COURSE TYPE

Fall Term, 1991-1992

Term 911

Table 4

Course Type/Age Range

Part-Time Enrollees at SCC

Full-Time Enrollees at SCE

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

NUMBER

HC

HC FTC

Male

HC FTE

Female

NC FTE

P/T

PIT

Male

11C FTC

resale

HC FTC

FIT

F/1

STUDENTS

FTE %

NUMBER

22

I2

Students

NC FTC

22

22 Students

HC FTC

2 Total

2 Total

I Total

2 Total

College Cr.

1, College Prep

To-24

102

92

161

162

262

252

101

132

142

182

242

312

404

562

25-39

82

72

222

192

291

262

22

22

22

22

32

31

261

291

40 and Over

32

22

142

122

172

142

02

02

11

12

12

11

141

152

Total

202

III

52Z

472

722

042

122

142

162

212

282

362

818

1001

84.75

Adult T. Continuing Education

To -24

112

152

Iii

III

222

261

02

02

01

01

02

01

53

262

25-39

112

142

212

222

332

362

02

01

OX

01

01

01

80

362

40 and Ouer

91

101

352

251

452

552

12

22

02

12

11

31

113

382

Total

121

192

672

502

992

972

It

22

Ot

12

12

32

246

1002

25.43


Im.24

OR

2%

42

41

42

51

Ot

Ot

OR

Ot

Ot

02

12

52

25.39

101

92

292

291

401

381

01

02

01

01

Ot

02

109

381

40 and Over

142

112

422

462

562

562

01

02

00

02

02

02

154

561

Total

251

211

752

792

1002

1000

02

02

02

02

02

02

275

1002

4.16

Source,

STO/HC/SSHCOUNT, STO/DAILYFTE


BE

ST 1

:011

'Y

CENTRAL FLORIDA ZIP CODES

t""'RES CV

SUMMARY BY YEAR OF HC STUDENTS' RESIDENCE BY ZIP CODE

YEAR 1989-90 (893,894,901,9(2)

COUNTY

LAKE COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

OSCEOLA COUNTY

SEMINOLE COUNTY

VOLUSIA COUNTY

UNIDENT1FED COUNTY(NOT CLEARLY DEFINED)

GRAND TOTAL BYCOURSE TYPE:

COURSE TYPE

TOTAL LAKE COUNTY

TOTAL ORANGE COUNTY

TOTAL OSCEOLA COUNTY

TOTAL SEMINOLE COUNTY.

TOTAL VOLUSIA COUNTY

TOTAL ONIDENTIFP.

GRAND TOTAL FOR 1989-90

Course Type:1= Coil QeCrecitaidCoiIe9e Prep3= M itonflnung Eduattion4= Vocationalifechrical

Source: STD)NC/COUNT Report 4

1

34

1

34

1

34

1

34

1

34

1

34

TABLE 7

AGE 15- 24M F TOTAL

ACE 25- 39M F TOTAL

AGE 40 &OVEFIM F TOTAL

GRANDTOTAL!

2 1 3 3 7 10 2 5 7 200 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 20 1 1 1 3 4 3 2 5 10

2 2 4412 16 5 7 12 32

40 61 101 37 81 118 6 37 43 2628 13 21 7 26 33 11 23 34 883 6 9 19 47 66 19 55 74 149

51 80 131 63 154 217 36 115 151 499

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1

0.0 0.0 0 0 0 3 3 3

270 314 584 91 214 305 22 159 181 107035 41 76 27 80 107 47 139 186 3694 13 17 47 112 159 66 199 265 441

: 309 368 ... _677 165 406 571 135 497 632 1880

0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1

0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1

.0 1 13 1 I 1 2 0 . 1 t 4

64 99 163 62 93 155 12 48 60 37829 16 45 13 37 50 20 50 70 1652 6 8 17 53 70 24 60 84 162

96 1 ... 2i6:i.::27S6i58. 214: 705

376 476 852 193 396 589 42 249 291 173272 70 142 47 145 192 78 215 293 6279 26 35 85 215 300 112 317 429 764

457 572 1029 325 756 1081 232 781 1013 3123

4 6

SUMMARY BY YEAR OF HC STUDENTS' RESIDENCE BY ZIP CODE

YEAR 1990-1991 (903,944,911,912)

COUNTY

LAKE COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

OSCEOLA COUNTY

SEMINOLE COUNTY

VOLUSIA COUNTY

UNIDENT1FED COUNTY(NOT CLEARLY DEFINED)

GRAND TOTAL BYCOURSE TYPE:

COURSE TYPE

34

TOTAL LAKE COUNTY

TOTAL ORANGE COUNTY

TOTAL OSCEOLA COUNTY

TOTAL SEMINOLE. COUNTY: Bill....

poTALvowsLoNcpulfiy.:-

34

1

34

1

34

1

1

3

TABLE 8

AGE 15- 24M F TOTAL

AGE 25- 39M F TOTAL

AGE 40 &OVERGIVNITM F TOTAL TOTAL

1 5 6 3 7 10 0 3 3 191 1 2 0 3 3 1 1 2 70 0 0 0 5 5 0 4 4 9

2 6 8 3 15 18 1 8 9 35

35 51 86 35 77 112 8 28 36 23414 10 24 11 18 29 10 27 37 89

1 9 10 13 50 63 9 32 41 114

50 70 120 59 145 204 27 87 114 437

1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1:: 0 1; 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

271 352 623 105 207 312 38 163 201 113656 67 123 69 85 154 57 139 196 473

5 15 20 33 105 138 69 202 271 429

332', 4,14 ;.::: 7es: 207 397 604 164.504 668 2038

0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1

0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 >':3 8; : I 0 1 0 0 0 4

84 121 205 44 105 149 10 38 46 4001 16 27 43 28 30 58 22 37 59 160

1 10 11 11 30 41 30 60 90 142

101::1 ':::: 259; 83 :158.Ii::::::::: 248 62 133 :.: 195! 702:

392 529 921 1: 396 584 56 230 286 1791I 87 107 194 108 136 244 90 204 294 731t 7 35 42 57 190 247 108 298 406 e95

486 671 1157 353 722 1075 254 732 986 3217

TOTALINDENTIFEDCOUNIT

GRAND TOTAL FOR 1990-91

Course Type:1= Ca Credtand Wive Prep3= 'ruing Eciucabon4= Vocational/Tectrical

Source: STD/HC/COUNT Report 4

4 't

00

111111111111111 11111111111111111151 ' 11

111111111111111 11111111111111111111

111 .111

1 III

111111iiiM §

Ill

IIII,111111 1

J. J. J. J. J.

111111111111111 m1111111111111111111 1 1

46 (0 -A 46 Ca -A A (0 -6 44 (4 4 44 4 44 4. 4. (4 -6 4. W- 44 (4 -A 44 (0 44 C4 A .44 0

W

§

008h)080b1808088

... _, ., 0 co ti

CA 8 i h) h) 8 ft, 8 ER

_.

.. -. 1

n) CA t CA 8

i

N) CA t h) 8 8

E..

8

-. ii

8

8

R

000

000

o c) o c>

c) -. _. 0 -. CA CD CD C) 4 ..4 ..4 ...4 44 8

000c).-000.-.0o).N8

o -. -. 0 ro =2

o c> -. o) -. CO N) : 8

A

mg g

11

I

A Cl 4'

P

g6)

g Q)

9 g

CD CA 44 -4 *4 CA A. 0; 8 A

:: 8 co t3

CAN CA CA CA 8 8 8 SR 8 zt ;i: t3 iJ

g CON:1-NI*48521PI88Mg

SR

52

N)

4A4

t

8

A -74

000

- ON

"ONO

-. 0 4 A A CO - C) h) -4 C) -A CO CO 8

...4 -4 ......... .4 co 4 4 -4 0 0 6 40 4) CA h) N) C) 44 -4

-4-41.080

);

3:

2

tg

11

8 8

.3,2

F

iiii

g

g g

A CO -. ix A h) co co CA *4 44 (0 SI

CA

i CO a ) 8 C A D 8 S3 2 : SR Al 888 t 8

g CA *4 P3 8 8 SS V (1 .71 ;8 8 SS 8

8

(2i

8

il

o -. C)

CD C D -A

0 -. -. 0

0000-AN000040000W

........m 0 A 0 0 3 - a -A

co . . ,4 4 Cl) A CD N) 8 co K) 8 8 .I?

PI

X 719:'8

2

14

ti 4

* ? T 8 8 § .93 ii

-. -- co co -. co 4. ;8 61 !!

co I.) co 8 co co it t

1 ::

NU

MB

ER

OF

SR

/DE

NT

S IN

TA

RG

ET

CE

NS

US

TR

AC

KY

EA

R 1

90S

-90

ones

cacn

,ac

ZIP

AR

EA

CO

UN

TY

TY

PE

3275

1E

AS

TO

N/1

.LE

& M

AIT

LAN

D"

OR

AN

GE

/SE

MIN

OLE

1

3275

1E

AS

TO

NV

ILLE

& M

AIT

LAN

D*

OR

AN

GE

/SF

_MIN

OLE

332

751

EA

ST

ON

VLL

E &

MA

ITLA

ND

*OR

AN

GE

/SE

MIN

OLE

432

703

AP

OP

KA

OR

AN

GE

/SE

MIN

OLE

1

3270

3A

PO

PK

A*

OR

AN

GE

/SE

MIN

OLE

332

703

AP

OP

KA

OR

AN

GE

/SE

MIN

OLE

4

TA

RG

Eitt

fiSE

MilL

iOLE

CO

UM

VIW

OR

AN

GO

OO

NT

V/P

.CO

DE

S

TO

TA

L S

EM

INO

LE C

OU

NIY

1M71

-1 O

RA

NG

E C

OU

NT

Y Z

IP C

OD

ES

Cou

rse

Typ

e:1

Col

lege

Cre

dit a

nd C

olle

ge P

rep

3 A

dult/

Con

tinui

ng E

duos

tion

Voo

dion

elfr

edvd

cal

Sou

roe:

ST

D/H

C/C

OU

NT

Rep

ort 4

5 i)

AG

E 1

515

MF

24

TO

TA

L

AG

EM

25F

39

TO

TA

L

AG

E40

& O

VE

RM

F

TO

TA

LOT

AL

3RA

ND

77

142

13

02

219

10

13

25

310

1319

00

02

13

08

811

3961

100

3970

109

933

4225

123

1235

724

3111

2839

105

o6

67

2431

1537

5289

70-

8615

660

122

182

3811

815

649

4

360

448

808

228

560

788

171

612

783

2379

BE

ST C

O A

UE

ZIE

TA

BLE

9P

epe

2

0

1--

0

8qu7°--- ,t:-..,

,72.22§4q4488ARM2,

1.....

Q

W0<

1-O1

0 N N0(001-100,000.-N0.D0J00.4-(00c0,1-4-N 00,

Or0,--NOr-ONMOON- 000

8

8

0

,o.

CO

031,-)28,78f-.140,00

in428,0.imu,CIOVOMFic77WNNO't0

Wg3

LkNMW0<

I-0/-

.-o-NNN()WWNg3 8 0-0

rONW.--Nv-MOVDWr .-...--0

0.--0,-,ONW.:1-0 000

S

4

zigp-c:),38mq r..-01.00.t(0.-- ,--

W 8Wctp8RONcicomcf-N000(000.4.

U .

v-NWMw

4F'-

F-

.4,0,0-01.00sm,IN0000

cv.--0(.1000-0 wtm, 000

N000.,--0,-NOW0T-r- 000

%

4

2

8 wovoir14(08,0-07,..,

0 8(0-08,0,-."

8 (000,2FiNg3004000

CQ

4

NU

MB

ER

OF

ST

UD

EN

TS

IN T

AR

GE

T C

EN

SU

S T

RA

CK

YE

AR

199

0-19

91 (

903,

904,

911,

912)

ZIP

AR

EA

CO

UN

TY

TY

PE

3275

1E

AST

OW

IUE

& W

itTL

AN

D*

OR

AN

GE

/SE

MIN

OLE

1

3275

1E

AS

TO

NV

LLE

& M

AM

AN

D*

OR

AN

GE

/SE

MIN

OLE

332

751

EA

ST

ON

ILLE

& M

AM

AN

D*

OR

AN

GE

/SE

MIN

OLE

432

703

AP

OP

KA

* O

RA

NG

E/S

EM

INO

LE1

3270

3A

PO

PK

A*

OR

AN

GE

/SE

MIN

OLE

332

703

AP

OP

KA

* O

RA

NG

E/S

EM

INO

LE4

AG

E 1

5-24

MF

TO

TA

L

AG

E 2

5- 3

9M

FT

OT

AL

-ME

W)

&

OV

EFF

-j-G

AA

N61

MF

TO

TT

OT

AL

38

115

510

10

122

11

21

23

25

712

01

10

00

57

1213

5583

138

2073

934

2529

260

1019

2915

2540

1324

3710

61

56

316

199

1827

52

TA

BL

E 1

0Pa

ge 2

TA

RG

ET

ED

SE

MIN

OLE

CO

UN

TY

WIT

H O

RA

NG

E C

OU

NT

Y Z

IP C

OD

ES

TO

TA

L70

117

187

4412

116

534

7911

346

51

TO

TA

L S

EM

INO

LE C

OU

NT

Y W

ITH

OR

AN

GE

CO

UN

TY

ZIP

CO

DE

S38

250

488

626

654

280

819

159

178

224

75

Cou

rse

Typ

e:1=

Col

lege

Cre

dt a

nd C

olle

ge P

rep

3= A

dult

atra

ing

Edu

catio

n4=

Voc

atio

neirf

ectn

ical

Sou

rce:

SM

/HC

/CO

UN

T R

epor

t4

ed 353 032 jc 930 067 title institution pub … · 40z fte generated 83.72 159.23 178.24 159.83...

Documents